RELATED:
Henry Kissinger, War Criminal Extraordinaire: What You Need To Know About His Real History – And Why (Wake Up Kiwi)
Category Archives: News
FEMA’s Camps & large scale ‘readiness’ drills carried out since the ’80s
From Agent131711 @ substack
An update 6/12/23: links to the truthwatch site are not working … I am told there has been an attack on the Website server, (possibly the current goings on with NZ whistleblower revealing lies). My own access was cut right when editing those links….
as @ late 6 Dec the truthwatch site is back up now.
EWNZ Comment: I recall folk reporting on these scenarios well over a decade back when the internet was new, the camps appearing in disguise often.
Polite appeals to those in charge who are denying all evidence exposing the jab are of course not cutting it. These folk fail to take into account the sheer evil of the persons driving the genocide... which is what it clearly is. Here is how they deal with those who know too much and who expose their cover ups...
Be sure you know the escape routes from your area and be wary of official advice. For now they are stamping out ‘brush fires’ with censorship, knowing they are well on target and that soon there will be too few people left to effectively oppose them. Those ‘smart’ cities are for the compliant who will go there willingly, believing it’s for the climate and their safety, and those camps, well it’s not difficult to figure who those are for. Remember the scenarios that played out over the past three years? Subtle threats about separating you from your children? (see here also and here, and here in NZ). Children are still missing from the Hawaii fires (here also).
Note, NZ’s equivalent of FEMA is now NEMA, since a week before the White Island eruption that is, when official safety / rescue folk decided not to rescue those victims and locals went instead, only to face prosecution afterwards! This also happened in the Hawke’s Bay flooding this year where folk went in small boats and even a helicopter to rescue folk.
Things have changed folks! And not for the better! Be vigilant!
Below is the article from Agent131711’s Substack. I recommend you read the many links to his other articles on the camps and FEMA topic:
FEMA Drill: DETAIN 500K PEOPLE AT A TIME …
Converting military bases to prisons and mass-arresting over a half of a million residents at a time, for your safety, of course.
Starting in the early 1980s, the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) began running large-scale readiness drills, such as REX84B. REX84B is short for Readiness Exercise 1984 BRAVO. It was a classified exercise developed by the federal government to detain large numbers of United States residents deemed to be “National Security Threats”, in the event of a National Emergency. The exercise was for rounding up over a half million people at a time.
READ AT THE LINK
RELATED:
Agenda 21 vs Agenda 2030 vs Agenda 2050 Explained
REFERENCES:
- https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/gov-predicts-us-population-drops
- https://nzdsos.com/2023/10/13/open-letter-to-officials-covid-19-injections/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2023/12/01/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new-zealand-ministry-of-health-shows-beyond-any-doubt-that-the-covid-vaccines-have-killed-millions/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2023/12/04/new-zealand-whistleblower-who-shook-the-world-has-been-raided-by-police/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2023/12/04/liz-gunn-further-reports-police-are-still-surrounding-the-whistleblowers-home-after-several-hours-following-the-raid/
- https://truthwatchnz.is/all-categories/agenda-21-30/maui-torching-according-to-a-report-by-ap-the-only-road-out-of-lahaina-was-barricaded-only-those-who-disobeyed-survived
- https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/chemtrails-chapter-11-fema-the-un
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7zeMgAeWsc
- https://envirowatchnz.com/?s=separate+children
- https://truthwatchnz.is/all-categories/general/since-nz-s-bomb-threats-of-july-this-year-there-have-been-at-least-four-more-incidents-requiring-lockdowns-in-schools
- https://truthwatchnz.is/cv-injection-nz/is-there-more-to-this-week-s-alleged-bomb-threats-than-meets-the-eye-6-nz-schools-experienced-emergency-lockdowns-that-have-raised-serious-concerns-for-parents-co-leader-of-outdoors-party-speaks-out
- https://odysee.com/@BradfromCarolina:7/maui-missing-where-are-children:d
- https://odysee.com/@Refbe:7/HAWAII-DIRECTED-ENERGY-WEAPONS-AND-THE-MISSING-CHILDREN!:d
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2019/12/11/white-island-and-the-new-nema-nzs-civil-defence-as-we-knew-it-closed-dec-1st/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2019/12/18/its-been-revealed-that-when-white-island-emergency-calls-began-police-rescue-services-decided-not-to-go-the-first-responders-were-nz-citizens/
- https://jobloggz.wordpress.com/2020/12/04/health-and-safety-charges-made-against-heroic-pilots-who-rescued-white-island-survivors/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2023/03/22/three-unsung-heroes-whose-quick-action-saved-dozens-of-people-in-the-hawkes-bay-flooding-beware-though-rescuing-folk-could-now-find-you-prosecuted/
- https://envirowatchnz.com/2023/03/03/hawkes-bay-orchardist-saving-people-with-his-helicopter-threatened-by-civil-aviation/
- https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/fema-drill-detain-500k-people-at?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1865725&post_id=138081490&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email
- https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/agenda-21-vs-agenda-2030-vs-agenda
- https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html
Image by ErikaWittlieb from Pixabay
Save the earth and better yourself: 8 reasons why growing your own food is the best decision you will ever make (Wally Richards)
Hello Readers
It has been a very busy week with the pre-sales of my new book ‘Gardening with Wally Richards’ and to date over 200 copies have been spoken for which is wonderful.
The books purchased will start being sent out on the 11th December.
Below is an article I wrote sometime ago and the information is very important for you and your family.
Save the earth and better yourself: 8 reasons why growing your own food is the best decision you will ever make.
I received an email article from Natural News.com which echoes much of what I have been encouraging people to do for many years.
The following is what they have to say:
(Natural News) Have you ever thought of growing your own fruits and vegetables? If not, now is the time to start considering it.
It may seem tedious and overwhelming, but in reality it is actually easy and simple. You can start by growing them in your backyard, or if you do not have any yard, consider container gardening in your balcony, patio, or on a windowsill.
Still not convinced? Here are eight reasons on why you should start growing your own food.
1/ Have a healthier family – Nothing can beat the freshness of fruits and vegetables that are homegrown.
Serving your family fresh fruits and vegetables is one of the most valuable things you and your family can do to be healthy.
Fruits and vegetables grown in your backyard are the best because you harvest them straight from your garden and eat them fresh.
Another proven health benefit of homegrown produce was shown in a study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association.
Results of the study showed that preschool children who almost always ate homegrown produce were more than two times likely to eat five servings of fruits and vegetables per day than those kids who rarely or never ate homegrown produce.
2/ Spend less on groceries – Growing your own food will help you save money and ensure you food security as you will not have to buy fruits and vegetables from the supermarket.
Most fruits and vegetables from the supermarket have already lost their nutritional value as they have been stored for a long time.
With less than a dollar, you can buy a packet of seeds and start planting your own produce.
3/ Help the environment – By growing your own produce, you are already helping the environment in different ways.
One way is growing your food without using pesticides and herbicides.
This lessens air and water pollution. You will also help reduce the use of fossil fuels.
Moreover, pollution from the transportation of fresh produce from around the world to the supermarket will also be lessened.
4/ Increase your physical activity – Since you will be doing all the planting, weeding, watering, and harvesting, you are also exercising at the same time.
Remember to warm up and stretch your muscles before and after gardening though!
Exercising also helps you relax, de-stress, refresh your mind, inhale fresh air, and get vitamin D.
5/ Indulge in more tasty food – Nothing beats the freshness of picked out fruits and vegetables straight from the backyard.
A study found that homegrown tomatoes are sweeter and richer in nutrients than those sold in the supermarket.
6/ Have a sense of accomplishment – Witnessing the seed you planted grow and become the food that you and your family can enjoy is satisfying.
Home gardening helps you thrive, nourish your family, and improve health.
There is a sense of accomplishment and self-satisfaction in growing your own food.
7/ No more worries on food safety – Because you know how your plants are grown, you don’t have to worry about food safety.
With backyard gardening, you have control over the chemicals and products used during the growing process.
8/ Reduce food waste – You are less likely to throw away food. You’ll only pick what you need.
And, you wouldn’t want your time, effort, and hard work go to waste, right? End.
During the week a lady gardener rang with a couple of questions and during the conversation she told me that a friend had given her a freshly cut broccoli out of their garden. That night she cooked the broccoli and added it to the evening meal.
Her husband wanted to know what the name of the delicious vegetable that looked like a broccoli was.
He could not remember ever eating any vegetable that tasted so good.
He was told it was their friend’s Home Grown Broccoli. He wished that they were able to buy vegetables that tasted that good.
Goodness equals Taste, you grow a few vegetables without chemicals in your garden using only natural plant foods and minerals and picked fresh the taste is amazing.
Not only is the taste amazing your body is getting the minerals and nutritional goodness that you need to be healthy.
Your savings are immense, no need to purchase sauces and condiments that you need to put into your meals to make the bland food appear tasty (they are just chemical sugars, salts and fats anyway and bad for your health).
You save on health related costs, doctors, pharmacy products, time off work or school and possible hospital costs.
Often children with behavior aspects will improve.
Besides you cannot put a cost on poor health which is the ultimate cost of eating a food chain that lacks in fundamental goodness replaced by a list of chemical poisons likely as long as your arm.
Our conventional food chain is Insidious.
If you are not familiar with the meaning of the word it is: proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with very harmful effects.
Conventionally grown produce not only lacks in taste and goodness it goes off far quicker than natural home grown produce.
The reason is that it is already going off before it was even harvested.
They are weak plants having grown and sustained by chemical poisons.
Example strawberries conventionally grown look great, big berries but bland to the taste so we have to slice them and sprinkle icing sugar over them to make them taste good.
Home grown and they are sweet as; picked ripe off the plant. Plus they are full of minerals and antioxidants to make your immune system strong and you healthy.
Tomatoes conventionally grown lacking in flavour and bland need salt to make them appealing.
Home grown wow taste the difference.. Now thats a real tomato.
Another important aspect is that home grown produce is very filling and you dont need to eat much before you feel satisfied.
The reason is because your body has received its requirements and is happily utilizing the bounty of nutrients to fortify your organs and immune system.
Conventional food chain you eat a big meal and afterwards you still feel hungry.
Its not long before you are munching on some chippies or something to try and satisfy your hunger feelings.
Reason is your body has not received its list of needs for being healthy and is calling out for them so you stuff some more rubbish in and the best you achieve is being over weight and sickly.
You would excise to get rid of the fat but you dont have the energy (except for the sugars you consume) and besides you feel lethargic with the poisons your body is trying to cope with.
Not feeling so good best see the doctor who can prescribe some pharmaceutical chemicals to your Pandora’s box of chemicals.
Once upon a time the medical person would have inquired on your diet and likely suggested more fruit and vegetables but that was 50 odd years ago when the commercially grown produce had a lot more goodness than today.
Wallys formula: The more goodness (nutritional values) equals greater taste.
Home grown using natural elements means very healthy you and family.
You can be healthy and happy.
Phone 0800 466464
Garden Pages and News at www.gardenews.co.nz
Shar Pei pages at www.sharpei.co.nz
Mail Order products at www.0800466464.co.nz
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:
1The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)
2The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)
3The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)
4The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)
Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion.
This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief,
INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)
Image by Alexander Fox | PlaNet Fox from Pixabay
Liz Gunn further reports police are still surrounding the Whistleblowers’ home after several hours following the raid
For a full list of links on topic go HERE
UPDATES (latest first):
New Zealand Jab Data Whistleblower interviewed after being released from prison
NZ Whistleblower Arrested for Exposing the Truth: Here’s What They Didn’t Want You to See (Liz Gunn fleeing for safety)
“Winston Smith” arrested by New Zealand police
Watch at the link
New Zealand Whistleblower who Shook the World has Been Raided by Police
For a full list of links on topic go HERE
From Karen Kingston @ substack
December 3, 2023: Breaking News -New Zealand Reporter, Liz Gunn, reports that the whistleblower exposing the catastrophic deaths caused by the COVID-19 injection in New Zealand (120 or more deaths per day since the COVID-19 injection rollouts) has been raided by the police, as has one of his colleagues.
Liz Gunn is calling on global civilians and Winston Peters to put pressure on the new New Zealand government to stand up for truth and whistleblowers by calling off the police and freeing the whistleblower and his associates immediately.
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
New Zealand Whistleblower who Shook the World has Been Raided by Police
Karen Kingston
Dec 3 READ IN APP December 3, 2023: Breaking News -New Zealand Reporter, Liz Gunn, reports that the whistleblower exposing the catastrophic deaths caused by the COVID-19 injection in New Zealand (120 or more deaths per day since the COVID-19 injection rollouts) has been raided by the police, as has one of his colleagues. Liz Gunn is calling on global civilians and Winston Peters to put pressure on the new New Zealand government to stand up for truth and whistleblowers by calling off the police and freeing the whistleblower and his associates immediately.More information on the whistleblower and the data he exposed can be viewed on Rumble and on Steve Kirsch’s SubStack. This is a link to groundbreaking New Zealand data that shook the world (120 deaths per day in NZ),Please share this post. It may help prevent further persecution of the whistleblowers.
SOURCE
NBC’s Antonia Hylton has “rare cancer”; Amy Robach, who has cancer, mourns cancer death of Olivia Summer Hutcherson; “Shannon Doherty reveals cancer has spread to her bones”; Dario G has rectal cancer
Suleika Jaouad, John Batiste’s wife, undergoes chemotherapy (on TV); soap star Christian LaBlanc “shares cancer update”; “Young tennis player collapses during press conference in frightening scene”
NBC News correspondent Antonia Hylton is sharing for the first time that she was diagnosed with a rare type of cancer, a neuroendocrine tumor.
As a journalist on the road, Hylton, 30, was used to waking up feeling out of sorts. But, about two years ago, she started having constant stomach issues.
Hylton tells TODAY.com that she recalls not being able to have a bowel movement for days, and when she finally was able to, “the pendulum swung in the other direction, almost like I couldn’t leave the bathroom.”
Knowing that Black people have the highest rate of colon cancer in the U.S. and that she has a family history of colon cancer, Hylton said, “I went to see a specialist who sent me for a colonoscopy.”
READ AT THE LINK
RELATED: The many other celebrity deaths and injuries
Photo: pixabay.com
Data from US Medicare and the New Zealand Ministry of Health shows, beyond any doubt, that the COVID vaccines have killed millions
For a full list of links on topic go HERE
RELATED: They’re Killing Our People: The Evidence!
It’s finally here: record-level data showing vaccine timing and death date. There is no confusion any longer: the vaccines are unsafe and have killed, on average, around 1 person per 1,000 doses.
Executive summary
Today you will get to see the data that nobody wants you to see. FINALLY.
No State or country has ever released record-level public health data on any vaccine.
Privacy is not the reason for this; the data can be easily obfuscated (which we did on this data) so that no record entry would match that of any person, living or dead.
The reason the data is kept secret is simple: it would expose the fact that the COVID vaccines are unsafe, as well as all the vaccines that I have been able to get record-level data on.
Today, thanks to a courageous whistleblower who works at the New Zealand Ministry of Health, we have record-level information from a large population of all ages and are making it public for the first time in history.
Here is the Rumble video announcing the leak:
There was a YouTube link as well, but YouTube censored it within minutes of posting, just like we knew they would.
Just as you suspected, the COVID vaccines have killed millions of people worldwide, an estimated 1 death per 1,000 doses on average in a standard population.
And now we have the data to prove it.
The MIT slide presentation
You can read my “Is it safe?” MIT presentation slides here. I highly recommend reading the slides and/or watching the livestream. I tried to make the slides self-standing, but the livestream can be helpful in explaining some of the slides.
I also periodically dump a PDF version of the presentation to my skirsch.com web server. The PDF version is searchable and you can copy/paste text from it (such as the access keys for the Wasabi server so you can download all the goodies).
The MIT talk livestream links
Here is the Twitter livestream.
Here is the Rumble livestream.
Downloading the data
The presentation has everything you need including the credentials to download all the data (search for “Wasabi” in the PDF version of the slide deck).
Here are the Wasabi credentials to make it easy:
Public API keys:
access-key= BDBT2BD1KKIXKPWY3030
secret-key= 5GQVqz9uDsmrYjLuNW24tRPzwPuPe0TTleUdpSF3
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. Trust me, there’s more that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than Medicare).
Wasabi explorer downloads are here for PC and Mac. You can also use CyberDuck or any other S3-compatible browser. Make sure your destination folder is writable when you copy files from the server.
You can also use rclone to make a local copy of the repository on your system:
mysystem% rclone config
mysystem% rclone -sync wasabi:/data-transparency /mylocal/file/destination-dir
What you will find
- The data: All the data in the data-transparency bucket is sanitized. Any matches to actual records is completely accidental. The data was sanitized in a way that preserves the statistics. We ran the bucket analysis on the original and obfuscated data and got nearly identical results. There is no reason any health authority couldn’t do the same thing we did.
- The tools: We’ll give you our time-series cohort analysis software. This is the software that you’ll never get your State epidemiologist to use. Now, armed with record-level data, you can do your own analysis. We’ve made it super easy to use. When done, paste the output file into our v4 analysis .xlsx spreadsheet and you’ll see instantly whether the vaccine is safe or not.
- The analysis documents: You’ll find annotated spreadsheets as well as word documents.
- The description of the data: You’ll find documents describing the dataset (size, dates, average ages in each cohort, what the authorities claim, etc.
I encourage you to explore. Everything is “legal” in that jurisdiction. So you’ll see the full times of people who died in the Maldives, for example. In other places, the names are omitted.
Introduction
I was provided the data on November 8, 2023 when it was uploaded to my Wasabi file server.
I was asked by the whistleblower to keep the data confidential until November 30 in order to give the whistleblower time to work out the logistics of how the data would be made public.
I honored my commitment and only shared it with a handful of colleagues including Norman Fenton and his associates in the UK with the whistleblower’s consent.
The data from New Zealand is not perfect; it is not a complete sample. For example, for some people, the first record in the database is Dose #3. Also, only vaccinated people are in the database.
But, by using a cohort time-series analysis, it doesn’t matter. There is no possible way that this data is consistent with a safe vaccine. I estimated that the vaccine killed, on average, about 1 person per 1,000 doses. That means an estimated 675,000 Americans were killed by the COVID vaccines.
We have confirmation of the analysis from the US Medicare data thanks to another whistleblower.
The story of the data can be found in my presentation which has a link to the Wasabi server and access credentials, as well as how to download the free Wasabi File Explorers for PC and Mac. There is a large amount of data and analysis uploaded to the servers.
The cohort time-series analysis takes about 2 hours to run on the data. We’ve included the output files so you can start from that.
Analyzing the data takes about 5 minutes using the v4 spreadsheet in the analysis directory. Anyone can do it. You just plug in numbers to vary the parameters to look at anything you want to investigate. It has 8 visualizations: 4 main graphs (one for each independent variable) and 4 below each graph showing the number of deaths so you can use that to judge the reliability of the data points in the graph above.
Be sure to read the entire presentation to understand how to interpret the data.
Papers about the data
Papers will be coming out from various authors over the coming weeks. See this article which I will update over time.
Summary of what we found
Record level vaccination-date/death data obtained from a whistleblower in the New Zealand Ministry of Health was analyzed using a standard time-series cohort analysis. The results remained consistent even after varying all four of the key independent variables (observation time window, days after shot, age, and dose number). The only way that can happen is if the COVID vaccines significantly increased mortality for those aged 60 and older, the very population that the vaccine was supposed to help. All five Bradford Hill causality criteria are satisfied. From this data, we can accurately estimate that overall, the mRNA vaccines led to the premature death of more than 1 person per 1,000 doses on average over all doses.
This estimate is supported by COVID death data from Medicare obtained from another whistleblower. The data from Medicare was stunning: the number of people who died rose monotonically for those who got shot in 2021 or 2022. My whistleblower inside HHS had never seen anything like that before. It was a perfectly straight line sloping upwards for 365 days since the dose was given. A safe vaccine would see a decline in deaths by 4% to 5% after 1 year from the shot. The COVID vaccines had a 26% mortality increase, a net difference of 30%. This makes the COVID vaccine a competitor to heart disease as the leading cause of death among the elderly (which kills 20% of people per year).
The COVID vaccines are the deadliest vaccine of all time, killing an estimated 13 million people worldwide.
The precautionary principle of medicine requires that a vaccine which results in such a large net increase in all-cause mortality should be immediately revoked worldwide unless there is a more likely explanation for this “gold-standard” data. Nobody has come forward with a better explanation that fits all the data. In fact, nobody on the other side even wants to see this data: the FDA, CDC, Moderna, and Pfizer all refused to look at it. How is that responsible? That is reprehensible.
Researchers could have discovered the harms of these vaccines years earlier if any of the world’s health authorities released comparable record-level data to that released here. It is baffling to us why the medical community who is sworn to do no harm is not insisting on seeing any record-level data before recommending the use of any vaccine to their patients. It is the record-level data that is key to understanding whether a vaccine is safe or not. This is always hidden from public view.
Hidden from view?!?!
Clinical outcomes are never improved by keeping public health data hidden from public view. Yet every health authority in the world has kept this critical record-level safety data hidden from view.
And, to our knowledge, only one authority, the UK Office of National Statistics, had supplied even the most basic time-series analysis for a limited amount of time. The UK time-series analysis confirms the monotonic increase in mortality after each shot is given. But the UK ONS got to pick the bucket sizes whereas when we do the analysis, we have buckets for every week so we can see exactly what is going on. They can’t. And the ONS stopped responding to me when I asked to see the record-level data.
Other health authorities apparently refused to analyze their own data themselves to look for any safety signals which we found in abundance just minutes after receiving the data. After we received this data and analyzed this, we reached out to a number of health authorities in the US in Florida, California, and at the CDC and FDA. They all ignored the request to examine the data I obtained or look at their own data. This is the first time in history that vaccination-death record-level data has been made available to the public. And now we know why.
In addition, FOIA requests to the California Department of Public Health showed that they never analyzed their own data. There were no documents showing that they ever looked for any safety signals. They simply trusted the CDC even though the CDC doesn’t have any vaccine record level data, so it is IMPOSSIBLE for the CDC to do the proper safety analysis.
Finally, the safety signals are limited to those 60 and over simply because there wasn’t enough data to make a firm determination for people under 60; the data was simply too noisy because we were only given 4M of the 12M records in New Zealand.
However, since the vaccine provides no benefits whatsoever for infection, hospitalization, or death, there is no reason for anyone in the world to take these vaccines. See the presentation for details.
In any sane world, the COVID vaccines would be immediately halted and inquiries should begin as to why no health authority in the world did a thorough cohort time-series analysis on the data which would have uncovered the safety signal very early in the deployment. Are they all corrupt? Or are they all incompetent? Or both?
Can Moderna survive this? Why would anyone buy their stock?
These results have implications for Moderna stock as the failure of their underlying technology casts serious doubt on their viability as a going concern. Even if governments continue to buy their products, the breach of the public trust and the unwillingness of the company to look at the record-level data shows that the company is more interested in making a profit than ensuring the safety of their customers. A head in the sand approach to safety is despicable.
Pfizer is no different. Both companies were offered an opportunity to view this safety data and they all refused. So did the FDA and CDC. The offer was made by a respected journalist in the medical new community, not by me.
What did Professor Norman Fenton say about this new data?
Nobody should take my word on this. Those are my opinions based on examination of the data.
Anyone can analyze this data. Come to your own conclusions.
Finally, here is what famed British Mathematician Professor Norman Fenton said, “This confirms what we also saw in the most recent ONS data once.
Whatever uncertainty there may be in the younger age groups there is now no doubt the vaccine is increasing the mortality rate in older people.”
I agree. In spades. I’d bet my life on it.
Yale epidemiologist Professor Harvey Risch had this to say:
“I think that you’ve made a very strong case that the Covid genetic vaccines are associated with appreciably increased mortality rates for 6-12 months after each dose. This is particularly compelling in people over age 65. I am not aware of actual evidence that the increased post-vaccine mortality that you’ve shown has a different cause.”
The English translation of what he wrote is “the vaccines are killing people,” but scientists aren’t allowed to be blunt so they have to qualify everything they say.
This is how today’s “scientists” come to conclusions
If there was a mass shooting and everyone died, a scientist would want to have a control group and complete medical histories of each person (including a list of comorbidities) and then want to do a Cox proportional hazards analysis before concluding that the gunman could be the cause of death of these people. Without a control group, the scientist would be unable to say whether the shooting actually caused the deaths.
Nobody with respectable credentials wants to defend the vaccine as being safe
I offered to engage in a public recorded debate with anyone who thinks we got it wrong. Nobody was willing to do that to date, although Professor Jovo Vogelstein offered to give it a try to play devil’s advocate.
If you think we got it wrong, I have a $500K bet pending with Saar Wilf in Israel. I’d love to increase the stakes on that bet. Any takers?
Some people are just never going to figure this out
UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris has had the data for a while. He doesn’t agree with our analysis (as expected). But when I asked him to explain the Medicare data where the mortality monotonically increases every day for 365 days straight, he said he refused to speculate. Professor Morris never is able to see a vaccine that is unsafe. I proposed all sorts of unsafe hypotheses to him, and he said none of them were convincing. So in his mind, no matter which way the deaths go, even if they go sky high after the vaccine is given, you cannot tell if a vaccine is safe or not; there will always be a confounder that he will find. And he’ll always insist on getting additional data that is never available, so he’ll argue that all data, no matter how strong, is not good enough.
Nearly half of America has already figured out the COVID vaccines are not safe; they want to sue the drug companies!
Fortunately most people figure it out pretty quickly. Did you know that 42% of Americans would join a class action lawsuit against the COVID vax makers if they were allowed under law to do so? That is an unprecedented level of customer dissatisfaction. This is why I shorted Moderna stock. That is not a sustainable business. The markets will eventually figure this out.
Their attempts to gaslight you
Some people will try to convince you that the data isn’t complete and is confounded for that reason. That’s bullshit. If it’s a safe vaccine, you can be missing 99% of the shot data and still get the right answer. Doses don’t matter; a safe vaccine is like a saline shot: they cause no impact.
They won’t get away with stupid arguments like that with me. That’s why they won’t debate me.
Consider supporting my work with a paid subscription
I only have time to do this work because this is my day job.
If you liked this article and want to keep supporting my work, and are not already a paid subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber for just $50/yr or $5/month.
Your subscription fee supports the critical work that Substack has done in providing a free-speech platform, and also provides the funds needed to continue this work to expose the fraud and save lives.
Having trouble? Use the Contact me link
You can get support here using the Contact Me link.
Summary
It’s over. They’ve lost. The vaccines are unsafe. This data is the nail in the coffin. Gold standard, official records. There is no better ground truth than this. There is no comparable ground-truth data showing the vaccines are safe. Zero. There can be only one right answer.
If you think the vaccines are safe, accept my bet, debate me publicly, or release the record level data in your state. Nobody will do any of those things it seems.
Sooner or later top epidemiologists will weigh in on this data.
Now we’ll see just how broken science is if the world’s top epidemiologists cannot agree that the vaccines are unsafe. For example, will John Ioannidis weigh in? Or will he remain silent? Will Martin Kulldorff say anything? Or will he also ignore this data?
In the meantime, the medical community and mainstream media will keep recommending the jabs as if nothing has happened. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Photo: pixabay.com
Should You Get a Colonoscopy?
From mercola.com
Story at-a-glance
- For those at high risk, colonoscopies may be useful, but it’s important to weigh the potential benefits against the potential harms
- In one study, those who were invited to get colonoscopies had an 18% lower risk of colorectal cancer than the unscreened group, but there was no statistically significant reduction in the risk of death from colorectal cancer
- One analysis found a death rate of 3 per 100,000 colonoscopies, along with serious adverse events in 44 per 10,000, “with a number needed to harm of 225”
- Other risks include bleeding after removal of a precancerous polyp, perforation and anesthesia complications
- To avoid contaminated equipment, contact the clinic or hospital ahead of time to find out about sterilization procedures; you’re looking for a hospital that uses peracetic acid — not glutaraldehyde (Cidex) — to sterilize its flexible endoscopes
I’m 69 and I’ve never had a colonoscopy. I also have no plans to get one. While I believe they can be valuable in some circumstances, I feel confident that with my rigid avoidance of omega-6 linoleic acid (LA) and lifestyle it’s highly unlikely I will develop any cancer, let alone colon cancer.
For those at high risk, colonoscopies may be useful, but it’s important to weigh the potential benefits against the potential harms. Though they’re touted as the gold-standard recommendation for colorectal screening, colonoscopies are not risk-free, nor are they guaranteed to reduce your risk of colorectal cancer death.1
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends adults between the ages of 45 and 75 be screened for colorectal cancer every 10 years.2 As a result, about 15 million colonoscopies are performed every year in the U.S.3 Before scheduling your colonoscopy appointment, here’s what you should know to make an informed decision about whether or not this screening tool is right for you.
What Is a Colonoscopy?
During a colonoscopy, a doctor uses a thin, flexible, lighted tube with a camera on the end to view the inside of the rectum and the entire colon. Visual inspection is a reliable way to check for colon cancer, and if polyps, some of which may turn into cancer over time, are found in their early stages, your doctor can snip them off then and there.
So, a colonoscopy is not only a diagnostic tool; it can also serve as a surgical intervention. During the procedure, the doctor will take a picture of the polyp, clip it, capture it and send it for a biopsy. So, depending on your risk factors, it’s something to consider.
However, colonoscopy is not the only screening option for colorectal cancer. There are also less invasive stool tests, including the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which check for the presence of blood or antibodies in your stool. There’s also a FIT-DNA test, sometimes called the stool DNA test, which combines FIT with a test to look for altered DNA in your stool.4
Flexible sigmoidoscopy and computed tomography (CT) colonography, also called virtual colonoscopy, are additional options. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is similar to a colonoscopy but uses a shorter and smaller scope, so it cannot see as far up into your colon.
Many doctors fail to review the benefits and risks of each screening option with their patients, however, and instead only recommend colonoscopy.5 But there are significant drawbacks worth noting.
Colonoscopies Reduce Cancer Diagnoses — But Not Cancer Deaths
A 2022 study published in The New England Journal of Medicine found the benefits of colonoscopies are not as great as they’re made out to be.6
The Northern-European Initiative on Colon Cancer (NordICC) study — a randomized trial involving 84,585 adults between 55 and 64 years of age — assigned participants in a 1-to-2 ratio to receive an invitation to undergo a colonoscopy or to receive no invitation or screening. None of the participants had gotten a colonoscopy previously.
After 10 years, those who were invited to get colonoscopies had an 18% lower risk of colorectal cancer than the unscreened group.7 However, there was no statistically significant reduction in the risk of death from colorectal cancer in the group invited to screening. The researchers intend to follow the participants for another five years to see if anything changes, but according to the study:8
“The risk of death from colorectal cancer was 0.28% in the invited group and 0.31% in the usual-care group … The number needed to invite to undergo screening to prevent one case of colorectal cancer was 455 … The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in the invited group and 11.04% in the usual-care group.”
There were some limitations to the study, including a low uptake rate for those invited to get a colonoscopy. Only 42% of those invited to do the procedure actually did so. When the researchers analyzed the results based only on those who received colonoscopies, the procedure reduced the risk of colorectal cancer by 31% and reduced the risk of dying from colorectal cancer by 50%.9
Still, speaking with STAT News, Dr. Samir Gupta, a gastroenterologist who was not involved with the study, noted, “This is a landmark study. It’s the first randomized trial showing outcomes of exposing people to colonoscopy screening versus no colonoscopy. And I think we were all expecting colonoscopy to do better. Maybe colonoscopy isn’t as good as we always thought it is.”10 Even study author Dr. Michael Bretthauer said:
“It’s not the magic bullet we thought it was. I think we may have oversold colonoscopy. If you look at what the gastroenterology societies say, and I’m one myself so these are my people, we talked about 70, 80, or even 90% reduction in colon cancer if everyone went for colonoscopy. That’s not what these data show.”
Bretthauer suggested colonoscopy may, in practice, reduce colorectal cancer risk by 20% or 30%, which is close to reductions offered by other less expensive, and less invasive, screenings, including fecal testing.
Download this Article Before it Disappears
What Are the Risks of Colonoscopies?
Colonoscopy is a medical procedure with significant risks, including a risk of death. The risk of death from a colonoscopy from one source was 1 in 16,318 procedures evaluated.11 In the same analysis, the researchers also found 82 suffered serious complications. Another analysis found a death rate of 3 per 100,000 colonoscopies, along with serious adverse events in 44 per 10,000, “with a number needed to harm of 225.”12
Other risks include bleeding after removal of a precancerous polyp and perforation. A systematic review and meta-analysis found the risk of perforation after colonoscopy was about 6 per 10,000 while the risk of bleeding was about 24 per 10,000 procedures.13 However, the risks can vary significantly depending on where the procedure is performed and depend on the skill level of the physician doing the procedure.
The risk of perforation at Baylor University Medical Center, according to one study, was 0.57 per 1,000 procedures or 1 in 1,750 colonoscopies.14 Other complications related to anesthesia can also occur, including aspiration pneumonia, along with intraperitoneal hemorrhage.15
Across the U.S. 34.4% of those undergoing a colonoscopy used anesthesia,16 which increases the overall risk of complications. In the Northeast, use of anesthesia was associated with a 12% increased risk of complications, but this rose to 60% among colonoscopies performed in the West.17
Generally speaking, you should opt for the lightest level of sedation possible, or none at all, to reduce anesthesia-related risks. Those who have sleep apnea, obesity, high blood pressure or diabetes are at increased risk of anesthesia complications.18
Dysbiosis and other gut imbalances, caused by the process of flushing out your intestinal tract with harsh laxatives before the procedure, are another concern.19 Meanwhile, research suggests up to 25.7% of all colonoscopies are unnecessary,20 so you must carefully consider whether the risks outweigh the benefits for your individual scenario.
Contaminated Equipment Could Also Make You Sick
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/SBXVfk64Ls5a/ Download Interview Transcript | Video Link
How well the colonoscopy equipment is sterilized between patients also affects the riskiness of the procedure, as David Lewis, Ph.D., and I discuss in the short video above. One common issue is that endoscopes have expensive, sensitive equipment attached that cannot be heat sterilized. And, unfortunately, manufacturers have not been made to produce a scope that can be sterilized in this way.
As Lewis points out, “We can put a Rover on Mars, surely we can build a flexible endoscope that we can put in an autoclave.” So, during the examination, the physician may be unable to see through the scope because it’s clogged with human tissue from a past exam. In this case, the scope must be retracted and another one used in its place.
Lewis reports that up to 80% of hospitals sterilize flexible endoscopes with glutaraldehyde (Cidex), which does not dissolve tissue in the endoscope but, rather, preserves it. Then, when sharp biopsy tools are run through the tube, patient material from past testing is scraped off and potentially carried into your body.
This is why it’s important to find a clinic or hospital that uses peracetic acid, which is similar to vinegar, to thoroughly sterilize the equipment by dissolving proteins found in the flexible endoscopes. Before scheduling any endoscopic examination call to ask how the equipment is sterilized between patients. Specifically, you can ask:
- How is the endoscope cleaned between patients?
- Which cleaning agent is used?
- How many of your colonoscopy patients have had to be hospitalized due to infections?
Diet Is a Leading Cause of Colorectal Cancer
While screening for early cancer detection can be valuable in some cases, it’s wise to take steps to proactively reduce your risk of cancer development. For colorectal cancer, this means targeting your diet.
Aside from skin cancer, colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the U.S., as well as the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths.21 Lifestyle factors, including dietary choices, play a significant role in the occurrence and progression of colorectal cancer,22 with only an estimated 20% of cases caused by genetic factors and the remainder due to environmental reasons.
Up to 70% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are believed to be related to diet, according to researchers with the University of South Carolina School of Medicine.23 So, one powerful strategy is to focus your diet on whole foods, avoiding ultraprocessed foods as much as possible.
Processed convenience foods are linked to an increased risk of developing and dying from cancer,24 and they’re high in the omega-6 fat linoleic acid, which is found in many seed oils like soybean, cottonseed, sunflower, rapeseed (canola), corn and safflower.25 Higher intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) is also linked to an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors, leading researchers to suggest, “UPFs might be a modifiable target for early prevention of CRC.”26
Colonoscopies Are Not One-Size-Fits-All
While colonoscopies are often described as a universal solution for colon cancer screening, several factors — including your age and risk of colorectal cancer — influence whether or not you should get one. Be sure you understand the risks and potential benefits before making a decision.
And, remember to contact the clinic or hospital ahead of time to find out about sterilization procedures. You’re looking for a hospital that uses peracetic acid — not glutaraldehyde (Cidex) — to sterilize its flexible endoscopes.
Sources and References
- 1, 6, 8 The New England Journal of Medicine October 9, 2022
- 2 U.S. CDC, What Should I Know About Screening?
- 3, 7, 9 CNN October 9, 2022
- 4 U.S. CDC, Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
- 5 Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(7):575-582. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332
- 10 STAT News October 9, 2022
- 11 Annals of Internal Medicine 2006 Dec 19;145(12):880
- 12, 13 CMAJ Open. 2021 Oct-Dec; 9(4): E940–E947
- 14, 15 Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015 Jan; 28(1): 3–6
- 16, 17 Gastroenterology, 2015; doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.018
- 18 Medical News Today, January 5, 2018
- 19 Cell, 2018;173(7):p1742
- 20 Journal of General Internal Medicine February 25, 2022
- 21 U.S. CDC, Colorectal Cancer Statistics
- 22 JAMA Network Open February 16, 2021, Intro
- 23 American Journal of Physiology, Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology February 28, 2022, Intro
- 24 Imperial College London February 1, 2023
- 25 Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb; 21(3): 741
- 26 J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Feb 8;115(2):155-164. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac221
Excess Deaths among Children continue to rise in the Thousands across Europe following EMAs Emergency Use Authorisation of the Covid-19 Vaccine for Kids
By The Exposé
Excess deaths among children across Europe were negative compared to the previous average throughout 2020 and 2021 until the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extended the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) of the COVID-19 vaccine to Children.
Curiously, from this point onwards, excess deaths among children across Europe began to rise significantly up to the end of 2021 and have continued to do so throughout 2022 and 2023.
So much so, that thousands more children have lost their lives than expected ever since they were offered the Covid-19 injection.
n 2020, the first year of the alleged pandemic, excess deaths among children across Europe aged 0-14 were -511 according to EuroMOMO, the official database on deaths used by the EU. This means 511 fewer children died than expected.
This trend continued in 2021 up to week 21 with -330 excess deaths. This means 330 fewer children died than expected
But that trend was halted as soon as the European Medicines Agency extended emergency use authorisation of the COVID-19 vaccine to children.
The EMA did this on 28th May 2021, which just so happened to be week 21 of 2021, and here’s what happened afterwards –
Excess deaths among children rose significantly with 685 excess deaths being recorded by the end of 2021. Meaning 685 more children died than expected.
Sadly, the EMA also extended the EUA of the COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 5 to 11 in week 47 of 2021.
This new trend then continued throughout 2022, with a shocking 1,385 excess deaths. Meaning 1,385 more children died than expected.
And sadly it has continued throughout 2023, with 753 more children dying than expected as of week 45.
This means that 2,823 more children have died than expected across Europe ever since the EMA extended Emergency Use Authorisation of the COVID-19 vaccine to children.
But 841 fewer children died than expected during the entire alleged pandemic up until the point the EMA extended Emergency Use Authorisation of the COVID-19 vaccine to children, with minus-841 excess deaths being recorded.
It’s blindingly obvious that giving the Covid-19 injection to children has caused thousands more children to lose their lives than expected. But the Establishment and Mainstream Media will tell you it’s just another coincidence in a long line of “coincidences” that have occurred since the start of the alleged pandemic in 2020.
Gov Funded Clothing that Tracks, Monitors and Records You, Because You Can Never Be Too Safe…
From Agent131711 @ substack
“Smart Garments”: Yet another fantastic use of our tax dollars…
Our friends at the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (“IARPA”, another dreaded 5-letter) are designing “Smart Garments”; apparel that has the ability to track, monitor and record its wearer, because if there’s one thing the American public needs, it’s their pants spying on them.
These Smart Garments coincide with the World Economic Forums goals, so that’s good, two tyrants, one stone:
What makes the WEF even more delighted is that this project is being funded using our tax dollars, through the US Navy and Department of Defense. You can check out the government contract posting here.
GETTING TO KNOW YOUR NEW PANTS
I shit you not, they named them “Smart ePants”, because they want you to punch a hole in the wall every time you hear the name. According to their site, your new pants will be able to track your location through a GPS sensor system in addition to recording audio and video.
This will be us:
Their document goes on to outline the Smart ePants sensors capabilities, which include recording a full 60-minute audio conversation, cameras that can record two-minute videos in addition to taking photos at a 55 degree angle:
The GPS sensors will be able to log your location both indoors and outdoors.
And the location sensors will ping your whereabouts every 10 minutes. They want to make sure your location can be logged even without access to global GPS satellite systems.
According to their document, these sensors will be powered by the wearer
Which is quite interesting, because UMass, Harvard and other Universities have been working on this exact project:
I encourage you to read my post “1995: Dr. “MIND CONTROL Vaccines are Coming. They’re MAGNETIC. THEY WILL BE MANDATED!”, because we dive into Graphene Oxide being used as a conductor and a bunch of other horrifying shit.
What’s completely WTF is that, after I had finished writing this article, the strangest thing happened. I was at the mall, starting Christmas shopping for my son, and came across clothing… that tracks you… yes seriously…
So there I was, in the men’s clothing section of Macy’s, looking at this coat like it was the first time I had ever seen a coat in my life. There was a young couple staring at me, as my eyes were wide with shock, mouth open, holding this spy-coat like that that scene from Lion King:
I realized everyone was watching me, but I knew I had to add this to my Substack post, so I put the coat back on the rack and began discreetly photographing it, like a pervert taking pics of kids at a public pool.
These $350 coats feature reflectors that emit signals… without ever needing to charge them…
According to the manufacturers website, the reflectors signal is always on.
But don’t worry folks, this is just for skiing safely! There’s also DARPA’s “SIGMA+ Program”, in which Garmin, (the watch and GPS company) and DARPA are currently developing wearable technology that will “detect covid and otherdiseases”… using sensors that constantly scan you. Those sensors are linked to an app … an app that GPS tracks you and sends continuous information about you, your location and, allegedly, your health… No need to stick a swab up your nose and into your brain to learn that you’re sick even though you feel healthy. Now your watch can do it for you.
But don’t worry folks, that’s just for your safety too. It’s all for your safety. Safe, Safer, Safest. Even if you were locked in a padded room, with nothing other than a rubber eraser to play with, you should still wear your Smart ePants and your health watch because you can never be too safe.
This will be us in 2050:
Want to buy me a $350 coat that GPS tracks me using a reflector? Want to help me afford Smart ePants? Want to gift me a scarf that records everything I say then uploads it to Jeff Bezos’ Cloud? Feel free to put a dollar in my pocket and a smile on my face:
Feeling generous like a Sugar Daddy? I’ll gladly accept a coffee, whiskey or a $10 gift card to The Dollar Tree so I can splurge on myself for a day:
Buy Me a Coffee & Get More Comics
NEXT READ:
1995: Dr. “MIND CONTROL Vaccines are Coming. They’re MAGNETIC. THEY WILL BE MANDATED!”
Agent131711 and Sean M. Brooks, Ph.D.
OR, IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ABOUT BILL GATES HUGE BOOBIES, CHECK OUT:
Secretly Drugging Fresh Produce with Vaccines, Contraceptives and Other Medicines
·
22 Sept
SOURCES:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Advanced_Research_Projects_Activity
SMART ePANTS Proposers’ Day Presentation
SMART ePANTS Teaming Information (Compiled Submissions)
Anthro Energy Capabilities Statement
Battelle Memorial Institute Teaming Form
Bayflex Capabilities Statement
Electroninks, Inc Teaming Form
Mide Technology Capabilities Statement
Neotech AMT Capabilities Statement
Penn State University Capabilities Statement
Riot Energy Capabilities Statement
UES, Inc. Capabilities Statement
UMass Lowell Capabilities Statement
Wave Sciences Capabilities Statement
IARPA Leads First-of-its-kind Effort to Fashion Smart Clothing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_Advanced_Research_Projects_Activity
Image: Agent131711 @ substack
Undoing the Doubters of the Climax Hoax
The indoctrination of the climate change hoax has been so well prepared, and for so long, and with billions and billions of dollars by professional social and mind engineers (i.e., the UK-based Tavistock Institute) and with the collaboration of the entire UN system – it is virtually impossible to convince the smartest, most educated, and most honest people that they have been lured into a trap.
Even when they see that something is not quite right, their quiet inner mind tells them, “Cannot be; impossible that the government, and my scientist friends lie to me…”
It is self-denial – as self-protection.
Admitting that one has been betrayed for most of one’s life would be too shameful no matter how many others were lured and lied into the same trap. Admission, might be interpreted as meaning, that we are not smart. Nobody wants to be “un-smart.”
It is true, though, that over the past three decades or so, the lie-talk, coming from governments, international bodies like the UN, and repeated at nauseatum by the mainstream media, is so pervasive that doubting it is not only “uncool”, but more so, socially and politically incorrect.
Hardly anybody wants to be socially and politically incorrect.
You are soon considered an outcast. Nobody wants to be an outcast.
The truth is, today about 90% of the official narrative, emanating from supposedly expert institutions, and from the authorities paid by your taxes – are lies, false, fake, manipulated – so you will not know the truth, so you will obey the orders that follow the lies.
Let us illuminate some facts about climate change.
1. The climate changes all the time – usually in “waves” of 15 – 20,000- or so years, with smaller cycles in between. Therefore, climate changes are slow, so slow that life on earth can naturally adapt, without hardly noticing anything in our short human lifespan of some 80 years.
2. More than 90%, some scientists say, between 95% and 97% of climate change is caused by solar activities, which also come in cycles. Real scientists say that human activities, industries, cars, agriculture – even military (which the mainstream never mentions – in the COP meetings [see below on COP] it is strictly forbidden to talk about the military CO2 output) – produce less than 0.3% of CO2, unnoticeable because any excesses are absorbed by the seas.
The seas also release CO2 when forests, mainly rainforests, and trees in general need more for their survival – CO2 being vital food for trees, which, in turn produce the oxygen from which most life on earth lives. A perfectly balanced symbiosis. Mother Earth knows what she is doing.
3. The key is – there is of course an agenda behind the so-called manmade CO2 caused “climate change” when Al Gore made the round in the early 2000s with his propaganda climate speeches, including at the World Bank and other international agencies, it was called “global warming”, then the narrative changed because you can do more with a both-sided, cooling and warming, “climate change”.
This idea dates back to the Club of Rome, their infamous 1972 report “Limits to Growth”. The Club’s first objective, as stated in the Report, is population reduction by more than 90% so that the earth’s non-renewable resources will last longer for a small elite. As simple as that.
“Limits to Growth” is still today the blueprint for the Great Reset / UN Agenda 2030. So, the population reduction narrative is still alive and well – as you know. The eugenists, Gates and Rockefellers et al, are quite omni-present.
See also this – quite recent, from an author of “limits to Growth”:
READ AT THE LINK
https://www.globalresearch.ca/undoing-doubters-climax-hoax/5840114
Netherlands’ Land Grab: A new documentary records the Dutch farmers’ struggle against a regime that is attempting to seize their land
Comment: of course it is not about the fake climate change narrative … anybody who still thinks it is is greatly duped. EWNZ
A couple of weeks ago, Big Picture released the documentary ‘NITROGEN 2000: The Dutch Farmers’ Struggle’ to watch for free.
NITROGEN 2000 is a 45-minute documentary on the Dutch Farmer struggle of 2019-23. 70% of Holland is owned by small cattle farmers and since 2019, the Dutch government has been advocating a 50% forced buyout of their land. This amounts to a nationalisation of a third of the territory of Holland.
Is this really about lowering nitrogen levels to help orchids over nettles? What other darker designs lie behind the nitrogen policy of Holland? Surely if it were truly about nitrogen other solutions could be found than disenfranchising the most efficient farmers on the planet. In NITROGEN 2000 Big Picture gets to the bottom of the story.
Big Picture’s James Patrick initially went to the Netherlands to shoot two interviews for another film which was under production. While he was there, he got in touch with some leaders of the Dutch farmers’ groups fighting the government’s policy to forcibly buy out their farms.
When he arrived in the Netherlands, Patrick realised that a third of the farms had signs displaying “HELP!.” Upside-down flags were hanging everywhere. It quickly became evident to him that this was a much bigger event than most understood. “I jumped onto the story and aggressively shot an entire film in 6 days,” he said.
What is happening in Holland is a warning to the world of what is to come if we don’t put a stop to this expropriation of the Dutch farmer’s land.
This is a big story. The government of Holland – with European Union blessings – is seeking to forcefully purchase one-third of their territory, disenfranchising half of their cattle farmers.
As everyone knows, corporate media constantly demonises cows: they make methane; their burps are evil; they cause nitrogen to run off into waterways. But the insane argument the Dutch government is using is that the nitrogen in cow dung is settling on protected areas, called Natura 2000 and causing plants less than 1 ft tall to suffer because other plants that grow higher block the sun for the smaller ones. That the government would declare war on half of their farmers in the name of short plants. “It’s a joke, and they have no credibility,” Patrick said.
This appears to be a story of seizing land under questionable “environmental” pretences and removing the bulk of the Dutch farmers from the market, effectively taking them offline. In terms of production per hectare, Dutch farmers are the most efficient farmers in the world. If a large restructuring of the food system is being engineered, sandbagging Dutch farmers is a crucial step towards achieving that goal.
The documentary ‘NITROGEN 2000’ gets to the bottom of the story. Partick interviewed the top players in the story to help people understand this complex phenomenon in a world in transition. To fight for our rights and well-being, we must understand what is happening to us. “This is the mission of my work: to help people see the Big Picture,” he said.
The documentary is free to view, in several languages, but if you would like to make a donation to support the Big Picture’s work, you can do so HERE.
SOURCE:
Photo: pixabay.com
Is Your Gallbladder Causing Digestive Issues?
Story at-a-glance
- Your gallbladder is an abdominal organ that stores and concentrates bile produced by your liver. The bile helps your body break down and absorb the fat that you eat. When you eat a fatty meal, your gallbladder will contract and squeeze more concentrated bile into the small intestine to aid in the breakdown of the fat
- Since your gallbladder is involved in the breakdown of dietary fats, digestive problems — especially when eating fatty foods — can be indicative of a problem, even if you have no other symptoms. Digestive symptoms include frequent abdominal bloating, gas, nausea and/or diarrhea shortly after eating
- Gallstones are one of the most common types of gallbladder problems that can occur, affecting an estimated 15% of the U.S. population. Women are twice as likely as men to develop them, especially during pregnancy or if using birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy
- One of the reasons for this gender difference is because the extra estrogen increases cholesterol while simultaneously slowing down gallbladder emptying. Obesity, diabetes, Crohn’s disease, liver cirrhosis, sickle cell disease, intravenous feeding, a family history of gallstones, use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, high-fat/low-fiber diets and fasting are also risk factors
- While your gallbladder performs an important function, you can live without it. Your liver still produces and sends bile into your duodenum, so you can still break down fats to a certain degree. But it’s not as efficient, so people who have had their gallbladder removed are advised to limit the amount of fat in their diets and take digestive aids such as ox bile and digestive enzymes
Your gallbladder is a 3- to 4-inch long pear-shaped sack in your abdominal cavity located beneath your liver. It stores and concentrates bile produced by your liver. The bile helps your body break down and absorb the fat you eat.
When you eat fat, your liver sends bile directly into the duodenum (small intestine). Your gallbladder will also spring into action, contracting and squeezing more concentrated bile through the common bile duct into the small intestine to aid in the breakdown of the fat. Carbs and proteins are more easily digested and don’t need this extra bile.
Bile is made up of water, cholesterol, lecithin, bile salts (which break fats into smaller droplets that are easier for digestive enzymes to process) and bile pigments. The primary bile pigment is bilirubin, made from red blood cells that are broken down in the liver. This pigment is responsible for making urine yellow and stool brown.
Your pancreas also plays an important role in the digestive process. It produces and sends enzymes into the common bile duct via the pancreatic duct. Together, the digestive juices from your liver and pancreatic enzymes break down the food you eat into liquid form so that your body can absorb the nutrients from it.
Since your gallbladder is involved in the breakdown of dietary fats, digestive problems — especially when eating fatty foods — can be indicative of a problem, even if you have no other symptoms. Digestive symptoms include frequent abdominal bloating, gas, nausea and/or diarrhea shortly after eating.
Risk Factors and Symptoms of Gallstones
Gallstones are one of the most common types of gallbladder problems that can occur, affecting an estimated 15% of the U.S. population.1 Women are twice as likely as men to develop them, especially during pregnancy or if using birth control pills or hormone replacement therapy.
One of the reasons for this gender difference is because the extra estrogen increases cholesterol while simultaneously slowing down gallbladder emptying. Obesity, diabetes, Crohn’s disease, liver cirrhosis, sickle cell disease, intravenous feeding, a family history of gallstones, use of cholesterol-lowering drugs, high-fat/low-fiber diets and fasting are also risk factors.2,3
Gallstones typically consist of crystallized bile, and if large enough to block a biliary duct, can cause varying degrees of pain. Left untreated, the blockage can lead to cholecystitis, or inflammation of the gallbladder. Common symptoms of cholecystitis include:
| Sudden onset of severe pain in the center or upper right quadrant of your abdomen, under your ribcage. The pain is proportional to the pressure inside the gallbladder caused by the blockage and/or swelling due to infection | Pain that radiates to your right shoulder or back, between the shoulder blades |
| A tender abdomen | Fever and chills |
| Nausea and/or vomiting | Light or chalky colored stools |
A gallbladder infection needs to be treated to avoid gallbladder rupture, which can be life-threatening, gangrene, or a gallbladder abscess. Abscesses occur when a pocket of pus forms inside the gallbladder. In severe cases of cholecystitis, the gallbladder is removed, but milder cases may be treated with anti-inflammatory drugs.
This is why you want to be really careful with your gallbladder and at the first sign of symptoms treat it as if you didn’t have a gallbladder so you can reverse the process and not have it surgically removed as so many people do. Not much you can do after a surgeon removes it for you as no way are you getting a gallbladder transplant.
Other Types of Gallbladder Disease
Cholecystitis can also develop in the absence of stones, although it’s far rarer. Only 5% of acute cholecystitis cases are so-called acalculous, meaning there are no stones present.4
Acalculous gallbladder disease is thought to be caused by bile build-up due to a lack of oxygen to the gallbladder. In these cases, the gallbladder is typically removed. Other potential gallbladder problems include:5,6
| Choledocholithiasis — This is when a gallstone blocks the common bile duct, causing bile to back up into the liver. In addition to pain in the upper right quadrant of your abdomen, other symptoms include jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes), dark urine, clay-colored stool, nausea and/or vomiting. Treatment typically involves removing the stone with an endoscope. In severe and/or recurring cases, the gallbladder may be removed. |
| Polyps — Gallbladder polyps are abnormal growths on the interior wall of the gallbladder. Most people have no symptoms, and the polyps are usually only discovered during routine ultrasound or CT scans. Small asymptomatic polyps are usually left alone and monitored. Large symptomatic polyps, however, may require gallbladder removal. |
| Gallbladder cancer — This is a rare condition and little is known about its causes. |
| Porcelain gallbladder — This is another rare condition in which calcium builds up on the interior wall of the gallbladder, causing symptoms similar to those of gallstones. |
| Biliary dyskinesia — This is a functional disorder where your gallbladder’s ability to move bile into the bile duct is impaired. As a result, bile is backed up in your gallbladder, causing chronic inflammation. |
| Cholangiopathy — This term covers all diseases involving the bile ducts. Chronic inflammation of the bile ducts can scar the ducts, causing them to become narrow. This in turn can cause bile to build up either in the liver, gallbladder or both. |
| Liver cirrhosis — The buildup of bile in your liver can also result in liver inflammation and scarring (cirrhosis). |
| Pancreatitis — If the gallstone makes its way into the pancreatic duct, which intersects with the common bile duct, then inflammation of the pancreas can occur. |
Download this Article Before it Disappears
Can You Live Without a Gallbladder?
While your gallbladder performs an important function, you can live without it. In fact, many do, as gallbladder removal is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the U.S.7
While you can live without your gallbladder, your digestion will not be as efficient, so people who have had their gallbladder removed are advised to limit the amount of fat in their diets and take digestive aids such as ox bile and digestive enzymes.
Your liver still produces and sends bile into your duodenum, so you can still break down fats to a certain degree. But it’s not as efficient, as the bile from your liver is less concentrated. This is why people who have had their gallbladder removed are advised to limit the amount of fat in their diets and take digestive aids such as ox bile and digestive enzymes.
Fat malabsorption is also common among people with functioning gallbladders. Symptoms such as sticky stools, stools that float, frequent diarrhea, digestive upset, gas and/or soft foul-smelling stools right after meals, chronic dry skin and hair loss are common symptoms suggesting you may not be digesting fats properly.8
How to Improve Digestion of Fats
Whether you’ve had your gallbladder removed or not, you can improve your digestion of fats using:
• Bitters — Bitters help stimulate the production of bile to boost the digestive process. The first signals for bile production come from your tongue, so taking a tablespoon of bitters right before eating can get the flow of bile going.
• Betaine hydrochloride (HCI) — Betaine HCI — not to be confused with betaine or trimethylglycine (TMG) — increases the concentration of stomach acid, which is required for digestion of food. It also signals your pancreas to release digestive enzymes. If your stomach acid is too low, some of the food you will remain largely undigested.
• Digestive enzymes — In many people, the pancreas doesn’t produce enough digestive enzymes. In this case, taking a digestive enzyme supplement with each meal can help. There are five primary digestive enzymes, each designed to help break down different types of food:
◦ Protease breaks down protein
◦ Amylase breaks down carbohydrates, sugars and starches
◦ Lipase breaks down fats. If you have IBS, cystic fibrosis, celiac disease, no gallbladder or gallbladder dysfunction, you may benefit from higher levels of lipase
◦ Lactase breaks down milk sugar (lactose) in dairy products
◦ Sucrase breaks down sucrose sugars
Taking a blend of enzymes is usually ideal, as no single enzyme can perform all the necessary functions throughout your digestive tract. That said, if you have irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), cystic fibrosis, celiac disease, no gallbladder or gallbladder dysfunction, you may benefit from higher levels of lipase in particular.
• Ox bile — Ox bile, which is most similar to that of humans, is particularly important after you’ve had your gallbladder removed. Ideally, take one tablet along with a lipase-containing digestive enzyme shortly before meals.
As noted by biohacker Dave Asprey, you can also improve your digestion of fats by eating the right fats:9
“C8 MCTs (caprylic acid) … skips a few steps in digestion. You don’t need bile for your cells to use it. Having a little bit of caprylic acid every day will help your body replenish the fats it’s been missing out while you haven’t been digesting fats.
Eating more fats will stimulate your liver to produce more bile, which will mix with stagnant bile and thin it out. Eating high quality fats like avocados, salmon and coconut oil to get things flowing.”
How to Avoid Gallstones
While it’s still unclear why gallstones form, a number of lifestyle strategies are known to lower your risk, including the following:
- Get regular exercise
- Clean up your diet — Avoid processed foods and grains, keep hydrated, opt for healthy high-quality fats and eat more high-fiber foods such as fruits and vegetables
- Lose weight gradually — Rapid weight loss may raise your risk of gallstones
- Avoid extended fasting, not only will it help your gallbladder, but it will increase your health as fasting is not as healthy as I previously believed as it increases your stress hormones and worsens mitochondrial function
Sources and References
- 1, 3, 5 Cleveland Clinic Gallbladder Disease
- 2 Sante Chiropractic October 24, 2013
- 4, 6 Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2018-2021: Diagnostic Imaging – IDKD Book. Chapter 5
- 7 My Health The Digestive Process
- 8, 9 DaveAsprey.com How to Digest Fats Better
Image by Darko Djurin from Pixabay
Bayer Ordered to Pay $332 Million in Roundup Trial
In its ongoing saga of losses in lawsuits with people who say their cancer was caused by the herbicide Roundup, Bayer has lost another round, to the tune of $332 million.
Bayer acquired the Roundup lawsuits with its purchase of Monsanto. According to Reuters, this is the third such loss for Bayer in a month. The current loss reflects $7 million in compensatory damages and $325 million in punitive damages for Mike Dennis, who was diagnosed at age 51 with a form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Bayer paid $63 billion for Monsanto in 2018; since then, it’s settled lawsuits in the amount of $10.9 billion. It still has another 40,000 Roundup cases to go.
SOURCE:
8 Common Sources of Heavy Metals in Food
When you’re buying food for yourself and your family, you probably glance over the Nutrition Facts panel to make sure you’re making a healthy choice. You may even look at the fine print in the ingredients list, to see if there are any artificial additives or preservatives you want to avoid. What you won’t see listed on the label however, is how much toxic heavy metals you may consume per serving. Yet that is exactly what may be inside.
What we eat and drink is one of the primary points of exposure for heavy metals. These toxins make their way into the food chain thanks to decades of industrial pollutants entering the soil and water.
In the past, many experts believed this wasn’t a cause for concern. The idea was that the human body is perfectly capable of dealing with trace amounts of heavy metals via its detoxification pathways. But they were missing the big picture.
Are You Swallowing 5 Grams of Plastic Weekly by Doing This?
From mercola.com
Story at-a-glance
- The world now produces 299 million tons of plastics a year, most of which ends up in oceans
- People, on average, are consuming the equivalent weight of one credit card a week from water, seafood and other sources contaminated with plastic
- Both tap and bottled water contain microplastics and bottled water may be worse
- Marine life becomes entwined in plastic bags and six-pack rings and the plastic blocks their intestinal tracts. In humans, ingested plastic is thought to produce unwanted immune responses and other health problems
- Microfibers from synthetic clothing and the practice of using sewage sludge, so-called “biosolids,” as fertilizer add to plastic pollution
Editor’s Note: This article is a reprint. It was originally published October 26, 2019.
Anyone who reads my newsletter is well aware of the growing environmental catastrophe of plastic pollution. Microplastics from artificial clothing fibers, microbeads found in personal care products, broken down plastics from bottles, fishing nets, plastic bags and biosolids spread on cropland are a human-created nightmare for our environment, particularly our oceans, waterways, marine and bird life.
Disturbingly, while lobbying groups are fighting to restrict plastic use across the nation, others are fighting those same restrictions. One such organization is the Plastics Industry Association’s lobbying arm, the American Progressive Bag Alliance, which backs legislation that would prevent local communities from addressing plastic pollution.
As reported by The Intercept,1 the bill “would make it illegal for local governments to ban or restrict bags and other single-use plastic products — one of the few things shown to actually reduce plastic waste.” Eleven other U.S. states have also “enacted similar so-called ‘bans on bans,'” the Tennessean reports.2
We’re Ingesting and Inhaling Surprising Amounts of Plastic
Recently, a situation that looked like it could not get worse, has indeed gotten worse. New research shows humans, not just marine life, are ingesting microplastics at alarming levels.
A recent study commissioned by the World Wildlife Fund and carried out by University of Newcastle, Australia, finds people, on the average, consume the equivalent weight of one credit card a week — 5 grams of plastic.3 Primary ingestion routes are from water and seafood, according to the report.
There is even more disturbing news. While many are aware that municipal wastewater treatment systems are failing at filtering out microplastics — their filtering processes were invented long before the plastic explosion — bottled water is turning out to be no safer.
A recent study by the nonprofit journalism organization Orb Media found major bottled water brands like Evian, Aquafina, Dasani and San Pellegrino contained significant amounts of microplastics.4 And research published in Environmental Science & Technology suggests people drinking only bottled water may receive more microplastics than those drinking tap water.5
Other recent research6 suggests the average person is also inhaling 11.3 microscopic pieces of plastic each hour. According to co-author Jes Vollertsen,7 “This is the first evidence of human exposure to microplastic through breathing indoor air.”
Plastic particles identified in indoor air include synthetic fibers such as polyester, polyethylene and nylon, and nonsynthetic particles composed of protein and cellulose.8
How Bad Is Plastic Pollution?
Thanks to the throwaway mentality of developed nations, and even developing nations, plastic pollution is an urgent problem. It threatens fish, birds and water including in pristine areas completely free of industrialization. The world now produces 299 million tons of plastics a year, most of which ends up in the oceans.
In fact, it is estimated that our oceans will contain more plastic than fish by weight by the year 2050.9,10 Already, plastic exceeds plankton by a factor of 6-to-1 in some ocean waters.11
In a recent documentary that I wrote about, “Hunting for Plastic,” a videotaped autopsy of a deceased sea turtle by employees of the Ocean Cleanup project showed greasy, black plastic bags and other plastic objects that had been the cause of the poor turtle’s death, retrieved from its body.
Boyan Slat, a young Dutch entrepreneur, has invented an ingenious way to clean plastic debris from our oceans and organized the very encouraging Ocean Cleanup project.
One-third of the fish caught in the English Channel and 83% of U.K shrimp contain microbeads, solid plastic particles less than 1 millimeter in size that are added to cosmetics, soap, facial scrub and toothpastes and used in pharmaceutical technology. Several countries have banned the use of microbeads in personal care products,12 but despite bans, millions of microbeads already exist in the environment and, like all plastics, will not degrade for hundreds of years.
Download this Article Before it Disappears
Different Types of Plastic Pollute Our Environment
There are different kinds of plastic discarded in the environment but they are all harmful. Polycarbonate, polystyrene and polyethylene terephthalate sink to the ocean floor and damage it. Low-density plastics like polyethylene, on the other hand, float and accumulate into massive floating islands of trash, such as the notorious 618,000 square-mile Great Pacific Garbage Patch between Hawaii and California.
Microplastics from widely used polyvinyl chloride (PVC) absorb carcinogenic plasticizers like bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS), according to research in Science of the Total Environment,13 and BPA significantly increases the risk of breast cancer according to 2018 research in Environmental Science and Pollution Research:14
“Breast cancer is the second most common fatal cancer in women. Developing a breast cancer is a multi-factorial and hormonal-dependent process, which may be triggered by many risk factors.
An endocrine disrupting substance known as bisphenol A (BPA), that is used greatly in the manufacture of plastic products, was suggested as a possible risk factor for developing breast cancer. BPA has a strong binding affinity to non-classical membrane estrogen receptors like estrogen-related and G protein-coupled (GPER) receptors.
Based on animal and in vitro studies, results showed a link between BPA exposure and increased incidence of breast cancer. BPA has the ability to alter multiple molecular pathways in cells … Thus, the aforementioned alterations cause undesired gene stimulation or repression that increase risk of developing breast cancer.
So, restricting exposure to BPA should be considered to aid in lowering the risk of developing breast cancer.”
More Health Risks From Microplastics
Plastic pollution kills sea turtles and other marine life in several ways. They become entwined in plastic bags and six-pack rings, and ingested plastic debris blocks their intestinal tracts so they die of malnutrition. Microplastics in the ocean also develop a biological covering of algae that smells like food to fish.15 That means fish may be actively seeking out the microplastic mistaking if for food.
The harmful effects of microplastics on human health are also beginning to be revealed. According to 2019 research in Science of the Total Environment:16
“Humans are exposed to plastic debris via the consumption of seafood and drinking water, contact with food packaging, or inhalation of particles. The accumulation of microplastic particles in humans has potential health risks such as cytotoxicity, hypersensitivity, unwanted immune response, and acute response like hemolysis.
We investigated the cellular responses of secondary polypropylene microplastics (PP particles) of approximately ~20 μm and 25-200 μm in different condition and size to normal cells, immune cells, blood cells, and murine immune cells by cytokine analysis, ROS assay, polarization assay and proliferation assay …
[A] high concentration, small sized, DMSO method of PP particles stimulated the immune system and enhanced potential hypersensitivity to PP particles via an increase in the levels of cytokines and histamines.”
Microplastics in Drinking Water
As I noted earlier, wastewater treatment plants do not completely filter out microplastics. The potential of these particles for absorbing wastewater chemicals — as seen with PVC — and their small size present “unique toxicological risks for microplastics discharged” says a 2019 study in the journal Water Research X.17
And there is another, less recognized but huge source of microplastics in our waterways and drinking water: microfibers from synthetic clothing like fleece, acrylic and polyester. During washing, microfibers from these textiles are released, amounting to as much as 1 million tons a year.
Yet the Mermaids (Mitigation of Microplastics Impact Caused by Textile Washing Processes) project suggest special coatings and reformulated laundry detergents could minimize the toll of microfibers released during washing on the environment.18 Research in Water Research X confirms the role microfibers play in plastic pollution, finding more microfibers in more populated areas.19
“We demonstrate through source modeling that microplastic fiber loads in influent were consistent with service area populations laundering textiles given previously published rates of microplastic generation in washing machines.”
Microplastics Also Pollute Soil
Plastic pollution is not limited to waterways. The net amount of plastics polluting land is as much as 23 times greater than that in oceans, according to research published in Science of the Total Environment.20
Once called “sewage sludge,” — the solids left after water purification — “biosolids” are now widely used as fertilizer in the U.S. and other countries to grow crops. It should surprise no one that biosolids contain plastics, as well as PCBs, dioxins, pharmaceuticals, hormones, surfactants, heavy metals and disease-causing pathogens.
Once on the soil, weather, sun and other factors cause the plastic to fragment into microplastics. Scientists also speculate that Collembola — tiny insects in the soil — might also contribute to the problem by converting the plastic debris they consume into microplastics through their digestive processes.21
A British study of the coasts of six continents found sewage sludge, or so-called biosolids, contained an average of one particle of microplastic per liter.22 Much of the plastic load comes from clothing fibers from washing machine effluent, says research, and much of it ends up in storm drains and waterways.
What Can You Do?
While microplastics are now abundant in waterways, drinking water and seafood, there are many ways you can reduce the scourge of plastic pollution by not adding to it.
- Avoid plastic bags (including for snacks and food storage)
- Avoid disposable straws (reusable straws made from stainless steel, bamboo and even glass are widely available)
- Wash synthetic clothes less frequently and when you do use a gentle cycle to reduce the number of fibers released; consider using products that catch laundry fibers in your washing machine
- Choose a nonplastic toothbrush made from bamboo or flax
- Avoid disposable plastic bottles; bring your own reusable bottle instead
Sources and References
- 1 The Intercept July 20, 2019
- 2 Tennessean March 29, 2019
- 3 University of Newscastle June 12, 2019
- 4 Gizmodo March 15, 2018
- 5 Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jun 5
- 6, 8 Scientific Reports 2019; 9, Article number 8670
- 7 Vice June 17, 2019
- 9 Huffington Post January 19, 2016
- 10 World Economic Forum, The New Plastics Economy
- 11 Science, Why is the world’s biggest landfill in the Pacific Ocean?
- 12 beatthemicrobead.org
- 13 Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 1):671-678
- 14 Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(24):23624-23630
- 15 Proceedings of the Royal Society B. August 16, 2017
- 16 Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 17;684:657-669
- 17, 19 Water Research X Volume 3, 1 April 2019
- 18 The Guardian May 13, 2017
- 20 Science of The Total Environment Volume 586, 15 May 2017, Pages 127-141
- 21 Environmental Pollution Volume 225, June 2017
- 22 Environmental Science & Technology. 45 (21): 9175–9179
Image by Stefan Schweihofer from Pixabay
New Zealand medicine regulator extends provisional authorisation for Pfizer covid mRNA injection for two years
Comment: and meanwhile NZ excess deaths surge and those in charge stay silent … nothing to see here … EWNZ
From hatchardreport.com via expose-news.com
Medsafe, the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, announced last week that it had renewed Pfizer’s provisional consent to distribute its covid “vaccines” in New Zealand for another two years.
Meanwhile, as Dr. Guy Hatchard highlights, pressure is growing on the New Zealand government and the medical establishment to act responsibly to inform the public of risks, end vaccine promotion and repudiate the proposed WHO international health preparedness accord.
photo: pixabay.com
Steve Wozniak and C-Knight both have strokes; Brandon Cowperthwaite has brain cancer; John York’s cancer treatment; Kel Mitchell’s “medical emergency”; Wynonna Judd “hanging on for dear life”… but nothing to see here (Ongoing updates added)
More stunning silences from Lamestream and governments all … still think it’s safe & effective? …. Highly recommend you sub to MCM (link below) for regular updates on how the celebrities (many of whom helped push the experimental treatment) are faring … not too well going by reports …EWNZ
From Mark Crispin Miller @ substack
Alyssa Farah Griffin missing from “The View”; Stevante Clark has a “mild heart attack”; Cavaliers running back Perris Jones “carted off field after terrifying injury”
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak was rushed to a hospital in Mexico City after he reported “feeling strange” during the delivery of a speech, Mexican media outlets reported.
Mr Wozniak, who exited from Apple in 1985, was hospitalised possibly due to a stroke, Mexico’s Reforma newspaper said.
https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/steve-wozniak-hospitalised-stroke-vertigo-mexico-b2444234.html
“Tiny Pretty Things” Actor Barton Cowperthwaite Diagnosed with Brain Tumor
November 11, 2023
Tiny Pretty Things star Barton Cowperthwaite has been diagnosed with stage 2 brain cancer.
The 31-year-old actor and ballet dancer revealed on Instagram that he had been diagnosed with “at least a stage 2 glioma” but noted that the “fairly decent-sized brain tumor” has not spread to anywhere else in his body.
READ AT THE LINK
RELATED:
Brooke Shields had a seizure; Mark Chesnutt, Zombies cancel shows; Bret Michaels’ “cancer scare”; Bridgette Sampras has ovarian cancer; voice actor James Cathcart’s “cancer battle”
“Top Marine general hospitalized” (why?); KC Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes “has an illness”; VA Tech’s Gabriel Williams rushed to hospital; Alan Ruck drives into pizzeria; Clea Shearer is now “cancer-free”
UPDATES:
Mark Sheppard has SIX “massive heart attacks”; Billy Bean “battling cancer” …..and more
Photo: pixabay.com (text added)
What the NZ Dentist Saw and What the Judge Thought (Hatchard)
From hatchardreport.com
The Dentist:
My dentist friend received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in 2021. He and his partner developed cardiac issues, both have since struggled to recover their full health. They have been alert and informed enough to examine published evidence and concluded the vaccine was likely at fault.
This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share.
His subsequent experience at his dental practice paints a picture of vaccine harm that is sobering and truly frightening. He has 2200 patients; during the last two years, a great number of them have reported new serious health conditions as follows. These figures only include accounts that his patients raised with him in order to seek specific advice or help. It doesn’t include the many who suffered in silence.
Clinically recognised cardiac issues – 69 (not counting the significant numbers who have told him they are struggling but not having sought help).
Stroke – 5.
Cancer – 20. (Pancreatic cancer stands out in incidence).
Blood clots – 3.
Sudden death – 11.
READ AT THE LINK
https://hatchardreport.com/what-the-dentist-saw-and-what-the-judge-thought/
photo: hatchardreport.com
Bill Gates & his controversial connections to Epstein
The unelected United Nations has been quietly granted full regulatory control over the Internet
From expose-news.com
UNESCO Seeks To Regulate All Internet Content
The United Nations has been quietly granted full regulatory control over the Internet, allowing the unelected organization to censor or punish anybody who threatens to disrupt the globalist agenda.
While citing the need for “multi-stakeholder” regulation of the Internet, UNECSO’s 59-page bill is titled Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms. This is Orwellian Double-Think at its worst, promoting free speech that is anti-free speech. The “major threat to stability and social cohesion” is all about their stability and the social cohesion they want to force on the world. Now UNESCO will spawn a feeding frenzy of eager NGOs and government tyrants to promote and defend the globalist narrative. — Technocracy News & Trends. argues Patrick Wood from Technocracy News
Here is the UNESCO Press Release
Online disinformation : UNESCO unveils action plan to regulate social media platforms
Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO sounded the alarm on Monday about the intensification of disinformation and hate speech online, which constitutes “a major threat to stability and social cohesion”. To put an end to this scourge she unveiled UNESCO’s action plan, the result of extensive worldwide consultations and is backed by a global opinion survey underlining the urgent need for action.
UNESCO’s action plan is the result of a consultation process on a scale unprecedented within the United Nations system, with over 10,000 contributions from 134 countries collected over the last eighteen months. Over forty pages, it outlines the principles which must be respected as well as the concrete measures which must be implemented by all stakeholders: governments, regulatory authorities, civil society and the platforms themselves.
Representatives from independent regulators have already welcomed UNESCO’s initiative, and several of them – notably in Africa and Latin America – have indicated that they are ready to begin implementing these measures. To this end, UNESCO will organize the first World Conference of Regulators in mid-2024.
The Organization will also support its Member States in transposing this action plan into their own laws and regulations. To this end, UNESCO is mobilising dedicated funding, including 1 million Euros already pledged by the European Commission.
7 fundamental principles to be respected
UNESCO’s measures are organised around 7 principles which must be respected so that:
- The impact on human rights becomes the compass for all decision-making, at every stage and by every stakeholder.
- Independent, public regulators are set up everywhere in the world, with clearly defined roles and sufficient resources to carry out their mission.
- These independent regulators work in close coordination as part of a wider network, to prevent digital companies from taking advantage of disparities between national regulations.
- Content moderation is feasible and effective at scale, in all regions and in all languages.
- Accountability and transparency are established in these platforms’ algorithms, which are too often geared towards maximizing engagement at the cost of reliable information.
- Platforms take more initiative to educate and train users to think critically.
- Regulators and platforms take stronger measures during particularly sensitive moments like elections and crises.
Freedom of expression must be protected
“Our work has been guided by one central requirement: the protection at all times of freedom of expression and all other human rights. Restricting or limiting speech would be a terrible solution. Having media outlets and information tools that are independent, qualitative and free, is best long-term response to disinformation”, the Director-General underscored.
In particular, platforms must have teams of qualified moderators, in sufficient numbers and speaking all the main languages of their social media, so that they can carry out reliable and effective control of content that is posted online. They must ensure the transparency of the moderation process, including when it is automated through algorithms. They must also facilitate their use, in all the main languages of the country in which they operate, and report on complaints from users.
Sections of this strategy are also dedicated to the measures needed to guarantee electoral integrity – notably through electoral risk assessments, clear content-flagging and greater transparency of political advertising and its targeting – and to respond to emergency situations, such as armed conflicts and disasters.
Elements specific to the cultural sector have also been included, highlighting the risks faced by artists and the need for online access to “diverse cultural content” as a fundamental human right to be safeguarded – with reference to the Declaration unanimously adopted by UNESCO Member States at the MONDIACULT Conference in September 2022.
Global survey confirms the urgent need for action
The publication of UNESCO’s action plan is accompanied by an opinion poll conducted by IPSOS for UNESCO, with over 8,000 respondents across 16 countries where elections will be held in 2024. It shows that 85% of citizens are worried about the impact of online disinformation, at a time when social media platforms have become the primary source of information for a large majority of them.
The same survey indicates that 87% of citizens believe that this misinformation has already had a major impact on their country’s political life and fear that it will influence the results of their country’s elections in the next year. As a result, 88% are calling on governments and regulators to resolve this problem quickly by regulating social media.
Source Technocracy News & Trends
The proposed sale of Foxton’s Memorial Hall that former Horowhenua Mayor Feyen refused to sign off (an historical timeline)
Selling off public / council assets has been happening NZ wide for some time now. Foxton’s War Memorial Hall is one in question that, like the pensioner flat sale of 2017 many locals, including the then Mayor (Feyen) did not agree to.
Here in question now is the sale of Foxton’s War Memorial Hall. Download the pdf file for an historical timeline including the questions raised by locals as to why the hall should not be sold.
Document supplied by Linda Savage.
Photo: Justin Sytsma @ Google Maps
CIA is behind Deagel’s 2025 Depopulation Forecast & Official Excess Death Figures in the Millions prove it’s on Target & not just an Estimation
In a world where reality often seems stranger than fiction, the machinations behind global events can be an enigma wrapped in mystery.
One such intrigue revolves around Deagel.com, an obscure online entity known for its exhaustive data on military capabilities and eyebrow-raising depopulation forecasts for 2025.
We can reveal that recent findings appear to link Deagel directly to significant players on the world stage: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and The Rockefeller Foundation.
And current real-world data on excess deaths in the West strongly suggest Deagel’s depopulation forecast is not just an estimation but in fact, a target that is on track to be hit thanks to the deadly effects of Covid-19 vaccination.…
See NZ data excerpt below:
READ ENTIRE ARTICLE AT THE LINK
Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
Lahaina, a perfect storm or a perfect crime? (a new book by a local eye witness to the Lahaina fires – Corbett Report)
Burn Back Better with Shelby Hosana
SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/burnbackbetter/Shelby Hosana, co-founder of Unjected.com, joins us to discuss her new book, Burn Back Better, detailing her experience on Maui during the recent Lahaina fire and what the investigation so far has uncovered about the dark agenda behind the tragic events of August 8, 2023.
Thanks to Shane for the link.
CLICK ON THE IMAGE FOR VIDEO or WATCH AT THE LINK
A Short History of Virology
From Branton Kenton-Dau
branton@troublesaway.net
Continue reading or watch the video here:
https://www.troublesaway.net/a-short-history-of-virology-article.html
Virology is the study of viruses. Virologists define viruses as
replication-competent intracellular parasites capable of causing disease in a host such as a human.1
In other words a virus has the ability to reproduce itself, operates as a parasite on a host and in doing so causes disease.
The central problem for virology is that there is no scientific evidence that any particle that meets such a definition exists.2 In the words of Dr Thomas Cowan et al.:
Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology.3
How did this state of affairs arise?
If you are a scientist and you want to confirm that you have a particle that creates a disease you would follow the scientific method by:
- Purifying the particle in question. In other words, separate this particle from everything else;
- Run an experiment where you add this particle to a host and see if it creates a disease;
- As a fundamental component of your experiment have a control that is the exact same as the experiment with the particle in every way but without the particle.
If you found that the host in the experiment that contained the particle became diseased while the host in the control experiment did not you would confirm your hypothesis that this particle is the cause of disease in the host.
As we are about to discover in this short history no such experiment has ever taken place in the entire history of virology. Critically:
- no particle with the characteristics of a virus has ever been purified;
- no experiment has ever been performed with a valid control (i.e. the same experiment without the purified virus).
You can see why there have never been any experiments with valid controls – in order to have a scientifically valid control you first have to purify the particle. If you can’t purify the particle you can’t create a control that is exactly the same as the experiment except without this particle.
The purification of the particle proves you have something that exists.
The ability of your purified particle to cause disease while a control without the particle does not supports the hypothesis your particle is the cause of that disease.
Coping Strategies
In order to function in a profession where there is no scientific proof a particle with the characteristics of a virus exists, virologists employ two main coping strategies.
Change Language
Virologists change the meaning of words so that it appears they are dealing with a proven particle with the characteristics of a virus. For example, the common use of the word isolate means to separate something from everything else. But because virologists have not done this with any alleged virus, in the language of virology an isolate now means any sample that is assumed to contain a virus.
Far Far Away…
Each new paper claiming to have isolated a virus references previous papers that also claim to have isolated viruses. This continues right back to the first papers. As we shall see below, the pushing of the evidence that a virus has been purified gives the appearance of credibility but when investigated, provides no substance.
The Far Far Away approach is given greater credibility with the use of genome databases like GenBank4 where hypothetical DNA and RNA sequences of alleged virus are stored. All of these sequences are in silico, that is, computer generated models. None have ever been purified from a diseased organism. None have been demonstrated through experiments with proper controls to cause a disease. However, the ability to reference back to a database gives credibility to virologists who want to claim they have discovered a new virus based on a previously uploaded, purely hypothetical, genome sequence.
For example Dr Mark Bailey describes:
a branch of one of the imaginary coronavirus template trails leads back to one of the original claims made regarding the SARS-CoV genome, alleged to be the cause of the first SARS “outbreak.”
In April 2003, Yijun Ruan et al. submitted to GenBank their, “SARS coronavirus Sin2500, complete genome,” which became accession number AY283794.1.
However, this genome was invented not by directly sequencing alleged viral particles of course but by sequencing the RNA in a Vero cell culture experiment through, “both shot-gun and specific priming approaches,” with alignment to, “the mouse hepatitis virus genome sequence (NC_001846) as a backbone.”111
The NC_001846.1 genome was invented in turn in 1997 and was claimed to be derived from a virus that was, “obtained originally from Dr. Lawrence Sturman,” and sequenced, “using as templates, cytoplasmic RNA extracted from L2 cell monolayers infected with wild type MHV-A59, C12, C3, C5, C8, B11, or B12.”112
The assertion that they started with a virus appears to be based on Dr Sturman’s assurance that the sample he provided contained such a thing.5
In other words virologists cope with the lack of evidence that any particle with the characteristics they define as a virus by pushing the alleged proof of such a particle into the distant past.
Early Discoveries
In 1884, the French microbiologist Charles Chamberland invented the Chamberland filter (or Pasteur-Chamberland filter) with pores small enough to remove all bacteria from a solution passed through it.6 Virologists claim the discovery of a virus when early experiments using the filter showed that a fluid remained infectious when it was passed through the filter. In other words, because bacteria had been filtered out of the fluid it was assumed that some other agent, small enough to pass through the filter was the cause of the disease.
For example Dmitri Ivanovsky described this process in his 1903 treatise 1903 Über die Mosaikkrankheit der Tabakspflanze (About the Mosaic Disease of the Tobacco Plant)7 However as outlined above the filter process does not purify any particle alleged to be a virus.
Because no virus was purified Ivanovsky was not able to have a proper control of just the filtered fluid without the virus. However this does not stop virologists claiming Ivanovsky discovered the Tobacco Mosaic Virus.
In 1911 Peyton Rous at the Rockefeller Institute in New York published a paper called A Sarcoma of the Fowl using the same filtration method. In this case Rous ground up chicken tumours, filtered them and injected the material into other chickens. When some of the injected chickens also grew tumours Rous postulated the presence of a causative ultramicroscopic organism. In 1966 Rous was rewarded with a noble prize for his discovery of tumour-inducing viruses.8
From a scientific point of view all that Rous was able to show was that if you inject fluid from chicken tumours into other chickens these other chickens can also develop tumours. No particle with the characteristics of a virus was ever purified. Rous had a control which consisted of the unfiltered tumour material but as you can see this is no control at all. A valid control would be the exact same fluid but without the virus.
In 1954 John Enders and Thomas Peebles added throat washings and blood to cell cultures. As they saw the cells dying and breaking down they claimed this group of agents is composed of representatives of the viral species responsible for measles.9
I hope you are getting the idea. As before no viral particles are ever purified. Because they have no viral particles Enders and Peebles could not run a proper control for their experiment by watching what happened to their cell cultures when the same throat washings and blood without the alleged virus were added to cell cultures.
Try for Yourself
Now that you understand the fiction virology represents you may like to have a go revealing it for yourself from the following examples:
1. French-Canadian microbiologist Félix d’Herelle described viruses that, when added to bacteria on an agar plate, would produce areas of dead bacteria.10
2. Another breakthrough came in 1931 when the American pathologist Ernest William Goodpasture and Alice Miles Woodruff grew influenza and several other viruses in fertilised chicken eggs.11
3.In 1983 Luc Montagnier’s team at the Pasteur Institute in France, first isolated the retrovirus now called HIV.12
A. F. Chalmers in his book What is this thing called Science?, says one of the pivotal issues with virology was that it invented itself as afield before establishing if viruses actually existed:
In this instance, a virus particle was not observed first and subsequently viral theory and pathology developed. Scientists of the mid and late nineteenth century were preoccupied with the identification of imagined contagious pathogenic entities. The observations of the naïve inductionist did not identify a virus a priori, and then set about studying its properties and characteristics. The extant presupposition of the time was that a very small germ particle existed that may explain contagion. What came thereafter arose to fulfil the pre-suppositional premise.
Dr. Mark Bailey comments:
Because a scientific theory demands evidence that has repeatedly been tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, it is clear that “viruses” never even reached the stage of a theory. According to the science, they remain mere speculation.13
1 Dr Mark Bailey A farewell to Virology p.4 https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
2 https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-coronaviruses 0:50 seconds.
3 Thomas Cowan, et al., “The ‘Segling the Virus Debate’ Statement”, 14 Jul 2022: https://drsambailey.com/resources/segling-the-virusdebate/
4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ For flu sequencing see: https://gisaid.org/
5 Dr Mark Bailey A farewell to Virology p.36 https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virology
7 Dr Mark Bailey A farewell to Virology p.15 https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
8 Dr Mark Bailey A farewell to Virology p.15 https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/ quoting: “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1966”: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1966/summary/
9 Ibid page 17.
10 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virology
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.
13 Dr Mark Bailey A farewell to Virology p.20 https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Photo: pixabay.com
Pediatricians in US Can Earn Over $300 Thousand by Vaccinating Children – Virtual Reality Now Used to Increase Vaccine Uptake in Victims
Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Greg Reese has just published a report showing how pediatricians earn $400 for every vaccine injected into children under the age of 2, where the average pediatrician in the United States can earn over $300 thousand per year, which is usually more than their salary.
Insurance companies are paying doctors to fully vaccinate your children.
This incentive program for vaccinating babies can be found in the Blue Cross Blue Shield doctor incentives booklet. And specifies that every patient under the age of two that receives the currently prescribed twenty-four inoculations is worth a four-hundred dollar payout to that doctor.
For further motivation, they get paid by the hundred and they have to vaccinate a certain percentage of their total patients or they don’t get anything. Blue Cross Blue Shield rules say that a doctor needs to vaccinate sixty-three percent of their patients in order to qualify.
The average American pediatrician has about fifteen hundred patients and would have to have nine hundred and forty-five of them fully vaccinated in order to get paid. At forty-thousand for every hundred this works out to three-hundred and sixty thousand dollars.
This is why most pediatricians won’t provide care for families who don’t completely submit to the latest childhood vaccine schedule protocol. We are talking over a quarter million dollars which is more than the average pediatrician’s yearly salary. (Source.)
Not only is this incentive for pediatricians to kick families out their practice who do not agree to the full CDC childhood vaccination schedule, it is a major incentive to inject babies and toddlers with as many vaccines as possible during an office visit, which greatly increases their risk of death and injuries.
READ AT THE LINK
Photo: pixabay.com
The Human Meat Project: By donating your body for human consumption, you’ll help solve overpopulation & of course, climate change … they are deadly serious!
WE ARE to BELIEVE THAT WE MUST CANNIBALIZE to SURVIVE!
From stopthecrime.net
Comment: These psychopaths are deadly serious. You are even invited to choose your end date … for the ‘useless [ageing] eaters’ I expect … taking up valuable space & resources …. EWNZ
Quote from the humanmeatproject.com website:
Over time, the human population has increased rapidly across the globe, leading to a higher demand for food, especially meat products. With this increasing demand, land for residential areas has become more difficult to find and emissions from farms have risen every year, making the lives we lead less sustainable.
We believe that by donating bodies and/or organs we can make a change by creating alternative meat consumption options while addressing the value of a person’s body.”
Harvest Time:
“Our donors will be taken care of by our specialized team to make sure they are treated with full respect and care. Donors will be prepared emotionally and physically to enter the Harvest Room. Donors will be given time to spend their last moment as a person before they become Human Meat.
The donor will then be assisted in a painless and peaceful method of passing away, after which we will immediately begin the harvesting procedure and harvest the donor body and/or organs.”
Stop the Crime’s article on topic:
OUR OVERLORDS are Creating a Blood Sacrifice
Along with ENJOYMENT of People Eating People
WE DO NOT SURVIVE
THE GENOCIDE WAGED UPON US.
EATING HUMAN FLESH REWIRES THE BRAIN AND INCREASES ANGER
DO NOT EAT YOUR NEIGHBORS, FAMILY OR FRIENDS
Due to Climate Change and
TOO MANY People Using too much Stuff – we are told we can lower our carbon foot print by eating each other.
There are many folks that truly believe eating people will help save the planet!
Identify these People Eating Advocates and Protect Yourselves and Others From Them.
Read below as we are sold the merits of Cannibalism!!!
A Human Body CAN Feed Up to 40 People
In order to save the planet from the impact of our modern civilization and lifestyle, we have to make a change in our ideas about consumption and our dietary choices.
We face climate change due to waste, pollution, deforestation and overpopulation problems.
By donating your body for human consumption, you are taking direct action to help others and lessen the damage of the industrial age.
By consuming human meat, we create a change in both our life and the world. By improving the standard quality of life in every country and nation, we can give everyone in the world a good life.
Human Meat as Food Source
The practice of cannibalism is not uncommon in living beings. In both the animal kingdom and our human history, the consumption of one’s own species has existed.
During the discovery of the New World, Christopher Columbus brought back what could be seen as early evidence of cannibalistic practices in modern civilization.
The word ‘cannibal’ comes from the name the Spanish gave to the Caribs (Cannibales). The Spanish accused the Caribbean tribe of ritualistically consuming their enemies, but modern-day scholars have doubts that it actually happened. They speculate the Caribs were engaged in an anti-colonial battle with a host of European powers. Many historians now argue that the cannibalism rumors were just a propaganda tactic by the Spanish meant to provoke fear.
The word ‘cannibal’ was used as a derogatory term to describe tribal and native people, and became an indirect ethnic slur.
Human Meat Donation Mission and Vision
In order to save the planet from the impact of our modern civilization and lifestyle, we have to make a change in our ideas about consumption and our dietary choices.
We face climate change due to waste, pollution, deforestation and overpopulation problems.
By donating your body for human consumption, you are taking direct action to help others and lessen the damage of the industrial age.
By consuming human meat, we create a change in both our life and the world. By improving the standard quality of life in every country and nation, we can give everyone in the world a good life.
Human Meat Nutrition Facts
One body can feed up to 40 people*
*An average adult male 65kg, only meat
Human meat often understated for its nutritions, human meat protein and fat density could have the same or better than other convenient meat product like beef, chicken and pork.
As omnivore, human meat taste and texture is similar to pork, not to mention the quality could be more substantial(depending on Quality of Life ratings).
One body contains every essential amino, minerals and vitamins needed for daily intake.
Not only one body could feed up to 40 people, it also the most attainable resource for meat and fat consumption.
Quality Control
How we Select our Donors
We make sure our donors are healthy, and without any contagious diseases, health issues, or medications or substances which might be absorbed by people who consume their meat.
Health Risk
Donors who have medical conditions such as AIDS/HIV, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), hepatitis (HAV/HBV/HCV/HDV/HEV), cancer, tuberculosis, or rabies will be rejected in order to prevent risk to the consumer.
There are also other medical condition that might prevent donors from being accepted, such as diabetes, hormone treatments or mental disorders.
Rejected Donation
In case of rejected donation:
If a donor has any medical condition that can be transferred human to human, they cannot be a donor.
If a donor has an active cancer, they cannot donate up until the time the cancer has gone into remission or been removed and will have to wait a minimum of one year after the last treatment or procedure. If a donor has a partial remission, they will have to wait a minimum of one year after the procedure and will go through a medical check up to ensure no medications remain in the body. If a donor has gone through full remission after one year, they can be a human meat donor.
Quality of Life
Quality of Life is a rating system of human meat quality.
Every donor that has gone through our quality control procedure and assessment will be rated based on the quality of their life (health and wellness).
About Us
Welcome to the Human Meat Project, we are the human meat donation program. By donating bodies for human consumption, we are taking action to solve overpopulation, which leads to climate change and the greenhouse effect caused by the mass farming of livestock animals in order to feed the world.
At Human Meat Project, we value every body and every life.
We emphasize the source and origins of our human meat to deliver the diversity of our world and reveal the worrying differences of quality of life across the globe.
Our organization welcomes every nation to give back to the rest of the world. Hand in hand, we can help each other improve living conditions and the environment for everyone through this global movement.
We are calling you, humans, to wake up and take action now. We are not living individually and alone. We need each others to survive. Together we can create a world worth living for. Together we can build a world of humanity and solidarity. Every life is cardinal.
After visiting the link above listen to the link below
Image by Ji-yeon Yun from Pixabay
How many other dead New Zealanders have been similarly fobbed off, not investigated, not compensated and ignored?
From nzdsos.com
The Detailed Case of Garrett Utting: New Zealanders Have No Protections, Are Being Lied To, and Our Systems are Not Fit For Purpose
The following is the story of Garrett Utting.
He was 30 years old when he died in December 2021. He was young and healthy with only a history of galactosaemia which required a strict dairy free diet. He was on no medication.
He did not want to be vaccinated as he was well and at minimal risk from a serious outcome. He had no co-morbidities and was fit and active in a physical job outdoors.
His father initially supported his decision not to get the jab as he was healthy and the long-term effects were unknown, but he was also concerned that Garrett might lose his newfound employment and cadetship in horticulture and didn’t want him to put his career in jeopardy. He had already lost one job due to lockdowns. He suggested Garrett wait and see what his employer wanted and go from there. Unfortunately, his employer followed the government advice and required employees to be vaccinated even though the bulk of his work was outside by himself in the orchards and vineyards.
Garrett reluctantly got vaccinated on 13 Nov 2021. He did not complain to anyone of symptoms but would not have been likely to do so. He did call in to work to say he needed a day or two off on 3 Dec 2021 due to feeling tired, fatigued and needing to rest.
READ AT THE LINK
https://nzdsos.com/2023/11/06/case-of-garrett-utting/
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
Liz Gunn from NZ joins Maria Zeee to discuss an exclusive Whistleblower report that is about to be released
CLICK ON THE IMAGE FOR VIDEO
Liz Gunn from New Zealand joins Maria Zeee to discuss an exclusive Whistleblower report that is about to be released, which will not only crush COVID crimes but enable us to finally begin to hold the criminals accountable.
The single simple question that every mainstream doctor will run from – the one about the jab they cannot answer
From Steve Kirsch @ substack
I found it. A single question: “If the COVID vaccine is safe, can you explain this to me?” What happens is they respond with ad hominem attacks. They cannot answer this question. Ever.
Executive summary
The one question they can’t answer has been found.
They will either change the topic or start telling you how stupid you are.
The question: “If the COVID vaccine is so safe, how do you explain Fig 1 in this article?”
Background
I want to thank Dr. Graham Bottley for inspiring this. I finally have a single simple question that every mainstream doctor will run from.
Bottley is a “scientist” whose credentials are so formidable (in his own view), that he does not have to answer any questions. I asked him two softball questions and he avoided answering them and instead requested that I answer HIS question. I said “happy to, right after you answer my question.”
The two questions I asked in a DM to him….
READ AT THE LINK
You must be logged in to post a comment.