Tag Archives: Insurance

Switzerland: Health insurance data shows 73% increase in people receiving cancer treatment since 2020

It won’t of course be because of ‘you know what’ …

Breaking News: New Zealand Govt Report Admits You May Die or Fall Ill After Pfizer mRNA Vaccination … But Does Advise People Not to Worry

Time series analysis of New Zealand data supports a relationship between mRNA vaccination and death that is consistent with a German autopsy study.

On 14th December 2022, Medsafe (NZ Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority) released its 46th report into the safety of Covid vaccines entitled “Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines”. The report covered safety signals up to 30th November 2022.

This report contained new advice about the risk of death following mRNA vaccination. Medsafe’s assessment began as follows:

By chance, some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly. Therefore, part of our review process includes comparing natural death rates to observed death rates following vaccination, to determine if there are any specific trends or patterns that might indicate a vaccine safety concern.”

The report comes after months of speculation concerning record levels of excess all cause mortality in New Zealand affecting all ages, currently running at 15% above historical levels.

After dropping the bombshell news, Medsafe goes through an entirely bogus and unscientific process designed to reassure the public that there is nothing to worry about. Medsafe compares the number of deaths reported to CARM (Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring) within 21 days of vaccination to the background rate of deaths from natural causes. In doing so, it omits to mention (but does so elsewhere) that CARM reports are voluntary and massively underreported by an estimated factor of 20 times. As a result there is nothing at all reassuring about this safety report.

Are There Other Reasons to Be Concerned? Yes, Many:

1. Medsafe reports, “There have been no deaths reported for the Vaxzevria or Nuvaxovid vaccines.” So why are they happening after the Pfizer vaccine?

2. Autopsies are not routinely performed in New Zealand following deaths proximate to vaccination. A recently published German study Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination reports 16% of deaths within 20 days of mRNA vaccination exhibit definitive causal symptoms of acute myocarditis, a known adverse effect of Pfizer Covid vaccination. So why is there no concerted effort here in NZ to investigate by routinely performing autopsies?

3. The Ministry of Health has consistently refused/omitted to record vaccine status on death certificates or make CARM reporting mandatory. This makes it very difficult to scientifically and reliably investigate any causal relationship between mRNA vaccination and death or serious illness. On the 17th December 2021 the director of the Covid immunisation programme wrote to me on behalf of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health, saying “An accurate measurement of all adverse events is not required”.

In the light of today’s Medsafe admission, that’s damning. Incredibly Dr. Bloomfield has just been appointed the inaugural chair of a new public policy impact institute at the University of Auckland, proposing to translate and apply research into policies that directly impact communities—but he doesn’t subscribe to accuracy??? Most people do, especially academics.

4. Medsafe argues that temporal correlation between deaths and vaccination does not prove a causal relationship between them. They, along with epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker, suggest that Covid infection or pre-existing health conditions are more likely to be causally connected to deaths following vaccination. There are in fact other relevant analyses which can determine whether there is a relationship between mRNA vaccination and proximate deaths. Among these, powerful techniques of time series analysis can discover whether deaths are consistently occurring during specific intervals of time after vaccination. This would provide strong support for a causal relationship.

Among the world’s nations, New Zealand is in a unique position to undertake this sort of analysis. In 2021 New Zealand had very few Covid infections (almost none) but the majority of the population were vaccinated over a period of eight months. Therefore deaths recorded during much of 2021 in New Zealand cannot be ascribed to any effect of Covid infection.

Preliminary data from 2021 has been analysed to investigate the proposition that mRNA vaccination resulted in deaths. This shows there is a significant (p=0.045) relationship between number of vaccines administered by week and weekly deaths at a lag of one week. In other words, there is a statistically significant increased chance of dying within a few days of vaccination. Download the study here. Despite the preliminary nature of the data in this study, the findings of this study are consistent with the findings of German autopsies. Therefore there should be more rigorous study of stored data to further test these findings

There are other simple methods to analyse death data. For example taking the date of inoculation for each individual as a notional point in time around which all death data can be assessed for entire cohorts of individuals. This would reveal whether death rates before and after inoculation differ.

5. The time series analysis does not preclude the possibility that other deaths at longer time intervals after an inoculation date may be occurring as a result of mRNA vaccination. Unprecedented rates of all cause mortality suggest this is likely to be the case. Unfortunately, the New Zealand Ministry of Health is not releasing data on causes of hospitalisation by category of illness. There is evidence we have previously reported based on US defence personal data and insurance statistics, and on UK ONS data, indicating that incidence of neurological disorders, cancers, cardiac events, and strokes have increased.

Medsafe’s position on vaccine safety has clearly shifted during the two months since it last published a safety report, but has it realised the importance of more reliable causal assessments? Apparently not. The NZ public is being kept in the dark about vaccine safety as it has been for the last two years. Bland assurances of safety continue without foundation in fact.

Can mRNA Vaccination Be a Trigger Event for Death if You Are Already Sick or Elderly?

The wording of the December 14th Medsafe warning is strange and ambiguous: “..some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly”. So are the elderly especially liable to die after vaccination because of vaccination or because they are elderly? We aren’t told.

Aside from the obviously elevated rates of excess all cause deaths, anecdotal reports from rest home staff suggest this is the case. Emergency vehicles and helicopters are answering more frequent calls. Hospitals are overwhelmed and unable to cope. Whistleblowers among nurses are talking about overflowing cardiac wards. A top UK cardiologist has suggested that the evidence of harm is overwhelming and irrefutable. Funeral home workers in New Zealand and overseas have spoken publicly about strange rubbery clots in arteries which have been confirmed by experienced pathologists in the USA. Statistically improbable increases in life insurance claims data have been noted. Sudden unexplained deaths have a high profile in the media. The message is consistent—something unprecedented and very concerning is going on.

Despite having multiple sources of data and methods of analysis available to it. Medsafe has relied for two years on a single obviously flawed method of comparing CARM data to background rates, despite admitting CARM data is underreported. How strange is that? This deficiency is fatal to Medsafe’s claims of safety. It is scientifically unjustifiable and it wouldn’t meet publication criteria.

There is no possible justification for omitting to use more reliable forms of causal investigation. Medsafe has avoided public accountability by refusing to debate the issues publicly, omitting publication of key health data, massaging published data, and unforgivably accusing critics of spreading disinformation. These approaches are worthy of a dictatorship but not a modern democracy.

https://hatchardreport.com/breaking-news-new-zealand-government-report-admits-you-may-die-or-fall-ill-after-pfizer-mrna-vaccination-but-advises-people-not-to-worry/

Photo: pixabay.com

Head of Australian Therapeutic Goods Admin (TGA), Brendan Murphy, tells Parliament to keep quiet about vaccine effects (hear it for yourself)

Shocking. If this does not illustrate for you the vast corruption that is afoot with this plandemic & subsequent vax rollout, nothing will. It is about, is there any type of insurance or backup should you be injured by one of the killer jabs. As I’ve figured all along you’d be very fortunate to have anybody at your back. The short of this story is, you will have to go to court to extract anything and as the brave person featured speaking up angrily says … ‘who can afford to go to court?’ Exactly. Any thinking person will have known all along this would be the case. Listen at the link. EWR

From seemorerocks.is

“Secret video of senate meeting with head of TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration), Brendan Murphy, telling Parliament to not tell the public of their own vaccine effects coverup and that the vaccine kills people and they have no recourse from it because the government granted big pharma immunity from prosecution and compensation payouts!

VIDEO AT THE LINK

https://seemorerocks.is/head-of-australian-tga-brendan-murphy-tells-parliament-to-keep-quiet-about-vaccine-effects/?fbclid=IwAR3EjsseviUHha8fX1t3RfABjRsK7CBebd5ZlyGXbs3xtBnCpfLWex8cb5o

Image by Sammy-Williams from Pixabay

The NZ MoH appears somewhat ‘at sea’ regarding possible compensation should you experience a CV VX injury

Remember your government has released Pfizer from any liability for their product if it happens to harm you (and it has, unless you are believing mainstream spin). Listen to this woman whose experience proved you’re on your own if things go wrong. EWR


Posted on NZ MOH site, June 3 2021

Taken from a transcript of a webinar by a MOH Covid Committee, who hold fortnightly webinars for health professionals.

Do health professionals appreciate the implications for this statement made by the facilitator, I wonder?

The facilitator states…
‘There were a couple of questions at the last meeting that came through so I’m just going to run those off quickly.
The first was around funding to support primary care when people are presenting to them with side effects following their vaccination.
There is no specific funding available to cover that and no specific funding to cover the submission of an adverse event into CARM so there isn’t any funding to cover that.
I’m going to touch base, I spoke to the post-event team leader today just to follow up with him and he’s organising for me the contacts at ACC so we can understand what is the threshold at which we can make a claim through ACC that this is a treatment injury.
I haven’t seen those yet, but we will follow that up and see where it takes us.’

I would ask, ‘see where it takes us…’ Really?’

After all this time and this is where the MOH is at? So much for robust processes, transparency, safe and effective ‘vaccine,’ post adverse injection event planning? How would the Team of 5 million respond to this absence of due diligence, if this was included in the Government Briefings, I wonder?
What can anyone expect, in terms of a duty of care, if one is unfortunate enough to experience an adverse reaction in NZ, to the Pfizer Comirnaty injection?
How much money is paid to employ the experts on this panel?
No problem finding funds for their salaries?

I would post the link, but it’s gone, along with the complete transcript and additional information. If you request it under the OIA, will you be informed that like most documents so far, this is ‘confidential?’
We seem to have an epidemic of ‘confidentiality’ for those who are employed to ensure Regulation, Assurance and Protection are complied with and no ‘Community Immunity’ for ‘Transparency.’
Maybe someone who is a health professional can access the webinar link?
The complete webinar and the section of concern, watch from the 4.12 minute mark.
https://youtu.be/hIyyJ6s0oRM

Note: the commentary for this post from fb is author unknown, please advise if you wrote it. I did try to locate the author. EWR

If the COVID injections are so safe why are insurance companies declining to cover for injuries?

Two items have come to light regarding the refusal by insurance companies to insure. This is on top of governments absolving the Pharmaceutical companies producing the injections from any liability. And we are still expected to willingly receive the jab? This is like putting your nearest and dearest on a flimsy raft without life jackets & pushing them out onto the ocean with a hurricane brewing on the horizon.

Regarding the blood clots/AstraZeneca vax issue … in spite of the news here of certain countries suspending its use because of the issue, NZ mainstream news continues to assure us there is no connection. Another coincidence I gather? EWR

Here are two related posts from C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand

Australia….Guild Insurance pausing insurance of nurses administering Covid vaccination….The Actuaries have obviously done their homework and worked out that they could potentially be bankrupted by injured vaccine recipients suing the nurses and doctors who administered the vaccine. Click on this link to see the video at FB: https://www.facebook.com/australiansvstheagenda/posts/395850001867611


Meanwhile in Australia…Nurses administering covid vaccines are no longer covered by this insurer….The government continues to assure Australians the Astra Zeneca vaccine is safe (this is the primary vax used in Australia)….And 10 European countries have now halted use pending investigation into blood clots and strokes post vax

A global consumer tax will pay for COVID vaccine injuries, with no liability for vaccine manufacturers or the organizations that distribute them (WHO)

What Could Go Wrong? WHO Launches Global ‘No-Fault’ COVID Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

The World Health Organization’s announcement this week raises questions about funding, fairness and the basic ability to execute the program, but this much is clear: taxpayers will foot the bill.

READ MORE

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-global-no-fault-covid-vaccine-injury-compensation/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=97fbd089-09df-4c4b-b6c8-ed21ed54df3b

Photo: pixabay.com

The Injection Fraud – It’s Not a Vaccine

By Catherine Austin Fitts

Excerpt: “Many of my clients and their children had been devastated and drained by health care failures and corruption – and the most common catalyst for this devastation was vaccine death and injury….

The result of this flow of bright, educated people blessed with the resources to pay for my time was that, for ten years, I got quite an education about the disabilities and death inflicted on our children by what I now call “the great poisoning.” As a result, I had the opportunity to repeatedly price out the human damage to all concerned–not just the affected children but their parents, siblings and future generations—mapping the financial costs of vaccine injury again and again and again.

These cases were not as unusual as you might expect. Currently 54% of American children have one or more chronic diseases. Doctors that I trust assure me the number is much higher as many children and their families can not afford the care and testing necessary to properly diagnose what ails them.”

READ MORE

LINK: https://virutron.com/the-injection-fraud-its-not-a-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR2kAtiUuwgAuh_fVrlpnWXYgpGfdeF4h6OUCvWJMEnbHHjNQ2fixCCKWNY

FIND OUT IF YOUR COUNCIL IS INSURED FOR LED, RF, EMF, 3G, 4G and 5G BY SENDING OFF OIA/FOI REQUEST (TEMPLATE PROVIDED)

From smombiegate.org

See the expanded versionof this post.

This will uncover the facts of whether your Council has allowed uninsurable infrastructure to go up near your homes, on your streets and public places. If they are not insured, it means that your Council will be liable. In other words, they will end up bankrupt and in a lot of trouble if a number of people began taking them to Court over health issues that they have to pay out on.

*******************************************************************************

NOTICE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 REQUEST

Dear Sirs

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, you are requested to please provide the following:

  1. Copies of all commercial [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] public liability insurance policy certificates with what is covered, policy numbers, providers and underwriters held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE]. In particular, make sure anything regarding ‘pollution liability’, ‘policy enhancement’ and ‘schedules of exclusions’ documents in relation to the commercial public liability insurance policy held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE].
  2. Copies of the ‘certificate of indemnity’ from [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] that may include the public insurance provider and underwriters, confirming that any injuries, damages or adverse health effects directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise, wireless RF radiation, microwave radiation, non-ionising radiation emitting devices and equipment.

I require written receipt of this Freedom of Information Request. Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,

Yours Sincerely

[ANY NAME HERE]

*************************************************************************

PLEASE READ: You can use https://www.whatdotheyknow.com to send the Notice over the Internet, but we always recommend to find the FOI page on your Council’s website and send an email. Also, if the Council comes back and says the FOI is over their quota, then send question one and then question two.

SOURCE: https://smombiegate.org/foi-council-liability-with-rf-emf-5g-and-led/

NOTE: smombiegate.org have asked for your feedback with results if you use this FOI template

 

Image by Ronny Overhate from Pixabay

 

A county in Ireland suspends 5G due to health concerns & non coverage by insurance

Laois County, Ireland Suspends 5G Due to Health Concerns & Non-Coverage by Insurance

From smombiegate.org

Public concerns around potential health hazards of 5G technology have led to calls for its rollout to be suspended until these matters can be independently investigated and resolved.

Leading the charge for 5G to be put on hold until such time as public anxieties around its health and safety can be allayed is Cllr Aisling Moran.

She called on the Minister for Communications, Richard Bruton to stop the rollout of 5G, fifth generation cellular technology, across the country.

“We as a Council and public representatives have a moral and ethical responsibility to protect the health and wellbeing or all our citizens.

“There is a reason why insurance companies will not insure 5G, this needs to be investigated further by an independent company with no prospect of financial gain,” she maintained.

The motion was seconded and supported by Cllr Caroline Dwane-Stanley.

FIND OUT IF YOUR COUNCIL IS INSURED FOR LED, RF, EMF, 3G, 4G and 5G BY SENDING OFF THE FOI PROVIDED BELOW TODAY.

This will uncover the facts of whether your Council has allowed uninsurable infrastructure to go up near your homes, on your streets and public places. If they are not insured, it means that your Council will be liable. In other words, they will end up bankrupt and in a lot of trouble if a number of people began taking them to Court over health issues that they have to pay out on.

*******************************************************************************

NOTICE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 REQUEST

Dear Sirs

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, you are requested to please provide the following:

  1. Copies of all commercial [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] public liability insurance policy certificates with what is covered, policy numbers, providers and underwriters held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE]. In particular, make sure anything regarding ‘pollution liability’, ‘policy enhancement’ and ‘schedules of exclusions’ documents in relation to the commercial public liability insurance policy held by [YOUR COUNCIL HERE].
  2. Copies of the ‘certificate of indemnity’ from [YOUR COUNCIL HERE] that may include the public insurance provider and underwriters, confirming that any injuries, damages or adverse health effects directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise, wireless RF radiation, microwave radiation, non-ionising radiation emitting devices and equipment.

I require written receipt of this Freedom of Information Request. Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,

Yours Sincerely

[ANY NAME HERE]

*************************************************************************

PLEASE READ: You can use https://www.whatdotheyknow.com to send the Notice over the Internet, but we always recommend to find the FOI page on your Council’s website and send an email. Also, if the Council comes back and says the FOI is over their quota, then send question one and then question two.

SOURCE: https://smombiegate.org/foi-council-liability-with-rf-emf-5g-and-led/

NOTE: smombiegate.org have asked for your feedback with results if you use this FOI template


FULL ARTICLE SOURCE

https://smombiegate.org/laois-county-ireland-to-suspend-5g-due-to-health-concerns-non-coverage-by-insurance/

The burning of Australia: steering the world’s population towards global governance

Listen to Australian Max Igan describe information about the fires you won’t be reading about in mainstream media. For those who are awake & aware of the lies & propaganda we are being fed on a daily basis now, this will all come as no surprise. And at the same time we have a mainstream article informing us we will (of course) have to re think the way we live (aka out of the wild places, into the smart cities).  The controllers of this narrative have of course pulled insurance to make this happen. Into the surveilled smart cities where you are watched & you also fry under the newly ramped up sea of 5G frequencies about to be unleashed in NZ also, that they continue to tell us is harmless even though it’s not been tested for human and environmental safety. Literally microwave weaponry. Pack and stack is going to be a hard sell in NZ still they’re at it already with pack and stack accommodation planned for various places. And having ground down the people into poverty & hopelessness well that makes it not so hard. Cheap inner city housing. Anything better than languishing in cars, sheds and garages isn’t it? This has been well planned. See the Agenda 21/2030 pages at the main menu for more info on that. Also on point, see the recent video from Canterbury SkyWatch on the aluminum in the fires from the aircraft & geoengineering. As Max says, why are they not seeding the clouds (well known technology used world wide) to put the fires out?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgyweps5mZg

 

Bushfires force rethink about how we live

From 7news.com.au

Lives will change as bushfire seasons become longer and more fierce, a health expert has warned.

Australians are being told to rethink everything from health to housing as more than 130 blazes rage across drought-parched Queensland and NSW, claiming lives and homes.

It means people will need to change the way they live as the never-before-seen bushfires become commonplace, Queensland University of Technology environmental health Professor Hilary Bambrick says.

“In Australia, we’ve got this idea that we just rebuild after a catastrophe, and just put the same thing back there again,” she told AAP on Thursday.

https://7news.com.au/news/disaster-and-emergency/bushfires-force-rethink-about-how-we-live-c-557122?fbclid=IwAR04bau4BznavHzI0WHPcDpHxq8T2YuuYxy4DIA-3z6SWaBY7JWUeLZetks

If 5G is so Safe then Why are Lloyds Insurers Refusing To Cover 5G Wi-Fi Illnesses?

From the Public Intelligence Blog

Lloyds of London, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims made against 5G wireless (“wi-fi”) technologies.

How curious that Lloyds of London has excluded from their policies any negative health effects caused by wi-fi technologies. Now, WHY would Lloyds leave all that money on the table if these technologies are so safe? And, why are other insurance companies following Lloyds’ lead?

If you think that following-the-money provides insights, you’ll probably conclude that something VERY BIG is embedded in this decision.

Here’s some background (including links):

The FCC and other government regulatory bodies, in collusion with the big telecomm industries, are ferociously pushing smart meters, 5G and the Internet of Things.

This roll-out is not only happening in the US, but all over the world. The giant telecomms gush enthusiastically about how EVERYTHING will be connected

OMG!! We’re gonna have Incredibly high-speed connectivity so your little girls and teens can, at supersonic speed, upload pix of their latest nail-polish jobs or cute puppy videos to FaceBook, Pinterest, etc., etc., for their friends to gasp and giggle…..and, of course, click “like” and forward these to their friends…. again, all at warp speed.

It’s pretty clear that this whole “play” by the giant telecomms is seen by them as a financial windfall – for them. And, via their lobby groups, it’s seen as a windfall for all the politicians who support this agenda. Politicians will be rewarded in the usual manner – pricey junkets to exotic places, elegant dinners, campaign contributions and, of course, cushy “golden parachute” jobs for those wi-fi supportive ex-politicians within the telecomm industries, or within their lobby groups. In short, crony business as usual.

BUT WAIT!! ….There’s a tiny but growing wrinkle in this rosy scenario of sugar plums dancing in the heads of these telecomm leaders. Specifically, Lloyds of London, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims made against wireless technologies. And, other insurance companies are following Lloyd’s lead in this.

If you follow the money, this is HUGE. After all, if these wi-fi techno-toys are so safe, why is Lloyds leaving all this additional money on the table?

Well, Lloyd’s November 2010 Risk Assessment Team’s Report gives us a solid clue: the report compares these wireless technologies with asbestos, in that the early research on asbestos was “inconclusive” and only later did it become obvious to anyone paying attention that asbestos causes cancer.

Keep in mind that Lloyd’s Risk Assessment study of wi-fi was published over 8 years ago. Even back then, however, their Risk Assessment Team was smart enough to realize that new evidence just might emerge showing that the various wi-fi frequencies do cause illness. The result? Lloyds opted to exclude coverage for wi-fi related illnesses.

And then, PG&E followed close on, slipping in its own legal clauses (just as it was rolling out smart meters) that claim no liability for wi-fi related health damage. The schools who opt to put in wi-fi are responsible, according to PG&E, and any other organizations that opt to have PG&E put wi-fi in their buildings are the responsible parties

Today, MANY more recent peer-reviewed scientific studies show a range of serious damage caused by these wi-fi frequencies. 5G brings a quantum leap in damage – to DNA, to cell mitochondria, and much more.

READ MORE

https://phibetaiota.net/2019/02/yoda-lloyds-of-london-fears-emf-5g-excludes-coverage-electromagnetic-pollution-will-kill-you-maim-you-and-it-is-not-covered-by-insurance/#more-138279

Follow the money – Lloyds of London Insurance won’t cover wireless radiation hazards – that includes smart meters

From rfsafe.com:

“Letter to Government from Sharon Noble – Director of Coalition to Stop Smart Meters in BC

Premier Clark, Mr. Bennett and Mr. Reimer,

RE: Lloyd’s of London excludes coverage for claims caused by exposure to non-ionizing radiation.

“Based on inaccurate information provided by ITRON, Health Canada and Dr. Perry Kendall, you have been telling people that there is no health risk due to prolonged exposure to radiation from smart meters on homes and wifi in school — this despite your having received 100s of studies by independent researchers and many letters from scientists and doctors to the contrary…

iphone-545772__180“Lloyd’s of London is one of the largest insurers in the world and often leads the way in protection, taking on risks that no one else will. Attached is a recent renewal policy which, as of Feb. 7, 2015, excludes any coverage associated with exposure to non-ionizing radiation….”

“‘The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.”….

“This means that the Province (that is we, the taxpayer) will be held liable for claims from teachers and parentscomputer-338968__180 of children suffering biological effects from wifi in schools, from homeowners exposed to RF from mandated smart meters on homes, and from employees forced to use cell phones or exposed to wifi at work…”

Read more:   http://www.rfsafe.com/lloyds-of-london-insurance-wont-cover-smartphones-wifi-smart-meters-cell-phone-towers-by-excluding-all-wireless-radiation-hazards/


Comment:

123
Marton’s central phone mast close to homes & offices

The fact that Lloyd’s will not insure you the user against the harmful effects of these devices speaks volumes. We already had the evidence but as I continually reiterate here, industry does not want you to know … that knowledge would clearly dissuade you from using their devices. The recent post here on the unfortunate UK man enduring the forced installation of a smart meter in his home (he’s now opted for no  power in preference) is disconcerting to say the least. Where has our right of choice as free citizens gone? Are we not purchasing power? Do we have no choice about how this is delivered?

If you’re new to the smart meter issue please educate yourself. Arm yourself with the correct information. Unfortunately you will not get this from your powerco. Listen to the professionals, watch the documentaries particularly ‘Take Back Your Power’. Then make informed decisions about how to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Listen to this Public Health Physician explain the health risks of wireless radiation:

EnvirowatchRangitikei