Tag Archives: Oncology

Covid-19 experimental injection

Top Oncologist Warns Covid ‘Boosters’ Trigger Cancer Death Surges

Leave a comment

By Frank Bergman

A world-renowned oncologist has issued a chilling warning after uncovering evidence that the Covid mRNA “booster” shots have caused huge waves of cancer deaths among those who received the injections.

The warning was issued by Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s University of London and a leading vaccine researcher.

Dr. Dalgleish is sounding the alarm over the surging numbers of cancer deaths currently being recorded among those who received the so-called “boosters.”

In a new statement, Dalgleish warns that cancer cases and related deaths are now skyrocketing among those who received the injections.

The highly respected oncologist explains that the mRNA shots “suppress the immune system” and “drive” the surging cancer cases.

He asserts that the Covid mRNA “booster” program may have been one of the greatest medical missteps in modern history.

Dalgleish, who is celebrated globally for his contributions to HIV/AIDS research, has been one of the leading voices in raising concerns about the safety of the injections.

He is now warning the public directly about his alarming findings linking the mRNA shots to devastating cancer spikes.

His critique is based on a series of alarming observations regarding the impact of the boosters on the immune system.

Dalgleish is particularly concerned about how the shots were rolled out for public use and the horrific consequences they have had on the health of millions.

According to Dr. Dalgleish, the boosters were initially introduced based on the premise of falling antibody levels.

While it’s normal for antibody levels to decrease following vaccination or infection, this drop was misinterpreted as a sign that additional boosters were needed.

However, Dalgleish stresses that the real defense against infections lies not in antibodies, but in T cells.

T cells are a more long-lasting and critical component of the immune system.

The booster shots, he argues, not only failed to improve immunity but actually suppressed T-cell immunity.

This suppression left people more vulnerable to infections.

Furthermore, Dalgleish points out that the boosters targeted an extinct strain of the Covid virus that had “already left the planet.”

This rendered them essentially useless against newer, more contagious variants that emerged, Dalgleish explains.

This failure to adapt the boosters to evolving strains further undermined the effectiveness of the “vaccination” strategy.

With the “boosters” ineffective against the virus, the only thing left they could do was cause harm.

What Dr. Dalgleish found to be particularly troubling was the harmful shift in how the immune system responded to the “boosters.”

Instead of providing robust protection, the injections switched antibodies from a “protective” mode to a “tolerizing” state.

This effectively made the body more susceptible to infections.

This issue became even more pronounced in cancer patients, he noted.

Dalgleish observed a dramatic increase in cancer relapses post-booster.

His early observations were met with hostility and silencing, as he was dismissed by institutions that labeled his warnings as “anecdotal.”

Now, global data has confirmed Dalgleish’s findings.

Recent national data from Japan shows a significant rise in cancer cases that can be directly linked to the “vaccine” program.

“The cancer incidence has gone up in Japan, just due to the ‘vaccine’ program,” Dalgleish explains.

He notes that the official data from Japan is more “trusted” than other nations because the government doesn’t “fiddle” with the statistics.

Dalgleish added that the Japanese data appears to show that cancer deaths are emerging roughly two years after people received mRNA “booster” injections.

This confirmation from worldwide scientific communities has validated his claims, as he explained:

“They called me reckless.

“Now, the evidence speaks for itself.”

WATCH:

Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boost

The cover-up surrounding these findings has been a source of immense frustration for Dr. Dalgleish.

He revealed that he was bullied, censored, and ignored by the very institutions that should have prioritized patient safety.

The guiding principle of “first, do no harm” was, in his view, abandoned as patients were pressured into receiving boosters.

However, these mRNA injections ultimately worsened their outcomes, Dalgleish notes.

Now that the truth is coming to light, Dalgleish is calling for accountability.

Meanwhile, a leading biochemist has issued a warning over surges in colon cancer cases among children who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Dr. Jessica Rose, a respected researcher known for her in-depth analyses of vaccine safety data, says the evidence now shows a disturbing correlation between the mRNA rollout and skyrocketing colon cancer cases.

As Slay News reported, Rose analyzed data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

According to Rose, VAERS data reveals a staggering “8,300% increase in colon cancer” that is directly linked to the Covid mRNA “vaccine” rollout timeframes.

Scientists around the world are now confirming that the boosters did significant damage to immune responses and contributed to the acceleration of deadly cancers.

What was once dismissed as reckless or anecdotal is now undeniable.

The consequences are becoming impossible to ignore.

READ MORE – Japan Issues Alert as Covid ‘Vaccine’ Spike Found in Breast Cancer Tumors

Photo credit: slaynews.com

 

cancer, Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Alarming rise in post-jab “turbo cancers”

Leave a comment

From mercola.com

Video Link

Story at-a-glance

  • Oncologists are reporting an alarming rise in post-jab “turbo cancers,” a term coined to describe incredibly rapid-growing cancers in people who have received one or more COVID jabs
  • Turbo cancers are showing up in young people, many under the age of 30, with no family history of cancer. They’re also showing up in pregnant women and young children
  • Most turbo cancers are Stage 3 or 4 by the time they’re diagnosed, yet symptoms only arose days or weeks ago. They grow and spread so rapidly, many patients die before treatment can even begin. Most turbo cancers are also resistant to conventional treatment
  • There are several possible mechanisms of the COVID shots that can lead to cancer in susceptible individuals. The primary one is the modification of the mRNA used. Pseudouridine was inserted to stabilize the RNA. The resulting protein can easily get misfolded, and protein misfolding is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and heart failure
  • The pseudouridine insertion can also suppress your innate immune surveillance by dampening the activity of toll-like receptors, and reduced cancer surveillance is a downstream effect of that

In a September 22, 2023, Highwire interview (video above), Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis discussed the alarming rise in post-jab “turbo cancers,” a term coined to describe incredibly rapid-growing cancers in people who have received one or more COVID jabs.

One example of this is detailed in a September 2023 case report1 co-written by Dr. Peter McCullough. It describes the rapid deterioration of a 56-year-old man who within days of his COVID shot developed Bell’s palsy, which progressed into an aggressive tumor on his ear and face. As noted in the abstract:2

“The malignancy was of cutaneous origin and the case showed symptoms consistent with Bell’s palsy and trigeminal neuralgia beginning four days post-vaccination … In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination.

We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer.

The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease. This can be avoidable with early diagnosis and adequate treatment.

Since facial paralysis/pain is one of the more common adverse neurological events following mRNA injection, careful inspection of cutaneous/soft tissue should be conducted to rule out malignancy.

An extensive literature review is carried out, in order to elucidate the toxicity of mRNA vaccination that may have led to the death of this patient. Preventive and precise routine clinical investigations can potentially avoid future mortalities.”

Another case report,3 published in November 2021, described the remarkably rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma in a 66-year-old man, mere days after he got his third Pfizer shot.

Ironically, he got the shot to protect him during chemotherapy, and in eight days, the cancer just exploded and spread like wildfire. According to Makis, that kind of progression would normally take a couple of years, or at most a few months.

Turbo Cancers — A New COVID Era Phenomenon

As noted by Makis, we’re now seeing the emergence of rapid-growing cancers of the breast, colon, esophagus, kidney, liver, pancreas, bile duct, brain, lung and blood — including exceedingly rare types of cancer.

But that’s not all. These cancers are showing up in young people, many under the age of 30, with no family history of cancer. They’re showing up in pregnant women and young children. Equally odd is the fact that most are Stage 3 or 4 by the time they’re diagnosed, yet symptoms only arose days or weeks ago.

The cancers grow and spread so rapidly, many of these patients die before treatment can even begin. Most of them are also resistant to conventional treatment and don’t respond. “I’ve never seen cancer behave like this,” Makis says, and he should know, having diagnosed 20,000 cancer patients in his career so far.

Makis first caught wind of this phenomenon when he started tracking the sudden deaths of Canadian doctors, who had to take the full battery of COVID shots to keep their jobs. Within months, there was a rash of sudden deaths among them, many due to heart attacks and dying in their sleep. But there was also a large group of doctors who developed aggressive cancers.

Makis points out that when you look at Go Fund Me pages asking for donations for cancer treatment, a large portion of these people are in professions that were mandated to take the shots, such as medical professionals and school teachers, police officers, fire fighters, military personnel and airline crews.

Potential Mechanisms of Action

When asked how the COVID shots might be causing these turbo cancers, Makis describes several possible mechanisms that can lead to cancer in susceptible individuals. The primary one is the modification of the mRNA used.

The COVID shots do not contain the identical mRNA found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The mRNA has been genetically manipulated in a process called “codon optimization,” where pseudouridine is inserted to stabilize the RNA and prevent rapid breakdown.4

The reason codon optimization was used is because it’s difficult to get your body to produce a given protein by injecting mRNA. Not only is it rapidly destroyed, but for the injection to work, they also need higher levels of protein expression than is naturally possible.

They bypassed this problem by making substitutions in the genetic instructions. You can swap out certain nucleotides (three nucleotides make up a codon) and still end up with the same protein in the end, but the increased efficiency comes at a terrible cost.

When substituting parts of the code in this way, the resulting protein can easily get misfolded, and this has been linked to a variety of chronic diseases,5 including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and heart failure.6

As explained by Makis, the pseudouridine insertion can also suppress your innate immune surveillance by dampening the activity of toll-like receptors, and one downstream effect of that is reduced cancer surveillance.

The more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage, the greater your risk of impaired cancer surveillance and hence, the greater your risk of turbo cancer.

Other possible mechanisms include:

• Genomic integration of the modified mRNA through reverse transcription, which might disrupt tumor suppressor genes.

• Genomic integration of DNA contaminants in the shots, which might disrupt tumor suppressor genes.

• Tumors may so be promoted by the presence of an SV40 promoter in the DNA contaminants.

• The liposomal nanoparticles (LNPs) spread the mRNA systemically, to all tissues, with severe impacts on your immune function. We now know that some individuals continue to produce spike protein for at least six months, and when your body is repeatedly (let alone continuously) exposed to the same antigen, it creates tolerance.

As a result, you become more prone to infection because your immune system no longer puts up a fight against the antigen. However, the same antibodies that target infections also target cancer cells, so your cancer risk goes up as well.

• Plasmid DNA can also be taken up by gut bacteria, causing them to become a source of constant antigen (spike protein) production.

Download this Article Before it Disappears

Download PDF

Rise in Cancer Will Likely Be a Long Term Trend

Within the first year of the rollout of the COVID shots, all-cause mortality started rising in countries around the world, and again, it’s younger, working-age people who are dying at unprecedented rates.

The good news is that booster uptake has cratered in the last six months. In Canada, only 5% to 6% have gotten boosted. The bad news is that the avalanche of cancers is likely to continue long term.

Cancer deaths are also likely to continue going up, because if we don’t know the exact mechanism behind them, we cannot treat them, Makis notes, and both chemo and radiation are proving useless. They don’t work against these rapid-onset cancers.

A key take-home here is that the more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage, the greater your risk of impaired cancer surveillance and hence, the greater your risk of turbo cancer.

Lethal Post-Jab Brain and Heart Injuries (video)

Cancer isn’t the only hazard the jabbed face. In the video above, John Campbell, a retired nurse educator, reviews the case report7 of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 shot. The autopsy revealed massive heart and brain damage.

The first jab he got was AstraZeneca’s adenoviral vector shot. The subsequent two were by Pfizer. As noted by Campbell, while some argue that heart and brain damage is a risk of COVID infection but not the shots, this case report conclusively demonstrated that this damage was caused by the shots, and not natural infection. As reported in the abstract:8

“… histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis … as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction.

In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed.

Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels.

Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.”

Is Fertility Being Affected as Well?

Recent research also confirms earlier reports9 of menstrual breakthrough bleeding among pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women, the implications of which are still unknown. As reported by Medical Xpress, October 2, 2023:10

“Research by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway, suggests that COVID-19 vaccines or the body’s response to them can lead to unexpected vaginal bleeding in women. This phenomenon was observed in women across different reproductive stages.

In a paper,11 ‘Unexpected vaginal bleeding and COVID-19 vaccination in nonmenstruating women,’ published in Science Advances, the team of public health researchers detail their findings that raise the possibility that the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is targeted by the vaccines, might be involved in this phenomenon …

The study included approximately 22,000 participants, aged 32 to 64, from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and the Senior cohort, ages 65 to 80.

Unexpected vaginal bleeding was reported in 3.3% of postmenopausal women, 14.1% of perimenopausal women, and 13.1% of premenopausal women, more than three times the expected rates. Around half of the women who reported unexpected vaginal bleeding experienced it within 28 days after a COVID-19 vaccination.”

Importantly, the study found that only 31% of women who reported abnormal bleeding patterns sought medical care for it, and even fewer sought medical help when the bleeding occurred after their COVID shot. As a result, this side effect is not being captured by health care-related databases.

Got the Jab? Take Action to Safeguard Your Health

If you already got one or more jabs and now have concerns about your health, what can you do? Well, first and foremost, never take another COVID booster, another mRNA gene therapy shot or regular vaccine. You need to end the assault on your system.

If you developed symptoms you didn’t have before your shot, I would encourage you to seek out expert help. In light of the frequency of turbo cancers, postmenopausal women with breakthrough bleeding after their COVID jab would probably be wise to get evaluated to rule out endometrial cancer.

At present, the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) seems to have one of the best treatment protocols for post-jab injuries. It’s called I-RECOVER and can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.12

Dr. Pierre Kory, who cofounded the FLCCC, has transitioned to treating the vaccine injured more or less exclusively. For more information, see DrPierreKory.com. Dr. Peter McCullough is also investigating post-jab treatments, which you can find on PeterMcCulloughMD.com.

The World Health Council has also published lists of remedies that can help inhibit, neutralize and eliminate spike protein, which most experts agree is the primary culprit. I covered these in my 2021 article, “World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox.”

Sources and References

SOURCE

Photo: pixabay.com

Breast Cancer, cancer, Chemotherapy, Health, News

Chemotherapy Losing (Lost?) Its Luster

Leave a comment

Story at-a-glance

  • Research dating back over a decade suggests many women with breast cancer can opt for gentler versions of chemotherapy, or skip it altogether, without harming their chances of recovery
  • According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), many cancer patients are being overtreated to their detriment; an estimated 70 percent of women with early stage breast cancer probably do not need chemotherapy, and fare just as well without it
  • The Oncotype DX test can help determine whether a breast cancer patient might benefit from chemo by measuring the activity of 21 genes involved in cancer recurrence
  • According to ASCO’s findings, women with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer that test negative for HER2, and whose tumors are smaller than 5 centimeters, have not spread to the lymph nodes, and have an Oncotype DX score between 11 and 25, can forgo chemo
  • An increasing number of cancer patients are now electing not to use chemo. A recent survey found the overall use of chemo declined from 34.5 to 21.3 percent between 2013 and 2015

By Dr. Mercola

Surgery, drugs and radiation — aka the “cut, poison, burn” strategy — are typically the only solutions offered by most conventional oncologists to treat cancer, and upon receiving a cancer diagnosis most people are willing to do just about anything to get better. Unfortunately, the standard of care for cancer is not necessarily the most effective.

Research dating back over a decade suggests many women with breast cancer can opt for gentler versions of chemotherapy, or skip it altogether, without harming their chances of recovery. One 2007 study found some breast cancer patients had better outcomes when given Taxotere, a milder chemotherapy drug than Adriamycin, which had been the standard for decades.1

Another suggested the Oncotype DX test2,3 may be able to help determine whether a breast cancer patient might benefit from chemo by measuring the activity of 21 genes involved in cancer recurrence. At the time, Dr. Eric Winer of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston said,4 “We are backing off on chemotherapy and using chemotherapy more selectively.” Now, a number of additional studies have come to the same conclusion: Many breast cancer patients do not need chemotherapy, and have better outcomes without it.

Many Cancer Patients Fare Better Without Chemo

According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), many cancer patients are being overtreated to their detriment; an estimated 70 percent of women with early stage breast cancer probably do not need chemotherapy, and fare just as well without it.5 As reported by NPR:6

“One dramatic example revealed at the [2018 ASCO] meeting relates to the most common form of breast cancer, known as hormone-positive, HER-2 negative disease. For many women who have this diagnosis, but for whom the disease has not spread to lymph nodes, a new study7,8 finds that anti-hormone treatment after surgery is enough, and women won’t benefit from rounds of toxic and uncomfortable chemotherapy.

Treatment of breast cancer for this large group of women will become easier. And for the many women who already choose not to undertake chemotherapy, they can be reassured that it’s the right call. Likewise, researchers from France presented evidence that people with severe colon cancer don’t benefit from a common treatment, which involves heated chemotherapy administered at the time of surgery.

This treatment has been in use for 15 years, without good evidence that it actually works … The study9 of 265 patients found that it didn’t work … The study is ‘an excellent example of how less is more,’ when it comes to certain cancer treatments, says Dr. Andrew Epstein, an oncologist from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who spoke on behalf of ASCO.”

Breast Cancer, cancer, News

The ‘Deadly Breast Cancer Gene’ is a Myth, Lancet Study Confirms

2 Comments

Sayer Ji, Green Med Info
Waking Times 

A new Lancet Oncology study, reported widely in the mainstream media, confirms that the so-called “breast cancer genes,” i.e. BRCA1/2, do not have the power to determine breast cancer survival outcomes, as widely believed by the medical profession.

The study titled, “Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study,” found,

“[There is] no significant difference in overall survival or distant disease-free survival between patients carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and patients without these mutations after a diagnosis of breast cancer.”

The BBC broke down the study’s findings in greater detail, in their online article titled, “Breast cancer survival ‘unaffected by faulty gene‘”

“The study, published in The Lancet Oncology, found 12% of 2,733 women aged 18 to 40 treated for breast cancer at 127 hospitals across the UK between 2000 and 2008 had a BRCA mutation.

The women’s medical records were tracked for up to 10 years.

During this time, 651 of the women died from breast cancer, and those with the BRCA mutation were equally likely to have survived at the two-, five- and 10-year mark as those without the genetic mutation.

This was not affected by the women’s body mass index or ethnicity.

About a third of those with the BRCA mutation had a double mastectomy to remove both breasts after being diagnosed with cancer. This surgery did not appear to improve their chances of survival at the 10-year mark.”

The study has powerful implications for the future of breast screening programs and the standard of care for ‘breast cancer’ patients. So powerful is the belief that BRCA genes ’cause’ breast cancer, that millions around the world consider it fact. Celebrities like Angelina Jolie have added fuel to the fire of this dangerous myth, by electing to have her breasts removed ‘prophylactically’ due to her BRCA status and the recommendations of her physicians. I discussed questionable nature of this decision in a previous article titled, Did Angelina Jolie Make A Mistake By Acting On The ‘Breast Cancer Gene’ Theory? I elaborated further on the topic in an article titled, “Pinkwashing Hell: Breast Removal as a Form of ‘Prevention‘.”

READ MORE

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/01/17/deadly-breast-cancer-gene-myth-lancet-study-confirms/?utm_source=Waking+Times+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2b8798e717-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_25f1e048c1-2b8798e717-54601985

cancer, Chemotherapy, News

Traditional cancer treatments cause inflammation, promoting aggressive tumor growth, according to study

Leave a comment

(Natural News) Independent media leaders like Mike Adams, the Health Ranger and editor of Natural News, have long been vilified by the mainstream media for daring to insist that chemotherapy actually causes cancer. Time and again, Natural News has published articles based on scientific studies that prove the inefficiency and downright danger of conventional cancer treatments. Now, yet another study has been published confirming that link.

The study, conducted by a research team from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and published in the Journal of Experimental Medicine, found that the dead and dying cancer cells created by chemotherapy trigger inflammation which in turn promotes “aggressive tumor growth.”

“In this study we demonstrate that chemotherapy-generated debris from dead and dying tumor cells can stimulate tumor growth, which has pivotal implications for the treatment of cancer patients,” said Dipak Panigrahy, MD, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor at BIDMC’s Department of Pathology. “Conventional cancer therapy designed to kill tumor cells is inherently a double-edged sword.” [Emphasis added]

News Wise notes that this research reinforces what the medical community has known since at least the 1950s, but it is the first study to try to determine the exact molecular mechanisms that cause this phenomenon.

Researchers have long understood that there is a distinct link between inflammation and cancer. A study published in the journal Nature in 2010, for example, noted:

Recent data have expanded the concept that inflammation is a critical component of tumour progression. Many cancers arise from sites of infection, chronic irritation and inflammation. It is now becoming clear that the tumour microenvironment [the infrastructure supporting the tumor], which is largely orchestrated by inflammatory cells, is an indispensable participant in the neoplastic process, fostering proliferation, survival and migration.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-12-28-traditional-cancer-treatments-cause-inflammation-promoting-aggressive-tumor-growth-according-to-study.html

cancer, Health, News, Vaccines

Cancer industry profits ‘locked in’ by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines… spurs tumor growth… explains aggressive vaccine push

2 Comments

chemotherapy-448578_1280
Chemotherapy works just 3% of the time

More proof here from NaturalNews of the scam behind the very, very lucrative cancer industry. Why they do not want you to know of the alternative cures. Why holistic practitioners have been disappearing/dying/suiciding/falling victim to murder in growing numbers (covered in this article also). Why there is no media excitement over the miraculous recoveries by treatments other than chemo, radiation and surgery (which only works 3% of the time). Join the dots people … like all the other death industries … RF radiation , chemicals, GMOs, geoengineering, fracking to name a few … the fine print if there’s any, is just that, very fine print and they depend on your not bothering to read it. Educate yourself, read the data and make informed decisions to protect your families … this is not scaremongering, it is fact … and the article featured here reveals even more of the low depths greed will go to deceive you to make a buck.

EnvirowatchRangitikei

“(NaturalNews) One of the world’s most lucrative industries, spending on cancer drugs reached an all-time high last year, as it was valued at more than $100 billion. Spending on cancer drugs increased 6.5 percent annually over the past five years and is expected to continue growing at a rate of 8 percent each year through 2018, according to figures provided by the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics.

….billions and billions of dollars are secured by Americans being diagnosed with cancer.

That’s one profitable industry; however, it could all be completely dismantled by one thing: a cure.

As Mike Adams recently reported, “A universal cancer cure would destroy the profitability of the highly lucrative cancer industry and collapse the American Cancer Society, hospitals, oncology clinics and pharmaceutical companies that depend on chemotherapy revenues to stay profitable.”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html#ixzz3uyeLk7X5

 

cancer, Health, News

Modern Medicine’s cure rate for cancer is only 3%

4 Comments

Written by Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.

“According to an oncology journal, the overall five-year cure rate of medical doctors (i.e. oncologists), on newly diagnosed cancer patients, is 3% (Clinical Oncology (2004) 16: 549-560).

Let me say this another way: in five years after diagnosis, 97% of the cancer patients of the medical community are dead.

You probably think that this “cure rate” is excellent because cancer is such a mysterious disease and it is so hard to cure. You have been told that DNA damage is what causes cancer and that it will be 50 years before a cure for cancer will be found.

The truth is that the 3% cure rate is inexcusable. If you can safely target and kill cancer cells, what difference does it make that cancer cells have DNA damage!! Killing sick cells should be easy, even if they have DNA damage.

Is there proof that someone has had a cure rate higher than 3%?

Dr. William D. Kelley, a cancer researcher, worked with more than 33,000 cancer patients and his five-year cure rate on newly diagnosed cancer patients was about 90%, not 3%.”

Read More: http://www.cancertutor.com/index4/

cancer, Chemotherapy, Health

An ND Says Chemo Does Not Work 97% of The Time

Leave a comment
Published on Dec 16, 2013“Check these links out:
Here’s Why Radiation and Chemotherapy Should Not Be The Only Two Approved Treatments For Cancer – This is an excellent overview of the history of cancer treatments & the current alternative ones. Also includes info on how these cures are squashed by TPTB. Learn also about the Rife machine that cures cancer that was also destroyed.
See more at: http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/03/h…

The Rife Machine info here: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2…
Chemotherapy Myth Shattered: Toxic Drugs Cause More Cancer Than They Prevent
http://lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2…

The medical profession never tells us our chances of survival with chemotherapy. Hear some insightful truths about why. Corporate profit has sadly become the bottom line in most industries and the medical profession is not exempt. Educate yourself and be informed about other alternatives to the mainstream paths. There are many testimonies online by people who have beaten cancer by other methods … what is there to lose? ”

COMMENT:

Check out the Cancer page on the site … particularly the page on alternative protocols. There are many, yet tediously every year the pharmaceutical industry makes out like there aren’t. Every year, faithfully they ask us for more donations to research a cure. Yet they never tell us about environmental causes that have been written about for decades. Read Dr Samuel Epstein’s book ‘The Politics of Cancer’ written in the 1970s. They are seriously dragging the chain … and for what reason? People remain in disbelief when faced with these very verifiable facts … and regularly retreat into denial. If you or a loved one are suffering from this plague, please research the facts. You will not find them in the mainstream media. Sadly.

EnvirowatchRangitikei

cancer, Health

Oncology nurse quits after discovering nutrition heals cancer

Leave a comment

From chrisbeatcancer’s channel on Youtube. Check out his site also for more links, further information on Valerie Warwick and links to her website.

“Notes at http://www.chrisbeatcancer.com/oncolo… After 17 years as an oncology nurse, Valerie Warwick took a huge risk and walked away from a lucrative income because she could not be a part of the conventional cancer industry anymore. In our interview, Valerie shares insider information about the industry as well as vital resources and therapies that every cancer patient should consider…”

Check out our page also on cancer to discover links to further information on alternative protocols that have been used by people.

EnvirowatchRangitikei

cancer, Chemotherapy, Pharmaceutical Industry

Medical Doctor concludes cancer patients live longer without chemotherapy

3 Comments

This is an eye opening article on chemo and cancer from NaturalNews. They say with no treatment at all, and without chemotherapy, patients live longer than with chemotherapy. In The Truth About Cancer’s series of interviews with Medical Doctors and Oncologists (at their website) they also confirm this. (You will also find some of the videos on Youtube).

Here is the NaturalNews article:  

syringe-435809_1280“Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, had been studying the lifespans of cancer patients for more than 25 years when he came to the conclusion that, despite popular belief, chemotherapy doesn’t work. He witnessed a multitude of cancer patients treated with the poison die horrific deaths, many of them meeting their fate much earlier than other patients who chose no treatment at all.

After investigating this further, Dr. Jones found that cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy actually died more quickly, in most cases, than those who followed their doctors’ recommendations by getting the treatment…”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/048827_chemotherapy_cancer_treatment_patient_survival.html#ixzz3ipQt9UJZ

cancer, Health

The NZ man who ‘came back from the dead’

Leave a comment

“Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.”
― Hippocrates

Featuring here, another success story in the health and wellness section. With all the bad news that’s about, we can all do with some good news.

Firstly though, to back up a little, and many of you will identify I’m sure, having seen dear friends and loved ones receive the awful news they have a terminal illness, and seen them pass on after a long struggle, I’m determined to highlight the many stories I’ve heard lately of folks who came through their dark valley with success, giving new hope for others. People who were sent home to plan their funerals, now living full lives again, back working and caring for their families.

“My journey and eventual remission in October 2013 has provided me with a new sense of purpose and appreciation of life. I hope my experiences can inspire and comfort those who are affected by cancer.” Anton Kuraia

I’ve featured on the site two wonderful success stories, one already shared, that of Anton Kuraia, the Northland Police Officer who was cured of cancer using IV Vitamin C. (Articles and videos at this link). Well here’s another story that also made headline news both in our own country NZ,  and world wide, that of Waikato farmer, Allan Smith.

Allan had been on life support for three weeks with swine flu and other complications. His Doctors had advised the family they wanted to terminate his life support, however this family wasn’t going to give up that easily! Allan, through the persistence of his family received IV Vitamin C also and is now a walking testimony of the success of that treatment. His amazing and inspiring story with links to both media coverage and Allan’s website are here. A full article by Health Impact News can be found here.

Do keep an eye on this section as I add further information, stories and interviews with health professionals, MDs and Oncologists who have had both extensive experience in their respective fields, and seen amazing recoveries from life threatening illness.

It is my aim, not to treat you (for I am not qualified), or to offer advice,  rather it is to inspire you with information from both professionals in their fields, and with stories from people like Anton and Allan who fought life threatening illnesses and survived. There are many, both abroad and in NZ.  People whose persistence paid off. Should you also wish to pursue the Vitamin C option (or any other options you learn about in your research) search online for Medical Doctors in your country and region who will administer them. Both Allan’s and Anton’s website have valuable information also about their own respective  journeys.

~ EnvirowatchRangitikei ~