All posts by Pam Vernon

I'm for justice and equity for all peoples everywhere. I am also for exposing lies and corruption, particularly the lies of the corporations that have a tight grip on humanity, all for profit and control. A grip that has been instrumental in the rape and pillage of indigenous peoples planet wide, for centuries.

Covid-19 experimental injection

Lockstep Lawyers for the Phantom of the Five Eyes

January 10, 2025 Pam Vernon 3 Comments

Extract from the DEI Report from Buddle Findlay with some interesting graphics

Image by LEANDRO AGUILAR from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection

New Zealand’s Stealthy Pivot to Police State Status — Parts 1 & 2

January 9, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Steve Snoopman @ substack

The Origins of the NZ Government’s Covid Elimination Strategy, Lockdown Laws and Mass Vaccination Drive

The origins of the New Zealand Government’s elimination strategy is traced, as well as its aspiration for high vaccination uptake and the nation’s embroilment in the World Health Organization’s pandemic trigger mechanisms — back to a 2002 Ministry of Health discussion paper published, as the SARS-Cov-1 outbreak began.

As far back as 2005, the United Nations’ World Health Organisation gained the power to construct trigger mechanisms to declare pandemics, that would eventually lead to the health departments across the 196 members nations being reoriented for an over-hyped health crisis.

Former news and current affairs editor Steve Snoopman finds that New Zealand’s Government gained for itself invasive powers to lockdown, search, seize and detain with amendments to the Public Health in 2006. Yet, the Government has exploited the over-hyped Covid-19 hysteria to expand its Medical Martial Law powers.

READ AT THE LINK

New Zealand’s Stealthy Pivot to Police State Status — Part 2

Lying by Numbers, Hyped Fear-Porn News and the U.N.’s 2nd Global Pandemic Exercise, starring ❛Covid-19❜

New Zealand’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic was (and remains) disproportionate to the threat because the Government failed to model for the United Nation’s Second Global Pandemic Exercise being taken ‘live’ — amid a planned media hype strategy. This failure was ‘too stupid to be stupid’.

The latest Covid-19 lockdown of the entire nation — which was announced on August 17 and was initially justified on the basis of just one suspected Delta variant case — actually followed a government commissioned report released the previous week that warned of the impacts of the Delta variant spreading from other countries, including Australia.

However, this investigation finds that despite the media hype of the Delta variant mortality, the figures from overseas do not wear the fear.

READ AT THE LINK

This dispatch was originally published 4 September, 2021 on Snoopman News.

[Editor’s Note: All data as at 11:59PM 3 September 2021 NZT, or prior].

Photo Credit: Steve Snoopman

Covid-19 experimental injection

“SARS & MERS were set up to kill a lot more people” said the NZ vaccinologist … was that a Freudian slip?

January 8, 2025 Pam Vernon 5 Comments

A timely repost looking back on the plandemic of 2020 onwards … who could forget that? And straight from the horse’s mouth here. Lest you still believe in the safe & effective & all those empty pHarma promises … EWNZ

To listen to the Newshub interview go to this link..and hear the following:

Interviewer: How bad is this. I mean, how evil is this one?

Dr Petousis-Harris: It’s not the most evil that we’ve had … SAARS and MERS coronaviruses (?) were much more severe, they killed, ah were set up to kill a lot more people.

Revolving Doors of Power: Commercial NZ Health Group obtains 30% of all Granted Applications for ‘Vaccine’ Mandate Exemptions – 2 months later a Senior Government Manager is Appointed their CEO

January 7, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Ursula Edgington, PhD @ substack

NZ Health Group managed to continue profitable business during 2021-22 when all 2467 ‘vaccine’ mandate exemption applications for their staff were granted by the (anon) Gov Covid Exemption Panel.

I’ve written before about the NZ ‘vaccine’ mandates and exemptions. An overview is here, and here and more specifically I’ve looked at many of the impacted public sector workers, like the nurses, teachers, paramedics and also in our prisons. I’ve also written a lot about ways academia controls the narrative, which include the revolving doors of international Public Private Partnerships (PPPs). Here, I want to focus on an example of how all these topics – academia, PPPs and wealthy shareholders – fit together.

Re-Cap on ‘No Jab, No Job’

During the height of the covid era totalitarianism, it was virtually impossible for any public (or commercial) sector worker who was mandated, to obtain an official ‘exemption’. Like many stories around the globe, whether your application was based on health, cultural or religious grounds, ALL were dismissed in the unethical and illogical claim:

“It’s for the Greater Good”

Many of us already knew the mandates were anti-science, but it became more widely known in MEP Robert Roos’ great Tweet when Pfizer exec Janice Small sniggered as she confirmed the fact there was no testing for transmission (45 secs):

Health Forum NZ, the Nurses’ Professional Association of New Zealand, NZDSOS and NZTSOS and many other such national advocacy groups have pointed out, the gatekeepers of the schools, prisons, surgeries, universities, hospitals and so many other organisations, including the unions, prevented staff from even knowing what the procedures for applying for an exemption were, let alone submitting one on their behalf. As a direct result of this blanket policy and military-grade censorship and propaganda, many people understandably felt coerced or forced to get the jab, and were subsequently harmed, or even died as a result.

Exemptions were literally SO rare (even those who had taken one dose and suffered an adverse reaction, were tragically not exempted from having to get a second, or third), that many people assumed no-one managed to avoid the wrath of the BigPharma captured Ministry of Health diktat.

But then I discovered that at least 6,707 healthcare-related staff in NZ were granted an exemption to the mandate under the law. (This has now been revised to 5,216 – more on that soon). So I was intrigued to find out who these people were – and more importantly, how these exemptions were obtained.

It turns out, after complaining to the Government Ombudsman, in a long-awaited OIA response that I sent 11 October 2023 (Ref HNZ00030952), that 11,741 total applications for ‘vaccine’ mandate exemptions were received between 27 Oct 2021 and 5 Sept 2022.

Gold Dust Exemptions

Amongst the long spreadsheet of redacted items, one thing stands out: the repeated applications for multiple individuals (some will be duplicates for extensions) from the commercial entity ‘New Zealand Health Group’. The main shareholder, NZ-Rich Listed Doug Catley’s empire has accumulated many names (see the image below). All are involved in providing some type of community-level care for our diverse population, from mental health counselling, agency staffing or emergency alarms etc:

According to its website, New Zealand Health Group is the

“largest community health, disability and wellbeing group supporting over 30,000 people to get on with making the most of life in their own homes, communities and work places…”

And at the helm, CEO since last year is Jane Kelley. What was she doing prior to Jan 2023 you ask? Well, it won’t be any surprise to those familiar with the revolving doors of power, that she was at the NZ Ministry of Health as ‘Director, National Controller’ for the ‘Covid-19 National Health Coordination Centre’.

Jane Kelley in the revolving door.

In this recent Opinion Piece by Kelley from Dec 2023 she explains the benefits of PPPs in healthcare (it is, after all, a numbers game):

“Addressing the workforce shortage is an example of progressive collaboration. Working in partnership with MSD (Ministry of Social Development), we have successfully trained and employed more than 1000 new support workers, some who (sic) may not have considered the home and community sector a viable employment option. We’ve also set up programmes that enable people who are helping care for family and whānau at home, to use their skills to qualify as a support worker.” (my emphasis)

The ‘beauty’ of the PPPs (for people like Kelley) is that any detail about the funds collected by these ‘partnerships’ with MSD etc are outside the Official Information Act (OIA), and any questions to the Gov Dept concerned are often bounced back with the claim “commercially sensitive”. Hence the true extent of the exploitation and profits that Health Group NZ makes from tax-payers’ funds being syphoned into ambiguously defined ‘care’, is unknown. This is a global problem as PPPs and their leeches have grown in the impact investor financial sector.

Likewise, OIAs have failed to get any transparency about who exactly the people were at the top of the NZ Gov ‘Covid Response’ decision-making (apparently due to Privacy Act reasons). But it’s useful to investigate who this Panel MAY have included.

Looking at Kelley’s public career profile for a moment, we can see her Linkedin page lists her most recent appointment as beginning in Nov 2022, which supports this PR-firm’s announcement (stating she actually started her role in January 2023), which goes on to state:

With over 25 years in the health sector, Jane has held a variety of executive, operational, and project leadership roles. Most recently Jane was the Director – National Controller Covid19 – National Health Coordination Centre, responsible for facilitating the Ministry of Health’s initial crisis response to Covid19. This was a pivotal role that involved establishing and leading a team of 300 and developing strategic relationships with multiple stakeholders from the highest level in Government through to local communities.

I wonder who her ‘team of 300’ were? Any Whistleblowers amongst them perhaps? But this same article is bending the truth slightly, claiming that her ‘most recent’ role was at the Ministry of Health – or was it? Let’s look more closely at her Linkedin profile (screenshot below):

Fernhill Solutions is a consultancy firm which benefits from being a New Zealand Government ‘All of Government (AoG) Consultancy Panel’ (full explanation and directory here) in the following sub-categories:

“Business Change/Policy, Research and Development/Procurement and Logistics”

This status means it can effectively fast-track through any NZ Government tender process to obtain potentially lucrative funding/contracts. That doesn’t seem like a good idea to me as a NZ taxpayer, but it’s the ‘new normal’ of the PPP impact investment world.

Screenshot from the NZ Health Group website (as at 18/03/2024)

The Fernhill Solutions website is (conveniently) down at the time of writing this. But back in 30 January 2021 Kelley was indeed listed on the ‘Our People’ section of the archived version of their website along with David Crowley. But upon further investigation at NZ Companies Services, we can see the new shareholding company of Fernhill Solutions ‘Hapuna Holdings’, with Crowley and Kelley also as Directors. (They are also Directors of Hapuna Equine and Hapuna Developments). One of the last items posted on the Fernhill Solutions website is this poorly-written article (eg ‘Addition’ in the first line should read ‘Addiction’) about collating Public Submissions for a Report to Government…

Screenshot of the WayBack Machine capture from the Fernhill post (Jan 2020)

Up until Aug 2020, Kelley was apparently also a Director of Avid Support Ltd, a H&S consultancy business, based in Dunedin.

Edit to add an Addendum here 28/05/24. OIA responses have revealed that Kelley’s Fernhill Consultants were paid by NZ Government a total NZ$232,100 during the height of the covid era (mandate) insanity (Oct 2021-Sept 2022). Not for covid-related tests or jabs, though, but breast cancer ‘vision’ computer ‘modelling’ and surveillance (not the screening itself it seems). This opens up another whole can of worms:

So what?

To summarise, on 12 Nov 2021, the Ministry of Health established a Panel to be led by Sir Ashley Bloomfield who were to meet regularly, read and consider the applications for those Kiwis who applied for an exemption under the SSD Vaccination Order ‘emergency’ laws. Of the 11,741 individuals listed in the applications made, only 68% (8,051) were granted. And of those granted, most, 5,217(ish) were from District Health Boards (more on that soon). All 49 of the applications from Allied Health were declined. But a staggering 2,467 of those granted were not from other patient-serving, under-staffed, poorly-funded public sectors, but instead from corporate giant NZ Health Group.

Remember this was never about Public Health!

Jane Kelley was employed as a Senior Director for the NZ Government’s ‘Covid 19 Response’ by the Ministry of Health in or around Jan 2020. According to her Linkedin profile, she was undertaking ‘consultancy’ work (for Government) between Aug 2021 until Nov 2023 at which point she was appointed CEO of the NZ Health Group. This is the same company which inexplicably benefited from nearly a third of all ‘vaccine’ mandate exemptions, which allowed private healthcare provision to continue throughout the totalitarian era, inevitably pushing up profits for its wealthy shareholders with their private jets. I can’t help wondering what Kelley’s consultancy fees are, and her new salary (although there are some useful clues).

Worldwide, ethical lawyers are working hard to reclaim our Human Rights, that were lost during the covid era. There has been some wins like the NZ Police and Defence Force. But progress is slow.

Finally, it’s worth noting this excerpt from the Healthcare NZ Bio about the wealthy main NZ Health Group Shareholder, Catley:

In the past, Doug has been the Deputy plus Acting Chairman of the Wellington Area Health Board and Chairman of its Policy and Finance Committee. He has also been a member of the Council for the University of Otago’s Wellington School of Medicine, a member of the Medical Research Foundation, and Deputy Chairman of the Board for a major New Zealand bank (TrustBank), the latter being a Prime Ministerial appointment.

(It’s not what you know…)

Meanwhile, our qualified, loyal and experienced public sector workers, including desperately needed nurses, were unfairly discriminated against and declined access to even apply for an exemption, let alone be granted one. Like many of us, they are still being discriminated against today, as I explain here.

If you have further information about this topic, please comment or message me privately. The PDF of the OIA’s spreadsheet should appear below:

Appendix One

864KB ∙ PDF file

Download

SOURCE

Photo by Zack Yeo on Unsplash

Treaty of Waitangi

Dr Carwyn Jones: It’s critical to submit on the principles bill – due tomorrow Tues 7 Jan. 2025

January 6, 2025 Pam Vernon 3 Comments

From Dr Carwyn Jones

The proposed Treaty principles bill fundamentally changes the meaning of Te Tiriti, and should be opposed through submissions as well as protest, writes Dr Carwyn Jones.

The Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill is now before the justice select committee, and open for submissions.

The proposed law aims to redefine “the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi”, a concept that’s been used in New Zealand law and government since 1975.

Here’s Carwyn Jones explaining what’s in the bill, what happens now it’s had a first reading, and how to make a submission.

The first reading of a bill is one stage in the law-making process. It’s the first opportunity that MPs have to debate the proposed law and to vote on whether it progresses to the next stage.

The three parties in the coalition government (National, New Zealand First, and Act) agreed to introduce this bill and vote to support it at this first reading stage.

The bill therefore passed this stage with all the MPs of the coalition parties supporting it (68 votes) and all the MPs from the opposition parties voting against it (54 votes).

What are the coalition government’s proposed principles of the Treaty that are set out in the bill?

The bill proposes three new principles to replace the principles that are now in use. The established principles include partnership, active protection, redress, mutual benefit, and equity. The three new principles proposed by the coalition government are set out in clause 6 of the bill:

Proposed principle 1: The Government of New Zealand has full power to govern, and Parliament has full power to make laws. They do so in the best interests of everyone, and in accordance with the rule of law and the maintenance of a free and democratic society.
Proposed principle 2: The Crown recognises the rights that hapū and iwi had when they signed the Treaty/te Tiriti. The Crown will respect and protect those rights. Those rights differ from the rights everyone has a reasonable expectation to enjoy only when they are specified in Treaty settlements.
Proposed principle 3: Everyone is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination. Everyone is entitled to the equal enjoyment of the same fundamental human rights without discrimination.

What is the problem with the proposed principles?

The main problem with the proposed principles is that they do not reflect the agreement made in Te Tiriti o Waitangi. The bill presents a false picture of Te Tiriti.

Under Te Tiriti, Māori leaders granted the British Crown the authority of kāwanatanga (governmental authority in relation to British subjects in New Zealand). This authority is limited by the ongoing exercise of Māori authority, guaranteed in Te Tiriti as tino rangatiratanga.

The new “Principle 1” proposed in the bill ignores the guarantee of tino rangatiratanga.

The effect of the proposed “Principle 2” also ignores the guarantee of tino rangatiratanga. This newly created principle means that Te Tiriti o Waitangi offers no recognition or protection of Māori rights. Under that principle, Māori rights would depend on settlement legislation or recognition by some other instrument that applies to everyone.

Not only does this make tino rangatiratanga subordinate or subject to kāwanatanga, but it also erases the recognition of Māori rights altogether. This is contrary not only to Te Tiriti, but to international standards set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The proposed “Principle 3” also seeks to erase Māori from Te Tiriti. Article 3 of Te Tiriti is a promise made specifically to Māori that Māori would enjoy the rights and privileges of British subjects. Te Tiriti does not make such a promise to anyone else.

There are, however, plenty of mechanisms within the New Zealand legal system that are aimed at protecting all citizens from discrimination and ensuring equality before the law. The new “Principle 3” does not add anything to those protections.

All it would do is remove a mechanism that helps Māori enjoy the equal rights and equal protection of the law.

The proposed principles are also completely different from established principles that have been used for decades as the main way in which the government tries to give effect to its obligations under Te Tiriti.

But the bill won’t change Te Tiriti itself, will it?

The bill cannot, of course, change the words that were written in 1840 and agreed to as Te Tiriti o Waitangi. However, the bill is seeking to fundamentally change the legal meaning and effect of Te Tiriti.

Has the government engaged with Māori about this bill?

No. Through this bill, the government has proposed to fundamentally change the meaning of Te Tiriti without any engagement with its treaty partner.

Is the bill likely to become law?

The coalition agreements state that the government will support the bill to pass the first reading stage. Now that stage is complete, there is no further commitment to support the bill to become law. National and New Zealand First have indicated that they will vote against the bill becoming law. If they maintain that stance, then it seems unlikely that this bill will become law.

However, despite their stated opposition to the bill, those two parties both agreed to include this bill in the coalition agreements, and they supported the introduction of the bill and voted in support of it at the first reading. There are no guarantees that they will oppose the bill at later stages of the process, particularly if they perceive some political advantage to supporting it.

In any case, the Act leader, David Seymour, has been clear that, even if this bill doesn’t become law, it will have laid the foundation to propose similar laws and/or referendums in the future.

What will happen if the bill does become law?

If the bill becomes law, a referendum will be held that would ask voters whether they support the law coming into force. If a majority of voters agree, then the law will come into force six months later.

That would mean that the newly created principles in the bill would replace the established principles that the courts and government have been working with for decades.

The new interpretation of the principles would apply whenever the concept of “the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi” arises in the context of other legislation. This would create considerable uncertainty in the law. It’s likely that prolonged and costly litigation would result, as the meaning and application of these new principles are worked out.

As noted above, the new principles would also effectively erase the recognition of tino rangatiratanga and remove the primary mechanism by which government provides for Indigenous rights here in Aotearoa.

What has the Waitangi Tribunal said about the bill?

The Waitangi Tribunal has issued a two-part report which addresses both this bill and the government policy to review references to “the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi” in 28 pieces of legislation. Part 1 of the Tribunal’s Ngā Mātāpono report can be found here. Part 2 can be found here.

The Waitangi Tribunal was highly critical of both the process and content of the bill.

In terms of process, the Tribunal noted, among other things, the lack of engagement with Māori:

This complete disempowerment of Māori in a process to rewrite the principles is unprecedented. It goes against the tenets of good government that Māori are entitled to expect as citizens, let alone as the Crown’s Treaty/te Tiriti partner. This exclusion from any say in a process to abrogate fundamental rights is extremely prejudicial, and the impacts will not fade for a long time even if the Bill does not proceed beyond the select committee.

In relation to the proposed “Principle 1”, the Tribunal stated:

In our view, Principle 1 is not consistent with the words, meaning, or intent of article 1 of the Treaty/te Tiriti. Rather, it is a statement of a new principle that bears no relation to article 1, overstates the kāwanatanga of the Crown, and ignores the two spheres of Crown and Māori authority that the Treaty/te Tiriti established, where overlaps must be resolved by good faith cooperation between the partners.

In relation to the proposed “Principle 2”, the Tribunal stated:

We find that principle 2 is the complete antithesis of article 2, and Cabinet’s approval of it for the Bill breaches the Treaty/te Tiriti. If enacted, Principle 2 would formally revoke in a statute the promises and guarantees the Queen made to Māori in 1840. It tramples underfoot the mana of the Treaty/te Tiriti and the mana of all Māori. It would have devastating prejudicial impacts . . .

The Tribunal also found that Principle 3 bears no resemblance at all to the texts and meaning of Article 3 for several reasons, including the following:

The Crown’s solemn promises in article 3 were made to Māori, not ‘everyone’, in recognition of their agreement to the Crown’s kāwanatanga and pre-emption powers.

. . .

Māori face barriers to equality that others do not, and many of those barriers were of the Crown’s making, which means that Māori do not always have a level playing field with other New Zealanders, and equitable treatment is required to ensure outcomes that are more equal. Equality without equitable treatment does not capture the promises made in Article 3 or the meaning of the Treaty/te Tiriti as a whole.

People in a modern liberal democracy can and do have different rights. Both officials and the Associate Minister interpreted the right to equality to mean that whenever the Treaty/te Tiriti is relevant to interpreting the law, it “cannot be done in a way that means people do not enjoy the same rights”. In our view, that is not equality, that is a negation of legitimate rights with assimilative intent.

Overall, the Tribunal concluded:

If this Bill were to be enacted, it would be the worst, most comprehensive breach of the Treaty/te Tiriti in modern times. The Crown would be turning the clock back to 1877 and the decision in Wi Parata that the Treaty/te Tiriti is a ‘simple nullity’. If the Bill remained on the statute book for a considerable time or was never repealed, it could mean the end of the Treaty/te Tiriti.

What have Ministry of Justice officials said about the policy underlying the bill?

The Ministry of Justice prepared a Regulatory Impact Statement on this policy. This is a standard process designed to assist the cabinet in considering new laws or other proposed regulations. They provide a high-level summary of the problem being addressed, the options and their associated costs and benefits, the consultation undertaken, and the proposed arrangements for implementation and review. The Regulatory Impact Statement on the Treaty principles policy can be found here.

In relation to the policy underlying the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill, the Ministry of Justice advised:

The final content of the principles in the proposed Bill is yet to be determined and it might be possible to develop principles that align with established law and the spirit and intent of the Treaty/te Tiriti.

However, their description in the policy proposal is inconsistent with the Treaty/te Tiriti. It does not accurately reflect Article 2, which affirms the continuing exercise of tino rangatiratanga. Restricting the rights of hapū and iwi to those specified in legislation, or agreement with the Crown, implies that tino rangatiratanga is derived from kāwanatanga. It reduces indigenous rights to a set of ordinary rights that could be exercised by any group of citizens.

An interpretation of Article 2 that does not recognise the collective rights held by iwi and hapū, or the distinct status of Māori as the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, calls into question the very purpose of the Treaty and its status in our constitutional arrangements.

The status quo also provides a higher degree of certainty about what the Treaty principles are and how they operate in New Zealand law. The existing principles have been developed over years of jurisprudence and by the actions of successive Governments. Defining the principles of the Treaty/te Tiriti in legislation might provide a level of clarity about the intent of Parliament when it refers to the principles, but it could also introduce more uncertainty into our constitutional arrangements because it would unsettle the established jurisprudence about the effect of the principles.

What happens next?

The bill has been referred to the justice select committee. This is a committee made up of 11 MPs that includes representation from all the parties in parliament. The committee will gather information and prepare a report on the bill for the House of Representatives. That report may include recommendations for changes to the bill.

The justice select committee is due to report back to the House by May 14, 2025. MPs will consider the committee’s report and then will vote to determine whether the bill continues to the next stage of the law-making process.

How can I have my say on the bill?

The select committee will call for public submissions on the bill to inform their report. Anyone can make a submission on the bill. There is no required form of submission, and they do not need to be long or detailed.

If you wish to make a submission, one approach might be to set out whether you support or oppose the bill, then provide the reasons for your position, and then suggest specific recommendations of changes to the bill, if you have any.

Submitters can also ask to speak to the committee. This could be in person or online. The committee will decide who it will hear from and how that will be managed. If you do wish to speak, individuals will usually only be allocated five minutes to speak to the committee and organisations may be allocated 10 minutes.

There is guidance on making a submission here. Following the online submission process on parliament’s website and using the online submission form is a relatively easy way of making a submission.

The justice select committee page is a good place to view the bill, see when submissions open, watch the proceedings of the committee, and find other information about the bill. The justice select committee page can be found here.

Why should I bother making a submission when the government has already said the bill won’t become law?

It is important that there is strong and visible opposition to the bill so that it is clear to politicians that there is no political advantage in progressing it. Groups who are opposed to recognising Te Tiriti and Māori rights are campaigning to try to persuade the National Party, in particular, to continue its support for the bill. Just as we did with hīkoi, we need to continue to demonstrate the overwhelming opposition to this bill.

Dr Carwyn Jones (Ngāti Kahungunu) is Pūkenga Matua (Lead Academic) of Ahunga Tikanga (Māori Laws and Philosophy) at Te Wānanga o Raukawa, and Honorary Adjunct Professor, Te Kawa a Māui (School of Māori Studies) at Te Herenga Waka Victoria University of Wellington.

E-Tangata, 2024

SOURCE

Photo credit: supplied to E-TANGATA

agenda 21/30, Medical Industry

Major Alert: New Zealand Government is Enshrining ‘Medical Mandates’ in Law

January 6, 2025 Pam Vernon 4 Comments

From Hatchard Report

There is a revolution in progress, and it is not a bloodless revolution.

The Gene Technology Bill introduced to Parliament this week includes the following provisions:—

Mandatory medical activity authorisations: for a human medicine that is or contains gene technology that has been approved by at least two recognised overseas gene technology regulators.
Emergency authorisations: when there is an actual or imminent threat to the health and safety of people or to the environment, for example, threat from a disease outbreak, or an industrial spillage. The Minister responsible for the Gene Technology Act (the Minister) will have the power to grant an emergency authorisation.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

These clauses bypass the medical choice provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights.

They violate the conclusions of Phase 1 of the Royal Commission on the pandemic which found that vaccine mandates hurt people and the economy.

They pre-empt the findings of Phase Two of the Royal Commission which has yet to examine the safety of COVID-19 vaccines produced via gene editing.

It empowers the Minister to make health decisions affecting all Kiwis on the say-so of foreign gene regulators of his choice.

The Bill is being passed under Fast Track legislation designed to prevent public discussion of its controversial provisions and adequate understanding of its impact by MPs. There is no time sensitive need for this.

The Bill ignores the experience and lessons of the last five years of the pandemic which has been a gene technology disaster responsible for 30 million deaths worldwide. Its logic is therefore incomprehensible even to well-informed observers, but it appears to find echoes in a dark history:

“The sun shines” wrote Christopher Isherwood in his 1930s Berlin Stories “and Hitler is the master of this city. The sun shines, and dozens of my friends are in prison, possibly dead.” As are too many of my friends recently, young and old alike.

Following the 1933 Nazi acquisition of power, Germany underwent a rapid and sweeping revolution that reached deep into the fabric of daily life. At the beginning, it occurred quietly and out of sight of most of the population. At its core was ‘enabling’ legislation that empowered the government and its appointees (read: regulators) to take far reaching decisions on behalf of the whole population. Its core aim was Gleichschaltung—coordination—designed to bring citizens, government ministries, universities, cultural and social institutions inline with Hitler’s extreme beliefs and attitudes.

Today we are facing efforts aimed at global coordination of technology, including biotechnology, food tech and information technology. The New Zealand government appears very willing to play a leading role in this revolution, whatever the implications. We have reported on these previously at length (here, here, here and here).

In addition to the prospect of government reimposition of medical mandates, the Bill does not require labelling of gene altered foods. As this flies in the face of all the canons of food safety and traceability established over the last 100 years, the only possible motivations are either a desire to deny consumers any right to preferences, or a wish to avoid any safety monitoring or culpability. Not only will we be unable to exercise medical autonomy, but we will no longer know what we are eating. This is an extraordinary and frightening prospect and not just for those who struggle with allergies. Food choice is not the prerogative of the government or bioscientists no matter how sure of themselves.

Something absolutely fundamental and personal is being taken away from us

This Bill is being promoted and steered by Judith Collins, with the full support and encouragement of the Prime Minister Chris Luxon and the leader of the ACT Party David Seymour. Collins is a lawyer and long time Parliamentarian, she will fully understand the import of the Bill. As a previous leader of the National Party who lost an election, it is hard to escape the suggestion that Collins may be taking satisfaction from the imposition of her will on those who rejected her leadership. We have all heard stories of waiters who piss in the awkward customer’s beer and laugh behind their backs. I am sorry to draw such a gross comparison, but my sense of outrage demands it.

The Gene Technology Bill seeks to institute a revolution, it spits in the face of the public who suffered during the pandemic and who voted in a new government with the thought that things might change. Instead we appear to have more of the same or worse. The refusal of Health New Zealand to publish up to date health statistics such as those for cancer incidence, speaks volumes about a government determined to avoid any accountability, even at the expense of public health. For the record, US insurance data reveals that cancer incidence has had a steady and unremitting upward trajectory since the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. Ignored by our government and worse: covered up.

There is a time for everything and a season for every purpose under Heaven. A time to be born and a time to die, Now is the time to lobby your MP and let them know exactly what you think. Time to make our voice heard.

Please write to your MP before the summer break brings consideration to a close and put a note in your diary to follow up afterwards. This fight is winnable.

SOURCE

Photo Credit: pixabay.com

Corporations, Surveillance

Spy My Media: Pfizer’s top owners — Blackrock, Vanguard & State Street — are top shareholders of parent companies that own Annalect, hired by NZ’s Govt to spy on Kiwis’ social media

January 6, 2025 Pam Vernon 2 Comments

Another excellent and informative read about ‘the club’ that you’re not part of … note, the NZ corporation (aka govt) was spying on this site a few years back keeping tabs on pesky environmentalists (Archives link). Lest you think they wouldn’t! … (other posts on NZ spying) … EWNZ

From Steve Snoopman @ Substack

In this exposé, Steve Snoopman shows the Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street Connection behind New Zealand Government’s out-sourcing of social snooping to the same big three Monopoly Board Players that own Pfizer.

The company hired by the NZ Government to monitor New Zealanders’ social media accounts, produce data analytics and ‘social listening’ reports for the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) is called Annalect New Zealand.

Annalect is part of the New York-based Omnicom Group — whose top three owners are Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street — and who are also the top three shareholders of Pfizer, the primary pharmaceutical company that has supplied the New Zealand Government with its Covid-19 mRNA-nano ‘vaccine’, Cominarty.

During the Corona Plandemic, one of Omnicom’s advertising agency, Clemenger BBDO, created the NZ Government’s ‘Unite Against Covid-19’ campaign, which contained four functions of ideology that are essential for successful propaganda to brainwash a population.

Key Finding: Under the ‘corporate umbrella’ of Omnicom Media Group (OMG), the NZ Government has been able to manipulate the thoughts, feelings and understandings of the archipelago’s captive population by out-sourcing social snooping to Omnicom, whose top three owners reveal the ‘Blackrock-Vanguard-State Street Connection’ to Pfizer.

This dispatch was originally published 5 May, 2022 on Snoopman News.

Pimp My Shot: Pfizer’s top owners — Blackrock & Vanguard — are top shareholders of parent companies that own The NZ Herald, Newshub & Newstalk ZB

January 5, 2025 Pam Vernon 1 Comment

Another excellent and informative read …

From Steve Snoopman @ Substack

In this exposé, numerous New Zealand newsrooms, including The New Zealand Herald, Newshub and Newstalk ZB are shown to share the same ultimate owners as the pharmaceutical manufacturer, Pfizer.

Among the top three owners of New Zealand Media and Entertainment (NZME) — which owns The New Zealand Herald, The Waikato Herald, The Bay of Plenty Times, The Whanganui Chronicle, The Manawatu Guardian, The Northern Advocate, the Bay of Plenty Times and The Roturua Daily Post, and NewsTalk ZB — are three transnational banks, JPMorgan Chase Bank, CitiGroup and HSBC.

The top three owners of JPMorgan Chase Bank and CitiGroup include the two massive financial institutions, Vanguard Group and Blackrock, that in turn are among the top three shareholders of Pfizer.

The news brand, Newshub, as well as The Project, The Nation, and ChannelThree are owned Discovery New Zealand, that is a subsidiary of the media corporation, Discovery Inc., and which is owned by the parent corporation, AT&T. The two biggest owners of AT&T, are Blackrock and Vanguard.

NZME and Discovery are deeply embroiled in the New Zealand Government’s drive to jab 90% of the eligible population. Yet, like other newsrooms, NZME and Discovery have failed to seriously investigate the other side of the story — in keeping with the priniciple of freedom of expression.

This dispatch was originally published 26 October, 2021 on Snoopman News.

Pharmageddon Pts 1 & 2 (Steve Snoopman)

January 4, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

Two good long reads to educate yourself on pertinent plandemic health matters going forwards…

From Steve Snoopman Edwards @ substack

Pt1: How masked bandits in the US FDA, NIH & CDC used Gilead’s Remdesivir to democide ‘Covid-19 patients’

Former Māori Television news and current affairs editor, Steve Snoopman, proves that US health officials and the drug’s manufacturer, Gilead Pharmaceuticals, knew that remdesivir caused multiple organ failure, including impairing kidney function, before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s emergency use authorization of May 1 2020.

“The anatomy of medical democide inflicted upon an unwitting American people under the rubric of the so-called global pandemic, is shown in this heretical investigation. The mass execution of patients with courses of an alleged anti-viral drug, remdesivir — occurred under the direction of health officials.”

Read more at THE LINK

Pt 2: V is for Variant Voodoo. Vax trials pre-date emergence of first 4 major Corona Variants — Omicron an Ominous Orchestrated Omen?

Citing doctors, Steve ‘Snoopman’ finds that the global mass ‘vaccine’ programs were a live product demonstration to show that the mRNA technology worked. This proof of concept global experiment was predicated on the top-down universal decision to use synthesized mRNA that would instruct cells to mass manufacture spike protein in the manufacture of Covid-19 injecticides.

This heretical investigation shows the correlations between countries that hosted Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ trials prior to four of the five biggest ‘variant outbreaks’ emerging in the very same nations of interest. In the cases of the first four variants — Alpha, Beta, Delta and Gamma — the ‘variant outbreaks’ surged in the nation of interest amid mass ‘vaccine’ roll-outs.

However, in the case of the Omicron variant, a variation on the ‘variants epistemology’ occurred. The widely reported ‘emergence’ of ‘Omicron’ in Botswana and South Africa were attributed to the date of November 11^th and 12^th of 2021, respectively.

Read more at THE LINK

Big Oil, Corporations

Speculators, Cartels & Myths of Scarcity

January 3, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Dean Henderson

Establishment economists love to pretend that inflation is a product of supply and demand. But today’s high prices are instead the product of increasing economic concentration of power amongst greedy landlords, industry cartels and Wall Street/City of London speculators.

Back in 2013, as if to justify his Libyan crusade, President Obama echoed the prevailing “peak oil” myth, stating that “we must accept the new reality that from here on out, demand for oil will always exceed supply”. It was music to the ears of the Rockefeller/Rothschild energy cartel and tax-dodger oil traders in Zug, Switzerland alike. Both know full well that oil companies pay around $18/barrel to get crude out of the ground.

Big Oil rings up its usual quarterly record profit, speculators led by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley tack on another $50/barrel and people get gouged at the gas pump. Governments “tighten their belts”, economies contract and the myth of scarcity (root word: scare) encourages a race to the bottom for the global masses, alongside an historical concentration of power and wealth by the well-fed and fueled global elite.

A day after Obama’s endorsement of concentrated corporate power and casino capitalism, the US Department of Energy reported that the main US oil stage depot at Cushing, Oklahoma was holding 41.9 million barrels of crude oil, very near its capacity of 44 million barrels. In other words, the US is awash in crude oil.

Here in South Dakota, the USDA announced that farmers plan to plant an additional 850,000 acres of corn- the most since 1931. According to a March 10 bulletin from USDA, Brazil’s corn crop is 2 million tons higher than last year. Yet corn futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange trade at record prices.

According to the same USDA report, “U.S. wheat ending stocks for 2010/11 are projected higher this month on reduced export prospects. Projected exports are lowered 25 million bushels with increased world supplies of high quality wheat, particularly in Australia, and a slower-than-expected pace of U.S. shipments heading into the final quarter of the wheat marketing year.” Yet wheat futures hover near record highs.

There is nothing alarming in the report about supplies of beef, poultry, eggs, milk, sugar or rice either. Yet food prices continue to skyrocket.

The global elite know that both food and energy are paramount to life. Control over these two most basic needs means control over people.

After the 2008 acquisitions of Swift, Smithfield and National Beef Packers by Brazilian meat-packer JBS, there are three conglomerates that control over 80% of beef-packing in the US – Tyson, Cargill and JBS. These same companies control most of the burgeoning cattle feedlot industry centered in SW Kansas and SE Colorado. They also dominate the pork, chicken and turkey industries. Cargill is the largest grain processor on the planet, handling a full one-half of global grain supplies.

Four giant companies are making a play to own not just all the oil, but virtually all energy sources on the planet. In my book, Big Oil & Their Bankers…I dub them the Four Horsemen – Royal Dutch/Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco and BP Amoco.

These companies control crude oil from the Saudi well-head to the American gas pump and profit from every step of processing, shipping and marketing in between. While reactionary Republicans blame environmentalists for the lack of US oil production, it was these oil giants who capped permitted wells in Texas and Louisiana and moved production to the Middle East – where Bangladeshi, Filipino and Yemeni workers are paid $1/day to work the oil rigs.

Royal Dutch/Shell and ExxonMobil are the heaviest and most vertically integrated of the Four Horsemen. These behemoths have led the charge towards horizontal integration within the energy industry, investing heavily in natural gas, coal and uranium resources.

With the fall of the Berlin Wall, Eastern Europe, Russia, the Balkans and Central Asia were opened to Big Oil. According to Kurt Wulff of oil investment firm McDep Associates, the Four Horsemen, romping in their new Far East pastures, saw asset increases from 1988-94 as follows: Exxon Mobil-54%, Chevron Texaco-74%, Royal Dutch/Shell-52% and BP Amoco-54%. The Rockefeller/Rothschild Oil Cartel had more than doubled its collective assets in six short years.

Russia and Central Asia contain over half of the world’s natural gas reserves. Royal Dutch/Shell has led the way in tapping these reserves, forming a joint venture with Uganskneftegasin at a huge Siberia gas field in which Shell owns a 24.5% stake. Shell has been the world’s #1 producer of natural gas since 1985, often via a joint venture with Exxon Mobil.

In the US retail natural gas sector Chevron Texaco owns Dynegy, while Exxon Mobil owns Duke Energy. Both were key players – alongside Enron – in the 2000 natural gas spikes that battered the economy of California and led to the bankruptcy of that state’s main utility provider, Pacific Gas & Electric. Exxon Mobil has extensive interests in power generation facilities around the world including full ownership of Hong Kong-based China Light & Power.

During the 1970s Big Oil invested $2.4 billion in uranium exploration. They now control over half the world’s uranium reserves, key to fueling nuclear power plants. Chevron Texaco and Shell even developed a joint venture to build nuclear reactors.

Exxon Mobil is the leading coal producer in the US and has the second largest coal reserves after Burlington Resources, the former BN railroad subsidiary which in 2005 was bought by the DuPont family-controlled ConocoPhillips. Royal Dutch/Shell owns coal mines in Wyoming through its ENCOAL subsidiary and in West Virginia through Evergreen Mining. Chevron Texaco owns Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining.

Seven of the top fifteen coal producers in the US are oil companies, while 80% of US oil reserves are controlled by the nine biggest companies. Both Royal Dutch/Shell and ExxonMobil are hastily buying up more coal reserves.

Concentration of power across the energy spectrum is not limited to the US. In Columbia, Exxon Mobil owns huge coal mines, BP Amoco owns vast oilfields and Big Oil controls all of the country’s vast non-renewable resources. In 1990 Exxon Mobil imported 16% of its US-bound crude from Columbia.

The Four Horsemen have invested heavily in other mining ventures as well. Shell holds long term contracts with several governments to supply tin through its Billiton subsidiary, which has mines in places like Brazil and Indonesia, where it is that country’s largest gold producer. Billiton merged with Australia’s Broken Hill Properties to become the world’s biggest mining conglomerate – BHP Billiton.

Shell also enjoys cozy relations with the world’s 2nd largest mining firm – Rio Tinto – through historically interlocked directorates. Holland’s Queen Juliana and Lord Victor Rothschild are the two largest shareholders of Royal Dutch/Shell.

Shell recently began investing heavily in the aluminum industry. Shell Canada is Canada’s top sulphur producer. Shell controls timber interests in Chile, New Zealand, Congo and Uruguay and a vast flower industry with farms in Chile, Mauritius, Tunisia and Zimbabwe.

Recently, Shell’s BHP Billiton tentacle announced a $38.6 billion hostile takeover attempt of Canada’s Potash Corp. BHP Billiton already owns Anglo Potash and Athabasca Potash. Ownership of Potash Corp. would give them control over 30% of the global potash market. Potash is a necessary component in growing any agricultural crop.

BP Amoco, through its ARCO subsidiary, has become one of the world’s top six producers of bauxite, from which aluminum is derived. It has mines in Jamaica and other Caribbean nations.

Chevron Texaco controls over 20% of the huge AMAX mining group, the leading producer of tungsten in the US with extensive holdings in South Africa and Australia.

Exxon Mobil owns Superior Oil and Falconbridge Mining, Canada’s largest producers of platinum and nickel, respectively. Exxon also owns Hecla Mining, one of the world’s top copper and silver producers, and Carter Mining, one of the top five phosphate producers in the world, with mines in Morocco and Florida. Phosphates are needed to process uranium, while phosphoric acid is key to petrochemical production, which the Four Horsemen also control.

Another vehicle for Four Horsemen hegemony in the energy sector is the joint venture. For decades before Chevron merged with Texaco in 2001, the companies had marketed petroleum products in 58 countries under the Caltex brand. They also operated Amoseas and Topco as joint ventures before merging.

Caltex owns refineries in South Africa, Bahrain and Japan. In the Philippines, Caltex and Shell control 58% of the oil sector. When Philippine strongman Ferdinand Marcos introduced martial law in 1972, Caltex Vice President Frank Zingaro commented, “Martial law has significantly improved the business climate.”

Exxon and Mobil also shared many joint ventures around the world prior to their 1999 merger, including PT Stanvac, Indonesia. Royal Dutch/Shell and Exxon Mobil established a North Sea joint venture called Shell Expro in 1964, while in 1972 Shell tied up with Mitsubishi in Brunei to supply oil to Japan.

Shell owns 34% of Petroleum Development Oman in partnership with Exxon Mobil. Saudi ARAMCO, the Iranian Consortium, Iraqi Petroleum Company, Kuwait Oil Company and the ADCO in the United Arab Emirates all represent(ed) Four Horsemen collusion.

In Iran, Iraq and Libya these cartels were nationalized. That’s why the Rockefeller/Rothschild Oil Cartel billed US taxpayers to invade Iraq and Libya, while continuing to threaten Iran. The first oil contract in Iraq went to Royal Dutch/Shell. The 2nd goes to BP and the 3rd to Exxon Mobil. You get the picture.

Both food and energy are paramount to life. That’s why Congress should shut down speculator casinos like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the NYMEX, while nationalizing the Four Horsemen and the monopoly food processors. We should form a US Energy Company and a US Food Processing Company which would focus on renewable energy and healthier diversified diet.

All things are possible if we show political will and are not scared. We should reject “peak oil” and its companion myth of food scarcity and tackle the real problems – concentration of corporate power and speculation.

Dean Henderson is the author of seven books, including, Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf, Illuminati Agenda 21, Nephilim Crown 5G Apocalypse and Royal Bloodline Wetiko & The Great Remembering. Subscribe free to his Left Hook column at deanhenderson.substack.com

Subscribe to Dean Henderson

Launched 2 years ago

Dean Henderson returns to the web with biting insight on the global workings of the bloodline Crown elite.

SOURCE

Image by Alessandro D’Andrea from Pixabay

GMO

NZ’s Gene Technology Bill – Guy Hatchard PhD & Andrew Bridgen | FTI NYE Clip

January 2, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From FreeNZ

Guy Hatchard PhD talks with Liz Gunn & Andrew Bridgen during the Freedom Train International Live broadcast about the Gene Technology Bill being introduced in New Zealand and the negative impacts it will have on our health, wellbeing and freedom.

VIDEO LINK

Guy’s article on his website: “Major Alert: New Zealand Government is Enshrining ‘Medical Mandates’ in Law” – https://hatchardreport.media/new-zealand-government-is-enshrining-medical-mandates-in-law/

Website: www.hatchardreport.com

VIDEO: The Gene Technology Bill — What Kiwis Need to Know: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5b2skQADT4

Banking, News

CBDC: The End of Money: watch the film

January 1, 2025 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

With CBDCs, your money can be switched off altogether

From Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog

This film is a warning to the world.

Disclaimer

I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.

Key points

A new comprehensive film on CBDCs, origins of Bitcoin and the tokenization of all assets worldwide.

Almost every central bank in the world is currently rolling out a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). These are programmable versions of our current national currencies that can restrict what goods you can buy and where you can buy them. With CBDCs, your money can be switched off altogether.

CBDC is about total control

CBDCs represent not only a fundamental revolution in our system of money, but also a devolution or degradation of money. At its core, money has four fundamental characteristics: it is transportable, divisible, readily acceptable, and it is a store of value. CBDCs eliminate two of these attributes. For if money can be programmed as to how and where it can be used by a central authority, it is no longer readily acceptable. And if it can be turned off or lose its value within a certain time period—something several central banks have openly proposed to encourage spending UNCLEAR—it ceases to be a store of value.

Who is driving this effort?

And what is their relationship to other cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, digital IDs, and the tokenization of all assets worldwide? Continue at https://bigpicture.watch/cbdc-the-end-of-money/

Click here to watch the film

Prosperity and freedom or oppression and slavery?

This movie is an in depth inquiry into the direction we are headed if central banks get their way. Extraordinary power over so many people and what do to about it. 1:12:53 minshttps://cbdctheendofmoney.com

What man does not fix, man gets to keep

The film is an opportunity to inform everyone you know, soonest possible. TY!

Thanks for reading Our Greater Destiny Blog! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Without prejudice and without recourse
Doreen Agostino
Our Greater Destiny Blog
gf&es

SOURCE

Photo Credit: pixabay.com

Glyphosate, GMO

Biden Administration and ‘Mr. Monsanto’ Continue to Bully Mexico into Accepting GMO Corn

December 30, 2024 Pam Vernon 1 Comment

by Derrick Broze
From The Last American Vagabond @ substack

EWNZ comment: Of course Monsanto & its poisons never ever went away, as per corporate MO they just morph into another in this case Bayer. They continue, with impunity, to poison us via the food chain. What’s left of it ie as they busily create a famine to expunge us completely. As the saying goes they don’t grasp that we are seeds and burying us in the ground isn’t going to work. Hopefully Mexico can maintain its stance. Not hopeful unfortunately as these corporate bullies simply sue the pants off the non compliant. They are intent on destroying everything. All purity gone. All pure food sources gone. It’s fake meat, bugs and processed everything that they intend for us. If you still think glyphosate (their infamous poison) is harmless as advertised read here.

The Biden administration and Tom “Mr. Monsanto” Vilsack have emerged victorious in their effort to use the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to force Mexico to accept U.S. grown genetically engineered corn.

On Friday, an international trade panel ruled in favor of the United States in their ongoing dispute with Mexico over an attempted ban on imports of American genetically modified (GM) corn.

The Mexican Department for the Economy said it disagreed with the ruling but would follow it. The Mexican government has been attempting to limit the introduction of GM corn to their country because they believe it poses an unreasonable risk to the domestic corn supply, and thus the health of the country’s numerous indigenous communities and farmers who depend on corn.

“The Mexican government does not agree with the panel’s finding, given that it considers that the measures in question are aligned with the principles of protecting public health and the rights of Indigenous communities,” Mexico’s Economy Department told the Associated Press. “Nonetheless, the Mexican government will respect the ruling.”

The U.S. government celebrated the decision. Ambassador Katherine Tai said the ruling “underscores the importance of science-based trade policies”.

The decision was the latest in an ongoing legal battle between the Mexican and American governments over Mexico’s previous calls for banning imports of U.S. GM corn for human consumption. In 2020, former Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) announced plans to ban GE corn for human consumption. This plan was later watered down, but the country did continue their fight against cross-pollination of their world-renowned corn seeds.

In February 2023, AMLO issued a decree announcing an immediate ban on the use of GM corn for dough and tortillas. The order also called on Mexican government agencies to phase out the use of GM corn for other food uses, including animal feed, which is where a majority of Mexico’s current imports of US GM corn ends up.

Mexico is currently the leading importer of GM corn from the US. This fact alone makes Mexico’s efforts to ban or reduce the presence of GM corn a huge potential financial loss for the American industry growing and exporting GM crops.

For the Mexican farmers who have been cultivating corn for an estimated 8,000 years, GM corn represents a significant threat. GM corn can spread via the birds, bees, and wind, resulting in cross-pollination between traditional crops and GM versions.

In response to Mexico’s initiatives, the US established the dispute panel in August 2023, accusing Mexico of violating the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement launched under the first Trump administration. The US brought six legal claims against Mexico, including charges that Mexico’s process for determining that GM corn poses a risk was insufficient and not scientifically sound.

The USMCA dispute panel found in favor of the US on all legal claims, stating that, “Mexico’s measures are not based on science and undermine the market access that Mexico agreed to provide in the USMCA.”

Under the USMCA, Mexico has 45 days to comply with the Panel’s findings.

Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum Responds to the Ruling

One day after the trade panel ruling, Mexico’s recently elected President Claudia Sheinbaum stated that the incoming Mexican Congress will pass a ban on the planting of GM corn.

“We must protect Mexico’s biodiversity in our country. As we say: without corn, there is no country,” Sheinbaum stated.

On the 23rd, Sheinbaum was again asked about the decision by the panel and how Mexico would respond.

“Transgenic corn cannot be sown here in Mexico. There are already decrees, but now we want to take it to the Constitution,” Sheinbaum stated. “And let it be very clear that in Mexico it is forbidden to sow transgenic corn.”

Sheinbaum noted that while she was Secretary of the Environment in Mexico City there was a decree that GM corn cannot be sown in the city. She noted that the Mexico City government made efforts to save native-corn in genetic banks.

Sheinbaum also noted that because of the nature of the corn it makes the farmers less dependent on biotech corporations.

“A part of the corn is saved, that seed is saved and is resown and used in the next harvest. This is very important because it does not depend on the farmer to buy the seed from a transnational company,” she stated. “So, preserving the corn in Mexico, not transgenic, is something mandatory.”

VIDEO LINK

The Mexican Government’s Arguments for Banning GM Corn

The USMCA panel’s main conclusions repeatedly attack Mexico’s ability to decide which products constitute a threat to its peoples and culture. The panel refused to accept Mexico’s national sovereignty and introduction of a “zero risk” policy as legitimate reasons for apparently violating the terms of the USMCA.

Mexico’s agencies found that consumption of GM corn in Mexico could impact human health, and GM corn poses a risk to native corn of “transgenic contamination”. The nation implemented the zero risk policy precisely because “the presence of contaminants and toxins in GM corn grain, such as transgenic proteins and glyphosate, has been well documented.”

“In addition, the adverse health effects of these contaminants and toxins have been scientifically demonstrated,” the Mexican government has previously stated. The government said that it “cannot be coerced into ignoring the independent scientific evidence that indicates the harmful effects of transgenic proteins and pesticide residues in GM corn”.

America’s southern neighbor said current international standards, recommendations, and guidelines are based on industrial agriculture in the U.S. and Canada, and do not address the risks of transgenic contamination and uncontrolled spread of GM to Mexico’s native corn.

Mexico said there was concern about GM corn and Mexico’s native non-GM corn varieties growing together in the same small fields and milpas, a traditional crop growing system which is intrinsic to indigenous ways of life in Mexico.

The Mexican government argued that it was acting in defense of their vast indigenous population for which corn is a part of diet, culture, and spiritual practices. Numerous national and international treaties, as well as national and state laws, were cited by the Mexican government in an effort to show that defending indigenous people is a tightly held legal commitment.

The US government responded by stating that Mexico’s claims of legal obligations to indigenous peoples were actually “vague, highly generalized concepts” such as “protecting the cultural heritage of Indigenous peoples and communities.” The US argued that these “vague concepts” do not constitute a concrete legal obligation.

Biden and Mr. Monsanto Win… For Now

The most strongly worded statement from the Mexican government came in response to the well-known revolving door relationship between U.S. government agencies and the industries they are supposed to regulate. In this case, the incestuous relationships between U.S. regulators and those who work for pesticide companies and producers of GM seeds.

In their rejection of the U.S. governments demands about GM corn, the Mexican government said they would not place the “economic interests of U.S. biotech corporations ahead of people’s health in Mexico”.

Indeed, the decision was praised by members of the biotech industry. John Crowley, CEO of the biotech industry trade group BIO, celebrated the ruling as a “monumental victory for the future innovation of agricultural production technologies.”

The perfect example of this relationship between regulators and lobbyists for the biotech industry is the current US Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, former Governor of Iowa and former president and CEO of the US Dairy Export Council. Secretary Vilsack was appointed by the Biden administration after previously serving as Secretary of Agriculture during the Obama administration.

Vilsack cheered the decision by the dispute panel, calling it a “thorough and impartial assessment” which concluded that “Mexico’s approach to biotechnology was not based on scientific principles or international standards”. Vilsack said the ruling was a victory for “countries around the world growing and using products of agricultural biotechnology to feed their growing populations and adapt to a changing planet.”

Vilsack is notable for being given the nickname “Mr. Monsanto” in reference to his work helping the biotech giant Monsanto Inc, now owned by Bayer. In 2001 the Biotechnology Innovation Organization named Vilsack “BIO Governor of the Year” for “his support of the industry’s economic growth and agricultural biotechnology research” while serving as Iowa’s Governor.

In 2016, Politico reported on Vilsack’s role in accelerating the approval of GM crops during the Obama administration:

“Progressives say they are also disappointed that during Vilsack’s seven-and-a-half-year tenure, the Agriculture Department sped up approval of controversial GMO crops, backed trade deals they say cost Americans’ jobs and cleared changes to let poultry slaughter facilities police themselves, among a slew of initiatives favoring big producers.”

The Organic Consumer Association also reported on the various GM food products approved during Vilsack’s tenure. According to the OCA, while Vilsack was USDA Secretary from 2009 to 2017 he approved more new GM crops than any Secretary before him or since. Here are just a couple examples:

Monsanto’s Roundup Ready sugar beets: A judge ruled that inevitable contamination would cause the “potential elimination of farmer’s choice to grow non-genetically engineered crops, or a consumer’s choice to eat non-genetically engineered food.”
- Monsanto’s Roundup Ready alfalfa: The first genetically modified perennial crop. By the end of the Obama administration, it had gone wild, costing American alfalfa growers and exporters millions of dollars in lost revenue. Vilsack’s long-term relationships with the biotech industry should be a warning sign for the Mexican government, and a clear sign of where his allegiances remain.

Vilsack’s habit of moving between government and industry continued during his absence from government under Donald Trump. Forbes recently reported:

“In February 2017, Vilsack joined an organization that the agriculture department helps fund, called the U.S. Dairy Export Council. As its chief executive and president, Vilsack promoted dairy products overseas. He also communicated with the Department of Agriculture, reaching out to his successor, Sonny Perdue. The work paid well, as revolving-door positions often do. During the four years Vilsack led the organization, he earned an estimated $3.6 million.”

There are questions surrounding Vilsack’s ownership of a farm and conflicts of interest with farming programs he oversees at the USDA. Forbes notes that the majority of Vilsack’s $4 million net worth comes from his farm which gives him “personal insight into the ag industry—and potential conflicts of interest as the head of the USDA.”

One clear example is the Conservation Reserve Program which pays farmers to refrain from planting and harvesting on sensitive land. In the first months back in the White House under Biden, Vilsack announced an expansion of the program and raised the rates it pays to farmers. Vilsack has reportedly collected thousands of dollars of subsidies from his farm as part of the program.

The Mexican Government Continues to Oppose GM Crops

Despite the US government’s repeated claims that Mexico’s policies on GM crops are not based in science, the Mexican government has offered numerous studies and reports outlining their view.

For example, in March 2023, Mexico’s National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT) hosted an online webinar laying out the science behind the nation’s decision to ban imports of GM corn. The webinar itself was a response to repeated claims by the U.S. government that Mexico positions to GM corn are not based on science.

CONACYT, the Mexican government’s senior science department, organized several presentations from Mexican scientists detailing the health concerns surrounding GM food and the herbicide glyphosate which is typically sprayed on GM corn produced by Bayer, formerly Monsanto.

During his presentation, Alejandro Espinoza Calderón, director of Mexico’s biosecurity agency Intersecretarial Commission for Biosafety and Genetically Modified Organisms (Cibiogem), noted that,

“Mexico has a rich store of exceptionally healthy varieties of corn. It is alarming to find that 90 percent of tortillas were shown to have traces of both glyphosate and transgenics. The biosecurity of Mexico is of utmost importance.”

National University biologist Ana Laura Wegier Briuolo, a biologist at Mexico’s National University made it clear that “without healthy corn we cannot have healthy people.”

During the webinar Dr. Omar Arellano, from the National University’s Ecology and Natural Resources Department, shared data from Mexico, Argentina, and the United States, detailing how glyphosate impacts human health. “The science is much clearer now than it was twenty years ago,” Arellano stated.

The Last American Vagabond Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

SOURCE

Covid-19 experimental injection

NZ doctor exposes ‘Perverse’ monetary incentives to vaccinate and ‘hush money’ aid to victims’ families

December 29, 2024 Pam Vernon 6 Comments

From the events of the past 4 years in NZ

From RAIR Fnd. USA via seemorerocks.is

“Just five weeks ago, New Zealand had a so-called “vaxxathon,” a kind of festive campaign, with the sole purpose of giving as many people as possible a shot. Dr. Monchy reported that one health center made 175,000 NZD (105,000 euros) during that vaxxathon.”

By Amy Mek

Veteran New Zealand doctor René de Monchy’s career came to an abrupt halt after refusing to be vaccinated. Wanting to remain “vaccine-free,” the physician of over 48 years was fired, banned from his hospital, and not allowed to say goodbye to his patients.

The general practitioner and psychiatrist is shining a spotlight on the Globalist forces using Covid to help them seize control of New Zealand. The brave doctor questioned why doctors and patients receive monetary “vaccine” incentives. Furthermore, Dr. Monchy believes the actual number of people who have died from the vaccines is not reported, and relatives of those killed from the injection are receiving “hush money.”

“At some point, it dawned on me: this is not so much about health, but more about politics, money, power, and social manipulation.” – Doctor René de Monchy

Critical From The Beginning

From their inception, Dr. Monchy was very critical of the “experimental, never-before-used mRNA vaccines.” The Doctor disagreed with the vaccine’s “lack of a control group and long-term outcomes,” reports the Doctors Collective. Even more so, the Doctor is outraged that the injection is being promoted to children and pregnant women,

…what closed the door for me was when the vaccines were also given to children, who are absolutely not at risk with corona infection. In addition, the mRNA vaccines were also promoted for pregnant women, which is completely contrary to any medical and scientific tradition of carefully weighing the pros and cons. The immune system, especially of a child, is a delicate interplay. It is like a symphony orchestra with several sections; the winds, strings, and percussion, all of which must fill in at just the right time. By administering vaccines whose effects are still largely unknown, you are going to disrupt this interplay. We have every reason to be cautious.

“Peverse”Monetary Incentives

Since the arrival of the gene-therapy injections, New Zealand has pushed to have 90% of its population receive two injections. In December, the country successfully reached its milestone. To achieve its 90% “vaccination” goal, Dr. Monchy explained that every citizen who received the injection was bribed with a voucher of 20 NZD (12 euros). At the same time, doctors have been given 359 NZD (216 euros) per vaccine.

Just five weeks ago, New Zealand had a so-called “vaxxathon,” a kind of festive campaign, with the sole purpose of giving as many people as possible a shot. Dr. Monchy reported that one health center made 175,000 NZD (105,000 euros) during that vaxxathon. “There is a perverse incentive for doctors to participate in this kind of campaign,” stated the Doctor.

No Vaccine Exemption

Vaccine exceptions were initially allowed in New Zealand, but were soon withdrawn by the government. The only exception now is if someone has suffered anaphylactic shock or a pulmonary embolism after the injection, explains the doctor. “I have had patients who suffered a stroke or Guillaume Barré after the first injection. But what do you think? No exception was given for a second vaccination.”

Similarly, in Australia, Senator Gerard Rennick condemned his government for forcing citizens to take a second shot if they suffered an adverse event from the first.

Chance Of Fine Or Jail

Those who don’t get pricked are demonized as anti-vaxxers and increasingly socially excluded. Since November 18, an unvaccinated person is no longer allowed to work in health care, education, or air and sea transport. Following the introduction of the Corona Pass on December 3, the unvaccinated are no longer welcome in hospitality, sports, cultural events, and non-essential stores. Those who fail to comply risk a fine of NZD 12,000 (€7210) or six months in prison. We have become a segregated society, explains Dr. Monchy.

Because the Doctor works in healthcare, he was also required to get vaccinated. On the day the deadline passed, the manager called him in her office. She asked if he had been vaccinated. He replied, “no.” Immediately his computer account and swipe card were blocked. He was unable to say goodbye to patients and colleagues. He received a restraining order from the hospital, “like a hooligan receiving a stadium ban,” stated Dr. Monchy.

One of the doctor’s closest colleagues told him that there is no talk about the people forced to leave the hospital. The doctor’s co-workers are afraid of losing their livelihoods. The rumor is that doctor’s medical licenses will be revoked, which has already happened to three colleagues.

The doctor is sporadically working under the radar. He sees patients through teleconsultations. His only hope is to continue doing the work he loves.

Posthumous PCR Positive

At the onset of the corona crisis in early 2020, the doctors were initially shocked by the extreme outlook we were presented with, states Dr.Monchy. However, it soon became apparent that the mortality rate was much lower than predicted; in New Zealand, exactly 46 people have died from Covid-19 from January 2020 to date, according to official statistics. Anyone who dies within 28 days of a positive PCR test is counted as a corona death, regardless of other circumstances. Recently, the police in New Zealand shot and killed a criminal. Posthumously, the PCR test turned out to be positive. As a result, he, too, went down in the books as a corona death explains the Doctor.

Leaders Do Not Care About Peoples Health

Standard ways of improving health are not encouraged, such as diet, exercise, and fresh air, but rather suppressed. Moreover, any dissent by doctors is being dealt with harshly, either in the media or through the Medical Councils (professional organizations), states Dr. Monchy. “At some point, it dawned on me: this is not so much about health, but more about politics, money, power, and social manipulation.”

Globalists Have Seized Control Of New Zealand

New Zealand is a testing ground for international organizations wanting to roll out systems worldwide, explains Dr. Monchy. For example, credit cards and PIN payment (EFTPOS) were first introduced in New Zealand. In addition, the country is remote and easy to manage, as the population is generally accommodating.

The Doctor slammed the country’s globalist Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern,

She is intelligent, but also shrewd woman, who has mastered political maneuvering to her fingertips. After the attack in Christchurch, she was able to count on much goodwill among the population. Ardern has a degree in communications which you can see, she knows how to play to the masses. What has also helped her is that the press was completely in her hands, and still is by the way.

Jacinda Ardern is closely connected with World Economic Forum (WEF) and was its selected Young Global Leader. RAIR Foundation USA recently reported on her and the Young Global Leaders school, which was established and managed by Klaus Schwab of the WEF. Arden, like many of the school’s famous for Covid dictator attendees are exploiting the pandemic with the aim of crashing national economies and introducing a global digital currency.

Arden’s Labour party has an absolute majority in parliament. The Doctor explains that this allows Arden’s party to publish laws on Thursday, and her government will quickly and quietly push them through on Monday. The leader operates at a pace that the public is supposed to struggle to keep up with.

The Prime Minister has already said that there will be no end to vaccines. The latest Covid-19 law is far-reaching: the Minister of Health can declare a location an emergency area, after which agencies have the right to enter a home, test the people present, and provide mandatory “treatment.” All court cases brought against this type of measure, up to the Supreme Court, have been lost.

“It would be a mistake to think that this system is unique to New Zealand or that only here will it be so extreme.” I think the system is only being perfected here before it is introduced in other places, explains the Doctor.

Powerful international organizations, such as the WEF are out to bring about an overall social transformation. A new plan is launched almost every week in our area, such as a general smoking ban. So much is unknown, but what the Doctor feels sure about is, “so much power should never be in the hands of a government.”

“It is fascinating but creepy to see how a small group of people around Jacinda Ardern have taken control of this country,” states the Doctor. He questions why a majority of the population goes along with this?

Why do we allow ourselves to be split into “good citizens” and the “anti-vaxxers” or “outcasts”? I have noticed that it is precisely the more intellectual people who fall for it. That includes, unfortunately, many fellow physicians, when you cannot possibly maintain that this regime of vaccines and measures is good for public health. I think the scale of the deception certainly has something to do with it. It is simply too big to grasp. The moment you see through it, you lose much of what you have assumed to be valid up to that point. Intellectuals have more invested in the system; they, therefore, have more to lose. Perhaps our greatest fear is that we will lose our minds. To give up confidence in this corona system is maddening; many people do not yet dare to do so.

Sums Of Hush Money

According to official figures, 117 deaths have been reported as “possibly associated” with the Pfizer vaccine, of which only one case has been assessed as “probable.” The rest are still under investigation, or the deaths were dismissed as “not related to the vaccine.”

These are entirely different figures reaching us through the unofficial route, explains the doctor. We have collected 220 cases via next of kin in which the vaccine is most likely the cause of death. For example, a healthy 50-year-old man or a 15-year-old youth died a day after their shot. He reports that “there are indications that relatives are being offered sums of hush money.”

History Repeating Itself

The doctor grew up in the Netherlands and was conceived around the liberation. His father was active in the underground, helping Allied pilots to escape. But, of course, this was dangerous, so his family lived in a certain tension.

During his childhood, the war was never far away. He grew up playing in the bomb craters in the street. His family regularly discussed the war in their home; it was not taboo. Dr. Monchy’s father described how the occupying forces gradually tightened the thumbscrews: “identification requirements, more and more restrictions, then excluding entire groups.” Exactly as is happening now in New Zealand and elsewhere worldwide, explained the doctor. Unfortunately, it is the known way to take control, as history has repeatedly shown.

Hope For New Zealand

The doctor has not lost hope and praised activist organizations like Voices for Freedom for doing fantastic work in New Zealand. Demonstrations are held in many cities almost every week and attract hundreds or even thousands of people. The Globalists can only suppress human beings for so long stressed the doctor,

You have to remember that our “opponents” see us as interchangeable, as expendable units. For everyone the same vaccine. For all the world the same QR system. There is no place for our sense of self in their human vision. But this clashes with the uniqueness of the human being. You can suppress the sense of self for a while, but not for very long. Once people have rediscovered themselves, they start to see the seriousness of the current situation and the turnaround comes.

In April 2021, doctors, dentists, pharmacists and veterinarians set up an organization, New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science. Their group objected to pharma companies actions and the harsh consequences they faced for voicing their concerns,

Our group formed around an open letter to the New Zealand government that expressed our concerns with the Pfizer Comirnaty Covid-19 injection, as well as the implication from our regulatory bodies that we would be considered incompetent in our duties if we provided fully informed consent about this procedure.

The organization is growing quickly as hundreds of doctors, nurses, and other paramedics have been fired for being vaccine-free – they deliberately do not call them “unvaccinated.” When the first side effects of the gene therapy injections appeared, people noticed that their complaints were brushed aside, as was the personal experience of nurses in hospitals. Their organization tries its best to help these brave individuals.

Seeking Connection

Many colleagues Dr. Monchy speaks to express open doubts about the harsh corona policy in private. They wonder whether the measures still have to do with public health. The doctor is glad that they are expressing their doubts and seeking a connection with other medics. “For myself, I will remain true to my principles. I stand for individual freedom and responsibility, for ‘Respect for Life.’ No one can judge me on that.”

Three years on: workplace discrimination continues against thousands of New Zealanders

December 29, 2024 Pam Vernon 2 Comments

By Ursula Edgington, PhD

More than two years after all covid19 policies were dropped… qualified, experienced Kiwis remain excluded from jobs they love

I’ve written before – extensively – about the totalitarian policies of the Ardern Government that imposed coercive ‘vaccine’ mandates on most public sector workers, and commercial entities too. For instance, here, here, here and here. But what is happening today, three years on. And what the hell can we do about it?

Many people are sceptical of the forthcoming NZ Gov Covid Inquiry, including the conflicts of interest of the Commissioners involved and the recent expansion of its Terms of Reference, to include the ‘vaccination’. Those of us who sat through some of the harrowing but censored scenes from witnesses to the Scottish Covid Inquiry, may also be wondering how on earth the essential evidence from these hearings, gets ‘out there’. And with our continued effort and support, it will. Eventually.

Meanwhile, here in NZ, there remains numerous examples of the >3 years old policies rigidly still in place. This is despite the High Court judgment against the NZ Defence Force confirming jab mandates an unreasonable imposition on our Human Rights.

Protests about the jab mandates (image from 2022)

Why we can’t ‘move on’.

To highlight the extent of the problem, I’m providing a ‘snapshot’ – eight job vacancies – advertised with covid ‘vaccination’ requirements (screenshots included):

Support Worker for ‘Nurse Maude’

This job involves caring for people with disabilities in the community. That means intimate care and overseeing meals and medications, including weekend work. This company claims:

“Our reputation for delivering consistently high-quality home support and nursing care is due in no small measure to the experience, professionalism, commitment, and sheer drive of our people. We are seeking experienced support workers to join our Homecare team across Christchurch.”

They are paying the minimal wage (or just above) for these ‘experienced, professional’ carers. That’s NZ$23.38 p/h. Oh, and only those who have had ‘ at least’ two doses of a ‘vaccine’ for a ‘flu’ that is now five years old. The mind boggles…

‘Facilitator’ working for Maori ‘charity’ and Public Private Partnership (PPP) Ngāti Porou Oranga,

This entity is a ‘charitable trust’ and subsidiary of Te Rūnanganui o Ngāti Porou. They claim to be “an integrated Hauora, Housing and Whānau Oranga (support services) provider…” and this role involves working with offenders and their families. It is full-time, and looks extremely demanding. This is from the job description:

To be successful in this role, you will have:

Great people skills and ability to build rapport/ Previous experience working in a community work type role
TPO accreditation, social work registration, and/or restorative justice accreditation an advantage
A positive attitude and a passion for working with people
Excellent time management and organisational skills/ Excellent planning, report writing, and documentation skills
Ability to work calm under pressure/ Maintain confidentiality at all times

Operating Competencies:

Full, clean NZ Driver License/Excellent oral and written communication skills.
A proven leader with self-motivation and initiative.
High level of organisational skills/Able to establish a good rapport with people.
Proficient computing skills/ Trustworthy and confidential. But don’t forget, if you want to apply:

Readers familiar with the story by now won’t be surprised to read Ngāti Porou Oranga’s Annual Report in Charities Services confirms last year, their income was nearly $30million, with most of that funding sourced from, you guessed it, the NZ Ministry of Health for ‘services rendered’.

Next? While paradoxical images of Trump flipping burgers whilst promoting MAHA are fresh on our minds, and we’re on the subject of wealthy tax-exempt commercial giants, let’s look at a job at McDonalds:

Housekeeper: shift-worker at a Ronald McDonald’s House for families with sick kids.

Screenshot from this article.

The role includes cleaning, stock management and liaising sensitively with guests. And states explicitly:

“COVID-19 Vaccination: In order to maintain a safe and healthy work and accommodation environment and minimise the risk of Covid-19 transmission, RMHC New Zealand recommends that all employees and volunteers are fully vaccinated against Covid-19.”

Are we stuck in a timewarp here?

Community Nurse (Awhi Services) for Tui Medical

Again, this is a demanding, full-time job, requiring high level expertise and qualifications in nursing. The pay is only $70,000 – $89,999 per year. Requirements:

Be eligible to work in New Zealand
Be registered with the Nursing Council of New Zealand
Have a current practicing certificate with the Nursing Council of New Zealand
Be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (!!!)
Have previous experience in Primary Healthcare setting or Community Health
Be interested in nursing in a Primary Health team who have a focus on working with and improving the health outcomes for Maori and Pasifika clients
Have an understanding of the importance of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, Te Ao Maori and other cultural competencies
Desirable attributes are Independent Vaccinator, Smear taker, with experience in B4S’s, phlebotomy and managing chronic conditions. (my emphasis)

In addition: “The successful candidate will demonstrate the ability to work in a variable workflow environment, build strong report with team members, have good communication and interpersonal skills, and a positive “can do” attitude.” Sound like you? The advert asks. (are they taking the piss?)

The problem for many (mandated-out) healthcare professionals looking at this job, is not only are they not ‘vaccinated’ but they no longer hold an Annual Practising Certificate (APC). Nurses have been unfairly blacklisted and discriminated against for over three years; without an APC they are at risk of a Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal and cancellation of Nursing Council registration. Again, Tui Medical is a PPP – taking large sums from taxpayers’ funds to pay for interventions like covid jabs and ‘worried well’ tests that no-one wants. I’ve written about that topic previously, eg here and here.

Photo from a meeting of mandated healthcare workers. Credit: NFFNZ

‘Well Child’ Nurse for Southseas Healthcare Trust, Auckland.

The purpose of the position is to offer a screening, surveillance, education and support service to all New Zealand children/ Pacific and their family from birth to five years old. The position provides a child-centered comprehensive service that focuses on improving child health, social and educational outcomes.

This is a nursing role focused on Islander [Pasifika] families: “Purpose: To contribute to the overall management of Child Development by providing expert nursing care, as necessary. To provide expert nursing care ensuring excellent health and improved child growth and development.” The role demands high level quals and experience, oh and at least THREE doses:

Healthcare Worker for Seibbor Healthcare Limited

This role is caring for a woman in her 40’s who has suffered a stroke. The part-time hours are just above minimal level. The employer states:

“Evidence of Covid-19 vaccination would be an advantage.”

I wonder why?

A Registered Nurse is required at an aged-care facility in Hastings.

Apparently for this shiftwork job “We have a competitive remuneration package, as well as a wonderful culture.” Other attributes include:

Administrator Role, Kirikiriroa for Pathways.

For those unfamiliar with the word Kirikiriroa it’s the Maori name for Hamilton (apparently). Incidentally, in an attack of wokeness by Council similar to that seen overseas, Hamilton’s statue was removed from the centre of the city ‘for safety reasons’. Anyway, that’s another Kiwi rabbit hole! Pathways is a nationwide provider of mental health support organisations providing a wide-range of services:

The requirement for this office-based role states at least three doses of the experimental jab are required for all employees:

Other discriminating organisations

Meanwhile Student Nurses are still subject to jab mandates at Waikato University. Student Midwives are still subject to covid injection mandates at Auckland University of Technology (AUT). Defence Force recruits are also subject to ‘vaccination’ mandates. The madness seems endless.

And this isn’t limited to healthcare vacancies, a factory job in a commercial bakery also insists on jabbed applicants only:

The purpose of this post about NZ job advert snapshots is to point out that:

a) staff shortages continue in healthcare and other sectors

b) these shortages could be lessened, if discriminatory (and quite frankly, ludicrous) ‘vaccine’ mandate requirements were removed.

c) Our New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (BORA), Anti-Discriminatory laws, the Privacy Act and most Employment legislation aimed at fair equality have all apparently been abolished, without a single word from the Human Rights Commission, professional bodies or the judiciary (to name a few).

Solutions!

Back in July 2022 the shortage of healthcare staff was causing tension when mandates were still in place. In response to the current, ongoing and unacceptable situation, Nurses For Freedom NZ (NFFNZ) Founder Deborah Cunliffe, explains how:

“The MOH and Health NZ implicated unvaccinated nurses as being unprofessional and unfit to work putting our communities at risk due to vaccine refusal. The MOH and Health NZ now need to bring healing to our nursing community by righting the wrongs and correcting the information. Strong leadership is needed. The messages that were given need to be rescinded otherwise we will continue to see mandates by proxy.” (my emphasis)

Helpfully, NFFNZ suggest two ‘Actionable Solutions’ :

1. A Governmental apology clearing all nurses, carers, midwives (students) of any wrongdoing in refusing the ‘vaccine’ – hence limiting the ongoing prejudice against us not only by employers but also by our professional communities and colleagues i.e. nursing council & nursing unions.

2. A clear consistent message from Government and Health New Zealand that any action by employers or professional associations discriminating against unvaccinated workers will be looked on unfavourably and subject to BORA/ law. This information needs to be disseminated to training institutions (ie AUT, Waikato University), contractors, those who are paid by Te Whatu Ora to provide services (ie private hospitals, GP Clinics) etc and include lower management in Health NZ ie Charge Nurses who still think unvaccinated nurses cannot be employed despite policy.

I remain an optimistic informed heart. But my patience is paper thin: when will our coalition Government acknowledge the elephant in the room and stop this illegal discrimination? How can our healthcare systems and patients recover from this?

Informed Heart is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Vaccines

Can schools just vaccinate children against the parents’ and child’s wishes? Vermont’s Supreme Court said yes

December 28, 2024 Pam Vernon 2 Comments

From The Federalist via Dr Meryl Nass @ substack

Editor’s comment: remember this post?

WHO now deems your child’s presence in school as informed consent to vaccinate them (it’s called ‘implied consent’)

Will the US Supreme Court weigh in on this issue?

The Supreme Court only takes 1% or less of cases it is asked to decide. This is a critically important case the court needs to take.

Parents Appeal to US Supreme Court after Vermont Courts Ruled Schools Can Vaccinate Kids Against Parents’ Wishes

A Vermont family whose 6-year-old son was vaccinated with an experimental Covid-19 intervention against the family’s wishes has appealed a Vermont Supreme Court ruling. The Vermont court had ruled that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) prohibits such claims, granting immunity to school and government personnel when they mandate vaccinations.

Stunningly, the Vermont Supreme Court did not even pay lip service to the constitutional liberties implicated, ruling against traditional protections of parental rights and informed consent. But the PREP Act is not above the Constitution’s supremacy clause; it’s the other way around.

Parents’ rights are being chiseled away rapidly. In Vermont, minor children may obtain transgender hormones and birth control without parental consent, and a 2024 law bars parents from seeing which library books are checked out by their children 12 years and older. Yet these are examples where the child wants something against his parents’ wishes. In Vermont’s Covid-19 vaccination case, the child protested and was forced to be jabbed anyway.

Leo’s Case

According to the Supreme Court petition, for which I was the lead attorney, Tony and Shujen Politella and their son Leo were shocked that their clear expressions of opposition to Leo being vaccinated were ignored. Tony had visited his son’s school with the express purpose of ensuring his child would not receive a Covid-19 vaccine, offering to keep Leo home on the day of an upcoming clinic. He was assured Leo would be fine, but instead Leo was given an arm tag displaying another boy’s name and vaccinated despite his vocal protests.

It was a further insult when the public school, which was eligible to obtain monetary “awards” from the state of Vermont based on vaccination rates, provided no explanation for how such a gross error occurred, as Mrs. Politella related in her testimony. Leo transferred to a private school the family trusts. Yet a third injury was inflicted when the Vermont attorney general and Vermont court system employed laws designed to grant product liability immunity to Big Pharma to instead insulate incompetent government employees from accountability for their wrongs.

Vermont’s appalling Politella decision threatens every child in America. Other courts may rely upon its implied federal preemption of family rights and extinguishing of informed consent rights. As Ninth Circuit Judge Daniel Collins recently opined in a concurring opinion in a related ruling: The “‘right of a competent individual to refuse medical treatment’ was ‘entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions,’ in light of ‘the common-law rule that forced medication was a battery, and the long legal tradition protecting the decision to refuse unwanted medical treatment.’”

Other State Rulings

This common-sense recognition of such fundamental rights has been absent from supreme courts in Wyoming and Nevada in addition to Vermont, as well as the Kansas Court of Appeals and federal courts in Kentucky and Oklahoma. A North Carolina case involving a football player vaccinated against his wishes is also making its way up the court system ladder.

Congress never intended for the PREP Act to abolish fundamental medical ethics or the legal rights of patients and parents. The PREP Act does not shield public servants from accountability for actions that have nothing to do with vaccine safety or efficacy. The Politellas did not sue a vaccine manufacturer for a harmful product; they sued school officials who inflicted very real harm.

All American children are constitutionally entitled to the protections of informed parental consent. Should these abhorrent court decisions stand, “vaccine hesitancy” may be joined by “public school hesitancy.” The distrust of vaccines and pharmaceutical companies engendered by Covid-19 policies extends to schools and courts that favor negligent or ill-willed workers over the rights — and health — of young children.

John Klar is an attorney, writer, pastor, and farmer. John blogs for Mother Earth News on agriculture issues and writes a column for Vermont’s True North Reports. His Substack is Small Farm Republic. He is also the author of “Small Farm Republic: Why Conservatives Must Embrace Local Agriculture, Reject Climate Alarmism, and Lead an Environmental Revival.” John is also on our Door to Freedom team!

SOURCE

RELATED:

EWNZ Note: be informed, and educate your children. In NZ I have been watching developments during & since the recent covid scam era, as our understanding and perceptions of our true rights and options regarding medical treatments and our right to decline have been seriously eroded. With this in mind we have had what appear to be drills happening with many threats of gunmen & bombs in schools requiring lock downs where parents were not permitted to call or to go into schools to retrieve their children, one parent arrested even. With that scenario was also the right for schools to administer any ‘required’ medical treatments. For two must reads on topic go here and here.

Children of NZ parents who had declined the HPV vax were taken aside at school, told their parents didn’t love them and coerced for their consent

WHO now deems your child’s presence in school as informed consent to vaccinate them (it’s called ‘implied consent’)

Image by cromaconceptovisual from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection

Here’s how VAERS covers up the C19 jab mortality

December 28, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Dr Ana Mihalcea MD, PhD @ substack

In this episode (video link), I speak with VAERS expert Albert Benavides about the ongoing VAERS data fraud. He shows evidence of how the system is being scrubbed to cover up true injury and mortality rates. Albert’s current shocking estimates for global mortality are at 35 million dead. This is a Genocide unfolding.

EWNZ NOTE: Remember the estimates calculated from VAERS are only less than 5% of the real total, the reason being, it’s been shown that less than 5% of populations actually report to VAERS. Dr Mihalcea mentions this in the video. Must watch. See also the cover up in Aussie. And let’s not forget how they silenced NZ’s whistleblower, smartly. Raided, arrested, charged, censored. And right now in NZ, they are continuing to coerce folk to take the ‘safe & effective’, whilst saying that during the last round ‘we chose and were not coerced’ (according to our ‘leaders’ via lamestream media). They have now ensured that next time, dissidents will meet with stronger measures to comply.

Albert Benavides is a twenty-five-year Medical Billing Revenue Cycle Management Expert, former HMO Claims Auditor and medical billing company owner. He now runs his own website, vaersaware.com visualizing VAERS using corporate style interactive dashboards. Sadly, after auditing VAERS for three years, my conclusion is CDC/FDA uses VAERS to run cover for big pharma.
For more information for Dr Ana Mihalcea:
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD is a board-certified Internal Medicine Physician with a PhD in Pathology and over 20 years of clinical experience. She is the President of AM Medical LLC, an anti-aging
clinic dedicated to the reversal of all diseases. She is the Award-winning Author of the book “Light Medicine – A New Paradigm – The Science of Light, Spirit and Longevity” (www.arthemasophiapublishing.com). She is also the founder of Tru Blu Medical, developer of Blue Light Wellness wraps (www.trublumedical.com ). You can reach her website for research updates and treatments at https://www.dranamihalcea.com/
Dr. Mihalcea writes Humanity United Now Substack Newsletter – discussing topics like dangers of C19 injectables, Long Covid, vax injury reversal, self-assembly nanotechnology and more
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/.
Her research field is C19 vaccine shedding, therapeutic approaches including metal detoxification and disabling self-assembly nanotechnology. She serves on the Board of Directors for the National American Renaissance Movement
https://nationalarm.org/board/.
She is also an Advisor for https://www.targetedjustice.com/

VIDEO LINK BELOW

https://rumble.com/v593ffx-vaers-coverup-of-covid19-bioweapon-mortality-conversation-with-albert-benav.html

RELATED:

30 Million excess deaths, 1.5 Billion injured Globally via the experimental Gene therapy Trump shot
https://old.bitchute.com/video/XloxlLdAGntK/

Business is Booming Six Feet Down Under
https://nzdsos.com/2024/07/16/business-is-booming-six-feet-down-under/

COMPELLING EVIDENCE THE AUSTRALIAN TGA BLOCKED REPORTING OF SERIOUS VAX EFFECTS
https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/compelling-evidence-the-australian?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1301027&post_id=147440796&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3zn&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

They Are Covering Up Cov Vax Deaths and Injuries Says Ambulance Workers and Nurses
https://australiannationalreview.com/health/they-are-covering-up-cov-vax-deaths-and-injuries-says-ambulance-workers-and-nurses/?fbclid=IwAR1BkTIeMDS2KizT4H4u3K6HxftNwt3PmowFRFkCSJFIBoFTzZmuQ3fb9IA

They Want to Kill You: Here’s How they’ll do it
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hJJqK6ohv9uf/

Vaccines

MAJOR STUDY: Chronic illness & deadly diseases such as cancer, are virtually non-existent in people “who’ve never received a vaccine in their life”

December 27, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From slaynews.com via Exposing the Darkness @ substack

A major peer-reviewed study has concluded that chronic illness and deadly diseases, such as cancer, are virtually non-existent in people “who’ve never received a vaccine in their life.”

By Frank Bergman December 18, 2024

A major peer-reviewed study has concluded that chronic illness and deadly diseases, such as cancer, are virtually non-existent in people “who’ve never received a vaccine in their life.”

The study compares rates of chronic disorders – such as heart disease, diabetes, cancer, developmental disabilities, and autism – among unvaccinated Americans with those vaccinated with a varying number of vaccines.

The team of researchers, led by scientist Joy Garner, found that unvaccinated people have far lower rates of illness and death.

The study’s lead author also notes that vaccine trials use faulty baselines, as their control groups do not consist of wholly unvaccinated individuals.

“Because 99.74% of the U.S. population is vaccine-exposed, published national disease rates invariably reflect the frequency of observed negative outcomes arising from exposure to vaccines,” Garner explains.

In the “Abstract” section of the study, the author notes that “those refusing vaccines are thriving while those accepting them are being injured and met with a multiplicity of grave injuries as well as sudden unexpected death.”

The results of the bombshell study were published in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Vaccine Research.

However, the journal has scrubbed the study’s paper without explanation.

A copy of the study’s paper has now been published by Slay News here.

The apparent cover-up of the study has meant that the findings have gone unreported in the media.

However, renewed attention has been brought to the study following a recent interview between attorney Greg Glaser and Dr. Lee Merritt which highlights the findings.

Glaser, the general counsel for Physicians for Informed Consent, notes that the study shows “the unvaccinated are the healthiest people on the planet.”

The cohort study analyzed “unvaccinated” Americans.

The group of “unvaccinated” only included those who have never received a single “vaccine” in their lifetime.

The strict criteria also meant those whose mothers did not receive any “vaccines” while they were in the womb.

The study notes in the “Abstract” section:

“The null hypothesis, that no significant difference would be found between vaccinated vs. unvaccinated persons in heart disease, diabetes, digestive disorders, eczema, asthma, allergies, developmental disabilities, birth defects, epilepsy, autism, ADHD, cancers, and arthritis, is rejected with overwhelming statistical confidence and power in every single contrast.”

In fact, Glaser notes that “the unvaccinated today are as healthy as children were in the 1950s before all the shots.”

“I participated in a control group survey where we looked at the health of the genuinely unvaccinated children who’ve never received a vaccine in life and adults who’ve never received a vaccine,” Glaser says.

“There’s approximately 100,000 adults in America who’ve never received a vaccine in their entire life.”

“We looked at the unvaccinated and compared [them to vaccinated Americans and the] unvaccinated are virtually entirely healthy for life,” Glaser adds.

“Their chronic illness rate among [unvaccinated] children is approximately 2%.

“That means 98% of all children who are unvaccinated are healthy for life.

“Like, they don’t have anything,” he notes.

“They don’t have ADHD, diabetes, obesity, asthma, epilepsy, cancer.

“We found zero of these things, with the exception of some minor [ADHD].

“Like, you’d find, like, maybe a little bit of ADHD, but then it was just that one condition.

“Whereas in the vaccinated group, you find that multiple children have many conditions, and the conditions are severe.”

VIDEO LINK

Partial transcript:

“Can you believe it? They’re out there.

“There’s approximately 100,000 adults in America who’ve never received a vaccine in their entire life.

“Dr. Merritt, you have done your homework. That is correct.

“Yeah [that means even their mothers didn’t receive a ‘vaccine,’ including the vitamin K shot].

“And, and that’s very important.

“The vitamin K shot has benzyl alcohol, which a baby’s liver cannot handle, and it also has a spike of aluminum, which is also not good for a baby.

“And so what we did is we compared the health of these two groups.

“Our national data on just people’s illnesses, diabetes, heart disease, other forms of chronic illness that just make life really hard.

“And we looked at the unvaccinated and compared that, and the unvaccinated are virtually entirely healthy for life.

“Their chronic illness rate among the children is approximately 2 percent.

“That means 98 percent of all children who are unvaccinated are healthy for life.

“Like, they don’t have anything.

“They don’t have ADHD, diabetes, obesity, asthma, epilepsy, cancer.

“We found zero of these things, with the exception of some minor.

“Like, you’d find, like, maybe a little bit of ADHD, but then it was just that one condition.

“Whereas in the vaccinated group, you find that multiple children have many conditions, and the conditions are severe.

“And so the data was clear to us that the unvaccinated are the healthiest people on the planet.

“And the way it made sense to me was that I looked at our national data from the 1950s and it matched the unvaccinated.

“Like, basically, the unvaccinated today are as healthy as children were in the 1950s before all the shots.”

Source: slaynews.com

Photo credit: pixabay.com

Glyphosate, GMO

Now Pushed Fake Meat Is All About Controlling the Food Supply

December 27, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Dr Mercola

Video Link

Story at-a-glance

I spoke with “Tea Time,” a program by Children’s Health Defense, about the dangers of fake meat products to help raise awareness about this latest assault on human health
Fake food — including lab-grown meat, animal-free dairy and plant-based meat — is the globalists’ latest attempt to control the food supply
The globalists are trying to replace animal husbandry with lab-grown meat, which will allow private companies to effectively control the human population
The idea that animals must be removed from agriculture to save the planet is flawed; animals are an integral, and necessary, part of the restorative process
Fake meat is an ultraprocessed mixture of chemicals, GE ingredients, pesticides and toxic linoleic acid that will promote chronic disease

Editor’s Note: This article is a reprint. It was originally published March 12, 2023.

At face value, fake meat sounds like the perfect solution to end world hunger, protect animal welfare and save the planet from environmental destruction. Even a brief look below the surface reveals a much more nefarious reality, however.

To help raise awareness about this latest assault on human health, I recently spoke with host Polly Tommey on “Tea Time,” a program by Children’s Health Defense, about the dangers of fake meat products.¹

Fake Meat Is All About Controlling the Food Supply

Fake food — including lab-grown meat, animal-free dairy and plant-based meat — is the globalists’ latest attempt to control the food supply. Former U.S. Secretary of State and national security adviser Henry Kissinger once said, “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control people.”² Controlling people is their whole agenda.

The globalists have long held a monopoly on the grain industry with their patented genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In the early 2010s, not many people knew about GMOs. In 2011, we started to educate the public about their dangers, as they posed a major threat to public health and the environment.

In 2012, a ballot initiative was launched in California to require mandatory labeling of genetically engineered (GE) foods and food ingredients. The initiative was narrowly defeated due to massive donations from multinational corporations, but we won in the long term because awareness of GMOs in the food supply significantly increased. Now, most health-conscious people avoid GE/GMOs.

A similar trend is now occurring with fake food. The globalists are trying to replace animal husbandry with lab-grown meat, which will allow private companies to effectively control the entire food supply.

Fake Meat Is Even Worse Than CAFOs

Many people are aware of the pitfalls of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) — unnatural diets of GMO grains, crowded conditions, inhumane treatment, excessive pollution and rampant spread of disease. CAFOs are bad — but the new fake food era is going to be even worse.

With their patented fake meat products, the globalists will have unprecedented control over people’s health.³ It sounds noble to try to provide for the entire world’s population using animal-free methods, but it’s a deception.

Will Harris is a regenerative farming pioneer who runs White Oak Pastures in Bluffton, Georgia. He produces high-quality grass fed products, including beef and other animal products, in a way that’s good for consumers, the environment and the financial health of his business. While the globalists are spinning the idea that animal foods are destroying the planet, when raised regeneratively the way Harris does, this is far from the truth.

It’s the fake foods that will ultimately jeopardize the environment. “We are sequestering 3.5 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent for every pound of grass fed beef we sell. Ironically, the same environmental engineers did an analysis on Impossible Burgers,” Harris said on “The Joe Rogan Experience.” “They’re emitting 3.5 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent.”⁴

Save This Article for Later – Get the PDF Now

Download PDF

Regenerative Farming Beats Fake Foods

Impossible Foods, along with Beyond Meat, is a major player in the fake meat marketplace. It claimed to have a better carbon footprint than live animal farms and hired Quantis, a group of scientists and strategists, to prove its point. According to the executive summary, its product reduced environmental impact between 87% and 96% in the categories studied, including land occupation and water consumption.⁵

This, however, compares fake meat to meat from CAFOs, which are notoriously destructive to the environment and nothing like Harris’ farm. Harris commissioned the same analysis by Quantis for White Oaks and published a 33-page study showing comparisons of White Oaks Pastures’ emissions against conventional beef production.⁶

While the manufactured fake meat reduced its carbon footprint up to 96% in some categories, White Oaks had a net total emission in the negative numbers as compared to CAFO-produced meat.

Further, grass fed beef from White Oak Pastures had a carbon footprint that was 111% lower than a typical U.S. CAFO, and its regenerative system effectively captured soil carbon, which offset the majority of emissions related to beef production.⁷

“The WOP [White Oak Pastures] system effectively captures soil carbon, offsetting a majority of the emissions related to beef production,” the report stated. “In the best case, the WOP beef production may have a net positive effect on climate. The results show great potential.”⁸

So, the idea that animals must be removed from agriculture to save the planet is entirely flawed. In fact, animals are an integral, and necessary, part of the restorative process.

What Is Fake Meat?

Fake meat is marketed as a health food, but it’s nothing more than a highly ultraprocessed mixture of chemicals. Impossible Foods, for instance, uses genetic engineering to insert the DNA from soy plants into yeast, creating GE yeast with the gene for soy leghemoglobin.⁹

Impossible Foods refers to this compound as “heme,” but technically plants produce non-heme iron, and this is GE yeast-derived soy leghemoglobin.¹⁰ Heme iron only occurs in meat and seafood. Impossible Foods’ GE heme is used in their fake meat burgers as a color additive that makes the product appear to “bleed” like real meat.

The health effects of GE heme are unknown, but this didn’t stop the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from approving soy leghemoglobin in 2019. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) filed a lawsuit challenging the approval, which they called “unusually rapid”¹¹ and risky for public health.

In their lawsuit, CFS points out that soy leghemoglobin is produced using synthetic biology, or “genetic engineering on steroids,” which does not shuffle DNA pieces between species but instead constructs new biological parts, devices and systems that do not exist in the natural world.¹²

The reason why Impossible Foods turned to synthetic biology to produce GE soy leghemoglobin is because it couldn’t extract enough of the substance directly from soybean roots to produce its fake meat products on an industrial, mass-produced scale. The FDA GRAS for soy leghemoglobin is 526 pages long, if that gives you any idea of the industrialized complexity of this so-called GRAS “health” food.¹³

Beyond Meat is similarly industrially processed. Beyond Burger patties contain 22 ingredients. Among them are expeller-pressed canola oil, pea protein isolate, cellulose from bamboo, modified food starch and methylcellulose¹⁴ — hardly “health” foods. To morph these ingredients into a patty that resembles meat require further processing.

It’s revealing, too, that while truly natural foods cannot be patented, Impossible Foods holds at least 14 patents, with about 100 more pending.¹⁵

Impossible Foods’ Fake Meat Is Loaded with Glyphosate, LA

Considering that many ingredients in fake meat products are made from GE soy,¹⁶ it’s not surprising that they’re also contaminated with the herbicide glyphosate. Consumer advocacy group Moms Across America (MAA) commissioned Health Research Institute Labs (HRI Labs), an independent laboratory that tests both micronutrients and toxins found in food, to determine how much glyphosate is in the Impossible Burger and its competitor, the Beyond Burger.

The total result of glyphosate and AMPA, the main metabolite of glyphosate, in the burgers was 11.3 parts per billion (ppb) in the Impossible Burger and 1 ppb in the Beyond Burger.¹⁷

When the concerning results were revealed, Impossible Foods engaged in a smear campaign to try and discredit MAA, labeling the group of moms “an anti-GMO, anti-vaccine, anti-science, fundamentalist group that cynically peddles a toxic brew of medical misinformation and completely unregulated, untested, potentially toxic quack ‘supplements’ …”¹⁸

The glyphosate in fake meat is one issue. The excess amounts of omega-6 fat in the form of linoleic acid (LA) are another. In my opinion, this metabolic poison is the primary contributor to rising rates of chronic disease. It’s important to realize that fake meat alternatives do not contain healthy animal fats. All the fat comes from industrial seed oils like soy and canola oil, which are top sources of LA.

Eliminating ultraprocessed foods from your diet is essential to keeping your LA intake low, and this includes fake meat.

‘Precision Fermentation’ Isn’t Natural Either

Fake food companies want you to believe their products are natural because they’re made with components of plants, even though nothing like them exists in nature. Precision fermentation is another term used by the biotech industry to piggyback off the popularity of truly health-promoting natural fermentation.

Precision fermentation, however, is nothing like its natural counterpart. What is perhaps most disturbing about the use of precision fermentation is that companies are allowed to claim that it’s natural.

Metabolic engineering is a major subset of precision fermentation, which involves methods such as next-generation sequencing, high-throughput library screening, molecular cloning and multiomics “to optimize microbial strains, metabolic pathways, product yields, and bioprocess scale-up.”¹⁹ It sounds just like something down on the farm, doesn’t it?

Whether it’s called precision fermentation, gene editing, GMO or something else, don’t fall for the hype that it’s good for you or the planet.

Where Should You Get Your Meat?

If fake meat isn’t healthy, and CAFO meat isn’t a good choice either, a reasonable question is where can you find meat that’s beneficial for your health and the planet? The answer is to get to know a farmer in your area. Visit the farm and view how the animals are being raised.

Get to know the resources available to you within your local community. The community will naturally validate the vendors who are raising food the right way. If you can’t find a local farm for ruminant animals like cows, buffalo or lamb, look for certified organic options at your local grocery store. However, it’s best to stay local and find a source of real, whole food near you.

As much as you can, plant a garden for vegetables, grow fruit trees and even raise chickens if it’s allowed in your area. For the food you can’t source on your own, lean on your community to fill in the gaps.

Just as was the case with GMOs, raising awareness about the dangers of fake meat is also important, especially in this early and aggressively expanding phase. Tell your social circle that to save the planet and support your health, it’s necessary to skip all the fake meat alternatives and opt for real food instead.

When you shop for food, know your farmer and look for regenerative, biodynamic and/or grass fed farming methods, which are what we need to support a healthy, autonomous population.

Sources and References

SOURCE

Image credit: Pixabay.com

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Lawyers who work for Government: how NZ School Boards fired unjabbed teachers

December 26, 2024 Pam Vernon 6 Comments

From Ursula Edgington, PhD

Unstitching what happened to the New Zealand teachers who were sacked as a result of the NZ COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 is proving a long and depressing task. But it is essential. This post continues the conversation about what went on behind the scenes when, on Nov 15th 2021, Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins declared all teaching staff should be ‘vaccinated’.

Brief Background to the NZ ‘No Jab, No Job’ Mandates:

I’ve explained previously about how the NZ Government secretly worked with the biggest commercial companies behind the scenes during August and Sept 2021. The ‘pilot scheme’ took place over 6 weeks and involved analysing various coercive strategies, or ‘nudges’, in order to get the maximum numbers of Kiwi folk compliant with the experimental injections. The subsequent ‘staff consultation period’ then, was a sham…

READ AT THE LINK

Weather warfare

Catherine Austin Fitts On Helene: “It’s Not A Natural Event” Says It Is A Giant Land Grab

December 26, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Celia Farber @ substack

From a Tweet by @SenseReceptor on X.

“The goal of this operation and [Hurricane Helene] is an operation, it’s not a natural event…[it] got steered in my opinion,” Fitts says. “The goal of this operation is to take assets and…it’s basically a giant taking…to grab land.”

“The investment banker says:

“We’re having lots of reports of land grab tactics being applied” and adds that the operation “relates to the [U.S. presidential] election.”

“I suspect we’re seeing the White House basically—and, again, this is conjecture—negotiate terms. You know, you’ll get disaster recovery if, you know, you do this, this, and this for the election,” Fitts says.

“The president is saying he’s gonna call back Congress, that there’s not enough money at FEMA to go through the hurricane season, and so they’re strong-arming Congress to come back and basically give the administration what they want on the continuing appropriations process.”

“Furthermore, Fitts says this is also an instance of central bankers attempting to wrangle more control for themselves. “This is all part of installing the digital ID and financial transaction infrastructure you need to assert absolute control,” Fitts says. “And if you look at the patterns, whether it’s the taking or the land grab or other other reports we’re getting out of that area, it looks to me like a lot of assertion of top-down control of counties.”

(Clip linked here.)

I just want to reflect on this a little bit. My thoughts may seem obvious and incomplete but I still want to try to put this down:

The recurring pattern we see, from Pearl Harbor, to JFK’s assassination, to Vietnam, to AIDS, 9/11, Katrina, “War in Iraq,” “Covid” and many more induced events I have not listed, is that the magic trick demands we view all aspects of the US “government” as an incarnated spectral being that can vanish and re-appear at will. The main thing to observe is that it is never protective. The guardians of the gates of culture, the ruling classes, guard and protect the trance state that insists Government could not possibly have known/anticipated/done better etc. They do this in many entrenched ways, including by donning windbreakers, going to the scene, and intoning the “tragedy,” but never who let it happen and how.

It (Government) is all-mighty and good and yet it can’t anticipate, nor prevent any catastrophic events its numerous spectral “enemies” (these days including MAGA, imaginary viruses, climate change and “misinformation” on social media.)

Nixon’s War On Cancer And The Growth Of The HHS-NIH-NIC-CDC Beast

Just one example among millions once could point to:

Kate Middleton, Princess of Wales, getting an annihilating cancer, means (apart from mRNA induced turbo cancer reality) that the entirety of the “cancer research” establishment and apparatus since at least Nixon is bankrupt. It can neither predict, prevent, nor cure most cancers.

But nobody says: “Doesn’t that mean none of your models for causes of cancer were correct?”

Instead, the focus is always in the proper funereal emotions, with special emphasis on how brave everybody is.

Linked here (halfway down the post) is my 2006 article on Peter Duesberg’s decades long battle with the Anaconda, and Fauci, in American “cancer science.” It’s a story about a vindictive mafia.

There you see the pattern: Destroy the best scientists. Then land grab their work and attribute it to your own, controllable scientists. Read more about the Duesberg/Rasnick Chromosomal Imbalance Theory Of Cancer at Dr. David Rasnick’s amazing website here, and you can access Peter Duesberg’s essential works here. These vintage papers cling like Waterford crystal when you read them, compared to the swill of the Covid era’s “scientific literature.”

PEARL HARBOR: Roosevelt’s 9/11

James Perloff on Pearl Harbor is a must read. I also passionately recommend his jaw-dropping “13 Pieces Of The Jigsaw: Solving Political, Cultural and Spiritual Riddles Past and Present.This book contains the blueprint for the endlessly repeated Magic Tricks of the Global Anaconda. The media’s role is usually underestimated, but not by Perloff, not in this book. What he documents about William Randolph Hearst is astonishing.

Hearst only needed to commission and publish crude drawings of foreign enemies, and their supposed dark deeds, raping women and what have you: This sufficed to turn the nation to become hellbent on bloodthirsty revenge in various induced “wars.” Only the technologies have changed, not the essence of the Trick. Manipulate the mass response by creating the calamity, then point away, then start a new war. Repress human liberty. Seize property. Enslave. Give people nourishing moral myths.

1. They plan it and make it happen. Then stand back and start churning allowable mass emotions for the public, via the media. Then only crazy people would oppose what must happen next.

They never explain why or how they let the shocking catastrophe happen.
Congress releases colossal funds and green lights new wars. The “anything they need” part of the Trick.
Recent epoch: Areas destroyed by HAARP fires, hurricanes, and other weather weapons are overtaken by the government, in the name of safety.
Media propaganda keeps all language and brainwaves focused on “Mother Nature,” or “pandemics” or plagues of racism and conservatism. Requires abandonment of all knowledge of the natural sciences, from climate to human biology.
Tech billionaires beckon with a Better Way.
NGOs, including many with religious cover, locked in with colossal government “funding.”

Here’s a clip about the utopian Technocracy movement, one of whose early leaders was Elon Musk’s grandfather. One of the main principles is “Trust The Experts.”

To reduce the sauce even more:

IF WE KEEP NORMAL-THINK HATS ON; These Are NOT Real Questions:

Why did the entirety past and present of all US military budgets, surveillance etc, fail to detect or prevent 9/11? All cameras broken, even at the Pentagon, and so on and so on. Norad. (Bill Binney can answer this in full and everybody who has not seen “A Good American” really should watch it.) (In the beginning, I believed the government narrative. My brain was hijacked.)
Why did Anthony Fauci get paid so much money since 1982, and get to crush so many allegedly wrong scientists, for decades, yet failed entirely to protect Americans from what he claimed was a “virus” called SARS Cov- 2, in 2020? (Again, I mean with Normal Hats on.) Why would people worship him in the middle of a “pandemic” it was his job to “prevent?” I would argue for Stockholm Syndrome, and collective PTSD.
How, in 2024, does the entirely of meteorological prediction fail such that the citizens of Western North Carolina, were not warned of such a devastating “weather” event their entire town might obliterate and explode into mud, loaded with their dead, including children and babies?
How did the Secret Service in 1963 fail to protect JFK from being shot in the head in Dallas?
How did one of America’s great cities, New Orleans, wind up almost entirely under water, in 2005? You can read some basic facts here. The evacuation of 1.2 millions residents, before Katrina hit by then Mayor Ray Nagin seems like a mirage from a bygone era. It was, of course, too little, too late, and Nagin’s role, allegiances, and actions, could be debated for decades.

Prepare for lengthy Wikipedia outtake, from Ray Nagin’s page:Hurricane Katrina

U.S. President George W. Bush and Mayor Ray Nagin meet on September 2, 2005

Main article: Effects of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans

In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina entered the Gulf of Mexico. Early on Friday, August 26, Mayor Nagin advised New Orleanians to keep a close eye on the storm and prepare for evacuation. He then made several public statements encouraging people to leave but promising that if they did not evacuate, “[w]e will take care of you”.^[25] By 10:00 a.m. Saturday, a mandatory evacuation was called for low-lying areas in the surrounding parishes—St. Charles, St. Tammany, Plaquemines, and Jefferson—and a voluntary evacuation for St. Bernard Parish. Nagin had, however, ignored federal and state offers of help and a recommendation to evacuate the entire city. [No citation here. Is this true? CF]

In addition to the parishes’ announcements, President George W. Bush declared a federal state of emergency for Louisiana.

In accordance with the regional evacuation plan, New Orleans, along with the surrounding areas of Jefferson and St. Charles parishes, were given formal voluntary evacuation orders around 50 hours from Katrina’s landfall. This phased approach along with “contraflow“, wherein all incoming interstate highway lanes are reversed outward, ensured that additional vehicles moving onto already congested roads would not create massive gridlock. The local newspaper reported that Nagin stopped short of ordering a mandatory evacuation because of concerns about the city’s liability for closing hotels and other businesses.^[26]^{(That was somehow magically no longer a concern for any US politician in the winter of 2020 when “Covid hit.” They build out the Anaconda black project by black project. CF)}

^{Back to Wikipedia on Nagin:}

After receiving a late night Saturday call from Max Mayfield, head of the National Hurricane Center, Nagin was advised that Katrina was headed to New Orleans. He ordered the city attorney to prepare legal documents for a mandatory evacuation of the city, the first in New Orleans’ almost 300-year history. On Sunday, August 28 at 9:30 a.m., the mandatory evacuation order was signed and communicated to the public. The Superdome was opened as a shelter of last resort, and police went throughout the city with loudspeakers alerting all remaining citizens to head to key pickup points for free bus rides. By Sunday evening 80% of New Orleanians and visitors were evacuated or relocated.^[27]

After the hurricane hit, the federally built and maintained levees collapsed throughout the city. 80% of the city flooded, some areas as high as 20 feet, over rooftops. Food and water became scarce, and looting was common. After hearing reports of this, Nagin criticized the federal and state response on WWL radio, and his passionate outburst went viral.^[^{citation needed}^]

(Note, I think it is significant that it says “citation needed” here. I want to hear it. CF)

In response to a question at a town hall meeting in October 2005, Nagin said: “I can see in your eyes, you want to know, ‘[h]ow do I take advantage of this incredible opportunity? How do I make sure New Orleans is not overrun with Mexican workers?'”^[28]Some Hispanic groups, including the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, criticized Nagin’s statement,^[29] although those attending the town hall meeting reportedly applauded—many believing jobs should first go to locals displaced by the hurricane. Despite this comment, Nagin went on to say this was the city’s biggest economic opportunity and urged New Orleanians to get more comfortable working beside someone who did not look like them, as everyone’s help was needed. During a subsequent interview on Telemundo with Jose Diaz-Balart, Nagin praised the great work Hispanic workers did in New Orleans and said the city would not have recovered without them.^[30]

(Do you see it? The creators of the catastrophe install the “good news” and “good things” that must be in place for the OPS of the future, in this case: Imported migrant populations taking jobs from struggling Americans. They are to be thanked. End of bad emotion, implantation of spell/trance. CF)

“Chocolate City” speech

[edit]

Main article: Chocolate City speech

Shortly after Katrina devastated New Orleans, there were calls for moratoriums on rebuilding certain neighborhoods.^[31] Two weeks after Katrina struck, Nagin took a weekend trip to Dallas to reunite with his family. While there, he was asked to meet with leading New Orleans businessmen to discuss the city’s future. Nagin says he made it clear at the meeting that everyone had a right to return home, a claim contradicted by some businessmen in attendance.

[Highlights mine.]

Katrina Must Be Revisited: It Is The Blueprint For Helene, As AIDS Was The Blueprint For Covid

My sister Bibi is the only person I know who traveled, alone, to New Orleans, after Katrina, to volunteer. She stayed with our father’s friend Humberto Fontova, who exposed Ernesto “Che” Guevara as one of history’s most “bloodthirsty icons.”

Bibi wrote a harrowing, incredible article about her experience and I have asked her to see if she can find it because I would like to publish it.

Ken McCarthy of Brasscheck TV, and “What The Nurses Saw,” made a Katrina expose film but I am unable to find it. I’ll keep trying.

The Anaconda laid the groundwork in New Orleans, for this horrifying model of “land grabs,” and massacre of undesirable populations. Of course, the Anaconda “laid the groundwork” centuries earlier, one could argue, but I mean in the “modern age.”

GeoEngineeringWatch.Org

Caller to InfoWars says there is video proof of the creation of Hurricane Helene, here.

Said proof is here, at Dane Wigington’s GeoEngineeringWatch.org:

At the very least, any mention of a “tropical storm,” “hurricane” or “tornado,” should henceforth be interpreted by all Americans as an incoming HAARP attack, and believe nothing of what media says about it. Assume they are perfectly content to kill you.

“Helene,” got way worse after landfall, in addition to the altered direction. I thought hurricanes were weakened by landfall. No?

Characteristic of The Anaconda is:

New.

Shocking.

Never Before Seen.

Impossible To Anticipate.

Malevolent.

No sign of “nature” as we know her, or ever knew her.

No explanations.

SOURCE

RELATED:

Alexa Calmly Tells Stunned Americans Hurricane Helene Was Artificially Created, By Cloud Seeding

“It Was Also The First Manmade Hurricane In History.” —ALEXA

Avoid the FEMA camps, rescue centers, ships & planes: Hurricane Harvey rescuer reveals shocking info (New updates from recent hurricanes)

HURRICANE HELENE MYSTERY: Weather Modification, Climate Intervention and the Planned Destruction of a Region for the U.S. Government’s Pilfering of Natural Resources: In the wake of Hurricane Helene’s destructive path through North Carolina, a storm shrouded in mystery and suspicion, the true extent of the devastation and its underlying causes have come to light

Death Totals From Helene Do Not Reflect All Recovered Bodies in NC Who’s DMORT

There’s something nefarious going on in the mountains of Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee, where hurricane victims are being left to die; stories emerge of bodies washing up in rural areas

Where is the $24.5 million raised for NC hurricane survivors?

agenda 21/30, News

Have we had enough of the World Economic Forum leading our nations? Heads of government who undermine their nations for the WEF are falling fast

December 24, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

WEF-associated Presidents and Prime Ministers are falling like dominoes, first in Ireland, now Canada, Germany, France, UK. Long gone in NZ and elsewhere.

Dr Meryl Nass

EWNZ comment: clearly with each domino fall they have another schooled in WEF ways to replace them, however, every fall is worth celebrating nevertheless.

Here are two PARTIAL lists of WEF Young Global Leaders, as the WEF has become more cagey about who it has been training:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Global_Leaders — by nation

https://maloneinstitute.org/wef —by year

Here are some of its ALUMNI and the nations they tried to wreck:

READ AT THE LINK

Photo credit: By Hanno Böck – Selbst fotografiert in Basel, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12119903

Important truths about 5G

December 24, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Mark Steele @ SUN substack

Weapons expert Mark Steele explains the weaponry they are using against the public without their knowledge or consent. Clearly they lie about the health risks. Mark took his Council to court and won.

LISTEN AT THE LINK (16 min)

5G A MICROWAVE ASSAULT WEAPON , LINKED TO THE CONTAMINATION IN THE COVID SHOT FOR THE PLANNED E L E – JOIN THE RESISTANCE

5G IS A ELECTRONIC ASSAULT WEAPON AND WE NOW KNOW ITS LINKED TO THE CONTAMINATION IN THE SHOT FOR THE PLANNED MASS EXTINCTION EVENT – BE THE RESISTANCE GET YOU NONE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS FROM INFO@SAVEUSNOW.ORG.UK GET THEM SERVED

agenda 21/30, News

The real reason they are culling your animals – it’s multi layered

December 23, 2024 Pam Vernon 5 Comments

Just this week the UK Telegraph has been warning us of the next possible plandemic, with their eye this time on your pet cat that might be putting us all in danger:

Experts have long regarded pigs as one of the greatest zoonotic threats to public health because their cells allow viruses to mix and mutate, creating new strains capable of causing human pandemics. This is how the 2008/09 H1N1 swine flu pandemic started and it is suspected that pigs in Haskell country, Kansas may have triggered the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic which is estimated to have killed between 50 and 100 million people. Now a new study suggests that pet cats could be just as dangerous – and could provide the bridge that allows H5N1 bird flu to mutate and jump to humans.

We should be very afraid and be looking to getting rid of our pets, or so they’d have us believe. Meanwhile the Guardian is hyping it up by warning all pregnant women who contract bird flu will die!

They’ve actually been targeting cats in NZ and elsewhere for some time now.

NZ’s Tokoroa is hiring a shooter to cull feral cats – watch out for your cat
1080 to be used by Aussie govt to kill 2 million feral cats using aerially dropped 1080-laced sausages

We’ve also been targeting possums, deer, birds, rabbits, tahr and other animals considered by our conservation authorities to be pests. They even reward children these days for their efforts in killing them.Then there’s the NZ poultry farm in the South Island that recently had to have its birds culled to the tune of 80,000 plus.

Predator free 2050 – creating a generation who ‘find killing animals weirdly addictive’

In NZ here we have Pest Free NZ (PFNZ). It fuels the production of 1080 poison a lucrative business. Here begins the unravelling.

The poison 1080 is a deadly poison NZ uses with impunity (has done for 60+ years) claiming it is harmless, breaks down in water and targets pests… it doesn’t. It is a very dangerous poison and Doctors are deterred from reporting 1080 poisoning of humans as one MD found out following the death of a hiker that he reported in 2006. The NZ lab lost her heart!

Two scientists who reviewed more than 100 of DoC’s scientific papers say: “There’s no credible scientific evidence showing any species of native bird benefits from 1080 drops”

(To learn more about NZ’s favourite poison go here and here. Particularly informative is the Graf Boys’ award winning doco called ‘Poisoning Paradise’. Also, find ‘1080 poison’ in the categories drop down box, top left of page, here.)

To throw some light on all of this seemingly senseless culling and the endless hype about yet another ‘flu’ strain that looms ready to kill us all, I draw your attention to an excellent article by Jenese James written in 2018. She uncovers the underlying agenda to much of this.

Jenese describes NZ’s Pest Free agenda in her article, Who is driving PFNZ?:

There is much more to this story that you can research yourself but the core thing here is that NZ is part of a much bigger extremist idea under the guise of protecting biodiversity – or purism as I call it – where everything and anything non native and not productive to human use will be destroyed

What is driving the Pest Free NZ Agenda and the hysteria in eradicating non native species. Answer – International agreements and a global agenda [Agenda 21, 2030] to purge all non native species of animals and plants around the world…

All over the world the word has gone out that all creatures great and small that are not indigenous to that land will be terminated. Its not just New Zealand..

So in the mix of the plandemic threats from lamestream, and the culling of both wild and pet animals, you will see what is really afoot. Do read the whole article.

The plandemic of course kills (pun intended) more than one bird with one stone. They get the next human cull with the new speedily produced, untested, EUA jab designed for whatever deadly disease presents itself (especially targeting those ‘miscreants’ who declined the first one) and they eradicate all of the food sources you may draw on in the coming famine that they will have created by destroying farmers, Bill Gates is hogging all the farm land, promoting fake meat production and targeting all good food like raw milk and home gardens. NZ is currently working on the GM front to feed us unlabeled GM poison without even consulting us. We’ve gotten used to that.

Food Supply Shutdown: Deer, fish, pigs euthanized; crops not planted

On reflection they are actually killing three birds with that one stone. It’s long been rumoured that another long term agenda the poisoners have is that of clearing the environment for mining. You can read about that in the following two articles which go into the purpose of all those recent man made disasters we’re now seeing world wide. It is all interrelated! One of the purposes of those is land grab:

Hawke’s Bay is apparently in need of a ‘managed retreat’: Agenda 2030 and the depopulation of the East Coast

Hawke’s Bay’s ‘managed retreat’ Part 2: Agenda 2030, the depopulation of certain NZ areas & the 1080-mining link

So it’s multi purpose, multi layered rape and pillage by the corporates. All cleverly hidden ‘behind the green mask’, to quote Rosa Koire.

UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL.—-Rosa Koire

Which leads us to the recent revelations about David Seymour’s corporate links to the Atlas Network. You can learn about that here.
In more ways than one it is also ‘cui bono?’

They wish to deceive we the public into thinking they have our best interests at heart. Saving native species, saving us from so called man made global warming by herding us into 15 minute ‘smart’ cities, ensuring we own nothing and are happy.

Fortunately folk have woken up to the agenda & are pushing back.

Photo Credit: Clyde Graf (1080 poisoned deer)

agenda 21/30, News

More on David Seymour’s links to the Atlas Network – from ‘conspiracy’ to fact ?

December 23, 2024 Pam Vernon 3 Comments

“Whether we’re fighting for Te Tiriti or against new coal mines, for tax reform and fair pay, to protect Te Taiao or even just to keep NZ’s stop-smoking programme on track – we all face the same well-funded and well-organised ideological opposition”.

Further to our previous article revealing David Seymour’s links to the Atlas Network, I came across this one recently at Substack by Torfrida Orme (posted at Tapatahi Substack) and was intrigued to see Seymour’s Waitangi 2024 interview with Mihingarangi Forbes. It’s earlier on in the piece with relation to the Treaty Principles Bill, soon after it was introduced.

In it he shifts uncomfortably when asked ‘does the Act Party have any links to the Atlas Network?’ (@ 13 mins this topic begins)

He replies ‘no’, but resorts to the now time-worn and fizzled go-to … ‘conspiracy theory’. Trying unsuccessfully to heap shame on Mihingarangi for descending to such ‘low quality’ information, casting aspersions upon her journalistic ability. Her ability IMO towers well above today’s lamestream endeavours.

Seymour’s own links to Atlas are easily-verifiable by his historical job stints at two Canadian Atlas-affiliated think tanks.

He is clearly there on page 6 of Atlas’s own review document of 2008.

Why is seeing Seymour’s links important now?

Because we appear to have a repeat scenario such as happened in Australia, particularly with regard to the Treaty Principles Bill here and Aussie’s referendum with respect to an indigenous voice in Parliament. (Video links all in the article). Rather than promoting equality for all, it is becoming more apparent that he really is inciting racial division. Going by the Aussie playbook at least. Race is another time-worn tactic. It is the ace card of those who seek to divide and rule. It’s how GB retained control over so many millions in India for so long.

“In all our varied campaigns we are up against the same powerful groups trying to keep hold of their resources. It’s in their interest that we are fragmented.”

The last thing these corporate pariahs want is environmentalists messing up their mining plans. Isn’t it all making sense now?

The article below by Torfrida Orme is a must read IMO.

Remember (quote):

“we all face the same well-funded and well-organised ideological opposition”.

EWNZ

ATLAS – how a right-wing global network is building influence in Aotearoa

Over the last six months it’s become so much clearer what we’re up against.

Whether we’re fighting for Te Tiriti or against new coal mines, for tax reform and fair pay, to protect Te Taiao or even just to keep NZ’s stop-smoking programme on track – we all face the same well-funded and well-organised ideological opposition.

As we plunge into fight-back, it’s worth spending some time to find out more about this opposition, why it seems to have appeared now and how it functions.

READ AT THE LINK

NOTE:

There are some aspects of the source article we don’t agree with however the main thrust is Seymour’s links to Atlas and their agenda. Re climate change. We do recognize there is a change in climate however who is behind that, in our opinion, is not you & I and our alleged use of ‘fossil fuels’, rather it is the well documented practice of weather modification. (Read Elana Freeland’s books on topic and if you can’t do that at least visit our geoengineering pages, main menu). See also Sen Malcolm Roberts exposé. The other aspect I have reservations about is the Fabian Socialists. Barry Smith spoke often of them (including the Mont Pelerin Society). Their original logo is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Read more here. It is quite a web we have to negotiate to get to the truth of things, even moreso in the past few years. There will always be differences of opinion and it’s best we don’t play into the hands of those who seek to maintain rule over us, by building walls in response to their divisive tactics. Rather we need, now more than ever, to put aside those differences (agree to disagree) and unite. They are a few thousand, we are a few billion. They are culling us and intend to continue. EWNZ

agenda 21/30, News

The undemocratic transition to a global, authoritarian political system called Stakeholder Capitalism explained (must see)

December 22, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

From Yellow.Forum via Wirral In It Together

IMO a must see. A not too long doco style presentation of just how Schwab operates & what he has in view for all useless eaters. Not what he calls us openly but we know that’s how we’re classified hence the drive for depop. These characters have infiltrated all govts (corporations in actuality) and they mean for us to own nothing, parading that concept as being inclusive… sharing is caring and all that. Nothing could be further from the truth … it is communism in new garb. Make no mistake, it is tyrannical and evil.. EWNZ

Listen at the LINK

Description
Stakeholder Capitalism is an investigative documentary series about our undemocratic transition away from free-market capitalism to a global, authoritarian political system called Stakeholder Capitalism. Enacted in 2020, Stakeholder Capitalism replaces both Shareholder Capitalism (free-market) and State Capitalism (communism) with a single, universal system that is governed by the World Economic Forum’s exclusive elite members, including the presidents of Russia and China.

In the first episode ‘Our New Political System’, former TV producer and tech entrepreneur, Richard Jeffs, discovers what Stakeholder Capitalism is and how its Inclusive and Sustainable policies are changing our society. Richard also investigates how the ESG corporate credit score forces us to adopt Stakeholder Capitalism.

Please tell us what you think and join the debate by signing up to Yellow.Forum for FREE by clicking on the button in the header.

GMO, News

Analysis of Misinformation in the Gene Technology Bill and Suggestions for Submissions and Discussions (Hatchard)

December 22, 2024 Pam Vernon Leave a comment

By Guy Hatchard

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share.

Alarming Developments in Australia Following Their Gene Deregulation

To win the debate about the Gene Technology Bill, we have to expose the unscientific and misleading claims being parroted by politicians to gain public acceptance of an egregious takeover of our food choices and medical rights.

To do so, we have to not only make clear submissions to the Health Select Committee. But more importantly, persuade our friends, colleagues and contacts of the potential impact and the need for action.

Our task is made clear by a comment from David Farrar, prolific National supporter and Kiwiblogger-in-chief, that needs deconstructing and examination for misinformation. He quotes Judith Collins speaking at the first reading of the Bill as follows:

“Our current regulations for genetically modified organisms are some of the most backward looking in the world. New Zealand has lagged behind other countries, such as Australia, Canada, and England, which have safely embraced these technologies for the benefit of their people and their economies.

“Despite gene technologies having been in use in New Zealand since the 1970s, the restrictive rules and time-consuming processes we have imposed on researchers have made testing and embracing innovation outside the lab all but impossible. But no more. This Government has listened to our research, primary industry, and medical communities and the frustrations that they have felt over many years. Today, New Zealand moves into the present with a safe enabling regulatory regime. The legislation will enable the sorts of innovation that will benefit New Zealand while effectively managing risks to the health and safety of people and the environment.”

Farrar then adds his 25c “After 25 years of dithering, we finally have a Government that is not letting hysteria trump science. Amazing that this legislation has been introduced in the first year of office – rather than just another working group.”

Misinformation: ‘other countries have safely embraced these technologies for the benefit of their people and their economies’

The Gene Technology Bill is the New Zealand version of an international push by commercial interests to free up genetic experimentation from any last fetters of regulation. The massive profits made during the pandemic under emergency deregulation and government mandated participation have set a new benchmark for industry greed. Our Bill is far ahead of the rest of the world in terms of permissiveness. In a world of corporate giants from the food and pharmaceutical sectors seeking to push the envelope, New Zealand’s proposed out-on-a-limb laissez faire stance is a welcome development and something they have actually had a hand in creating.

We have seldom seen a more brazen claim than the use of the word ‘safely’ after 30 million excess deaths have been attributed to the pandemic during the last five years. Whether they come from a gene altered pathogen or a genetic vaccine is largely irrelevant here. As to citing England as a country accepting Gene Technology, a few days ago we pointed to the growing tide of public protest in the UK about the first use of anti-methane medicine Bovaer for cows and the sale of their milk and butter in supermarkets.

In the EU, proposed gene technology legislation has stalled due to disquiet among member states and in any case includes the precautionary principle which says that new technology must be proved safe before use, something that our Gene Technology Bill rejects. Nor does it liberalise research on microbes or animals as our Bill does.

Misinformation: ‘safe enabling regulatory regime’ that mostly classifies gene editing as safe, but supposedly can identify and mitigate any level of risk

A key plank of the government’s contention is the idea that gene editing has become more exact and therefore the need for testing, regulation, labelling, etc is reduced and in many if not most cases eliminated. This is not based on any valid scientific principle. Accuracy does not equate with safety. Just because you can achieve something more accurately does not guarantee its safety. A sniper trains every day to hit the target, but this does not make assassination a safer prospect.

As a result of serious adverse effects, the prospects for gene therapy dimmed in the 90s and early 2000s, but in 2008 new supposedly more exact gene editing techniques using CRISPR/cas gene scissors were developed. Research efforts stepped up and PR went back into overdrive—gene technology and medicine, according to this new narrative, now being promoted by our government, was going to be safe and effective. Today we know this to be false, as a paper published in November 2022 by the Karolinska Institute shows. CRISPR/cas techniques lead to unpredictable on-target genetic rearrangement which can interfere with vital cellular gene repair mechanisms.

During the pandemic, the supposed action of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was outlined in great detail for the public and indeed, novel genetic instructions were ported into billions of an injected individual’s cells successfully by mRNA vaccines, but the outcome itself was not as predicted. The vaccines did not stop first infections, transmission or repeated infections. In theory the injected vaccine agents would be cleared up within days after having elicited the required protective immune memory. This didn’t happen.

For example a peer reviewed study conducted by the US CDC and published in the Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society on Dec 5th entitled “Protection From COVID-19 Vaccination and Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 6 Months–4 Years, United States, September 2022–April 2023” reports that COVID-19-vaccinated children had an increased incidence of COVID-19 infection compared to the unvaccinated.

More worrying: investigative journalist Alex Berenson formerly of the NY Times reports scientists at prestigious Yale University have announced the imminent publication of a study that has found concentrations of COVID-19 spike protein in the blood of individuals two years after mRNA vaccination, suggesting the genetic sequences in the vaccine may have integrated into the DNA of recipients to the detriment of their health.

These and many many other studies published during the last year in learned journals which we have reported reveal there are unexpected and unpredictable classes of serious risk to health with gene technology that can only be detected years after the event with careful research. Genetic material can reproduce and perpetuate itself in a way that chemicals cannot.

The misery of gene technology safety has been greatly simplified and altered for public consumption by corporations, scientists and politicians with vested interests. In reality the interior of the cell contains great complexity with trillions of elements involved. In this situation accuracy is not possible, always there are off target effects.

Moreover there are the ever present risks of lab accidents. A 2022 study of the Prevalence of Accident Occurrence Among Scientific Laboratory Workers found: “Among 220 participants recruited in the study, 99 participants (45.0%) have had accidents during their lab works. 59.6% have been exposed once, 32.3% between two and four times, only 1.0% between four and six times, and 7.1% more than six times.”

What sort of gene technology projects might be approved?

The Gene Technology Bill owes much of its content to Australian legislation so we decided to look over the ditch and see just how it all works or rather doesn’t work. The Australian Office of the Gene Technology Regulator has just issued an Invitation to comment on Clinical trials of controlled infection with seasonal influenza viruses (DIR 210). The project has been submitted for approval by the Doherty Institute, a subsidiary of the University of Melbourne. Its principal purpose is described as follows:

“The initial aim is to evaluate the safety and infectivity of recombinant seasonal human influenza viruses in healthy volunteers. These GM viruses will then be used to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drugs or vaccine candidates to prevent and control influenza infection.”

In other words the lab is to make gene altered versions of the flu and then test out various genetic drugs and/or vaccines on human volunteers over a five year period. It does sound eerily similar to what went on at Wuhan Virology Lab for the five years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, but then the Gene Regulator is there to put us right. They have already rated the project as posing ‘negligible to moderate risks to human health or safety’. In other words, whatever the public submits to the regulator, the project, which creates new viruses, is likely to be a shoo in for a rubber stamp. You might like to reflect that there is a big difference between the words ‘negligible’ and ‘moderate’. This points to the highly arbitrary and misleading risk classification process being used in Australia which is akin to pinning the tail on a donkey. You can dive into the details here.

The project at the Doherty Institute has at least reached the desk of the gene regulator. If you have enough money, it needn’t actually ever come near the regulator or his desk. An article in the UK Guardian on Dec 10 2024 is entitled “Moderna’s mRNA vaccines to be exempt from advisory committee scrutiny under $2bn Morrison-era deal“. It reports Australians will be offered respiratory mRNA vaccines from next year under a confidential $2bn onshore manufacturing deal struck with Moderna. The agreement exempts Moderna’s mRNA vaccines from assessment by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), a government memorandum has revealed. The contract signed with the American pharmaceutical company commits successive Australian governments to buying locally produced Moderna vaccines for at least a decade. They will be manufactured at a specially built plant at Melbourne’s Monash University. The memorandum which is raising alarmed red flags even among researchers says the Moderna vaccines “will not go through the PBAC process and therefore will not be listed as designated vaccines on the National Immunisation Program”.

Our Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology Judith Collins no doubt realises what is going on in Australia and approves. She has cited Australian legislation as the lead we are following. The Gene Technology Bill sets the stage for our newly appointed government regulator to dust off his rubber stamp in a similar fashion and expose us all to unquantifiable risk.

Protection from civil and criminal liability

Despite the bogus claims of safety, the Gene Technology Bill seems to anticipate that there might be a few problems so they have included Clause 187—Protection from civil and criminal liability to remove any responsibility as follows:

This protects most persons from civil and criminal liability for any act that the person does or omits to do in the performance of their functions or duties under this Bill. It applies to the following persons:

the Regulator
an employee or agent of the Regulator
an enforcement officer
a member of the Technical Advisory Committee or the Māori Advisory Committee
a member of any subcommittee of those committees.

The person is protected from civil and criminal liability, however it may arise, for any act that the person does or omits to do under a requirement of this Act or simply if they are believed to be acting in good faith in the course of their duties under the Act.

Short version: the government is washing its hands of any liability.

Just reflect for a moment that the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) in New Zealand is part of the everyday fabric of our lives. We rely upon it. The CGA guarantees that products must be:

Safe
Of acceptable quality
Fit for their intended purpose
Match the description given
Match the sample or demonstration model
In acceptable condition when received

If a product doesn’t meet these guarantees, consumers can claim a refund, repair, or replacement. The Gene Technology Bill completely bypasses these provisions. Of course those damaged by gene technology will not be able to be refunded or repaired, perhaps the government envisions they will be replaced as happened with vaccine mandates.

So will we know what we are eating or being subjected to?

The Gene Technology Bill includes clauses which repeal and replace all provisions of previous legislation relating to gene technology. A global search of the Bill reveals that the word ‘labelling’ appears zero times. Any previous legal requirement that the presence of genetically modified content be identified on food labels is thereby rescinded. We won’t know what we are eating. This bypasses the need for traceability in the food chain which has formed a protective envelope over public health for a hundred years. No more.

I am sure many of you, like all of us at the Hatchard Report, are becoming more alarmed at the content of the Gene Technology Bill, but our hope lies with the vast majority of Kiwis who care about their food choices. This Bill has been rushed into Parliament without any clear understanding of its clauses. A sober look at the Bill reveals its glaring flaws and misconceptions. Our hope is that clear simple facts will create public pressure and sink the bill. We have until midnight on February 17th to make ;submissions to the Health Select Committee. More importantly, discussing the implications with friends and lobbying MPs directly can create a stir.

This will require steady hands, clear heads and a willingness to discuss the issues with our peers. The key points needing emphasis in submissions and discussions are as follows:

Gene technology content in foods will no longer be identified in labels. We will not know what we are eating.
Without labelling and traceability through the food chain any adverse effects cannot be identified or assessed overturning the lessons of food safety learned during the last 100 years. People with allergies are especially at risk.
Gene technology is imprecise and subject to off target effects affecting health.
Gene tech manufacturing processes are plagued by rogue genetic contamination.
Genetically modified organisms can spread without limit and cannot be recalled or remediated as we found out during the pandemic.
Claims of safety and effectiveness are totally misleading, gene technology is known to produce both short and long term adverse off-target effects.
Genetic material is highly mobile, pathways for genetic recombination with human DNA are known to exist.
The Bill provides provision for the government to reimpose vaccine mandates whenever it decides to do so.
The Bill abandons the precautionary principle and allows for the implementation, release and consumption of experimental gene technology products before they are proven safe.
The Bill does not specify how the regulator will assess any risk. The pandemic shows how far off such assessments can be.
Claims of economic and health benefits from gene technology have been wildly exaggerated. Most projects fail. Projects will be mostly funded by the government and be a drain on the public purse. NZ’s economy will be better served by fostering our traditional strengths in farming. Overseas farmers have found patented gene technologies to be costly and no more productive than prior methods. Widespread implementation of gene technology in New Zealand is likely to face consumer backlashes and close our overseas markets.

In his comment, David Farrar believes that the existing HSNO legislation and the precautionary principle it enshrines have allowed ‘hysteria to trump science’. Nothing could be further from the truth, five COVID-19 pandemic years should have taught us the dangers of funding gene research while abandoning precaution.

Good luck with your submissions. This is winnable if we all stand together and speak out. People don’t just care about their food, they rely on it for health and well being.

More detailed information and extra scientific references are available in our articles here , here, here, here and here

RELATED

The Risks of Biotechnology Deregulation are Unquantifiable

Photo credit: hatchardreport.com

News

Season’s Greetings

December 21, 2024 Pam Vernon 6 Comments

Wishing all our readers everywhere a peaceful and blessed Christmas Season…!!

You may like this beautiful medley by TJ Taotua @ Youtube.

Image by Hans from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Yale Scientists: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Remain in Body for Years, Integrate into Human DNA

December 21, 2024 Pam Vernon 3 Comments

From slaynews.com via Exposing the Darkness @ Substack

By Frank Bergman December 20, 2024

A group of eminent scientists from the prestigious Yale University is sounding the alarm after a long-term study found that Covid mRNA “vaccines” remain in the bodies of recipients and continue to cause harm for years after the last injection.

Shockingly, the researchers found that the genetic material from the “vaccines” can integrate into human DNA.

The unpublished study is led by world-renowned Yale scientist Dr. Akiko Iwasaki.

The findings have sent shockwaves through the scientific community as they conflict with the “safe and effective” dogma that has been pushed by health officials, doctors, politicians, and the corporate media.

During their study, the researchers analyzed people who had received at least one shot of a Covid mRNA “vaccine” but had never been infected with COVID-19.

This was to rule out the possibility that the virus could have caused genetic material traces in the bloodstream.

As we’ve seen before with other vaccine side effects, such as myocarditis, the virus has often been blamed.

The researchers found that uninfected patients who had received an mRNA shot still had spike protein in their bloodstream years after their last injection.

Dr. Iwasaki found evidence of the spike protein still being present 700 days after the recipient received the last shot.

Several of the other recipients had received their last injection over 450 days prior and still had “vaccine” spike protein in their bodies.

In addition, the Yale researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators).

The drop in CD4 T cells indicates that “vaccinated” individuals are suffering long-term immunosuppression.

These findings reveal that genetic material from the Covid mRNA injections is integrating with human DNA.

According to Alex Berenson, the integration with human DNA explains the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream in vaccinated individuals.

The fact that the study was led by Dr. Iwasaki is also notable.

Iwasaki had previously advocated for the vaccine and dismissed safety concerns as “absurd.”

During the pandemic, she also publicly supported vaccine mandates.

However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue.

Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications.

The study from the highly respected team of scientists could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media.

According to Midwestern Doctor, Yale officials revealed that there is a “battle going on” to suppress the study and prevent it from being published.

“A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it,” the doctor revealed.

“We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community).

“In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).”

The Yale scientists are reportedly planning to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server.

Meanwhile, leading medical experts have been raising the alarm after a new study proved that vaccinated people can pass on the genetic material from the mRNA injections to people who have never received a shot.

As Slay News reported, the major new peer-reviewed study has confirmed that unvaccinated people can suffer from the harmful side effects of Covid mRNA “vaccines” by just being around people who have received the injections.

The study finally confirms the existence of “vaccine shedding” – an issue previously shot down by health officials as a “conspiracy theory.”

Alarmingly, the study found that unvaccinated people suffer vaccine harms even if they are “indirectly exposed” to those who received Covid mRNA shots.

A study titled, “Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals,” was just published in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.

The team of top American researchers behind the study was led by Professor Jill Newman and Dr. Sue E. Peters.

One of the authors of the study wrote:

“After more than a year of censorship from the medical journals, our landmark study and manuscript have been published demonstrating significant circumstantial evidence that something is being shed from the COVID-19 vaccinated population to the unvaccinated population.

“It is far beyond time for these toxic injections to be withdrawn from the market.”

Reacting to the study’s alarming findings, esteemed physician Dr. Pierre Kory wrote on X:

“The most puzzling thing we’ve seen with the vaccine is its ability to ‘shed’ and harm those who never got it.

“A peer-reviewed study just validated the thousands of shedding reports sent to us.”

Dr. Kory also detailed the “vaccine shedding” phenomenon during an interview on American Thought Leaders.

WATCH: https://rumble.com/v5xyzot-top-doctor-raises-alarm-over-study-proving-vaccine-shedding-is-real.html

SOURCE

Photo credit: thanks to pixabay.com

censorship, News

Who are these Fake Fact-Checkers? Names from the University of Canberra’s News & Media Centre

December 21, 2024 Pam Vernon 2 Comments

From Ursula Edgington, PhD

A Case-Study from Australia in how the public is manipulated by ‘trusted news sources’

My Substack colleague

Michael Ginsburg brought a new Oz publication to my attention that was reported in The Conversation with an intriguing claim:

“97% of Australians have limited skills to verify information online”

The author of this nauseating piece of propaganda, is Joel Abrams. He also wrote this patronising piece of bs called “A recipe for trustworthy journalism” which included this not-to -be-missed video (1m 40 secs) where a woman in a kitchen tries to promote the metaphor of cooking-up a ‘news’ article by dumbing-down its ingredients…

READ AT THE LINK

The Lawyers’ Regulator Enabler

Share this:

New Zealand’s Stealthy Pivot to Police State Status — Part 2

This dispatch was originally published 4 September, 2021 on Snoopman News.

Share this:

Share this:

Re-Cap on ‘No Jab, No Job’

“It’s for the Greater Good”

Gold Dust Exemptions

So what?

Share this:

Share this:

There is a revolution in progress, and it is not a bloodless revolution.

These clauses bypass the medical choice provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights.

Something absolutely fundamental and personal is being taken away from us

Share this:

This dispatch was originally published 5 May, 2022 on Snoopman News.

Share this:

This dispatch was originally published 26 October, 2021 on Snoopman News.

Share this:

Share this:

Subscribe to Dean Henderson

Share this:

Share this:

This film is a warning to the world.

Disclaimer

Key points

CBDC is about total control

Who is driving this effort?

Click here to watch the film

Prosperity and freedom or oppression and slavery?

What man does not fix, man gets to keep

Share this:

The Biden administration and Tom “Mr. Monsanto” Vilsack have emerged victorious in their effort to use the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to force Mexico to accept U.S. grown genetically engineered corn.

Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum Responds to the Ruling

The Mexican Government’s Arguments for Banning GM Corn

Biden and Mr. Monsanto Win… For Now

The Mexican Government Continues to Oppose GM Crops

Share this:

Critical From The Beginning

“Peverse”Monetary Incentives

No Vaccine Exemption

Chance Of Fine Or Jail

Posthumous PCR Positive

Leaders Do Not Care About Peoples Health

Globalists Have Seized Control Of New Zealand

Sums Of Hush Money

History Repeating Itself

Hope For New Zealand

Seeking Connection

Read more of RAIR’s coverage on coronavirus vaccines at the link

Share this:

Why we can’t ‘move on’.

Other discriminating organisations

Solutions!

Share this:

Parents Appeal to US Supreme Court after Vermont Courts Ruled Schools Can Vaccinate Kids Against Parents’ Wishes

Other State Rulings

Share this:

Related articles

Share this:

Share this:

Story at-a-glance

Fake Meat Is All About Controlling the Food Supply

Fake Meat Is Even Worse Than CAFOs

Save This Article for Later – Get the PDF Now

Regenerative Farming Beats Fake Foods

What Is Fake Meat?

Impossible Foods’ Fake Meat Is Loaded with Glyphosate, LA

‘Precision Fermentation’ Isn’t Natural Either

Where Should You Get Your Meat?

Share this:

Brief Background to the NZ ‘No Jab, No Job’ Mandates:

Share this:

“Chocolate City” speech

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

ATLAS – how a right-wing global network is building influence in Aotearoa