Unstitching what happened to the New Zealand teachers who were sacked as a result of the NZ COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 is proving a long and depressing task. But it is essential. This post continues the conversation about what went on behind the scenes when, on Nov 15th 2021, Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins declared all teaching staff should be ‘vaccinated’.
Brief Background to the NZ ‘No Jab, No Job’ Mandates:
I’ve explained previously about how the NZ Government secretly worked with the biggest commercial companies behind the scenes during August and Sept 2021. The ‘pilot scheme’ took place over 6 weeks and involved analysing various coercive strategies, or ‘nudges’, in order to get the maximum numbers of Kiwi folk compliant with the experimental injections. The subsequent ‘staff consultation period’ then, was a sham…
A group of eminent scientists from the prestigious Yale University is sounding the alarm after a long-term study found that Covid mRNA “vaccines” remain in the bodies of recipients and continue to cause harm for years after the last injection.
Shockingly, the researchers found that the genetic material from the “vaccines” can integrate into human DNA.
The unpublished study is led by world-renowned Yale scientist Dr. Akiko Iwasaki.
The findings have sent shockwaves through the scientific community as they conflict with the “safe and effective” dogma that has been pushed by health officials, doctors, politicians, and the corporate media.
During their study, the researchers analyzed people who had received at least one shot of a Covid mRNA “vaccine” but had never been infected with COVID-19.
This was to rule out the possibility that the virus could have caused genetic material traces in the bloodstream.
As we’ve seen before with other vaccine side effects, such as myocarditis, the virus has often been blamed.
The researchers found that uninfected patients who had received an mRNA shot still had spike protein in their bloodstream years after their last injection.
Dr. Iwasaki found evidence of the spike protein still being present 700 days after the recipient received the last shot.
Several of the other recipients had received their last injection over 450 days prior and still had “vaccine” spike protein in their bodies.
In addition, the Yale researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators).
The drop in CD4 T cells indicates that “vaccinated” individuals are suffering long-term immunosuppression.
These findings reveal that genetic material from the Covid mRNA injections is integrating with human DNA.
According to Alex Berenson, the integration with human DNA explains the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream in vaccinated individuals.
The fact that the study was led by Dr. Iwasaki is also notable.
Iwasaki had previously advocated for the vaccine and dismissed safety concerns as “absurd.”
During the pandemic, she also publicly supported vaccine mandates.
However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue.
Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications.
The study from the highly respected team of scientists could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media.
According to Midwestern Doctor, Yale officials revealed that there is a “battle going on” to suppress the study and prevent it from being published.
“A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it,” the doctor revealed.
“We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community).
“In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).”
The Yale scientists are reportedly planning to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server.
Meanwhile, leading medical experts have been raising the alarm after a new study proved that vaccinated people can pass on the genetic material from the mRNA injections to people who have never received a shot.
As Slay News reported, the major new peer-reviewed study has confirmed that unvaccinated people can suffer from the harmful side effects of Covid mRNA “vaccines” by just being around people who have received the injections.
The study finally confirms the existence of “vaccine shedding” – an issue previously shot down by health officials as a “conspiracy theory.”
Alarmingly, the study found that unvaccinated people suffer vaccine harms even if they are “indirectly exposed” to those who received Covid mRNA shots.
A study titled, “Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals,” was just published in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
The team of top American researchers behind the study was led by Professor Jill Newman and Dr. Sue E. Peters.
One of the authors of the study wrote:
“After more than a year of censorship from the medical journals, our landmark study and manuscript have been published demonstrating significant circumstantial evidence that something is being shed from the COVID-19 vaccinated population to the unvaccinated population.
“It is far beyond time for these toxic injections to be withdrawn from the market.”
Reacting to the study’s alarming findings, esteemed physician Dr. Pierre Kory wrote on X:
“The most puzzling thing we’ve seen with the vaccine is its ability to ‘shed’ and harm those who never got it.
“A peer-reviewed study just validated the thousands of shedding reports sent to us.”
Dr. Kory also detailed the “vaccine shedding” phenomenon during an interview on American Thought Leaders.
He spoke up very loudly early on in the plandemic and put his colleagues on notice about administering the treatment hailed as ‘safe and effective’ but which he had noted, was killing people. Do watch his clip – he is bold and specific in his announcement…
“Stop forcing these vaccines on people who are getting killed by them!”
Before long many of these white coats, I now refer to them as, start filing out one by one.
They are no longer to be trusted.
He doesn’t blame them however and explains that they are powerfully persuaded by Big pHarma and peer/colleague pressure.
Notice how lamestream headlines in caps the anti vax rhetoric. Anything to divert your attention from his real message.
“Edward Dowd, world-renowned data expert has just issued a red alert after uncovering evidence that reveals excess deaths are continuing to skyrocket in children who received” the safe & effective treatment.
A world-renowned data expert has just issued a red alert after uncovering evidence that reveals excess deaths are continuing to skyrocket in children who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
According to an alarming warning from leading Wall Street data analyst Ed Dowd, excess child deaths are still accelerating and show no sign of slowing down.
Dowd is a former executive at the world’s largest investment firm BlackRock and is considered one of America’s leading data experts.
Through his expert analysis of insurance industry data, Dowd has become a prominent figure in investigations into the impact of the global Covid vaccination campaign.
Dowd is currently a founding partner with Phinance Technologies a global macro alternative investment firm.
The team at Phinance, which includes a handful of high-level scientists, data analysts, and financial experts, has been investigating surges in deaths and injuries following the Covid “vaccine” rollout.
During a new interview on “The Jimmy Dore Show,” Dowd produced shocking data showing that excess child deaths are still surging higher, long after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were first released almost four years ago.
Dowd made the discovery while analyzing the official data from the UK government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS).
“The UK has a problem,” Down warns.
However, while the deaths were identified in UK data, the trend is most likely reflected in other nations with a similar mass vaccination protocol, including the United States, Canada, Australia, and much of Europe.
Dowd’s data shows that excess deaths for children aged one to fourteen have surged higher each year since the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out in 2021.
According to Dowd, excess deaths for children in this age group spiked by a staggering 22% in 2023 – the last full year of data.
Dowd notes that this trend didn’t start until “the magic juice started to be issued to children later in 2021.”
The data shows that deaths were actually lower than expected in 2020 but started surging in 2021.
According to Dowd’s findings, each year’s data shows:
2020: 9 percent fewer deaths than expected
2021: 7 percent fewer deaths than expected
2022: 16 percent MORE deaths than expected
2023: 22 percent MORE deaths than expected
As Dowd notes, while the “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021, they were authorized for children later in the year.
Although the data for 2024 isn’t yet complete, Dowd reveals that, so far, the official figures show that the surging death trend has continued through this year.
“Figures from the Office for National Statistics show about 10% more deaths (across all age groups) than expected since April this year,” Down adds.
Yet, despite the clear correlation with the mass vaccination campaign, UK health officials insist that “circulatory diseases and diabetes are … behind the increase.”
WATCH: (click on image for video at rumble)
The revelation comes as Dowd and his team continue to uncover alarming data exposing the impact of the Covid mRNA “vaccines” on public health.
As Slay News previously reported, Dowd recently exposed the shocking number of sudden and unexpected deaths caused by the Covid mRNA “vaccines” around the world.
Dowd revealed that up to 15 million people have now been killed by the injections globally.
During an interview with Bret Weinstein, former professor of evolutionary biology, Dowd dropped bombshell figures for the number of vaccinated people who have died suddenly and unexpectedly.
“So five billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort,” Down told Weinstein.
“If you apply the range of the death rate in the US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally 7.3 million to 15 million died from the vaccine.”
Dowd’s upper-range numbers align with figures produced by leading expert Denis Rancourt, a former professor of physics at the University of Ottawa.
Rancourt estimates that 17 million people have been killed by the Covid shots.
However, despite the alarming nature of the death toll figures, Down revealed that the situation is far direr.
Dowd continued by detailing the number of people left injured and disabled from the injections.
“Disabilities, when you look at the ratio of four to one, you multiply the 7 million and the 15, approximately 15 million times four, you get a range of 29 to 60 million disabled globally.
“And then injuries, if you take 18% of the vaccinated, just using the Pfizer [trial data], so that again, this could be money, but we get a range of at the high end, 900 million, 500 million at the low end injured.
“500 million to 900 million who had an injury that has not disabled.”
To review the long lists of ‘Died Suddenly’ world wide see the substack of Dr Mark Crispin Miller (NY University) who is documenting them. More recently the listings of children began to increase.
Folk may recall an issue around the time of the experimental injection rollout that many of the injected found their injection sites were magnetic. (See here also). All quickly dismissed as ‘conspiracy theory’ the usual go-to of those who would hide the truth from you.
Anyway I also recall the magnetism noted in supermarket meat. So reading posts like this one from Exposing the Darkness @ Substack comes as no surprise at all. (What does suprise us these days?) So… Canada’s already injecting their pigs and shrimps… (note the US has been injecting pigs with DNA & RNA since 2017) … what else aren’t they telling us?
While Canada and now also NSW Australia are injecting mRNA into their livestock, Carter County Meats in Montana has taken a stand that they will not be coerced into injecting mRNA gene therapy into their livestock.
U.S. Democrats VOTED DOWN a bill that would have forced all meat products to clearly be labeled if injected mRNA vaccines. DNA and RNA have been in vaccines for pigs in the U.S. since 2017.
I’m adding a related post (in terms of what ‘they’ are doing to the animals) from a NZ writer at substack, Ursula Edgington. Her stack is called Informed Heart. Ursula has noted the application of IOB to the animals. They are (not so) cleverly moved around the paddocks with the use of electronic ‘nudges’….
Famously, Harari wrote about the Internet of Things and how humans are now “hackable animals”. And in The Internet of Bodies is Here (2000) – a report published by (who else?) the World Economic Forum – the authors warn us that:
Recent technological advancements have ushered in a new era of the “internet of bodies” (IoB), with an unprecedented number of connected devices and sensors being affixed to or even implanted and ingested into the [human] body.
Eeeek! No thanks. But it was part of NASA’s Internet of Animals, more specifically cows, that first ‘benefitted’ from the 5G technology in the UK. In New Zealand, the dairy sector contributes $billions to the economy and is one of its most dominant goods export sectors (e.g. China). So it made sense that NZ would be early adopters of a tech that nudges, pings and shocks cows to respond in certain ways to improve output.
Whistleblower Barry Young provides his data on the young New Zealanders, aged 40 and under, who died between the nationwide rollout of the covid vaccination in 2021, and who were registered as having had at least one dose of Covid vaccination before November 2023. (Short Clip … Be sure to scroll down to the full video and do read the comments).
To the parents of the little ones listed there who were cut off from the tender age of 5 years old … my deep condolences. I can’t begin to imagine your grief.
Note to Ken at comments: if you genuinely wish to communicate with me please use the contact form.
Richard Vobes Whistleblower, Irene Chain joins me to explain how the important role of the midwife is being manipulated in New Zealand, as well as the rest of the world.
Health New Zealand is at it again! They are trying to get my site taken down. Not going to happen
Here are the emails I sent to the Australian attorneys hired by HNZ and the NZ ERA . Bottom line: Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea. Never. I will not comply.
Maybe they should change their tagline to “Hiding public health records from the public since 2022.”
Executive summary
Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea, especially when you are killing the public with a vaccine you are pushing.
Health New Zealand can’t explain how their data is consistent with a safe vaccine (it isn’t).
So they are trying to con my hosting provider into taking down my site. Shame on them! Censoring truth is never a good plan and those participating in such an effort should be ashamed of themselves.
Why can’t we have a public discussion on what the data says instead of trying to censor the truth?
Here are two emails I just sent out. Enjoy.
My email to Clyde & Co, the Australia law firm sending emails to my hosting provider to have my site deleted
From: Steve Kirsch Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:13 PM To: Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com> Cc:Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa Subject: URGENT – Deletion request Importance: High
Hi Anthony,
What a pleasure to meet you!
If you want me to remove PHI, I would be happy to do so.
Why didn’t you just ask me nicely? Doing an end-run directly to my hosting provider doesn’t sound like you are dealing in good faith.
I’m sure you want to save lives just like I do, but pulling a stunt like this is NOT HELPFUL to building a great relationship with me.
As you know, you have no jurisdiction over me or my hosting provider. So pissing me off is simply NOT a good idea. It doesn’t serve your client well to do that.
You’ll have as much luck COMPELLING me to remove the data as the DOJ had with the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers. You should study that decision. It didn’t end well for the DOJ. Here’s a link.
I’ve told Margie Apa that I’d be happy to remove any MRN which discloses PHI.
If you want to mitigate damages, ignoring my request is stupid.
I suggest you tell them to IMMEDIATELY supply a list of offending MRNs and the NHI number which matches. Will you do that for me?
As far as I know, all the records I published are fully obfuscated so that it is impossible, even for me, to discover the PHI of any person or match the MRN with an NHI.
The records I published do not match the records of any person living or dead. Not a single one. Am I mistaken?
If Health New Zealand disagrees, kindly provide the MRN and the matching NHI identifier.
If you cannot do this, then what’s the issue?
I don’t want to harm anyone, and I’m happy to VOLUNTARILY redact any offending records, but you have provided NO EVIDENCE OF HARM.
I request that you IMMEDIATELY provide a list of offending MRNs and the associated NHI so that damages can be mitigated.
I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions. I’m in California and you can call up to 10pm PST.
Finally, 2 months ago, I published an article “An offer you can’t refuse.”
Health New Zealand took NO ACTION on my request.
If they publish the FULL data, I’m happy to remove my data as it will no longer be needed. Why did they ignore that? That’s another way to solve the problem.
I look forward to hearing from you.
-steve
P. S. Barry Young is a hero. These records prove that Health New Zealand has been KILLING people with these vaccines. Maybe you should ask them to look at the data that was leaked? I requested a meeting with their epidemiologists to explain to me why, if the vaccine is safe, the mortality curves between vaxxed and background diverge. THEY REFUSED TO DO THAT. Why would they do that unless they are HIDING SOMETHING: like the fact that the vaccines are the cause of the excess deaths of THOUSANDS of people in New Zealand. Why can’t we talk about it? I’d be happy to invite YALE PROFESSOR HARVEY RISCH to the meeting; he is one of the TOP EPIDEMIOLOGISTS in the world. WHY CAN’T WE TALK ABOUT IT?
My email to the New Zealand Employment Relations Authority
To: christchurchera@era.govt.nz Cc:Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa; Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com> Subject: [2023] NZERA 718 3266200 Health New Zealand will not comply with my request to mitigate damages. They should be ordered to supply offending MRNs Importance: High
Barry Young disclosed the information to me. I am a US journalist and published the obfuscated records on the Internet.
I told the chief executive of Health New Zealand I’d be happy to VOLUNTARILY remove any record which “would likely have significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their whanau.”
They have refused to comply with my request.
I request the ERA order them to supply me with the offending records (using the MRN record identifier) and explain how it is possible for the record to be matched to any person, dead or alive, in a way that harms that person.
All the records were obfuscated using a ONE WAY randomization algorithm so that the data for a given person cannot be identified. Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for any person to identify someone else’s record.
So a breach of PHI is IMPOSSIBLE. No one has contacted me to remove their record because nobody can find their record because it is unfindable.
They need to provide proof to the ERA that there is at least one of the 4M records published on my S3 site that could reveal PHI or could have SIGNIFICANT or IRREPARABLE consequences.
Where is that proof?
They CANNOT meet that burden.
I said I would remove any such record from my website voluntarily.
They REFUSED to identify the MRN(s) of any such records!!!
They should be ordered by the ERA to identify the MRNs of these records IMMEDIATELY to mitigate damages.
If they fail to do that, they should be held accountable for any such harm that their inaction has caused.
I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.
They refuse to engage in dialog to settle this matter.
I have NO desire to harm people, but they refuse to provide any evidence of harm.
Where is the list of MRNs to be removed and the description of the irreparable harm for each of the records requested?
They will not provide this voluntarily. THEY SHOULD BE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THIS LIST IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ANY DAMAGES CAN BE MITIGATED.
Steve Kirsch US journalist
Summary
Health New Zealand is trying to enforce an order which was obtained under false pretenses claiming that there are “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families” through the publication of the obfuscated records.
This is blatantly false.
They cannot identify a single record in the data that I publicly released that can cause “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families.” Not a single one.
What they want is to have the entire database taken down to cover their crime.
They’ve been killing people and they are unable to explain their own data.
Even top New Zealand experts can’t explain away the New Zealand data leaked by Barry Young. Epic fail every time. It’s ludicrous. For example, Janine Paynter got so pissed that I wasn’t falling for her bullshit handwaving arguments that she blocked me. Way to resolve conflict Janine! Maybe try data next time instead of nonsensical bullshit arguments?
Health New Zealand wants the public health data censored so the public won’t have the evidence to convict them of negligent homicide. It’s as simple as that.
Sorry, but I’m not going to be a party to the cover up of the crime scene.
Please share this post widely, especially if you live in New Zealand.
“We have a national security crisis: The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population.”
This is all you need to know about the “unexplained” surge in sudden deaths:
“If the sudden deaths we’re seeing were occurring in the unvaccinated, this would be on every news channel 24/7. But it’s not.”
“The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population. I blame the vaccines. If it’s not that, then what is it?
And why aren’t we talking about it?”
SHORT VIDEO AT THE LINK (from Vigilant Fox @ Substack)
They will do everything to gaslight you into believing otherwise. The one thing they won’t do is have a civil debate with me on the time-series analysis or explain to anyone how it is wrong.
Executive summary
No country has ever disclosed patient record-level data on any vaccine ever before in history.
The reason for this is not due to privacy concerns. I proved that after I released the NZ data publicly and not a single person could find their records.
The reason that governments don’t release the public health data is that it would reveal that they have been systematically killing their citizens with these “vaccines.”
Finally, one brave guy, Barry Young, an Oracle DBA at Health New Zealand, leaks the data to me. I obfuscated it to preserve privacy, and then made it publicly available for everyone to see.
Health New Zealand chief executive Margie Apa blows a fuse and has my Wasabi site taken down (so I instantly put up again at a bulletproof hosting firm) and has her chief people officer, Andrew Slater, write a note to me informing me of the orders they obtained in New Zealand. Slater conveniently fails to mention he has no jurisdiction over me. This is a scare tactic to silence me. When I ask Slater if I can talk to the epidemiologists, he ghosts me. Nice guy.
None of the leadership team at Health New Zealand is interested in the fact that their database shows they are killing New Zealanders with these vaccines. They will not let me speak to any of their epidemiologists and they won’t show me the time series analysis done by their epidemiologists for some reason. Why not? That’s the best way to silence me: just show me how I got it wrong.
Two New Zealand scientists at the University of Auckland, Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris, have viewed the leaked data, but refuse to publish their report. Nor will they explain how my analysis is wrong. They do not want to engage in any scientific discussion at all. I can’t even pay them to tell me how I got it wrong. I even offered them $250,000 to talk to me. No response. This is because the data leaked by Barry Young is a third-rail for them.
Barry Young is being charged with a crime. But the reality is that HNZ has given us a gift.
When Barry has his day in court, he gets to do something none of us have been able to do: force these people to answer the questions we’ve always wanted to know the answer to but they always refused to answer.
These are questions such as:
What reports did the epidemiologists create based on the NZ data showing the vaccine reduces all-cause mortality in New Zealand?
What investigations were made by Health New Zealand after Barry Young informed management there was a safety problem with the COVID vaccine?
How did the New Zealand epidemiologists at Health New Zealand explain the time-series analysis of the leaked data? The time-series analysis shows the vaccines increased the risk of death. If the vaccine didn’t cause this, then why were recently vaccinated people dying at a progressively higher rate than the rest of New Zealand (those of the same age). What did all these people have in common that accelerated their death if it wasn’t the vaccine?
I can’t wait.
In the meantime, here’s a very brief summary of the New Zealand data for people to chew on.
I’d be delighted to debate any of this with a qualified epidemiologist who disagrees with me, but so far no takers.
What does that tell you?
Gaslighting attempts
Lots of people will try to gaslight you into thinking the NZ data is a nothing burger.
They are wrong.
Unfortunately, none of them will go “on camera” to allow me to challenge them about their claims of missing data, no control group, under-reported deaths, it’s HVE, etc.
I have an open offer to any of them. The only rules I have are: no insults and each side gets the same amount of talk time.
Apparently, that’s too challenging for them to agree to.
This is for doses 2 through 4. Doses 2 and 4 are given when the death rate is going down. Dose 3 is given when the seasonal death rate is increasing. There are 1.7 times as many person days in the 2,4 cohort vs. the dose 3 cohort. So the slope should be going down. It doesn’t. It goes up. This is the smoking gun. Nobody can explain it. This happens in other countries as well (see this post which references S3.B in this paper as well as this article).
Mortality rate in deaths per 100K person years vs. week number since vaccine administered (x-axis). This is for doses 2 through 4. It’s “supposed” to slope down due to seasonality. The slope goes the wrong way if the vax is safe. Nobody can explain this. This is not due to the “healthy vaccinee effect” (HVE) which lasts only 4 weeks.
You can also look at Dose 4 alone. I picked everyone who got the shot in July 2022 so I could track this vs. the background deaths in NZ. The death rate goes up if you got the shot while the rest of New Zealand’s death rate is falling.
As you can see, the elderly, for which the death rate should be dramatically falling, experiences the opposite effect if they’ve been jabbed:
Pivot table analysis of people who got Dose 4 in July 2022. Their deaths per month increase when they should be decreasing.
We don’t need to get any more complicated than these two examples.
They are simply unexplainable if the vaccines are safe.
Summary
Barry Young is a hero.
Not only did he publicly expose the data that definitively shows the COVID vaccines are killing people, but he also gets to compel these epidemiologists to finally explain how I got it wrong.
I can’t wait. I’ve been pleading for qualified scientists to set me on the right path for years now with no success. They all refuse to explain the observations above (or give me bogus answers like “it’s HVE”).
It’s a shame that Barry had to be arrested for us to get answers, but it’s clear that a court hearing is simply the only way to compel qualified scientists to answer questions nowadays.
And a big thank you to Health New Zealand for having Barry arrested which will give Barry this opportunity to expose the real criminals in his court hearing. It will be epic. I can’t wait.
Musicians in US (7), Brazil (2), UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Germany (2), Italy (3), Congo, Russia, India, Vietnam, Japan; cops in US (8), Brazil, Paraguay, Spain, Italy, India, Australia; & more
John Lodge, the bass guitarist and one of the primary singers and songwriters for the Moody Blues, is recuperating from what is described as a “serious medical issue” during the Christmas holiday. A January 11, 2024, post on hisFacebook page noted he is “already well on the mend.” However, the unidentified health issue has forced the postponement of his “Performs Days of Future Passed” U.S. tour that was planned for February and March.
Note: Liz Gunn & cameraman Jonathan Clark were at the airport to greet folk from Tokelau whom they had assisted in escaping a very long lockdown in their homes because they declined the ‘safe & effective’ (links to that in the article, plus here) … EWNZ
“So to the police it’s time to reveal the footage that shows a cop who heavily assaulted me to such an extent that there were tears and pulls all around my shoulder blade, underneath my arm, right up my back. And that pain that I was in, most mornings I’ve become used to waking between 3 and 5 in the morning in very bad nerve pain.”
Today [Wednesday the 17th of January], Liz Gunn and cameraman Jonathan Clark appeared in the Manukau District Court, facing a number of charges, including an alleged assault, at Auckland Airport early last year.
Note: this case reminds me of the case against the late Graeme Sturgeon who was assaulted by security thugs at a 1080 storage site, with witnesses, then charged with assault. In court he won but was left with a fine of over $20K. Links to this case can be seen here...EWNZ
It is tempting to think of evil in apocalyptic imagery: vast and sudden demolition, a searing propulsive darkness or a blinding conflagration, the work of engineered catastrophic mayhem, in whose wake is utter smouldering demise. Yet the work of evil is often piecemeal, steady, methodical, and the accomplishment of a great wrong may well be the result of the gradual accumulative weight of small decisions, whose progress is all the surer for its studied implacability. I think of a large battalion of infantry moving painstakingly across a terrain and claiming it inch by inch until they have vanquished all. Yet, in truth, evil is varied, its manifestations as many as there are living human entities who, faced with seemingly slight or casual choices, often land on the side of self-interest, self-aggrandizement and deception. And evil, however disguised, appears in language.
NewZealandDoc’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
You will forgive me this preface as I alight on a matter that demonstrates with simple clarity a facet of the evil that has been visited upon us during the Corona War by an institution purporting to have as its charge the protection of the public weal in its regulation of medical practitioners: the infamous Medical Council of New Zealand.
On 5 December 2019, while in the employ as a psychiatrist of one of New Zealand’s District Health Boards (since amalgamated into an overarching bureaucratic entity now known as Te Whatu Ora), I received an email communication about informed consent. The document can be perused in its entirety here:
The “Updated statement on informed consent,” signed by Chief Executive Officer Joan Simeon –now, coincidentally enough, the Chair of the Federation of State Medical Board’s international arm, the International Association of Medical Regulatory Agencies – states the following:
“The key points about informed consent are:
•Every time treatment is provided, a doctor must have permission to provide that treatment. The process of obtaining that permission is called ‘informed consent’. Without informed consent, the treatment may be unlawful. To help the patient decide whether they want a treatment, they first need to be given information, such as the risks and benefits of their treatment options.
•Obtaining consent is a process of shared decision-making where a doctor helps the patient understand their medical condition and the options for treating (or not treating) that condition. It is more than signing forms and completing paperwork. As a doctor, you need to take the time to ask questions so that you understand what matters to your patient, and what their concerns, wishes, goals and values are.”
Bear in mind that this statement, meant to be a standard of good medical practice and to be used as a measure of professional conduct, appeared just as covid had been unleashed upon the world.
Then, on 28 April 2021, this very same Medical Council, in conjunction with the Dental Council, issued a guidance statement on professional responsibility and the Covid-19 vaccine (so-called), which can be found here. It was withdrawn without fanfare on 13 September 2023. It is a masterpiece of obfuscation and an inversion of true informed consent. As such, it represents one of those unheralded but highly effective acts of evil.
Guidance Statement Covid 19 Vaccine And Your Professional Responsibility
Not only are health practitioners themselves expected to get the jab, but the regulators write that “it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of antivaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners,” while simultaneously advising that “As a health practitioner, you have a role in providing evidence-based advice and information about the COVID-19 vaccination to others. You should be prepared to discuss evidence-based information about vaccination and its benefits to assist informed decision making.”
Yet when one of my colleagues undertook to provide advice to a pregnant woman about medical issues connected with the use of the Pfizer inoculation, his licence was suspended. Furthermore, given the provisional approval of the inoculation at the time and the absence of long-term safety data, the much-vaunted informed consent process and the collaborative partnership with patients implied necessitated a frank discussion of serious risk – risk that has, sadly enough, been borne out not only in New Zealand but world-wide, with an extraordinary panoply of adverse events, including death, amounting to a genocide.
With every day each of us is confronted by choice, on matters small or large. However mauled we may or may not be by spike proteins, jabs, hippocampal lesions, or the weight of the massive psychological operation played against us with covid, we retain the freedom to choose. During the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany – in an era far before viral or vaccine-mediated bioweapons were in play – ordinary people made choices, bureaucrats made choices, neighbors made choices, and a tremendous evil was allowed to grow to a horrific immensity.
Undermining a real, a true, a genuine foundational principle of Medicine – informed consent – in the service of … of following an agenda that has oppressed and is still oppressing us and destroying viable and decent Medicine in the process, is but another one of those examples of how evil wins its way in our world. The Medical Council of New Zealand, ostensible protector of public health, has in its serpentine and devious manner, shown us that it is as destructive as it is hypocritical, and as corrupt as it is authoritarian.
And those many doctors out there who knew then and now know even better about their profession need to come out of hiding, no matter how uneasy or fearful of the “authorities” they may feel.
Unless they do so a medical profession worth keeping won’t be left.
Note: see comments for an update on Sec. Austin … who seemingly was killed in Ukraine? … read & judge for yourself.Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news
“Shot Dead The Movie,” tells the heartbreaking stories of children who died after receiving COVID-19 shots
Trista was a healthy 18-year-old getting ready for college when she got a COVID-19 shot; her health began to decline shortly after, and she died three months later
In another case, 16-year-old Ernesto Junior died five days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot; he had gone to play basketball with a friend and collapsed while running across a parking lot
Baby Naomi died 11 hours after birth; her mother, Tory, received a COVID-19 shot during her first trimester of pregnancy in order to keep her job at a nursing home
Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, is a documented risk to children following COVID-19 shots; increases in miscarriages and stillbirths are also reported
“Shot Dead The Movie,” tells the heartbreaking stories of children who died after receiving COVID-19 shots. Their parents are left behind to pick up the pieces, wondering how and why a shot they were assured was safe took the lives of their children, ranging in age from newborn to 18.
While the U.K. and Denmark stopped their vaccination programs for children, U.S. health authorities continue to state adverse reactions are “rare” and the benefits of COVID-19 shots outweigh the risks of COVID-19 for children.1 Even as children are dying, no warnings have been issued to let parents know of this very real risk.
Meanwhile, parents of children who have died say they’re being given the run around from different agencies and purposely being kept in the dark.2 Board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough explains in the film:3
“The tsunami of misery, of acute respiratory infection, hospitalization, post-acute sequelae syndrome, sadly, death with the illness, and now the wave of vaccine injuries, disabilities and deaths has been crushing in terms of human despair. It has been overwhelming in terms of misery, and it has changed the course of people’s lives. Remember even the rarest side effect is meaningful when a therapy or a vaccine is applied to a giant population.”
Children’s Lives Lost Due to ‘Safe’ COVID-19 Shots
Trista was a healthy 18-year-old getting ready for college when she got a COVID-19 shot. Her health began to decline shortly after, and she died three months later.
“She woke up that morning and was complaining of not being able to breathe and that her whole body hurt, all over everywhere,” her mother says. “But she was she was a tough girl, and so she said she was gonna go lay back down and see if she could feel better. And then her sister went to check on her about 10 minutes later, and she couldn’t get her to wake up.”4
The Oklahoma Medical Examiner’s Office submitted a report to the family listing pulmonary emboli, acidosis, respiratory failure, renal failure, cardiac right ventricular failure, early myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and multiple additional maladies that were present at the time of Trista’s death, concluding her official cause of death was “undetermined.”5
In another case, 16-year-old Ernesto Ramirez Jr. died five days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. He had gone to play basketball with a friend and collapsed while running across a parking lot. According to McCullough:6
“In the case of young Ramirez, what we learned is that the heart was swollen in the setting of myocarditis, before COVID. Our guidelines say they can never exercise. If there’s myocarditis or heart inflammation, there can be no exercise, because the surge of adrenaline can stimulate the electricity to begin to have this abnormal conduction through the area of injury and circle back around.
That’s called a reentrant arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia. Ventricular tachycardia is very fast, and in a young man like this, it couldn’t be tolerated for maybe a minute or so or less.
It basically degenerates into ventricular fibrillation, which is a near flatline rhythm. And unless properly shocked at the VT or VF stage, it’s over with, and the death ultimately is a flatline death … it’s considered a sudden, arrhythmic death, a cardiac arrest, directly related to COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis …
Since his case, there have been a multitude of similar cases of death that’s occurred after COVID-19 vaccination that likely is fatal myocarditis.”
COVID-19 Shots Triggering a ‘Tsunami of Cardiovascular Issues’
McCullough says he’s seeing a “tsunami of cardiovascular issues” in his practice, including myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart. “All the regulatory agencies agree the vaccines cause myocarditis,” he says.
“There are over 200 peer-reviewed literature papers on both fatal and nonfatal myocarditis, acceleration of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart attacks and ischemic strokes, blood clots, blood clots occurring in the arteries, the veins, blood clots in a whole variety of scenarios.”7
While SARS-CoV-2 infection may promote cardiovascular disease, the risks are time-limited. “There is a risk period for heart attacks, strokes, other cardiovascular events. It’s about six weeks after an infection, that’s the risk period, of which the infection itself could provoke a cardiovascular event,” McCullough says.8 But in the case of vaccine-induced myocarditis in children, there doesn’t appear to be a time limit — permanent scarring of the heart may develop:9
“What we’ve learned, sadly, is it doesn’t go away in a matter of a few days or a few weeks. And some unlucky children, the heart develops a permanent scar. So, with a permanent scar, it’s possible in the wrong conditions, at the wrong time, everything lining up with a permanent scar, to get an abnormal heart rhythm … and have a cardiac arrest.
… So now we have children taking the COVID-19 vaccine. Some of them are developing a scar … some of the scars in children are substantial. And they don’t always feel it. They don’t feel the symptoms when they take the vaccine. They’re suffering heart damage.
They develop a myocardial scar … an unlucky child will lose their life months after taking the vaccine due to a cardiac arrest. And the underlying pathology is vaccine-induced myocarditis and myocardial scar.”
First Case of Fatal Myocarditis After COVID-19 Shot Reported in 2021
The first case of fatal myocarditis after a COVID-19 shot was reported in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2021.10
“If this happens, how come it doesn’t happen to everyone? And that’s what we’re trying to study. We’re doing careful research following the literature very carefully. As we sit here today, we are looking at billions of people worldwide who have been exposed to the virus or the vaccine or both.
Now, even if a small fraction of those individuals have a complication, a side effect or residual syndrome, that percentage, no matter how small, is a huge number of individuals,” McCullough says.11
Former Blackrock portfolio manager Edward Dowd has also pointed out “a spike in mortality among younger, working-age individuals [that] coincided with vaccine mandates. The spike in younger deaths peaked in Q3 2021 when COVID deaths were extremely low (but rising into the end of September).”12 According to Dowd:13
“There was a shift from 2020 to 21 of excess mortality from old to young. So, in 2020 it was mostly old people … The excess mortality has shifted so much that it’s pretty phenomenal … But what I find interesting and curious is as excess mortality continues and disability continues, our health authorities have no interest in trying to figure out what’s going on. There should be a national story in my mind.”
Rise in Stillbirths, Miscarriages and Fertility Problems Post-Shots
Dr. James Thorp, a maternal fetal medicine expert, and colleagues published a preprint study that found striking risks to pregnant women who received the shots, along with their unborn babies.14 The outcomes were so dire that the researchers concluded pregnant women should not receive COVID-19 shots until further research is completed.
The film shares the story of baby Naomi, who died 11 hours after birth. Her mother, Tory, received a COVID-19 shot during her first trimester of pregnancy in order to keep her job at a nursing home. Naomi was diagnosed with two serious conditions — congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a short umbilical cord, which contributed to her death. Thorp says:15
“Is there any relationship with the vaccine? … absolutely, yes. Any vaccine that causes inflammation certainly has the potential of causing any malformation because it’s crucial to the development.
Probably the foremost expert in the world, maternal fetal medicine doc, is Roberto Romero. He’s a very brilliant researcher. And he’s done research on inflammation and pregnancy for five decades … even supported by the government and the NIH … any substance that causes inflammation in pregnancy, it’s a death knell to every organ system.
It’s the most inflammatory substance that has in my experience ever occurred in the history of human beings. And when that spike protein attaches to the ACE receptor, it’s a furin cleavage site, it causes severe inflammation, severe inflammation throughout the body. It’s devastating.”
Increase in Babies Dying Prompts Nurse to Speak Out
Problems began to appear shortly after COVID-19 shots were rolled out, such that a leaked email from a large California hospital was sent out in warning to 200 nurses. The email, from September 2022, contained the subject line, “Demise Handling,” referring to an increase in stillbirths and fetal deaths. A TCW report by journalist Sally Beck shared the email’s content, which read:16
“It seems as though the increase of demise patients [babies] that we are seeing is going to continue. There were 22 demises [stillbirths and fetal deaths] in August [2022], which ties [equals] the record number of demises in July 2021, and so far in September [2022] there have been 7 and it’s only the 8th day of the month.”
One nurse who works in the neonatal ward, Michelle Gershman, had her bonus withheld because she spoke out about the rise in fetal deaths. She says:17
“Before March of 2021, we would have maybe one or two fetal demises every couple of months. And then after March of 2021, pretty much we started having one or two per week … they were basically full term and it looked like a pattern was happening.
These mothers would go to their doctor office, while full term, they’d receive a COVID vaccine. And then within like one week they’re delivering a dead baby. I kept seeing these fetal demises. I kept seeing these mothers with health problems.
I kept seeing mothers with high blood pressure issues, bleeding from their eyes, blood clots coming out of them, like all these horrific things that you would only see in a horror movie.
And this is like every time I come to work, and then I see these babies that are having severe cases of like jaundice, and they’re having respiratory issues, all these things that didn’t used to happen … And two months ago, one of the nurses told me that there were eight in one day. And then three or four weeks before that there were five in one day. So, the number has increased.”
Pfizer’s own data was also alarming, showing the shots led to a miscarriage rate of 81%, a fivefold increase in stillbirth rate, a 7.9-fold increase in neonatal death rate and a 13.7% risk of adverse complications in newborns breastfeeding from mothers who’d received a COVID-19 shot.18
Are COVID Shots the Deadliest Drug Ever?
Thorp describes the COVID-19 shot as the deadliest drug ever, citing data which the drug company, Pfizer, the CDC and the FDA tried to bury for 75 years:19
“Viewers, you can go look at it yourself. You won’t find it on the Google search engine, because it’s hidden. They don’t want you to see this, but you will find it on any other search engine. Just go to Pfizer 5.3.6, and then go to page seven. You will see in the first 10 weeks of rollout it was the deadliest drug ever known to man.
I challenge anybody watching this, as I’ve done for the last two years, to show me another drug rollout that’s had more than 1,223 dead people after the vaccine. It doesn’t exist.”
The parents in the film are among the brave few who are speaking out to raise awareness of COVID-19 shot risks. Many other are suffering silently, pressured to keep quiet about the true cause of their child’s demise. McCullough explained that from the lack of efficacy alone, the shots should be removed from the market. And the case gets even stronger when you factor in the significant number of related disabilities and deaths:20
“Multiple sources of bias created illusion that vaccines worked as they failed in the real world … claims that the COVID-19 vaccines worked to reduce spread of infection, hospitalization, and death must be rejected.
The burden of proof has not been met and threats to validity have not been overcome. All of the COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market and we should begin the investigative phase into how this massive program failed to stop COVID-19.”
A powerful starting place for waking people to their imminent danger from the deceptive jab campaign is the FACT of vaccinated people dying excessively.
Once this barrier to awareness is demolished for those still happy to trust government ‘experts’, it may be easier to alert them to the jab as the cause.
Clare Pain is an Australian investigative journalist dedicated to raising awareness of rising all cause mortality. She has worked tirelessly to expose the deadly jeopardy for the jabbed. Her end of year substack has a modest but very powerful list of 4 resources which are accessible and credible.
They comprise several videos and a free link to an expertly crafted downloadable publication from the Australian Medical Professional Society. One of the videos includes Dr Denis Rancourt, who has also a brief presentation that has gone viral here on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Once we understand that jabbed people are dying suddenly (and many more are suffering serious and long term injuries), and that the injections are by far the most likely explanation, then we may be able to prevent any more harm and bring criminal charges, if indicated, when the evidence is examined. But only if enough people raise their voices and clamour for change.
Clare’s careful and thorough work can be seen at the following sites:
Please recommend her work, and this post, to anyone who is struggling to believe that anything could be wrong with the rollout. NZDSOS has been presenting the proof – and causes – since before NZ’s jab campaign. Let’s join together and stop the carnage!
The term “conspiracy theory” was initially used by the CIA to shut down those who doubted the official line about the murder of John F. Kennedy. But it turns out that what authorities deem to be “conspiracy theories” actually end up being true more often than they would like to admit.
It seems, with respect to COVID, the term “conspiracy theory” could easily be interchanged with “spoiler alert.” This is just a shortlist. There are so much more “conspiracy theories” that ended up being true.
A real-world courage under fire situation is playing out in New Zealand. On Monday, 18 December 2023, New Zealand whistle-blower Barry Young had a second appearance in Court to answer police and Ministry of Health (MOH) charges of apparently leaking “vaccine data” on work databases. Mainstream media did not mention the relevant Protected Disclosures(Whistle-blower) Act of 2022 that is a law designed to apparently protect whistle-blowers. It leads one to believe that it provides them with immunity from prosecution when, after no results in reporting to their senior within the Department, they alert the public to what they believe to be a very serious situation.
Barry’s original interview with Liz is not linked here due to the MOH placing a (questionable) injunction on further detailed disclosure of the statistics provided by Barry, despite the fact that — since the release of those revelations — the genie is well and truly out of the bottle and has been widely shared around the world, including in the UK parliament with the UK MP Andrew Bridgen. The MOH also had New Zealanders believe they were undertaking exhaustive work to ensure the privacy of individuals was protected and anonymised. The irony of that doesn’t escape most, who are well aware that New Zealanders had to disclose their vaccine status to anyone who asked, since the experimental gene-based therapy injection arrived on our shores. No trouble with letting the supermarket , the movie theatre, or the local Mall know of such personal details when one is alive — it’s just when one dies that the information needs to be protected at all costs. Why is that? It is also unclear why the MOH are so concerned with “privacy” when the Prime Minister had already publicly confirmed that the information was anonymised.
They warn Disease X “could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.”
Klaus Schwab, the WEF, and the so-called global elites are gathering together for a 5-day annual meeting in Davos from January 15-19. One of the topics on the agenda has raised some eyeballs, “Preparing for Disease X” on January 17.
COVID has been reported to have claimed approximately 7 million lives worldwide, but “Disease X,” on the other hand, they warn, “could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.”
There is a potential for a trillion new viruses to emerge, and mutate! Ask youR friendly CDC rep for directions to the nearest quarantine camp, ahem … wellness facility. Sasha Latypova
Dr. Ben Tapper, one of the famous Disinformation Dozen, joins Paul Harrell to talk about the WEF’s “Disease X” and how we must not let them create another PLANDEMIC. Watch this new segment NOW at https://StewPeters.com
Andrew declined the invitation of course! Hear him speak about the sabotage he has experienced by those who would silence him…Andrew has blown the whistle in the UK Parliament about excess deaths and other matters of corruption for a long time (10+ yrs) and currently now has 16 other MPs on board with the excess deaths. He’s making headway. You can learn more from another interview with Liz Gunn here.
From Liz Gunn, NZ Loyal: “A New Year update with courageous UK MP Andrew Bridgen speaking about a recent strange invite from the corrupt WEF, as well as an important upcoming debate in UK Parliament next Tuesday the 16th of Jan to bring the truth about the excess deaths to the public.”
Sheffield Eagles full-back Quentin Laulu-Togaga’e “recovering from heart attack”; footballer Tom Holmes “diagnosed with rare form of cancer”; ITV soap “Emmerdale” adds cancer storyline
More celebrities sidelined dramatically in just the last few days—and a sampling of the “rare”conditions now afflicting countless tots and babies (none famous, or related to celebrities)
Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay undergoing treatment for “severe respiratory illness”
These first two items reconfirm what we (who pay attention) have unhappily observed since early 2020—that cultural rebelliousness (Stern’s raunchy humor, RATM’s loud dissidence) does not make you anti-authoritarian (if you’ve been stupefied with fear).
Though he’s never felt sicker, Stern credits the “vaccine,” without which he’d feel even worse, he thinks (if one can use that verb with so feral a Covidian).
This is why your Govt Kiwis, is your one (& only) source of truth. This is why ‘they’ don’t want you doing your own research. And why they descended on Whistleblower Barry Young like a pack of wolves instead of thanking him for his wish to save lives. If your one source of truth was actually telling you the truth about ‘very rare’ adverse reactions they would show you all the data… not scrub all evidence of it!! Neither would they have given Pfizer exemption from liability! The FDA’s long list of adverse events showed this at the outset but you weren’t allowed to cite it. (Here is FDA’s shorter list at page 17, ‘subject to change’ of course).
As the article below points out, having described the kidney damage following two doses of the ‘safe and effective’, our other organs actually fare worse than the kidneys do. You need to share this with your loved ones who still ascribe to the lies … EWNZ
From zerohedge.com
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Jan 09, 2024 – 08:00 PM
New Zealand Fudged The Data On How Kidneys Fare After COVID Vaccines
In a January 2023 preprint in The Lancet, the New Zealand government released a study showing a 70 percent increased rate of kidney injury following two doses of Pfizer mRNA vaccines. Even more telling of injury was the dose-dependent effect. That is, one dose of Pfizer showed a 60 percent increased rate of injury within three weeks post-injection, while two doses showed a 70 percent increased rate of injury three weeks post-injection. “Acute kidney injury” was not defined by the authors but is understood in a clinical setting to include measurable changes in lab results and/or serious signs and symptoms such as bleeding, pain with urination, kidney stones, nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, or other renal dysfunction.
(Flowersandtraveling/Shutterstock)
The data were drawn from a national database of over 4 million people over the age of 5 who had received the Pfizer vaccines. This number represented 95 percent of New Zealand adults and teenagers.
Compared to historical background rates of kidney injury, the following changes in acute kidney injuries were found in the original article, as shown in this screenshot.
These alarming results of vastly increased kidney injury were published in the abstract of the original article, and here are two screenshots from the January 2023 version of the abstract of that article: [1]
Now let’s zoom in on the last two sentences:
None of the above is now available online anymore, except through web archives.
The full paper does not seem to be available anymore anywhere, just the abstract, and the following is what appears when you click on the link that worked back in January:
The original full article seems to no longer be available on the internet, but I still have the above screenshots. Journalist Alex Berenson wrote a summary of the original article. [2]
Hiding the Data in New Zealand
Then a strange thing happened to the New Zealand data. Not only did the above paper disappear, but the numbers of reported acute kidney injuries were cut nearly in half. Here is what the same table now shows, from the same-titled paper, by the same authors, since August 2023, [3] at this link:
Suddenly, from January to August 2023, the observed acute kidney injury (AKI) events now are only 57 percent and 58 percent, respectively, of the originally reported AKI events. As a result, the data shown in August look like the Pfizer vaccine made no difference or even implied a slight benefit, whereas the data published seven months earlier had shown an alarming increase in acute kidney injuries postvaccine.
Also, in the August 2023 revision, the reported number of those who had received the first dose was reduced by about 100,000, and the number of those receiving the second dose was reduced by over 200,000.
During the time period of the study, Feb. 19, 2021, to Feb. 10, 2022, New Zealand had relatively low rates of COVID-19, as seen in the chart below. [4] The curve below took a vertical turn on Feb. 11, 2022, which was the day after the New Zealand government authors of the paper stopped collecting data. Until that dramatic turn, daily new confirmed COVID cases in New Zealand remained near zero.
So it is not plausible to attribute the kidney injuries seen in New Zealand post-COVID vaccines to COVID-19 infection.
The following list of kidney injuries and disorders were observed in the Pfizer clinical trials. [5] Pfizer listed the following urinary tract injuries seen in the Pfizer clinical trials in its “Appendix 1: List of adverse events of special interest.”
From the Pfizer list of over 1,200 types of injuries, I pulled out the syndromes and injuries observed in the Pfizer trials that were specifically related to, or consequent to injuries to, the kidneys, and/or syndromes and injuries that affected the kidneys more than any other organ. I found 40 such disease conditions. They are as follows:
Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome.
Urine bilirubin increased.
Urobilinogen urine decreased.
Urobilinogen urine increased.
Here is a list of 10 other injuries and syndromes observed postvaccine in the Pfizer trial that involve the kidneys but are not exclusive to them. These often affect and damage the kidneys, but I did not include them on the above list since they are not specific to the kidneys. They are as follows:
ANCA vasculitis.
Diffuse vasculitis.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
Polyarteritis nodosa.
Pulmonary renal syndrome.
Systemic lupus erythematosus.
Systemic scleroderma.
Thrombotic microangiopathy.
Type III immune complex-mediated hypersensitivity syndrome.
More than 1,200 different adverse events of special interest were observed and reported in the Pfizer clinical trials. Here is a screenshot of just those related to disorders of the glomeruli, the fine filtering units throughout the kidneys—over a half million in each kidney—that separate blood from urine:
Other Findings of Kidney Injury Post-COVID Vaccination
Post-COVID vaccine renal events were recorded in a study of 111 patients with previously biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis and two prior mRNA vaccine doses. [6]
The authors found that 22.5 percent of vaccinated patients experienced new-onset or relapse of glomerulonephritis or other renal events following COVID vaccination. Additionally, 10.8 percent had increased proteinuria, 12.6 percent had worsening hematuria, and 0.9 percent had creatinine values 150 times what is normal or worse.
No difference was found between the Pfizer-vaccinated and Moderna-vaccinated with respect to renal events.
That study did not discuss the time elapsed from vaccination to glomerulonephritis pathology. This smaller study of 13 patients found that the median time of onset was one week after the first dose and four weeks after the second dose. [7] The patients typically presented with acute kidney injury, edema, and visible blood in the urine.
Several reports of minimal change disease appear in the peer-reviewed literature. [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Most of those cases occurred within several days of receiving a mRNA COVID vaccine, usually after the second dose, sometimes after the third dose. [15] It has also been seen following the AstraZeneca COVID vaccine. [16]
Minimal change disease is not one of the conditions noted in the Pfizer adverse events list. It is an insidious kidney disorder that is so named for the very subtle changes in the glomeruli filtration, which leaves gaps in filtration. Nephrotic syndrome results, in which proteins leak through the gaps from the blood into the urine, and then systemic effects of hypoproteinemia result.
Other kidney diseases observed following COVID vaccination include the following:
Visible blood in the urine (hematuria) within hours after vaccination. [17]
Membranous nephropathy. [18]
Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. [19]
ANCA glomerulonephritis. [20]
ANCA vasculitis. [21]
IgA nephropathy in children. [22]
Magnetic resonance urography is shown below in an MRI image of the kidneys and proximal ureters (photo from OHSU).
We can appreciate in the above photo that the fan shape of a kidney allows lots of surface area peripherally for maximum fine filtration of blood to urine, and the collecting ducts gather centrally toward the minor calyces, major calyces, and then finally, the renal pelvis, to effectively drain off urine with downward flow, gravity-assisted. Hence the fanned “kidney bean” shape.
If You Think the Kidneys Were Hit Hard . . .
After an extensive review of the medical literature over the last three years, since the onset of mass COVID vaccination campaigns, I can say with confidence that the medical literature reveals many fewer victims of kidney injuries following these vaccines than of other types of bodily injuries. Other bodily organs have fared far worse than the kidneys for most of the victims. Most notable and now well-known are the myocarditis and other cardiovascular injuries, for which I described the mechanisms of injury and the ubiquity among the COVID-vaccinated population, [23] as well as brain injuries, [24] among others.
Future vaccines must be screened thoroughly for risk to kidneys and other organs before use in adults, and then only with fully detailed and uncoerced informed consent. Clearly, such toxic products as mRNA injections must never be used in children at all and must never be made a condition of work or study for anyone.
[2] A Berenson. URGENT: A big New Zealand study reveals high rates of kidney injury after the Pfizer jab. Jan 26 2023. Unreported Truths.
[3] M Walton, V Pletzer, et al. Adverse events following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aug 9 2023. Drug Saf. 46 (9): 867-879. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10442303/
[8] V D’Agati, S Kudose, et al. Minimal change disease and acute kidney injury following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Kidney Int. May 15 2021. 100 (2). 461–463. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.035. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123374/
[17] L Negrea, B Rovin. Gross hematuria following vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in 2 patients with IgA nephropathy. Jun 2021. Kidney Int. 99 (6). 1487. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987498/
[18] N Chavarot, M Padden, et al. De novo posttransplant membranous nephropathy following BNT 162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in a kidney transplant recipient. Dec 2022. 22 (12). 3188-3189. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537991/
[19] N Morimoto, T Mori, et al. Rapidly progressive IgA nephropathy with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis-like lesions in an elderly man following the third dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: a case report. Apr 24 2023. BMC Nephrol.. 24 (1). 108. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37095451/
[21] M Shakoor, M Birkenbach, et al. ANCA-Associated vasculitis following Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Oct 2021. Am J Kidney Dis. 78 (4). 611-613. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34280507/
[22] C Hanna, L Herrera Hernandez, et al. IgA nephropathy presenting as macroscopic hematuria in 2 pediatric patients after receiving the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Sep 2021. Kidney Int. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8256683/
The data showed the vaccines were causing kidney injury. So the data magically changed when the paper was submitted for publication. The paper also showed >25X higher risk of myocarditis post vax.
ADDITIONAL RELATED LINKS FROM READER Siberian Mongoose:
The earliest and most archived that i can find (also on archive.is) is the abstract from 2023-01-21:
which gives a 404; and i can‘t find it on Sci-Hub either (more likely to be found there if not open access). However the 13-page ”peer reviewed” paper from 2023-08-09 is otherwise easy to find, for example:
A pro-vaccine doctor who administered thousands of shots has decided to blow the whistle and alert the public about a “major cover up” of “devastating side effects” including cancer and cardiac arrest caused by the Covid mRNA injections.
The article “Pro-Vax Doctor Blows Whistle, Warns Public About ‘Major Cover Up’ of ‘Devastating Side Effects’ was originally published by the People’s Voice.
Dr. Cornelia Tschanett, who administered approximately 4,000 shots in her practice, experienced a moral dilemma after noting that around ten percent of her patients reported adverse reactions following their vaccinations.
Driven by a disturbing incident where a healthy teenager she vaccinated experienced sudden heart failure, Dr. Tschanett reached a point where she felt unable to “continue to vaccinate here.”
Rather than continuing with vaccinations, she has chosen to share her concerns openly, challenging the prevailing narrative that the Covid mRNA shots are unequivocally “safe and effective,” as asserted by governments and their media allies.
According to Dr. Tschanett, there are thousands of other doctors who share her observations regarding the vaccine, however they are terrified of losing their jobs and careers and being punished by Big Pharma if they dare to speak out about their concerns.
Dr. Tschanett’s story is now part of a recently released documentary titled “UN-SICHTBAR: Der Film Teil 1” (translated as “INVISIBLE: The Film Part 1”). In the film, she reveals that a staggering 10 percent of the 4,000 patients she treated have reported “problems since the vaccination.”
“There were few side effects, as we saw at the beginning.”
However, Dr. Tschanett reveals that her patients kept returning with side effects long after they received the vaccinations.
“This slowly became more the case over the course of the year,” she continued. “You may not notice the first cases that much or dismiss it as an isolated case.”
“Towards the end of the year, this increased. Then more and more people came with supposed complaints after the vaccination. And then you question your own perception a bit.”
Dr. Tschanett revealed that she and other doctors were afraid to express their concern about the safety of the shots.
The total lack of scientific discourse around the excess deaths and vaccine side effects is the most shocking aspect of this whole story for Dr. Tschanett.
“People report the same complaints, such as cardiac arrhythmias, insane fatigue, persistent muscle pain, and nerve inflammation. This then slowly became reproducible. And then, of course, you also try to look for scientific discourse.”
“And that was shocking to me that that wasn’t possible.”
Tschanett revealed that when she tried to raise the issue with other doctors and pharmaceutical company officials, she was warned to keep her mouth shut.
“It was actually an absolutely dogmatic and certain and rock-solid statement: ‘This is not from the vaccination.’
“And the more patients came, the greater the inner conflict became for me — and for many doctors who actually want the best for their patients.”
Dr. Tschanett explained that she decided to blow the whistle about what is really happening behind the scenes after a healthy teenage patient became seriously ill following his vaccination.
“[Extraordinarily], the first case was a 16-year-old boy who arrived at us 48 hours after the second dose with nausea and chest pressure,” she recalled.
“I took an EKG, and the EKG was impressively changed — so not normal for a 16-year-old. We then sent him to the hospital. A massive myocarditis of the heart was diagnosed there. Thank God he got well again.”
“But that was the moment when I really stopped.Because people come at the same time, mothers with their children, young people,” she continued.
“They have literally said the sentence very often, ‘I don’t know what’s right, I put my life in her hands.’
“And this power of trust induces an enormous responsibility for me personally to be honest. It makes no difference whether you have seen this case once or ten times. The risk exists; the connection is vacant.”
“Until proven otherwise, we actually have to educate people about what we see and what experiences we have. A person has this right if he or she decides to undergo physical intervention.”
Tschanett explains that she experienced enormous pressure from government and Big Pharma to “vaccinate as many people as possible” with the experimental Covid mRNA injections.
“That was an inner conflict for me because the social pressure to vaccinate as many people as possible and to vaccinate all age groups was very great,” she said.
“And on the other hand, personal experience as a doctor has increased — that this is not possible without side effects.”
“That was the moment when I thought to myself, I can’t continue to vaccinate here. I have to stick to the truth; I have to live up to this trust.”
“We must have had 300-400 people who have come to us with the feeling that they have had problems since the vaccination.”
A thank you to Mark Crispin Miller @ Substack who is methodically compiling those unexplained events lamestream is brushing under the proverbial rug …EWNZ
Brazilian rapper hospitalized, F1 driver’s cardiac arrest, journo’s heart attack; German footballer’s “serious health condition”; Italian hospital director (pro-vax) has a heart attack; & much more
Guatemalan pop star Ricardo Arjona, German TV journalist Dunja Hayali both retire; Piers Morgan tests positive for “Covid,” blames the un-jabbed; NZ actor Martin Henderson’s “scary” illness; more
Dan Picknell, also blowing the whistle, was previously interviewed by Liz Gunn at FreeNZ. Hear him at this link
Dan talks here in this interview with Barry Young … hear their thoughts on this entire scenario. The shocking data that the NZ Govt is continuing to debunk whilst promoting still the notorious ‘safe & effective’.
A point to note, Dan speaks early in the interview about how the Police force has changed. This resonates with revelations from another former Snr Detective who communicated with me a few years back. You can read about that here and here.
It was already dead … given NZ is a corporation, not democratically elected … a corporation’s loyalty is to its shareholders every time … EWNZ
From nzdsos.com
In her recent interview with Paul Brennan on Reality Check Radio, Nadine Connock connects the dots between New Zealand’s vaccine data whistleblower, and the New Zealand government’s Pfizer contract.
Nadine has an academic background in international relations, politics and development, and international humanitarian law.
Terminated from her job teaching English to refugees and migrants due to the Covid-19 vaccine mandates, she states that she quickly recognised “a very clear playbook script of power and corruption“. With the intent to bring rational discussion into a chaotic and distressing time for New Zealanders trying to navigate “a highly orchestrated operation“, she authored the following two articles which were published in the Daily Telegraph New Zealand:
Referencing the Pfizer contract with the Brazilian government, Nadine explains the relevance to New Zealand when our own Pfizer contract is unavailable for public scrutiny. In order to rollout the products rapidly, Pfizer used standardised templates in their contracts with all governments.
The indemnity clause in the leaked Pfizer contract with Brazil states “Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, [and] each of their affiliates … from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses … caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the vaccine …”. Read more about the leaked Brazilian contract here, including the use of sovereign assets as collateral to guarantee indemnity.
Nadine concludes that the indemnity clause is the reason our government authorities have acted so aggressively and unjustly towards Barry Young, who should in fact be protected by specific whistleblower laws. She discusses the illegal laws passed in order to allow authorities to violate usual and expected protections, likely for the purposes of safeguarding the Pfizer contract. She specifies four New Zealand agencies requiring investigation for dubious decisions apparently connected to financial incentives: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI), Medsafe and Worksafe.
She also names specific individuals who violated due diligence, including but not limited to Ayesha Verrall as previous Minister of Health. The Medical Council of New Zealand get a special mention for the pressure they placed on clinicians to transgress basic medical ethics.
Having studied and lived in failed states around the world, Nadine concludes that New Zealand is currently not a functioning democracy and suggests our national assets were likely signed over as collateral for Pfizer’s indemnity. She refers to the 2009 criminal case against Pfizer and contemplates how the fraud which has been executed against New Zealanders might be used in legal cases to negate the Pfizer contract. Court cases which do not involve protecting Pfizer, such as human rights violations caused by lockdowns, are winning in court, whereas breaches involving Pfizer are very hard to win, which appears related to the Pfizer contract.
An inquiry must involve investigating whether the advisory boards, task forces, and disciplinary groups involved in suppressing citizens’ rights were part of the framework to protect Pfizer against liability. Is our current national debt part of a controlled economic demolition through the waiver of sovereign immunity? Is the dismantling of indigenous rights occurring across the globe related to these rights providing a level of protection? Protected assets cannot be sold as collateral.
Barry Young’s whistleblower case would normally be an employer dispute, but because his data leak breaches the indemnification clause in the Pfizer contract, it seems that he must be aggressively silenced and prosecuted. Nadine also suggests that New Zealand is a good testing ground for the globalists with regards to how future data breaches may be dealt with by observing the public, judiciary and government responses.
NZDSOS has long drawn attention to the ‘supra-sovereign’ status of the Pfizer contract, at whose feet the entire edifice of government, its institutions, the police, regulators and judiciary have fallen. Deaths and injuries are ignored, dissenters are punished and life-saving early treatments are suppressed. The lawyer who led the national surrender to this contract, Simon Watt, is now the deputy chair of the Medical Council, in a clear illustration of the triumph of corporate control over medical ethics and public safety.
We highly recommend the interview with Nadine Connock for a New Zealand context. For a global context, her information dovetails well with that of former Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ramesh Thakur, in this recent interview with Jan Jekielek, in which he describes the use of regulatory bodies to suppress dissent against the biosecurity state.
The solution comes when enough active dissent overpowers the regulators’ capacity for control, and shifts public attention to listen to those being silenced. We encourage all medical, health and legal professionals who are aware that something is very wrong, to join forces with us and speak out, if not for yourself, then for your children and the future of this country.
You must be logged in to post a comment.