The Detailed Case of Garrett Utting: New Zealanders Have No Protections, Are Being Lied To, and Our Systems are Not Fit For Purpose
The following is the story of Garrett Utting.
He was 30 years old when he died in December 2021. He was young and healthy with only a history of galactosaemia which required a strict dairy free diet. He was on no medication.
He did not want to be vaccinated as he was well and at minimal risk from a serious outcome. He had no co-morbidities and was fit and active in a physical job outdoors.
His father initially supported his decision not to get the jab as he was healthy and the long-term effects were unknown, but he was also concerned that Garrett might lose his newfound employment and cadetship in horticulture and didn’t want him to put his career in jeopardy. He had already lost one job due to lockdowns. He suggested Garrett wait and see what his employer wanted and go from there. Unfortunately, his employer followed the government advice and required employees to be vaccinated even though the bulk of his work was outside by himself in the orchards and vineyards.
Garrett reluctantly got vaccinated on 13 Nov 2021. He did not complain to anyone of symptoms but would not have been likely to do so. He did call in to work to say he needed a day or two off on 3 Dec 2021 due to feeling tired, fatigued and needing to rest.
“We have seen Liz Gunn’s recent video discussing information shared with her by a whistleblower.
We have not seen the information Liz Gunn discusses though we are not surprised by the allegations. For over 2.5 years we have been discussing, attempting to bring attention to, and asking for an investigation of serious adverse events and deaths potentially caused by covid vaccination.
We have struggled to have confidence that our authorities are assessing these events and deaths thoroughly as our questions have been either ignored or answered superficially. We have also seen evidence that post vaccination deaths and adverse events have not been adequately investigated by CARM/Medsafe/pathologist/Coroner. We are seeing suggestions of evasion and cover-up, especially through analysis of Official Information Act responses.
We agree with Liz Gunn that there are at least hundreds of dead and tens of thousands of injured (many seriously and likely permanently) New Zealanders due to the covid injection.
We were aware:
that the government wrote in Feb 2021 that it was expecting 1.1 % of vaccinees to have a serious adverse event that would necessitate time off work,
that Medsafe only expect 5% of adverse events to be reported,
that Medsafe usually expects 3000-5000 reports per year for ALL medicines,
that in the first year of covid vaccination there were over 58,000 reports for ONE medicine,
that there were 3,688 SERIOUS adverse events documented in Medsafe’s final Safety Report at the end of November 2022 when they stopped reporting numbers publicly,
that there have been over 13,000 serious adverse events reported according to an OIA response from April 2023.
We have presented a list of dead New Zealanders to authorities on more than one occasion.
We have asked the police to investigate the deaths of children and young people.
We have been met with dismissals, best summarised as deferring back to Medsafe’s assertions of safety.
We have documented the list of letters (with links to each letter) we have written. If the letters have been replied to, the reply is posted as well when it was received. We have written over 60 letters.
We suggest that you at least glance at the list of letters if not read them in full to see how hard we have tried to get action to protect New Zealanders from harms caused by the injection. This includes contacting the police and asking for an urgent investigation into potential contamination in the vaccine vials discovered in late 2021. The latest evidence of actual contamination is posted here, an urgent expert convention at the World Council for Health.
On 24 May 2022 we posted an open letter which was sent to every MP on 3 June 2022. This letter contained a list of New Zealanders whose deaths had (closely) followed covid vaccination. The names were changed but they were all real people and circumstances. (That list is now larger, more children and young people being added).
On 2 June 2022 our lawyer sent a letter directly to the Police Commissioner requesting an urgent investigation into the deaths of 150 named New Zealanders within a month of vaccination, many occurring within 1-2 days.
A dismissive response was received on 15 July 2022 stating that the Police “do not accept the views expressed by NZDSOS and do not intend to respond by way of an investigation of Medsafe or other agencies involved in the administration of the covid-19 vaccine”.
On 18 Jul 2022 our lawyer wrote a second letter to the Director for Police Legal Services, Mr Bill Peoples. We did not receive a reply.
On 10 August 2022 we contacted police again with our request for them to investigate suspicious deaths of named children. On 5th Sept we received a reply stating that they would not be investigating child deaths and would not be providing further information.
We have just sent a further updated open letter summarising the latest scientific evidence of harms. Remember, all the supposedly reassuring data is irrelevant and should be side-lined if evidence of harm emerges.
It is our opinion, consistent with that of Liz Gunn, that members of the recent New Zealand parliament knew of the potential harms and knowingly allowed this new technology to be released upon the public, in many cases insisting that it be used. All 120 members of the former parliament have been informed on multiple occasions of the harm being done to the population and the science to back up our assertions. Not one of them has acted to protect New Zealanders.
We have been urging the public to get involved and ask questions and demand answers because we, and our serious concerns, have been ignored. Following our own, and Liz Gunn’s lead, New Zealanders en masse MUST demand an investigation into the dead and injured victims of the contaminated covid injection.
If this does not occur, the harm will continue and potential solutions will not be addressed.
Are the new Covid 19 vaccines SAFE? That’s the primary question for so many “vaccine hesitant” or downright “NO” potential recipients. As Operation Warp Speed raced Covid vaccines to market in record time, millions of people are receiving vaccines that are still collecting data on safety and efficacy for the next two years! Quietly, while you may have been wrapped up in your own safety research, several countries have changed their legislation regarding the release of NEW Covid 19 vaccines, designed to counter the burgeoning “variant” (e.g. mutated) strains.Canada, UK, America, Australia, Singapore and Switzerland will now all allow a fast track process for these new vaccines to be used on the general public
WITHOUT FIRST SHOWING EVIDENCE OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS.
Yes you heard me right. It seems that taking the (deemed unnecessary) time to determine that the vaccines will not injure or kill recipients….or that they do indeed work…will take too long and allow covid variants too much time to break away. Instead, the safety record of the currently used Covid vaccines can be used to judge the safety of the new ones, the countries’ regulatory agencies declare. Remember the current vaccines are deemed “Safe and effective”…despite the thousands of vaccine injury horror stories you can access on social media every day.
Based on the existing rubber stamp “safe and effective”, modifications of these vaccines will not require full clinical trials. Rather than full clinical trials, only a small amount of data needs to be put together by the manufacturers prior to seeking an EUA. Then after the EUA is granted further data can then be gathered from people in the general population who are given the vaccines.
Excerpt: “It is important to recognize that the Pfizer Covid vaccine has not been approved by the FDA. It has only received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) meaning the vaccine has not gone through the standard process to get official approval from the regulatory agency.” Spiro Skouras
The Pfizer Covid vaccine is already being administered to the public in the UK and the first doses have been given in the US ahead of a mass vaccination campaign on a global scale. It is important to recognize that the Pfizer Covid vaccine has not been approved by the FDA. It has only received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) meaning the vaccine has not gone through the standard process to get official approval from the regulatory agency. Now Moderna’s experimental Covid vaccine is set to get the same Emergency Use Authorization allowing the shot to be distributed to millions of people. We have already witnessed short term adverse events (side effects) from the Pfizer vaccine. Truth is, nobody knows what the long term effects could be and it appears the public is being subjected to an experiment on a global scale. In this report, we examine discrepancies in the FDA Moderna report that was voted on by an advisory panel. The panel voted 20-0 recommending EUA. Some of the discrepancies include cherry picked trial participants to achieve the desired results to gain EUA. As well as 13 total deaths in the trials, 6 in the vaccinated group and 7 in the placebo. Something the media refuses to address. Show Notes: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/…
This site is a community project by New Zealanders who do not want to see our copper landline infrastructure, which will function in a power blackout to be allowed to be run down or destroyed.
A corded phone that is connected to the copper landline network is a lifeline to emergency services if a storm or other event causes widespread power outages since this type of phone will work even if your home has no power.
The copper landline phone system allows people to choose to have a safe corded home phone.
This is particularly important in households with children given that their developing brain may be more vulnerable to adverse effects from cordless or cellular phones.
We hope that you will support our online petition which you will be able to to access via the link below:
Please join us
Your voice in defence of our copper landline network and your taking the time to help educate others about the importance of this important national infrastructure. If you would like to volunteer to help with this campaign, please contact us via the Contact Form. Thank you.
NOTE: This article cites a press release FROM 2010 that is no longer available. You can however read more about Merck’s knowledge of the possible reactions, including the very short time they tested it with the very small number of ‘guinea pig’ humans in this article by Dr Mercola…
What other explanation is there for a comment in Truth About Gardasil’s latest press release which stated: A medical source close to TAG (Truth about Gardasil) has stated: “I find it disturbing that Merck’s agreement with the FDA is based on an agreement that no adverse events will be labeled as such unless there is a TWO fold increase seen of diseases that occur at least as frequently as 1/10,000. This takes away all of the rare autoimmune demyelinating syndromes that cause blindness, paralysis and death.” ? Maybe they are lying? Nope. I managed to obtain documentation as to the whats and why’s and I’m satisfied that the comment is an accurate report.
Truth About Gardasil also mentioned that since that particular press release, Merck has repeatedly be crawling all over their website like infuriated bees to honey in a famine.
Interesting, isn’t it, that MERCK would have such an agreement with FDA. Sounds to me like a game of “we pretend to chase you, and you pretend to follow the rules.” Which in turn, reminds me of the Italian MOB’s relationship with Italian Police.
Interesting too that FDA would set up a meeting with TAG, and there would be silence ever since. One wonders though, what is going on behind the scenes, because the Gardasil bubble just might explode some time soon. Is the silence from FDA and Merck, yet another attempt to come out with another 10 retrospective studies to murky the waters, and placate the masses?
It was interesting that Dr Michael Tatley from CARM would so blithely state in North and South’s rabidly provaccine monologue in June, words to the effect that vaccines couldn’t possible cause the problems that the anti vaccine lobby said, because CARM never saw evidence of it.
So long as doctors continue to deny reactions ever happen, and refuse to report them, you won’t see them, unless parents report them. Many parents are scared to report reactions, because of what their doctors will say. I have quite a few Gardasil reactions which have as yet, not been reported to you, because the parents are not in any space to do so. In terms of the medical profession, no they won’t “see” them, for two reasons. First, they are blind, and if you deny something is happening, you can’t treat it, and if you actually look at it, and see it, you would realise that the medical profession has nothing to treat any of the current Gardasil reactions with anyway. Unless you count in a swathe of girls who’ve never had seizures before, being put on seizure medication any time after the first Gardasil injection.
When are CARM and the MOH going to get real about accurate data collection, huh?!!! Oh, silly me. I forgot. If you don’t have the data, then you can truthfully say that your data shows there are no problems.
Spiro Skouras
Environmental Health Watch NZ 
You must be logged in to post a comment.