“The FSANZ rubber stamping of novel GE foods without any evidence of safety is highly suspect and poses a direct threat to the integrity and safety of the food chain, the environment, farmers and consumers” Claire Bleakley – GE-Free New Zealand
There are renewed concerns about the approval by Food Standard Australia NZ (FSANZ) of GE Golden Rice, following a ruling by The Philippine Supreme Court that Syngenta must “cease and desist” any commercialisation and propagation of the GE rice.
The Philippine Supreme Court has required independent risk and impact assessments to be undertaken and for consent from the farmers and indigenous peoples before progressing. 
But the GE Golden Rice has already been approved by Food Standard Australia NZ (FSANZ). In 2017 Food Standards Australia New Zealand approved the entry of Genetically Engineered Golden Rice into the human food chain.
“This is an important decision and acknowledges the concerns of MASIPAG and the civil society organisations who took this case,” said Claire Bleakley, president of GE-Free NZ.
FSANZ are charged with upholding safeguards for public health and consumer protection in an effective and transparent way and should enable consumers to make informed choices, 
However FSANZ approved the rice without any evidence of safety or traceability and acknowledged that the rice would offer no advantage to the public. 
Despite calls at the time for the safety data to be provided  the Food Safety Minister, Hon Damien O’Connor, said FSANZ did not require safety tests only industry assurance of safety. 
“The FSANZ rubber stamping of novel GE foods without any evidence of safety is highly suspect and poses a direct threat to the integrity and safety of the food chain, the environment, farmers and consumers,” said Bleakley
“FSANZ must recall the GE Rice approval in light of this significant decision by the Philippine Supreme Court which signals the legal basis for safety data to be part of genuine regulation.”
If you learn the plan you can make sense of what is happening now. This little known report from 1963 explains for instance why we have wars. Or rather, why ‘they’ must have continuing war. WW3 will be the last as wars will no longer be necessary. By then the world will all be under tight control. Sounding familiar?
A look inside what is happening with digitized books and who can access them. There’s clearly more to the quiet disappearance of hard copies than meets the eye. Brilliant research as always by Truthstream Media.
There is a crew of volunteers there on the ground who receive no public funding, assisting locals with the clean up. They are from the group called Man Up (all info & links in video notes).
To briefly summarize (and you can listen to the finer detail for yourself) those who have officially been accounted for as passed are those who have been identified by family and friends. However, as the presenter in the video states … “if you talk to the community in general the picture’s a lot different…. we’re speaking to communities that say there’s still hundreds missing”.
As reported in our recent article citing other eye witness testimonies, the mainstream narrative is totally at odds with this. Whose testimony do you think would be the most reliable? In the above link a helicopter pilot reported seeing hundreds in the flood waters.
We now have a ‘system’ that persecutes those who do what normal humans do … run to the rescue, without hesitation … witness the helicopter pilot now being threatened by Civil Aviation for doing so! (See here also, it’s not the first time in NZ).
Note: Lamestream media is now in damage control mode warning about ‘conspiracy’ theories… as truth comes out. This article cites many links to eye witness evidence. Particularly listen to the young man on TikTok who speaks about the dam release causing a tsunami in Wairoa, not before the storm which they knew was coming, but during it. Pays to save all of this info before it gets wiped of the net by the censors. EWR
The following gut-wrenching report came to me in a voice message.
I believe strongly that the information should be made available to everyone while the identity of the person kept private.
I have therefore made a transcript and edited out bits that are at all personal
The reality on the ground in Hawkes Bay
Hey, how are you? Sorry, I haven’t really been in content. I’ve been trying to lay low.
From what I know there’s hundreds, hundreds dead the morgue – the morgue at the hospitals full.
There’s a morgue at the port that is reported to have about 100 bodies and I have spoken to someone I know that works at the port and he confirmed that.
But he also said it’s under army control and it’s classified.
So then I got a hold of a friend who’s in the army.
He’s actually been up in Gisborne. He’s due back here in Hawke’s Bay tonight, so I’m going to go and see him because he’s really cagey about what he says.
He said, ” I’ve been up in Gisborne and what I’ve seen there is worse than Afghanistan”.
So he’s been in the army 20 years, and he’s been to war and he said, this is worse.
My daughter’s boyfriend’s brother was working clearing a bridge yesterday. They were getting the slash up in he found a body. He recognized the hand, but the rest of the body is unrecognizable.
So I think that issue – and this is through talking with people I trust in Hawke’s Bay, not hearsay.
The issue was these bodies have been smashed by the slash. They have had downpours of water gushing past them. They’ve been beaten up and they’ve also been decomposing for six days in water and heat.
You can’t get a dental appointment in Hawke’s Bay because all the dentists are trying to use dental records to identify the bodies.
There is a group of 50 RSE workers (Recognised Seasonal Employer Limited Visa – ed) that were working in the Esk valley that have all been taken out.
The forestry boys on recovery mission – so the forestry boys, the navy, obviously the police, Search and Rescue – everyone are picking up bodies off the beaches and off the forestry blocks because I can get to more remote areas.
Apparently, the 50 RSE workers, no one can identify them.
24/2: so if what the eye witnesses have told us is true, then we’re getting a picture now about the folk not accounted for, a number that has been little mentioned in recent news announcements. The article at the previous link is a must watch. If you look back through Robert Deutsch’s videos since before cyclone gabrielle, you will see the areas flooded were the very ones he warned about. Our heartfelt condolences go out to all those who have lost loved ones.
22/2 Latest on the uncontactible was down to 1500 or so. If you are following Rob D. now you will note there is more rain coming.
19/2 Radio News reports today that 11 are dead with thousands missing.
17/2: The MSM tell us 6 people have died & more than 3K (tonight heard that’s now 4K+) are ‘uncontactable’ … not accounted for in other words. And NZ’s major food production district has been decimated.
16/2: As Robert predicted, a sizeable quake last night centered at Paraparaumu, magnitude 6 apparently. I was outdoors & could hear the house shaking and rattling. And sadly there have been at least 3 lives lost in this flooding event, some folk still not accounted for either. If you are watching these videos you will have noted more storms are coming. EWR
Tracking from a different perspective to MS ‘News’. Some of us have noticed MSM is not reporting truth these days. (Did they ever?) You won’t find this info there anyway given the widespread denial of this topic (in spite of the abundant evidence if you choose to look for it). Either way we need to be prepared and certainly pray that it veers right & avoids NZ altogether.
For info on weather warfare see our geoengineering pages & sub pages (main menu) and/or search for geoengineering, weather modification and weather warfare in ‘categories’ drop down box, left hand side of the page. Follow this NZ site for more in depth info.
Below are updates from Robert Deutsch (he is at FB as per above link) and at YT as Rob D. (Heads up, strong language warning. This comes I’m sure from reporting continually on ongoing crimes against humanity. Same with the SADs pretty much).
Let’s tell Chris Hipkins that we are not standing for the Therapeutic Products Bill. It is easier than you may think to make a submission and very easy to sign a petition. What would happen if we could get a million people to say:
No, we don’t want Natural Health Products regulated.
We urge Kiwis to join together, putting aside our differences, which in the whole scheme of things is tiny. We all want health and happiness for ourselves and future generations.
For more information on how the government wants to restrict your access to common foods, plants and supplements see:
There are two easy ways you can add your name to the increasing number of people who are saying no without leaving the couch!
1. Make a submission
This might sound scary, but we can tell you it is not. We’ll talk you through it.
Go to this webpage and start filling out your details. For those fired up you can request to make a submission in person but this is not compulsory.
Add your submission. This can be uploaded as a document or typed directly on the webpage.
Then simply click/press done!
Here are some hints about making a submission.
MPs are people too and they don’t like to read through screeds of evidence or hear your life story. They also won’t react well to you denigrating them either.
Keep it short Make it personal but not long-winded
State what you want. You do not need to justify yourself. MPs work for us.
Useful comments you can add.
We don’t want natural health products regulated Natural health products are much safer than many over-the-counter medications We trust our own bodies and know what they need Access to natural health supplements takes the pressure off the New Zealand health system by helping people to stay well At least 50% of New Zealanders use supplements As Maori, we have a right to easily access Rongoa, our traditional medicine
New Zealand boasts many people from diverse backgrounds. We all demand access to traditional medicine that has been used for centuries, whether it be Traditional Chinese Medicine or Traditional Western Herbal Medicine and everything in between.
Here is an example letter which you can use to help structure your opposition to the Therapeutics Bill. This example is long but gives you an idea of how to begin your objection.
2. Sign The Petition
When you sign this petition by lawyer and freedom fighter, Sue Grey, the government gets a message. Let’s get this to 1 million messages!
Lawyer Sue Grey’s message on the petitionThe proposal to regulate foods and herbs and traditional medicines is unlawful, irrational, unreasonable and unnecessary and is contrary to the interests of New Zealanders.
I am opposed to this bill because:
Foods, herbs and traditional medicines belong to the people, not the government.
It is contrary to the interests of New Zealanders to restrict affordable access to our foods, herbs and traditional medicines.
The Bill is too complex and impossible to understand.
The Bill is a poorly disguised attempt to privatise and block access to natural remedies with layers of costly red tape.
The Bill fails to recognise the considerable difference in risk between artificial and novel pharmaceutical drugs and natural products and that Pharmaceutical drugs are a significant cause of harm and death, whereas food and herbs are not.
New Zealanders need access to natural health practitioners. It is wrong to threaten them with civil and criminal penalties.
The NZ Government has NO mandate to reduce or remove our access to cheap, effective herbs, spices and nutritional supplements. This bill stinks of excessive influence of foreign corporations, and weak government that puts their profit ahead of our health.
Please take our foods, herbs and other safe, effective, traditional natural health products out of the Therapeutic Products Bill!
VIDEO AT THE LINK (Transcript below, note the transcript refers to some products that are not named but are pictured in the video)
What does the public want?
The public are aware that research findings on diet, nutrition, and lifestyle indicate that there are proven health benefits.
Over 50% of the public use natural health products and alternative approaches to health care.
The public realise there are many traditional sources of information about what products can be used safely.
If an individual suffers from a chronic or serious illness, or simply wants to maintain health, they need to retain their options to research and choose the most effective treatment for them.
The new bill will regulate all natural health products that claim to benefit health.
This is an enabling bill. As a result, the government will appoint a regulator who will then decide for you what products can be sold and what health claims can be made.
Well, what will the regulator decide?
In 2016, the Ministry of Health published a draft list of 5500 approved and all restricted ingredients. Most likely, the decisions of the new regulator, when appointed, will be based on this list.
Let’s answer the public’s first question.
Are all these ingredients safe?
The 2016 Ministry of Health permitted list included 3000 synthetic and chemical additives.
A closer look shows that the permitted list includes many additives which are suspected of causing illness and cancer. Including:
FD&C red No. 2
Amaranth, No. 3
Erythrosine No. 4
All are banned in the USA by the FDA.
A 2007 study in the UK found a possible link between six food dyes, a preservative and hyperactivity in children. All these compounds are likely to be permitted by the bill.
Thousands of artificial fragrances and flavours have been approved, even though they have not been tested properly.
Here’s an example of a pre-approved synthetic product. This cheap popular drink is available in New Zealand supermarkets. All of its ingredients have already been approved by the Ministry of Health.
Sugar: which predisposes to obesity and aggravates diabetes
E330 Synthetic citric acid
Synthetic raspberry flavour, effects unknown.
E211 sodium benzoate: implicated as a possible cause of hyperactivity when used with E122
Colour E122 Carmoisine: banned in the United States, Sweden, Norway and Austria
Artificial sweetener E961 Neotame: similar to aspartame and banned in organic products. US FDA application noted adverse reactions. Dr. Mercola recommends this be avoided at all costs.
This bill will allow this synthetic product to be marketed as a natural health product.
We’re talking about serious health issues here. During the last 20 to 30 years, there’s been a huge expansion in chronic diseases, including cancers, diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and other mental and physical illnesses.
No one knows the exact causes but poor nutrition food, food additives and environmental pollution are all suspected.
Over 2000 new chemicals are registered each year. There’s been a rapid expansion in the use of chemicals in food and synthetic chemicals. Many of these have been approved without sufficient scrutiny.
Using discredited principles such as substantial equivalence additives that are similar to but slightly different from natural compounds have been approved in though is well known that very small differences in chemical structure can cause serious side effects.
The bill requires the regulation of entirely natural ingredients already known to be safe, in other words, foods.
Under the bill, all ingredients have to be pre-approved. We estimate a supplier will pay $200 annually for each ingredient.
The probable minimal cost of making a health claim on the label will be $5,000 to the regulator for each application. And for each mild condition, your product claims to benefit.
But you will not be allowed to claim that a natural health product can benefit a serious health condition.
If it is considered that your product has therapeutic value, you will pay around $100,000 to register it as a medicine. And only a medical doctor will be allowed to prescribe it.
An EU report found that natural health products are 45,000 times safer than pharmaceutical drugs; Despite this, suppliers will have to comply with pharmaceutical style regulations and undertake frequent costly testing of ingredients and products.
Say you’re selling 300 product products to the public, and each one benefits two mild conditions; the application fees alone will be $3 million before you’ve even begun to prepare your evidence.
The experience in Australia has been that the preparation of a single application can cost in excess of $100,000.
These restrictions are so costly that most suppliers will simply refrain from making health claims, so you’ll have less information. Many will go out of business.
The net effect of these regulations will be that consumers will have less information than they did before.
Restrictions on scientific information regarding serious illness
Did you know that the simple kitchen spice turmeric is effective in preventing bowel cancer?
There are a lot of studies.
New Zealand has one of the highest death rates from bowel cancer in the developed world.
Studies show that garlic, ginger, turmeric, thyme, rosemary, sage, spearmint, and peppermint all inhibit the growth of colon cancer cells.
A study found that 1/3 of patients with end stage bowel cancer for whom no other treatment options existed, improved after treatment with turmeric extract.
If the bill is passed, I would not be allowed to tell you this and could be liable for a substantial fine.
So there are restrictions on free speech
It has been proven for years that garlic benefits healthy heart conditions. No one selling garlic will be allowed to communicate this factual scientific information. Thereby the bill will restrict free speech and suppress matters of fact.
There’ll be restrictions on health claims
A consignment of this product, Vicks vapour rub, was seized by Medsafe. Officials in May 2016 and destroyed because the Label made this unapproved health claim:
Apply to the chest, throat, and back for 3-way relief from blocked nose, cough, and body ache.
Thousands of products could be snagged by this rule.
Restrictions on dose
In 2016 the Ministry of Health believed that the maximum daily dose of vitamin B 12 should be 50 micrograms. This product, vitamin B 12, is commonly used by people who are deficient. It has hit each dose 20 times the maximum daily dose specified by the Ministry of Health. So it could be banned.
A typical Indian or Thai meal may contain 50 grams of tamarind. The maximum daily dose of tamarind that has been permitted by the bill is 500 milligrams, that is 100 times smaller than the amount you might consume in a meal.
Civil servants have been employed to make up this ridiculous rule and hundreds more like it.
Even though this traditional coffee substitute contains only natural plants, it will be banned by the bill because it contains an ingredient that is listed under the medicines act.
A sort of reverse patenting that bans herbs if they are used to make medicines.
Hundreds of traditional remedies will disappear.
Neem is one of the world’s most revered traditional healing plants with many medical uses. Among its many uses, it reduces inflammation associated with internal ulcers. It’s so effective that pharmaceutical companies have tried to patent this plant.
The regulator is likely to classify this herb as suitable for external use only. Effectively banning its traditional use for no reason.
This popular form of vitamin C could be banned because it contains a derivative of lecithin (commonly used in chocolate and other supermarket products), which in 2016, was classified by the Ministry of Health as for “external use only“.
Restrictions on traditional Indian and Chinese medicine
The bill will empower the regulator to restrict the traditional practices of ethnic communities, and it will violate the Bill of Rights.
More than 150 commonly used Indian herbs and a similar number of Chinese herbs were wrongly placed on a not permitted list by the Ministry of Health in 2016.
To a large extent, this is because many traditional herbs have been found to be so healthy, that they have been used to develop medicines and therefore these ingredients will be restricted in natural health products.
There are more than 10,000 traditional healing herbs. It will cost more than $100 million to register their healing properties, so in effect, their use will likely cease in New Zealand.
Just look at this list. This is just a short extract from 300 herbs that the Ministry of Health sought to restrict in 2016. The last time they tried to introduce a bill of this type.
These are foods that we consume many of us regularly, why should they be restricted it doesn’t make any sense.
What will it cost you
And these restrictions are going to cost a lot. Last week a 50 gram packet of Rubia Cordifolia, a herb used to make healthy tea cost $12.
After the bill is passed, the same packet may cost 60 to $80, just due to the compliance clock costs.
There are over 100,000 eligible plants. It will take an army of civil servants years to classify even a small proportion of them.
Assessment costs will be paid by the manufacturing industry so the cost of natural health products will obviously rise dramatically.
What will escape regulation
Well, many unhealthy products will be allowed to be sold without regulation.
Sugary Drinks, hard fat, synthetic flavours, and alcohol will continue to be sold unimpeded….
while the government pours millions of dollars and years of fruitless effort into controlling products that are already known to be safe and healthy foods.
This would be ridiculous if it wasn’t immoral and criminal.
There is absolutely no need for the government to regulate natural foods that are based on DNA that are used in natural health products.
Natural foods and herbs should be automatically excluded from regulation. There is no need to do this.
Meanwhile, there is a crisis in healthcare
Medical misadventure, experimentation and interventions have just become the number one cause of death in the world.
Healthcare costs are spiralling out of control.
Mental illness has quadrupled.
Cancers, chronic diseases, heart disease, and many other conditions are increasing to epidemic proportions, all cause mortality is rising.
Clearly something has gone horribly wrong. But no one knows quite why.
There is no doubt that food additives and the drugs we take play a pivotal role in the development of disease.
There have been multiple failures in the regulatory processes which approve agricultural practices food and medicine.
How has this happened?
The process of regulation has moved away from science and becomes a cosy relationship between industry and regulators permitting unsafe and inappropriate products onto the market.
The bill, the proposed, bill represents a new phase of this cosy relationship. Regulators worldwide are cooperating to place restrictions on natural health products. And this will only benefit multinational companies.
What can we do to reverse this trend?
There is a scientific standard scientific approach to identify cause
Eliminate suspected causal factors and reintroduce them one by one.
Dr. Dee Mangin at Otago Medical School, has found that if you stop all non-essential medication for the elderly, their health improves.
Dr. Julia Rutledge at Canterbury University has found that greatly improved nutrition benefits children with ADHD.
Dr. Kulreet Chaudhary, a renowned San Diego neurologist, has found that her patients, including MS sufferers, improved dramatically when placed on a traditional herbal diet.
These are just pointers to the many scientific preventive approaches to health care, which are springing up everywhere based on natural foods.
So why is our parliament planning to restrict natural health products?
We need to remind ourselves there is no evidence that natural health products are unsafe.
In fact, there’s a great deal of evidence that they benefit health and prevent illness.
Natural health products are traditionally made from plants and animal products which are based on DNA and natural minerals.
Our digestive system has developed to easily metabolise food based on DNA without side effects.
Many people rely on natural health products to maintain their health. It will be criminally negligent to restrict their options.
True natural health products are in fact foods.
There is nothing risky about their use.
Taking natural health products is no different from the need to have a balanced meal.
Food is life. It is our first medicine.
The healing properties of plants are proven to benefit public health. Our right to use them should not be taken away by law and transferred to pharmaceutical interests.
We are a people here who believe in fairness.
This is not the time for New Zealand to become involved in an international effort to subvert regulatory safeguards.
This is not the time to restrict access to preventive health care.
This is not the time to allow suspected unhealthy synthetic ingredients to be included in natural health products.
This is not the time to restrict access to herbs and impose huge unjustified costs on traditional medicine.
This is a time for New Zealand to lead the world in the development of application of preventive approaches to health care.
The therapeutic products bill is currently up for public submissions up until February 15, 2023. Make a submission here.
Ask your MP to review this presentation, which shows that the bill relies upon outdated and discredited ideas.
Or you can contact me directly at my email firstname.lastname@example.org or go to my website for more information. Thank you
Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
Two of the most harmful ingredients in processed foods are high fructose corn syrup and soybean oil, whether partially hydrogenated, organic, or made from newer soybean varieties modified in such a way as to not require hydrogenation
Completely unnatural man-made fats created through the partial hydrogenation process cause dysfunction and chaos in your body on a cellular level, and studies have linked trans-fats to health problems ranging from obesity and diabetes to reproductive problems and heart disease
Besides the health hazards related to the trans fats created by the partial hydrogenation process, soybean oil is, in and of itself, NOT a healthy oil
Add to that the fact that the majority of soybeans grown in the U.S. are genetically engineered, and as a result saturated with dangerous levels of the herbicide glyphosate, which may have additional health consequences as there are no long term safety studies
When taken together, partially hydrogenated GE soybean oil becomes one of the absolute worst types of oils you can consume
The genetically engineered (GE) variety planted on over 90% of U.S. soy acres is Roundup Ready engineered to survive being doused with otherwise lethal amounts of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide (glyphosate). GE soybeans have been found to contain residue levels as high as 17 mg/kg, and malformations in frog and chicken embryos have occurred at just over 2 mg/kg
Processed food is perhaps the most damaging aspect of most people’s diets, contributing to poor health and chronic disease. One of the primary culprits is high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), the dangers of which I touch on in virtually every article I write on diets. The second culprit is partially hydrogenated soybean oil.
These two ingredients, either alone or in combination, can be found in virtually all processed foods, and one can make a compelling argument that the reliance on these two foods is a primary contributing factor for most of the degenerative diseases attacking Americans today.
Part of the problem with partially hydrogenated soybean oil is the trans fat it contains. The other part relates to the health hazards of soy itself. An added hazard factor is the fact that the majority of both corn and soybeans are genetically engineered.
As the negative health effects from trans fats have been identified and recognized, the agricultural and food industry have scrambled to come up with new alternatives. Partially hydrogenated soybean oil has been identified as the main culprit, and for good reason.
Unfortunately, saturated fats are still mistakenly considered unhealthy by many health “experts,” so, rather than embracing truly healthful tropical fats like coconut oil, which is mostly grown outside the U.S., the food industry has instead turned to domestic U.S. alternatives offered by companies like Monsanto, now Bayer (which bought out Monsanto in 2018), which has developed modified soybeans that don’t require hydrogenation.
Americans consume more than 16 million metric tons of edible oils annually, and soybean oil accounts for about 11,339 metric tons of it.1 Until Monsanto genetically engineered its seeds to produce plants lower in linolenic acid, about half of it was hydrogenated, as regular soybean oil is too unstable otherwise to be used in food manufacturing.
One of the primary reasons for hydrogenating oil is to prolong its shelf life. Raw butter, for example, is likely to go rancid far quicker than margarine. The process also makes the oil more stable and raises its melting point, which allows it to be used in various types of food processing that uses high temperatures.
Hydrogenated oil2 is made by forcing hydrogen gas into the oil at high pressure. Virtually any oil can be hydrogenated. Margarine is a good example, in which nearly half of the fat content is trans fat.
The process that creates partially hydrogenated oil alters the chemical composition of essential fatty acids, such as reducing or removing linolenic acid, a highly reactive triunsaturated fatty acid, transforming it into the far less reactive linoleic acid, thereby greatly preventing oxidative rancidity when used in cooking.
In the late 1990s, researchers began realizing this chemical alteration might actually have adverse health effects. Since then, scientists have verified this to the point of no dispute.
Be aware that there’s a difference between “fully hydrogenated” and “partially hydrogenated” oils. Whereas partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat, fully hydrogenated oil does not, as taking the hydrogenation process “all the way” continues the molecular transformation of the fatty acids from trans fat into saturated fatty acids.
Fully hydrogenated soybean oil is still not a healthy choice, however, for reasons I’ll explain below. The following slide presentation explains the technical aspects relating to the hydrogenation process.
The Health Hazards of Trans Fats
The completely unnatural man-made fats created through the partial hydrogenation process cause dysfunction and chaos in your body on a cellular level, and studies have linked trans-fats to:
Cancer, by interfering with enzymes your body uses to fight cancer
Chronic health problems such as obesity, asthma, auto-immune disease, cancer and bone degeneration
Diabetes, by interfering with the insulin receptors in your cell membranes
Heart disease, by clogging your arteries (Among women with underlying coronary heart disease, eating trans-fats increased the risk of sudden cardiac arrest three-fold!)
Decreased immune function, by reducing your immune response
Increased blood levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad” cholesterol, while lowering levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL), or “good” cholesterol
Reproductive problems by interfering with enzymes needed to produce sex hormones
Interfering with your body’s use of beneficial omega-3 fats
As usual, it took many years before conventional health recommendations caught up and began warning about the use of trans fats. Not surprisingly, as soon as the FDA notified them that it planned to require food manufacturers to list trans fat content on the label — which ultimately took effect January 1, 2006 — the industry began searching for viable alternatives to appeal to consumers who increasingly began looking for the “no trans fat” designation.
It didn’t take long before Monsanto had tinkered forth a genetically engineered soybean that is low in linolenic acid, which we’ll get to in a moment.
Be aware that some food manufacturers have opted to simply fool buyers — a tactic allowed by the FDA, as any product containing up to half a gram of trans fat per serving can still legally claim to have zero trans fat.3 The trick is to reduce the serving size to bring it below this threshold. At times, this will result in unreasonably tiny serving sizes, so any time you check a label and a serving is something like 10 chips or one cookie, it probably contains trans fats.
The Health Hazards of Soybeans
Besides the health hazards related to the trans fats created by the partial hydrogenation process, soybean oil is, in and of itself, NOT a healthy oil. Add to that the fact that the majority of soy grown in the U.S. is genetically engineered, which may have additional health consequences. When taken together, partially hydrogenated GE soybean oil becomes one of the absolute worst types of oils you can consume.
Years ago, tropical oils, such as palm and coconut oil, were commonly used in American food production. However, these are obviously not grown in the U.S., as with the exception of Hawaii, our climate isn’t tropical enough. Spurred by financial incentives, the industry devised a plan to shift the market from tropical oils to something more “home grown.”
As a result, a movement was created to demonize and vilify tropical oils in order to replace them with domestically grown oils such as corn and soy.
The fat in soybean oil is primarily omega-6 fat. And while we do need some omega-6, it is rare for anyone to be deficient in it, as it is pervasive in our diet. Americans in general consume FAR too much omega-6 in relation to omega-3 fat, primarily due to the excessive amount of omega-6 found in processed foods.
Omega-6 fats are in nearly every animal food and many plants, so deficiencies are very rare. This omega-6 fat is also highly processed and therefore damaged, which compounds the problem of getting so much of it in your diet. The omega-6 found in soybean oil promotes chronic inflammation in your body, which is an underlying issue for virtually all chronic diseases.
What About Organic Soybean Oil?
Even if you were fortunate enough to find organic soybean oil, there are still several significant concerns that make it far from attractive from a health standpoint. Soy in and of itself, organically grown or not, contains a number of problematic components that can wreak havoc with your health, such as:
• Goitrogens — Goitrogens, found in all unfermented soy whether it’s organic or not, are substances that block the synthesis of thyroid hormones and interfere with iodine metabolism, thereby interfering with your thyroid function.
• Isoflavones: genistein and daidzein — Isoflavones are a type of phytoestrogen, which is a plant compound resembling human estrogen, which is why some recommend using soy therapeutically to treat symptoms of menopause. I believe the evidence is highly controversial and doubt it works.
Typically, most of us are exposed to too many estrogen compounds and have a lower testosterone level than ideal, so it really is important to limit exposure to feminizing phytoestrogens. Even more importantly, there’s evidence it may disturb endocrine function, cause infertility and promote breast cancer, which is definitely a significant concern.
• Phytic acid — Phytates (phytic acid) bind to metal ions, preventing the absorption of certain minerals, including calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc — all of which are co-factors for optimal biochemistry in your body. This is particularly problematic for vegetarians, because eating meat reduces the mineral-blocking effects of these phytates.
Sometimes it can be beneficial, especially in postmenopausal women and in most adult men because we tend to have levels of iron that are too high, which can be a very potent oxidant and cause biological stress. However, phytic acid does not necessarily selectively inhibit just iron absorption; it inhibits all minerals. This is very important to remember, as many already suffer from mineral deficiencies from inadequate diets.
The soybean has one of the highest phytate levels of any grain or legume, and the phytates in soy are highly resistant to normal phytate-reducing techniques such as long, slow cooking. Only a long period of fermentation will significantly reduce the phytate content of soybeans.
• Natural toxins known as “anti-nutrients” — Soy also contains other anti-nutritional factors such as saponins, soyatoxin, protease inhibitors, and oxalates. Some of these factors interfere with the enzymes you need to digest protein. While a small amount of anti-nutrients would not likely cause a problem, the amount of soy that many Americans are now eating is extremely high.
• Hemagglutinin — Hemagglutinin is a clot-promoting substance that causes your red blood cells to clump together. These clumped cells are unable to properly absorb and distribute oxygen to your tissues.
Worst of All — Genetically Engineered Soybean Oil
The genetically engineered (GE) variety planted on over 90% of US soy acres is Roundup Ready — engineered to survive being doused with otherwise lethal amounts of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide. The logic behind Roundup Ready crops such as soy is that you can decrease the cost of production by killing off everything except the actual soy plant.
However, animal studies reveal there may be significant adverse health effects from these GE soybeans, including progressively increased rates of infertility with each passing generation. By the third generation, virtually all the hamsters in one feeding study were found to be infertile. Second-generation hamsters raised on GE soy also had a fivefold higher infant mortality rate.
Are Low-Linolenic Soybeans the Answer?
We now also have other Monsanto-made soy crops to contend with. Responding to the growing demand for healthier diets, Monsanto launched Vistive low-linolenic soybeans in 2005. Most soybeans contain roughly 7% linolenic acid. The new varieties contain 1% to 3%, which reduces the need for hydrogenation.4 As explained by Monsanto:5
“Farmers are not the only beneficiaries of Monsanto’s efforts … Consumers will also benefit from the healthier crops that could result, such as soybeans that are low in linolenic acid. Linolenic acid, a precursor to trans fats, may contribute to cardiovascular disease … Low-linolenic soybeans reduce the need for hydrogenation in food processing, helping to reduce the amount of trans fats in processed foods.”
Yet another soybean variety created by Monsanto is the high stearate soybean, which also has the properties of margarine and shortening without hydrogenation. But are these soybeans any better or safer than either conventional soybeans or Roundup Ready soybeans, even though they don’t have to go through partial hydrogenation, and therefore do not contain trans fat? No one knows.
Another Hazard of GE Soybeans: Glyphosate
I keep stacking health risks upon health risks, and here’s another one: Research has shown that soybean oil from Roundup Ready soy is loaded with glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup — the broad-spectrum herbicide created by Monsanto.
According to a report in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology, the highest MRL for glyphosate in food and feed products in the EU is 20 mg/kg. GE soybeans have been found to contain residue levels as high as 17 mg/kg, and malformations in frog and chicken embryos occurred at 2.03 mg/kg.6 That’s 10 times lower than the MRL.
This is an alarming finding because glyphosate is easily one of the world’s most overlooked poisons. Research published in 2010 showed that the chemical, which works by inhibiting an enzyme called EPSP synthase that is necessary for plants to grow, causes birth defects in frogs and chicken embryos at far lower levels than used in agricultural and garden applications.7 The malformations primarily affected the:
Midline and developing brain
When applied to crops, glyphosate becomes systemic throughout the plant, so it cannot be washed off. And, once you eat this crop, the glyphosate ends up in your gut where it can decimate your beneficial bacteria. This can wreak havoc with your health, as 80% of your immune system resides in your gut (GALT, or Gut Associated Lymph Tissue) and is dependent on a healthy ratio of good and bad bacteria. Separate research has also uncovered the following effects from glyphosate:
To Avoid Harmful Fats, Ditch Processed Foods
If you want to avoid dangerous fats of all kinds, your best bet is to eliminate processed foods from your diet. From there, use these tips to make sure you’re eating the right fats for your health:
Use organic butter (preferably made from raw milk) instead of margarines and vegetable oil spreads. Butter is a healthy whole food that has received an unwarranted bad rap.
Use coconut oil for cooking. It is far superior to any other cooking oil and is loaded with health benefits.
Be sure to eat raw fats, such as those from avocados, raw dairy products, olive oil, olives, organic pastured eggs and raw nuts, especially macadamia nuts which are relatively low in protein. Also take a high-quality source of animal-based omega-3 fat, such as krill oil.
Following my comprehensive nutrition plan will automatically reduce your trans-fat intake, as it will give you a guide to focus on healthy whole foods instead of processed junk food.
Remember, virtually all processed foods will contain either HFCS (probably made from genetically engineered corn) and/or soybean oil — either in the form of partially hydrogenated soybean oil, which is likely made from GE soybeans, loaded with glyphosate, or from one of the newer soybean varieties that were created such that the y do not need to be hydrogenated. They’re ALL bad news, if you value your health.
The censors have been busily deleting, blocking or shadow banning online articles in the ‘awful’ event you may be led astray by the ‘antis’. In NZ’s case, they cannot have you thinking for yourself when your nation has only one source of truth … woe betide anybody whose toe crosses that line.
I happened across this list the other day actually quite by chance. On it are all three of my WP sites, this one that you are reading, plus here and here. They are classified as anti-V (you know that word) when in fact two of them have nothing whatsoever to do with Vs. Cast your eye down the very very long list and you will see the scope of forbidden topics in fact spreads far wider that the V. Another thing I’ve noticed are little bright red exclamation marks next to my site links … not safe to visit! The author does invite you to get in touch & make a case for not being on the ‘list’ … but as with most things nowadays, the onus of ‘proof’ is placed on the ‘recipient’ and not on the accuser, where it should be.
Recently when listening to Dr Mercola (another heavily censored MD) I heard him describing a very old article of his from two decades ago that he discovered is totally scrubbed from the internet. He could not find it anywhere. (No point in posting his links as he now takes his posts down after 48 hours & places them in a paid archive). Max Igan also who has his finger on the button, notes how article after article is being removed. I certainly have found that searching for material now in any search engine is pretty futile really. It’s clearly all geared to mainstream propaganda only. I would suggest when saving links that folk copy the entire article for safekeeping. Many articles I’ve only posted links for (out of courtesy in that the reader can go to the original source) are now dead. Videos follow the same pattern as YT is now reserved for material only JA would approve of.
And the libraries, well they’ve been culling those for a good while now too. (See here also). With the histories gone we’ll be all set for the coming reset.
The Enzed Govt doesn’t appear to just tinker with shadow banning and the like… back in early 2019 they hired a security firm with your tax dollars to spy on folk (EWR included) who didn’t want 1080 poison contaminating their water supplies. People who decline the consumption of this ‘harmless’ green ‘candy’ are classed as that other forbidden word that starts with ‘t’. If you’re a fan of the ‘candy’ by the way, read here.
On that concluding note, you persons that give birth … well those birth pains, like free speech, are set to be a thing of the past!
Note: it’s what corporations do …. with impunity. Watch The Corporation movie. EWR
Why is Big Pharma investigating their own covid vaccines for myocarditis side effects if the vaccines were already supposedly tested and proven safe and effective?
Both Pfizer and Moderna have announced that they will be undertaking studies to determine the longer term risks of Myocarditis (an inflammatory condition of the heart which can lead to death) for people who have been injected with the mRNA based covid vaccines. The decision comes after the release of multiple medical studies which show a correlation and causation between the vaccines and an exponential increase in heart problems, specifically among men 40 years old and younger. Only a year ago the link between covid vaccinations and myocarditis was widely denied.
Studies also show that myocarditis risk increases with the number of boosters a person has taken.
The average level of dicamba herbicide in the urine of pregnant women has increased more than 3-fold since 2017, the year widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant GMO crops began, Heartland Health Research Alliance (HHRA) reported on Tuesday.
Dicamba levels in urine have risen dramatically compared to levels of 2,4-D. In 2010-2014, the average level of 2,4-D in urine (0.4 ug/L) was twice the average level of dicamba (0.2 ug/L). But by 2020-2022, the average level of dicamba (0.68 ug/L) exceeded the 2,4-D average (0.575 ug/L) by 18%, despite a 45% increase in the average level of 2,4-D in urine in 2020-2022 since 2010-2014.
Both herbicides are classified as “possible” carcinogens and are known to increase the risk of reproductive problems and adverse birth outcomes.
The percent of urine samples with detectable levels of dicamba rose 50% from 2010-2014 to 2020-2022 as a result of the widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant crops.
Of the 16 pesticide analytes that HHRA testing is able to detect, 5 were in found in 99%-100% of the samples, including 2,4-D. Since 2010, most people in the Midwest have been exposed to 7 or more of these 16 pesticide analytes on a near-daily basis.
The above new evidence of rising herbicide exposures was presented on Tuesday at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association in Boston. The “Assessing Herbicide Impacts on Reproduction, Birth Outcomes & Children’s Development” session highlighted evidence pointing to rising risk of herbicide-driven adverse birth outcomes.
HHRA’s new biomonitoring data point to four preliminary findings.
The average level of dicamba in the urine of pregnant women has increased 3.4-fold just since widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant seeds began in 2017.
Recent increases in farmer reliance on glufosinate (Liberty-brand herbicide) is now leading to possibly significant exposures to glufosinate and its primary metabolite 3-MPPA (3-MethylPhosphonicoPropionic Acid).
Some good news — the levels of 8 out of 10 synthetic pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticide analytes have fallen over the last decade or so, including about a 50% decline in the primary metabolite of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos.
Based on HHRA’s data spanning 17 pesticide analytes, the average person in the Midwest over the last two decades has been exposed on most days to at least 7 pesticide analytes.
HHRA is highlighting the new data on dicamba and glufosinate because, these are the first, significant datasets collected worldwide on levels of these herbicides in human urine. Such data are essential for regulators, farmers, and the pesticide industry to accurately quantify pesticide risks and when determining whether steps are warranted to reduce exposures.
via The Activation Podcast: On this episode of The Activation podcast Derrick Broze interviews returning guest James Corbett regarding his work on climate change. James has been researching the claims about climate change since 2007 and has produced dozens of reports and podcast dissecting the various claims about anthropogenic climate change. Derrick and James discuss what the climate change propagandists have right and what they have dangerously wrong. They also discuss the agenda behind the climate change movement. You are not going to want to miss this informative and empowering episode!
EWR Comment: our info on this topic can be found here. It includes a petition signed by thousands of scientists and a speech by Australia’s Sen Malcolm Roberts who nails it completely. He has also spoken out similarly about the new ‘safe & effective’ medical treatment.
WithQueen Elizabeth II having passed on now, her legacy will continue of course, in her offspring. This is a Queen who has expressed throughout her lifetime, an allegiance to Jesus Christ. It is difficult however, to reconcile her words with her actions.
To begin, let’s start with the obvious and her response (or lack of) to her sons’ association with known pedophiles.
Andrew’s with Jeffrey Epstein and Charles’ with Jimmy Savile. These and similar variations of the same within her royal brood have known no bounds in recent years. Take the ‘carry ons’ for instance of the Prince widely considered to be her favourite son.
The Royal stance about that was made quite clear when Prince Andrew’s suitability for public office was questioned by Labour’s Justice spokesman in the House of Commons, following the publicity around Andrew’s unsuitable close associations. He was sharply warned by the Speaker that his references to royalty should be ‘very rare, very sparing and very respectful’. There you have it in a nutshell …no requirement to take responsibility. And no expectation that the public should speak up about the King’s new clothes (or lack of).
The royal response to the House of Commons misspeak? :
The Duke of York is thus driven to Windsor for his proud mother the Queen to invest him. The Queen makes him a Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, the highest order in the monarch’s gift to bestow. She personally decides to accord him the insignia’s highest rank, KG, GCVO, CD, after which the two royals, mother and son, take tea.
There’s much more as we know… and we’ve not even touched on the saga that was Diana, or Charles’ carry on with Camilla whilst married to the former. The Queen’s response to Andrew’s behaviour is telling enough.
Investigative Journalist John Pilger writes that it was the British who invented the modern arms trade in 1860, a trade that is now run for and by governments. The innocent victims of these wars are of course citizens, in particular the children. During the war on Iraq he says, an estimated 50 children died each day as a result of the deliberate bombing of Iraq’s water, power and sewage systems. (Distant Voices, Pilger, p156). :
“‘The British are really rather good at making certain kinds of weapons,’ said Prince Charles at the Dubai arms fair, where he was promoting the British arms industry, as his family frequently does. He happened to be standing near an ‘anti-personnel’ weapon designed specifically to destroy, not objects, but as many people as possible. ‘It’s the hoary old chestnut,’ he said. ‘If we don’t sell them, someone else will'” (Hidden Agendas, Pilger, p 119).
How Queen Elizabeth II profits from the arms trade
To the Queen’s advisers she must seem the ultimate insider trader as, thanks to her royal boxes, she’s ahead of the game. Having advanced knowledge of any country’s ups and downs is useful, as in racing, to those buying and selling.
On the Queen’s accession it was said that she was worth 300 million pounds. Now the royal nest egg’s said to be 17 billion. Her investments in BP & in Rio Tinto Zinc mean very simply, she profits from petrol and uranium, and her subjects get ill.
After the Queen had been the first to switch on nuclear power at Calder Hall in Cumbria in the 1950s the world’s first nuclear power station was followed by Sizewell B and the Queen was advised to invest in uranium. Not withstanding any greenwash, royal gamblers have few ethics, and despite a feigned concern, Royalty knows that arms are good investments, and since those with money like making more, they risk the earth’s transformation into a death star, through shells, and bombs and cruise missiles, all tipped with depleted uranium (DU), so they pierce more easily through the heavy armour and the fortifications of perceived enemies. Air, water and soil are contaminated when DU is used.
Dr Doug Rokke, the ex director of the Pentagon’s DU Project says there is no way to decontaminate an area hit with Uranium.
“We also know it happens forever, therefore when the army personally says that food and water will be contaminated and that it’s an indiscriminate killer, that makes the use of DU a crime against God and a crime against humanity”.
Dr Jay M. Gould: “A large part of the baby boomer generation have had their immune systems compromised at worst.”
Dr Jay Gould would reveal in his book The Enemy Within: The High Cost of Living Near Nuclear Reactors, the extent of royalty’s uranium investments, and their uranium wealth was hot-housed by an entrepreneur Tiny Rowland. Thanks to Tiny Rowland’s companies Lonrho and Rio Tinto. Tiny Rowland asset stripped half of Africa, and though this takeover bid for Harrods was called the unpleasant and unacceptable face of capitalism he was popular with the Royals and the mega rich.
“Tiny Rowland says he loves Africa because Africa has enriched him …he definitely loves it because it has enriched him.” Dr Mathias Mpande, Deputy Minister of Mines, Zambia.
Interviewer to Rowland: “Anything that has been brought to light as a result of the Lonrho affair, do you find any of that in any way the unacceptable face of capitalism?”
“I can’t judge because this has not escalated into a political matter and I know so little about politics here that I just, I can’t comment.” Tiny Rowland.
Never mind that Rowland was formerly Rowland Fuhrhop, an unashamed member of Hitler Youth. Princess Alexander’s husband, the Queen’s nephew, Angus Ogilvy, would sit on Rowland’s board with Royal approval.
The Royal shares would thus finance the army of Africa in Lonrho’s resource wars.
African leaders promised Lonrho that their strategic minerals were armed to the hilt by Ogilvy and Rowland. Tiny Rowland was nicknamed the Royals’ Buccaneer and how much he made them is unknown, but the condition of his African workforces were notorious, and so Africa fueled new spurts of Royal wealth.
The Anti-Slavery Society reported in 1987 that in Lonrho’s shanty goldmines 60 boys had to work almost naked in a pool of cyanide at Lonrho’s extractor plant in Ghana. The cyanide used in separating out the gold enters the body as gas, liquid or acid dust. The boys worked naked, since on Rowland’s orders this was company policy to reduce theft.
In 1973 Lonrho was the biggest plantation owner in Africa, controlling 98% of oil imports through its pipelines. It mined for example, 40% of Zimbabwe’s gold, and it was the largest agricultural producer, thus, thanks to their pet buccaneer, the Royal shareholders were re-colonizing Africa by the back door. And thus, thanks to Tiny Rowland’s advice their uranium holdings are now worth more than 6 billion dollars.
But just as England was wont to conquer others, as Shakespeare wrote, she has made a shameful conquest of herself. A uranium wind can now blow back into the faces of these profiteers with their poisons being impossible to decontaminate. Thanks to uranium investors, radioactive isotopes are now found in the flesh of worms. At a Ministry of Defense weapons range in Dumphries, DU has turned the worms mutant. Worms are a pillar of ecosystems through aerating the soil and aiding the nutrient uptake of plants whom Charles reputedly likes to talk to, though he may now need a geiger counter before addressing his radioactive trifids in Scotland. However, there’ll be no apology from the Palace for any carcinogenic carnage, since DU, hardening the tips of shells to pierce concrete is one of the Royal Ordinance’s star exports.
Despite the Royal Ordinance’s weapons that contain DU, such as those made at Fazakerley, Liverpool counting as poison gas weapons, violating the Geneva Convention under the 1925 Geneva Poison Gas Protocol. The DU shell, which the sovereign has shares in is a highly mobile indiscriminate killer. It’s described as a permanent terrain contaminant, which has a half life of 4.5 billion years. Unlike any hereditary monarchy however historic, DU stains the environment for ever and ever. Its half life has earned it the title of a silent killer. The silent killer that will never stop killing. And there’s nothing depleted about DU when you see the birth defects it causes … swollen heads, enlarged eyeballs, dysfunctional limbs, as DU rewrites DNA codes making them into nonsense.
“What this has generated is from 2004 up to this day we are seeing a rate of congenital malformations in the city of Fallujah that has surpassed even that in the aftermath of, in the wake of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that nuclear bombs were dropped on at the end of World War II” Al Jazeera News.
While the British government was waging its illegal war in Iraq it increased the value of the Royal investment, for the price of uranium would rise 500% in six years.
This Royal preponderance with arms investments is surely concerning? It appears to have taken precedence back in the 1970s also when Great Britain under a pretext of lies, evicted two thousand or so Chagossians from their homeland of Diego Garcia, a British colony in the Indian Ocean, in order to grant the US their wish to obtain that people’s island (uninhabited) for a military base. They would use it later as a platform for bombing Iraq and Afghanistan.
Diego Garcia and the Chagossian People
The British had struck a deal with the US during the 1960s for the acquisition of the island. Deviously tricked into compliance and lied to by the official British representative living on the island, the Chagossian people were first terrorized and intimidated via the gassing of their pet dogs, then dumped on a cargo ship and transported wholesale to a nearby island, and left in an abandoned housing complex with no water or means of survival. Many died of sadness and suicide. Years later, when these displaced and original inhabitants of Diego Garcia won in the British High Court the right to return to their homeland … Queen Elizabeth exercised her Royal prerogative and declined them that right. (See here also). As Pilger points out in his doco, ‘dictators do this … but without the quaint ritual’, (as in how this prerogative plays out in a ritual at the Palace). This episode in British history is little known to mainstream readers. I first saw it in 2004, with the initial release of John Pilger’s documentary ‘Stealing a Nation’ a day or two before Christmas when everybody is too busy to pay attention, (peak viewing time if you want information to fly under the radar).
You can watch the doco at the link and learn of the sordid details for yourself. (Visit this website to support the Chagossian people.)
And so, as Great Britain moves on with their new (unelected) king in place, remember Charles is totally in sync with imposing the so called ‘Great Reset’ upon a world that never even asked for it. So much for professions of democracy.
The term “manufacturing consent” was initially coined by Edward S Herman and Noam Chomsky.
“Manufacturing consent” describes a propaganda model used by the corporate media to sway public opinion and “inculcate individuals with values and beliefs…”:
The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace. It is their function to amuse, entertain, and inform, and to inculcate individuals with the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior that will integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society. In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this role requires systematic propaganda. (Manufacturing Consent by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky)
“Manufacturing consent” implies manipulating and shaping public opinion. It establishes conformity and acceptance to authority and social hierarchy. It seeks compliance to an established social order. “Manufacturing consent” describes the submission of public opinion to the mainstream media narrative, to its lies and fabrications.
In this article, we focus on a related concept, namely the subtle process of “manufacturing dissent” (rather than “consent”), which plays a decisive role in serving the interests of the ruling class.
Under contemporary capitalism, the illusion of democracy must prevail. It is in the interest of the corporate elites to accept dissent and protest as a feature of the system inasmuch as they do not threaten the established social order. The purpose is not to repress dissent, but, on the contrary, to shape and mould the protest movement, to set the outer limits of dissent.
To maintain their legitimacy, the economic elites favor limited and controlled forms of opposition, with a view to preventing the development of radical forms of protest, which might shake the very foundations and institutions of global capitalism. In other words, “manufacturing dissent” acts as a “safety valve”, which protects and sustains the New World Order.
To be effective, however, the process of “manufacturing dissent” must be carefully regulated and monitored by those who are the object of the protest movement.
On topic, years ago I purchased and read the late Joan Veon’s book called ‘Charles, the Sustainable Prince’ (discussed in this post). Written in 1997, she raises some interesting observations. Well worth the read. She discusses her belief that when the U.S. Senate signed the U.N. Charter in 1945, that is when American officially entered world government and reverted back under British rule. This book documents the role of the British royal family as a formidable power working BEHIND the scenes of the UN and the role of Prince Charles with that of sustainable development and public-private partnerships. The partnerships are, she says, an arm of the world’s growing corporatocracy and their bottom line is to take control of the assets of Government. We’ve seen enough of that in recent years. But then the role of the globalists is to do away with national sovereignty. And private property. (For a wider picture see Barry Smith’s three End Times videos on this page).
“We are at present working discreetly, with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands.” Arnold Toynbee – International Affairs, p.809, November 1931
Amazon’s summary of Veon’s book reads thus: “As a result of covering two dozen United Nations and U.N.-related conferences in the last four years, Joan Veon has come to believe that the connection between the British royal family and the United Nations is not coincidental but provides the way for America to be rejoined with Britain. She states that when the Senate ratified the United Nations Charter, America reverted back under British rule thus fulfilling the goals of Cecil Rhodes, the diamond and gold magnate, who left his fortune to achieve this very goal. What this means is that Prince Charles, as heir to the British throne, has a bigger role to play in world affairs than what people could imagine. She knows that he is a “Renaissance man” and a man with a mission. As a result of his behind-the-scenes role at the United Nations, Prince Charles is responsible for changing the order of life from the biblical perspective of man having dominance over the earth to one in which the earth has dominance over man. One of the major environmental philosophies which runs tantamount to this is that of “sustainable development.” Because of his global orchestrations, she has dubbed Charles “the sustainable prince.” This is a must read for all those who seek to understand the day and the hour and the powers that rule over us.”
Charles holds many titles, one of which is Principal Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, the Order into which Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush were knighted after leaving office.
Charles features at the WEF touting the “Great Reset … a new initiative for a sustainable post-pandemic world, from the World Economic Forum and the Prince of Wales.”
Sky News Australia brought this to our attention back in late 2020. Below is a transcript of their major points, cited here because they include Charles’ statements about the great reset … ie where they are heading:
“Sky News Australia: I have repeatedly warned about the great reset… to take the tools of oppression used to tackle the coronavirus and use them all, lockdowns, forced business closures, exclusion zones, isolation … all of those measures, including destroying private property rights and private income in order to tackle … the climate crisis.
Schwab’s speech: “Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight severe virus but to shape the system.”
Prince Charles’ speech: “We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have again. So we must use all the levers we have at our disposal knowing that each and every one of us has a vital role to play.”
Antonio Guterres speech (former Sec Gen of UN, member of Portuguese Socialist Party): “The great reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake up call. It is imperative that we re-imagine, rebuild, redesign, reinvigorate and rebalance our world. Rebalancing investment, harnessing science and technology and advancing the transition to net zero emissions all elements of the great reset are fundamental to building the future we need.”
Sky News Australia: This great reset is as serious and as dangerous a threat to our prosperity, to your prosperity, and your freedom as we have faced in decades. With these powerful bodies, including the WEF, the UN, the IMF, and even Prince Charles boasting, yes boasting that within a few short years … ‘You will own nothing, and you will be happy”. They are even running ads for the great reset. Whatever you want you will rent and it will be delivered by drone. The US won’t be the world’s leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate.
A terrifying coalition of big business, big tech and left wing totalitarians are so confident and so brazen … they are now promising you will own nothing and you will be happy. What they should have added is ‘and we the very rich will own everything and be even happier.’
The great tragedy here is that Prince Charles is involved in this fascist, corporatist global push and is thereby putting our entire constitutional monarchy at risk.”
What stayed in my memory from our coverage was the visit the residents got just weeks before the fire, instructing them to remain in their apartments if a fire should ever break out. Recordings of phone calls revealed this is what they did. One was left with the feeling that it was a complete cover up … may justice be done for those victims, many more it would appear, than the ‘official’ account gave us. EWR
Watch at the link below as Mark Steele gives his opinion on this event as being linked to smart meters:
This is an outstanding introduction to the methods used by the bankers to gain control of the United States. Similar methods have been employed in all other countries of the world.
This step-by-step narration shows you the gradual changes invoked by silent wars that remain unreported by mainstream media. Why? Because mainstream media is also owned by the same bankers, and this is why alternative media is so very important today.
Please share this video with everyone you know.
Written and spoken by Michael Rivero. Written version here.
New Zealand has for many decades waged a war against predators. Currently there are a number of anti-predator campaigns, often using public money in big spend-ups on futile aerial poisoning exercises. In addition, in the end, the blanket operations run counter to the impassioned aim of exterminating predators (e.g. rats) and instead cause major disruption to food chains and serious damage to the ecosystem. For example there is Predator Free 2050, and Zero Invasive Predators, the latter jazzily known by the acronym of ZIP. The zealous programmes have earned international recognition.“Time” magazine which proclaimed “Rats, Possums and Stoats Beware! New Zealand Goes to War Against Invasive Pests.” But the programmes are like the 1837 Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes”. At one stage in the fable, the wise man serving the Emperor thinks “What!” “Is it possible that I am a fool? I have never thought so myself. No one must know it now if I am so. Can it be, that I am unfit for my job?”Those questions should be asked of those who champion Predator Free 2050 and ZIP – people from Prime Ministers to central and local government politicians, local bodies, naive unquestioning media whoop as investigative journalists, extreme green groups and even unprincipled “scientists” following the money trail of funding all pursuing the dream of exterminating New Zealand’s predators. However the reality is the dreams are running against the way Nature behaves.
Predator Role Wildlife mangers overseas are increasingly regarding predators as an important part of a healthy ecosystem. In 2014 Al S Glen of New Zealand’s Landcare Research and Christopher Dickman of Sydney University co-authored a book on “Carnivores of Australia” and in a chapter “The Importance of Predators” said “to maintain or restore functioning ecosystems, wildlife managers must consider the ecological importance of predators.” This is hardly a new idea. Charles Elton, an Oxford ecologist, first conceptualised food webs in the 1920s, speculating that wolf removal would result in over-population of deer on which wolves preyed. The notion was taken up by others such as highly respected conservationist and author Aldo Leopold. Predators tend to remove vulnerable prey, such as the old, injured, sick, or very young, leaving more food for the survival and success of healthy prey animals. Also, by controlling the size of prey populations, predators help slow down the spread of disease. Predators will catch healthy prey when they can, but catching sick or injured animals is more likely and helps in the formation of healthier prey populations because only the fittest animals survive and are able to reproduce. In addition, predators help to reduce the negative impacts that their prey may have on the ecosystem if they become too abundant or it they stayed in one area for too long. Biologists have recognised predators like cheetahs prey on grazing animals like antelope, it keeps the prey population moving around (in fear) and prevents overgrazing in any one area. As a result, more trees, shrubs, bushes, and grasses can grow, which then provides habitat for many other species.
Predator Removal Dangers If carnivores were removed from an ecosystem, what would happen? Herds of grazing animals, such as antelope, would grow and grow and result, in large herds overgrazing their food source, and as the food disappeared, the whole herd would begin to starve. Caroline Fraser writing for the US’s Yale School of the Environment said experts “beginning with aquatic experiments, have amassed considerable evidence of damage done to food chains by predator removal and have extended such studies to land.” Predators are simply a part of any ecosystem’s food chain. New Zealand’s native falcon prey on other native birds such as tuis and bellbirds. Blue duck (whio) prey almost entirely on aquatic invertebrates, mostly caddisfly larvae. Kiwi prey on worms. When animals of a predatory nature are introduced such as rats and stoats were to New Zealand, they go through a “boom and bust” phase before their populations settle down to a relatively static state. Unfortunately, native prey species can become drastically reduced or even extinct as a result of the predator “boom”. The critical aspect of managing this situation is avoiding predator “booms”. Consequently,the fervour and haste which the Department of Conservation and local councils applies with toxins is reckless and fraught with ecological danger.
Disastrous Outcomes Large scale poisoning with eco-toxins such as 1080 and brodifacoum may heavily reduce predator numbers initially but with a few short years, the outcome is disastrous. The science is there to show the resurgence in predator numbers and subsequent wrecking of the food chain. Wendy Ruscoe in a study published in Landcare Research’s publication 2008 showed aerial dropping of 1080 will temporarily knock back a rat population but due to the rodent’s amazing reproductive capacity, the surviving rats recover rapidly and within 18 months, are two to three times greater than before poisoning began. A 2007 study by Landcare scientists Graham Nugent and Peter Sweetapple showed rat numbers recovered within 18 months and at the two year mark, rat abundance could be four times greater than before poisoning.
Stoat Prey The disruption to the naive ecosystem ripples further. A major prey for stoats is rats. When rat numbers are reduced by 80% – 90%, the stoat deprived of its major food source, invariably switches prey to birds. But later as rat numbers surge and boom and pass original numbers, stoats enjoy a virtual banquet of rats, breeding increases and surges and then explodes.The well intentioned but ignorant predator extermination programme usually using 1080, has merely stimulated, within a few short years, major population explosions of rats and stoats. Attempting to poison-away rodent surges in beech-mast years is the ecological equivalent of farting against thunder. All this does (if anything) is delay the inevitable, as the fast-breeding ability of rodents will eventually allow population growth to match the food source. Rather than benefiting the birds and overall ecological health, there is massive ecological disruption by the man-induced mega rat and stoat plagues.
Ecological Damage That is not counting the birds and insects and other invertebrate organisms killed by 1080 as research demonstrated, by DSIR scientist Mike Meads, in the 1980’s. 1080 was originally patented as an insecticide in 1927. Examples are many of human interference directly or indirectly into Nature’s food chains resulting in profound consequences. In a classic 1966 experiment, biologist Robert Paine removed the purple seastar, Pisaster ochraceus — a voracious mussel-feeder — from an area of coastline in Washington state. Their predator gone, mussels exploded in numbers, crowding out biodiverse kelp communities with monoculture. Less than a decade after Pisaster, marine ecologists James Estes and John Palmisano reached the astonishing and widely reported conclusion that hunting of sea otters had caused the collapse of kelp forests around the Aleutian Islands. With otters reduced to low levels, the prey (sea urchins) stripped the kelp forests. When otters eventually returned, they regulated urchins, allowing “luxuriant” regrowth of biodiverse kelp communities.
Toheroa Decline In New Zealand, the decline of the toheroa shellfish was attributed unofficially to heavy over-fishing of snapper which preyed on paddle crabs which in turn preyed on toheroa. With the heavy decline in snapper, paddle crabs proliferated and almost obliterated toheroas. New Zealand has a long history of an obsession with attempted extermination of predators. In the 1950s acclimatisation societies managing trout fisheries blamed freshwater eels and shags for perceived declines in trout numbers. Bounties were paid out on eels. It had little effect. Ironically the best trout fishing rivers had healthy populations of both trout and eels. Eels simply removed the sick, the old or the unwary thus making for a quality trout population. The concept of being ”predator free” or “zero predators” has no ecological justification, except in limited circumstances on smaller offshore islands and “mainland islands”. Even in islands where predators may have been eliminated e.g. Secretary Island in Fiordland, the success is short-lived and temporary as animals can and do swim from the mainland to recolonise.
Playing God It seem incomprehensible that an agency such as the Department of Conservation and the Predator Free 2050 and ZIP concepts should go unquestioned in the light of the understanding internationally of the dangers of playing God with predators..But the ‘fly in the ointment’ is human nature. For example a scientist in DOC arguably has a vested interest by way of employment and a handsome salary. Similarly with any consulting scientist attached to Predator Free 2050 and ZIP. For others of zealous nature, as some humans are wont to be, it becomes the pursuit of “The Impossible Dream.” For politicians it’s good P.R. to declare war on the baddies, no matter how pointless and damaging that might be. The sad outcomes are the gross misuse of public funds and more tragically the profound ecological damage that often occurs in the pursuit of that “Impossible Dream.”
Tony Orman has spent a lifetime in the outdoors observing and reading about it and Nature. He has had some two dozen books published, mainly on fishing, deerstalking, conservation and rural life.
‘Silent No More’ is a story that every New Zealander must hear. This story is a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial service in front of parliament last week, it is a tribute to the Wellington Freedom Camp, and most importantly it is a tribute to the tens of thousands of Kiwis (probably a lot more) who have been so badly impacted by the COVID-19 vaccine.
‘Silent No More’ is a collective production of so many passionate Kiwis who just want the truth known. New Zealand needs to know the truth.
Is this the biggest scandal in New Zealand’s history?
This is a question that can only really be answered if the full truth and the full evidence is known and assessed by the people of New Zealand. Thankfully that may be beginning to happen now. But one thing is for certain. The biggest victims of this situation are now coming together, they are uniting to support each other, they are uniting to tell their stories, and they will be SILENT NO MORE.
An important point to note here. This is not an anti-vax story at all, and the information presented here is not anti-vax in any way. This is simply information and evidence about one particular vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine.
On March 29th the ‘Silent No More’ movement was officially born in New Zealand. It was an event that was created out of a collective vision and a collective effort of numerous passionate Kiwis from around the country who all had a shared desire and need to come together to tell their story and to just be heard. People from right across the country gathered in front of parliament in a memorial service to grieve together, to tell their stories together, and to deliver their petition with 12,000 signatures (gathered in just 5 days) to parliament.
Some were grieving for the health that they, and so many fellow Kiwis, have now lost. Many permanently. Some were grieving for their loved ones who have paid the ultimate price from taking the COVID-19 vaccine. All were grieving for what has been done collectively to their country and its people. There were tears. A lot of tears. But it was a watershed moment for these people, and for the thousands of others who couldn’t be there but wanted to. No longer would they be hushed up, ignored, and ridiculed by their government and the media.
‘Little White Crosses’ is a moving song written by NZ song writer Aly Cook as a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial on March 29thhttps://youtu.be/2vdvE4HmplQ It is a reference and a tribute to all those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ that were hanging peacefully on a long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp.
The people of New Zealand MUST know the truth about what has really happened in this country since the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine began in mid 2021. Not what we have been told on an almost daily basis on our television screens from the government’s podium of the ‘single source of truth’, and not what we have been told by our mainstream media who have been paid $55 million+ by that ‘single source of truth’.
Before we proceed here, the following are a few sobering facts (not misinformation) that will not be told to the people of New Zealand from the ‘single source of truth’.
In New Zealand the current number of COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions recorded on the official MedSafe database is more than 58,000. Recording a vaccine adverse reaction on the MedSafe database is not a quick and easy exercise that can be done in two minutes if you have a sore arm from the shot. It takes a lot of time and detail. You need to be committed to the cause to go into the system and input the required information. So it’s a fair bet that the majority of those 58,000+ Kiwis, or their doctors, who have taken the time and effort to do that would have had a significant reason to do it.
The majority of those 58,000+ adverse reactions have been recorded by doctors rather than the public, contrary to what the mainstream media have been saying. It is broadly agreed across the medical field around the world that only between 1% and 10% of vaccine adverse reactions will be officially recorded. Now do the maths on that one for New Zealand’s current figure.
There has been a massive increase in New Zealand, and around the world, of myocarditis (a crippling and life shortening injury to the heart) and pericarditis since the COVID vaccine rollout began. Hospitals across the country are bursting with these and similar heart related problems from the COVID-19 vaccine. So much so that on December 15th, 2021 the Ministry of Health sent a letter to all doctors in New Zealand titled ‘Urgent update on COVID-19 Vaccine-associated Myocarditis and Pericarditis’ highlighting the issue of myocarditis in relation to the COVID vaccine. The graph below shows the official government data for myocarditis and pericarditis in the United States over the last 12 years.
According to NZDSOS (NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science) there have so far been at least 400+ deaths in New Zealand from the COVID vaccine. If we also apply the rule of thumb regarding numbers of deaths recorded versus the actual number (between 1% to 10%), then this becomes a difficult point to think about.
It’s hard to say exactly how many people in New Zealand have had life changing injuries or have died from the COVID-19 vaccine, but what is very clear as the evidence is increasingly showing, and as more and more people come forward with their stories, is that the number is EXTREMELY high. The damage from the COVID vaccine is like nothing that has been seen with any other vaccine in history. Not even close. That is not just in New Zealand, that is a global situation.
As a picture of vaccine injury catastrophe becomes clearer by the day, Pfizer and the New Zealand government may eventually try to say that they were just trying to do the right thing for the safety of the country, and that they couldn’t have known this type of catastrophic vaccine fall-out would happen. But shockingly, that has now been proven not to be the case. Pfizer and the New Zealand government absolutely did know. They had all the absolutely damning safety data showing this to be the case, and they both forged ahead regardless. It has now been confirmed that Pfizer knew full well from their initial safety trials, and from very early on in the vaccine roll out around the world, that their COVID-19 vaccine had devastating and unprecedented levels of serious adverse effects, including huge and historically unprecedented levels of fatalities.
As questions and scrutiny from doctors, scientists, and the public has intensified around the world regarding the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, this resulted in a stunning new development at the end of 2021 and early 2022 regarding safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Through a ‘Freedom of Information Act’ request by a group of doctors and scientists in the United States, a Federal judge ruled that the FDA (Federal Drug Agency tasked with authorising vaccines for public use) must release the 55,000 pages of safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Previously the FDA had requested that this data be locked up and withheld from the public for 75 years. Why would they want to bury that safety data for 75 years?
The first batches of this safety data have now been released to the public over the last two months and the information released so far is absolutely shocking. It is medically horrific. Hence why the FDA and Pfizer were desperate to keep it hidden for so long.
A total of 1,223 deaths were officially attributed to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in just the first three months (December 2020 to the end of February 2021) of the initial Pfizer vaccine roll out through various countries. Just as a point of historic comparison, in the past a vaccine trial or a vaccine programme would be immediately shut down with just a handful of fatalities. The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine recorded 1,223 official fatalities in just three months and nothing was said or done by Pfizer or the FDA. Remember, the official figures typically only represent 1% to 10% of the real number.
As well as the huge number of fatalities, there were 42,086 adverse reactions officially recorded during that initial three month period. 58% of these 42,086 adverse reactions were classified as being serious, and at the time of publication of that Pfizer report 11,361 of those people had still not recovered. So the bottom line here is that the number of vaccine injuries in the first three months of the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was enormous, with the majority of those injuries being serious and long lasting. The fatality rate of the vaccine was quite simply in a different universe to what had ever been seen before in the history of vaccines.
While this is absolutely shocking information to try to comprehend, what is even more shocking is the evidence obtained in January 2022 around the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand. Through a request for information through the NZ ‘Official Information Act’, it is now confirmed and admitted by MedSafe that the New Zealand government were fully aware of this shocking and unprecedented Pfizer safety data when they rolled out their massive nationwide vaccination drive starting in mid 2021, several months after this Pfizer data was first known. The New Zealand government knew about this damning and unprecedented safety data when they rolled out their ‘90% vaxxed’ marketing campaign, they knew about it when they enforced their ‘no jab, no job’ mandates, and they knew about it when they implemented medical apartheid across the country with their vaccine passports to try to force the entire population to take the vaccine. The New Zealand government knew about the damning Pfizer safety data as they continued to drum out their ‘safe and effective’ mantra from their podium of truth to the people of New Zealand, and they demonised anyone daring to challenge this as being ‘vaccine hesitant’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, and dangerous peddlers of ‘vaccine misinformation’.
Here is an extract from the response from MedSafe to that ‘Official Information Act’ request. Among a number of questions asked to Medsafe in that request, here is Question 1;
“Please provide information to show when Pfizer or its agents first provided to any representative of the NZ government a copy of the CUMULATIVE-ANALYSIS-OF-POST-AUTHORIZATION-ADVERSE-EVENTREPORTS-OF-PF-07302048-BNT162B2-RECEIVED-THROUGH-28-FEB-2021 that was recently released through the US courts, ‘when did the New Zealand government first know about the safety data in that Pfizer report?’
(the same Pfizer safety data mentioned above)
The response from MedSafe to this question was;
“I can advise that as a part of the provisional consent for the Comirnaty COVID-19 granted in New Zealand under the Medicines Act 1981, Pfizer has provided the same data, albeit in a form that meets the company’s legal obligations in New Zealand. The conclusions of the Cumulative Analysis Report are consistent with the information and data provided by Pfizer to Medsafe as a part of its provisional consent obligations in New Zealand.”
Here is a link to the full letter of response from MedSafe.
Therefore, the New Zealand government had that exact same safety data as that damning Pfizer report when they made the decision to give the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine provisional consent for ‘emergency use authorisation’ in New Zealand and gave the go ahead to implement New Zealand’s mass COVID-19 vaccine roll out. A quite stunning and sobering thought that this could occur in this country.
Incredibly, it gets even worse than this. The Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) essentially forced all doctors and health practitioners in New Zealand to support their ‘safe and effective’ narrative, and prohibited any discussion by these medical professionals that was in any way contrary to this narrative. They sent a letter to every doctor and health practitioner in New Zealand and effectively forced them not to deviate from the official government narrative about the COVID-19 vaccine being ‘safe and effective’. Here is an extract from that letter:
“As regulators we respect an individual’s right to have their own opinions, but it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners.”
These doctors and health practitioners across the country have been seeing and dealing with unprecedented and truly shocking numbers of serious heart problems, blood clots, neurological issues, and numerous other serious adverse reactions from the COVID vaccine, and they have not been allowed to say anything to the New Zealand public other than to reinforce the COVID vaccine as ‘safe and effective’. Any doctors that have attempted to speak out and raise any kind of concerns about the COVID vaccine have been swiftly dealt to and suspended, and demonised by the mainstream media.
Therefore, every single one of the 95% of people in New Zealand who have taken the COVID vaccine have taken it under illegal circumstances. They have taken it without the legally required informed consent as they were not given the information about the true safety data that the government and the Ministry of Health knowingly had at the time, and doctors were prevented from raising any concerns with their patients so that the people of New Zealand could make an informed decision.
The New Zealand government effectively ‘forced’ 95% of the country to take the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine knowing full well the shocking safety data and fatality rate of that vaccine. A significant number of those 95% will have taken the COVID vaccine under severe duress and essentially against their will as so many people in New Zealand had seemingly very well founded concerns about this particular vaccine, but they felt they had no option but to take it due to the job mandates and/or vaccine passports. So many Kiwis have now paid a very large price for that.
Now, as more and more people in New Zealand come forward and are ‘silent no more’, we are starting to see what the true, awful impact of this has been. All the hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ hanging peacefully on that long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp. Those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling there every day right in front of all the politicians inside the Beehive as a daily reminder to them that they had sanctioned the use of that Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine despite what was known about it, and they had also sanctioned the extreme measures implemented to ensure that nearly every person in New Zealand felt they had little choice but to take it. Is this why not one single politician inside the Beehive was prepared to come out and just speak with and listen to these people during those three weeks of the Wellington Freedom Camp?
As those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling in front of our politician’s offices eventually became just a little too emotionally awkward for them, on March 2nd those ‘little white crosses’ were unmercifully ripped down, burned to ashes, and banished from sight. But that has not ended things for the huge number of Kiwis whose lives have been destroyed, and whose loved ones are no longer with us.
21.5K subscribers Acorns are a super sustainable source of sustenance that you can forage from the forest to your front yard! In this video, Wren discusses the different types of acorns, how to identify a good nut, foraging tips, processing acorn meat, and how to use your acorns to make DELICIOUS food. Let us know if you have any acorn recipes below! NOTE: The labels on the oak leaves at 3:57 are swapped- the left leaf is a white oak and the right leaf is a red oak. Read more in Wren’s Insteading Article https://insteading.com/blog/how-to-ea…
0:00 Intro 0:55 Acorns as a food source 2:55 Foraging Acorns 4:15 Good and Bad Nuts 6:15 White Acorns and Red Acorns 7:00 Acorn Weevil Larvae 7:27 Cracking Nuts 8:04 Sorting and Prepping 9:20 Leaching 10:20 Acorn Flour 11:15 Acorn Recipes 13:55 Additional Resources 14:54 Conclusion
“The deliberately inaccurate reporting by New Zealand’s mainstream newsrooms of police breaching the peace to eject the Freedom Occupation means such news outlets have separately, and together, breached section 240 of the Crimes Act, which deals with crimes of deceit.” Steve Edwards
Dear New Zealand Press Council, NZ Broadcasting Standards Authority and Commerce Commission,
RE: Failure to Report Police Breaching the Peace to Disrupt the Freedom Occupation
The deliberately inaccurate reporting by New Zealand’s mainstream newsrooms of police breaching the peace to eject the Freedom Occupation means such news outlets have separately, and together, breached section 240 of the Crimes Act, which deals with crimes of deceit.
The police objective on February 10th, 21st and 22nd was to produce scenes of violence, with the confidence that the mainstream media would not bother to accurately report the clustered events. The modus operandi of the NZ Police has been to bait protesters, knowing the biased media of New Zealand would maintain a lack of fairness and balance by promoting discrimination against the Parliamentary Occupation.
Riot cops used gas and fists to clear Parliament grounds of peaceful protesters—and “our free press” MAKES UP scenes of mob violence AGAINST the cops … Mark Crispin Miller
Check out the gap between the media’s propaganda and what really happened … [recently] in Wellington; then ask yourself if there are any US/Western “news” reports that any thinking person can believe.
From America’s “newspaper of record”:
In chaotic and sometimes bloody clashes, protesters wielded fire extinguishers, paint-filled projectiles, homemade plywood shields and pitchforks. Some lobbed cobblestones at officers. Others piled detritus onto gas-fueled fires, including one that caused an explosion at a playground near Parliament.
I saw the analogy drawn recently to the boa constrictor and how with each relax of its grip it then tightens even more. Knowing what we do about the agenda of the globalists this makes perfect sense. It was right there from the start, the promises by JA there would be no mandates. A year later? Mandates. Two weeks to flatten the curve. Two years later? Less freedoms. One thing is certain, you cannot trust a globalist. They lie with impunity. EWR
An easier read from thebuzz.nz: The WHO wants countries to sign a new Covid-19 treaty in only about 2 months. This treaty would have the “WHO Constitution” take precedence over a country’s constitution during natural disasters or pandemics. This would allow them to make their “guidelines” mandatory to the public of all countries who sign. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second highest donor to the WHO, after the US government. We know how this would end. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberge worked for the WHO for 20 years. She says that every country should send a public letter of protest to the WHO, saying that their people DO NOT accept a signature of their Minister of Health. WHO wants all countries to sign this letter before May 2022.
BREAKING – EMERGENCY: Dr. Astrid Stukelberger, PhD: World Health Dictatorship by Treaty to replace the Constitutions of the Nations (20 February 2022)
The following is a transcript made on Wednesday, 23 February 2022, between 5h56 am and 3h31 pm of Dr. Astrid Stukelberger giving her main presentation of about 24 minutes’ length. The video panel discussion continues but has not been transcribed. Some of Dr. Stukelberger’s comments may need clarification.
READ / LISTEN AT THE LINK:
ABOUT THE TREATY:
An international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness
World Health Assembly agrees to launch negotiations for an agreement to fight pandemics
On 1 December 2021, the 194 members of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached consensus to kickstart the process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
An intergovernmental negotiating body will now be constituted and hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 1 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft). It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.
“Foraging and wildcrafting for your own food and medicine is a great way to get outside and reap the benefits of being out in wild areas. It gives you access to some of the most nutrient rich and healing plants, all while getting some much needed exercise and fresh air. Foraging is good for your body as well as your mind and soul! I love teaching others about the benefits of wild food.
Ever since I’ve been a wild food forager I’ve always known about chickweed, but for a long time I didn’t come in contact with it all that much.
This is strange, because chickweed is really quite a common and abundant plant!
It’s not that I had never seen it, I know that I had pointed it out on a few occasions, but I think that more often than not I was simply overlooking it.
Chickweed is a small and unassuming plant, that’s for sure. Thankfully, foraging for chickweed is very easy once you know what to look for. You’ll be seeing it everywhere, maybe even in your own backyard!
If ever there were an herb that puts existential fear into the bottom line of pharmaceutical companies, its turmeric. Here are a few thousand reasons why…
Turmeric is one the most thoroughly researched plants in existence today. Its medicinal properties and components (primarily curcumin) have been the subject of over 12,000 peer-reviewed and published biomedical studies. In fact, our five-year long research project on this sacred plant has revealed over 800 potential preventive and therapeutic applications, as well as 250 distinct beneficial physiological effects.
You must be logged in to post a comment.