From Stew Peters @ Rumble
Dr. William Makis joins Stew to discuss how Canada is now offering assisted suicide to victims of the safe and effective !
The world needs to know the truth that fake history has concealed. WATCH Old World Order, and find out more at: https://stewpeters.com/owo/
VIDEO AT THIS LINK
See also:
Facts Everyone Should Know about Euthanasia
Further articles on euthanasia HERE
NOTE: They do intend to infect you one way or another. Watch all injectables. EWNZ
From Exposing the Darkness @ substack
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT: Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines”
They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES. Kamala Harris Administration has been using US Tax Payer money to fund the development.
Rep. Thomas Massie: “…Does the term ‘Transgenic Edible Vaccines’ sound far-fetched? Well, it’s not. We are funding it. In fact scientists from the University of California, Riverside funded with your tax payer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a Transgenic Edible Vaccine…I don’t think this is a good idea. I don’t think the American people should be funding this…”
Click on the link HERE for the video
Image by Diana Cherry from Pixabay
Analysis: ACT’s bill can be seen as the culmination of moves over several decades by the Crown to use Treaty principles to rewrite te Tiriti and justify its own power, writes Jane Kelsey.
Analysis: ACT Party leader David Seymour has said the goal of his Treaty Principles Bill is to stimulate an overdue conversation on te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi. At that level at least he has succeeded.
His proposal to rewrite te Tiriti through new legislation has certainly triggered debate – to the point where the most profound constitutional question of all has been asked on the floor of parliament: did Māori cede sovereignty when they signed te Tiriti in 1840?
But the debate has also exposed deep ignorance, among political leaders and many others, about te Tiriti and the more recent concept of Treaty “principles”.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon fell back on Governor Hobson’s unilateral proclamations of sovereignty in 1840, which relied on what Māori scholar Margaret Mutu calls “the English draft of Hobson’s that Māori never agreed to”.
Meanwhile, Labour leader Chris Hipkins accepts there was no Māori cession of sovereignty, but that somehow the Crown has sovereignty now.
Beyond parliament, inflammatory and easily discredited disinformation about te Tiriti has circulated widely, backed by those who also advocate for the Treaty Principles Bill and its aim to cement into law a fundamental rewriting of te Tiriti.
READ AT THE LINK
RELATED:
Treaty bill plays on ignorance
Photo Credit: By Archives New Zealand from New Zealand – Reconstruction of the Signing of the Treaty of Waitangi, Marcus King, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51249748
by Connie Buchanan @ E-TANGATA
A very familiar modus operandi that became more glaringly obvious during and after 2020. EWNZ
Giving an apology on behalf of the state is tricky business. Here’s Connie Buchanan with a summary of how to do the bare minimum.
Stay in your own house. Be where you make the rules and feel most at ease. Where there’s plenty of room for you, but limited space for others.
Invite a mere handful of the thousands of survivors who are owed the apology. Put these few in another room of your house. Give them time to respond to the apology that you haven’t yet delivered. Five minutes each. Do not, yourself, go and sit in that room. It was bad enough having to read their horrible stories in the very long report.
While they are responding to the things you haven’t said yet, get ready to deliver the apology. Wear your normal suit like it’s a normal work day. Stand in your normal spot, surrounded by your normal crew. When you’re ready, bring them in from the other room. Make them be quiet. Make them listen. Make them obey the rules of your house. Keep the rest of the thousands at bay on a one-way live stream.
READ MORE AT THE LINK
Folk may recall an issue around the time of the experimental injection rollout that many of the injected found their injection sites were magnetic. (See here also). All quickly dismissed as ‘conspiracy theory’ the usual go-to of those who would hide the truth from you.
Anyway I also recall the magnetism noted in supermarket meat. So reading posts like this one from Exposing the Darkness @ Substack comes as no surprise at all. (What does suprise us these days?) So… Canada’s already injecting their pigs and shrimps… (note the US has been injecting pigs with DNA & RNA since 2017) … what else aren’t they telling us?
While Canada and now also NSW Australia are injecting mRNA into their livestock, Carter County Meats in Montana has taken a stand that they will not be coerced into injecting mRNA gene therapy into their livestock.
U.S. Democrats VOTED DOWN a bill that would have forced all meat products to clearly be labeled if injected mRNA vaccines. DNA and RNA have been in vaccines for pigs in the U.S. since 2017.
I’m adding a related post (in terms of what ‘they’ are doing to the animals) from a NZ writer at substack, Ursula Edgington. Her stack is called Informed Heart. Ursula has noted the application of IOB to the animals. They are (not so) cleverly moved around the paddocks with the use of electronic ‘nudges’….
Famously, Harari wrote about the Internet of Things and how humans are now “hackable animals”. And in The Internet of Bodies is Here (2000) – a report published by (who else?) the World Economic Forum – the authors warn us that:
Recent technological advancements have ushered in a new era of the “internet of bodies” (IoB), with an unprecedented number of connected devices and sensors being affixed to or even implanted and ingested into the [human] body.
Eeeek! No thanks. But it was part of NASA’s Internet of Animals, more specifically cows, that first ‘benefitted’ from the 5G technology in the UK. In New Zealand, the dairy sector contributes $billions to the economy and is one of its most dominant goods export sectors (e.g. China). So it made sense that NZ would be early adopters of a tech that nudges, pings and shocks cows to respond in certain ways to improve output.
5G, AI & Cows: NZ’s Internet of Animals
Header Image with thanks, by StockSnap from Pixabay
This is referring to hospitals in the US and their consent forms. Still in my opinion worth noting going forwards, remembering the sway of big pharma upon all things medical. And given we followed that nation’s protocols if you like during the 4 year plandemic. A nurse is speaking out here about the term ‘Biogenics’ being added into consent forms you will be asked to sign. Turns out that agreeing to the term ‘Biogenics’ means your consent includes any vaccine or other treatment they consider necessary for you, even when you are not conscious enough to know. In which case, according to the nurse, you could well receive a flu shot for instance (as others have discovered) whilst you are under anesthetic. You must therefore add to the form and sign any wish you may have to not receive any particular treatment.
Listen to the nurse speaking at the link below from Exposing the Darkness at Substack:
They Will Inject You While You Are Unconscious
Related:
From Max Igan
Max speaks extensively on all global events, joining dots regarding the UN, WEF global agendas. If pressed for time, to hear info on the weird ship seen off the coast of Spain, go to 11 mins. He speaks about the anomalies around the unprecedented flooding recently experienced there.
Known as disaster capitalism, worldwide disasters, including earthquakes, are frequently surrounded with such events.
They do all tend to follow a familiar pattern. (I’m adding some links below, including NZ’s). And the weird ship … one was also seen off NZ’s coast (the Anadarko) at the time of the Christchurch earthquake in 2011.
READ AT THE LINK
From SAVE US NOW @ Substack
ITS NOT SMART ITS NOT CLEVER AND YOU NEED TO GET IT REMOVED BEFORE THEY PULL THE TRIGGER
Mark Steele, weapons expert, speaks on smart meters.
For more info on smart meters go here
From The Exposé
Through pacts the United Nations is hoping will be adopted in less than two weeks at the ‘Summit of the Future’, the UN is establishing a One World Government through the monopoly of national sovereignty.
However, there is no lawful authorisation for delegates to vote on the ‘Pact for the Future’, ‘Declaration for Future Generations’, ‘Global Digital Compact’ and António Guterres’ ‘Our Common Agenda’.
Serve this notice and declaration on the United Nations, your government representative to the United Nations and your government. Demand that your voice is heard before the exclusive Summit of The Future takes place from 20 to 23 September 2024.
The Summit of the Future is a high-level United Nations (“UN”) event scheduled for 22 and 23 September 2024, with “action days” being held on 20 and 21 September. The Summit will culminate in the adoption of the ‘Pact for the Future’.
Leaders from UN Member States will attend the Summit to reaffirm existing commitments, including the Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) and the UN Charter, and move towards a “reinvigorated multilateral” system.
It is expected that other participants of the Summit will include representatives from various UN agencies, selected non-governmental organisations, selected private sector businesses and industries, selected representatives from universities and research institutions, selected municipalities, regional governments and local authorities, and the dystopian and nefarious sounding “representatives of future generations.”
There are two chapters in the draft Pact of the Future: a chapter on science, technology, innovation and digital cooperation, and a chapter on youth and future generations. The draft chapter on youth and future generations builds on the 1997 ‘UNESCO Declaration on Responsibilities towards Future Generations’ and takes the perspective on future generations further.
Read more: An Overview of the Pact for the Future, UNESCO, 2 February 2024
Future generations are defined by the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ – the UN also refers to this document as ‘Declaration for Future Generations’ which is annexed to the Pact for the Future – as “all those generations that do not yet exist, and who will inherit this planet.”
By definition, the future generations will always “not yet exist,” ad infinitum. In 100 years, the future generations at that time will not yet exist. In 1,000 years, the same; future generations will not yet exist. The “future generations” concept is simply a poor excuse for a selected few – “representatives of future generations” – to make rules that they expect billions of people who do exist to obey, ad infinitum.
Further reading: UN Pact for the Future: All our lives will be dictated to by a selected UN envoy to represent generations not yet born
Who are the “representatives of future generations,” how many of them are there and who selects them? As is usual for the UN and its agencies, the document that member states are expected to adopt is sparse of such important details; perhaps it is because they don’t want member states to know who the few that are selected, or self-selected, to rule the world are.
The only details we’re given who the selected few rulers are is in The Declaration on Future Generations. It merely states that member states agree to the UN Secretary-General’s proposal of the appointment of a “UN Special Envoy for Future Generations,” which we assume may play a crucial role once they have been appointed. But as far as negotiations and representation for future generations at the Summit are concerned, the World Future Council (“WFC”) plays a leading role, or so they claim:
The World Future Council is well placed to play a leading role in the Summit of the Future, having focussed on the rights of futures [sic] generations as its main task since its launch 15 years ago.
The WFC has long pleaded for Representatives/ Guardians of Future Generations to be installed at international, national and local levels, with authority to scrutinise and propose policies to uphold their interests, including the right to peace, intergenerational justice, and a healthy, sustainable environment.
From the very beginning the World Future Council is mainly involved in the preparations of the Summit and its preparatory process.UN Summit of the Future – towards a global Pact for the Future, World Futures Council
It’s almost irrelevant who and how many are involved in the small clique dictating what people who do exist should do for people who do “not yet exist.” The concept of “future generations” dictating our lives alone, as with the entire Pact for the Future, is enough to outright reject it before it even gets to the stage of the UN appointing a “Special Envoy for Future Generations.”
To this end, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed has prepared a notice for anyone from any country to serve on their country’s UN representative ahead of the Summit. She has also included a list of permanent country representatives and observers to the United Nations so citizens can easily find who the notice should be served on. AS Mohamed recommends, don’t forget to copy in your Member of Parliament or government representative. And since some local municipality and government representatives may be attending the Summit, or so it is claimed, perhaps copy them in too.
UN_Notice_And_Declaration_2024_UpdatedDownload
The following is summarised and paraphrased from the notice for serving on the UN representative and/or observers from your country. You can read and download the full notice either in the file attached above or on Mohamed’s Substack page HERE.
Mohamed’s document contains three notices in one:
She has organised the document into five sections:
The UN system is intended to operate on the principle of the Rule of Law, as outlined in the UN’s own official documentation. The intention of this principle is to ensure transparency, accountability and respect for human rights in all UN activities and decision-making processes. Yet, during the covid event, the UN was fully aware of human rights abuses around the world. This includes draconian lockdowns, state violence, poverty and destructive social crisis.
Additionally, before any government can declare a state of emergency, it must show that the alleged public health crisis “threatens the life of the nation” according to specific criteria. These criteria were not met for covid; international law was knowingly violated.
Deepening the distrust in the UN is its inaction and silence against those who intimidated delegates at the 77th World Health Assembly into agreeing with amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005.
Due to a lack of comprehensive public participation relating to the UN Secretary-General’s ‘Our Common Agenda’ document and the ‘Pact for the Future’ – with its annexes the ‘Global Digital Compact’ and the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ – We The People insist that the following are included in the discussions of and report on the Summit of the Future:
We demand that both the Pact for the Future and Our Common Agenda be withdrawn at the upcoming Summit for the Future. Should this not happen, member state delegates, who answer to the people of the countries they represent, must reject these documents outright. They must not be intimidated for doing so, as was the case at the WHO’s World Health Assembly in May this year about International Health Regulations 2005.
Explainer: The UN operates a “silence procedure.” This is when a proposal or text is circulated among participants, often with a deadline for comments or amendments. If no objections are raised before the deadline, the text is considered adopted by all participants. If a participant still has fundamental issues with the text, they can “break the silence” by raising an objection before the deadline. This allows for further negotiations or revisions.
The notice prepared by Mohamed notes that the silence procedure on the Declaration on Future Generations has been broken. However, the UN has withheld which countries voiced objections to this Declaration. “Civil society has a right to know which countries have objected,” Mohamed’s notice states.
The United Nations faces legitimate criticism for consistently falling far short of legitimate expectations and demands that the UN documents and its staff have proclaimed. This includes ongoing secretive negotiations on the Pact for the Future and Our Common Agenda. There has been little to no meaningful public participation at the UN and member state level. There is therefore growing international resistance.
The UN also faces criticism for, inter alia, top-down approaches and political and economic influences.
In 2020, UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, issued a vision for human rights, titled ‘The Highest Aspiration: A Call to Action for Human Rights’. In it, “The ‘three P’s’: participation, protection and promotion” were highlighted. These undertakings have not been achieved by the UN. The UN has failed to uphold its commitments in general, and in particular, in relation to the Pact for the Future, the Declaration on Future Generations, the Global Digital Compact and Our Common Agenda.
The UN is fully aware that it is only a select group of civil society organisations that interact with the UN or that have a seat at the table. Even these organisations continue to complain about the lack of inclusion, transparency and respect afforded to them by the UN and its agencies, including the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) and the IMF.
Civil society non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”) have expressed discontent with the UN’s transparency and lack of inclusion, particularly in the accreditation process for NGOs seeking consultative status with the UN. Key issues include bias in the ECOSOC Committee, lack of transparency in decision-making, restrictive criteria and limited representation.
In September 2023 a letter was sent by 11 member state delegates UN GA president Dennis Francis and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. The member states were objecting to unilateral coercive measures and violations of human rights and international law relating to the adoption of a high level political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.
The political declaration was being adopted using the “silence procedure.” Both WHO Director-General Adhanom Tedros Ghebreyesus and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres ignored this letter from the 11 member states and declared that all 193 member states of the United Nations had approved the political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
Through the Pact for the Future, Our Common Agenda and Emergency Platform, the UN is establishing a One World Government through the monopoly of national sovereignty.
There is no lawful authorisation to vote on the Pact for the Future, Declaration for Future Generations, Global Digital Compact, and Our Common Agenda.
Featured image: Planning ahead: Five things to know about the UN’s landmark Summit of the Future, United Nations. This is an image taken from the UN’s webpage for the Summit of the Future. Notice the snakes, three heads, wrapping around the world!
Like your (pretend) govt the kindly UN really loves you. They promise you will own nothing & be happy. Their plans are always there in plain sight if you care to search out and read them. See the latest planned for 2025.
Excerpt: Failure to comply or resist will be met by violent and brutal force, and those not in compliance should expect to be shot on sight
Read at the link
From freenz.substack.com
Whistleblower Barry Young provides his data on the young New Zealanders, aged 40 and under, who died between the nationwide rollout of the covid vaccination in 2021, and who were registered as having had at least one dose of Covid vaccination before November 2023. (Short Clip … Be sure to scroll down to the full video and do read the comments).
To the parents of the little ones listed there who were cut off from the tender age of 5 years old … my deep condolences. I can’t begin to imagine your grief.
Note to Ken at comments: if you genuinely wish to communicate with me please use the contact form.
RELATED:
They want to kill you – Here’s how they’ll do it – Dr Vernon Coleman
They Are Censoring & Silencing Us – (Liz Gunn important followup)
Richard Vobes
Whistleblower, Irene Chain joins me to explain how the important role of the midwife is being manipulated in New Zealand, as well as the rest of the world.
RELATED
Cervix with a smile, unjabbed midwife Irene Kalinowski, Author of “My Body my baby” Vinny Eastwood
Note the full article is worth the very low priced sub … as recommended previously. You still get to read more than a small part of this article. Those trails are not conspiracy & there it all is in their own documentation. See also this page for evidence of these metals in NZ rainwater ….EWNZ
The United States, Germany and United Kingdom teamed up to spam the sky with chemicals to make fake comets and artificial auroras. Oh, and they also wanted to see if it BLOCKS THE SUN…
Although they tell us, “Chemtrails aren’t real”, and, “the government isn’t intentionally releasing anything into the sky”, almost 40 years ago, NASA published a document called Astronautics and Aeronautics for 1985, which outlined the creation of their program that intentionally released chemicals into the sky… the exact same chemicals that are still coming down in our rain water and snow… because they are still being intentionally released… by the government… into the sky. Duh.
I just finished writing a 4-part series about NASA. In this series we asked, How Fake is NASA?, then looked at almost 60 YEARS of Space propaganda leading up to the first space venture in history. In the second part of the series we looked at The NASA PSYOP and tried to locate 1 real photograph of outer space. Part 3 was called How to Fake Space, and showed NASA’s CGI glitches, harnesses, green screens and more. In the grand finale to the series we examined Who is NASA and Why would they Lie? All of this evidence, combined together, leads us to ask, “If they’re not going to Space, WTF is $25+ billion (in tax dollars) PER YEAR BEING SPENT ON?”. Perhaps we can answer that today.
READ AT THE LINK
Photo: Agent131711’s Substack
From Steve Kirsch @ Substack
Here are the emails I sent to the Australian attorneys hired by HNZ and the NZ ERA . Bottom line: Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea. Never. I will not comply.
Maybe they should change their tagline to “Hiding public health records from the public since 2022.”
Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea, especially when you are killing the public with a vaccine you are pushing.
Health New Zealand can’t explain how their data is consistent with a safe vaccine (it isn’t).
So they are trying to con my hosting provider into taking down my site. Shame on them! Censoring truth is never a good plan and those participating in such an effort should be ashamed of themselves.
Why can’t we have a public discussion on what the data says instead of trying to censor the truth?
Here are two emails I just sent out. Enjoy.
From: Steve Kirsch
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:13 PM
To: Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa
Subject: URGENT – Deletion request
Importance: High
Hi Anthony,
What a pleasure to meet you!
If you want me to remove PHI, I would be happy to do so.
Why didn’t you just ask me nicely? Doing an end-run directly to my hosting provider doesn’t sound like you are dealing in good faith.
I’m sure you want to save lives just like I do, but pulling a stunt like this is NOT HELPFUL to building a great relationship with me.
As you know, you have no jurisdiction over me or my hosting provider. So pissing me off is simply NOT a good idea. It doesn’t serve your client well to do that.
You’ll have as much luck COMPELLING me to remove the data as the DOJ had with the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers. You should study that decision. It didn’t end well for the DOJ. Here’s a link.
I’ve told Margie Apa that I’d be happy to remove any MRN which discloses PHI.
I also shared my offer to her publicly.
She ignored my request. I don’t get it.
If you want to mitigate damages, ignoring my request is stupid.
I suggest you tell them to IMMEDIATELY supply a list of offending MRNs and the NHI number which matches. Will you do that for me?
As far as I know, all the records I published are fully obfuscated so that it is impossible, even for me, to discover the PHI of any person or match the MRN with an NHI.
The records I published do not match the records of any person living or dead. Not a single one. Am I mistaken?
If Health New Zealand disagrees, kindly provide the MRN and the matching NHI identifier.
If you cannot do this, then what’s the issue?
I don’t want to harm anyone, and I’m happy to VOLUNTARILY redact any offending records, but you have provided NO EVIDENCE OF HARM.
I request that you IMMEDIATELY provide a list of offending MRNs and the associated NHI so that damages can be mitigated.
I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions. I’m in California and you can call up to 10pm PST.
Finally, 2 months ago, I published an article “An offer you can’t refuse.”
Health New Zealand took NO ACTION on my request.
If they publish the FULL data, I’m happy to remove my data as it will no longer be needed. Why did they ignore that? That’s another way to solve the problem.
I look forward to hearing from you.
-steve
P. S. Barry Young is a hero. These records prove that Health New Zealand has been KILLING people with these vaccines. Maybe you should ask them to look at the data that was leaked? I requested a meeting with their epidemiologists to explain to me why, if the vaccine is safe, the mortality curves between vaxxed and background diverge. THEY REFUSED TO DO THAT. Why would they do that unless they are HIDING SOMETHING: like the fact that the vaccines are the cause of the excess deaths of THOUSANDS of people in New Zealand. Why can’t we talk about it? I’d be happy to invite YALE PROFESSOR HARVEY RISCH to the meeting; he is one of the TOP EPIDEMIOLOGISTS in the world. WHY CAN’T WE TALK ABOUT IT?
To: christchurchera@era.govt.nz
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa; Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Subject: [2023] NZERA 718 3266200 Health New Zealand will not comply with my request to mitigate damages. They should be ordered to supply offending MRNs
Importance: High
Barry Young disclosed the information to me. I am a US journalist and published the obfuscated records on the Internet.
I told the chief executive of Health New Zealand I’d be happy to VOLUNTARILY remove any record which “would likely have significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their whanau.”
They have refused to comply with my request.
I request the ERA order them to supply me with the offending records (using the MRN record identifier) and explain how it is possible for the record to be matched to any person, dead or alive, in a way that harms that person.
All the records were obfuscated using a ONE WAY randomization algorithm so that the data for a given person cannot be identified. Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for any person to identify someone else’s record.
So a breach of PHI is IMPOSSIBLE. No one has contacted me to remove their record because nobody can find their record because it is unfindable.
They need to provide proof to the ERA that there is at least one of the 4M records published on my S3 site that could reveal PHI or could have SIGNIFICANT or IRREPARABLE consequences.
Where is that proof?
They CANNOT meet that burden.
I said I would remove any such record from my website voluntarily.
They REFUSED to identify the MRN(s) of any such records!!!
They should be ordered by the ERA to identify the MRNs of these records IMMEDIATELY to mitigate damages.
If they fail to do that, they should be held accountable for any such harm that their inaction has caused.
I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.
They refuse to engage in dialog to settle this matter.
I have NO desire to harm people, but they refuse to provide any evidence of harm.
Where is the list of MRNs to be removed and the description of the irreparable harm for each of the records requested?
They will not provide this voluntarily. THEY SHOULD BE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THIS LIST IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ANY DAMAGES CAN BE MITIGATED.
Steve Kirsch
US journalist
Health New Zealand is trying to enforce an order which was obtained under false pretenses claiming that there are “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families” through the publication of the obfuscated records.
This is blatantly false.
They cannot identify a single record in the data that I publicly released that can cause “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families.” Not a single one.
When I asked them to identify the MRN of any offending record so that I can voluntarily remove it, they refused to respond to my request.
What they want is to have the entire database taken down to cover their crime.
They’ve been killing people and they are unable to explain their own data.
Even top New Zealand experts can’t explain away the New Zealand data leaked by Barry Young. Epic fail every time. It’s ludicrous. For example, Janine Paynter got so pissed that I wasn’t falling for her bullshit handwaving arguments that she blocked me. Way to resolve conflict Janine! Maybe try data next time instead of nonsensical bullshit arguments?
Health New Zealand wants the public health data censored so the public won’t have the evidence to convict them of negligent homicide. It’s as simple as that.
Sorry, but I’m not going to be a party to the cover up of the crime scene.
Please share this post widely, especially if you live in New Zealand.
SOURCE
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/health-new-zealand-is-at-it-again
RELATED:
My generous offer sent to Health New Zealand today… you’re going to love it!
$25,000 reward for the first person to show that I’ve leaked any PHI
EWNZ Comment: all that stands out for me about this man is the smirk we saw on his face when he said in the midst of ‘their’ plandemic that destroyed countless people’s lives … ‘wait until we see the next one [fake ‘virus’] … that, and 47K crippled children …. he is no philanthropist ..
“Gates doesn’t simply receive rent checks from his Nebraska farmland. He’s also using it to borrow staggering sums of money.”
From expose-news .com
In 2017, the Canadian board made the decision to sell a significant portion of its American farmland portfolio, which amounted to half a billion dollars and included all 22,830 acres of its land in Nebraska. The purchaser and financial details of these seemingly ordinary Nebraska farms remained undisclosed until recently, it has now been revealed that the individual behind this purchase is none other than Bill Gates and over the past six years, Gates has has invested more than $113 million in purchasing farmland in Nebraska.
Gates’ ownership of farmland is structured through over 20 shell companies located across the country. Some of these entities trace back to a P.O. Box in Kirkland, Washington, where Cascade Asset Management, responsible for managing all of Gates’ investments, is headquartered. Bill Gates’ Nebraska neighbors don’t know he owns the soybean field down the road.
Here’s the story of his spending spree, including the massive loan he took out against his land by Destiny Herbers of Flatwater Press.
READ AT THE LINK
Kiwis (in case you think we’re GE free) go here for up to date info on topic for NZ … that clean green paradise (not) in the Sth Pacific … (see also here, here, here and here) … EWNZ
From Jon Rappoport @ Substack
I found an interesting section in an FDA report, “GMO Crops, Animal Food, and Beyond.” The information is listed as current as of August 2022.
Are There GMO Animals in the Food Supply? Yes. FDA has approved an application allowing the sale of the AquAdvantage Salmon to consumers. The AquAdvantage Salmon has been genetically modified to reach an important growth point faster. FDA has also approved an alteration in the GalSafe pig for human food consumption and potential therapeutic uses. The GalSafe pig was developed to be free of detectable alpha-gal sugar on its cell surfaces. People with Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) may have allergic reactions to alpha-gal sugar found in red meat (e.g., beef, pork, and lamb). FDA has determined that food from the AquAdvantage Salmon and the GalSafe pig are as safe and nutritious to eat as food from non-GMO salmon and pigs.
Sounds wonderful. Shall we try a bit of each? I’ve ways wanted to eat salmon that was engineered to grow faster than usual.
Perhaps we should read a piece in the Alaska Beacon first. Title: “Pushback continues against genetically modified salmon being raised at Indiana farm.” October 10, 2023.
Engineered by biotech company AquaBounty Technologies Inc., the “AquAdvantage” salmon is the first such altered animal to be cleared for human consumption in the United States.
In 2018, the federal agency greenlit AquaBounty’s sprawling Indiana facility, which as of last December was raising roughly 492 metric tons of salmon from eggs imported from Canada but is capable of raising more than twice that amount. The company is currently making improvements to its Indiana production facility. Once completed, salmon harvests are expected to increase.
During the 2023 Farm Aid concert site, organizers from Block Corporate Salmon traveled an hour north to AquaBounty’s salmon growing facility where they sought to raise awareness about the “risks and harms” of genetically engineered fish.
“AquaBounty misrepresents its system to raise salmon in tanks that they claim will be recirculating water,” said Jaydee Hanson, Policy Director of Center for Food Safety. “In fact, their operations literally mine water, foul it with salmon feces, and dump it into the nearest river. They have a serious problem of illness in their chronically inflamed fish. They are not disclosing how many antibiotics they use. Consumers don’t need sick fish like these.”
Earlier, in 2022, Block Corporate Salmon also released “AquaBounty Exposed,” a report that outlined allegedly concerning conditions at AquaBounty’s Albany facility.
Former employee Braydon Humphrey, who spoke at last month’s news conference, shared more than 60 pages of photos and videos that he claims detail how AquaBounty “regularly violated food and worker safety standards, ignored animal welfare concerns, and caused environmental damage unbeknownst to the public and its investors.”
“I was deeply disturbed by what I witnessed during my time at AquaBounty,” said Humphrey, who worked as a tech at the Indiana facility from December 2018 to January 2020. “Among other atrocities, we saw high mortalities in densely packed fish tanks—including common instances of AquAdvantage salmon dying from ruptured stomachs, caused by their artificially fast growth rate.”
—Waiter? I’ll pass on the salmon. How about the rattlesnake fang sushi instead? I think it’ll be safer.
And now, on to the GalSafe GMO pigs. Approved for people with meat allergies. Sort of.
A publication called The Counter brings up rather disturbing facts.
FDA only evaluated [the pig producer] Revivicor’s claim that GalSafe pigs are, in fact, free of alpha-gal and safe to eat. But because Revivicor did not provide data or make claims related to food allergies, FDA didn’t “evaluate food safety specific to those with [alpha-gal syndrome].” In other words, GalSafe pigs aren’t expected to trigger reactions in people with red meat allergies, but FDA has not scrutinized any allergy-related guarantees. “People with an alpha-gal allergy that would like to consume meat from these pigs but have questions should talk to their doctor,” an agency spokesperson said in an emailed statement. This caveat is worrisome for some consumer interest advocates, who believe that FDA jumped the gun with its approval.
“It shouldn’t have been approved until they had adequately addressed the allergenicity of the product,” said Jaydee Hanson, policy director for the Center for Food Safety.
Eating the GMO pigs might be a problem for people with allergies. Or it might not.
Very good. Glad we got that straight.
Another brilliant decision from the FDA.
When I eat GMO bacon or GMO salmon—I have a special microscope that allows me to make that determination—I drop the meat in a vat full of a propriety poison I manufacture in my garage. It removes any trace of GMO problems. So far, only one of my arms has fallen off from the poison.
It’s a trade-off.
Or Love your GMOs. Assume They’re good for you.
— Jon Rappoport
Episode 57 of Rappoport Podcasts—“Aaron Rodgers and the death of television! Rodgers, Jimmy Kimmel, Jeffrey Epstein, COVID, Fauci, ESPN, Disney, Taylor Swift, ‘Mr. Pfizer’—it’s one big ball of wax; Let’s melt it down and see what it looks like”—is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen, go here. To learn more about this episode of Rappoport Podcasts, go here.
Thousands of paid subscribers
The Hottest Takes on Culture
Image by Dmitry Grushin from Pixabay
From Lioness of Judah Ministry @ Substack
“We have a national security crisis: The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population.”
This is all you need to know about the “unexplained” surge in sudden deaths:
“If the sudden deaths we’re seeing were occurring in the unvaccinated, this would be on every news channel 24/7. But it’s not.”
“The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population. I blame the vaccines. If it’s not that, then what is it?
And why aren’t we talking about it?”
SHORT VIDEO AT THE LINK (from Vigilant Fox @ Substack)
RELATED (Steve Kirsch)
The UK ONS isn’t ignoring me anymore, thanks to help from an influential MP Andrew Bridgen
Image by Alex Peroff from Pixabay
From Steve Kirsch @ Substack
They will do everything to gaslight you into believing otherwise. The one thing they won’t do is have a civil debate with me on the time-series analysis or explain to anyone how it is wrong.
No country has ever disclosed patient record-level data on any vaccine ever before in history.
The reason for this is not due to privacy concerns. I proved that after I released the NZ data publicly and not a single person could find their records.
The reason that governments don’t release the public health data is that it would reveal that they have been systematically killing their citizens with these “vaccines.”
Finally, one brave guy, Barry Young, an Oracle DBA at Health New Zealand, leaks the data to me. I obfuscated it to preserve privacy, and then made it publicly available for everyone to see.
Health New Zealand chief executive Margie Apa blows a fuse and has my Wasabi site taken down (so I instantly put up again at a bulletproof hosting firm) and has her chief people officer, Andrew Slater, write a note to me informing me of the orders they obtained in New Zealand. Slater conveniently fails to mention he has no jurisdiction over me. This is a scare tactic to silence me. When I ask Slater if I can talk to the epidemiologists, he ghosts me. Nice guy.
None of the leadership team at Health New Zealand is interested in the fact that their database shows they are killing New Zealanders with these vaccines. They will not let me speak to any of their epidemiologists and they won’t show me the time series analysis done by their epidemiologists for some reason. Why not? That’s the best way to silence me: just show me how I got it wrong.
Two New Zealand scientists at the University of Auckland, Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris, have viewed the leaked data, but refuse to publish their report. Nor will they explain how my analysis is wrong. They do not want to engage in any scientific discussion at all. I can’t even pay them to tell me how I got it wrong. I even offered them $250,000 to talk to me. No response. This is because the data leaked by Barry Young is a third-rail for them.
Barry Young is being charged with a crime. But the reality is that HNZ has given us a gift.
When Barry has his day in court, he gets to do something none of us have been able to do: force these people to answer the questions we’ve always wanted to know the answer to but they always refused to answer.
These are questions such as:
I can’t wait.
In the meantime, here’s a very brief summary of the New Zealand data for people to chew on.
I’d be delighted to debate any of this with a qualified epidemiologist who disagrees with me, but so far no takers.
What does that tell you?
Lots of people will try to gaslight you into thinking the NZ data is a nothing burger.
They are wrong.
Unfortunately, none of them will go “on camera” to allow me to challenge them about their claims of missing data, no control group, under-reported deaths, it’s HVE, etc.
I have an open offer to any of them. The only rules I have are: no insults and each side gets the same amount of talk time.
Apparently, that’s too challenging for them to agree to.
Darn. Darn. Darn.
I am lonelier than the Maytag repairman.
The time-series cohort analysis I did on the New Zealand data is definitive.
Here’s just one example of what it shows.
This is for doses 2 through 4. Doses 2 and 4 are given when the death rate is going down. Dose 3 is given when the seasonal death rate is increasing. There are 1.7 times as many person days in the 2,4 cohort vs. the dose 3 cohort. So the slope should be going down. It doesn’t. It goes up. This is the smoking gun. Nobody can explain it. This happens in other countries as well (see this post which references S3.B in this paper as well as this article).
Mortality rate in deaths per 100K person years vs. week number since vaccine administered (x-axis). This is for doses 2 through 4. It’s “supposed” to slope down due to seasonality. The slope goes the wrong way if the vax is safe. Nobody can explain this. This is not due to the “healthy vaccinee effect” (HVE) which lasts only 4 weeks.
You can also look at Dose 4 alone. I picked everyone who got the shot in July 2022 so I could track this vs. the background deaths in NZ. The death rate goes up if you got the shot while the rest of New Zealand’s death rate is falling.
As you can see, the elderly, for which the death rate should be dramatically falling, experiences the opposite effect if they’ve been jabbed:
Pivot table analysis of people who got Dose 4 in July 2022. Their deaths per month increase when they should be decreasing.
We don’t need to get any more complicated than these two examples.
They are simply unexplainable if the vaccines are safe.
Barry Young is a hero.
Not only did he publicly expose the data that definitively shows the COVID vaccines are killing people, but he also gets to compel these epidemiologists to finally explain how I got it wrong.
I can’t wait. I’ve been pleading for qualified scientists to set me on the right path for years now with no success. They all refuse to explain the observations above (or give me bogus answers like “it’s HVE”).
It’s a shame that Barry had to be arrested for us to get answers, but it’s clear that a court hearing is simply the only way to compel qualified scientists to answer questions nowadays.
And a big thank you to Health New Zealand for having Barry arrested which will give Barry this opportunity to expose the real criminals in his court hearing. It will be epic. I can’t wait.
SOURCE
From Mark Crispin Miller
The US under “Joe Biden” is a rogue state doing all it can for world depopulation, through incessant WAR all over
I wrote the following article a few days ago. It was published in a somewhat watered down form by Sputnik International News. (MSM is the same everywhere, it only varies by degrees.) This is the original. Feel free to publish or share. The news it contains IS important. There is also a link to a second article with very important news below my article.
Reuters reports that NATO “exercise” Steadfast Defender 2024, will begin on Monday, January 22nd, and will run “through” May, which means until June. The deployment will include 90,000 troops, 50 ships, including aircraft carriers, more than 80 combat aircraft, including fighter jets, and over 1,100 combat vehicles, including at least 133 tanks and over 500 infantry fighting vehicles. The fact that the “exercise’ begins next week, and the Western MSM is only now publicizing it, means that all the military assets are already in position. They’re not “coming”, they’re here.
January 18, 2024
This is the biggest NATO combined arms “exercise” since REFORGER 1988, back when the USSR and Warsaw pact were still in existence. In other words, this is the biggest NATO troop movement since the end of the Cold War, almost doubling the previous largest, which was 50,000 troops involved in Trident Juncture in 2018. 90,000 troops on the move for almost half a year, concentrating in the Baltic states on Russia’s borders, in Romania, on the Ukraine border, and in Germany, the military logistics hub of NATO, and where it all started “last time”. You know what I mean.
Politics and war can best be exemplified by the game of chess. In chess, there are three specific stages – the opening, the middle game, and the end game. The opening is when the two opponents move their pawns into a defensive line and develop the major pieces for maneuver. It is relatively bloodless, and if done correctly, more strategic than tactical. There is no defining moment when the game transitions from the opening game to the middle game, but the middle game is where the fighting really begins, and you know it when you get there.
The middle game is where the majority of pieces are lost, the fighting is most intense, and surprise moves are most likely. The game can often end in checkmate during this phase, with one side being totally defeated by a surprise move they did not see coming. Remember that.
If there is no surprise defeat, the middle game is usually short, and when it is over, the chessboard is vastly different than when it began. In the end game, the majority of pieces on both sides have been eliminated, only a few pieces remain – the kings, of course, and a few pieces close to them, defending them. From here, the game ends in checkmate, a definitive defeat of one side or the other, or a stalemate, where both sides agree that neither can win, thus ending the game, and agreeing to start over at some time in the future.
(Russell Bentley in the opening game, on frontline position “Blesna”, 2015)
With Steadfast Defender, Europe (and probably the world) enter the middle game. Fasten your seatbelts, we are in for a rough ride. This middle game will almost certainly not be confined to Europe. and before it is over, will most probably include surprise moves in the form of the use of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. No place on Earth will be safe, except, perhaps, for the luxury bunkers of the world’s billionaire elite. Maybe not even there…
The “Great Reset” has been interpreted by some as code for a depopulation plan to cull the human herd of the majority of its members. This idea has been dismissed by popular culture as just another “conspiracy theory”, but in reality, it remains the most plausible explanation for the many developments of the last few years. For instance –
The proof that the covid virus, and the “vaccine” it engendered, are actually biological weapons grows stronger every day. The genocide in Gaza, and Israel’s absolute disregard for international law and total lack of any meaningful response to it by the UN or international “community”, the intentional destruction of the US and European economies, spending, borrowing and looting national treasuries as if there were no tomorrow, the ecological destruction fomented by the very ones who pass draconian laws they claim are in order to protect it, the disinformation and gaslighting aimed at destroying people’s very ability to discern truth, and therefore, reality …
All of these developments that have intensified and accelerated in the last few years, when taken as a whole, can only be rationally and realistically explained thusly – “They (the global Parasite Class) are not stupid, they are doing it on purpose.” If there really is a plan by world elites to depopulate the planet, (There is, because) everything they have done would be exactly the way they would do it. Think about it. Prepare. And don’t forget to say your prayers. The middle game, just like Steadfast Defender, is already upon us. The end game begins soon, but it may well end in a stalemate like this…
======================================================
by Greg Hunter
Posted by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World @ Substack
David Rogers Webb (DRW) is a financial expert and former global money manager who lives in Sweden. Recently, DRW revealed the game plan of globalists like Klaus Schwab who publicly predicts, “You will own nothing . . .” According to DRW, this is not some idle threat but a complicated active plan demonic Deep State globalist central bankers have been working on for decades. DRW has explained this theft in a free book and documentary called “The Great Taking.” It is a stunning plan to steal almost all wealth and legally not be required to pay one red cent for it. The plan is in the process of unfolding now. DRW explains, “The core of what I am showing here is about securities, stocks and bonds. I also go into the good old fashion way of doing it, which is taking anything encumbered with debt. That’s been done for centuries. They create a cycle where there is a fall in price, and then anyone who is in debt is in trouble, and the collateral is taken. This was the big hammer in ‘The Great Taking 1.0,’ which was the Great Depression. In this go-around, ‘The Great Taking 2.0,’ that is taking things that are not encumbered with debt. . . .There is very sophisticated subterfuge that has been put into place. . . . They have worked for half a century to put this in place. So, it is quite deliberate. This is not an accident.”
The privately owned stocks and bonds in brokerages are now collateral backing up the massive $2 quadrillion in derivatives in the world. DRW calls this a “sleight-of-hand” in regulations that changes ownership of securities in a severe financial meltdown, which is already planned. Actual owners of securities have no idea they are about to be robbed of their wealth. DRW says, “The public had property rights to these stocks and bonds, and they turned that into a contractual claim. So, they have no rights or standing in a bankruptcy. Then, the collateral is transported into the ‘Central Clearing Parties,’ which are set up to fail. They are actually preparing for that. When those fail, it is the secured creditors behind that derivatives complex that have ‘Super-Priority’ to take that collateral. This is what is meant by ‘You will own nothing.’ This is sleight-of-hand to take people’s assets to underpin these financial contracts. . . . I say derivatives are not real things, but they can be used to take the real things through this construct. . . . They are using these vast pools of client securities . . . as the collateral underpinning all these derivative contracts. . . . I think their goal is simply to take all the stuff, and it is taken free of payment.”
This is not just simple greed. It is war, and we are being attacked in ways we have never seen before such as the CV19 bioweapon vax that has already murdered millions of people globally. DRW says, “This is a full spectrum ‘Hybrid War’ because it is not a war between nation states. Russia has been held up as a boogeyman . . . In the book (The Great Taking), I show is a very elaborate structure put in place and implemented by the CIA, The Federal Reserve and the Department of State. This is not being run by the Chinese or the Russians. This is the central banks. . . . They are trying to collapse everything . . . we are in a war, and there are going to be big disruptions. . . . We are all in danger now.”
DRW says the best way to protect yourself is to get out of debt and stay out of debt. He also suggests you may want to sell your stocks and bonds now, and pay off your house or any debts you have. DRW says, “It’s better to get something now than get nothing later.”
There is much more in the 1-hour and 9-minute deep-dive on how central banks plan on stealing everything in the next financial crisis. This is a crisis that is coming much sooner than you have been told.
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he talks with David Rogers Webb, who is a financial expert and author of the free new book and documentary called “The Great Taking” for 1.20.24.
They want you dead.
Do NOT comply.
SOURCE
Tedros claims all nation must unite under a global policy and with global force against their common enemy for the next pandemic….
Yeah right!
READ AT THE LINK
From Dr Mark Crispin Miller @ Substack
Musicians in US (7), Brazil (2), UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Germany (2), Italy (3), Congo, Russia, India, Vietnam, Japan; cops in US (8), Brazil, Paraguay, Spain, Italy, India, Australia; & more
READ AT THE LINK
Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news
From Dr Mark Crispin Miller @ Substack
John Lodge, the bass guitarist and one of the primary singers and songwriters for the Moody Blues, is recuperating from what is described as a “serious medical issue” during the Christmas holiday. A January 11, 2024, post on hisFacebook page noted he is “already well on the mend.” However, the unidentified health issue has forced the postponement of his “Performs Days of Future Passed” U.S. tour that was planned for February and March.
READ MORE AT THE LINK
Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news
Nothing to do with the S&E of course… nothing at all… note they include autism & infertility as possible outcomes … folk have been raising alarms on this for years while now it’s a handy go to for letting the aforesaid ‘treatment’ off the hook…
Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news
From the Daily Mail
Forever chemicals’ linked to cancer are found in virtually every food product sold in American stores, a shocking report suggests.
The watchdog Consumer Reports tested 85 everyday items for the presence of phthalates and bisphenols, two types of PFAS chemicals used to make plastics….
It comes amid growing fears about the massive amounts of chemicals being ingested by Americans every year – and whether it is related to a mystery spike in cancers among young people.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE
Why ever would they refuse? It would prove to the nay sayers the needles were safe & effective. (On the SE topic check out Jon Rappoport’s latest comment, hint, it’s about the FDA). They won’t ever of course (even though some have already done smaller studies, never reported on) because well, they know who will lose hands down… (See also here, here, here & here). One of those links I had to retrieve from archives in Way Back Machine. See how this info is diligently scrubbed from everywhere? … EWNZ
Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news
Photo: pixabay.com
You must be logged in to post a comment.