Tag Archives: Pregnancy

Medical Industry

ULTRASOUND: A century of forgotten research shows clear damage to fetal tissues

Leave a comment

Analysis by A Midwestern Doctor
Via Dr Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • The medical field has historically exposed mothers to harmful treatments for infants. After efforts to stop routine fetal X-rays, prenatal ultrasound (US) was introduced as a “safe” alternative
  • While ultrasound is considered safe, a century of forgotten research shows it can harm tissues
  • Evidence shows early fetuses are especially vulnerable to ultrasound, with trials in China that gave ultrasound before abortions revealing clear damage to fetal tissues
  • US harms are dose-dependent. In 1992, despite safety concerns, the FDA raised permissible US levels 8-fold, which may have contributed to the rise of chronic childhood illnesses
  • The benefits of prenatal US are often exaggerated, leading to unnecessary treatments that harm both mothers and infants

The earlier in life an input enters a human being’s system, the more of a profound impact it has. For example, abuse, neglect, or trauma early in childhood often pattern individuals for their entire lives (and in many cases their descendants as well).1

Similarly, it’s well recognized that toxin exposure during pregnancy (especially in the first two months of life2) can create lifelong issues. Sadly, this principle is frequently neglected when convenient (e.g., by pushing the COVID-19 vaccine on pregnant mothers).

Video Link

‘Safe and Effective’

One of the core beliefs medical students are taught from the very start is that vaccines are “safe and effective.” As such, they become unable to see the obvious dangers of vaccines (e.g., the century of evidence linking vaccines to “unexplained” sudden infant deaths — which coincidentally occur at the same time the early childhood vaccines are given).

A similar situation with ultrasound exists, as all doctors are taught that, unlike other imaging modalities, ultrasound is completely harmless. Rather, ultrasound’s only downside is that the image quality is operator dependent — even though many medical devices use high-powered ultrasound to destroy human tissues.

In truth, like vaccines, initially the medical profession was quite skeptical of ultrasound (as there was a great deal of evidence suggesting harm). However, as the decades passed and its ever increasing use was normalized, those concerns were forgotten entirely. For example, in 1983, CNN aired a program on the dangers of ultrasound (where the FDA acknowledged these dangers) almost no one knows about.

Video Link

The Medicalization of Childbirth

 

Initially, doctors had no interest in childbirth. However, this changed in 1820 after a prestigious Harvard Doctor pointed out it could create lifelong customers due to the mother’s gratitude towards their doctor for helping her at her most vulnerable time.3

In turn, a variety of ploys were used to turn what had been a natural process into a medical intervention requiring a costly array of (often harmful) medical interventions.

Note: Despite those interventions making America by far the most expensive place to give birth to a child4 (besides Japan), 0.56% of American infants do not survive childbirth5 (the highest death rate amongst the affluent nations6) and the US ranks 65th in its maternal death rate.7 This indicates America’s approach to birth may be misguided.

After the idea of X-raying a fetus throughout pregnancy was proposed in 1923, it was quickly taken up by the medical profession.8 Before long, evidence accumulated that this was very dangerous, but it was not until 1975 that the obstetric field shifted away from it — a shift that largely occurred because an alternative way was found to conduct those routine exams.

Fortunately, at the time, many doctors, including one of the leading reformers of the era, Robert S. Mendelsohn, were aware of the dozens of studies showing ultrasound was not safe and recognized the same mistake was being repeated:

Video Link

Note: The developing fetus is very sensitive to external energy inputs (e.g., studies have linked prenatal EMF exposure to obesity, neurological impairment and autism).

 

Save This Article for Later – Get the PDF Now

Download PDF
 

‘Safe’ Levels of Ultrasound

Almost all of the ultrasound research showed its toxicity was dose-dependent. By the late 1970s, leading ultrasound researchers were explicitly warning against giving US to fetuses and that it was imperative to be very cautious of the dose.

Note: Much of this was based on the recognition that ultrasound could heat tissues (especially those close to dense bones like the brain) to levels known to be harmful to fetuses. This heating (along with the cavitation bubbles and mechanical stress ultrasound causes) is thought to be the primary mechanism of harm, although other explanations have also been proposed (e.g., ultrasound permanently muting many of the core frequencies of the body9).

Unfortunately, as the technology evolved, higher doses were needed to get the higher quality images customers wanted, so in 1992, the FDA made the controversial decision to raise the permitted ultrasound limits massively.

fda maximum allowed machine intensity per year

This limit (720 mW/cm2), however this vastly exceeded the standard accepted ultrasound dose10 which had already been demonstrated to damage tissues (and sadly, due to poor FDA oversight, many machines often use far higher intensities).

seconds to bioeffects

At the time, the change was justified by better training in ultrasound operators being a viable way to prevent fetal damage, but unfortunately, this never happened. Rather, ultrasound became declared “safe and effective,” the existing research was forgotten, funding for future safety research was blocked, medical guidelines gradually eliminated their cautions on ultrasound, and ultrasound operators lost almost any awareness they needed to be concerned about fetal safety.

Most importantly, this 1992 change coincided with the explosion of chronic illnesses that emerged in our children.11

autism vs machine intensity

While the proliferation of vaccines is the most likely explanation for this epidemic, one study found12 ultrasound increased the risk of autism in genetically susceptible children, suggesting ultrasound may have served a contributing role (which may relate13 to its ability to potentiate the cytotoxicity of antibiotics and other pharmaceutical drugs).

Likewise, many others found14 prenatal ultrasound significantly reduced fetal growth, impaired neuronal migration, and in children, increased:

Dyslexia

Delayed speech

Left-handedness

Schizophrenia

Poor academic and physical education performance

Passivity and tiredness

Note: We also periodically come across cases of parents who used home ultrasound throughout their pregnancy to observe their developing child (e.g., Tom Cruise attracted national controversy for this15) and noticed that their babies tended to be smaller and more sickly.

Fetal Reactivity

One of the first things that made me suspicious of ultrasound was noticing that once ultrasound was applied, fetuses would react to it, and often seem as though they were trying to get away from it as the probe was directed towards them — which suggested, contrary to what we were told, ultrasound was not inert. After some digging, I discovered:

  • Most midwives (and a few physicians) I’d spoken to had made similar observations and also hence questioned its safety.
  • Scientific research showed that ultrasound caused increased fetal movement.16
  • A hydrophone inside the uterus17 determined that ultrasound registers at 100 to 12018 decibels there (which is equivalent to a subway entering a train station19) — whereas OSHA limits workplace ultrasound exposure to between 105 to 115 decibels.20

Fetal Demise

Another pivotal moment came when I saw a despondent mother in the emergency room having a miscarriage who kept saying, “I don’t understand what happened. We saw our gynecologist earlier today, she looked at my baby, and said he was in great health.” As I looked into this, I began to find many similar reports like this one (which includes many other instances she came across):

Video Link

Likewise, numerous large studies have shown ultrasound can cause miscarriages or premature labor,21,22,23,24 and since I began this series, many readers have shared similar tragic experiences.

Evidence of Harm

Over the last century, hundreds of studies have demonstrated the dangers of ultrasound, over 200 of which I summarized here. Collectively they all show dose-dependent biological damage occurs (at levels that were frequently less than 1% of the FDA’s 720 mW/cm2 limit). In cell studies, ultrasound has been repeatedly observed to:

Cause genetic damage similar to that induced by X-rays

Make susceptible cells become cancerous

Damage cellular structures (e.g., microtubules, mitochondria, the nucleus, and the endoplasmic reticulum)

Create damaging free radicals

Create abnormal cell motility

Initiate cell death

In animal studies, ultrasound has been shown to:

Cause the same damage observed in those cellular studies

Significantly impair mice and monkey behaviors (e.g., learning, memory, activity, and sociability)

Impair cardiac function

Inhibit embryonic growth or kill developing embryos

Damage nerves and create motor paralysis

Decrease white blood cell counts

Cause hemorrhages in the lungs and bones

Create a wide range of congenital malformations (e.g., in the heart, head, and spine)

Note: Many of these defects, particularly those of the heart increased in tandem with the widespread adoption of ultrasound.

congenital heart defects by year

For ethical reasons, similar studies cannot be conducted in humans. However, in the early 1980s, dozens of studies (e.g., I summarized 41 of them here) were conducted in China on pregnant women immediately prior to abortion, with half of them receiving abortions and the fetuses then being dissected (some of which can be found in PubMed). Collectively, they observed similar damage in each organ that was examined and that ultrasound caused:

The cell death process to initiate — something many Chinese investigators found extremely concerning given that small changes in the initial embryonic cells can be immensely consequential for the rest of life

An increase of the proteins associated with cell death

Mutagenic changes and cancerous transformations

DNA damage

Increased levels of malondialdehyde (a highly reactive molecule), TNF-α, and lipid peroxidation (a sign of oxidative damage)

Decreased activity of many antioxidant enzymes and nitric oxide

Cellular damage (e.g., swelling, degeneration, disintegration, disorganization, karyolysis, and necrosis)

Damage to many cellular structures (e.g., pyknosis, rarefaction, vacuolization, disintegration), particularly within the mitochondria

Depleted glycogen levels

Additionally, they found specific damage to the placenta, pituitary gland, eyes, immune system, kidneys, liver, ovaries, testicles (and sperm), and the brain’s neurons and glial cells.

Note: Ultrasound has been extensively explored as a male birth control method25 and has been found to induce premature ovulation.26 Additionally, a large 2012 study found that 1.25% of children who had an ultrasound as a fetus had urologic disorders (e.g., a urinary obstruction), whereas in those who did not get a prenatal ultrasound, only 0.66% did.27

A few large randomized control trials (RCTs) published in premier medical journals have also demonstrated dangers with ultrasound:

• A 1990 RCT28 gave 4691 women ultrasound. They experienced 20 miscarriages and 11 elective abortions (due to diagnosed birth defects), whereas zero of either occurred in the control group. Additionally, it was determined that of the 250 placenta previas diagnosed by ultrasound (a key reason for prenatal ultrasounds), only 4 were present at birth.

Note: Placenta previa typically resolves later in the pregnancy.

• A 1990 RCT compared 57 patients being surveilled for preterm labor who received weekly pelvic exams or cervical ultrasound. Premature labor occurred in 52% of those receiving US, and 25% of those receiving pelvic exams. Those receiving US were more likely to receive tocolytic (labor inducing) agents (55% vs. 21%) and did not see any benefits from ultrasound.29

• A 1992 RCT published gave regular Doppler examinations (a stronger form of ultrasound) to 1,246 women.30 Compared to controls, the perinatal death rate increased 2.4 times, the total pregnancy loss by 1.67 times, the emergency C-section rate by 17%, and the need for resuscitations at birth by 6% (along with a significant decrease in Apgar scores).

• A 1993 RCT gave 1,415 women regular Doppler examinations. Compared to those who only received standard ultrasound, they were 35% more likely to have an intrauterine growth restriction and 65% more likely to have a low birth weight.31

Sadly, rather than changing the standard of care, each of these were ignored.

Is Ultrasound Effective?

Numerous studies show ultrasound provides minimal overall benefit, especially if used early in pregnancy when the fetus is most vulnerable to its damaging effect. For example:

• A 2010 Cochrane review (the gold standard for evaluating medical evidence) of 11 trials comprising 37,505 women found early pregnancy ultrasound provided minimal benefit (there were no reductions in adverse outcomes for babies or in health service use by mothers and babies).32

• A 2005 RCT of 4,187 pregnant women found that umbilical Doppler monitoring led to a significant increase in the number of ultrasonographic and Doppler examinations but had no effects on the outcome of the pregnancy.33

• A 1993 meta-analysis found no improvement in birth outcomes or perinatal mortality from ultrasound, but noted it incorrectly diagnosed fetal malformations.34

• A 1993 RCT35 of 15,151 low-risk pregnancies found that routine ultrasound provided no benefit.

Note: Another use of ultrasound is to monitor a fetus’s heart rate continually through the labor process. Unfortunately, there is no evidence this practice improves neonatal outcomes. Rather it just increases the rate of C-sections (e.g., in 1970 when it began, 5.5% of deliveries were C-sections,36 while in 2023, 32.3% of them were37).

This lack of efficacy is largely because the primary “benefit” of ultrasound is that it can inform the parents if the baby has a severe defect and hence should be aborted. This is problematic as:

• Many parents would not agree to prenatal ultrasounds if they knew it would force them to make that choice.

• Ultrasounds frequently have ambiguous results which then require extensive evaluations throughout the pregnancy (or invasive tests like amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling which carry many severe risks including birth defects, a 0.5% to 1% chance of causing miscarriages,38 and decreasing the likelihood of a successful pregnancy by 4.6%39).

Most frequently, that ambiguity creates significant anxiety, depression, and hostility for the mother40 (which is not good for the infant).

• Parents who abort “defective” children are wracked with guilt over the choice for years, whereas they quickly find peace with miscarriages (a common outcome for non-viable pregnancies) and stillbirths.

• Studies have shown a significant number of “defects” were erroneous diagnoses, and many well-publicized stories exist of completely healthy babies being born whose parents had been repeatedly pressured to abort them (likewise this happened to a few friends of mine).

Many of the other benefits of ultrasound are either unnecessary (e.g., getting a picture of their face), possible to determine with other methods (e.g., their age, if there are twins, or if they have a genetic defect), or possible to determine around the time of labor (e.g., if a C-section is necessary).

Rather, the primary benefit is to inform you if the baby has a high-risk condition that requires intrauterine surgery (which applies to roughly 1 in 2000 pregnancies)41 or requires specialized surgical care immediately following childbirth (which can typically be determined with a physical examination).

Note: A 1997 study of 36 children with congenital defects only detected 19% to 36% of them. In those whose defects were detected (and the management of their labor was thus altered), 77% survived, whereas for those whose defects were missed, 96% survived (and had better Apgar scores and birth weights and spent less time on the ventilator). Additionally, while it took 3 times as long for those who needed surgeries to get one, no difference in mortality resulted.42

As such, I believe rather than being routine, prenatal ultrasounds should only be done when there is a specific medical necessity for them (e.g., in high-risk pregnancies where the results of the scan would change its management following unexplained bleeding or to clarify uncertainties during labor), and that when done, care should be taken to minimize fetal ultrasound exposure.

Conclusion

For medical specialties to be financially viable, they need to routinely perform profitable procedures on the patients they see (which are often referred to as the specialty’s “bread and butter” and are funded as a result of aggressive lobbying by the American Medical Association).43

Unfortunately, many of these procedures provide minimal value to the patients and, in many cases, are actually harmful (e.g., pediatricians depend upon vaccine sales to keep their practices afloat). Sadder still, in many cases, the doctors don’t even understand the evidence for or against the practice (e.g., I’ve found this is the case for pediatricians who routinely perform circumcisions).

In my eyes, one of the greatest upsides to the tragedy of COVID-19 is that it’s made it possible to expose the abhorrent tactics the medical industry has used for decades to exploit us for profit. As such, the public is beginning to question many of the longstanding medical practices they’ve reflexively trusted, and similarly, leaders like RFK Jr. have begun proposing removing the AMA’s ability to set the exorbitant reimbursement rates for medical procedures.44

As children are both the most vulnerable to medical injury and cannot speak out for themselves when these injuries occur (although as any judicious observer can tell you — they do try to tell us), it is my sincere hope the new era we are walking into will at last allow us to protect them from these predatory medical practices. Our children are our future and it is vital that we protect them.

Author’s note: This is an abridged version of a longer article that goes into much greater detail on the data mention here, safe alternatives to ultrasound, effective strategies we’ve found for preventing miscarriages and having a happy, healthy and alert child, and methods to prevent common complications of pregnancy (e.g., back pain, preeclampsia, edema). That article and its additional references can be read here.

A Note from Dr. Mercola About the Author

A Midwestern Doctor (AMD) is a board-certified physician from the Midwest and a longtime reader of Mercola.com. I appreciate AMD’s exceptional insight on a wide range of topics and am grateful to share it. I also respect AMD’s desire to remain anonymous since AMD is still on the front lines treating patients. To find more of AMD’s work, be sure to check out The Forgotten Side of Medicine on Substack or follow AMD on Twitter (𝕏).

Herbicides, News

New Large Scale Biomonitoring Results Show Increasing Herbicide Exposure in Pregnant Women

1 Comment

From Sustainable Pulse

The average level of dicamba herbicide in the urine of pregnant women has increased more than 3-fold since 2017, the year widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant GMO crops began, Heartland Health Research Alliance (HHRA) reported on Tuesday.

Dicamba levels in urine have risen dramatically compared to levels of 2,4-D.  In 2010-2014, the average level of 2,4-D in urine (0.4 ug/L) was twice the average level of dicamba (0.2 ug/L). But by 2020-2022, the average level of dicamba (0.68 ug/L) exceeded the 2,4-D average (0.575 ug/L) by 18%, despite a 45% increase in the average level of 2,4-D in urine in 2020-2022 since 2010-2014.

Both herbicides are classified as “possible” carcinogens and are known to increase the risk of reproductive problems and adverse birth outcomes.

The percent of urine samples with detectable levels of dicamba rose 50% from 2010-2014 to 2020-2022 as a result of the widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant crops.

Of the 16 pesticide analytes that HHRA testing is able to detect, 5 were in found in 99%-100% of the samples, including 2,4-D. Since 2010, most people in the Midwest have been exposed to 7 or more of these 16 pesticide analytes on a near-daily basis.

The above new evidence of rising herbicide exposures was presented on Tuesday at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association in Boston. The “Assessing Herbicide Impacts on Reproduction, Birth Outcomes & Children’s Development” session highlighted evidence pointing to rising risk of herbicide-driven adverse birth outcomes.

HHRA now has glyphosate and glufosinate results from the analytical lab they are working with, the Centre de Toxicologie du Québec (CTQ) in Canada for around 700 hundred samples spanning 2010 through mid-2022. HHRA also has data from CTQ for another 13 pesticide analytes from about 150 samples collected from 2010 through spring 2022. These results include the levels of 2,4-D and dicamba in the urine of pregnant women.

HHRA’s new biomonitoring data point to four preliminary findings.

  1. The average level of dicamba in the urine of pregnant women has increased 3.4-fold just since widespread planting of dicamba-tolerant seeds began in 2017.
  2. Recent increases in farmer reliance on glufosinate (Liberty-brand herbicide) is now leading to possibly significant exposures to glufosinate and its primary metabolite 3-MPPA (3-MethylPhosphonicoPropionic Acid).
  3. Some good news — the levels of 8 out of 10 synthetic pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticide analytes have fallen over the last decade or so, including about a 50% decline in the primary metabolite of the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos.
  4. Based on HHRA’s data spanning 17 pesticide analytes, the average person in the Midwest over the last two decades has been exposed on most days to at least 7 pesticide analytes.

HHRA is highlighting the new data on dicamba and glufosinate because, these are the first, significant datasets collected worldwide on levels of these herbicides in human urine. Such data are essential for regulators, farmers, and the pesticide industry to accurately quantify pesticide risks and when determining whether steps are warranted to reduce exposures.

SOURCE

New Large Scale Biomonitoring Results Show Increasing Herbicide Exposure in Pregnant Women

Photo: Sustainable Pulse

Corona virus, Covid-19 experimental injection, News

US OBGYN challenges NZ Doctor’s recommending of the CV VX during pregnancy

1 Comment

Two important interviews with Dr James Thorpe … EWR

READ / LISTEN AT THE LINK

RELATED:

What is happening with babies and mothers?

Photo: pixabay.com

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

CV truths for busy people

1 Comment

From garymoller.com
Updated: Oct 19

We all have friends and family who still believe their Government is benevolent, who think their response to the pandemic has been marvellous, and the mRNA jab is safe and effective. But, of course, the opposite is the reality: Our Government has declared war on its people. They are working for insane foreigner technocrats, who intend to turn us into a totalitarian state, the vaccine is neither safe nor effective, and they are doing everything they can to hide the extent and gravity of their crimes.

Despite the obvious, in-your-face lying about these crimes, for most people, including myself, comprehending the reality and gravity of the situation is far from easy. But unfortunately, continuing to believe monumental lies is the easier path to follow for many people. They may argue that they are too busy, that they already have too much on their plates to deal with. We are told by the Government and their advisers, like the Pink Lady, who is our expert about everything, that they know better than you or anyone else about what is going on, and to such as extent that they’ll fire and publicly ridicule anyone who questions their truths.

https://www.garymoller.com/post/why-are-doctors-and-other-health-professionals-so-silent

One response is to ask them to do just one thing for you and set aside a little time to plug in their headphones and listen to two podcast-style presentations. After that, you can then have a civil discussion about the issues and agree or disagree but continue to be good friends no matter the outcome.

There are many possible presentations to recommend for the busy person, but here are two which should do the job:

(Unlike other broadcasters like Michael Laws and Sean Plunket, Leighton Smith is renowned for meticulously researching his podcast topics and not talking over his guests.)

Leighton Smith Podcast: Statistician and author Guy Hatchard discusses the distortion of public information, and the age of social engineeringLeighton Smith Podcast: Statistician and author Guy Hatchard discuss the distortion of public information and the age of social engineering

https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/podcasts/the-leighton-smith-podcast/leighton-smith-podcast-episode-176-october-12th-2022/

I’ll add here that Guy Hatchard and I go back a long time: We were part of a small group of health professionals who have, on two occasions, prevented the passing of the Natural Health Products Bill, which essentially hijacks natural health products, including ones like also vera, vitamin C and zinc to further the aims of Big Pharma and Medical-Industrial Complex. It just happens that the Minister of Health is about to railroad this legislation through the House this year without adequate consultation. If this legislation passes, practitioners like men may become a thing of the past.

”Dr Nikki Turner, you are murdering people! … Now debate me.” – Dr James Thorp MD: This interview, hosted by a couple of Kiwi broadcasters, Kelvyn Alp and Hannah Spierer, now streaming from a USA-based platform, is a beauty. In this interview, an international medical heavyweight calls out New Zealand’s lightweight medical expert for a head-to-head debate.

WATCH AT THIS LINK

As an aside, Alp and Spierers’ broadcasting platform was shut down in New Zealand a few months ago, hence the USA presence now. They are currently on bail defending themselves from prosecution by the NZ Government for holding or sharing objectionable information and face what could be years behind bars. if they lose!

SOURCE:

https://www.garymoller.com/post/covid-truths-for-busy-people

News

Other news

Leave a comment

Flavonoids in strawberries may hold the key to slowing aging and preventing degenerative disease

Latest posts on the CV

Pregnancy WARNING: Cell phone radiation harms unborn fetus and reduces fertility, new study reveals

The remarkable effects of vitamin C over the past 70 years

News

WHAT DOES THE NEW ZEALAND MEDSAFE DATA SHEET SAY ABOUT THE USE OF THE CV V IN PREGNANT WOMEN?

Leave a comment

From the Health Forum NZ @ Facebook

Pregnancy

There is limited experience with use of COMIRNATY in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/fetal development, parturition or post-natal development (see Fertility). Administration of COMIRNATY in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and fetus. https://medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/datasheet/c/comirnatyinj.pdf

Photo: pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

VAERS: vaccine reporting system has recorded more than 500 spontaneous abortions after experimental COVID-19 “vaccines”

2 Comments

Note: Pregnancy related adverse reactions are on the FDA’s long list of possible side effects not noted in the NZ data at all. There are 32 of these about which you are not being told. See info below & look for yourself. NZ tells you there are the usual benign sore arm, high temperature and so on, just a few. EWR

ATLANTA — Mainstream media smugly and without shame dismiss all facts, science and observations about the experimental COVID-19 injections as “conspiracy theory.” CNN, which has more commercial time for pharmaceutical products than all the other networks, is notorious for this.

We’ve all seen the thousands of videos of vaxxed people sticking metal objects on the site of the shot. All of them feel the magnetic pull. But CNN, of course, wants you to dismiss what you see with your own eyes, and simply believe what you’re told by them.

Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former Chief Scientific Officer and Vice President of Pfizer. He warned everyone in December that these experimental mRNA shots will lead to mass infertility. Women will no longer be able to form placentas and thus, cannot carry babies. We’ve also seen frightening menstrual cycles from non-vaxxed women who were in close proximity of vaxxed people.

Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a British pathologist, found that the spike proteins in the experimental mRNA shots effectively sterilize men. He stated the obvious, in that the 2-3 months of so-called clinical trials were not nearly enough to know the long-term effects of these shots. Of course mainstream media “fact-checkers” say they have “debunked” Dr. Hodkinson.

READ AT THE LINK;
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/06/21/vaers-vaccine-reporting-system-has-recorded-more-than-500-spontaneous-abortions-after-experimental-covid-19-vaccines/?utm_source=June+21+email

NOTE: If you are considering the covid-19 jab consider the following info not provided by the NZ govt:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION

This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis,

Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy,

Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes,

Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,

Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain,

Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

Hong Kong: 12 DEAD Four Miscarriages in One Week Following COVID-19 Injections

Leave a comment

From healthimpactnews.com

Shortly after publishing this last night, The Standard has apparently taken the article down.

Archive.org still has a copy here.

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The Standard, Hong Kong’s biggest circulation English daily newspaper, is reporting that 12 people have died, and 4 women have had miscarriages following COVID-19 shots just in the past week.

For the past week between May 24 and 30, 12 more people died at public hospitals after receiving the Covid vaccines, along with four women who suffered from miscarriages, according to the Hospital Authority.

The Hospital Authority said six of the 12 cases were hospitalized patients while the rest passed away in the emergency department.

With the additional miscarriage cases, Hong Kong has now seen 23 miscarriage cases after vaccination.

From February 26, when the city’s vaccination campaign started, until last Sunday, the city recorded 80 deaths following vaccinations.

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/hong-kong-12-dead-four-miscarriages-in-one-week-following-covid-19-injections/

Photo Credit: healthimpactnews.com

Corona virus, NZ

Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV VX – meanwhile the MoH website offers no guarantee of safety

4 Comments

“We don’t have enough information” regarding pregnancy and the shot. Why is this not being emphasized? Note also this from a post featuring cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough: “Something I want the reader to think about: Dr. McCullough said that during clinical trials for the “vaccines” pregnant women were not allowed to participate. But now ALL pregnant women are told to get the jab!! And don’t forget, these jabs are not FDA approved. They say it’s an emergency and that’s why they are allowing them without full approval!” SOURCE

(EWR)
________________________________________________________________________

From Lynda Wharton, The Health Forum NZ @ fb

PREGNANT WOMEN AND THE CV VX …
WE JUST DONT KNOW
Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV V.
They are informed by the Government to “speak with your doctor”….
And at the same time, there are numerous platforms assuring us of the “likely safety” of the CV V during pregnancy.
Please forward this photograph to all of your pregnant friends.
It is a screen shot of the actual information on the MOH website…
The truth in plain print right before our eyes:


READ THE INFO AT THE SOURCE

https://www.health.govt.nz/…/covid-19-vaccine-clinical…

____________________________________________________________________

EWR … FYI:

Here is a draft list of possible side effects compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US :

Guillain-Barre syndrome

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Transverse myelitis

Encephalitis

Myelitis

Encephalomyelitis

Meningoencephalitis

Meningitis

Encephalopathy

Convulsions

Seizures

Stroke

Narcolepsy

Cataplexy

Anaphylaxis

Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)

Myocarditis

Pericarditis

Autoimmune disease

Death

Pregnancy, Birth outcomes

Other acute demyelinating diseases

Non anaphylactic allergy reactions

Thromocytopenia

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Venous thromboembolism

Arthritis

Arthralgia

Joint pain

Kawasaki disease

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Vaccine enhanced disease

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.

SOURCE (go to p 17):

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

Photo credit: pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, News

A study in which 107 women in first trimester received The Shot, and 96 had miscarriages

1 Comment

WATCH AT THE LINK: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6V7embPgClBI/
ALSO see at the end, below in this article, social media feedback on these adverse reactions for the pregnant.

via markcrispinmiller.com

Here is the original article from the New England Journal of Medicine:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983

TheTruthHunter (Video channel info below)

COVID19:
The UK Government downgraded the danger of Covid19 from a high consequence infectious disease on 19th March 2020 (1 week BEFORE the first lockdown) – https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid

Global Covid Report – A Brilliant 73 page flip book style article – http://online.anyflip.com/inblw/ufbs/mobile/index.html?s=08

A 113 page pdf full of information from frontline workers & the VAERS – https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view

18 Reasons I won’t be getting a Covid19 ‘vaccine’ – https://www.deconstructingconventional.com/post/18-reason-i-won-t-be-getting-a-covid-vaccine

Covid19 is a manufactured pandemic – https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781

Doctor demolishes Covid vaccine – https://davidicke.com/2021/01/12/doctor-demolishes-gates-covid-vaccine-in-devastating-analysis/

If there is no virus why are people dying (article) – https://davidicke.com/2021/01/31/covid-if-there-is-no-virus-why-are-people-dying/

5 Questions to ask people who plan on getting a Covid19 ‘vaccine’ – https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/15/5-questions-to-ask-your-friends-who-plan-to-get-the-covid-vaccine/

Dr Andrew Kaufman – Sars Cov 2 has not been isolated. It doesn’t exist (article) – https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

A brilliant article explaining why the number of cycles (CT) of the PCR Test is pushing out false positives everywhere – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b2c12bbb-ac81-4cb4-9987-6f4bd15c26f0

MP’s & SAGE are heavily invested in the vaccine industry – https://naturallyhealthynews.info/investigation-mps-and-sage-heavily-invested-in-vaccine-industry/?smclient=9e1e643a-d9ec-41cf-a803-a15f88e07abe&utm_source=salesmanago&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=default

Face masks are neither effective or safe (article) – https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

Bill Gates: Vaccines are phenomenal profit makers – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/gates-vaccines-phenomenal-profit-makers/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a7546458-0f14-44d8-8e60-226218335bd8

A POSTSCRIPT ADDITION – Located these in a fb thread reporting adverse reactions:

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction

Unvaccinated women report miscarriages after interactions with vaccinated people

Leave a comment

via markcrispinmiller.com

https://montanadailygazette.com/2021/04/16/unvaccinated-women-report-miscarriages-after-interactions-with-vaccinated-people/

SEE ALSO:

MASSIVE BLEEDING IN WOMEN – ERECTILE PROBLEMS IN MEN. WHAT IS THE INJECTION DOING TO HUMANITY?

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

Pregnancy and the mRNA shot – Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer of Pfizer filed a petition in early Dec 2020 about the risks

Leave a comment

This post concerns a still birth, and comes from the https://thecovidblog.com

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FLORIDA — We want to preface this article with the fact that we only publish these stories to bring awareness to the situation surrounding COVID-19 experimental shots. These stories are not meant to disrespect families or individuals. But social media posts are public, primary sources for journalists. The social media “vaccine photo phenomenon” is a trend in 2021. We have the responsibility to report. Now on to the story…

Mary Voll: pediatric nurse has stillborn baby eight days after mRNA shot

Image by Christian Abella from Pixabay

abortion, NZ Government

Adern’s ‘loosening’ of abortion laws while NZ was in lockdown described as the ‘understatement of the decade’ – laws the majority of NZers were NOT in support of

Leave a comment

“According to the New York Times article, “public opinion surveys show that most New Zealanders” favored liberalizing their country’s abortion laws. However, independent polling shows that the vast majority oppose specific features in this law. For instance, just 2% of Kiwi women support abortion on-demand up to birth. 93% oppose sex-selective abortion, in which a child is killed for no other reason than his or her sex. And, 94% of women polled support longstanding legal standards for New Zealand’s abortion providers. In other words, they didn’t want them relaxed at all.”

bmw635 csi 6.42K subscribers You’d think that a global pandemic that’s killed hundreds of thousands would at least temper the advance of legal killing. It hasn’t. While headlines worldwide were praising New Zealand’s prime minister for her handling of COVID-19, she was working to pass what might be described as the most extreme abortion laws on the planet. LINK ==== https://www.familyfirst.org.nz/2020/0…https://nzcatholic.org.nz/2020/03/23/… In late March, New Zealand’s parliament voted, in the words of the New York Times, to “loosen” the nation’s abortion laws, particularly in the latter half of pregnancy when babies become viable outside of the womb. “Loosen” may be the understatement of the decade. New Zealand’s “loosened” laws now allows abortion on-demand, up to the moment of birth, for essentially any reason. That means sex-selective and disability-selective abortions, including for conditions like cleft lip and Down syndrome. The “loosening” happened despite the protests of over 1,200 New Zealanders with Down syndrome and their families, who called on Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to keep her campaign promise not to allow this kind of deadly discrimination. Even more horrific still, New Zealand’s new law includes no requirement that babies born alive after botched abortions be given medical support. This was no accident. Prime Minister Ardern was herself among the loudest voices resisting any attempt to add protections for babies born alive. According to the New York Times article, “public opinion surveys show that most New Zealanders” favored liberalizing their country’s abortion laws. However, independent polling shows that the vast majority oppose specific features in this law. For instance, just 2% of Kiwi women support abortion on-demand up to birth. 93% oppose sex-selective abortion, in which a child is killed for no other reason than his or her sex. And, 94% of women polled support longstanding legal standards for New Zealand’s abortion providers. In other words, they didn’t want them relaxed at all. Perhaps the unpopularity of abortion-on-demand-for-any-reason-whatsoever is why pro-abortion politicians in New Zealand felt the need to rush through this legislation while everyone was distracted by a global pandemic. According to RightToLife.org, as the bill went through successive readings in Parliament, it lost support. In fact, the Abortion Legislation Committee heard from only 139 of the over 25,000 people who submitted public comments on the bill. For perspective, 1,500 people were allowed to speak on a recent climate change bill that received less than half as many submissions. By taking advantage of the few people paying attention and by ignoring those who were, New Zealand’s government has now enacted the most extreme abortion law in the democratic world. As a spokesperson for New Zealand’s Voice for Life described, “Our Parliament has a duty of care to consider the wellbeing and protection of all New Zealanders, including the vulnerable…they failed in that basic duty of care by passing this extreme Bill, but the hundreds of thousands of voters who opposed this Bill will not forget this failure when it is time to vote in the General Election in a few short months.” I hope this spokesperson is right. I know several prominent pro-life spokespersons in New Zealand who care deeply about the unborn, and who mourn this evil law. I also know how entrenched and relentless pro-abortion advocates can be, and how effective they are in passing increasingly extreme legislation. We’ve certainly witnessed as much in this country, most memorably in New York, where legislators applauded and lit the One World Trade Center in pink to celebrate. Bad laws are built on bad ideas, and bad ideas have victims. The precious and unique lives made in God’s image which will now be legally targeted is a stain on one of the world’s most naturally beautiful and culturally enjoyable nations. I join so many of my friends in New Zealand who hope and pray that this law will prove a step too far, betraying an abortion movement opposed not just by champions of life, but by growing scientific knowledge, by growing compassion for children with disabilities, by the amazing medical breakthroughs in life-saving technologies, and by the unshakeable truth that unborn persons are fully human and worthy of life.

Food, Natural Health Care, News, Nutrition

Eating Dates Produces Powerful Health Benefits, Religion and Science Agree

Leave a comment
Posted on:

Friday, July 6th 2018 at 6:15 am

Written By:

Sayer Ji, Founder

Since biblical times, dates were to believed to possess profound healing properties, but only now is science catching up to confirm our distant ancestors knew exactly what they were talking about. 

If you go by the Nutrition Facts panel of an ordinary package of dates, they look more like sugar bombs than a healthy snack. Check this one out:

But are they really as nutritionally vapid as these label claims make them seem?

Not by a long shot.

When we apply the complementary lenses of modern scientific investigation and ancient wisdom, dates begin to look like both a holy- and a super-food of immense value.

Here’s a neat example.

From the Koran to Clinical Trials: Dates for Better Birthing

In the Koran, the central holy book of Islam, Allah instructs the Virgin Mary to consume dates when she gives birth to Jesus.[1] And so, not surprisingly, dates are commonly referred to within the Islamic tradition as beneficial to pregnant women. We might chalk this up as “pre-scientific” magical thinking without basis in medical fact, were it not for a remarkable human clinical study that confirmed their value in pregnancy…

Published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology in 2011 and titled, “The effect of late pregnancy consumption of date fruit on labour and delivery“, researchers set out to investigate the effect of date fruit consumption on labor parameters and birth outcomes. Over the course of 11 months at Jordan University of Science and Technology, two groups of women were enrolled in a prospective study where 69 women consumed six date fruits per day for 4 weeks prior to their estimated date of delivery, versus 45 women who consumed none. These women were matched so there was no significant difference in gestational age, age and parity (the number of times a woman has brought a pregnancy to viable gestational age) between the two groups.

READ MORE
© [Article Date] GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter
Flu vaccine, Health, News, Vaccines

Epidemiologist for CDC Says he Would ‘NEVER Give his Pregnant Wife’ a Flu Shot

1 Comment

Pregnant women here in NZ are being encouraged to take vaccines into their bodies, many containing the hazardous material mercury aka thimerasol, not to mention aluminum & other toxic substances, when they’ve not been tested on children or the unborn (ask to see the inserts &/or ask for the research that says it’s safe). It has all been okayed by the powers that be. Time to do your own thorough research folks. Babies’ brains are yet undeveloped in the womb. Why take the risk? See our other articles on topic under categories (left of page there).  EnvirowatchRangitikei

From naturalsociety.com

Dr. William Thompson used to work for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the US. The CDC recommends an annual flu vaccine for everyone 6 months and older, but Dr Thompson admits he would never give his pregnant wife a flu shot because many contain thimerosal, a mercury-containing adjuvant that he warns can be linked to toxic effects and “autism-like-features.”
You can watch a video here, uploaded by the Autism Media Channel, of Dr. Thompson speaking very clearly about his concerns. The question is – why is this not in the mainstream media? The notion that a CDC official would make this statement is very interesting.

Dr. Thompson has co-authored papers on the subject that have shown up in the New England Journal of Medicine, one, for instance, titled, “Early Thimerosal Exposure and Neuropsychological Outcomes at 7 to 10 Years.” This paper was published in 2007.He has said, specifically:

“I don’t know why they still give it to pregnant women . . . That’s the last person I would give mercury to.”

He also states that:

“. . .tics are four times more prevalent in kids with autism. . . There is biologic plausibility to say that thimersol is causing autism-like features.”

 

READ MORE

http://naturalsociety.com/epidemiologist-cdc-says-never-give-pregnant-wife-flu-shot/

Health, News, Nutrition, Pregnancy, Vaccines

Infant immunity Part 1 – Important information from Dr Suzanne Humphries on pregnancy, nutrition, vaccines, antibiotics & more

1 Comment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElI5q0BWKv0

Published on Mar 23, 2015

In part one Dr Humphries discusses ‘the three year pregnancy’, the importance of epigentics, nutrition, the microbiome and the trouble with vaccines and antibiotics.
PARTS 2 & 3 TO COME
Health, Natural Health Care, News

The calcium lie – from an MD

Leave a comment

First, a very short three minute clip with the essence of the message, a longer lecture in the second if you want more information. There is also a book from the speaker, Dr Robert Thomson. You will find it on the book sites. Info is within the video. Thanks to Marian Sutherland for this information. EnvirowatchRangitikei

Published on Aug 20, 2008

http://www.calciumlie.com/ – If you believe that bones are made of calcium, you have subscribed to The Calcium Lie. You’re not alone. Most consumers and, surprisingly, most doctors, believe that bones are made of calcium. Yet any basic biochemistry textbook will tell you the truth: Bones are made of at least a dozen minerals and we need all of them in perfect proportions in order to have healthy bones and healthy bodies. If you get too much calcium, through food sources or by taking supplements, you set yourself up for an array of negative health consequences, including obesity, Type 2 diabetes, Type 2 hypothyroidism, hypertension, depression, problem pregnancies and more. For more information, please visit the Calcium Lie website at: http://www.calciumlie.com/

 

 

DTaP, Flu vaccine, News

There’s absolutely NO sound science backing the assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe

2 Comments

Having heard recently of NZ GPs advising pregnant mothers to vaccinate I’m posting this for you to consider. Ask your Doctor to show you the research that tells you it’s been tested thoroughly on pregnant women. It would seem there will be little if anything to show you. You may be the guinea pig perhaps. This article is from an Dr Mercola’s website. From the article:

Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S

Check it out for yourself.
EnvirowatchRangitikei

Story at-a-glance

  • In decades past, women were as a general rule told to avoid toxic exposures during pregnancy, such as cigarette smoke, alcohol, household cleaning products, radiation, medications and other toxic exposures
  • Today, pregnant women face a set of difficult questions and choices about keeping themselves and their babies healthy, as they’re increasingly being told to get a variety of vaccines during pregnancy
  • In 2006, the CDC strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get a flu shot in any trimester. As of 2011, a pertussis-containing Tdap shot is also recommended for all pregnant women
  • The time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus has been suspended and replaced with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe
  • There’s absolutely NO sound science backing the assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe. On the contrary, there is a lack of available science and testing in this area.

By Barbara Loe Fisher

It was 1977 when I found out I was going to become a Mom. I instinctively knew I needed to be careful while I was pregnant, especially during the first two trimesters when the major organ systems of the fetus develop at a rapid rate. In the 1960s, there had been a lot of publicity about babies dying or being born without arms or legs because women had taken a drug (Thalidomide) for morning sickness in the first or second trimester of pregnancy1 and I wanted to make sure I did everything I could to protect my health and the health of my baby before and after he was born.

Mothers to be in my generation were told to take extra vitamins and eat nutritious food but, most of all, to avoid anything that could harm the developing fetus like alcohol, cigarette smoke, medications, radiation, household cleaning products and other toxic exposures. Some of us were aware of the risks of heavy anesthesia during delivery and signed up for Lamaze classes to prepare for a drug-free birth, which many obstetricians discouraged, and we chose to breastfeed, even though a lot of pediatricians were pushing formula and bottles back then.

Today, pregnant women face a different set of difficult questions and choices about keeping themselves and their babies healthy. Among them are whether or not to get vaccinations during pregnancy that public health officials, obstetricians and pediatricians say will protect pregnant women and their newborns from getting sick with influenza and B. pertussis whooping cough.

Toxic Exposures & Assumption of Safety – Is It A Good Idea?

Although since the 1970s, public health officials have recommended influenza vaccinations for pregnant women in the second or third trimester,2 relatively few obstetricians promoted the vaccine until the past decade when, in 2006, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get a flu shot in any trimester.3

Then, in 2011, a pertussis containing Tdap shot was recommended for all pregnant women, preferably after 20 weeks gestation.4 Both current vaccine recommendations are5, 6, 7 endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG),8, 9 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and other medical trade associations.10, 11

With these recommendations, the time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus has been suspended and replaced with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe. But what is the scientific evidence documenting that this assumption is a well-informed one?

Glaring Lack of Safety Testing

You have to look no further than information in the vaccine manufacturer product inserts and posted online by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to quickly answer that question.

FACT: Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S.12, 13 and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to these vaccines that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.14

READ MORE

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/10/vaccination-during-pregnancy.aspx

For further info watch the following video also on the DTAP vaccine while pregnant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peCVRK5k2A8

 

If you’re pregnant and thinking of getting the TDaP vaccine, you might want to watch this video and reconsider. Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books or Stickers for sale: http://myincredibleopinion.com On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredible… On Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forrestmaready
Aluminum, News, vaccine injury, Vaccines

Vaccines: Dr. Paul Offit’s aluminum deceptions and academic misconduct

Leave a comment

“Parents can be reassured that the trace quantities of aluminum in vaccines can’t possibly do harm.”
-Dr Paul Offit: Vaccine promoter, vaccine patent licensor, and autism pundit, 2015

Photo: heavymetals.news

From heavymetals.news
November 02, 2017 by

NOTE: Since this article as written (in 2015), CHOP and Offit removed some of their statements quoted here. I suppose they realized their statements were indefensible. This article is not maintained to track the latest nonsense from CHOP/Offit about aluminum adjuvant. 

(Article republished from VaccinePapers.org)

Dr Paul Offit is a well-known vaccine advocate and doctor at the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), where he is director of the Vaccine Information Center. The rotavirus vaccine he developed made Offit very rich. He vigorously defends vaccines in the media, often with half-truths and outright lies.

In order to defend vaccines and vaccine safety claims, Dr. Offit must also defend the practice of injecting children with aluminum adjuvant, despite the absence of evidence for safety, and substantial evidence of harm. On the CHOP website here (CHOP – Vaccines and Aluminum), Dr Offit states the following:

Aluminum and pregnancy
Aluminum quantities fluctuate naturally during normal cellular activity. It is found in all tissues and is also believed to play an important role in the development of a healthy fetus. This is supported by several findings:
*During healthy pregnancies the amount of aluminum in a woman’s blood increases.
*The amount of aluminum in the blood of the fetus increases between four and a half and six months gestation and again at eight months gestation.
*At delivery, the blood of full-term infants contains more aluminum than the mother’s, but it decreases shortly after delivery.
*The blood of premature infants has more aluminum than that of full-term infants.
*The concentrations of aluminum in brain tissue are high during gestation and highest immediately after birth.
*The breast milk of moms with premature infants contains more aluminum than that of moms who carried their babies to term.”

The CHOP page on aluminum is here: CHOP/Offit Statement on Aluminum

In these statements Dr Offit is asserting that aluminum is a nutrient, i.e. a mineral with healthful functions in the human body. This is absolutely false. Aluminum has no healthful function in the body or any living thing. It is a toxin and a toxin only, to all life forms.

The fact that aluminum concentrations increase in the blood and change in some tissues does not in any way mean or suggest that aluminum is doing good or necessary functions. Its just moving around the body as all substances are known to do. Blood lead levels can also increase during pregnancy. Of course, this doesn’t mean that lead is a nutrient or has “an important role” in the development of a healthy fetus. The only “role” lead plays in a fetus is damaging the fetus. It is the same with aluminum.

These statements by Dr Offit are deceptive and unscientific. Dr Offit is deceiving those that are not well educated in nutrition or medicine. This behavior by Dr Offit is shameful.

What is actually happening with aluminum blood levels during pregnancy is that aluminum is being mobilized from the bone. The bone is a storage site for aluminum, just as it is for lead. Toxic metals in bone tend to cause less damage than other places, like the brain. So putting toxic metals in bone minimizes the harm they cause. During pregnancy, minerals are drawn out of bones to be used by the developing fetus. This is well known. Consequently, toxic metals stored in the bone are released as well. Both aluminum and lead are released by bone de-mineralization during pregnancy.

Consider this case report of a woman that experienced a 3-fold rise in blood lead levels during pregnancy, caused by lead being mobilized from the bone. The same thing happens with aluminum. Its ridiculous to say that this means aluminum or lead “plays an important role” in the fetus.

“We report the case of an adult female who had last been exposed to lead 7 years earlier but now presented with symptoms and findings of acute lead poisoning which we treated with chelation therapy. In the absence of an acute lead exposure, her increased lead levels were likely due to increased mobilization and redistribution from mineralized tissues during and after a recent pregnancy.”

Full paper: Lead Poisoning in an Adult: Lead Mobilization by Pregnancy

Increase in blood levels during pregnancy does not mean that aluminum is “playing an important role in the development of a healthy fetus”.

Offit the Illogical
Dr Offit seems to think that the following observations are evidence that aluminum is a nutrient with beneficial, healthful functions in a fetus. Offit says the following on the CHOP website:

*The blood of premature infants has more aluminum than that of full-term infants.”
*The breast milk of moms with premature infants contains more aluminum than that of moms who carried their babies to term.“

In view of the well known and proven toxic effects of aluminum, its exactly the opposite.

READ MORE

http://heavymetals.news/2017-11-02-dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-and-academic-misconduct.html

News, vaccine injury, Vaccines

Vaccination during Pregnancy; Is it safe?

Leave a comment

Published on Nov 14, 2013

Vaccination During Pregnancy: Is It Safe? by Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC, National Vaccine Information Center, reviews the lack of scientific evidence that it is safe to give pregnant women influenza and Tdap shots in any trimester during every pregnancy.
News, Vaccines

Vaccines while pregnant injured my daughter

Leave a comment

Not a good idea to vaccinate in utero, we’ve had other vids about this. The foetal brain is still undeveloped and there are no guarantees for safety. Remember the companies are protected, not you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3uTYzxWdUo&feature=em-lss

Streamed live on Sep 6, 2017

RELATED

If you’re pregnant and thinking of getting the TDaP vaccine, you might want to watch this video and reconsider. Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books or Stickers for sale: http://myincredibleopinion.com On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredible…

RELATED

CDC-funded study confirms flu shots linked to spontaneous abortions… vaccine experts rush to explain away the findings

(Natural News) A CDC-funded medical study being published by the medical journal Vaccine has confirmed a shocking link between flu shots and spontaneous abortions in pregnant women. The study was rejected by two previous medical journals before Vaccine agreed to publish it, further underscoring the tendency for medical journals to censor any science that doesn’t agree with their pro-vaccine narratives.

“A study published today in Vaccine suggests a strong association between receiving repeated doses of the seasonal influenza vaccine and miscarriage,” writes CIDRAP, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

“A puzzling study of U.S. pregnancies found that women who had miscarriages between 2010 and 2012 were more likely to have had back-to-back annual flu shots that included protection against swine flu,” reports Medical Xpress, a pro-vaccine news site that promotes vaccine industry interests. Notice that the opening paragraph of their study assumed the study couldn’t possibly be true. It’s “puzzling” that mercury in flu shots could cause spontaneous abortions, you see, because these people have no understanding of biochemistry and the laws of cause and effect.

“That study was conducted after the CDC made the recommendation 2004 that all pregnant woman in all trimesters get the seasonal flu shot,” explains CIDRAP. That’s because the CDC is primarily a vaccine propaganda front group that buries whatever science it doesn’t like while promoting the interests of vaccine manufacturers.

400% increase in miscarriages among pregnant women who receive vaccines

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-13-cdc-funded-study-confirms-flu-shots-linked-to-spontaneous-abortions-vaccine-experts-rush-to-explain-away-the-findings.html

News, Vaccines

Vaccines for my Fetus? No thanks!

Leave a comment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peCVRK5k2A8

Published on Feb 8, 2017

If you’re pregnant and thinking of getting the TDaP vaccine, you might want to watch this video and reconsider.

Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books or Stickers for sale:
http://myincredibleopinion.com

On Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredible…

On Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/forrestmaready

Fluoride, Health, News, Water

How Fluoride Poisons You – Dr Mullinex

3 Comments

 

David Kennedy, DDS
Published on Nov 1, 2013

Dr. Mullenix gives an excellent description to the IAOMT of exactly how the fluoride ion interacts with human physiology to cause numerous adverse health effects. She describes in some detail its effects on various organ systems in clouding the issues her research into neurological impairment especially during pregnancy raised in 1995. Many dental offices apply topical fluoride during pregnancy. This would appear to be very unwise considering the fact that Dr. Mullenix used exactly the same level of blood fluoride in her experiment as a child will experience from this procedure.

See our Fluoride pages for more info & links, &/or search ‘categories’ for further related articles (at left of any page). 

Please consider  liking our FB page &/or following our blog, and do spread the word on all the untruths we have been told!

 

EnvirowatchRangitikei

Additives, Corporations, Food, Health, Related Chemical Websites

The Dangerous Effects of Trans Fats in Pregnancy … From GreenMedInfo

Leave a comment

This is from Eleni Roumeliotou at one of my favourite sites … a reminder for vigilant checks of those packaging labels. Those sneaky ingredients that look harmless enough and we pass over … be aware and check the facts.

“Trans fats are known to sabotage heart health since the 90s, yet remain a main ingredient in industrial, processed food. Since nutrition during pregnancy affects the baby´s long-term health and brain development and functions depend on dietary fat intake, we should worry about the impact of trans-fats on the brain of unborn children and the next generation in general…”

Note: don’t forget to check for a next page on GreenMed articles. Often I’ve missed the fact there’s more.      Read the article at the GreenMedInfo site HERE

This weekend I’ll be updating on the Rangitikei & the glyphosate spraying issue with Council. Much is developing on the ban glyphosate front world wide (will update on that too) … hopefully it will gain traction here in NZ soon.

~ envirowatchrangitikei ~