To say that the HPV vaccine is controversial would be a serious understatement. A number of experts have spoken out against the vaccine since its release, and studies have revealed serious problems. Children and teenagers have died or been permanently disabled following HPV vaccination, yet it remains on the market.
Story at-a-glance
A number of experts have spoken out against the HPV vaccine since its release. An eight-month investigation revealed shocking flaws in Merck’s clinical trial design, which effectively prevented assessment of safety
Many of the side effects experienced during the vaccine trial were simply recorded as “medical history,” and were not treated as adverse events; serious adverse events arising outside of a two-week period post-vaccination were marked down as “medical history”
More than 80 million girls, young women and boys have received the HPV vaccine, and many have paid an extraordinarily high price, coming down with nervous system disorders, chronic fatigue and autoimmune diseases
According to Merck’s own research, if you have been exposed to HPV strains 16 or 18 prior and then get vaccinated, you may increase your risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6 percent
HPV infection is spread through sexual contact and research has demonstrated that using condoms can reduce risk of HPV infection by 70 percent, which is far more effective than the HPV vaccine
More than 20 newborns remain hospitalised in intensive care units but appear to be improving nearly two weeks after showing signs of blood poisoning following a hepatitis B vaccine.
Health officials are still struggling to determine and explain what led to the severe reactions and the deaths of three newborns at Bago Region General Hospital. But parents of seven infants medevacked to Yankin Children’s Hospital in Yangon are convinced of the culprit that has their sons and daughters struggling for life.
“It was the vaccine. What else could it be?” said Ko Aung Soe.
The infants’ tribulations, which began just hours after their birth, have underscored the country’s underfunded and ailing health system, revealing the toll of medical shortages and doctors ill-appraised of national policies.
“I feel hopeless,” Ko Aung Soe Myint said. “So far, no doctor has even explained why my daughter is sick.”
At first, Ko Aung Soe Myint thought his daughter was the only one affected with seizures and difficulty breathing. She was born in the morning on March 7. Around noon a nurse came to administer a hepatitis B vaccine. Within four hours something appeared to have gone wrong.
“Her skin colour started turning blue. Doctors came and they took her to a special ward. They wouldn’t say why,” he said. He added that he had not seen his daughter receive any other medication or injections.
“In the evening, other babies in a similar condition arrived at the special treatment ward. After midnight the doctors called all the parents, and said, ‘your children are not well.’ But they didn’t explain what was happening,” he said.
The Smarden 1080/1081 poisoning is important as an incident because it led to the banning of this chemical in the UK and later the EU. A ‘large number’ of rats and other animals died as a result of a poisoned pony used as pet food and at least 20 horses and cattle died as a result of the contaminated water near a 1080 pesticide factory. From my own read of the article & the poisonings around the factory, there were 78 domestic animals poisoned (cats & dogs), seven sheep, 20 odd cows & several calves, one goat and two guinea pigs. (There are two articles here):
The forgotten story of how a toxic spill and a book launched Britain’s environmental movement
Today we take for granted an awareness of environmental matters, but this was not always the case. It could be said that in Britain there was a moment when that environmental consciousness arrived. When in 1963 some farm animals in the parish of Smarden in Kent became sick and died, suspicions fell on a nearby pesticide factory run by a division of Rentokil Laboratories. The events that followed amounted to one of the first environmental scandals in contemporary British history – one that would galvanise the environmental movement.
It became clear that the factory, a large shed in the middle of farmland, was manufacturing toxic chemicals and that a leak of one of these, fluoroacetamide, led to Britain’s first documented livestock mass poisoning. The incident might have passed by as only a historical footnote, but instead the Smarden leak quickly became a national concern with international implications, and has cast a long shadow across the approach to intensive agriculture in the UK in the years since.
Part of why this incident had such major repercussions is due to timing, coming as it did at the same time as American writer Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring was first published in the UK. Seen as the first polemic of the environmental movement, Carson’s book was a significant catalyst to the emergence of modern environmentalism on both sides of the Atlantic.
Local veterinarian Douglas Good had unique knowledge of fluoride poisoning having worked with a leading expert in South Africa and on cases of animals affected by industrial fluoride poisoning in England. Taking his cue from Carson, Good disseminated what he called a “short story” about the incident to the press, putting across the Smarden incident as not simply a local industrial waste spill, but as deadly evidence of the pervasiveness of toxic pesticides in the environment. Acknowledging his inspiration, Good concluded his narrative by declaring that the “subject of Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring had become a reality here in the heart of the Garden of England”.
The media placed the Smarden incident within a Carson-inspired ecological critique of the dangers of an intensive, industrial approach to agriculture. Good, like Carson, was a trained scientist. Like her, he raised concerns about technocracy – governmental administration underpinned by scientific and technological expertise. As the Smarden incident unfolded, it highlighted the risks and hazards which accompanied the government’s commitment to industrial development. Tensions arose between veterinarians, government scientists, local government, media, and business interests.
A chemical double agent
While the use of inorganic poisons as pesticides stretches back to antiquity, large-scale use of organic pesticides is a 20th-century phenomenon. Fluoroacetamide is a toxic organic pesticide with nefarious origins.
A cartoon that appeared in Punch on February 12, 1964).Punch, Author provided
The two world wars fostered a massive growth of the chemical industry, and fluoroacetamide was a pesticide that arose from the search for lethal chemical weapons. After the war it was approved for use as a poison for use against rodents and insects – it was not uncommon for the science, technology, institutions, and language of chemical warfare to be redirected to the problem of agricultural pest control during peacetime. But by the time of the Smarden incident in the early 1960s, the origin of these chemicals was seen as damning evidence of the perniciousness of the military-industrial complex and its impact on the environment.
by F.D.T. Good, M.R.C.V.S.
I live and practice in Tenterden near the village of Smarden in the Weald of Kent where
there is a small factory, which makes orchard sprays.
In January 1963, a man who worked at the factory brought a four-month old Labrador
puppy to my surgery. It was having convulsions and after treatment appeared to be
making an uneventful recovery. Two weeks later the puppy was brought back to the
surgery, together with its litter brother. Both were dead, having had fits earlier in the day.
The owner suspected poisoning and wanted a post mortem examination. I explained the
difficulties of this unless one knew what poison to suspect, and reluctantly he went away
not knowing what had killed his puppies which had been so well that morning.
On Benenden Fair Day, a Saturday in mid-May, I was called to GREAT OMENDEN FARM
where a client had lost five sheep suddenly. They were being loaded for sale. A few
minutes before they appeared normal and just sank to the ground and were dead. This
was a mile from the factory. The post-mortem examination revealed nothing of
significance to indicate the cause of death. I was baffled. The Veterinary Investigation
Centre at Wye had closed down for the weekend. A sixth sheep died at Benenden Fair and a seventh with the new owner at Rye. Sheep can die suddenly from a number of infectious diseases but there was no reason to suspect any of these.
The farm manager asked me whether I had heard about three of his neighbour’s cows,
which died a few days before. This was Mr. Jull and his sons Cyril and Norman at Roberts
Farm. It was a fine afternoon and this was my last visit of the day, so we took a walk along a stream, which ran through his neighbour’s land. We noticed that the further we went upstream, the less clear the water became. The vegetation in the ditches was black and dead. The stream originated alongside the factory, which made pesticides. The water on which the cattle and sheep depended for drinking water became suspected. Water
samples were collected and internal organs from the dead sheep were taken to the County Analytical Laboratory at Maidstone. Telephone calls to my neighbouring veterinary practice at Ashford established that they had been attending three cows at Roberts Farm. We were mystified. They knew the factory made methyl bromide, and one of the ponds smelt of bromide.
The following day, Sunday, I was called urgently to attend a goat at Limes Land Farm
which lay directly across the main road from the factory. This client used to work there
and I asked him what they made. Amongst the many pesticides he mentioned was
fluoroacetamide (1081), a rat poison. The goat was trembling and in a convulsive state.
She died a few hours later. Many meetings transpired between the Ashford veterinary practice, the factory manager and myself. Analytical test results bean to come through. Fluorides were present to the extent of 5 parts per million, but bromides were a hundred times more. Sulphuric acid was also present in the water. The sheep specimens revealed no chemicals of any significance. Testing of the ditches and ponds for bromides were carried out at intervals.
The acid had been neutralized by the factory management with washing soda and only
bromides appeared to remain. Testing for fluorides was abandoned in view of the alarming quantities of bromide present. The Kent River Board, responsible for the
prevention of pollution of watercourses was alerted. The factory manager told me that
fluoroacetamide could not possibly have got into the ditches, but he was able to account
for the bromides and acid. The black chemical residue from the manufacture of
fluoroacetamide had been pumped out onto the factory land for months and the Kent
River Board assured me that this could only be carried downwards into the soil.
All ditches and ponds on Great Omenden, Kelsham and Roberts Farms were fenced off to
prevent access by livestock. The remainder of the young Friesian herd on Roberts Farm
was kept under close observation by the Ashford veterinary surgeons. No more deaths
occurred and we felt a little easier. We had at least prevented further deaths. Mr. Lowe, the farmer at Great Omenden, also kept pigs, poultry and cattle, as well as two
pet dogs, one of them a sturdy and obedient foxhound. A month after the sheep deaths,
and after all acid had disappeared from his ponds and ditches, the foxhound was taken ill at night. I will use the housekeepers words:- “At 1 am he jumped onto my bed, a thing he never does…his eyes staring and big…trembling a little and teeth bared as he panted and seemed mad…I was frightened…I let him out of the bedroom and he fell downstairs…he stumbled out of doors and went onto the green…there he fell over, head bent backwards and his legs kicking as he gasped for air…a horrible noise from his throat as he breathed…his eyes were very big…then he got up, looking wildly around, then shot away and we did not see him again alive.”
His actions were suggestive of fearful hallucinations. The following morning he was
found drowned in a pond. A post-mortem examination in the forecourt of my surgery
showed only the signs of death from drowning, and the big meal he had eaten the evening before was undigested in his stomach. The owner could not accept my post-mortem certificate. What had caused the madness before he bolted away in terror? I explained this as being due to severe abdominal pain and colic. The dog had been out hunting the previous afternoon and given a big meal on his return that evening, when he was in an exhausted condition. Mr. Lowe was still not satisfied. He had lost sheep, his neighbour had lost cattle, this was still poisoning! But how could it be? The water analyses for acid and bromide were almost normal, and the bromides, if responsible, would only have a sedative effect and not one of stimulation. Doubt grew in my mind. The Veterinary Investigation Centre was not so concerned with dogs, and besides they would be reluctant to intervene as litigation might be involved. Meanwhile the cows at Roberts Farm were reported to be normal to the casual observer.
Cyril Jull knew their milk yields had fallen, they were less alert than usual, and they were easily tired. If made to hurry, they would stop and pant like a dog. A few calves, which were born strong and healthy, died in convulsions before they were a few hours old. Mr. Patterson, the Ministry Veterinary Surgeon at Wye was again pressed to come to our aid. Yes, he was willing to do so if we could tell him what poison to look for. The factory sold scores of pesticides, from the more complex chlorinated hydrocarbons, DDT,
Lindane, Parathion, down to the simpler copper, arsenic, zinc and sulphur ones. Was one
to start at the top of the list and work down, or try one’s luck with a pin? The de la Warr
Laboratories at Oxford offered me their help and in July a team of three visited Tenterden and took apparatus out to Roberts Farm. Within minutes of setting up their apparatus they diagnosed fluoroacetate (1080), much to the surprise of the farmer and myself.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL. WORKING DOCUMENT. Intellectual Property of Clean Green New Zealand Trust, Reg Charity no: CC54185. Collated by Dr Ursula Edgington, Michelle Terry, Clyde & Steve Graf, Kathy White and Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc, RSHDipPHI & other citizens.
New Zealand Register of Unintended human, stock, wildlife, dogs, native birds & aquatic life. and other poisoning incidents and deaths from aerial Compound 1080 & brodifacoum operations between 1954 and 2018. http://1080science.co.nz/
Back in 1994 Dr Meriel Watts wrote in her book The Poisoning of New Zealand*, of constant phone calls to the Soil & Health Assn by folk asking … “Is 1080 safe & do I have to let them drop it on my property?” The Association’s view at the time she said was ‘no’ and ‘no’. Soil & Health’s submission to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s Possum Management review stated that “the current practice of distributing by air large amounts of 1080-laced carrot and pollard baits over large areas has lead to unacceptable risks to the environment, human health, dogs, farm stock, birds and other members of the ecosystem.” (p 186, 187).
That submission cited various incidents experienced by farmers.
“In one case a South Island farm lost 570 ewes when 1080 was dropped in his pastures as a result of the helicopter swinging too wide when dropping over bush patches. His sheep were still dying up to six months later; there were also a large number of abortions.” (Dr M Watts, p 187)
“In another case … a central North Island farmer came home to find 1080 spread all over her farm and around her house. There was a nice sign stating this fact, but no prior notification and no prior permission given. Fortunately her dogs were locked up.” (Dr M Watts, p 187)
We seldom of course hear of these incidents as they are not normally featured by mainstream media. It has been highlighted via the GrafBoys’ information that these stats are actually hidden in the paper work. Farmers, when claiming compensation, are required to list that compensation as for purposes other than poisoned stock losses.
Please read the comments below as a farmer has shared about the loss of his dogs to likely 1080 poisoning.
See tv-wild.co.nz also for further info from the GrafBoys. Watch the video on topic at their Youtube channel here.
Photo: Pixabay.com (note, not the actual farm or farmer in the article).
*The Poisoning of New Zealand by Dr Meriel Watts, Ak Institute of Technology Press, 1994
So this department overseeing the health of the public can’t find 32 years of vaccine safety research? Time to get reading the independent research to date isn’t it? As many folk already are.
The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act started the process to fully absolve pharmaceutical companies from liability for the injuries and deaths their vaccine products cause. In addition, the 1986 Act also removed the normal market forces and legal repercussions which exist to ensure safer vaccine products. By giving economic immunity to Big Pharma, it removed any incentive for those companies to maintain, improve on and guarantee the safety of their vaccines.
Instead, the 1986 Act put the US Health and Human Services (HHS) in charge of doing continued safety and quality monitoring of the vaccines comprising America’s recommended vaccine schedule. HHS was tasked with two jobs: to end infectious disease and to reduce the risk of vaccine injury. Specifically, the 1986 Act states in subsection a, that HHS shall:
“promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions than those vaccines on the market…” and to “make or assure improvements in…the manufacturing, testing, warning, field surveillance, adverse reaction reporting and researching on vaccines in order to reduce the risk of adverse reactions to vaccines.”
There was also a deadline for HHS to adhere to when applying the above mandated criteria. The 1986 Act states:
“Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit…a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection a…”
Last year, Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to HHS asking for any documents related to the work done by HHS pursuant to the mandate laid out in the 1986 Act. In short, the FOIA request asked for any reports HHS has given the US Congress over the last 32 years that show they are making vaccines safer. After HHS was unable to produce the requested documents, ICAN, along with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit gave HHS three options:
To give all the information as requested in the original FOIA request
To give a credible explanation why HHS can’t disclose the information; or
To admit HHS doesn’t have any documents which would show they have done what they were tasked to do
In the end, HHS recently settled with what is called a court ordered stipulation, admitting the following:
Progressive Radio Network presents A Gary Null Production WAR ON HEALTH: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny Introduced by the director (from his speech at the world premiere in New York City, June 15, 2012) In the near future, American medical practice may change dramatically for the worse. No longer will maximal dose natural supplements—vitamins, natural compounds, and scientifically proven medicinal herbs—be available over the counter in local health and grocery stores. Holistic practice, which relies upon non-prescription natural treatments instead of Big Pharma drugs prescribed life-long, will diminish. American healthcare will be imprisoned, patients will be forced to abide by a single medical paradigm defined by corporate drug and food executives and dictated by a government enforcement agency, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This is the bleak scenario if the FDA succeeds in limiting Americans’ options to prevent and treat diseases. ‘War on Health’ is the first documentary detailing and challenging the FDA agenda and its allegiance with the international Codex Alimentarius, which hopes to establish a monolithic food and health regime. Betraying its founding mandate to assure drug, food and chemical safety in the interests of public health, the FDA today is a repressive bureaucracy serving pharmaceutical and agricultural greed and profits. Vaccines, medical devices, prescription drugs are fast tracked at alarming rates through the FDA at the expense of scientific oversight to assure their efficacy and safety. The result is hundreds of thousands premature deaths annually from pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines and medical devices and an epidemic of medical incompetence and fraud sanctioned by federal health officials. Featuring many pioneering American and European attorneys, physicians, medical researchers and advocates of health freedom, War on Health lifts the veil on FDA’s militaristic operations against organic food providers and alternative physicians. The film’s conclusion is perfectly clear: the FDA is a tyrannical cult founded upon the denial of sound medical science with little intention to improve the nation’s health and prevent disease. Written and Directed by Gary Null Produced by Valerie Van Cleve Associate Producer: Richard Gale Editor: Richie Williamson Offline Editing: Valerie Van Cleve, L.A. Jones Camera Operators: Marcello Coppuchino, Peter Bonilla, David Grier, L.A. Jones Gregory Jason Russ, Jake Hammer Mesmire, Edson Tanakae, Valerie Van Cleve, Richie Williamson
Over 65 dogs each year are killed in New Zealand by 1080 poisoning. With 1080 frequency and use increasing across New Zealand, pet deaths are on the rise.
READ MORE (and check out the site for other data on 1080 & protecting your pets)
“Everywhere these vaccines have been used, child mortality has gone down” says the vaccinologist. Whilst in the US, the country that’s pushing mandatory vaccines, has the highest infant mortality rate in the world, that from an ex Merck whistleblower.
Karl and Christine Laulu continue to grieve for two babies lost after vaccinations in Samoa
In the last three years, a young couple from Samoa have been blessed with the births of their two children.
They celebrated their first birthdays and, in the last two years, farewelled them at two separate funerals.
Karl and Christine Laulu continue to deal with the nightmare of losing two precious babies in a span of two years; both taken shortly after receiving a measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination in Samoa.
The couple now live in New Zealand and are working to find out exactly how or why their children died.
The second article on topic is also from the NZ Herald:
Samoa has seized all MMR vaccines after deaths of two toddlers
Samoan health authorities have stopped all children’s vaccinations in the island nation after the deaths of two toddlers.
A full inquiry into the circumstances of the deaths has also been launched at the request of Prime Minister Tuilaepa Lupesoliai Sailele Malielegaoi.
The situation comes after two children, both aged 1, died minutes after receiving an MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccination at Safotu Hospital, in Savaii, on Friday.
The youngsters have been identified as Lannacallystah Samuelu, daughter of Marietta and Samuelu Tuisuesue, and Lameko Si’u, son of Punipuao and Timua Si’u.
MMR VACCINE KILLS TWO BABIES; The Island Nation of Samoa is reeling. Officials have seized all MMR Vaccines, and ordered practitioners to cease use of the vaccine pending further investigation. HighWire reveals this is not the first story of tragedy in the tumultous history of the MMR #vaccine. Follow The HighWire with Del Bigtree Thursdays at 11am pacific. This is The #HighWire
We followed the Grenfell Tower disaster (crime) for a time & have revisited it again recently with the anniversary this month. Many of those people are still not rehoused from that shameful gentrification debacle. If you visit the blogs of the Grenfell Action Group you’ll see as is common with these corporate coverups, a long standing battle with landlords/Councils etc over the lack of safety & the fire risk in that tower before & immediately prior to the disaster. I believe also from many reports on the ground that the numbers of fatalaties were also vastly under stated. People were also advised (as is apparently customary) to remain in their apartments, thereby more fatalities occurred. What a crime. Human life – the shameful ‘throw away’ mentality of those who ride on the backs of the poor. The cladding was the cheaper option … it saved money & lost lives. As for NZ, remember the CTV building in the Christchurch earthquake? Nobody has been held accountable for the many lives lost in that building and should have been. And we have similar inflammable fire risk cladding on our buildings? No worries, they have got that all covered we’re told….
Owners of the buildings have been told about the claddings but McCormick stressed the buildings were not necessarily dangerous to occupy because they had extensive fire protection measures such as sprinklers, alarms and escape routes.
Auckland Council has just released a list of 25 buildings with exterior aluminium composite claddings like the Grenfell Tower in London, where a fire last year killed more than 70 people.
But the council stressed the Auckland buildings with the flammable polyethylene cores in their claddings are not necessarily dangerous because they have other means of fire protection.
The huge Waitakere Stadium at Henderson, certain Auckland Hospital buildings in Grafton, Spark’s four-building campus in Victoria St, large residential blocks in the Viaduct and CBD, the huge PwC building on the city’s waterfront, TVNZ’s headquarters on Victoria St, Auckland University’s Owen Glenn Building and many apartment blocks appear on the list.
After a Herald official information request, the council named 116 buildings it said “appear to utilise ACP cladding to some extent”.
“In some cases the cladding material has a modified fire resistant core. Far fewer cases have cladding with a combustible polyethylene core,” said council building consents general manager Ian McCormick.
“The extent and use of ACP on the buildings varies considerably from the full facade, to decorative features only and many buildings examined did not contain ACP at all,” he said.
Owners of the buildings have been told about the claddings but McCormick stressed the buildings were not necessarily dangerous to occupy because they had extensive fire protection measures such as sprinklers, alarms and escape routes.
The Manchester, New Hampshire, fire department responds to more calls for drug overdoses than fires these days. In 2015, 33,091 Americans died from an opioid-related overdose; 15,281 were by prescription
In a recent episode of 60 Minutes, DEA whistleblower Joe Rannazzisi lays the blame for the opioid crisis squarely on the shoulders of the drug industry — especially the drug distributors — and Congress
Rather than taking proactive steps to curtail the opioid epidemic, industry lobbyists and Congress made it virtually impossible for DEA to take action against the top offenders and promoters of the epidemic by enacting the Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016
President Trump has reconfirmed his intention to declare opioid addiction a national emergency, thereby securing much-needed funds and policy initiatives to address the burgeoning epidemic
As of February 1, 2018, CVS Pharmacy will limit opioid prescriptions to a seven-day supply for certain health conditions. By doing so, CVS becomes the first pharmacy chain to restrict doctors’ ability to overprescribe the drugs
By Dr. Mercola
Opioid-related statistics reveal the U.S. has an enormous problem on its hands. Americans use 80 percent of all the opioids sold worldwide.1 In Alabama, which has the highest opioid prescription rate in the U.S., 143 prescriptions are written for every 100 people.2A result of this over-prescription trend is skyrocketing deaths from overdoses.3,4
As recently reported by CNN, the Manchester, New Hampshire, fire department responds to more calls for drug overdoses than fires these days.5 In 2015, 52,404 Americans died from drug overdoses; 33,091 of them involved an opioid and nearly one-third of them, 15,281, were by prescription.6,7,8
The following graph by the National Institute on Drug Abuse shows the progressive incline in overdose deaths related to opioid pain relievers between 2002 and 2015.9 This does not include deaths from heroin addiction, which we now know is a common side effect of getting hooked on these powerful prescription narcotics. In all, we’re looking at just over 202,600 deaths in this 13-year time frame alone.10
“The following piece was contributed by a New Zealander who interviewed a New Zealand health care worker who was prepared to share their observations of the effects of vaccination on staff and vulnerable patients.”
Health Care Provider Whistleblower: Vaccines Leading to Sickness, Days off Work and Death
“A little experience often upsets a lot of theory.” – S. Parkes Cadman
A New Zealand health care worker has witnessed vaccines causing harm and shares some observations in an interview conducted in mid-May, 2017. As ‘Corey’ (not real name) wishes to remain in employment, some details, including dates, locations and Corey’s gender, were omitted.
Corey worked at a rest home where residents were provided with hospital level care. The death rate was typically about five over the course of a year, but following the administration of flu shots, there was an unprecedented number within a four-week week period. Seven died within a month according to this concerned whistleblower.
Corey said the flu vaccines, which research has indicated are not only ineffective in the elderly, but immune suppressive, [1] were administered on the recommendation of a General Practitioner, (GP), who was working to Ministry of Health and World Health Organization immunization targets.
Offers Corey:
“The residents were aged between 78 and 90-years-of age and some of those who died had been in good health. Within about 10 days of receiving the vaccine, the first deaths started to happen. We lost three patients within in a few days of each other and then two more a few days after that. That’s five deaths within a little more than a week!”
“They had developed a cough in the first week, they went off food and their temperatures were raised. They had bacterial pneumonia and we had to give them antibiotics, but they still went on to die. It was not a natural death and the rest home could have been in serious trouble if residents’ family members found out that the vaccines had been given, as the GP responsible had not sought consent on behalf of those who were mentally unable to say ‘no’. It’s not written anywhere that a doctor has the right to make the decision to vaccinate.”
Check out The Truth About Gardasil website… (and remember Kiwis, there have been, sadly, three deaths already here in NZ) … please search for further articles on Gardasil by using the search box, ‘categories’ at left of page and/or go to the Gardasil page under ‘Vaccines’ at the main menu. With so many injuries and with the targeting of 9 year olds both boys and girls, you need to research this thoroughly for yourselves…
Since Gardasil’s introduction in 2006, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received more than 20,000 reports of adverse side effects reportedly related to Gardasil. These reports include serious adverse side effects including Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis, among others. There also have been 92 reported deaths among girls who received the Gardasil vaccine…. TheTruthAboutGardasil.com
A CDC report links cervical cancer vaccine, Gardasil, to incidents of fainting, blood clots, stroke and cardiac arrest.
Naturalhealth365) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is defined as the ‘unexplained death’ – usually during sleep – of an infant under a year old. And, although (conventionally speaking) many experts say the cause is ‘a combination of physical and sleep environmental factors,’ others blame this tragic event on the toxicity of vaccines.
The peak age for SIDS occurs at a time when infants are undergoing many vaccinations, giving rise to concerns that vaccines and SIDS may be linked. Of course – citing many studies – government health agencies deny this connection. But, there are still heartbreaking accounts that exist of SIDS occurring within hours or days of a vaccination.
As the controversy continues: cardiologist Thomas Levy, MD, JD points to vitamin C as a natural intervention that could potentially protect our children from a vaccine injury or premature death.
Gardasil, the HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccine on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) list of recommended inoculations for teenagers, has been the subject of debate worldwide since it was fast-tracked for approval in the US in 2006. The Merck-manufactured drug was developed to prevent infections caused by HPV, which is a group of 150 related viruses — 15 of which are linked to cervical cancer. At the heart of the controversies are questions around the need for the vaccine, the efficacy of the vaccine and the fast-growing number of reports of severe reactions to the vaccine. The latter question has moved to the forefront of the debate as safety testing concerns have been raised and the number of vaccine-injured children has grown.
Gardasil- A Case of Insufficient Testing?
Despite no recorded outbreak of cervical cancer nor change in sexual behavioral risks among teenagers, Gardasil vaccine was studied for less than two years prior to its approval. This was particularly curious since the cancer the vaccine purports to prevent does not present itself for 20-30 years.
And, while the drug was tested only on women aged 16-23 before it became the first licensed HPV vaccine in the United States, today it is recommended for boys and girls as young as 10 years old.
Moreover, Gardasil was not tested on people with health problems nor in combination with all the other vaccines routinely administered to American adolescents, such as Tdap and meningococcal vaccines.
Although the CDC claims that sufficient testing has been done, The National Vaccine Information Center discovered the opposite from independent research on the combination of Gardasil and Menactra (a meningococcal vaccine), if given on the same day. Respiratory problem reports increased by 114%, cardiac problems by 118%, neuromuscular and coordination problems by 234%, convulsions by 301%, and injuries caused by falls after unconsciousness shot up by 674%.
This clearly reflects how untrustworthy the establishment really is. To place people in charge of the safety of vaccines, who scored zero in the safety & approval of a product that continues to this day to cause birth defects is totally reprehensible. Read the damning evidence in the article below. They cut short the time for the safety trials & approved it anyway. This is how glyphosate in Roundup got approved, a short enough period to show no serious effects. Typically also the authorities have dragged their feet on this one. NZ vets only got acknowledgment of the damages caused by Agent Orange in around 2007. Disgraceful. All that suffering. See the birth defects suffered by innocent children. These people who inflict such careless damage should be held to account. EWR
When historians write about the Vaccine Decades (1976–2020), there are two names that will live in infamy: Dr. Frank DeStefano, and Dr. Coleen Boyle.
Why Are the Same People Who Failed at Science on Agent Orange in Charge of Vaccine Safety and Developmental Disorders at the CDC?
In the 1980s, Congress mandated Agent Orange studies. Frank and Coleen ended the studies two years early, insuring that “no link” would be found between illnesses being reported by injured veterans and dioxin. The early termination of the study allowed the US Department of Veterans Affairs to deny any connection between Agent Orange and medical problems, preventing veterans and their families from qualifying for compensations. Here’s your hurt, what’s your hurry. The Boyle/Destefano team bamboozle was outed by Admiral Zumwalt who went to the President and laid out the science in a classified report (now declassified):
“Without exception, the experts who reviewed the work of the Advisory Committee disagreed with its findings and further questioned the validity of the Advisory Committee’s review of studies on non — Hodgkin’s lymphomas .”
“a decision which should have been based on scientific data was reduced to vague impressions”
[One impartial review team’s results were] “a stunning indictment of the Advisory Committee’s scientific interpretation and policy judgments”
“1987 Followup Examination Results,” described statistically significant increases in health problems among Ranch Handers including all cancers”
“The work of the Veterans’ Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards, as documented in their November 2, 1989 transcript, has little or no scientific merit, and should not serve as a basis for compensation or regulatory decisions of any sort.”
“the Air Force could just as easily have concluded that the health problems associated with the Ranch Handers were not necessarily related to eating beer nuts.”
“Shamefully, the deception, fraud and political interference that has characterized government sponsored studies on the health effects of exposure to Agent Orange and/or dioxin has not escaped studies ostensibly conducted by independent reviewers, a factor that has only further compounded the erroneous conclusions reached by the government.”
The Zumwalt report concluded:
“It can, in my judgment, be concluded, with a very high degree of confidence, that it is at least as likely as not that the following are caused in humans by exposure to TCDD: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chloracne and other skin disorders, lip cancer, bone cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, birth defects, skin cancer, lung cancer, porphyria cutanea tarda and other liver disorders, Hodgkin’s disease, hematopoietic diseases, multiple myeloma, neurological defects and auto-immune diseases and disorders.
In addition, I am most comfortable in concluding that it is at least as likely as not that liver cancer, nasal/pharyngeal/esophageal cancers, leukemia, malignant melanoma, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, brain cancer, psychosocial effects, and gastrointestinal disease are service– connected..”
President Clinton called Admiral Zumwalt “the conscience of the US Navy”. In fact, Zumwalt’s report is used by veterans seeking compensation. Zumwalt’s son was exposed to Agent Orange and died of lymphoma in 1988.
Boyle and Destefano’s Role in Agent Orange Pseudoscience
The CDC study (which lists no authors) that was published did not study any specific mechanism by which Agent Orange might have caused health issues in veterans. Instead, it studied dioxin levels in Vietnam veterans compared to non-Vietnam veterans. The 646 Vietnam veterans studied by CDC who all served in units that were most likely exposed, did not have elevated levels of dioxin as compared to non-Vietnam veterans. This retrospective study seeking differences of levels of dioxin nearly two decades after exposure is a type of epidemiologic study with only a long shot at success. The aims of the study were to determine whether military records could be “used to identify US Army Vietnam veterans who were likely to be exposed to the herbicide Agent Orange”.
Dioxin is stored in fat. The study measured dioxin levels in serum. Given the CDC’s failure to detect evidence for increased exposed in the 1980s, the ill-posed study was initially used as justification for no further science on the possible effects of exposure.
The analysis and conclusions were also blasted by a Congressional Report:
What else has the Destefano/Boyle team failed to detect?
Under their watch, studies conducted ostensibly to test the hypothesis of a link between vaccines and autism have consistently failed to detect any association. Are they competent enough, given the debacle of their failed study in 1988, to run the hopefully entitled “Immunization Safety Office” (which ignores the differences between Vaccination and Immunization) and the “National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities”?
It is my professional opinion that no, neither of these individuals is sufficiently competent to be involved in vaccine safety science and interpretation of studies.
Further, it is my professional opinion that both are guilty of intentional and scientific fraud, perpetuated repeatedly and consistently, to hide the association between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.
(1) Boyle informed Congress that no studies have been conducted that compares the rates of autism in vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans. Yet the CDC website clearly reads “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”. How could any competent scientist make such as stunning conclusion when the science required to answer the question has not been conducted?
(2) Destefano removed results showing increased risk of autism from on-time MMR prior to presenting to the Institutes of Medicine, and prior to publishing the fraudulent study known as “Destefano et al., 2004”. Two subgroups are missing: African American boys, and isolated autism. The latter group had increased risk, included boys and girls from any race, who had no other conditions other than autism. That means “anyone”.
Dr. William Thompson confessed his role in allowing false reports to be published both in audio recordings to Dr. Brian Hooker, and in statements from his lawyers. He was put on leave after reporting his concerns to then CDC Director Julie Gerberding, who put him on suspension for breaking rank. Dr. Walter Orenstein is also implicated in the cover-ups. See vaxxedthemovie.com and youtube.com/watch?v=hlxdWfTLHH0
(3) Boyle personally attempted to reconfigure the study design of that same study in an attempt to make the association of on-time MMR and autism go away. The team played with study design after knowing the increased risk of autism had been found, which is not allowed in objective research. They worked very hard to attempt to make the association go away. They play games with birth certificates, and age-group definitions. Nothing worked. So they simply removed the results:
(4) DeStefano admitted to journalist Sharyl Attkisson that (a) they removed the results because they did not believe them, and (b) that vaccines may be responsible for autism in susceptible individuals (See Sharyl Attkisson’s capture and hear the confession to her here).
Dr. Frank DeStefano’s career exemplifies a list of failures to detect anything wrong with vaccines.
“I guess, that, that is a possibility,” said DeStefano. “It’s hard to predict who those children might be, but certainly, individual cases can be studied to look at those possibilities.”
(5) DeStefano has participated in other publications in which he outlines how association studies should be conducted. He says that covariates must be “corrected for”, and that finding covariates that cause associations between vaccination and adverse events to disappear after the association is first found and then lost due to such corrections somehow exonerates vaccines. This is poppycock. If birthweight, mother’s age, mother’s income, gestational age, etc. cause a loss of significance of vaccination status, the correct model selection procedure is to look for interactions between vaccines and the covariates — especially because they can be functionally related to adverse events from vaccines. If the interaction terms are significant (which could easily be, given that mother’s income, age, gestational age and birthweight may all correlate to nutritional status), the result is pointing to covariates that make vaccination an increased risk. This is elementary linear modeling, and any studies that “correct for” covariates without also studying, and reporting, the interaction terms is hiding the effects of vaccines interacting with other variables.
Besides Autism, what else has the CDC Destefano/Boyle team failed to detect? It is outlined in this 1990 Congressional Report: The Agent Orange Cover-up: A Case of Flawed Science and Political Manipulation.
Given these realities, and the fact that this and other equally damning information has been available for at least three years, it simply is unconscionable that Destefano and Boyle remain in their positions at the CDC. We cannot have incompetent individuals unable to conduct and properly interpret science standing in the way of helping America deal with the explosion of neurodevelopmental disorders — and the full suite of consequences currently being experienced in schools and homes all around the country.
Cowardice at CDC is Not Leadership with Accountability
These people are not only incompetent. They are cowards. Here, we learn from Dr. Thompson that Coleen Boyle refused to ever testify to Congress again. CDC abdicated its responsibility to accountability for their policies:
(recorded May 24, 2014) Page 25 —
Dr. Thompson: Well let me tell you something really interesting I learned about this week so in the midst of this. Ya know, I was yelling at Marshalyn this week, I mean, Marshalyn and I were . . . WHOOOO! I was, it was suggested I resign, and um it’s like that type of stuff going on right now. The whole place is a big pressure cooker . . . So I don’t know if you know this. The CDC was invited to testify (before Congress) and they declined, so this is . . .
Dr. Hooker:Really?
Dr. Thompson: Yeah, and Marshalyn said she’s been offered to testify and said she won’t. Coleen (Boyle) said she’s been offered to testify and Coleen said that she would never go and testify again.
May 20, 2014 — the hearing which Thompson is talking about and Boyle and CDC declined to attend:
The rate of ASDs is now 1 in 36. Frank, Coleen, you can stop the denialism. It’s over. And you can help America. How? Please resign, and in your letters of resignation, provide a full confession, like Dr. William Thompson has, and let someone capable try to clean up the mess you’ve made.
Vaccines can cause autism in some people, and, from the looks of things, in many people, and you know it. You failed to adjust the schedule, or offer meaningful public health advice in terms of vaccine safety. Your deeds are having profound effects on society, which are difficult to grasp:
Half of children have a mental illness in the US.
Teachers cannot teach children due to behavioral anomalies.
Violence in schools are causing special education teachers to quit in schools across the country.
Property taxes are going up as special education costs skyrocket.
Calm rooms are being built in schools, and wobble chairs to allow fidgeting.
Rates of schizophrenia are increasing among 20–30 year olds.
High levels of amyloid are found in the brains of kids with severe autism.
High levels of aluminum are found in people with autism.
Artificial immunization programs are failing as parents abandon them due to first-hand experience with neurological and immunological adverse events.
Exemptions to vaccine mandates are increasingly under fire.
There are desperate attempts ongoing now to convince the increasingly vaccine injured public that vaccine injuries are rare, to blame ASD on stress in the home, and most recently on alcohol use during pregnancy. Why now, all of sudden, can such association be detected? Where were these studies of environmental exposures conducted by CDC after 1988?
There were none. CDC (i.e., Boyle, Destefano) had a suspicious lack of curiosity of what DID cause autism. CDC convinced IOM to say that no more studies were needed.
Sound familiar?
CDC failed to detect association, and called for no more science. Just like Agent Orange.
Studies of genetics have revealed 850 genes associated with autism, but no single gene explains more than 1% of ASD. No studies have looked for genetic/vaccine interactions — and they must be conducted to fill in the gap. “No studies” does not mean “negative evidence.” It means “we need more science.”
The future is now. Vaccines can no longer be said to be “safe” and effective. Other science has progressed, independent of CDC, and the cat is out of the bag.
History will recall the names Destefano, Boyle, Orenstein, Gerberding — and Thompson. There are others. History has shown us that propaganda has never been successful in propping up a regime founded on fraud.
It’s time for Vaccine Safety Science Reform at the CDC, and across the United States.
First we need competence.
About the author:James Lyons-Weiler is the president and CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, an advocacy group that pushes for accuracy and integrity in science and for biomedical researchers to put people’s health before profits. An established academic and researcher, he has a bachelor’s degree in biology, a master’s degree in zoology, a PhD in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology, and a postdoctoral in computational molecular biology; and he’s the author of Ebola: An Evolving Story and Cures vs. Profits.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Updated 16/2/23. As @ this date we have concerns raised over the recent Turkey & Syria quakes. (Note also, the original link to the EQC research has now been located & updated. There is a pdf download at the link. Also added, more footage of blue lights here): EWR
…when Hillary Clinton and her team were notified that a 6.3 magnitude earthquake had just struck Christchurch, her team’s response was just three words…….“and on cue” https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/11791
By Kiwi4Justice, 22/02/2018
Who Knew It Was Coming And Why?
A report by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission adds to speculation and mysteries surrounding possible foreknowledge of the Christchurch earthquake in 2011
What really happened with the Christchurch earthquake which decimated the city in February 2011? Is there more to this disaster than many people realise? Did some people know it was coming? Or even worse?
Source: Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament, Christchurch
A study by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission Research Foundation looking at earthquake precursors and predictors in the ionosphere has added some intriguing new elements to the hypothesis that some people knew the Christchurch earthquake was coming. According to this new research, a number of earthquakes in New Zealand have been associated with measurable disturbances in the ionosphere in the days preceding the earthquakes, but that the Christchurch earthquake had a uniquely different and unexplained type of disturbance of the ionosphere.
Editor’s Note: should the EQC link lead to ‘page not found’ or similar (as it frequently has since updating this article) please go to the EQC home page at https://www.eqc.govt.nz (copy and paste the link) then search there for ‘Ionospheric earthquake precursors’. There is a pdf download at the page.
More on the interesting findings of this study shortly, but to help put some broader perspective on this issue let us first look at what are some extraordinary occurrences and coincidences surrounding the Christchurch earthquake which add to theories that high level US officials knew that the earthquake was about to strike. If so, how did they know this and why was it kept from the New Zealand public? Was the Christchurch earthquake even more sinister than a simple matter of foreknowledge by the US? Could it potentially have been triggered artificially, either accidentally or perhaps even deliberately?
On the day of the Christchurch earthquake the 2011 US-NZ Pacific Partnership Forum was being held in Christchurch with many high level representatives present from both the US and New Zealand, with meetings scheduled to go all day. Why did a number of delegates from US Congress who were at that forum suddenly cut and run for the airport at 10.00am, two hours before the earthquake struck, and relocate to Prime Minister John Key’s offices in Wellington?
Why did Thad Allen, a US government specialist in disaster rehabilitation and infrastructure rebuilding, and Tim Manning, Deputy Director of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), just by coincidence happen to be in Christchurch at the time of the earthquake and were able to take on a significant advisory role with the earthquake management response? This was in exactly the same way as the coincidence in Haiti whereby a group of US disaster response experts just happened to be in Haiti for disaster training exercises the day before and the day of the Haiti earthquake, and were then able to take control of the emergency response in 2010? An amazing set of coincidences. Why did Janet Napolitano, US Homeland Security Secretary, suddenly cancel her visit to Christchurch two days before the earthquake struck?
But perhaps of most interest, when Hillary Clinton and her team were notified by that a 6.3 magnitude earthquake had just struck Christchurch, her team’s response was just three words…….“and on cue”
Hillary Clinton and her husband, former US President Bill Clinton, also happen to have very significant links to the 2010 Haiti earthquake and the supposed infrastructure rebuilding through the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation is now under serious investigation for major fraud, including the ‘loss’ of many billions of dollars of Haiti disaster relief funds.
In a stunning coincidence, both the Haiti earthquake in 2010 and the Christchurch earthquake in 2011 both had major military training exercises in operation in the immediate vicinity, with that training being specifically for emergency response to a major disaster such as an earthquake. For the Christchurch earthquake, this included a massive military exercise taking place just outside of Christchurch with over 100 troops whose disaster response training suddenly went live as they were on hand to support the immediate earthquake response. The HMS Canterbury was conveniently parked at Lyttleton Harbour with emergency food supplies ready. This is remarkably similar to the situation in Haiti 2010.
Alongside this, on the afternoon of the earthquake, while a major national emergency was in full swing across New Zealand, why did Prime Minister John Key stop to sign over the seabed exploration rights for New Zealand, including the Canterbury Basin, to the giant oil mining company Anadarko just four hours after the earthquake struck? Shouldn’t he have had more important matters on his mind at that time? Some people estimate this agreement as being potentially worth trillions of dollars.
Anadarko just happened to have their seismic exploration boat, the Aquila Explorer, stationed off the coast of Christchurch at the time of the earthquake, which is a point that the New Zealand government have been very anxious to try to deny. More on that important point later, but is this related in any way to the fact that the Aquila Explorer possessed seismic technology which had HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) technology which can create a disturbance in the ionosphere potentially of the sort which has now been linked to the ionosphere anomaly shown in this new study by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission?
Speculation and theories regarding foreknowledge of the Christchurch earthquake are quite varied. The slightly less sinister theory is that certain people in the United States had the capability to read the natural earthquake precursors, and they were just taking precautionary measures. However, even if this were the case, it is still an extremely serious crime to not divulge this information to try to save lives. A similar case of that happening in Italy resulted in six scientists being charged with manslaughter, which was subsequently overturned seven years later.
Added to this theory is that perhaps the seismic technology on board the Aquila Explorer somehow acted to inadvertently impact the ionosphere which helped to trigger the earthquake. There is also a far more sinister theory that the Christchurch earthquake was what is referred to as a man-made ‘eco-terrorism’ strike by powerful Deep State forces for nefarious purposes. That theory may sound ridiculous, impossible, and crazy. But is it? The evidence to support this theory is considerable indeed.
How does a man-made earthquake work?
What is an ‘eco-terrorism earthquake’, and why would this potentially have been targeted on Christchurch in 2011? The US Deep State military and others have for many decades possessed the knowledge and the technology to trigger artificial earthquakes in specific locations.
“Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts.”
US Secretary of Defence, William Cohen, 1997
The technology to artificially trigger earthquakes was first discovered as far back as the early 19 hundreds by genius scientist Nikola Tesla, the inventor of remote control technology and the original brainchild of what is now wifi.
Tesla discovered the power of directed high frequency energy. That concept has since been evolved and harnessed by Deep State forces to be able to create a number of different large scale environmental impacts, including large scale weather modification and triggering artificial earthquakes. Triggering artificial earthquakes uses a similar method to how a crystal glass can be shattered by the high frequency sound waves of an opera singer. In the case of earthquakes, it is low frequency electromagnetic waves, rather than sound waves, that have the shattering effect deep underground.
An artist’s impression of the wireless Tesla world power system and Tesla’s “Electrical Experimenter” in 1919 (bottom right)
Nearly 100 years later and this is what Tesla’s technology now looks like. This is an SBX radar platform, of which there are a number travelling around the world owned by US defence giant Raytheon which have HAARP capabilities.
Dr Nick Bergich and Jeanne Manning provide some excellent explanations for how the HAARP technology works and its purposes in this exert http://haarp.net/ from their ground breaking book ‘Angels Don’t Play This HAARP – Advances in Tesla Technology’
The brief video clip below demonstrates how HAARP can be used to trigger an earthquake.
At a meeting of European Parliament in 1999, the uncertain but substantial military threats posed by HAARP weapons were a major part of the agenda. The following are a few exerts from the various motions put forward for discussion regarding HAARP at that meeting:
(European Parliament) Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its far reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;
On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(21)
HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter.
By manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own. Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep, to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities.
HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have.
HAARP is a project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.
We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.
So, it is clear that back in 1999 the European Parliament considered HAARP to be a real potential threat to the world and that the US were keen to try to keep this technology a secret as much as possible.
Over the past 15 years there have been claims of a number of major earthquakes having been man made. The Haiti earthquake in 2010 is probably the one that has received the most coverage, including then President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, stating that he believed the Haiti earthquake was caused by a ‘tectonic weapon’ of the US.
Note: if you have an alternative link to this video could you send it via the contact page? I was unable to find one.. EWNZ
There have also been theories and evidence put forward about the possible role of HAARP with the Fukushima earthquake in Japan in March 2011, shortly after the Christchurch earthquake. Like the Christchurch earthquake, NASA scientists have found anomalies with the ionosphere and electromagnetic pulses several days prior to the Fukushima earthquake which are consistent with HAARP technology.
So, if the theory about the Christchurch earthquake being an ‘eco-terrorism’ attack were correct, what could be the motive of that attack, how would it have been done, and who would have been involved or complicit? The standard three points of a crime scene investigation – Who, Why, and How, and what evidence is there to support the theory?
Method
Let’s start with the question of how. As just stated, artificial earthquakes can be triggered by using HAARP technology. The largest and most powerful HAARP station is located in Gakona, Alaska. HAARP technology can send several billion watts of electromagnetic energy into the ionosphere which can be used for a number of different purposes, including reflecting this electromagnetic energy back into the earth at specific frequencies to trigger an earthquake on an existing fault line.
Source: Red Ice; HAARP Creates Artificial Aurora, Lights Up The Sky
In order to use HAARP to trigger an artificial earthquake, radio waves are transmitted into the ionosphere at low frequency, specifically 2.5 Hz, which is the same frequency that is given off by an earthquake. This transmission of a specific earthquake inducing frequency is combined with seeding the lower level atmosphere with a large quantity of metallic nano-particles.
This process of atmospheric seeding allegedly enhances HAARP’s capabilities in transmitting and directing its energy when used in tomographic (ground penetrating) mode. If this is directed in the right way to an existing fault line then it can trigger an earthquake. According to HAARP scientists, for an artificial earthquake to be triggered in this way, the HAARP generated radio frequency would need to be focussed into the target area several days prior to the earthquake occurring, and this can be done from a HAARP station which is on a different part of the planet.
The seeding of the atmosphere with these nano-particles is done through a process of large scale stratospheric aerosol spraying, or stratospheric geo-engineering, using aircraft.
Source:Aerosol spraying from engines and wing tip nozzles
So the next question. Is there any evidence of HAARP technology being deployed in the days leading up to the Christchurch earthquake which could potentially be linked to the anomaly of the ionosphere found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission? Also, is there any evidence of the associated atmospheric spraying or geo-engineering that we can see above?
The activation of the HAARP installation in Gakona, Alaska is measured using their HAARP ‘Induction Magnetometer’. As shown in this graph below, the HAARP technology at Gakona was active for at least two days immediately prior to the Christchurch earthquake.
Source: Induction Magnetometer, Gakona HAARP Station
February 20-22, 2011
How does this graph correspond with the unusual ionosphere anomaly found for the Christchurch earthquake in the new study by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission? The study by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission looked at daily fluctuations in the ‘Total Electron Content’ (TEC) in the ionosphere in the days preceding a major earthquake to see if there were any patterns which could be used as earthquake precursors. The study looked at four major earthquakes in New Zealand, including Darfield 2010, Christchurch 2011, Seddon 2013, and Lake Grassmere 2013.
Below are the TEC ionosphere graphs for the days leading up to the Darfield and Lake Grassmere earthquakes.
TEC charts for Darfield and Lake Grassmere earthquakes
Compare this to the TEC ionosphere graph below prior to the Christchurch earthquake and we can see that there is something significantly different going on with the ionosphere for the Christchurch earthquake
TEC chart for Christchurch earthquake
February 18th, 2011
According to the NZ Earthquake Commission report, the chart shown here for Christchurch corresponds to the time of greatest anomaly in the ionosphere prior to the Christchurch earthquake. While the anomaly peaked on February 18th, it was spread over a number of days prior to the earthquake. The area of greatest anomaly, which ‘has two centres – about 150km north-east and south-east of Christchurch – includes Christchurch itself’. The report goes on to say ‘We have no explanation for the spatial distribution of the anomaly………the precursor time of three days and the concentration of spatial anomalies at locations not far from Christchurch suggest that the anomaly could be associated with the preparation process of the Christchurch earthquake’
So we have an unexplained anomaly in the ionosphere immediately preceding the Christchurch earthquake, which is different in characteristic to other major earthquakes that were studied in New Zealand. During the same time period, or extremely close to it, we have some significant activity in the HAARP Induction Magnetometer from the Gakona HAARP station which is a technology that is designed specifically to impact the ionosphere.
Unfortunately we do not have access to the Gakona HAARP chart for the days prior to February 20th to be able to fully cross check this with the ionosphere anomaly found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission. But we can certainly say that there was significant HAARP activity occurring from the Gakona HAARP station around the same time as the ionosphere anomaly found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission.
Do we have any other potential man made influences on the Christchurch ionosphere at the time of the earthquake?
The Birdlings Flat Research Station in Akaroa, just outside Christchurch bears remarkable similarities to the HAARP facility in Gakona, Alaska.
HAARP facility, Gakona Alaska The Birdlings Flat Research Station “operated much like a transistor radio but on a massive scale”. Pulses are sent up 60-120 kilometres into the atmosphere where they are mostly absorbed, and some of it is reflected back into the ground. While the Birdlings Flat Research Station was operated by the University of Canterbury, and was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Defence. Why would it be funded by the Ministry of Defence?
As well as the Birdlings Flat facility, 30km north of Christchurch in Eyrewell is the location of New Zealand’s only Ionosonde. This is a swept frequency vertical sounding radar and gives information on the electron density in the ionosphere. The Ionosonde is operated by the Physics & Astronomy Department of the University of Canterbury under a contract of the New Zealand Defence Force.
In addition to the Birdlings Flat facility, which looks extremely similar to a HAARP facility, the giant US defence contractor, Raytheon, had a base at Christchurch Airport at the time of the Christchurch earthquake. Raytheon is one of the largest defence technology companies in the world and specialises in advanced weaponry and homeland security. It has very strong links to HAARP technology, and its technology includes the mobile SBX radar platform shown earlier. Shortly after the Christchurch earthquake, the contract for this base shifted from Raytheon to Lockheed Martin. We also have Anadarko’s ship, the Aquila Explorer, just off the coast of Christchurch at the time of the earthquake which possessed a large radar dome with HAARP technology likely capable of influencing the nearby ionosphere, or at least supporting other HAARP technology.
Why was the New Zealand government so keen to try to cover up the fact that the Aquila Explorer was parked right outside Christchurch the day before and the day of the Christchurch earthquake? On February 8th 2013, the New Zealand government held a public meeting about seabed mining at the Takahanga Marae, Kaikoura, to address public concerns about the government’s plans for Anadarko to begin deep water drilling off the coast of Kaikoura. Multiple government officials attended that meeting, including Simon Bridges, the Minister for Energy. When asked about the location of the Aquila Explorer ship at the time of the Christchurch earthquake the government officials were visibly evasive on this question and eventually came back and said that it was in Wellington at the time. This is despite a written testimony from a crew member of the Aquila Explorer confirming it was actually off the coast of Christchurch at that time, and eye witness accounts to support this.
A little further south in New Zealand, near Invercargill, there is the Unwin Radar of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) international radar network. Was this facility also involved in some way at the time of the Christchurch earthquake? On February 21st 2011, one day before the earthquake, 107 Pilot Whales were found beached at Mason Bay on Stewart Island at the bottom of New Zealand’s South Island, very near the SuperDARN facility. It is thought by many scientists that high powered radio frequency technology can interfere with the sonar navigation systems of whales and dolphins which can cause strandings.
So we certainly have some interesting information regarding the potential for HAARP activity and potential man made anomalies with the ionosphere in the Christchurch area and nearby around the time of the earthquake that could be linked with the unexplained ionosphere anomaly which the New Zealand Earthquake Commission have now discovered.
As mentioned earlier, the second part of triggering an artificial earthquake is the seeding of the atmosphere with metallic nano-particles through atmospheric spraying operations commonly referred to as ‘chemtrails’, or more accurately referred to as ‘geo-engineering’ through stratospheric aerosol spraying by aircraft. In the period immediately leading up to the Christchurch earthquake there were reports of aircraft engaging in large scale stratospheric spraying activity around the Christchurch area.
This stratospheric aerosol spraying was not limited to just the period of time immediately preceding the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, and was not limited to just the Christchurch area. During 2010 and onwards the New Zealand government had been repeatedly challenged on the issue of aircraft engaging in large scale stratospheric aerosol spraying campaigns, in particular around the upper and middle parts of the South Island during 2010 and early 2011. The then mayor of Kaikoura, Kevin Heays, wrote several times about this to Dr Nick Smith, Minister for the Environment. In one letter to Dr Smith, Mayor Heays stated that I ‘have personally been observing what has been commonly termed as the formation of “chem-trails” throughout our sky’. Mayor Heays went on to say that what he was seeing ‘clearly indicated that normal passenger and freight air traffic was not responsible for this phenomena’
Dr Smith refused to personally respond to Mayor Heays about his concerns, however one of Dr Smith’s staff did respond to Mayor Heays to deny any awareness by the New Zealand government regarding stratospheric aerosol spraying. Here is an exert from Mayor Heay’s response to the New Zealand government on their denial of knowledge;
Your “unawareness” of any evidence to support any such thing as you have stated in paragraph 2 concerns me immensely. Evidence is indeed all over the world and on some major governmental agendas as we speak – including the British government and the US Congress. I respectfully suggest that if our government and their directors are indeed “unaware”, then a rapid and intense course be attended to become “aware”. You reasoning that my sightings and those of many others throughout our skies are…..”the result of normal air traffic” is, to be blunt, bollocks. The directions of these trails I refer to are not on the flight paths of domestic or international airlines, nor do we “top dress” over the Pacific Ocean.
In addition to this, in January 2011 every MP in New Zealand was written to in order to raise concerns about the then obvious programme of large scale stratospheric aerosol spraying in parts of New Zealand, including the Christchurch area. While this was also met with almost universal denial by the government, the then leader of the New Zealand Maori Party, the Hon Tariana Turia wrote this in response on February 2nd 2011, less than three weeks before the Christchurch earthquake.
I acknowledge your letter regarding atmospheric geo-engineering and chemtrails…….I appreciate your insights relating to this phenomena in so far as it informs our understanding of current and future environmental threats…….Our country needs patriots like yourself who are willing to fight the big fight against international giants.
It would seem then that there was considerable awareness and concern about stratospheric aerosol spraying in various parts of New Zealand in the months leading up to the Christchurch earthquake, as well as eye witness reports of large scale spraying activity specifically in the Christchurch area immediately leading up to the earthquake.
So in terms of evidence for how an artificial earthquake could have been triggered in Christchurch, we have an unexplained anomaly with the ionosphere found by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission which corresponds very closely with the HAARP Induction Magnetometer from Gakona around that time. We have what looks very much like a HAARP station at Birdlings Flat just outside of Christchurch which is funded by the Ministry of Defence, we have the Ionosade facility at Eyrewell, and we have Raytheon, an exotic weapons company strongly linked to HAARP technology based at Christchurch Airport. In addition, we have the HAARP capable Aquila Explorer sitting just off the coast of Christchurch at the time of the earthquake which the New Zealand government does not want the public to know about. We also have a huge amount of stratospheric ‘geo-engineering’ in the area at that time, which is a key ingredient for creating the necessary conditions for triggering an artificial earthquake, which the New Zealand government also does not seem to want the public to know about.
As an additional point, in this video we see John Key in a press conference accidentally call the Christchurch earthquake a man-made disaster. He did this not once but twice during this press conference.
Let us now move on to why someone might want to trigger an artificial earthquake in Christchurch. Follow the money is usually a very useful thing to do if a potential crime has been committed. Who has benefitted financially from the earthquake? Let’s take a look at several potential motives.
Firstly, the Christchurch rebuilding contracts and the privatisation of many public assets in Christchurch not only appears to be highly corrupt, but also enormously profitable for the New Zealand government and for certain large companies. The tendering process for rebuilding Christchurch was passed over to CERA (Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority) which is allegedly staffed entirely by employees of Fletchers. Fletchers then put in a bid (effectively to themselves) and was immediately awarded the contract the day it was submitted. The RBNZ (Reserve Bank of New Zealand) is by far the leading shareholder of Fletchers, with RBNZ owning 275 million shares and Fletchers themselves only owning 5000 shares. As the RBNZ is a State Owned Enterprise, the New Zealand government is effectively profiting from the Christchurch earthquake rebuild.
The open letter and freedom of information request below, written to Mr Brownlee in 2013, provides some useful insights into some of the processes at play here. In particular the 15 questions put to Mr Brownlee at the end of this letter.
In addition to what seems to be an extremely corrupt situation, the New Zealand government is also gaining enormously through the ‘Red Zone’ crown reclamation, whereby members of the public with houses in a Red Zone are being hit with compulsory government acquisition unless they agree to a settlement offer. Add into this mix the biggest transfer of public assets in New Zealand history as the local infrastructure assets of Christchurch were privatised.
This all adds up to gigantic amounts of wealth, many billions, flowing from the people and the city council of Christchurch to large corporations and the New Zealand government. This article explores in more detail the potential corruption and other possible agendas of the Christchurch rebuilding processes.
The Christchurch and Haiti earthquakes share many similarities. Massive profiting from what is termed ‘Disaster Capitalism’ is just one of the similarities. Just as the Christchurch disaster response strategies have been enormously lucrative for the companies involved and the New Zealand government, and have decimated the budget of the Christchurch City Council, the Clinton Foundation has taken in more than $14 billion through global fundraising for the Haiti earthquake, of which almost none has actually made it to the people of Haiti. In the video link below we see the then US President Barrack Obama, as well as George W Bush, and Bill Clinton line up in front of the world media to plead for money to support the Haiti earthquake victims. George W Bush’s comment is interesting eight years later in light of the major investigation and audit now being conducted into the missing billions donated to the Clinton Foundation for Haiti earthquake relief.
“The most effective way to help the people of Haiti is to contribute money. That money will go to organisations (the Clinton Foundation) who will be able to effectively spend it. A lot of people want to send blankets or water. Just send your cash” (George W Bush)
Bill Clinton had been appointed UN Special Envoy to Haiti just a few months before the devastating Haiti earthquake struck, an earthquake that seems to have benefited the Clinton’s to the tune of many billions of dollars as they were then in perfect position to lead the global fundraising drive.
Did Bill Clinton somehow know that there was a highly lucrative opportunity coming up in Haiti? If so, how did he know that? Eight years later Haiti is still completely devastated and has no funds for rebuilding, despite the world having donated more than $14 billion for this.
With Donald Trump defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential election, a major investigation and audit has now been launched into the alleged massive fraud of the Clinton Foundation.
With this in mind, one must ask the question as to whether Hillary Clinton’s team also sent the same “and on cue” e-mail when the Haiti earthquake struck. Especially when we know that Lieutenant General Ken Keen, who led the Haiti disaster response, was conveniently on hand in Haiti leading an emergency management training drill just as had happened with the Christchurch earthquake.
So, the Haiti and Christchurch earthquakes both appear to be potentially associated with massive ‘Disaster Capitalism’. Was that the only motive for the Christchurch earthquake or were other agendas involved as well?
A second motive may have been related to the highly controversial Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). Were the TPPA negotiations somehow linked to the Christchurch earthquake, and the subsequent Kaikoura earthquake just up the coast in 2016? A major agenda item of the US-NZ Pacific Partnership Forum being held in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake was the TPPA. The TPPA is a proposed 12 nation trade agreement, led by the United States, which has enormous potential consequences for the 12 nations involved, including potentially giving big trans-national corporations the ability to have a hugely controlling influence over government policy-making of those 12 nations in favour of enormous corporate profit.
The TPPA has been a highly controversial issue for New Zealand, including the major implications for the Treaty of Waitangi. In 2015 the TPPA resulted in the largest signed petition in New Zealand history being delivered to New Zealand parliament in protest at the governments continuing push to sign off the TPPA.
Source: Huge TPPA protests shut down Central Auckland
With the huge public protests and continuing questions raised that the TPPA was a breach of the Treaty of Waitangi, the New Zealand government had conceded that the TPPA was virtually dead in New Zealand. However, one day after the Kaikoura earthquake in November 2016, the New Zealand government suddenly ratified the TPPA and then completed the public signing off of it in February 2017.
When members of the US delegation in Christchurch in 2011 cut and ran for the airport just before the earthquake struck and relocated to John Key’s offices in Wellington, was the earthquake used as an eco-terrorism threat to the New Zealand government for them to be compliant towards the TPPA? Was the Kaikoura earthquake subsequently used as another eco-terrorism threat to force through the final ratification by the New Zealand government when the government had seemingly been overwhelmed by the massive public backlash against the TPPA?
Finally on possible motives for the Christchurch earthquake being an eco-terrorism event, we have oil. Perhaps the most significant and obvious motive was the enormous potential profit to be made from the New Zealand seabed drilling agreements. The sea beds surrounding New Zealand represent the 4th largest oil reserves in the world, which is why New Zealand is sometimes referred to as the ‘Texas of the South’. This map shows the current areas of seabed mining agreement which represent potentially trillions of dollars of oil reserves.
The signing off of those seabed agreements has been extremely controversial in New Zealand politics. Like the TPPA, it brings major complications with the Treaty of Waitangi, as well as large and very vocal environmental protest groups.
Source: A haka is performed at the Piha protest against deep sea oil drilling
Once again, was the earthquake used as an eco-terrorism threat when those members of US Congress left Christchurch and relocated to John Keys offices where he and then signed off the seabed exploration agreement with Anadarko?
Why was John Key and the New Zealand government so aggressive in their subsequent efforts to ensure Anadarko would be able to achieve their oil drilling aspirations in New Zealand despite Anadarko oil drilling clearly being a huge environmental risk for the country, and in the face of extreme public protest? The article below describes how Anadarko was closely linked with the catastrophic Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and that Anadarko was making inaccurate or fraudulent claims about its experience and track record with deep water oil drilling.
Why did John Key state in 2013 that “This government is very clear, we won’t let cowboys operate here in New Zealand”, but then go ahead and do the exact opposite with Anadarko? Why did Energy Minister Simon Bridges then also go on to try to prevent anti Anadarko protests by implementing legislation which can only be described as extremely fascist? This legislation stated that anyone who attempted to interfere with or disrupt offshore oil and mining operations of Anadarko would face jail or a $50,000 fine, with fines of $10,000 for individuals who come within 500m of ‘no go’ zones, and fines of $100,000 for organisations who support such actions.
Why was John Key and the New Zealand government taking such an extremist approach to ensuring that Anadarko achieved its oil drilling programmes?
Who
If you want to unleash an eco-terrorism strike on a target country for the purposes of oil profit, there would likely need to be some strong connections between those who could provide and deliver the technology/weaponry for that eco-terrorism strike and those who will subsequently be mining the oil. As a point to note, HAARP is jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, and DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency).
With that in mind, let’s have a look at some of the board members of Anadarko around the time of the Christchurch earthquake.
Paula Reynolds – Director of BAE, a defence contractor in advanced weapon systems, which has included building HAARP’s phase 2 upgrade. BAE had previously provided $35 million to HAARP research
Peter Geren – former secretary of the US Army and US Air Force (who jointly own HAARP)
General Kevin Chilton – previously Head of US Space Command and Head of US Strategic Air Command
Anadarko was certainly associated with some very high level, high tech military connections, and very closely linked with those who would be in control of HAARP technology if it was to be used as an eco-terrorism weapon. The Anadarko board in fact looks very much like a high level military board with very close HAARP links.
Adding to the Anadarko links, Gerry Brownlee was appointed by John Key to be the ‘Emergency Earthquake Relief Minister’ to lead on the earthquake response and rebuilding. Most likely under advisory support from Thad Allen and Tim Manning as the US professional experts. The special ‘emergency powers’ that Mr Brownlee was given certainly seemed to allow for some considerable levels of wealth and asset transfer, as previously outlined. But perhaps of most interest is that it was Gerry Brownlee who initiated the seismic exploration of the Canterbury Basin for oil and mineral reserves and he was instrumental in the initial luring of Anadarko to New Zealand. So Mr Brownlee has very close links to at least two of the possible motives outlined here. Another extraordinary coincidence.
Let us now turn our attention from Anadarko back to the large US delegation that was meeting in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake as part of the 2011 US-NZ Partnership Forum. Who was on the list of attendees that day?
Thad Allen – US disaster response expert, who just happened to be on site to take a key advisory role with the Christchurch disaster recovery process. What is Thad Allen’s background and do we see any connections that could be relevant here?
Thad Allen’s specialist field is disaster rehabilitation, resilience, and infrastructure and community rebuilding. He directed the US federal response to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and he was the National Incident Commander of the Unified Command for the Deep Water Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. In November 2011 Allen was named a Senior Vice President at Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH). BAH works for US intelligence agencies and the majority of its contracts are with the US government, including a major contract with the NSA (National Security Agency). In 2016 Hillary Clinton/Clinton Foundation was the largest recipient of contributions from Thad Allen’s BAH.
So, it is fair to say that Thad Allen is extremely well connected with some very powerful agencies and individuals, including the Clintons who have such strong links to the Haiti Earthquake and alleged massive ‘Disaster Capitalism’.
Richard Armitage – former US Deputy Secretary of State and coordinator of the response to 9/11. He was also the author of the major US political planning document ‘Project for a New American Century’ which involves the US taking a much stronger and more controlling military role around the world through the 21st century.
Tim Manning – US Deputy Director of FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency)
Kurt Campbell – US Assistant Secretary of State for the Pacific and East Asian Affairs
All of these four people have significant military backgrounds, and Armitage, Manning, and Campbell also have Navy backgrounds. The US Navy is the prime operator of HAARP. So we certainly had some very powerful people in Christchurch with strong military links and very high level involvement in disaster response and international relations.
The Verdict
What should we make of all of this? It is impossible to say with absolute certainty what happened with the Christchurch earthquake and why. However, we know that triggering a man-made eco-terrorism earthquake is very possible and has been acknowledged as such by the United States government and others. The various physical and anecdotal evidences, and the various people connections, and coincidences make it very difficult to dismiss the likelihood of some nefarious activity at a high level in some way. We have an extremely ‘militarised’ and strongly HAARP connected board of Anadarko, and some extremely interesting personnel connections between Anadarko and high level military and ‘exotic’ weaponry. We also have extremely high level US military and US Navy personnel within the US delegation in Christchurch on the day of the earthquake.
Did these very powerful individuals, and others, help to oversee a HAARP eco-terrorism strike on Christchurch in 2011? Did they then cut and run just before it struck, relocate to John Key’s office where he then signed over the New Zealand seabed exploration rights to Anadarko’s very highly connected, highly militarised, and strongly HAARP connected board? This was subsequently followed by the New Zealand government implementing extremely fascist legislation to ensure that Anadarko’s deep sea oil drilling was not disrupted in any way by the people of New Zealand. Did Thad Allen and Tim Manning take on a vital advisory role with the recovery and rebuilding process of Christchurch, along with Gerry Brownlee, so that it could be steered in the right manner for achieving massive profit to the right people through ‘Disaster Capitalism’ in a similar way as occurred in Haiti the year before? Were the Clinton’s involved in some way with this, with Hillary’s team responding “and on cue” when they heard the news? Did the Clinton’s benefit from the Christchurch earthquake in some way like they seemingly have done on a massive scale from the Haiti earthquake, or were there different channels of ‘Disaster Capitalism’ in play for Christchurch?
We know that the Christchurch earthquake has now been shown by the New Zealand Earthquake Commission to be linked with an unexplained anomaly of the ionosphere in the days preceding the earthquake. An anomaly that could potentially have been created through the use of HAARP technology, which is a vital part of implementing a man-made earthquake using Tesla type processes. We have the main HAARP installation in Gakona showing significant activity around the time corresponding to the ionosphere anomaly. We also have several HAARP-like installations operating just outside Christchurch and funded by the Ministry of Defence, and we have global weapons giant Raytheon based at Christchurch Airport which is strongly linked to HAARP. We also have Anadarko’s HAARP capable ship sitting off the coast of Christchurch at the time, which the New Zealand government have tried to cover up. In addition to this, we have evidence supporting the huge atmospheric geo-engineering aspect of a man-made earthquake.
We have the incredible coincidence of Thad Allen and Tim Manning being on hand to advise on the recovery operation just as happened with the Haiti earthquake in 2010, and finally, just as the seabed exploration agreement was signed over immediately after the Christchurch earthquake, we have the TPPA agreement being ratified the day after the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake, despite it having previously been virtually dead and buried.
Since the Christchurch earthquake in 2011, New Zealand has changed in an immeasurable way. Not only is the city still in turmoil and changed forever, but New Zealand’s relationship with the United States, and in particular big corporate interests and big military links, have been radically altered, as have some significant human rights legislation. New Zealand is now dominated by big international energy interests, irrespective of potential environmental impact, and irrespective of the Treaty of Waitangi. New Zealand legislation and human rights have become much more ‘militarised’ and much more towards what you would associate with a police state. This includes New Zealand’s inclusion as one the five partner nations in the ‘Five Eyes’ US global surveillance system, as confirmed by Edward Snowden.
So, does this point towards extremely powerful forces using eco-terrorism to help drive through hugely profitable corporate agreements and to change the political fabric of New Zealand? The final verdict will have to be left to the reader and I would very much encourage people to do more of their own research into this subject area and other related subject areas. There is a huge amount of factual and critically important information out there that our mainstream news will simply not inform us about.
On February 22nd 2011 New Zealand had its heart and soul pierced by a giant spear. Perhaps on that day New Zealand in some way lost its innocence in this world. No one would ever attack beautiful, peaceful New Zealand. But that is perhaps what did happen on that day, and perhaps on subsequent days after that as well. Unknown to many around the world, we unfortunately live in a world today where national governments do not determine how countries are run, and our mainstream media does not tell us the truth. We live in a world today where covert, unaccountable, and immensely powerful forces (the ‘Military Industrial Complex’) control what countries do, and they instruct our media on what to tell us to think.
With that message in mind, I finish this article with a 5 minute audio clip below of a great and courageous speech by John K Kennedy in 1961. Perhaps one of the most significant political speeches ever made. It came after his predecessor, President Eisenhower, warned the world in his farewell Presidential speech in 1960, and then presumably gave President Kennedy a full briefing, about the imminent danger to the world of the rise of what he labelled the ‘Military Industrial Complex’. In President Kennedy’s 1961 speech, he tried to warn the world about exactly this, and he courageously tried to do something about it. A few decades later and many more people around the world are now aware of what Presidents Kennedy and Eisenhower both warned us about back then. That is a great piece of hope for the world.
Rest in peace the victims of the Christchurch earthquake, and may the people of New Zealand find the awareness and the courage to fight the global forces that are taking control of this amazing country.
Acknowledgements
New Zealand owes a huge debt of gratitude to the brilliant, resilient, and courageous people at The ConTrail www.thecontrail.com. Their refusal to let this issue go, and their tenacity in seeking the truth and bringing the evidence forward has been incredible.
Huge thanks to NZ Uncensored Magazine www.uncensored.co.nz who ran a number of articles immediately after the Christchurch earthquake bringing forward vital evidence around suspicious circumstances, and who also recently published the new evidence that has come from the New Zealand Earthquake Commission
Thank you also to world renowned researcher and author Elana Freeland and her pioneering work in the area of HAARP and Geoengineering. Her Book Under an Ionised Sky can be found here.
Sharing rights This article is free to be copied or distributed in whole or part, but may not be altered or modified in any way. Please use Source Links to article.
“One study in 2013 followed 34 monitored Kea in a poison-drop area. Five of them were found dead after the drop, and analysis confirmed 1080 as the cause of death. That’s a mortality rate of nearly 15%…
… nowhere in the article was there mention of the Kea’s significant risk to 1080 poison…”
One instance when silence is not golden …
A letter to the editor of the Dominion Post points out quite clearly here that mainstream media is guilty of omitting the blatantly obvious in their reporting… misleading the public perception of the reality of 1080 poison. If you care to examine the research on 1080 (the independent research, not that of those who justify 1080 use) you will find some serious holes with some serious leakage.
I’ve been reluctant to post on this topic, with all respect & condolences to all affected by this terrible event. Reluctant because so much is being said & it takes time to weed things out and get the true picture, knowing as we do that mainstream cannot be wholly trusted to give us all aspects. Who better to hear from than a person right on the ground. This man (Peaky Saku) is a local and spoke up in one of the very first interviews by MS. He’s interviewed in depth here & has much to say. To those who’ve observed what has been changing around us since the switch to neo-lib economics and all the so called ‘austerity measures’ from the late ’80s, particularly the end results we’ve seen more recently, you will recognize similar background events playing out in your own communities. Property development is a big player with the public private partnerships that the interview highlights. Profits ahead of people basically. Poor people don’t matter. An excellent watch and more to come. This is Agenda 21 (UN plans for global governance, see our related pages). EnvirowatchRangitikei
If you think that your government wouldn’t do this to you, think again. This info was broadcast by BBC but is no longer in their archives. It is clear evidence your government would do this and you likely thought it belongs in that handy ‘conspiracy’ category. There’ve been a lot of events gone into the ‘conspiracy’ basket of late … or is that the ‘too hard’ basket? OI requests obtained this information that sections of UK’s population were sprayed with zinc cadmium sulphide without testing the toxicity of the substance, and without the public’s knowledge. (This took place from Porton Down, “a military science park. It is situated slightly northeast of Porton near Salisbury, in Wiltshire, England…On maps, the land surrounding the complex is identified as a “Danger Area”.)[1] In light of this, don’t disregard the fact that we are all still being sprayed with unknown (& known) chemicals, even in ‘clean green’ Enzed. All officially denied of course. See our Geoengineering pages. EnvirowatchRangitikei
Uploaded on Feb 19, 2010
This is a shortened version of the BBC Inside out documentary series that was first broadcast on 6th November 2006. Its interesting to note that this broadcast can no longer by found in the BBC archives, which I think is actually a breach of their own charter.
Between 1953 and 1964 top secret trials were carried out using a chemical concoction of zinc cadmium sulphide to simulate how a cloud would disperse biological agents. The unsuspecting population in the East of England was sprayed covertly with the poisonous compound.
Death Rate continues to rise in both US and Europe
Last nights news on Gardasil – a Merck & Co vaccination for girls as young as 9 revealed the side affects of this vaccination for cervical cancer. The side affects they said were minor when studied seriously – sore arms, that’s to be expected the female spokesperson said. She obviously failed to do her research properly as thousands of women now suffer not from a sore arm, but from a paralysis of their arm and in some cases their legs as well.
TV One news also failed to mention the 15 deaths – in fact they never mentioned any deaths, not the 15 in America or the 2 in Europe, although they did mention the organisation that exposed the deaths focusing only side affects while omitting the deaths.
The European Medicines Agency posted a statement yesterday saying there have been two sudden and unexpected deaths in young women who had received the Merck HPV vaccine, which is marketed in Europe by Sanofi-Aventis. But the EMEA decided not to change the labeling info, given that 1.5 million women have already been vaccinated in Europe and because no causal relationship between the vaccine and the two fatalities has been found.
The spin merchants are quickly manipulating the situation. Merck has already been found guilty of killing hundreds with their Vioxx and Fosamax drugs see article here and reported side affects here here
Will Gardasil be the third given that the company boasted that Gardasil was almost side affect free ?
Death is an inconvenient obstacle to sales – don’t be fooled, a causal relationship can be found
TV one also failed to note that Merck’s shares had dropped 8% on Wall Street
and that there are now law suits pending over the paralyzing side affects attributed to Gardasil that TV One News chose to play down
TV One News did say however, that Gardasil would not be banned here unless the US banned it first – which begs the question – is NZ not able to make its own decisions based on the precautionary principal?
An abundance of first hand evidence is now available which disputes the safely of this vaccination – in light of this should NZ not err on the side of caution given that the research on the long term affects of this drug over time has never been done?
It is recommended that this vaccination NOT be given with other vaccinations – but that was never mentioned on TV one News either.
Questions arise such as – are we witness to our politicians representing a pharmaceutical interests over the better judgment of parents who have taken the time to get behind the hype, the fear and the politics and who are now having to protect their young girls and soon, boys from a drug whose effects on reproductive health is not known
Given that this vaccination has resulted in still births and miscarriage are we willing to jeopardize young girls reproductive health in order to save them from something they may or may not get when they get older?
The risks of this Merck drug far outweighs any potential cancer risk – where are the voices protecting our young girls?
Clearly the MOH advocates are not, nor is the government acting in parents and chidlrens best interests – and lets get real here – these are the same organizations that failed to act on the thalidomide scam the continuing Dow chemical scam the cervical cancer scam of the 80’s and the birth defects caused by Agent orange and more.
For more info and links to docos see our Vaccine pages (remember the sub pages). Educate yourself and make informed decisions from all the data, not just what mainstream feed you. If you’re on Facebook follow us there or here at our site & keep yourself informed.
Something to be very concerned about here. The number of deaths 144? Permanent injuries 6248? That’s a very high risk to take isn’t it? Do explore Youtube and watch the very many vaccine injuries recorded there by victims of Gardasil. If you can bear to watch that is. Some of those testimonies are very disturbing. Young teenage women in wheelchairs or bedridden, their normal active lives gone forever. Research this very carefully before submitting your child to this vaccine. And educate them yourself on the risks in the event it is ever offered without your knowledge or consent. That is not far fetched in terms of credibility. France (post to come) is currently considering mandatory vaccination. Stay informed and prepared.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
6248 Permanent Injuries and 144 Deaths Following Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Coincidence or Scandal?
As of November 2013 there have been 31,741 adverse effects, including 6248 permanent injuries and 144 deaths recorded following Gardasil vaccines. Pharmaceutical companies which make the vaccine, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services which holds patents and earns profits from the vaccine, say that they are all a coincidence. The mainstream media is even worse: they are in denial that these events are even happening.
Watch the video above and listen to the stories of girls who have become disabled and died, and ask yourself why their stories are not being told, and why the mainstream media is trying to censor them as much as possible.
As of November 2013 there have been 31,741 reported adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine, and the position of the Pharmaceutical companies which make the vaccine, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services which holds patents and profits on the vaccine, is that they are all a coincidence.
Call your Congressman and tell them you want an investigation into the HPV vaccine and the damage it is causing to young men and women.
“Not a Coincidence” is a campaign started by The Canary Party to address the medical community’s repeated excuse that the symptoms, too many experience, after vaccination are just coincidental. Seizures, fainting, rashes, allergies, GI dysfunction, loss of speech, etc, etc all labeled a coincidence. It’s time to end the excuses and start to listen to the injured and the parents of the injured. They deserve a forum to be heard, they deserve a voice, respect, attention, hearings and answers. They need a medical discovery process that uses their symptoms and their progression of illness in the process of finding treatments. All injured are worthy of being treated individually instead of disregarding their many medical maladies because of a vaccination program that is not allowed to be questioned. It’s time for the government, the medical community and the media to start taking into account the too many that are affected. Please take the time to hear from these beautiful, well-spoken girls and Moms tell their stories of injury after Gardasil.
See our Vaccine pages for more info & links, search categories for further Vaccine articles or use the search box. Sign up here for emails or if you’re on FB follow our page for updates. Use the share buttons to expose lies & spread the truth.
UPDATE 2/11/23 – Videos now gone from YT have been replaced with Bitchute ones. The first one below is part one to a series of 4. You can find the other three at this link.
(Note the original video posted on this item is now gone from Youtube, however there are many more if you search the Doctor’s name there. I’ve selected another below. The shorter one further down is a good listen if you haven’t time.
The pharmaceutical industry is now turning its attention to children said this Big Pharma whistle blower, because the baby boomers are dying out. This is why the upsurge in children’s ‘diseases’ and ‘disorders’ he said. This is a must watch video featuring the late Dr. John Rengen Virapen who also wrote books on the pharmaceutical industry (link to free ebook dowload below). He quite frankly confesses his own corruption within a system that paid him well. He was a young coloured doctor he says, in an industry that gave him a job, a good job. He went with their protocols for many years then spoke out, preferring to not technically be called a whistle blower as whistle blowers he said, are paid and he wasn’t. Big Pharma he said is in bed with the politicians, no surprises there, however he also names prominent US government officials who have also been top level management of the most prominent pharmaceutical industries. He also explains that they are told never to discuss side effects! Rather they have instructions to focus on the benefits of whatever pharmaceutical is being prescribed.
Another physician during Q and A cites the intention of the US Government to eventually screen every person including unborn children, for mental illnesses, followed by mandatory treatment for the same. I saw today, headlines suggesting a return to electric shock treatment (ECT) by psychiatrists. Some dot joining here.
Here is a link to Dr Virapen’s book, ‘Side Effects: Death’ – (you can have a sample look inside at Amazon).
Further evidence from the Graf Boys’ channel from 2012. Educate yourself. Watch their Poisoning Paradise doco. Share their videos and let the world know how cruelly these animals die and how clean and green we aren’t.
Taihape sheep farmer – Allan Westerman – was looking for lost sheep after an aerial 1080 poison drop on the back of his property. What he found is disturbing. This is the same issue the SPCA spoke out against last week. A total of 10 poisoned deer were found, and it’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Every New Zealander should see how the Department of Conservation treat our wild animals. Please spread this info far and wide.
If you are new to NZ’s 1080 poisoning program here is a good article to start with …
A must watch also is Poisoning Paradise, the doco made by the GrafBoys (banned from screening on NZ TV, yet a 4x international award winner). Their website is tv-wild.com. Their doco is a very comprehensive overview with the independent science to illustrate the question marks that remain over the use of this poison.
Disturbing information here regarding the goings on within the medical profession. My own contacts within the nursing profession, experiences of friends and family, and recent revelations like those in this article have lead me to believe we need to exercise extreme vigilance concerning our loved ones’ treatment within our medical system. I recall errors in my elderly parents’ medications, errors by Doctors, hospitals and pharmacies. Then also of concern is the Liverpool Care Pathway introduced in the UK and presumably no longer practiced, however I’ve seen evidence of it here in NZ. Nil by mouth to dying patients. No liquids. And often with neither the knowledge nor consent of the family….
“A study published in the prominent medical journal BMJ concluded that errors by doctors and hospitals kill more than 250,000 people a year in the U.S. That’s more than strokes, respiratory disease, and Alzheimer’s.
Martin Makary, a professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who led the research, said in an interview that the category includes everything from bad doctors to more systemic issues such as communication breakdowns when patients are handed off from one department to another.
“It boils down to people dying from the care that they receive rather than the disease for which they are seeking care,” Makary said.
The issue of patient safety has been a hot topic in recent years, but it wasn’t always that way. In 1999, an Institute of Medicine (IOM) report calling preventable medical errors an “epidemic” shocked the medical establishment and led to significant debate about what could be done.
The IOM, based on one study, estimated deaths because of medical errors as high as 98,000 a year. Makary’s research involves a more comprehensive analysis of four large studies, including ones by the Health and Human Services Department’s Office of the Inspector General and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that took place between 2000 to 2008. His calculation of 251,000 deaths equates to nearly 700 deaths a day — about 9.5 percent of all deaths annually in the United States.
Makary said he and co-author Michael Daniel, also from Johns Hopkins, conducted the analysis to shed more light on a problem that many hospitals and health care facilities try to avoid talking about.
All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.
It is critical that you take the initiative to confirm the information contained in this presentation.
For a library of additional links, books, articles and related information please visithttp://www.HowardNema.com
Find your own truth.
There is only one truth.
Seek and you will find it.
Heart disease is the first cause of death, according to this article from Paul A Phillips at sott.net. Cancer is the second cause, no surprises there. However the third cause is, believe it or not, medical error! In the U.S. 210,000 people die per year from medical mistakes.
As I regularly point out here, our medical industry if you like, has lost its desire to promote health by prevention as there is more money to be made from chemical, pharmaceutical ‘cures’ … that ultimately treat symptoms not causes. This decline of affairs began back in the early nineteenth century when the Rockefeller fraternity if you like, realized there was big money to be made from pharmaceuticals … and set about destroying natural cures. The powers that be are still in the business of suppressing the same, including dispensing with natural, holistic practitioners.
This is all a huge degeneration from the once practiced Hippocratic oath (see pdf pp 153-155) of Medical Doctors (“…I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure…” a part quote, note) . It is an era when we need more and more to be proactive about our own health. Gone are the days when the family GP was perceived as being up there with God himself. Read, research and protect yourself from medical misadventure. Read the article and particularly watch the video by Dr Mercola who will provide you with all the statistics to prove the veracity of these claims (note the video is also within the article).
In the USA alone it has been estimated that at least 210,000 patients died from medical mistakes in a year making this the third leading cause of death while heart disease is the first and cancer comes second.
Can the above figure be used to expose the corruption in medicine?
The reason why it has taken so long to realise that something is not right and why so many still don’t see that anything is going on can be explained like this:
On the whole, people: healthcare workers or patients or the public at large, can regard many circumstances in medicine as isolated cause and effect relationships. In other words, people generally fail to make the connections between the different cause and effect relationships.
DOC has received $3.5 billion of taxpayer’s money in the past decade, and not a single endangered bird species is in recovery on mainland NZ. And they have another significant drop planned for 2016.
From Bill Wallace at stuff.co.nz
“DOC is currently preparing the New Zealand public for another massive aerial 1080 poisoning of our forests in winter 2016, supposedly in response to yet another beech mast.
Masts or good flowering years of beech trees and other native plants are normal sporadic events. Some native birds only breed in mast years, it’s the way of nature, fluctuations of populations in response to food supply and environmental conditions. The same natural fluctuations occur with introduced species.
Last year’s Battle for the Birds poisoned an area the size of Taranaki supposedly in response to a beech mast and rat plague. The beech mast was light to moderate in most areas, and rat numbers in high altitude areas were at zero at the time of the 1080 drop in many areas. 1080 is a cruel inhumane poison that effectively chemically strangles it’s victims to death over many hours for the birds or days for large mammals.”
“Aerial 1080 randomly scattered over vast areas of our bush and mountains, often in breach of DOC’s own scientist’s advice and Standards, is the “dirtiest and cruellest” pretence at Conservation amongst developed nations (personal observation).”
Our supposedly ‘clean green’ country (and don’t get me wrong, I love my country) is sold to the world as being GE/GMO free. I’ve been repeating this often on here that we are not. (Read a quote from the Green Party on GE animal feed). Back in 2000 Nicky Hager wrote in his book ‘Seeds of Distrust’ that GE Corn was grown here in several different locations, without the public’s knowledge and obviously without their consent. Once uncovered, the PM at the time,
PM Helen Clarke initially ordered the GE corn be pulled up … then did an about turn (‘Seeds of Distrust’ by Nicky Hager)
Helen Clarke ordered the crops be pulled up and disposed of, however after some discussion and clearly corporate persuasion, the crops were left in and went to full term and harvest. How many other organic or otherwise crops were contaminated? Who knows given the industry is inclined to secrecy and an aversion to labeling of anything containing their poisonous products? As a result of all this the bar of acceptance levels was raised a little higher, widening the previously thin end of the wedge so to speak. It’s happening by increments folks. So here now we are being told of a 15 year excursion into biological experiments on genetically modified/engineered (whatever you like to call tinkering with nature) cows … and note, with ‘disastrous results’.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
Read the article here, from Sustainable Pulse:
NZ Cows are fed GE stock feed
“GE Free NZ ‘s report on “GE Animals in New Zealand: the first fifteen years, 2000 – 2015”, documents the world’s first field trials of genetically modified cows, bred to express one of six transgenic protein traits in milk for use as bio-pharmaceutical products. Agresearch has conducted the research at their Ruakura facility in Hamilton.
Using AgResearch’s own records, the report catalogues a sad and profoundly disturbing story that has characterised the genetic engineering (GE) trials.
The surrogate and transgenic cows suffer from chronic illness, reproductive losses, sudden unexplained deaths, and severe deformities.
In the course of fifteen years of experimentation, many thousands of transgenic embryos, predominately developed offshore in private partnership laboratories, have been used…”
“Omission and selective reporting of important experimental data to the media has enabled AgResearch to avoid scrutiny into the tragic results of using animals as bioreactors.”
On ‘The Dangers of Willful Blindness’ …. “Gayla Benefield was just doing her job — until she uncovered an awful secret about her hometown that meant its mortality rate was 80 times higher than anywhere else in the U.S.
But when she tried to tell people about it, she learned an even more shocking truth: People didn’t want to know. In a talk that’s part history lesson, part call-to-action, Margaret Heffernan demonstrates the danger of “willful blindness” and praises ordinary people like Benefield who are willing to speak up. (Filmed at TEDxDanubia.)” TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more. Find closed captions and translated subtitles in many languages at http://www.ted.com/translate
Here’s an illustration of what one person’s research into hidden environmental hazards can turn up. You would think people would be pleased to be warned however not so. In this instance nobody wanted to hear why their town’s death rate was 80 times higher than anywhere else in the US. I encounter similar disbelief when I relate the hidden dangers of Smart Meters and other RF radiation risks, and chemicals in our food, water and air. Too often people only begin to take this all seriously when bad health strikes. We need to remember again, corporations are about profits for their shareholders and these come first. Any environmental risks are only disclosed (if at all) in very fine print which few read. Corporations are not devoted to the good health of their buying customers … we the people need to fulfill that mandate. Be warned.
From Ty Bollinger of GreenMedinfo at The Truth About Cancer website:
“Not the scientific and medical terms used to describe the disease but general knowledge about the #2 killer in the United States. It’s incredible that there is so much information online about cancer – available with a few simple keystrokes – but how much do you really know?
There are so many forms of cancer, every patient case is unique, and you will never know everything (though that would be fantastic). It can be overwhelming….
Researchers worldwide agree that at least half of all cancers and cancer-related deaths are preventable. In 2015, an estimated 1.6 million deaths will be attributed to cancer – saving half with prevention is an excellent place to start.
Cancer is the single name assigned to more than 100 diseases. Though cancer was once referred to as a “wasting disease,” it is actually the result of abnormal cells that multiply and spread out of control to various points in your body, damaging healthy cells along the way. Most types of cancer result in tumors but cancers that affect the blood do not…”
efficacy of the vaccine and the fast-growing number of reports of severe reactions to the vaccine. The latter question has moved to the forefront of the debate as safety testing concerns have been raised and the number of vaccine-injured children has grown.
“It can, in my judgment, be concluded, with a very high degree of confidence, that it is at least as likely as not that the following are caused in humans by exposure to TCDD: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chloracne and other skin disorders, lip cancer, bone cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, birth defects, skin cancer, lung cancer, porphyria cutanea tarda and other liver disorders, Hodgkin’s disease, hematopoietic diseases, multiple myeloma, neurological defects and auto-immune diseases and disorders.
Dr. Frank DeStefano’s career exemplifies a list of failures to detect anything wrong with vaccines.
HAARP facility, Gakona Alaska
You must be logged in to post a comment.