I'm for justice and equity for all peoples everywhere. I am also for exposing lies and corruption, particularly the lies of the corporations that have a tight grip on humanity, all for profit and control. A grip that has been instrumental in the rape and pillage of indigenous peoples planet wide, for centuries.
Similarly, most Kiwis remain unaware that Luxonās participation in the Microsoft CEOs Summits in the mid-2010s, as well as his invitation to a $13,000 dinner with former US President Barack Obama numbering 13 mortals, and his subsequent selection as Chairman of the inaugural Prime Ministerās 13-member Business Advisory Council ā were chess plays in political grooming to become a ārookā.
The grand chessboard game involves inflicting āmanaged conflictā with the application of a āHegelian Dialecticā social engineering to cause clashes between two opposing ideologically-driven forces, so that a āsynthesisā, or a desired final solution, is created. The idea is to use the crises to forge a fusion of capitalism and communism to control populations. This hybrid system is techno-feudalism.
After Luxon moved into the political realm by standing as a National Party candidate in the 2020 election, the former Air New Zealand CEO appeared to undergo a āpilot testā to see how he weathered a fleeting āscandalā. In February 2021, a business unit at Air NZ was found to have performed maintenance work for the Saudi Royal Navy, while Luxon was CEO. The media treated Luxon with kid gloves, while PM Jacinda Ardern named Price Waterhouse Coopers as auditor, and called a snap three-day lockdown for Auckland (city of Air NZās HQ), due to only three cases.
Former MÄori Television editor, Steve āSnoopmanā Edwards locates Luxonās recent rhetoric that āthe wealthy arenāt the problemā with triangulated lenses comprised of scholarship that surveys oligarchic coalitions, who transform economic wealth into political power. By American standards, Luxonās $4 million annual salary while captaining Air New Zealand placed him at the threshold of oligarch status.
Crucially, oligarchs can only exist in societies with extreme wealth disparities, and they thrive in crisis-ridden societies. Ergo, the super-wealthy cause crises, including poverty.Super-rich oligarchs convert their concentration of economic wealth into political power, which is why oligarchies canāt be undone by democratic procedures.
So, you’ve watched How BlackRock Conquered the World and you’re now aware of how this financial behemoth with trillions of dollars of assets under management has taken over vast swaths of the economy. You know how BlackRock is one of the top institutional investors in seemingly every major Fortune 500 company, and you understand how Fink and the gang are leveraging this incredible wealth to wield political and social power, directing industry and ultimately steering the course of civilization.
And since you did watch that podcastumentary to the very end, you’ll also remember how I pointed out that the top institutional investor in most of these companies is not BlackRock, but The Vanguard Group.
Bill Gates is suddenly changing his tune and appears to be abandoning the āclimate doomā Narrative just as more people see through the climate change faƧade and realize how theirĀ lives are being exploited by globalism.
āGates, author of āHow to Avoid a Climate Disaster,ā spent the last decade warning audiences that the world is overpopulated and subject to impending climate doom. In order to save the planet, Bill Gates says we must achieve āzero net carbon emissions by the year 2050.
Meanwhile, Gates continues to traverse the world in his private jets, spewing more carbon emissions in one year than the average person does in their entire lifetime,ā says Lance D Johnson from NewsTarget who authored the following article.
Bill Gates Suddenly Abandons Climate Doom Narrative as Populations Push Back Against Globalism
As more people see through the climate change faƧade and realize how their lives are being exploited by globalism, Bill Gates is suddenly changing his tune on the climate doom narrative. During a live speaking event at the Times Center in New York, Gates made a sudden U-turn on his climate doom narrative. He said, āNo temperate country is going to become uninhabitable.ā
Gateās latest comments are in stark contrast to the public comments he made just two years ago when his book on climate doom was first published. In a 2021 Fox News Sunday interview with Chris Wallace, Bill Gates said, āThe migration that we saw out of Syria for their civil war, which was somewhat weather dependent, weāre going to have 10 times as much migration because the equatorial areas will become unlivable.ā
Now he suddenly believes the opposite is true, and itās easy to see why he is softening his stance.
As I always recommend, watch the doco The Corporation – this was my big eye opener as to why all the corruption now. Their bottom line is profit… and lying is their acceptable norm. It is on our ‘corporations’ page. Find it on YT… they also have a website. Essential viewing IMO… EWNZ
Some critics assume that drug companies suddenly became ācrookedā and ādishonestā with the production of the covid 19 āvaccines.ā But thatās not true. Dr. Vernon Coleman first exposed the drug companies in a book published nearly half a century ago.
Drug company staff have been deceitful, misleading and dangerous for decades and the industry has been institutionally corrupt and devious for many, many years.
One way to subvert these hellish “exercises” is to make the world aware of them beforehand
On September 20, I wrote a post highlighting a video by one Jason Shurka, warning that a 5G signal could be broadcast worldwide on October 4 (or, failing that, October 11), with what may well be an apocalyptic purpose.
Expose-news.com is constantly under threat of closure … remember Kiwis JA is still intent on the same censorship push going forwards, shutting down truth by calling it hate speech. This is global … remember the lockstep. The ‘safety’ term is laughable. Like the ‘safe & effective’ that isn’t … EWNZ
The article: “Rumble, the free-speech video hosting website could be banned in the UK under new online safety laws. As reported here a couple of days ago, the Online Safety Bill was approved by the House of Lords on the 19th of September but still needs official approval from the King before it can become law. This has not deterred the government from trying to coax platforms such as YouTube, to ban Russell Brand due to allegations of historical abuse.
Again as we reported last week, while YouTube dutifully obeyed, Rumble stayed true to their mission and responded āAlthough it may be politically and socially easier to join the cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our companies values and mission. and finished with āWe emphatically reject the UK Parliamentās demands.ā
Unfortunately, now āexpertsā have said that Rumble, which hosts Russell Brand, could be blocked in the UK because of the Online Safety Bill.”
EWNZ note: Since posting this this morning I see a post on topic from Prof Mark Crispin Miller (NYU) so am adding it for your perusal. He strongly recommends watching it:
The first thing too realize is that plants will take up any minerals or elements that are in the growing medium along with any chemicals.
For instance you avoid growing vegetables next to an older house as there is a likelihood of lead in the soil from lead paints used in the past on the house.
This is even more so for any root crops such as potatoes or carrots because roots store more of the lead than the foliage.
I read also that in old gold fields that planting of big rooting plants such as hemp can be used to take up the minuet gold particles and then later extracted from the mature plant.
This morning I read the latest newsletter from Guy Hatchet in which he says:
As you know, public health is my major concern. Little is possible without robust health.
So the most important question is what alternatives are available to solve the public health crisis?
Our political leaders and the nationās medical administrators have fallen short of explaining to the public what has gone down,
not so much during the pandemic but post pandemic Āwhat is happening now.
The long wait lists for surgery and the appalling response times for emergency treatment are not so much a reflection of a health service in disarray,
but primarily the result of a massive increase in illness among the general population.
Heart disease, cancers, strokes, reproductive health issues, neurological illness, mental health episodes,
immunological deficiencies, disability, and excess mortality have been increasing at rates never seen
before. We have repeatedly reported on these. For example the rate of hospitalization for heart disease has increased by 83% and strokes by 40%.
None of these frightening developments have been mentioned during the election campaign.
Guy goes on to suggest: According to scientific studies, what really can improve health outcomes?
Food
Improving diet is a powerful approach.
Many studies show that the benefits of fresh fruit and vegetables for health are not only significant but they are very large studies.
Research published in 2015, with 150,000 participants over 32 years found that vegetarians live longer. Even a tiny 3 per cent increase in protein from plants led to a huge 12 per cent drop in risk of death from cardiovascular-related disease.
A study published by the BMJ found:
āParticipants with Covid-19 who reported following āplant-based dietsā and āplant-based diets with pescatarian elementsā had 73% and 59% lower odds of moderate-to-severe COVID-19 severity, respectively, compared with participants who did not follow these diets.ā
I replied back to Guy with the following: Hi Guy
Yes you are right about diet being the key to better health outcomes but produce commercially grown found in supermarkets is not healthy food with good nutritional values; it is unhealthy, force grown and containing numerous chemicals from sprays and fertilizers.
For instance NZFSA in one of their past analysis of food found 23 different chemicals in cucumbers tested; these were from sprays used to protect from diseases and insect pests.
That was one of the worst cases but most others also had too many chemical poisons in the produce.
Commercially grown produce is also relatively tasteless when compared to naturally home grown vegetables, which are delicious to eat and brimming full of minerals and nutrients.
Organic grown is half the answer as it removes the chemical poisons but it does not necessary increase the nutritional values and taste.
The simple test is if the produce tastes really good then it has great health values and you do not need to eat much to feel satisfied. Regards Wally Richards
I believe that most readers of my columns already know these aspects and hence do grow as much of their own food chain as possible and have better health outcomes as a result, for them and their families.
Putting the goodness into the soil so the plants take it up will not only increase the goodness of the food but the taste will be that much better as well.
We have two products which are from the ocean one of which is Wallys Ocean Solids containing all the known minerals and elements of which there are 114 there of.
Lightly applied to the soil or occasionally diluted and sprayed over the foliage of your plants it will increase the health and goodness of your vegetables.
Then there is our special fertilizer made from the fish of the sea: Bio Marinusā¢ which is manufactured by the enzymatic hydrolysis of fish offal, blended with humate, seaweed and biology including Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma, mycorrhizae fungi etc, together with gibberellic acid which promotes growth.
Designed to provide a high quality, cost effective fertilizer.
Use at 30ml per litre of non chlorinated water for soil drench and feeding plants.
15ml per litre of non chlorinated water for foliage spray.
Biologically active soils have the ability to retain moisture and release nutrients ensuring greater production, faster rotation and more rapid recovery from stress.
To build a healthy biological soil we need products that can feed living organisms.
Soil health and soil fertility requires much more than NPK fertilizer.
Without the right biology, plants and animals cannot reach their full potential.
Biology is essential for the recycling of nutrients and the fixing of atmospheric nitrogen.
Bio Marinusā¢ is produced in Christchurch made with fish from our Southern Oceans and available in one litre containers for the home gardeners.
These we have had the privilege to promote for a few years.
The company has focused its products to the commercial growers and have given me the rights to decant and relabel the product.
Which soon will be labeled as Wallys Fish Fertiliser.
The cost savings of us doing the product has reduced the retail price down by $2.00 to $16.00 a litre.
We also can now supply garden shops with a wholesale price so they can offer their customers the best fish fertilizer in NZ brimming full of goodness and microbes for your gardens.
The product is suitable to add Magic Botanic Liquid (MBL) to the spray but as there is life microbes in the fish fertilizer you need to use it soon after adding or otherwise do not seal the cap as the microbes can grow their populations and balloon the plastic container.
You can use this to advantage by placing the fish fertilizer into a bucket of non chlorinated water and then add some molasses to the brew and grow over night your own billions of beneficial microbes to add to the soils of your garden.
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:
1The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)
2The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)
3The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)
4The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)
Ā Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion. This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)
WEF Orders Governments To Prepare for BILLIONS of ‘Social Credit Prisonersā
The CRIME of Wrong Think Black Listed
The World Economic Forum has been quietly granted backdoor access to billions of cellphones as part of a plot to compile āblacklistsā of users who hold āpolitically incorrectā views and commit āwrong speakāā¦
Note: they are NOT elite. Long before our contemporaries, NZ school teacher Barry Smith traveled for three decades from the 1970s, firstly NZ wide, then world wide, lecturing from his research into these parasitic people who want a one world dictatorship, waking people and linking to the Biblical prophecies regarding end times. Of course he was ridiculed as a conspiracy theorist… meanwhile most of what he foretold is coming completely true. The full interview from which this clip was taken can be seen on our One World Govt / New world order pages (main menu). He was interviewed in the UK. His books on topic can still be found (see his family website or search the 2nd hand book sites). You can still find his videos on YT although they seem harder to find… EWNZ
If you enjoy our posts, check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is
As predicted, the fledgling “freedom” parties are self-destructing. This was inevitable, since history tells us the time, cost, and complexity of infrastructure needed to build a political party from scratch is almost insurmountable: It takes many years and millions of dollars and, still, failure is still the most likely outcome with even the best of efforts and support.
Also, any party that cannot get past 5% of the Party Vote, or get at least one MP through the Electorate Vote, is a wasted option. In fact, as explained by Roger below, a protest vote can end up being a vote for those you most dislike!
No matter how sensible their policies may be, or how much you might like their people, if a party can’t get past these critical voter thresholds, they must step aside and actively encourage voters to support the party that best represents our interests and is the most likely to get at least several MPs into Parliament.
The automotive industry is moving quickly now to take away one of the last freedoms most Americans still have: the ability to get in oneās own vehicle and drive anywhere one wants, whenever they want to.
In an announcement this week, Biometric Update reported that almost all of the major automakers have either recently announced or have already patented facial recognition technologies that will require drivers to supply a scanned image of their faces in order to use their autos in the near future.
A slew of the worldās largest automakers, including Sony, Honda, Ford, Genesis, and Mullen Automotive, have all either recently announced or patented facial recognition technologies.
A newly unveiled prototype car from Sony and Honda, called āAfeela,ā is set to employ facial recognition to unlock the vehicle and open its door.
The semiconductors and chipsets set to underpin this biometric tech will be provided by electronics giant Qualcomm.
The firms will start taking orders in 2025, with U.S. deliveries set to start in 2026.
All visitors have to register via biometrics, such as palm scans, face scans, eye scans, etc., before they are allowed to enter. Once they enter, they are continually monitored via cameras and microphones that monitor oneās biometrics while on the premises. Anyone who approaches the premises is picked up by cameras that immediately seek to identify who the person is before allowing entrance.
Did I just describe how one visits a friend or relative who is incarcerated in a jail, prison or mental ward, or did I just describe how new āsmart homesā operate?
Actually, both. And thatās the point.
The public is voluntarily surrendering their privacy for the sake of āconvenienceā and āsecurity,ā while not understanding that what they are trading in for these āconveniencesā and illusions of āsecurityā is the ability for government agents to lock them down in their own homes, just as they lock down prisoners in jails, hospitals, mental institutions, and other places of incarceration.
“On the Unchartered Territory Podcast, Dan Astin-Gregory and Sam X discussed globalisation, deglobalisation, centralisation, decentralisation and localisation.”
“….the term āBRICSā was coined a couple of decades ago by Jim OāNeill who was the Chief Economist at Goldman Sachs”.
They talked about a move away from the dominance of America, Sam said, āThey even painted in investment vehicles around this very name and the idea potential for BRICS currency ā¦ The theory being that [ ] what these inside bankers were looking at was that the empiristic nature of the American Empire was becoming too obvious.ā
To commemorate the 150th anniversary of Goldman Sachsā founding in 1869, the company published a series of articles. One of the articles titled āWith GS Research Report, āBRICsā Are Bornā stated:
In 2001, Goldman Sachsā Global Investment Research Division publishes the report, āBuild Better Global Economic BRICs,ā coining the acronym for the four countries that would reshape the world economy ā Brazil, Russia, India and China.
Other BRICs-oriented research would follow from Goldman Sachs in the ensuing years, including 2003ās paper, āDreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050,ā which posited that the BRICs countries could overtake the largest Western economies by the year 2039.”
READ AT THE LINK
If you enjoy our posts, check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is
ViAqua Therapeutics, an Israeli-based biotechnology startup, has secured $8.25 million in funding for its oral RNA-based shrimp vaccine
The vaccine targets white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), which leads to a 15% reduction in global shrimp production each year
ViAqua plans to administer its RNA-based product via coated feed; the RNA molecules can inhibit gene expression, silencing disease-affected genes
Shrimp lack an adaptive immune system, the type that āremembersā exposures to infectious agents, so itās long been assumed that shrimp cannot be vaccinated; now itās becoming clear that shrimp do have some defense against viruses, which is only beginning to be understood
The risks of tinkering with shrimp genetics, and using mRNA shots in pigs, cattle and other animals intended for food, are completely unknown
Shrimp are slated to become the latest food source exposed to messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines, courtesy of ViAqua Therapeutics, an Israeli-based biotechnology startup. The company has secured $8.25 million in funding from venture capitalists for its oral RNA-based shrimp vaccine, which is intended to target white spot syndrome virus (WSSV).
With plans to administer its RNA-based product via coated feed, ViAqua suggests the RNA molecules can inhibit gene expression, silencing disease-affected genes with every meal.1 WSSV is a devastating condition in shrimp, leading to a 15% reduction in global shrimp production each year ā an annual loss of about $3 billion.2
ViAqua says challenge tests show its RNA-based formulation improved shrimp survival against WSSV, but at what cost? The use of mRNA in the food supply is controversial for good reason ā no one knows what the long-term consequences will be.
RNA Vaccines Coming for Shrimp
ViAqua is using RNA interference (RNAi) particles, provided as a feed supplement, to manipulate gene expression in shrimp, one of the most widely consumed forms of seafood worldwide. In a 2022 proof of concept study that used a polyanhydride nanoparticle delivery platform to deliver RNA to shrimp orally, itās stated:3
“RNA interference (RNAi) in invertebrates is an antiviral cellular mechanism by which a trigger, such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or small interfering RNA (siRNA) starts sequence-specific degradation of target mRNA, thereby preventing viral gene expression.
ā¦ In aquaculture systems, the concept of RNAi-based vaccines has been championed for several reasons: (a) RNAi works as an antiviral immune response in shrimp; (b) it is pathogen-specific; and (c) it generates a long-term protective immune response.”
The study found that the “nanovaccine” was about 80% effective in protecting against WSSV in shrimp, when administered via reverse gavage to “mimic an oral route.”4 ViAqua has brought the potential for oral delivery to the next level, with plans to begin producing its RNAi capsule products in India in 2024.5 Shai Ufaz, ViAquaās chief executive officer, stated:6
“Oral delivery is the holy grail of aquaculture health development due to both the impossibility of vaccinating individual shrimp and its ability to substantially bring down the operational costs of disease management while improving outcomes ā¦ We are excited to bring this technology to market to address the need for affordable disease solutions in aquaculture.”
Can Shrimp Be Vaccinated?
Shrimp lack an adaptive immune system, the type that “remembers” exposures to infectious agents so it can mount a better response the next time it comes around. Because of this, itās long been assumed that shrimp cannot be vaccinated. According to the Global Seafood Alliance:7
“Scientific literature on shrimp has often adopted terms and approaches from mammalian immunology, but not always in a correct way. Such is the case in the use of the term “vaccination” in crustaceans. The principle of vaccination is based on two key elements of the immune system: specificity and memory. These two properties are not recognized in the immune systems of shrimp and other invertebrates.”
However, while shrimp donāt have adaptive immunity in the traditional sense, itās becoming clear that they do have some defense against viruses, which is only beginning to be understood. In 2008, researchers with Australiaās University of Queensland explained, “There is mounting evidence for specific immune memory in crustaceans, including shrimp,” adding:8
“It has been widely assumed that no such adaptive systems exist in invertebrates, thus vaccines have not been routinely developed and used in shrimp aquaculture. Invertebrates were considered to rely solely on an innate immune system characterized by generalized immune responses to conserved molecular structures of invading pathogens such as bacteria and fungi.
Some of these pathways are relatively well understood, involving an array of pattern recognition receptors interacting with serine proteases to initiate encapsulation, phagocytosis and an antimicrobial cascade based on the phenoloxidase enzyme system.
However, what is becoming more apparent is that the diversity and sophistication of innate responses in invertebrates is far greater than previously assumed. The invertebrate immune response to viruses is particularly poorly understood.”
ViAquaās RNAi product claims to “enhance resistance to viral infections” in shrimp,9 and they have plans to develop additional mRNA vaccines for fish and other biotechnology products targeting additional shrimp viruses and other pathogens.10
But shrimp pathogens of one kind or another are virtually guaranteed to persist in the intensive aquaculture farms where many shrimp are raised. Further, the risks of tinkering with shrimp genetics are completely unknown.
The media has been pretty quiet about the up-and-coming genetic manipulation of shrimp. This seems to be par for the course. Few are aware that, since 2018, pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds ā as it largely slipped by under the radar.11
It wasnāt until attorney Tom Renz began promoting new legislation in Missouri (House Bill 1169,12 which he helped write) that would require labeling of mRNA products that it began to receive attention.13 In an April 1, 2023, tweet, Renz stated:14
“BREAKING NEWS: the lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH. WE MUST SUPPORT MISSOURI HB1169. It is LITERALLY the ONLY chance we have to prevent this ā¦ NO ONE knows the impacts of doing this but we are all potentially facing the risk of being a #DiedSuddenly if we don’t stop this.”
Even though the bill asks only for transparency ā not a ban of the mRNA-based shots ā industry pushback has been enormous. They donāt want you to know that theyāre using mRNA and similar products, because then they’d have to admit that the resulting foods may have gene-altering effects. And itās not just pork, either.
Cattle Groups Urge Caution Over mRNA
The first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot developed by Harrisvaccines was licensed in 2012.15 The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015.16
Concerns that mRNA injections could end up “in the global protein supply chain” also prompted warnings from cattle producers and calls for mandatory country of origin labeling (MCOOL) so consumers can choose meat from countries that donāt allow mRNA shots in meat animals.17
In an April 2023 news release, Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA), a nonprofit that represents interests of independent U.S. cattle producers, shared concerns about the use of mRNA shots in cattle and other meat animals. Max Thornsberry, DVM, R-CALFās animal health committee chair, met with medial doctors and a molecular biologist before briefing the R-CALF USA board:18
“Thornsberry reported that some researchers have found that mRNA and its coded virus is likely passed from an injected human to a noninjected human, and to humans who have consumed dairy products or meat from an mRNA-injected animal.
He said that because the research on mRNA is still in its infancy, no one really knows the full impact it has on either humans or animals, particularly its long-term impact. He said this itself warrants more extensive mRNA research focused on safety, heightened public vigilance, and greater transparency.”
In a commentary, R-CALF CEO Bill Bullard also urged caution regarding mRNA injections, stating:19
“Itās not a vaccine as we typically understand vaccines. So, for the rest of this discussion, Iāll refer to it as an injection. Itās an injection of a laboratory-produced substance into humans or livestock that is coded with a particular virus, such as COVID-19, that produces an immune response against the particular virus.
And what does mRNA do? Well, it hijacks living cells, tricking them into producing some level of immunity against human viruses like COVID-19 and livestock viruses such as foot-and-mouth disease or lumpy skin disease. It does this by rewriting the instructions from the bodyās DNA. And what are the potential risks to humans and livestock?
The truthful answer is we donāt yet know the long-term effects of mRNA injections in either humans or livestock.
ā¦ There is great concern that living cells excrete the mRNA over time and the mRNA can then be transferred to animals and humans that have never received the mRNA injection. It is believed, for example, that humans can contact mRNA by eating meat from livestock that have received the injection.
The reason mRNA is an issue today is that pharmaceutical firms have found that it takes very little of it to hijack a cell, and it can be produced cheaper than typical virus vaccines.”
Is it possible that mRNA or RNAi nanoparticles could persist in the meat and shrimp youāre eating? Penny Riggs, associate research professor of functional genetics at Texas A&M, stated, “The estimate is that half of the mRNA from a vaccine is gone in about 20 hours, and completely destroyed within a few days.”20
However, Thornsberry cited21 one study, published in Biomedicines, that found mRNA from injections can be detected in blood 15 days post-shot.22
The proof-of-concept study for the shrimp RNA nanovaccine also found the particles persisted long after administration: “The nanoparticles localized to tissue target replication sites for WSSV and persisted through 28 days post-administration.”23 Again, the consequences of consuming these nanoparticles remains to be seen.
Antibiotic Resistance Widespread in Shrimp
Farm-raised seafood is among the most contaminated foods you can eat, shrimp included. Antibiotics are commonly used on farmed shrimp in an attempt to slow down pathogens.24 Not surprisingly, shrimp is often contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria as a result.
One investigation by CBC News Marketplace found 17% ā nine of the 51 packages of shrimp imported from Vietnam, Thailand, China, India and Ecuador ā were contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.25 Among them, all but one showed resistance to multiple antibiotics.
Investigators purchased imported shrimp labeled “organic” as well as some with the “Best Aquaculture Practices” certification, which maintains that farmers only use antibiotics minimally.
So, while shrimp can be a healthy addition to your diet, itās important to avoid farm-raised shrimp, which is the type served in most restaurants and the variety thatās slated to receive a gene-altering nanoparticle vaccine in its feed. When it comes to purchasing high-quality shrimp, look for those that are either wild caught or locally produced.
The World Health Organizationās pandemic treaty, the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs) and the global One Health agenda are all part of a soft coup, a global power grab
The globalistsā plan for our future can be summarized as āglobal dominion by the few and total control of the massesā
The technocratic cabal has control over most if not all Western governments, as well as the bureaucratic structure of the WHO; 85% of its funding comes from private entities, so itās owned by private interests
Based on the current treaty draft and proposed IHR amendments, itās clear that mRNA-based vaccinations will be mandatory under the WHOās power structure, and these vaccines will be made in 100 days by skipping human trials and shaving safety and efficacy testing down to the bare bones
Under the treaty, as currently written, nations will be required to surveil and censor social media. The WHOās narrative will be the only one allowed
In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview,1 Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organizationās pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs), which add to and further strengthen the WHOās powers under the treaty. The WHOās One Health agenda is also part of this power grab.
Nass also recently published an article, “The WHOās Proposed Treaty Will Increase Manmade Pandemics,”2,3 in which she reviews the history of biological warfare and the role of gain-of-function research, where we are right now, and what the globalistsā plan for our future is. Itās imperative everyone understand what the plan is, because we can only stop it by rejecting it en masse.
Nass Persecuted by Lawless State Medical Board
But first, Nass provides an update on her personal situation. In January 2022, the Maine medical board suspended Nassā medical license for spreading “COVID misinformation” and prescribing ivermectin. They also ordered her to undergo a psychological evaluation by a board-selected psychologist.4 Nass refused.
As she points out in the interview, “misinformation” refers to information that may be mistaken or inaccurate, but being wrong is not a crime ā no matter how badly government wants you to think it is.
We have the First Amendment ā freedom of speech ā for a reason. Government does not have the legal right to suppress our speech, and the medical board is a state government agency. So, by censoring doctors like Nass and punishing them for speaking their minds and sharing medical and scientific data, they are actually the ones breaking the law.
Nass didnāt, because thereās no law against sharing information, even if it is suspected of being incorrect, or can be proven to be wrong. And, in this case, the board is actually punishing her for sharing truths.
So, in mid-August 2023, Nass sued the Maine medical board, and every board member in their personal capacity, for violating her free speech rights.5
“Telling me that I can’t talk about the vaccine or I can’t talk about the treatment of COVID or masks or distancing, even when the things that I was saying were based on published medical literature, that is a First Amendment violation,” Nass said in a statement.
“The state government and the federal government are not allowed to restrict the speech of people. So we are looking for a jury trial to see whether the Board of Licensure in Medicine is guilty of a malicious, political prosecution and targeting of me.”
The Plan in Broad Strokes
So, what is the globalists plan for our future? Summarized into as few words as possible: global dominion by the few and total control of the masses.
As explained by Nass, the COVID pandemic showed us that the technocratic cabal has control over most if not all Western governments. World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab has even bragged about how his Young Global Leaders have “penetrated” governments of the world.6
The technocratic cabal also has control over the bureaucratic structure of the WHO. Eighty-five percent of the WHOās funding comes from private entities, most of which is earmarked for specific programs. “So, the WHO is already owned by private interests,” Nass says.
According to the WHO, the reason the COVID pandemic got so bad is because nations failed to cooperate. Hence, the reasoning goes, we need an international treaty that centralizes pandemic response powers to the WHO. The problem, of course, is that most nations did follow the WHOās irrational and unscientific recommendations. Its ineptitude ā whether intentional or not ā is what destroyed economies and resulted in needless deaths.
Based on the current treaty draft and proposed IHR amendments, itās clear that mRNA-based vaccinations will be mandatory under the WHOās power structure, and these vaccines will be made in 100 days rather than 10 years by skipping human trials and shaving safety and efficacy testing down to the bare bones.
The WHO will also decide which medications can be used in medical emergencies, and which you cannot have. In other words, the WHO director-general will decide the health care for every person in every member state, and your local doctor will be required to follow his edicts. Youāll have no medical freedom or bodily autonomy anymore.
Nations will also be forced to implement massive nationwide biosurveillance programs to identify potential pathogens with pandemic potential. This will include swabbing and testing humans, domesticated animals, farm animals, wildlife, farms, factories, wastewater and more, and the chances of finding a pathogen with pandemic potential if searching for it in every nook and cranny of the world are 100%.
The WHO director-general will then have the sole authority to declare a pandemic, or even potential pandemic, at which point all decision-making powers fall under the WHO. However, there are no standards that must be met before a public health emergency can be declared.
The way these documents are written, the director-general can even act on what amounts to hearsay. He doesnāt have to have proof that a pandemic is imminent or in progress. He can act on suspicion. Even more disturbing, the treaty will be in force all the time, so the director-general doesnāt even need to declare an emergency. He will have the authority to dictate public health even when thereās no pandemic. Thatās how far-reaching this treaty is.
Nations will also be required to surveil and censor social media. The WHOās narrative will be the only one allowed. YouTube has already implemented this policy, even though the treaty is not even in place yet.
The History of Biological Warfare and How We Got Here
Nass also reviews the history of biological weapons and why weāre in a situation now where most of the pandemics that have occurred are basically the result of biological weapons development.
In 1969, President Nixon announced the U.S. would end its offensive biowarfare program. This was a strategic rather than altruistic move, because the U.S. was far ahead of other nations when it came to chemical and nuclear weapons. By banning biological weapons, which are relatively simple and inexpensive to create, the U.S. would gain a strategic advantage on the global stage.
Nixon initiated the first global treaty to prevent the creation and use of biological weapons in 1972. The Biological Weapons Convention took effect three years later, in 1975. However, in 1973, genetic engineering was discovered, which suddenly allowed the U.S. to gain a technological advantage that would allow us to make better and more precise biological weapons.
The problem with the Biological Weapons Convention is that thereās no enforcement. To be effective and verifiable, a nation needs to be able to challenge another nation and have the right to carry out inspections, and add sanctions in cases of noncompliance. But this enforcement method was not included, and the U.S. has blocked all efforts to add enforcement articles to the treaty since 1991. So, as explained by Nass:7
“Under the guise of preparing their defenses against biowarfare and pandemics, nations have conducted ādual-useā (both offensive and defensive) research and development, which has led to the creation of more deadly and more transmissible microorganisms. And employing new verbiage to shield this effort from scrutiny, biological warfare research was named āgain-of-functionā research.”
SARS-CoV-2, for example, appears to be the direct result of gain-of-function research. As noted by Nass, it has “unusual homologies (identical short segments of nucleotides) to human tissues and the HIV virus, which may have caused or contributed to the late autoimmune stage of illness, an impaired immune response and ālong COVID.ā”
As such, SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. David Martin, Ph.D., has also done many interviews, speeches and lectures exposing COVID-19 as a biological warfare crime. https://rumble.com/embed/v2oem0q/?pub=4Video Link
Are We Funding Public Health or Bioweapons Development?
As noted in Nassā article, funding for natural epidemics, such as seasonal influenza, has been lumped together with biodefense funding, which hides the cost of our nationās bioweapons development, because in reality, “biodefense” is “bioweapons development.”
And, while bioweapons development is dangerous and violates the international treaty, biodefense is useless and a complete waste of money, so itās a lose-lose proposition for taxpayers.
In March 2023, former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield testified before Congress stating that gain-of-function research had never, to his knowledge, resulted in a single beneficial drug, vaccine or therapeutic.8
In other words, while they conduct this research under the guise of “defense,” all gain-of-function research is biological weapons research and has no beneficial public health applications.
The pandemic treaty promotes the proliferation of biological weapons, and opens the door wide to biological weapons research and testing. It will take us in the opposite direction of where we need to go to prevent future pandemics.
The WHO treaty makes matters even worse by requiring member nations to look for pathogens with pandemic potential, and when they find them, to share them, and any research done on them, with everyone else.
So, the WHO treaty quite literally promotes the proliferation of biological weapons, and opens the door wide to biological weapons research and testing. This will also remove the ability to cast blame on any particular nation for starting a pandemic (read unleash a biological weapon), as everyone is working with the same pathogens.
The treaty also requires nations to eliminate administrative hurdles to gain-of-function research on pathogens with pandemic potential, when we really need far more stringent regulations on this type of work, if weāre going to engage in it at all.
So, the WHO treaty will move us in the complete opposite direction of where we actually need to go if we want to prevent future pandemics. To prevent them, we need to stop gain-of-function research, because thatās the greatest pandemic threat out there.
Pandemic Preparedness Is a Smokescreen
Similarly, the idea that the world can prepare ahead of time for a global pandemic is “a smokescreen behind which lies a fascist approach to social management,” Nass writes. She adds:9
“Thereās no known way to prevent pandemics, and the methods that governments are spending money on are actually going to make this problem a great deal worse.
The concept of a āresponseā: withholding cheap, available generic drugs in favor of the warp speed development of patentable drugs and vaccines, which will undergo minimal testing and have no liability, is another disaster in the making.”
Our Health Agencies Are Selling Us Out
Importantly, the U.S. government ā including our health agencies ā have been central in developing and writing these documents, which strips us of our sovereignty as a nation, bodily autonomy as a people, along with freedom, human rights and democracy in general.
Indeed, the IHR amendments specifically remove the need to respect “human rights, dignity and freedom of persons” during public health emergencies. This deletion did not go unnoticed, however, and after severe criticism, language “guaranteeing” human rights was inserted into the latest draft (the Bureau draft) of the pandemic treaty.
The bottom line is, our health agencies are not protecting us. Theyāre controlled by private, globalist interests, and theyāre selling us out.
We also see this in the way the U.S. health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Food and Drug Administration refused to course correct once it became clear that the COVID shots were not preventing infection or transmission, and were causing historically high rates of injuries.
Instead, they doubled down and imposed mandates, and started fiddling with database algorithms to hide the extent of injuries and deaths. Likewise, the WHO is working on an international vaccine passport, even though the entire premise for it has been eliminated. If the shots donāt prevent infection or transmission, then what good does proof of “vaccination” do?
Same with the masks. No matter how much scientific evidence was thrown at them, health authorities refused to admit that masks donāt work and pushed for wearing two or three masks instead. And what can we say about the worldwide recommendation to treat only advanced-stage infection? Itās medicine 101 to treat a condition as early as possible, especially when it comes to infections.
As noted by Nass, “There can be no question about it: Our health agencies are guilty of malfeasance, misrepresentation and deliberate infliction of harm on their own populations.”
All the basic rules of medicine were tossed out during COVID, and under the pandemic treaty, common sense and basic medical facts will be ousted forever. Nass goes through much more in her article, so I urge you to read it10 in its entirety.
The Timeline
The IHR amendments will only require a 50% vote of whoever is in the room at the time of the vote, which will take place at the World Health Assemblyās annual meeting, May 22 through 24, 2024.11 The amendments will take effect 10 months later for any nation that does not opt out.
Nations that have not officially opted out will then be bound by the new terms laid out in the amendments. The pandemic treaty will also be voted on during that meeting. It will require two-thirds vote in favor by the members that are in the room and will go into effect as soon as 30 nations have ratified it.
Thirty days after that, the treaty will go into effect for all the nations that have signed on. Any nation that has not signed the treaty will be excluded from its terms. Those who sign the treaty must wait three years before they can get out.
Door To Freedom
To prevent this nightmare, Nass has founded a new organization called Door To Freedom (doortofreedom.org), which seeks to educate people around the world about what the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will change life as we know it, and strip us of every vestige of freedom.
Door To Freedom has created a poster to explain the impacts the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will have. Please download this poster and share it with everyone you know. Also put it up on public billboards and places where communities share information.
Other Action Items
While the situation seems incredibly bleak, Nass insists there are many things we can do to prevent the WHOās power grab, including the following:
ā¢ Call your congressman or congresswoman and urge them to sponsor H.R.79 ā The WHO Withdrawal Act,12 introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, which calls for defunding and exiting the WHO. At the time of this writing, it has 51 cosponsors, all of them Republicans. We cannot get this bill passed without Democrats, so we need to get them to understand whatās at stake.
The Sovereignty Coalition is making it easier for everyone to make their voices heard. Its Help the House Defund the WHO page will allow you to contact all of your elected representatives with just a few clicks. Simply fill out the required field, click submit, and your contact information will be used to match you with your elected representatives.
ā¢ Also urge your congressman or congresswoman to sponsor H.R.1425,13 which would require the pandemic treaty to be approved by the Senate. It currently has 27 cosponsors.
ā¢ Share Door To Freedomās educational poster15 everywhere you can, and direct them to doortofreedom.org for more information. Also share, share, share information about the IHR amendments and how they will destroy national sovereignty, and increase surveillance and censorship. You can find a quick summary here.
Some sixteen months after the peaceful assembly of people from all areas of New Zealand was brutally invaded and dispersed by henchmen of the political State, an extraordinary documentary film has emerged: āRiver of Freedomā.
River of Freedom is a documentary being shown in cinemas across New Zealand sharing the inside story of the New Zealand Convoy and Parliament protests in February and March 2022 ā who the people were, why they were there, and what happened! Fed up with covid restrictions and vaccine mandates, thousands of people convoyed to Wellington from all around the country, demanding change and expecting democratic representation.
This heretical dispatch examines the logic of Elon Muskās X-Corporation āfamilyā of companies following the rebrand of the feedback media platform,Ā Twitter, toĀ X. On the surface, Muskās promotion of his ventures present logical fallacies.
Yet, with each venture Musk plays the archetypal heroic savior role rescuing the planet from a sci-fi dystopian future. Below the surface, every venture fits his vision of humanity becoming a multi-planetary species, in which Mars is cast as a galactic stepping-stone. On the one hand, he has claimed three of his ventures, such as the tunnel-drilling Boring Company ā which lay the networks for AutoPilot, Teslaās āautonomousā electric vehicles project ā are focussed on mitigating climate change.
Meanwhile, his Neuralink company forwards a cyborg vision aimed at fusing humans with machines, which Musk claims will save humanity from becoming A.I.ās pets, or worse, an enslaved race. On the other hand, Muskās Starlink is marketed as a telecommunications company delivering wifi radio signals to remote locations, thereby connecting wildernesses to cyberspace. Space-X is the rocket company pioneering multi-trip rockets that will be capable ā it is hoped ā of delivering humans, resources and biological life to forge civilization on Mars.
His sales pitch for acquiringĀ Twitter, entailed championing free speech in a dark time when censorship of critical dissident voices became an instrumentalized global public-private partnership to monopolize feedback. ThenĀ TwitterĀ changed its mark.
Deductive reasoning suggests that the centi-billionaire has essentially cast himself as a faux Rebel Alliance cheerleader, amid the emergence of a universal empire ā finds formerĀ Auckland StarĀ paperboy, Steve āSnoopmanā Edwards, of New Zealand.
Yet, Muskās true role is more like bounty-hunter, Boba Fett, who served two masters ā Lord Darth Vader, Commander of the Imperial Fleet and Jabba Desilijic Tiure, the sluggish crime lord controlling the Hutt Cartel ā in the Star Wars Universe.
The gravitational pull of Muskās SpaceX clients ā the US Department of Defense, NASA, and the National Reconnaissance OfficeĀ ā have drawn Muskās dream of humanity becoming a multi-planetary species into their orbit, amid a dangerous time for the species. Old imperial rivals are competing for controlling places in an emergent universal empire that aspires, somehow, to be a space-faring civilization.
As a combination ā and with Muskās faux āRebel Allianceā cheerleader posture ā X-Corp adds legitimacy to a mega-cartel field of firms set on constructing a dystopian totalitarian control grid to subsume freedom of speech, association and movement.
Rather than mitigating ecological destruction, defending civil freedoms or saving humanity from extinction events, evolutionary enslavement, or empiric egoism ā Muskās Aspergerās drive locks in his X-Corp on a Techno-Feudalist trajectory.
This release reports increased trends of cancer incidence that suddenly accelerated after the vaccine rollout began. First, we consider what the media are currently reporting about rising cancer incidence and then what they could have investigated but havenāt.
āAfter 22 years of studying 9/11 and looking at the evidence, I have come to the conclusion that there was no high jacked planes nor a boogeyman in a cave who set up these events but rather a very sinister planā claims an X user who goes by the name of āThe Punisherā He has made his enormous piece of collated research entitled ā911 Revisited ā What Really Happened on 911ā³ available to all on the X platform and has dedicated it to victims and families of 9/11 as well as emergency personnel, firemen, and law enforcement, and to William Cooper who warned us of everything that happened.ā
The Problem with Smart Meters -Worldwide Testimonies
On Tuesday 5th Sep 2023 the UK Parliament quietly approved a bill clearing the way towards forcing British citizens to have smart meters installed in their homes and for individual electrical appliances including; fridges, dishwashers, and washers to be fitted with smart functions (Source). The key to smart functionality is that these appliances can be operated externally āin response to load signalsā which means that smart meters will soon allow for your energy to be rationed remotely or even cut off completely according to the Smart Tyranny coalition [Source].
Essential Upgrade
We are being put into a position where it will be hard to refuse as the state has plans to force non-compliant residences into having a smart meter installed or face a Ā£15,000 fine. āThe replacement of traditional gas and electricity meters with smart meters is an essential national infrastructure upgrade for Great Britainā we are told by the government which is promoting the use of a smart meter as a money-saving device. (source).
RELATED: Read what a powerco told Taumaranui customers in 2016 (in case you think SMs are harmless. Watch the doco Take Back Your Power – note, scroll down). One technician I encountered said they’re ‘not allowed to talk about it’ … (the potential harms) … how’s that for transparency?
If you enjoy our posts, check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is
You must be logged in to post a comment.