Category Archives: News

The GLOBAL POPULATION CRASH that lamestream is ignoring

Note: I’m taking the liberty of adding here the NZ info on population decline first, given this blog is a Kiwi one. Prof Crispin Miller has gathered together the global evidence on the population free fall happening in plain sight. He has done this with a global team of folk who daily document the instances of ‘sudden death’ and injury post covid jab … down to that taking place within various people groups and professions. What you are seeing individually (many of us now have several people we know who have suffered death or injury) is actually global. EWNZ


From Prof Mark Crispin Miller @ substack

The authors of the ongoing democide believe that it will make the world a better place for THEM. We who really want the world to be a better place must stop them, break their power, and indict them.

“ABV” stands for “anything but the ‘vaccine.’” We use it to refer to articles whose authors strain to name some other “factors” causing this unprecedented cull..

What better way to preface this apocalyptic overview than to revisit Bill Gates’ (in)famous 2010 Ted Talk, in which he proposed “our” lowering the global population by “10 or 15%,” through “vaccines, health care [sic] and reproductive health services” (i.e., lots more abortions). He cast this project as an urgent one, because “CO2 is warming the planet.”

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The segment with Gates making that “humanitarian” suggestion, as well as the whole talk, was on YouTube, which disappeared it early in the “COVID crisis.” So here’s Gates’ whole performance, still accessible on Rumble: (click on the vid image to watch at Rumble.com)

The video is also in this article, along with a full transcript:

Here’s the crucial bit:

First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.

Later, early in the COVID-19 panic, Gates, interviewed by Stephen Colbert, indiscreetly tipped his hand (and Colbert quickly urged him to use different wording, lest “the conspiracy theorists” seize on what Gates really said):

OOPS THE VIDEO HAS ALREADY BEEN ‘DISAPPEARED’

It now appears that Gates—and his towering cohorts in the eugenics movement (guided by the likes of David Rockefeller)—have got their wish; only Gates was shrewdly lying when he lowballed the number of those marked for non-existence. (The cantankerous Ted Turner, a eugenicist fanatic like Bill Gates, didn’t hesitate to come right out and say that 90% of the human race must go.) Thanks to them, and their multitudinous accessories, what we’re now living through (if we’re lucky) is a catastrophic global population crash—which will do, is now doing, vastly graver harm to all the rest of us than “overpopulation,” COVID and CO2 combined.

Brace yourself, and read the evidence; then do all you can to spread the word about this democide, and that it’s the responsibility of all who can still think to bring the authors of the most destructive crime in history, and all their accomplices, to justice.

World fertility rates in ‘unprecedented decline’, UN says

June 10, 2025

United Nations Population Fund [UNFPA] surveyed young adults and those past their reproductive years. “The world has begun an unprecedented decline in fertility rates,” says Dr Natalia Kanem, head of UNFPA. “Most people surveyed want two or more children. Fertility rates are falling in large part because many feel unable to create the families they want. And that is the real crisis,” she says. In all countries, 39% of people said financial limitations prevented them from having a child. The highest response was in Korea (58%), the lowest in Sweden (19%). In total, only 12% of people cited infertility – or difficulty conceiving – as a reason for not having the number of children they wanted to. But that figure was higher in countries including Thailand (19%), the US (16%), South Africa (15%), Nigeria (14%) and India (13%).

Link

NEW ZEALAND

ABV:

New Zealand’s fertility rate hits record low as births fall

February 19, 2025

New Zealand’s fertility rate slumped to a record low in 2023, official data shows, as the total number of births also dropped. The fertility rate tracks the average number of births women will have in their lifetime. New Zealand, along with many countries around the world, has seen this number drop as factors like education, participation in the workforce, and access to contraception contribute to women having fewer children. Statistics NZ data released on Monday found there were 1,932 fewer babies born in the year ending December 2023 than in the year before, the lowest number of registered births in 20 years. The drop was despite a 3% increase in the number of women between 15 and 49 years old, the ages at which most children are born. The combination of fewer births and more women in the population led to the fertility rate hitting a record low of 1.56 births per woman. In 2022, the rate was 1.66, and it remains far below the 2.1 needed to replace population numbers in the long term.

Link

Japan Confirms Over 600,000 Citizens Killed by Covid ‘Vaccines’

September 21, 2025

Chilling news is emerging from Japan as the nation’s leading experts have uncovered explosive evidence linking skyrocketing excess deaths to Covid mRNA “vaccines.” A grassroots coalition, United Citizens for Stopping mRNA Vaccines, has forced the release of official vaccination records for 21 million Japanese citizens through a series of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. The records include vaccination dates, batch numbers, and post-vaccine death reports. The results are devastating.

Professor Murakami of Tokyo Science University, a respected scientist, analyzed the data and uncovered a consistent, alarming pattern:

 A surge in deaths occurred 90–120 days after injection.

 Those who received multiple doses saw earlier and steeper death spikes, suggesting cumulative toxicity.

 Murakami estimates that 600,000–610,000 Japanese citizens have been killed by the “vaccines.”

This figure is eerily consistent with Japan’s excess death statistics. Because these deaths typically happen months after the jab, doctors rarely connect them to the shots, allowing health officials to hide the carnage in plain sight.

Link

Covid ‘Vaccines’ Triggered Global Turbo Cancer Crisis

September 24, 2025

Devastating alarm bells are emerging from Russia as the nation’s leading experts warn that chilling new evidence proves that the global turbo cancer crisis was caused by Covid mRNA “vaccines.” An alarming new review has confirmed the link between mass mRNA “vaccination” and skyrocketing cancer cases and deaths recorded around the world. The study was led by renowned Russian researcher Angelina Alekseevna Seliverstova and Dr. Oleg Germanovich Makeev, Professor of Biology and Biotechnology at Ural State Medical University in Yekaterinburg. Their findings confirm that the worldwide rollout of Covid mRNA shots triggered unexpected long-term safety risks. Most damning of all, the study exposes how Western institutions have downplayed, censored, or outright concealed these risks. The authors accuse global health officials of keeping the public in the dark about what could be the most devastating medical cover-up in modern history.

Unlike many Western studies, this review declared no financial conflicts of interest, no outside funding, and no pharmaceutical ties, underscoring the independence of its conclusions. The warning from Russia is clear, as the world is now grappling with a medical ticking time bomb unleashed by the mRNA experiment. Meanwhile, the establishment is doing everything it can to silence the truth.

The evidence is mounting and shows that mass mRNA “vaccination” has not only failed to stop Covid but may be fueling an ongoing surge in cancer, chronic illness, and unexplained deaths. The warnings from Russian and Western scientists now converge on a single reality, revealing that humanity has been subjected to a reckless experiment with catastrophic consequences. Yet, the cover-up may be as dangerous as the injections themselves.

Link

UNITED STATES

US population decline sooner than expected as deaths to outpace births in America by 2031

September 19, 2025

The US population is approaching a critical demographic milestone as deaths are now projected to exceed births as early as 2031, two years earlier than previously expected. This shift signals a trend toward near-zero population growth, raising concerns about the country’s economic future and social support systems. In conclusion, the convergence of lower birth rates and aggressive immigration enforcement signals a turning point in U.S. demographic dynamics. Policymakers face the urgent task of addressing this population slowdown’s economic repercussions while balancing immigration regulations and social welfare needs.

Link

Puerto Rico ranks among world’s fastest-shrinking populations

April 21, 2025

Puerto Rico is the fourth jurisdiction with the highest population decline in the world, according to recent statistics showing the island’s population shrank by 1.2% in 2024 compared to the previous year. The Cook Islands in the South Pacific, American Samoa, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon experienced greater population declines — at 2.24%, 1.54% and 1.21% respectively — Statista reported. Of the 20 countries with the highest rate of population decline, the majority are island nations, where emigration rates are high, particularly to Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. mainland, or they are in Eastern Europe, which suffers from a combination of high emigration and low birth rates, according to Statista. Puerto Rico’s population is forecast to decline steadily between 2024 and 2029, dropping by 100,000 people, or 3.13%, to little more than 3.1 million in 2029 — reaching its lowest level since 1977. The island’s population peaked at 3,827,000 in 2004, according to World Bank and U.S. Census Bureau data.

Link

CANADA

ABV:

Canada’s population growth slows to historic lows as temporary residents decline

September 25, 2025

Canada’s population stood at an estimated 41.65 million on July 1, 2025, rising by just 47,098 people, or 0.1%, over the previous quarter. According to Statistics Canada, this is the lowest second-quarter growth rate since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when border closures nearly halted migration. Excluding that year, it is the slowest pace for a second quarter since comparable records began in 1946. From July 2024 to July 2025, Canada’s population expanded by 389,324 people (+0.9%), sharply lower than the 1.21 million (+3.0%) added a year earlier. Much of the slowdown came after the federal government introduced policies in 2024 to reduce temporary migration.

MEXICO

ABV:

Birth rate in Mexico declines, mirroring a global phenomenon

October 2, 2024

Mexico’s birth rate fell to a three-year low in 2023, with 1.8 million births recorded, marking a significant decline in fertility, according to a report by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography. This decline will have important implications for the country’s labor market, healthcare, and economic growth, signaling an urgent need for policy adjustment to address the evolving demographic landscape. Several interconnected factors have contributed to the decline in birth rates, including rising living costs and economic pressures, as reported by Al Jazeera.

CUBA

ABV:

Cuba gets older: The island reports its lowest birth rate since the Revolution

March 10, 2025

A group of Cuban officials has confirmed what has been obvious on the streets of Cuba for some time: that the country has much fewer people than it did three years ago. Fewer births are being registered and only older adults are increasing as a demographic group. The latest official figures from the National Statistics and Information Office (ONEI) show that the latest exodus of Cubans has emptied the country out; that women are reluctant to have children in the midst of an endless economic crisis, and that young people are leaving while the elderly remain behind. Authorities have said that this population aging should not be “dramatized,” but researchers insist that it should not be underestimated either. In any case, they say that the problem is not aging per se, but the conditions in which Cubans are getting older.

Link

BRAZIL

ABV:

Latin America’s Fertility Decline is Accelerating. No One’s Certain Why

January 5, 2024

Among demographers, 2023 will be remembered as the year Brazil “shrank” by almost 5 million people. A new census put the country’s population at 203 million people—well below the 208 million previously estimated by Brazil’s national statistics institute, and even further from the 216 million calculated by the United Nations. Those missing people didn’t vanish or emigrate—they were never born. The 2022 census, delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic, showed that Brazil’s population grew during the 2010s by just 0.52% per year—half the rate seen throughout the 2000s, and the lowest such percentage since 1872. Brazil is not alone. For half a century, fertility rates around the world have been drifting downwards thanks to a confluence of rising education levels, greater labor force participation by women, strengthened reproductive rights, and wider access to contraception. But in several Latin American and Caribbean countries, this decline has recently accelerated to an unexpected degree that even experts are struggling to explain.

UNITED KINGDOM

ABV:

Fertility rate hits record low in England, Scotland and Wales

August 27, 2025

The fertility rate for England and Wales has fallen for the third year in a row to reach a record low, figures show. The total fertility rate across both countries, meaning the average number of live children women can expect to have across their child-bearing life, stood at 1.41 in 2024, down from 1.42 in 2023, the lowest since comparable data was first collected in 1938, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This is despite a 0.6% increase in live births last year, with a 14% increase in the number of babies born to fathers over 60, according to figures published last month. Bernice Kuang, a demography researcher at the University of Southampton, said the fall in fertility rates could be a temporary result of people postponing having children.

Link

FRANCE

ABV:

Birth rate in France: The decline under the microscope

July 10, 2025

The birth rate in France is declining, and the trend has been observed under the microscope by the Académie Nationale de Médecine and INED (French institute for demographic studies), which have each recently published a report on the subject. The decline recorded can be analysed through different factors. The total number of births has been steadily falling since 2010 in mainland France. At that date, the number of births was 832,000. In 2024, a historic low was recorded with 663,000 babies. To understand these figures, the post-war record was achieved in 1971 with 916,000 births. These raw figures should also be compared with the size of the population. Indeed, the size of the population bears an obvious link with the total number of births. The INSEE (National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies) defines the birth rate as the number of births during the year relative to the total mean population for the year. The rate has been falling almost constantly for several decades. from 14.8 in 1982, it has dropped to 9.9 in 2023. Many analyses have been put forward in order to understand the phenomenon. Among the explanatory factors, the social and professional status of women is important. Women are undertaking longer studies, and a much higher proportion of women have a salaried income.

Link

BELGIUM

After decades of growth, Brussels’ population is set to decline

June 20, 2025

The Brussels region is expected to see a slight population decline to just under 1.25 million by 2034 after two decades of steady growth, the Brussels Institute for Statistics and Analysis said in a new report. Between 2004 and 2024, the region’s population grew from 1 million to 1.25 million, with international migration being one of the main drivers. Non-Belgians accounted for 37.2% the population data from last year shows – the French are topping the list, followed by Romanians and Italians. But the next decade isn’t expected to see any further growth, as residents are leaving for other parts of the country and birth rates are declining. By 2034, the numbers are expected to drop to just under 1.25 million, the Brussels Institute for Statistics and Analysis (BISA) estimates in a new report. The municipalities of Brussels are projected to lose 2,400 inhabitants between 2024 and 2034.

Link

GERMANY

Germany updates: Population growth on the decline

June 20, 2025

In 2024 Germany‘s population rose by 0.1% which is a drop from the 0.4% growth witnessed the year before, according to preliminary figures released by the Federal Statistical Office on Friday. As a result, the population for the EU’s largest economy now stands at 83.6 million. The figures showed that, as in previous years, more people died than were born in Germany, but the population growth came about due to immigration. Population growth concentrated in Germany’s western states, which saw an increase of 0.2%, while the eastern states, excluding the city-state of Berlin, recorded a decline of 0.3%. The largest increase for a state came in Bavaria, with population numbers up by 73,000. The biggest population losses occurred in the eastern states of Thuringia (down 15,000 or 0.7%), Saxony (down 12,000 or 0.3%), and Saxony-Anhalt (down 9,000 or 0.4%).

Link

MOLDOVA

ABV:

A disappearing country. Moldova on the verge of a demographic catastrophe

August 1. 2025

Moldova is one of the fastest depopulating countries in the world. Since it gained independence in 1991, the population of its right-bank region (the territory controlled by Chișinău, excluding the separatist region of Transnistria) has shrunk by approximately 35%. This is primarily due to mass labour migration driven by economic conditions, involving over one million citizens of a country with a current population of 2.4 million. Other significant factors contributing to Moldova’s declining population include a dramatic drop in fertility rates and high mortality associated with low life expectancy, which is ten years below the EU average. Consequently, Moldovan society is ageing rapidly; in 1991, the average age of a resident was 29, compared to 38 at present.

Link

CROATIA

ABV:

Can Croatia stop the population decline?

March 4 2025

Croatia is facing a serious depopulation crisis, with many young people leaving in search of better opportunities. In an effort to reverse this trend, the government has pledged €700 million in 2024 to support returning Croatians, tax relief, and affordable housing. But will these measures be enough to keep people in the country? Experts warn that financial incentives alone won’t solve the problemHRT writes. The biggest challenge for young families remains securing a place to live. Croatia is implementing projects aimed at reducing the cost of housing construction, yet it still ranks among the most expensive EU countries in terms of property prices.

Link

SERBIA

ABV:

No one left to live, let alone work: Serbia faces a major demographic crisis

June 23, 2025

The saying “The further south you go, the sadder it gets” perfectly applies to the story of demographic changes in certain parts of Serbia, which are now heavily influencing the labour market. In essence, in some regions, depopulation has reached alarming levels, threatening not only to reshape the local economy but also to alter the structure and even the nationality of the workforce. While this may sound overly pessimistic, data from both national and international institutions indicate that the country and its leadership face serious demographic challenges. If left unchecked, these challenges could significantly reshape the economy – not only in southern and eastern Serbia, where the problem is most pronounced – but in the entire country. The bleak reality is underscored by World Bank data, which ranks Serbia 13th globally for the fastest population decline. Jakup Berisha, UNDP’s Resident Representative in Serbia, also reminds us of this status. “The census shows that Serbia has 6.65 million inhabitants, 496,000 fewer than in 2011. Due to a low birth rate, an ageing workforce, and emigration, the number of young people entering the labour market is decreasing, while the number of pensioners is rising faster than we can replace outgoing workers. At the same time, emigration disproportionately draws away highly educated professionals, further worsening labour shortages in key industries,” Berisha told NIN.

Link

BULGARIA

ABV:

Bulgaria Among EU’s Most Declining Populations as Demographic Shifts Intensify

August 7, 2025

Over the past two decades, Bulgarians rank among the top three populations in the European Union that have experienced significant decline. Across the EU, the share of children in the population has fallen, marriages are increasingly rare, and one in four newborns last year had a mother from an immigrant background. The latest European statistics shed light on these demographic trends. Eurostat data shows the EU population grew by 4% over 20 years, concentrated mainly in five countries: Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Poland, which together account for nearly 70% of the total. Smaller populations include Malta, with around half a million inhabitants. Bulgaria’s population stands at approximately 6.4 million, placing it 15th in size among EU member states. Within this timeframe, 19 countries saw population growth while 8 experienced decline. Luxembourg’s population doubled, followed by Malta and Ireland, which increased by about one-third. Bulgaria saw a notable 17% reduction, equivalent to a loss of roughly 1.3 million people, second only to Latvia’s 18% decrease. Immigration remains a significant factor shaping the EU’s demographic landscape.

Link

GREECE

ABV:

Greece announces €1.6bn relief package to tackle population decline

September 7, 2025

Greece has announced drastic measures, including tax breaks and other financial incentives, to address a population decline that is on course to make it the oldest nation in EuropeThe prime minister said the €1.6bn (£1.4bn) relief package had been dictated by one of the biggest challenges facing the Mediterranean nation: a demographic crisis of unprecedented scale. Greece’s near decade-long crisis has been widely blamed for the alarming drop. This is partly because younger people were among those hardest hit by austerity measures required in return for international rescue funds that kept bankruptcy at bay and debt-stricken Athens in the EU.

Link

ABV:

Low Birth Rates, Brain Drain, and Living Conditions Drive Greece’s Population Down by Half a Million

August 23. 2025

The latest report by the Laboratory of Demographic and Social Analyses of the University of Thessaly paints a grim picture of the current state and future demographic outlook of Greece, as the country’s population continues to age disproportionately and decline sharply. Data shows that the total population of Greece has declined by half a million over the last thirteen years, while the birth-death ratio is projected to remain negative until at least 2050, pointing towards a shift in the migratory flows balance as the most imminent solution to the problem. According to the report, the reasons for this significant decline in population are not only related to demography but more generally to the social challenges that Greece has faced in recent decades and the worsening living conditions for both native Greeks and migrants.

Link

POLAND

Poland records EU’s largest population decline for second year running

July 15, 2025

Poland’s population fell by over 123,000 in 2024, the largest overall decline among all European Union member states for the second year in a row. In relative terms – taking account of the size of countries’ population – Poland had the EU’s joint-third-largest drop of 0.34%. The data for 2024 mark the sixth consecutive year that Poland’s population declined amid a demographic crisis that the country’s statistical agency has forecast will continue in the coming decades. Last year saw the number of births in Poland fall to a new postwar low. It was the 12th year in a row in which deaths have outnumbered births. Poland’s fertility rate – the average number of children that are born to a woman over her lifetime – also fell to a new record low of 1.099, which is among the lowest in the world.

Link

CZECH REPUBLIC

Population Decline in the Czech Republic: 27,000 Fewer Residents in the First Half of 2025

September 11, 2025

The population of the Czech Republic decreased in the first half of 2025. By the end of June, 10.88 million people were living in the country, 27,200 fewer than at the start of the year. This is due to both the negative birth-to-death balance and emigration abroad. According to data from the Czech Statistical Office (ČSÚ), 57,700 people died in the first six months – almost 2,000 more than in the same period last year. In contrast, only 37,400 children were born, a decrease of around 12 per cent compared with the first half of 2024. Nearly half of all births occurred outside marriage, and most children were born to women aged 30 to 32.

Link

ALBANIA

ABV:

Albania, with the strongest population decline in Europe in the last decade

July 14, 2025

Throughout Europe, especially in developing countries, people are moving in search of a better life. Globalization, the opening of markets, the easing of movement and work permit criteria by aging developed countries are opportunities that, naturally, many will try to take advantage of, especially young people who today have higher expectations from life. But no one is leaving at the rate that Albanians are leaving. The latest Eurostat data, processed by “Monitor”, show that Albania’s population has been reduced by 18.2% at the end of 2024, compared to 2011, a period that includes the development of two censuses. In Albania, the strong population contraction is related to two factors. First, the slowdown in natural increase, which turned negative during the pandemic and is now at minimal levels, with only 1.2 thousand people plus in 2024, from over 60 thousand people in the early 90s. The second and most important factor is emigration, which saw a new wave after 2016, mainly from the young population. In 2024, according to Eurostat, net emigration was 28.8 thousand people.

Link

PORTUGAL

In six, months, 102 new cases of childhood cancer were reported in Ceara

September 23, 2025

The data are from the Albert Sabin Children’s Hosptial and refer to the number of visits performed in the state public health system in the first six months of 2025. [paywall]

Link

Portugal grapples with accelerating demographic decline

August 28, 2025

Portugal is confronting a deepening demographic crisis, as recent data from the National Statistics Institute (INE) highlights a marked decline in its younger population and a significant increase in the elderly. The Portugal News reports that in 2023 only 12.8 percent of the Portuguese population was aged between 0 and 14, positioning the country as the third in the European Union with the lowest proportion of young people, surpassed only by Italy and Malta. This trend is attributed by the INE to decades of consistently low birth rates combined with a rise in life expectancy. Analysis reveals that between 1970 and 2024, the proportion of young people in Portugal decreased from 28.5 to 12.6 percent. The INE projects that if current demographic patterns persist, Portugal’s resident population will decline to approximately 8.2 million by 2080. This forecast further accentuates the urgency for policy interventions designed to stimulate birth rates and facilitate the integration of young people and migrants into the labour market.

Link

ITALY

Italy’s demographic crisis worsens as births hit record low

March 31, 2025

Italy’s demographic crisis deepened in 2024 as the number of births hit a new record low, emigration accelerated and the population continued to shrink, national statistics bureau ISTAT said on Monday. Italy’s ever-falling birth rate is considered a national emergency, but despite Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and her predecessors pledging to make it a priority, none have so far been able to halt the drop. There were some 281,000 more deaths than births in 2024 and the population fell by 37,000 to 58.93 million, continuing a decade-long trend. Since 2014, Italy’s population has shrunk by almost 1.9 million, more than the inhabitants of Milan, its second-largest city, or of the region of Calabria in the country’s southern toe. The 370,000 babies born in 2024 marked the 16th consecutive annual decline and was the lowest figure since the country’s unification in 1861. It was down 2.6% from 2023, ISTAT said, and 35.8% lower than in 2008 – the last year Italy saw an increase in the number of babies born. The fertility rate, measuring the average number of children born to each woman of child-bearing age, also fell to a record low of 1.18, far below the 2.1 needed for a steady population.

Link

Unprecedented Crisis in Italy, Population Decreasing to 54,8 Million by 2050

April 1, 2025

Italy is facing an unprecedented demographic crisis that will have profound economic and social repercussions in the coming decades. According to data presented by the president of Istat, Francesco Maria Chelli, during the hearing at the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry on the effects of the demographic transition, the Italian population continues to decline, reaching 58,9 million inhabitants in 2025, with a decrease of 37 thousand people compared to the previous year. The forecasts for the future are even more worrying: by 2050 the population will drop to 54,8 million, with a loss of over 4 million inhabitants compared to current levels.

Link

TURKEY

ABV:

Turkey sounds alarm over declining birth rates amid economic concerns

May 27, 2025

Turkey’s birth rate has plunged to its lowest level in modern history, prompting warnings from officials and experts, who say the country is facing a demographic crossroads. Recent data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK) show that the total fertility rate in 2024 fell to 1.48 children per woman, well below the population replacement level of 2.1 and a steep decline from 2.38 in 2001. The number of live births in 2024 stood at 937,559, with boys accounting for 51.4 percent and girls for 48.6 percent. This marks a continuation of a trend that demographers and economists say is increasingly linked to economic hardship in Turkey, particularly among young adults of childbearing age.

Link

IRAN

Iran’s Seemingly Unstoppable Birth Slump

May 21, 2025

Despite exhortations from ruling clerisy to be fruitful, and pro-natal policies intended to prop up birth rates, fertility in Iran is slumping once again. Earlier this month, the Tehran Times reported that annual births in Iran fell below the million mark. According to the Civil Registration Organization in charge of Iran’s vital statistics, just under 980,000 births were recorded between the Iranian calendar year coinciding with 21 March 2024 through 20 March 2025. It has been a very long time since so few babies were born in Iran. By the reckoning of the United Nations Population Division, we have to go back seventy years—to 1955—to find a time when Iranian annual birth totals were lower than today. The current birth level, as we see in Figure 1, is less than half as high as it was forty years ago, in 1985.

Link

SAUDI ARABIA

Grim warning: Writer warns of declining population in Saudi Arabia

February 8, 2025

A Saudi writer has raised alarms about the country’s declining birth rates, warning that Saudis could face extinction. In an article published in the Saudi newspaper Al Watan, Mansour Al Daban referenced UN data that shows a worrying drop in Saudi birth rates. The figures indicate that births in Saudi Arabia fell by 67 per cent in 2023 compared to 1950, when the birth rate was 53.34 per 1,000 people. By 2023, the rate had plummeted to 15.7, marking a 2.88 per cent decline from the previous year. Al Daban also cited a study titled Epidemiological Decline in Human Fertility Rate in the Arab World, conducted by researchers from the University of Sharjah in the UAE. The study, which analysed fertility rates in the Arab world from 2011 to 2021, found a similar decline in most Arab countries.

Link

RUSSIA

Russia’s Birth Rate Plunges to 200-Year Low

April 14, 2025

Russia’s attempts to boost its flagging birth rate — through policies promoting “traditional values,” tighter abortion restrictions and officials’ encouragement of larger families — appear to be falling short, as the number of births has fallen to its lowest level in centuries. According to data released by the state statistics agency Rosstat, 195,400 children were born in Russia during January and February 2025 — a 3% drop compared to the same period in 2024. The decline was even steeper in February alone, with births falling 7.6% year-over-year to 90,500 — 7,400 fewer than in the same month last year. Some regions saw even sharper drops. Births fell by 18.7% in Arkhangelsk, 19.4% in the republic of Karelia, 18.6% in the Oryol region, 21.6% in Kostroma and 26.6% in Smolensk. According to demographer Alexei Raksha, the first quarter of 2025 likely saw the lowest number of births since the early 1800s, with February marking the lowest monthly figure in over 200 years. Based on preliminary registry office data, he estimated that 95,000 to 96,000 children were born in March, bringing the total for the first quarter to around 293,000-294,000.

Link

Edward Slavsquat

Russia stops publishing demographic data

Russia’s Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has stopped publishing data that it collects on the country’s demographic situation…

Read more

3 months ago · 133 likes · 80 comments · Edward Slavsquat

INDIA

India Shuts Down Schools Over Birth Rate Decline

June 18, 2025

Some parts of India have been forced to shut down schools amid the country’s declining birth rates. Economist Sanjeev Sanyal, who was previously the principal economic adviser in India’s finance ministry and a member of the Economic Advisory Council to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has spoken about this happening and called for it to occur “more routinely.” “Our population is only growing now because we are living longerwe are not having enough babies,” he told the Indian financial newspaper Mint on Monday. “So our problem is already the case that in parts of the country we have to shut down schools.” “We should be shutting them down,” he added. “We are doing them slowly. But we need to do them more routinely. Because whenever I mention that we need to shut down schools, people get very emotional about this issue.”

Link

THAILAND

ABV:

Rethinking Thailand’s Population Crisis through the Lens of a “Reluctant Economist”

September 23, 2025

Many of us are already aware of Thailand’s growing demographic crisis. The country is now experiencing “more deaths than births,” and the Thai population is steadily shrinking. Within approximately 50 years, the population is projected to drop by half—from over 60 million to just over 30 million. The country will be filled with elderly citizens. Working-age individuals will become rare, and the number of children and youth will decline dramatically. All of this stems from one key issue: Thai people are having fewer children. This is undeniably a major issue that many sectors are trying to address with the best possible solutions. In our article, “Integrated National Strategic Plan: Turning Thailand’s Population Crisis into Future Opportunities,” we presented macro-level strategies for dealing with this issue. However, in this article, we want to invite everyone to “rethink” the problem through the perspective of the “Reluctant Economist”—a concept developed by Professor Richard A. Easterlin. This lens, which is rarely seen (or perhaps never seen) in Thai discourse, may help us better understand the root cause of the population crisis—and possibly lead us to better solutions. Thailand’s declining birth rate poses the core of the population crisis. From the perspective of the Reluctant Economist, the central question is, why are people choosing to have fewer children? [Hint – It’s not lower fertility.]

Link

VIETNAM

Why Vietnam’s Demographic Decline Will Reinforce Its Non-Aligned Foreign Policy

August 26, 2025

Demographic decline is causing multiple headaches for Vietnamese policymakers. According to the latest statistics, Vietnam’s births per woman in 2024 declined to 1.91 from 1.96 in 2023, which is slightly below the replacement rate of 2.1. Vietnam’s population is aging rapidly. The number of people over the age of 60 increased from 11.4 million in 2019 to 14.2 million in 2024 out of a population of approximately 100 million. This cohort is projected to reach 18 million in 2030. An aging population and a declining workforce will put pressure on Vietnam’s nascent welfare system and its ambitious growth target of becoming a high-income country by the 2040s. The Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) is encouraging births by handing out a one-time cash payment to women having two newborns before the age of 35 and not punishing party members who have a third child. This year, Vietnam also ended its two-child policy and allowed families to decide for themselves how many children they can have.

Link

CHINA

Chinese kindergartens in crisis as enrolments plunge 25% in 4 years

July 26, 2025

China has recorded three consecutive years of population decline to 2024

The number of Chinese kindergartens has fallen by a quarter in four years, prompting the closure of tens of thousands of schools in the country as a precipitous drop in births hits the education system. Enrolments in China’s kindergartens have declined by 12mn children between 2020 and 2024, from a peak of 48mn, according to data from the country’s ministry of education. The number of kindergartens, serving Chinese children aged 3-5, has also fallen by 41,500 from a high of nearly 295,000 in 2021. Falling enrolments are now “baked into the system and that’s not going to change”, said Stuart Gietel-Basten, director of the Center for Aging Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He added that compared with five or 10 years ago, the decline in births was “huge”. The contraction of China’s pre-school system is a foretaste of the challenges to come for business and policymakers from China’s demographic decline, which is expected to be one of the most rapid in the world. China has recorded three consecutive years of population decline to 2024 following the decades-long policy, ended in 2016, that limited many couples to one child. While the number of births rose by about 520,000 last year to 9.3mn, following a record low in 2023, they were still outpaced by deaths and have declined by nearly half since the peak of 17.9mn in 2017.

Link

ABV:

China to offer $500 per child in move to boost birth rate

July 28, 2025

The Chinese government will offer parents subsidies of 3,600 yuan ($500, €429) per child under the age of three per year, Beijing’s state media said Monday. China‘s population has declined for three consecutive years, the world’s second most populous nation — after India — is facing an emerging demographic crisisThe number of births in 2024 — 9.54 million — was half as many as in 2016, the year that ended its one-child policy that was in place for more than three decades. Marriage rates in China have also hit a record low. Young couples put off having babies due to the high cost of raising children and career concerns.

Link

ABV:

China’s population falls for a third consecutive year

January 17, 2025

China’s population fell for a third consecutive year in 2024, with the number of deaths outpacing a slight increase in births, and experts cautioning that the trend will accelerate in the coming years. The National Bureau of Statistics said the total number of people in China dropped by 1.39 million to 1.408 billion in 2024, compared to 1.409 billion in 2023. Friday’s data reinforces concerns that the world’s second largest economy will struggle as the number of workers and consumers declines. Rising costs from elderly care and retirement benefits are also likely to create additional strains for already indebted local governments. The high cost of childcare and education as well as job uncertainty and a slowing economy have also discouraged many young Chinese from getting married and starting a family. Gender discrimination and traditional expectations for women to take care of the home exacerbate the issue, demographers say.

Link

TAIWAN

Taiwan sees 18th consecutive month of population decline

July 10, 2025

Taiwan’s population declined for the 18th consecutive month as of the end of June, according to data released Thursday by the Ministry of the Interior (MOI). In total, 55,375 babies were born in the first half of 2025, down 8,499 from the same period last year, when 63,874 births were recorded. Meanwhile, 16,554 deaths were reported in June, equivalent to approximately one death every 2.6 minutes. That figure represents an increase of 1,172 from May and 1,632 more than in June 2024. The crude death rate for the month stood at 8.63 per 1,000 people. The natural population decrease – the difference between births and deaths – was 7,586 for June.

Link

SOUTH KOREA

ABV:

New South Korea Data Reveals Scale of Population Decline

September 5, 2025

Marriages in South Korea have dropped by nearly half over the past three decades, while annual births have fallen to just one-third of 1995 levels, according to newly released data. The numbers show what officials consider a looming population crisisSouth Korea‘s fertility rate—the lowest in the world—stood at 0.75 births per woman in 2024, well below the 2.1 needed to sustain a population. The same year, the share of South Koreans aged 65 and older passed 20 percent. The demographic shift could drag on the country’s economic prospects and strain its pension and health care systems, with fewer young workers supporting a growing elderly population. Analysts have cited high housing costs, an unforgiving workplace culture and unequal burdens of child care as key reasons young South Koreans are deciding to delay or forgo children.

Link

South Korea’s Military Personnel Plummet 31% as Male 20s Drop 16%

September 23, 2025

This year, the male population in their 20s stood at approximately 3,024,000, a 15.8% decrease compared to the male population in their 20s in 2010, 15 years ago. Meanwhile, South Korea’s military personnel, which numbered 650,000 (based on the Defense White Paper) in 2010, plummeted to 450,000 over 15 years, a 30.7% drop. The reduction in military personnel has outpaced the natural decline in the population eligible for service. Analysis suggests that populist policies aimed at shortening military service periods to appeal to younger voters have accelerated the military’s crisis more rapidly than the decline in conscription resources due to low birth rates.

Link

THE PHILIPPINES

Philippine population growth slowing down

July 17, 2025

The Philippines’ annual population growth rate (PGR) is declining, according to data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA). President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has officially declared the country’s latest population count at 112,729,484, based on recent data. This marks an increase of 3.69 million people since the last nationwide census in 2020, when the population stood at 109.03 million.

A table showing the increase in the Philippines’ population since 1960

The population and the population growth rate (PGR) are two different things. The population refers to the total number of people, while the PGR measures the rate at which that number increases over time. Despite an increase in the overall population size, the PGR has declined, from 1.63% between 2015 and 2020, to 0.80% between 2020 and 2024. The country’s PGR has been generally declining since 1960 to 1970, when it was recorded at 3.01%.

A table showing the decline in the Philippines’ population growth rate since 1960

“The slowdown in the growth rate may be driven by several interrelated factors such as but not limited to declining fertility and birth rate, elevated mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, and subdued migration activity,” the PSA said.

Link

AUSTRALIA

ABV:

Australia’s birth rate hits rock bottom with severe consequences for economic future

October 16, 2024

There are warnings that Australia’s birth rate — having hit a record low — is now at a critical level. Bureau of Statistics figures show 286,998 births were registered in Australia in 2023, resulting in a total fertility rate of 1.50 babies per woman. Australian National University demographer Liz Allen said the nation’s birth rate is perilously low. “We’ve hit rock bottom,” she said. The Total Fertility Rate, or TFR, over the past 30 years has slowly dropped from 1.86 in 1993 to 1.5 in 2023. The birth rate for girls and women aged 15 to 19 has fallen by more than two thirds over that period. There’s also been a large decline for women aged 20 to 24 years. She described a “deep-seated attitudinal problem” facing millions of younger Australians. Many, the demographer said, lack enthusiasm about the future, and that relates to their views on climate change, housing affordability and gender equality.

Link

THE NEXT MEDICAL SHOCK: DOCTORS FALLING, AI RISING

Nearly every physician took the experimental shots. Now, he says, many are paying the price in silence. “They’re coming to me quietly,” … “They don’t want anyone to know they’ve been vaccine-injured.”

Note: We ought not to think that this will be confined to the US. The plan was and still is global. The writing is on the wall here in NZ. The state of our ‘health’ system reflects this. I know and you probably know of horror stories emerging from visits to the ED in the night. Of the horrific post safe & effective injuries treated with large helpings of pharma’s products. As Makis points out AI will take the Doctors’ places. Recent discussions with professionals in other arenas tell me that AI is replacing actors and musicians also. Makes sense now doesn’t it? How were we to do without them, given they are passing on in droves? If you doubt this sub to Prof Mark Crispin Miller’s substack. He has teams of folk world wide who are compiling lists of sudden deaths post-safe & effective roll out. Read the post below. EWNZ


From Jim Ferguson @ X aka Twitter
via The Hatchard Report

Dr. William Makis just issued one of the most chilling warnings yet — a quiet crisis unfolding inside the medical profession itself.

According to Makis, thousands of doctors are now falling ill — heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and a terrifying surge in what he calls “turbo cancers.”

Nearly every physician took the experimental shots. Now, he says, many are paying the price in silence. “They’re coming to me quietly,” Makis reveals. “They don’t want anyone to know they’ve been vaccine-injured.”

Behind closed doors, once-proud physicians are seeking help — desperate for treatments like ivermectin and fenbendazole, while their own profession refuses to acknowledge what’s happening. The result? Doctors are retiring in their 40s. Practices are closing. The healthcare system is hollowing out from within. And what comes next, Makis warns, is even darker: AI will fill the void. “The doctors will drop out… and AI will take their place.”

SOURCE

Image by Julio César Velásquez Mejía from Pixabay

Studies show that paraquat is linked to Parkinson’s disease and a host of other serious side effects

From Wisner Baum

Pursuing Justice on Behalf of Our Clients for Nearly 40 Years

Founded in Los Angeles, California in 1985, the law firm of Wisner Baum has earned a reputation for breaking new legal ground, holding major corporations accountable, influencing public policy, and raising public awareness about important safety issues. Our trial experience across a broad range of practice areas includes over $4 billion in verdicts and settlements.

READ MORE

What is Paraquat?

Paraquat dichloride is a non-selective, broad-spectrum herbicide used primarily to kill weeds and grass. Austrian chemist Hugo Weidel and his student, M. Russo, discovered paraquat in the 1880s. Roughly 50 years later, scientists Michaelis and Hill discovered the chemical’s redox properties and named the compound methyl viologen. Scientists discovered the chemical’s weed-killing properties in the late 1950s.

Commercially introduced in 1962 as Gramoxone, paraquat quickly became a top-selling herbicide despite numerous studies linking the herbicide to wide-ranging health issues. The rise in paraquat use coincided with the surge in no-till farming in the U.S. and worldwide.

Common Paraquat Products

Syngenta and Chevron are two of the largest paraquat producers. Some of the most common paraquat products include:

  • Blanco
  • Bonedry
  • Cyclone SL 2.0
  • Devour
  • Firestorm
  • Gramoxone
  • Helmquat 3SL
  • Para-Shot 3.0
  • Paraquate Concentrate

Common Paraquat Side Effects

Research shows that paraquat exposure is dangerous, even at low levels. Paraquat side effects depend on the amount, route, and duration of exposure to the herbicide and the person’s overall health. The herbicide enters the body via:

  • Skin: Contact or penetration of the skin, mucous membranes, and other epithelial tissues (including the mouth, nose, trachea, and conducting airways, particularly where cuts, abrasions, rashes, sores, or other tissue damage are present).
  • Inhalation: Spray droplets enter the nose or mouth.
  • Ingestion: The liquid chemical is swallowed.

Acute Exposure – Paraquat Poisoning

According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “one small sip [of paraquat] can be fatal, and there is no antidote.” In general, people who accidentally or intentionally ingest paraquat may experience any of the following symptoms:

  • Acute kidney failure
  • Coma
  • Confusion
  • Heart issues
  • Liver failure
  • Lung scarring
  • Muscle weakness
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Respiratory failure possibly leads to death
  • Seizures

While these cases are rare, paraquat poisoning may also occur via skin contact or inhalation. This report out of China highlights the potential for paraquat poisoning via skin absorption, and this report highlights the potential for paraquat poisoning via inhalation.

Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Link

The body of scientific research linking paraquat and Parkinson’s disease (often referred to simply as “PD”) has continued to grow in recent years. Several studies have concluded that exposure to paraquat increases the likelihood of developing Parkinson’s disease and that the effect is dose-dependent. The research suggests that farmworkers and pesticide applicators are more at risk of developing Parkinson’s disease. People who live near fields and other areas where paraquat is heavily used may also be more at risk for PD.

READ MORE AT THE SOURCE

Other News Updates

Here is a catch up summary of various topics too numerous to publish individually:

Injustice: Swedish Court Will Not Deport Refugee Who Raped A Minor Because ‘It Did Not Last Long Enough’

The Dr Ardis Show: Cataracts: What Your Doctor Won’t Tell You (Part 1)

 To scan your face, that is the question: Where do draw the line when it comes to stopping Digital ID?

Is the Depopulation Plan Real?: YES and Let’s Not Mince Words: IT IS A GLOBAL GENOCIDE AGENDA

How to Stay Out of the Digital ID Trap

Coming Real Estate Crash

USDA Declares Bird Flu A Permanent Emergency After Sudden Resurgence, Will Provide Continued Funding Amidst Government Shutdown To Provide Vaccines And Other Treatments

Time to Discuss Alzheimer’s Disease: Aluminium is no longer the elephant in the room

CDC study shows there is no scientific rationale for vaccine mandates for kids attending school

A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind

From Unbekoming @ substack

Most people go through their entire lives never questioning where money comes from. They assume governments create it, that banks merely store and lend it, and that economic crises are natural phenomena like weather patterns. Stephen Mitford Goodson’s “A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind” demolishes these assumptions with documented evidence spanning three millennia: for over three centuries, private banks have created 97% of the world’s money supply from nothing, as interest-bearing debt. Banks don’t lend existing money – they create new money by typing numbers into computers, then charge compound interest on this fiction while seizing real assets when the mathematically impossible debts can’t be repaid.

Goodson’s authority comes from his position as a former Director of the South African Reserve Bank who witnessed firsthand how central banks operate. Unlike academic economists who theorize from ivory towers or journalists who speculate from outside, Goodson sat in the boardroom where monetary policy gets made. He saw the mechanisms of control, understood the deliberate creation of booms and busts, and recognized the same patterns of manipulation he would later trace through Roman copper coins, medieval tally sticks, colonial scrip, and modern electronic transfers. His sudden death in 2018, like so many monetary reformers before him, fits a familiar pattern.

The historical evidence reveals consistent outcomes: whenever governments issue their own money debt-free, civilizations flourish with full employment, stable prices, and cultural achievement. Medieval England’s workers labored just fourteen weeks yearly when tally sticks served as money. Tsarist Russia grew 10% annually with the world’s lowest taxes under state banking. Hitler’s Germany eliminated unemployment while doubling GDP in six years using state-issued currency. Modern North Dakota maintains budget surpluses while every other American state drowns in debt. Every one of these successful systems was destroyed through war, revolution, or assassination. The French Revolution, the American Civil War, both World Wars, the Bolshevik Revolution, the recent destruction of Libya – all were fundamentally about destroying state banking systems that threatened private usury.

The mechanism of enslavement works through mathematical impossibility. When banks create money as debt, every dollar in circulation requires more than a dollar to repay because of interest – but that extra money doesn’t exist unless more debt is created. Society must sink ever deeper into debt just to maintain the money supply, while compound interest transfers real wealth to parasites who produce nothing. When the Federal Reserve creates a trillion dollars with keystrokes, then collects interest on it forever, that’s counterfeiting with legal protection. Sir Josiah Stamp, former Bank of England director, stated it plainly: banks own the earth through their power to create deposits, and with a flick of the pen will create enough to buy it back again even if you took it away.

Today’s cascading crises are predictable outcomes of this system reaching its mathematical limits. The demographic collapse across developed nations – with fertility rates below replacement from Germany to Japan – stems directly from compound interest forcing both spouses to work ever-longer hours for diminishing purchasing power, making children unaffordable. The 2008 crisis that destroyed millions of lives while banks received trillion-dollar bailouts was the system working exactly as designed: create the bubble through easy credit, crash it through credit restriction, then seize real assets during the panic while taxpayers fund the rescue. Goodson documents how every leader who tried to reform this system – Lincoln, Garfield, Kennedy, Qathafi – was assassinated, while every nation that created sovereign money – Napoleonic France, Imperial Russia, National Socialist Germany, modern Libya – was destroyed through wars marketed to the public as ideological conflicts.

The implications of Goodson’s work challenge our entire understanding of modern history. Wars are fought to enforce banking monopolies, not ideologies. Democracy operates as theater while private banks hold true sovereignty through money creation. Our enslavement is mathematical rather than political. The current system’s end game is civilizational extinction, as usury makes human reproduction itself unaffordable. Yet the solution has been proven successful hundreds of times throughout history: governments must reclaim their sovereign right to create money debt-free for the public good, as the American colonies did with colonial scrip, as Lincoln did with greenbacks, as North Dakota does today. You’ve never heard these success stories. You don’t know banks create money from nothing. You believe wars are fought for freedom rather than to enforce debt slavery. This ignorance is carefully cultivated, because as Henry Ford warned, if people understood the banking system, there would be revolution before morning.

With thanks to Stephen Goodson. RIP.

A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind | Stephen Mitford Goodson

SOURCE: https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/a-history-of-central-banking-and

RELATED:

Where do your NZ loans & mortgages come from? You’ll be surprized

Image by Qubes Pictures from Pixabay

Consumer Reports testing finds ‘forever chemicals’ in baby formula

From ewg.org

The toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS contaminated “almost all” of the popular baby formula brands tested recently by Consumer Reports, it says in a new report.

These results are troubling. The study analyzed 41 popular baby formula brands, including well-known names like Enfamil and Similac, startups like Bobbie, and a range of store and imported brands, for the presence of chemicals like arsenic, lead, BPA, acrylamide and PFAS.  

Because the study tested just one sample per brand, more research is needed to be certain which ones contain forever chemicals.   

Even more concerning is that many of the PFAS compounds detected have not been thoroughly studied, leaving uncertainty about their potential health risks, especially for infant safety.

PFAS are everywhere, from cookware and food packaging to waterproof clothing and cosmetics. They contaminate water, food such as baby formula, soil, air and household dust, contributing to widespread exposure. 

Consumer Reports’ scientists detected PFAS in most of the formula samples, with one particularly concerning compound standing out: PFOS, detected in several samples. It is one of the most notorious PFAS, formerly an ingredient in 3M’s Scotchgard. It was phased out in the U.S. under pressure from the Environmental Protection Agency after revelations of PFOS health hazards

The EPA now regulates PFOS in drinking water with a maximum contaminant level of 4 parts per trillion, due to its classification as a carcinogen.

Because of its known toxicity and potential long-term health impacts, the presence of PFOS in any baby formula is especially alarming. PFAS don’t break down in the environment, and they build up in the human body over time. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has detected PFAS in the blood of 99 percent of Americans, including newborn babies

EWG’s PFAS map shows PFOS contamination in nearly half of the nation’s drinking water. Without any information to the contrary, it’s possible to surmise that some of the PFOS Consumer Reports detected comes from contaminated water used for the formula.

This possible source of PFOS in formula raises urgent questions about manufacturing processes and the need for stronger industry oversight and stricter safety standards to protect infants from exposure to hazardous chemicals.

PFAS exposure risks for babies and children

Babies and young children, whose bodies are still developing, are particularly vulnerable to PFAS exposure, which can have lifelong consequences. Their small size, growing organs and developing immune systems make them especially susceptible to the harmful effects of these bioaccumulative chemicals, which remain in the body for years. 

Even small amounts of PFAS in formula can add to cumulative exposure, putting infants’ growth and health at risk. 

Research has found PFAS in umbilical cord blood and breast milk, revealing direct prenatal and early-life exposure. Babies born with PFAS in their cord blood are more likely to have elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels – biomarkers linked to future heart disease. PFAS exposure also disrupts bile acids, which are essential for digestion and metabolism, so the risk of chronic health issues may go up as these children grow.

Even very low doses of PFAS can also weaken babies’ immune systems, making them more prone to infection and reducing vaccine effectiveness. PFAS exposure has also been linked to thyroid dysfunction, which can impair growth and brain development. In the gut, PFAS may alter the balance of microbial cells, disrupting digestion and weakening immune defenses.

As children age, the damage from early PFAS exposure continues to unfold. Research links PFAS to cognitive challengeslung issues and metabolic disorders, including altered glucose regulation in adulthood.

The need for stronger regulation

PFAS pollution has caused a widespread public health crisis. Over 143 million Americans are exposed because of their drinking water. These forever chemicals have contaminated the water supply at 8,865 sites in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and two U.S. territories. 

Yet despite mounting evidence of harm, our government mostly fails to regulate PFAS contamination of food, including baby formula.

Following Consumer Reports’ alarming findings, the Food and Drug Administration announced plans to strengthen oversight of the baby formula industry. The agency pledged to increase testing for heavy metals and other contaminants in formula, a welcome step.

But it remains unclear whether tests for PFAS will be included or whether the FDA will establish safe limits for these toxic chemicals in infant nutrition. Without stronger regulations, children will continue to be at risk of harm from this insidious threat.

We urgently need stricter regulations and greater accountability from industries that have allowed PFAS to infiltrate everyday life.

Consumer Reports’ findings are a wake-up call for regulators and manufacturers to prioritize infant safety by eliminating PFAS from formula and strengthening oversight.

What parents need to know

No parent should have to worry whether their baby’s formula contains toxic chemicals. Parents can take practical steps to help reduce their baby’s exposure, including

  • Using filtered water when preparing powdered formula. Since PFAS can contaminate tap water, a water filter can help reduce exposure. The most effective option is a reverse osmosis system installed under the sink or at the tap, but these systems can be costly. Fortunately, many countertop pitcher filters have also proven effective in lowering PFAS levels, according to EWG tests.
  • Pushing for stronger regulations. Parents can make their voices heard by supporting consumer safety initiatives that demand the FDA set stricter standards for PFAS and other contaminants in baby formula. Greater oversight and enforcement are essential to protecting infant health. 

No family should face the burden of toxic exposure from essential nutrition. By taking steps to reduce risk and advocating for stricter safety measures, parents can help protect their children’s health and push for long-overdue industry accountability.

SOURCE

Photo Credit: ewg.org

An update on the Pike River Mine Crime

Note: see EWNZ coverage here, here and hereEWNZ

MURDER AT PIKE RIVER

From Robin Westenra @ Seemorerocks substack

A few years ago I did quite a lot of coverage of the death of 29 coal miners at Pike Creek on the West Coast of New Zealand. =

This was completely eclipsed by “coronavirus”.

However, yesterday I went to a movie just released.

It was a moving film that focussed on two of the widows and their fight for justice. Historically, it was a mixture of accuracy and distortion.

However, more of that later.

I would like to concentrate on an interview (and a book) that caught my attention when it first came out.

THE BIGGER STORY

The audio I posted on my blog has long since disappeared due to censorship but I managed to find it again.

Here it is.

Pike River Mine, Jacob Cohen – Emergency Services Criminally Prevented From Doing Their Jobs

Read the book in .PDF HERE

 murderatpikerivermine (1st edition)
Murder-at-Pike-River-Mine 2nd edition

You can see this also covered HERE

HISTORY UNDER THE KEY GOVERNMENT

The film reveals how the government (along with police), from the very beginning tried to suppress the truth of what really went on.

There are persistent claims (by family supporters and some commentators) that:

A large tranche of evidence was effectively withheld or placed under very long restrictions (“embargoed for 100 years”).

One thing that does come out in the film is that a police whistleblower provided the family with footage, recorded in early 2011 by cameras lowered into the mine through bore-holes, showing a pair of glasses, rubber hosing and a wooden pallet and at least two intact bodies.

This is covered here.

On June 19, TV3’s Newshub aired more footage taken inside the Pike River Coal mine in New Zealand’s South Island, which exploded in November 2010, killing 29 men. The video, recorded in early 2011 by cameras lowered into the mine through bore-holes, shows a pair of glasses, rubber hosing and a wooden pallet.

It also clearly shows at least two intact bodies, and there are less clear images of what may be more bodies. These images have not been made public but have been viewed by the families and reporters.

The video is part of several hours of footage suppressed by police for more than six years. It was released to the victims’ families only after some excerpts were leaked and broadcast in April. That video showed members of Mines Rescue working inside the drift tunnel that leads into the main body of the mine. It discredits repeated National Party government claims that the mine is too dangerous to re-enter to investigate the precise cause of the explosion and to recover bodies.

The John Key government wanted to seal the mine with concrete and even proposed making the site into a National Park (something that has eventually.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/09/pike-river-mine-disaster-families-fight-to-stop-their-dead-being-sealed-away-forever

INACCURACIES IN THE MOVIE

That’s where the accuracy ends.

The film, only just released, practically ended with an agreement between the Labour Party and NZ First with a “commitment to re-enter the Pike River mine

After the agreement, on 20 November 2017 the Government announced the establishment of the Pike River Recovery Agency “to work in close partnership with the Pike 29 families … plan for decisions on the manned re-entry of the drift of the Pike River mine”.

The film shows a scene with a smiling, toothy, Jacinda Adern that mplies she is the hero.

There are two heroes amongst the families on the West Coast. One is trade unionist, Helen Kelly who appears briefly in the movie.

The other is Winston Peters who consistently supported the position of the families.

However, in the film Peters us conspicuous by his absence and Adern is portrayed as the hero.

Much was made in NZ media of bodies being found

This report says the families were “one step closer to discovering why CEO, Peter Whittle escaped prosectution.

However, it is clear that the cover-up continued.

From 2021

WINSTON PETERS ALLEGES THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT COVERING UP THE MINE DISASTER

Some of the best coverage came from WSWS, a British, Trotskyist publication that shows its true political colours when describing Winston Peters as a “right-wing nationalist”who is posing as a supporter of the families, presumably for cynical political reasons.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/08/04/pike-a04.html

The Labour Party-led government is racing to shut down the underground investigation of Pike River coal mine. It aims to prevent the recovery of evidence that could lead to prosecutions of those responsible for the disaster which killed 29 workers in November 2010.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/06/28/nzpi-j28.html?fbclid=IwAR1EWOIR2fBqjKI9sS81CigbcTaTYfK7vDN7xGFQpOnBlFdw6Mhtk9YfvQo

ANDREW LITTLE’S COMPLICITY

The article hones in on the disgusting Andrew Little, now mayor of Wellington – one of the most digusting figures amongst a very bad bunch.

The government is relying on the trade union bureaucracy, which has maintained a conspiracy of silence about the cover-up of one of the country’s worst industrial disasters. E tū, formerly known as the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union (EPMU), had 71 members at Pike River when it exploded; its current national secretary Bill Newson told the WSWS in May that the union “supports the government’s position regarding not re-entering the main mine.

Minister for Pike River Recovery Andrew Little, who ordered the shutdown of the investigation, was the head of the EPMU when Pike River exploded. This is a clear conflict of interest, since the union was complicit in the disaster. It took no action to stop workers entering the mine, despite knowing about the unsafe conditions. In the days after the disaster, Little defended the company’s safety record.

The government’s move to seal and walk away from the mine as quickly as possible raises disturbing questions of vital importance to the working class in New Zealand and internationally: What is the government seeking to bury, and why?

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/06/17/pike-j17.html

THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT SEALS THE MINE

https://envirowatchnz.com/category/pike-river/

On July 30, Winston Peters, leader of the right-wing nationalist New Zealand First Party, visited Greymouth, near Pike River, to pose as a supporter of the families. Peters served as deputy prime minister and foreign minister in Jacinda Ardern’s Labour-led 2017-2020 government, which also included the Green Party. NZ First lost all its seats in parliament in the October 2020 election, getting only 2.6 percent of the votes.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/03/11/pike-m11.html

And, yes, the mine HAS been sealed – something the mine owners and the authorities wanted from the start

The mine has been sealed after the re-entry of the access drift. It is no longer open for further human entry beyond the drift (and the drift itself is now closed). The focus now has shifted to borehole imaging and investigation rather than full human re-entry into the deeper workings (ChatGPT)

THE COVER-UP IS COMPLETE

This appears to be the end of matter

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/06/26/qgio-j26.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Apart from a movie the issue seems to have just died in the eyes of the public

SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS – A CRIME SCENE BECOMES A TOURIST ATTRACTION

According to Chat GPT

Here are some of the more recent developments:

  • The Pike River Recovery Agency (PRRA) was officially disestablished 1 July 2022 after handing the mine site over to Department of Conservation (DOC).
  • On 23 June 2023 police announced that human remains of “two, possibly three” miners were located in the mine during borehole drilling.

https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/23/pike-river-remains-of-up-to-three-miners-located/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

  • DOC has taken steps to develop the site as a memorial and legacy project: the Pike 29 Memorial Track was officially opened in February 2024, connecting the Paparoa Track to the mine‐valley.

The key oversight/government function has shifted: DOC now manages the site and holds the mine records; the PRRA’s core job is done

https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/23/pike-river-remains-of-up-to-three-miners-located/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

A cover-up nicely done!

AFTERWORD

I’ll leave the final word to ChatGPT, which reflects my own thinking

  1. Bodies still unrecovered – symbolic of a nation’s unhealed wound. The miners remain entombed, and so the event lives on in suspension.
  2. Royal Commission embargo – even if for procedural reasons, it feels to many like truth deferred; the official narrative remains partially sealed.
  3. Site handed to DoC – once seen as a desecration when raised by Key’s government, now presented as closure under Labour. It marks the bureaucratic transformation of tragedy into heritage — tidy for institutions, painful for families.
  4. No criminal convictions – not for lack of evidence, but because the system itself balked. The unlawful deal that let Peter Whittall avoid prosecution was later condemned by the Supreme Court, yet still left no accountability.
  5. Public fatigue – the story, so long and grim, has receded from the headlines. The movie revives empathy, but for a moment; institutions remain unmoved.

So what is one to say?


Perhaps only that Pike River has become a mirror — of how modern states manage moral disasters. The language of “closure” replaces justice; “risk management” replaces responsibility. A memorial track is built, and the living are invited to walk through a landscape the dead cannot leave.

It’s not cynicism to observe this — it’s simply to note that when a society can’t finish a story, it builds a monument instead.

SOURCE

Header Image by Markus Winkler from Pixabay

The Truth About the ‘Great Irish Famine’ of 1845-1850

An exposé of the Irish famine (book review) … further illustration of how genocide is not new, and how the victors write our histories … a must read. I encourage you to sub to Unbecoming’s excellent substack. EWNZ

From From Unbekoming @ substack

By Chris Fogarty – 30 Q&As – Unbekoming Book Summary

For over 170 years, the world has been told that Ireland suffered a natural famine between 1845 and 1850 – a tragic tale of potato blight and a foolish population’s over-dependence on a single crop. This story, taught in universities, memorialized in museums, and repeated in countless history books, has one fundamental problem: it’s a deliberate lie. Christopher Fogarty’s “Ireland 1845-1850: The Perfect Holocaust and Who Kept it ‘Perfect’” demolishes this narrative with military deployment records, shipping manifests, and Ordnance Survey maps that reveal what actually happened. While only the potato crop failed, Ireland continued producing massive quantities of grain, cattle, dairy, and other foods – all of which were removed at gunpoint by 67 British Army regiments, approximately half of Britain’s entire military force, and shipped to England while the producers starved. The death toll wasn’t the officially claimed 21,770 but approximately five million people, half of Ireland’s population.

The evidence Fogarty presents reads like a prosecutor’s case file. He names every British regiment involved, tracking their movements through Ireland’s 32 counties via National Archives records. He identifies General Sir Edward Blakeney as the Commander-in-Chief who orchestrated this operation from before 1845 through after 1851 – a man Queen Victoria honored with the Order of the Bath in 1849 as he neared completion of his genocidal mission….

READ AT THE LINK

The book title:

“Ireland 1845-1850: the Perfect Holocaust, and Who Kept it “”Perfect.”

Image by Fathromi Ramdlon from Pixabay

Glyphosate and Cancer: A Textbook Case of “Manufacturing Doubt”

From Sustainable Pulse
Source: Le Monde, By Stéphane Foucart

A recent study confirming the herbicide’s carcinogenic potential has been the subject of fierce criticism. However, this criticism is based on flawed scientific grounds, Le Monde has reported.

The recent publication of a study indicating an increased risk of various tumors in laboratory rats exposed to glyphosate has sparked numerous comments on social media and in the press, aimed at downplaying or denigrating this research.

These results, published on June 10 in the journal Environmental Health, only confirm the conclusions of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which estimated in 2015 that the studies available at the time provided “sufficient evidence” of glyphosate’s carcinogenicity in animals.

The attacks on this study, led by the Ramazzini Institute in Bologna, Italy, offer an exemplary array of the sleight of hand of “doubt manufacturing,” a rhetoric aimed at undermining confidence in scientific results, often used to delay or fight regulatory decisions.

“The journal is unknown, so the study is flawed.”

Eric Billy, an immuno-oncology researcher, was among the most vocal critics of the Ramazzini Institute study (which was actually an international study with authors from all over the world not just the Ramazzini Institute), which he deemed “flawed.” In a series of messages published on June 14 on his X and Bluesky accounts, which received numerous retweets, this employee of the pharmaceutical company Novartis first accused its authors of having “chosen a more lenient journal to avoid criticism,” explaining that he would have expected to read this article in the journals “Nature, Science, or Cell,” which he believes are of higher quality.

WHY IT IS IRRELEVANT

Environmental Health, published by the SpringerNature group, is actually one of the most influential journals in its field. Its citation rate places it 32nd out of 687 indexed journals covering the fields of public health, environmental health, or occupational health, according to the 2024 ranking by scientific publisher Elsevier. Prestigious journals like Nature or Science do not generally publish tests like the one conducted by the Ramazzini Institute.

“A number of reliable and high-quality toxicity studies, like the one you share with us, are published in specialized journals,” explains Meagan Phelan, spokesperson for publications published under the Science banner. “Although these are essential elements of substance assessment, these tests are not considered conceptual advances and, as such, Science does not generally publish them.”

“Exposed animals live as long as others”

The Ramazzini study did not reveal any significant difference in mortality between rats exposed to glyphosate and unexposed control rats. This point was highlighted by Mr. Billy to put the study’s conclusions into perspective. And it hit the mark: it was later reported in Le Figaro, which saw it as the “first lesson” of this work.

WHY IT’S MORE COMPLICATED

The fact that the study did not reveal any significant differences in survival rates between the two groups was not presented by the Ramazzini researchers as a result in itself. Their protocol was, in fact, designed to detect the carcinogenic potential of a product, not its effect on the animals’ survival: all of them were sacrificed two-thirds of the way through their lives, at the age of 104 weeks. Now, it’s easy to understand that if human smokers were compared to non-smokers, the mortality differences would be small if all individuals were euthanized at the age of 50.

In reality, the absence of a mortality difference between groups of animals over the duration of the test is mainly a guarantee of the quality of the study, for statistical reasons. An animal that dies prematurely will have been exposed for a shorter time to the substance tested, and the probability of tumors developing in its group will therefore be reduced. Its statistical weight in the analysis will therefore be different. A high survival rate in each group, both treated and control, guarantees the “maintenance of statistical power” of the experiment, according to the good practice guides in toxicology (maintained by the OECD).

“The chosen rodent strain is not appropriate.”

Several commentators have also criticized the Ramazzini Institute researchers’ choice of the so-called “Sprague-Dawley” rat strain. Eric Billy argues that the use of this type of rat “has already been strongly criticized by the scientific community due to an abnormally high frequency of spontaneous tumor lesions compared to other rodent strains,” recalling that this strain was used by Gilles-Eric Séralini in his famous and controversial study on GMOs.

WHY THIS IS INCORRECT

In reality, the high rates of spontaneous tumors observed in the “Sprague-Dawley” strain only concern certain sites (tumors of the mammary gland, pituitary gland, etc., found at comparable rates in the treated and control groups). Furthermore, the researchers have at their disposal an abundant literature to take into account the specific characteristics of this strain.

Not only is the “Sprague-Dawley” strain not problematic in itself, but it is the most widely used. In 2024, researchers showed that more than 55% of the 263 carcinogenicity studies of active ingredients conducted in recent years on rats used this strain. The carcinogenicity of Ruxolitinib, a drug substance marketed by Novartis, was, for example, tested on this strain. As for Dr. Séralini’s study (published in 2012, before being retracted and then republished), the choice of strain was not, in itself, among the criticisms made. As summarized by IARC experts in 2015, it was the entire protocol implemented that was criticized.

“The doses tested are unrealistic”

Like several other critical voices, Eric Billy is surprised by the high doses of glyphosate to which rats were exposed in the Ramazzini Institute study, stating that “even the lowest dose tested far exceeds actual human [dietary] exposure” and that “the other two doses are therefore a hundred and a thousand times higher than this human exposure.” The same argument and the same figure are used in Le Figaro.

WHY IT IS IRRELEVANT

This argument is frequently raised to challenge the relevance of the results of animal studies. However, millions of humans exposed for decades cannot be compared to a hundred rats exposed for 24 months. The purpose of these tests is to characterize the carcinogenic potential of substances, not to assess the risks faced by the population at actual exposure levels (sometimes much higher than dietary exposure, for people living near farms, farm workers, etc.).

In fact, the Glyphosate has already been associated with an increased risk of certain lymphomas in farmers in four meta-analyses and one pooled study—the highest levels of evidence in epidemiology. Animal studies allow us to interpret these results, suggesting that these associations are indicative of a causal link. And even if we give credence to the “too high dose” argument, the objection remains unfounded.

The Ramazzini study indeed examined the effects of glyphosate at considerably lower doses than all previous similar studies. In the seven studies selected by European authorities during their latest assessment of the herbicide molecule, the lowest doses tested were 12 to 420 times higher than in the Ramazzini study, and the highest exposures were 10 to 33 times higher.

“The route of exposure is not adequate.”

In the Ramazzini study, the animals were exposed to glyphosate through drinking water, not food. Mr. Billy maintains that this is inadequate, arguing that humans are more likely to be exposed through food.

WHY IT IS IRRELEVANT

Among the animal studies on glyphosate submitted to health authorities or evaluated by IARC, none has been deemed inadmissible because it opted for a similar exposure route. Drinking water is, moreover, considered acceptable for assessing “food or environmental chemicals, including pesticides,” just like diet, according to OECD Good Practice Guide No. 451.

This false controversy is a classic argument. In 1953, the Sloan Kettering Institute’s first work on the carcinogenic potential of tobacco involved observing the development of tumors on the shaved skin of rodents after smearing it with cigarette tar extracts. The American Tobacco Company criticized the scientists’ use of a “high concentration of smoke extracts—entirely different from the smoke a person might inhale from a cigarette,” while stating that “all scientists agree that there is no known relationship between skin cancers in mice and lung cancers in humans.”

Like the Ramazzini researchers, those at the Sloan Kettering Institute were not seeking to exactly mimic human exposure to the agent being tested (no one smears cigarette tar on themselves), but to test its carcinogenic potential.

“The number of animals is insufficient”

In his critical thread, Eric Billy makes a calculation estimating that, to achieve greater statistical robustness, the Ramazzini researchers should have used at least three times as many rats, or 160 to 220 individuals per group.

WHY THIS IS INCORRECT

Such requirements are fanciful. No chronic toxicity or carcinogenicity study of glyphosate conducted on rats has ever enrolled so many animals. All studies similar to those of Ramazzini one have included around 50 rats per group. And for good reason: this is the threshold recommended by the OECD guidance document.

“In this case, it is completely ridiculous to require more animals per group,” asserts American biostatistician Christopher Portier, former director of the US National Toxicology Program, whose work is an authority on the subject. According to this specialist, an expert witness for plaintiffs in several ongoing trials in the United States, the Ramazzini researchers “managed to demonstrate a statistically significant trend toward an increase in certain tumors in the treated animals, even though there were only 50 per group. Why would the experiment be repeated with more animals to gain more statistical power?”

In reality, it is when a statistically significant effect is not found that it is possible to argue that the number of animals is too small, and that it may be useful to increase statistical power. “The only disadvantage of having 50 rats per group, rather than 160 or 220, is ‘missing’ an effect, certainly not seeing an effect that doesn’t exist,” concludes Mr. Portier.

This article benefited from discussions with researchers at the Ramazzini Institute and critical review by three researchers (INRAE ​​and INSERM) involved in toxicology work involving animal studies.

What is the “manufacturing of doubt”?

As science historians Naomi Oreskes (Harvard University) and Erik Conway (NASA) have shown in a landmark book (Merchants of Doubt, 2012), the “manufacturing of doubt” was developed in the 1950s by tobacco companies to deny or relativize the effects of cigarettes.

This rhetoric turns science against itself, by distorting the intellectual tools at the heart of scientists’ approaches (methodical doubt, demands for rigor, distrust of claims perceived as spectacular, etc.). It is thus very effective on members of the scientific and medical communities who do not work directly on the targeted subjects, as well as on audiences attached to rationality and the defense of scientific values, or even journalists who sometimes repeat such circulating arguments without thinking twice.

A highly effective propaganda technique, “manufacturing doubt” sometimes requires lengthy explanations to unmask, especially since it sometimes mixes legitimate criticisms with others based on untruths, misinterpretations, or simply erroneous considerations. It constitutes a toolbox constantly used for decades by a variety of industrial sectors wishing to protect their activities from any health or environmental regulation.

SOURCE LINK

Ed Dowd, leading data expert: 5,000 DEATHS PER WEEK Linked to Covid ‘Vaccines’, Insurance Data Reveals

From Slay News via Exposing the Darkness @ substack

“Injuries are 10–15 times higher … 30–50-year-olds are dropping dead… The victims fear backlash or can’t accept they were misled …The media and tech giants actively suppress these stories … “

Note: Barry Young, NZ data analyst also revealed shocking details he discovered in our data and was promptly shut down, vilified and silenced… take note Kiwis … it appears that the safe & effective is not & it is still being promoted (more links here) EWNZ


Wall Street Whistleblower Reveals Grim Truth Behind Rising Deaths of the Young and Fit

Edward Dowd, a veteran data analyst and ex-BlackRock executive, has just blown the lid off a terrifying trend: 5,000 people are dying every week, and the insurance industry knows why.

Linked directly to Covid mRNA ‘vaccines’, the spike in excess deaths is especially devastating among young adults.

Dowd says the silence is deadly, and the numbers are undeniable.


By Frank Bergman July 23, 2025

One of the world’s leading data experts has revealed that the insurance industry is now seeing up to 5,000 deaths every single week that are linked to Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The staggering death toll was disclosed by Edward Dowd, a renowned Wall Street data analyst.

Dowd dropped the bombshell during a recent interview on the Commodity Culture podcast.

While sounding the alarm about the discovery, Dowd revealed that the number of healthy young adults “dropping dead” has skyrocketed.

He also notes that “vaccine” injuries are now “10-15 times higher” than before the mass Covid “vaccination” campaign.

Worryingly, however, he says that “vaccine” injury victims and families of the dead are too afraid to speak out because they “fear backlash.”

Dowd argues that the reports on mRNA injection-related deaths and injuries are being shut down by Big Tech and the corporate media.

In the United States alone, Dowd revealed that insurance data shows “3,000–5,000 vaccine-linked deaths a week.”

“Injuries are 10–15 times higher,” he added.

“30–50-year-olds are dropping dead.

“The victims fear backlash or can’t accept they were misled.

“The media and tech giants actively suppress these stories,” he warns.

(click on the image below to watch video at rumble.com)

Dowd, a former executive at the world’s largest investment firm, BlackRock, has been sounding the alarm about surging deaths among the Covid-vaxxed for some time.

He is considered one of America’s leading data experts.

Through his expert analysis of insurance industry data, Dowd has become a prominent figure in investigations into the impact of the global Covid “vaccination” campaign.

As Slay News previously reported, Dowd dropped a chilling warning in April after uncovering evidence showing that the number of excess deaths of working-age Americans is skyrocketing.

According to an alarming warning from Dowd, insurance industry data shows that excess deaths are soaring among people aged 18 to 64 years old.

These deaths started exploding after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

However, the deaths appear to show no signs of slowing down, despite the pandemic being long over and “vaccination” rates dropping off.

In January 2022, Life Insurance CEO Scott Davidson reported that death rates among working-aged people aged 18 to 64 were “up 40 percent over what they were pre-pandemic.”

He explained that a 40 percent spike in deaths was completely unprecedented.

Davidson compared a 10 percent rise in deaths to a once-in-200-year flood.

According to Dowd, excess deaths are now “off the charts.”

Davidson also noted that excess deaths that started surging in 2021 were non-Covid deaths.

(click on the image below to watch video at rumble.com)

Meanwhile, other highly vaccinated nations around the world are continuing to sound the alarm about surging deaths.

An explosive new alert has emerged from Singapore regarding the nation’s skyrocketing excess death rate among those who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The chilling data has raised serious questions about the true toll of the aggressive global Covid “vaccination” campaign.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that “excess deaths” are the number of deaths above what would be expected based on historical trends.

According to bombshell data from the Human Mortality Database (HMD) and peer-reviewed studies, the country experienced a sharp and sustained rise in excess deaths immediately following the rollout of Covid “vaccines.”

The spike is an ominous signal that the vaccines may have played a significant role in the surge of mortality.

The data paints a disturbing picture of a country that, despite being one of the most vaccinated in the world, is facing unprecedented levels of death.

In March 2022, excess mortality in Singapore spiked to an astonishing 49.9% above expected deaths.

The broader period between February and April 2022 saw an average of 24.0% higher deaths than usual.

Alarmingly, however, this wasn’t a temporary uptick.

Excess deaths have continued surging long after the pandemic.

As of December 2024, the most recent data reveals that excess deaths in Singapore have stabilized at approximately 25-30% above the historical baseline.

The data suggests that this elevated mortality rate has become the new normal for the fully “vaccinated” nation.

SOURCE

The Covid-19 ‘Vaccine’ Fact Sheet – FYI by The NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science (NZDSOS)

The New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) have provided a fact sheet on their covid-19 ‘vaccine’ (experimental injection) concerns. EWNZ


PREPARED BY INDEPENDENT DOCTORS OF NEW ZEALAND

ABOUT THE ISSUE

Over 300 medical professionals and 55,000 New Zealanders have strong concerns about
covid-19 vaccines. Since 2021, formal communications have been sent to government
officials and regulators documenting serious safety issues with covid-19 mRNA vaccines

KEY SAFETY CONCERNS
DNA CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED

  • Laboratory testing by virologist Dr David Speicher and nine independent labs worldwide has confirmed all tested vials are heavily contaminated with synthetic DNA
  • The FDA has received a landmark Citizen Petition (21 January 2025) demanding immediate revocation of approvals for Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax
  • DNA levels exceed the 10 ng/dose limit by up to 145 times
  • Lipid nanoparticle encapsulation may allow synthetic DNA to integrate with our own DNA, with potential to cause permanent genetic changes and heighten cancer risk
  • Billions of cancer-causing SV40 (monkey virus) DNA insertions per dose have been found
  • At least one of the tested contaminated Australian batches was administered to New Zealand children

Read &/or download the pdf for more info at the link

RELATED:
The Vaccine Harms Study That’s Been Buried

Image by Wilfried Pohnke from Pixabay

More Than Half Of UK Government Nutrition Advisors Are Paid By Food Companies – US Is No Better – BlackRock Invests In Them All

Surprised? ….

From The Winepress @ substack

“There has been an explosion of suffering and death from diet-related disease in the UK so I don’t think it’s credible to claim that the committee has been very effective,” said a London professor.

This chart by Quartr illustrates the brands within 12 of the largest ...

The following report was first published on winepressnews.com on January 8th, 2025. The following report is by the BMJ Group, first published on September 12th, 2024:

More than half of the experts on the UK government’s nutrition advisory panel have links to the food industry, reveals an investigation by The BMJ today.

At least 11 of the 17 members of the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) have conflicts of interest with the likes of Nestle, sugar manufacturer Tate and Lyle, and the world’s largest ice cream producer, Unilever, reports freelance journalist Sophie Borland.

And at least six out of the 11 members of SACN’s Subgroup on Maternal and Child Nutrition have ties to food firms, including baby food manufacturers and formula milk brands.

SACN is a powerful group of people appointed as independent experts to advise the government, which in turn influences policy, explains Borland. Since being set up in 2000 it has produced high profile guidelines on daily salt and sugar intake, vitamin D supplements, and feeding babies.

But there is concern that both SACN – and the previous governments reviewing its recommendations – have not done enough to curb rising obesity levels and food-related ill health.

The BMJ looked at the interests declared by SACN members – in publicly available documents published on the government website – within the past three years.

Among them is David Mela, a retired senior scientist from Unilever, who has done consultancy work for Unilever, Tate and Lyle, Coca Cola’s Israel franchise CBC Israel, and Cargill, which produces cocoa and chocolate products among other things.

Another member, Julie Lovegrove, is chair of an expert group at the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Europe, whose member companies include Pepsico, Cadbury’s US owner Mondelez, and General Mills, the American firm behind Cheerios and Haagen Dazs.

Members of SACN’s Maternal and Child Nutrition subgroup include Ann Prentice, a council member of the Nestle Foundation, and Marion Hetherington who has undertaken work for Danone and baby food brand Ella’s Kitchen, the latter on an unpaid basis. The group’s chair, Ken Ong, has also received research funding from Mead Johnston Nutrition, which makes formula milk.

The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) responded on behalf of SACN and all members named in this article, saying SACN members are required to declare any potential conflicts of interest annually – and new ones at the first appropriate committee meeting, which are included in the minutes and published on the SACN website.

It added: “No members of the committee are directly employed by the food and drink industry, and all have a duty to act in the public interest and to be independent and impartial.”

But Chris van Tulleken, associate professor at University College London and author of a best-selling book on ultra-processed food, says: “Even small financial conflicts affect behaviour and beliefs in subtle or unconscious ways,” while Rob Percival, head of policy at the Soil Association, says: “We’re concerned that the committee and its integrity might be undermined by those ties to the food industry.”

Experts tell The BMJ the make-up of SACN needs to be reviewed in light of members’ ties to the food industry. However, Kat Jenner, director of the Obesity Health Alliance, says these ties are partly a result of the lack of money in relevant research.

Alison Tedstone, former chief nutritionist for Public Health England, also suggests that refusing to allow experts with industry ties on SACN would “diminish” its expertise and could delay future legislation.

Yet Van Tulleken insists: “Despite two decades of work from a conflicted SACN there has been an explosion of suffering and death from diet-related disease in the UK so I don’t think it’s credible to claim that the committee has been very effective.

“There are some excellent independent experts but they are a minority and in my view their work has been hampered by conflicts of interest with the industry that has created this health crisis. SACN must become independent of the food industry.”

The WinePress News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

SOURCE

Image Credit: pixabay.com

Why “vaccination” has made flying so dangerous: Since early 2023, 86 pilots, 7 flight attendants and 22 airport workers have all “died suddenly”

From Prof Mark Crispin Miller @ Substack

It isn’t just the ‘safe & effective’ itself that’s killing us, but its consequences all throughout society—including the airliners, many small planes and helicopters, and the military

READ AT THE LINK

Note: scroll to the end of this article, and peruse the author’s list of sudden deaths and related info … EWNZ

RELATED:

There has been an increasing number of stories of pilots and flight attendants suffering cardiac arrests and sudden deaths in-flight

Image by Zac from Pixabay

How schools became indoctrination centers

From Unbekoming @ substack

Preface

This essay builds primarily on Eric Dubay’s “Schools = Forced Government Indoctrination Camps,” which synthesizes and presents the historical transformation of American education into a system of control. Dubay’s work itself draws heavily on the pioneering research of John Taylor Gatto and Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, whose decades of investigation and documentation provide the foundational evidence for understanding how schools became indoctrination centers.

John Taylor Gatto, the award-winning New York teacher who quit because he was “no longer willing to hurt children,” offers an insider’s testimony that validates everything Dubay documents. His “Seven-Lesson Schoolteacher” strips away the veneer of education to reveal the actual curriculum: confusion, class position, indifference, emotional dependency, intellectual dependency, provisional self-esteem, and constant surveillance. These aren’t failures of the system—they are the system.

The Great Dumbing

The Great Dumbing

Unbekoming

October 1, 2023

Read full story

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt brings the receipts. As a senior policy advisor in the Reagan administration’s Department of Education, she had access to the documents that prove the deliberate nature of education’s destruction. Her book “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” provides the paper trail—the foundation reports, government memos, and policy documents that show this was never about education. It was always about control.

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

Unbekoming

November 30, 2024

Read full story

Together, these three sources paint a picture that many will find difficult to accept: that the schools we trust with our children were designed as factories to produce compliant workers and consumers, not educated citizens capable of self-governance. The evidence they present isn’t theoretical or conspiratorial—it comes from the architects of the system themselves, who wrote quite plainly about their intentions to use schooling to create a manageable society.

Understanding this history matters now more than ever. As we witness populations accepting unprecedented restrictions on their freedom, as we see adults unable to evaluate conflicting claims or think beyond expert pronouncements, as we observe the widespread inability to imagine alternatives to existing systems—we’re seeing the intended outcomes of a century-long project. The dumbing down wasn’t a mistake. The destruction of critical thinking wasn’t accidental. The production of dependent, anxious, controllable populations was the goal.

This essay synthesizes the work of Dubay, Gatto, and Iserbyt to tell the complete story: how American education was captured, transformed, and weaponized against the very people it claims to serve. The truth they reveal is uncomfortable, even painful. But until we understand how thoroughly we’ve been processed by this system, we cannot begin to reclaim our capacity for independent thought and autonomous action. And without that capacity, we remain what the system designed us to be: human resources awaiting instruction.

Introduction: The Uncomfortable Truth About Modern Schooling

Before 1852, American education consisted of one-room schoolhouses, independent teachers, and students of all ages attending of their own free will. A child in 1840s America might spend a few months learning to read from the Bible, master arithmetic through practical farm calculations, and study rhetoric from books that would challenge today’s college students. The literacy rate in Connecticut showed only one in every 579 people was illiterate. Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” sold 600,000 copies to a population of just 3 million—of whom twenty percent were slaves and fifty percent indentured servants.

Today’s reality presents a stark contrast. After twelve years of mandatory schooling, one in five American adults is functionally illiterate. Students graduate unable to think critically, emotionally dependent on authority, and conditioned to accept their place in economic hierarchies they don’t understand. This transformation didn’t happen by accident or incompetence. As John Taylor Gatto discovered during his thirty years as a New York City teacher—including three awards as Teacher of the Year—the system works exactly as designed. The problem is that it was never designed to educate.

The architects of modern schooling stated their intentions plainly. In 1906, William Torrey Harris, U.S. Commissioner of Education, declared that ninety-nine students out of one hundred are “automata, careful to walk in prescribed paths, careful to follow the prescribed custom.” This wasn’t a lament but a goal. John D. Rockefeller, whose General Education Board would reshape American schools, was even more explicit in his mission statement: “We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of science. We have not to raise up from them authors, educators, poets, or men of letters… The task is simple. We will organize children and teach them in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.”

Charlotte Iserbyt, a former senior policy advisor in the Reagan administration’s Department of Education, spent decades documenting how this agenda unfolded through the 20th century. Her research reveals a paper trail of deliberate decisions to transform American education from a system developing individual potential into one producing manageable populations. The methods evolved—from Prussian discipline to Soviet psychology to Silicon Valley algorithms—but the objective remained constant: replacing critical thinking with conditioned responses.

This is not a story of good intentions gone wrong. It’s a documented history of powerful interests using schools to solve what they saw as the problem of too much democracy, too much individual liberty, and too many people capable of questioning authority. Understanding this history isn’t merely academic—it’s essential for recognizing why millions of adults today struggle to evaluate evidence, question experts, or imagine alternatives to the systems that confine them.

The Architecture of Control: From Local to Federal

The transformation of American education from local community schools to a federalized system of control happened through calculated steps spanning seventy years. Between 1852 and 1918, every state adopted compulsory schooling laws—not because communities demanded them, but despite fierce resistance at every turn. As Edward Ross wrote in 1901, plans were underway to “replace community, family, and church with propaganda, education, and mass media.” The state would shake loose from church and reach out to school, making children belong “more to the state and less and less to the parent.”

The initial laws seemed modest. Ten to twelve weeks of attendance for children aged nine to twelve. But incrementally, like a ratchet that only turns one way, the requirements expanded. The school year lengthened from three months to nine. The age range stretched downward to kindergarten and upward through high school. By the 1970s, four-year-olds entered preschool, and by 2000, twenty-six-year-old doctors were still being institutionalized in formal education. Each extension came wrapped in the language of opportunity and progress, never acknowledging that longer schooling meant longer separation from family, community, and meaningful work.

The federalization began in earnest with the 1870 founding of the National Education Association, which immediately announced that science courses nationwide must restructure to teach evolution as fact, not theory. This wasn’t about science—it was about establishing that centralized authorities, not local communities, would determine what children learned. The pattern repeated with each federal intervention: create a crisis, propose a solution requiring centralized control, then never relinquish that control regardless of outcomes.

World War I provided the perfect crisis. The U.S. Army’s intelligence tests revealed that hundreds of thousands of recruits were illiterate—though literacy had been near-universal before compulsory schooling. Rather than question why forced education produced worse results than voluntary learning, reformers demanded more control, more standardization, more years of mandatory attendance. The military’s need for compliant soldiers who followed orders without question became the template for producing compliant workers who would accept industrial discipline without resistance.

The Reece Committee of 1953 and the earlier Walsh Commission both concluded that private foundations—particularly Rockefeller and Carnegie—had essentially purchased control of American education policy. Norman Dodd, the Reece Committee’s research director, reported a chilling conversation with Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation. Gaither told him bluntly that these foundations operated under White House directives to “use our grant-making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” When Dodd suggested this investigation might proceed, Gaither warned: “If you proceed with the investigation as you have outlined, you will be killed.”

The creation of the U.S. Department of Education in 1979 completed the architecture of control. What began as local parents teaching their children to read had become a vast bureaucracy employing millions, consuming hundreds of billions of dollars, and producing steadily declining results. Yet the worse the outcomes, the more power and funding the system demanded. Failure became its own justification for expansion.

Gatto observed this paradox firsthand: the system’s failures weren’t bugs but features. Every reform that promised to help struggling students actually extended institutional control over their lives. Every program to close achievement gaps widened them. Every initiative to promote critical thinking produced more passive conformity. The architecture wasn’t broken—it was performing exactly as its architects intended, creating what Iserbyt documented as “the deliberate dumbing down of America.”

The Hidden Curriculum: Seven Lessons of Compliance

John Taylor Gatto’s revelation came after winning his third Teacher of the Year award in 1991. In his acceptance speech—later published as “The Seven-Lesson Schoolteacher”—he exposed what he actually taught, regardless of the subject on his certificate. These seven lessons form the hidden curriculum of every American school, the real content beneath the surface of math, English, and history.

The first lesson is confusion. Nothing connects to anything else. Students jump from mathematics to literature to physical education at the ring of a bell, with no relationship between subjects, no unified understanding of the world. As Gatto explained, children learn “the un-relating of everything,” an infinite fragmentation that prevents them from ever constructing coherent meaning from their experience. A child studying the Revolutionary War at 10:15 must instantly forget it at 11:00 to memorize plant cells, then abandon those at 11:45 for Spanish conjugations. This deliberate incoherence isn’t poor planning—it’s the point. Confused people don’t ask dangerous questions.

The second lesson is class position. Students are numbered, sorted, tracked, and labeled from their first day. They learn to stay where they’re placed, to envy those above them and despise those below. The lesson penetrates so deeply that adults continue competing for position decades after graduation, never questioning why human worth should be ranked and sorted like industrial products. The gifted program teaches arrogance, the remedial class teaches shame, and everyone learns their place in hierarchies they didn’t create and can’t escape.

The third lesson is indifference. Nothing is worth finishing. No project, no thought, no conversation survives the bell. Students learn to invest themselves completely in the moment’s task, then abandon it without hesitation when authority demands. This produces adults who can’t sustain attention, can’t delay gratification, and can’t complete anything without external compulsion. They become perfect consumers, always seeking the next stimulation, never satisfied, never still.

The fourth lesson is emotional dependency. Stars, stickers, grades, and praise teach children that their worth depends on authority’s approval. The teacher’s mood becomes the classroom’s weather. A smile means you’re good; a frown means you’re bad. Decades later, these same students desperately seek validation from bosses, experts, and celebrities, unable to trust their own judgment about their own value. They’ve been taught that self-respect is arrogance and self-knowledge is delusion.

The fifth lesson is intellectual dependency. Good students wait for teachers to tell them what to think. Of the infinite things worth learning, only those assigned matter. Curiosity becomes cheating—looking ahead in the book, asking about topics not on the test, wondering about connections the curriculum doesn’t make. The successful student is one who can suppress their own interests and enthusiastically perform assigned thinking. This produces adults who wait for experts to explain reality, who cannot form opinions without official guidance, who panic when faced with questions that don’t have authorized answers.

The sixth lesson is provisional self-esteem. Report cards teach that worth is always conditional, always measured, always compared. A child who knows they’re loved regardless of performance is impossible to control. So schools ensure that no achievement is ever enough, no status ever secure. The honor student fears the first B, the athlete dreads the faster rival, everyone learns that identity itself is provisional, subject to constant evaluation and revision by authority.

The seventh lesson is that one can’t hide. Surveillance is constant and total. Hall passes, bathroom monitors, homework that invades home life, guidance counselors who demand emotional transparency, standardized tests that measure the psyche as much as knowledge. Students learn that privacy is suspicious, that secrets are dangerous, that authority has the right to know everything. They’re being prepared for a world of credit scores, social media surveillance, and employment monitoring that tracks every keystroke.

These seven lessons explain why school reform always fails. You can’t fix a system that’s working perfectly. The hidden curriculum produces exactly what it was designed to produce: emotionally needy, intellectually dependent, confused and compliant people who will fill the jobs they’re given, buy the products they’re told to want, and never question the structures that confine them.

The Rockefeller Design: Engineering Society Through Schools

The Rockefeller influence on American education represents one of history’s most successful social engineering projects. Through the General Education Board, founded in 1903 with an initial endowment rivaling the entire federal budget for education, John D. Rockefeller didn’t just reform schools—he rebuilt them from the foundation up to serve industrial capitalism’s need for manageable workers and predictable consumers.

The General Education Board’s mission statement deserves careful reading because it states explicitly what critics of education usually only suspect. “In our dreams,” it declared, “people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present education conventions of intellectual and character education fade from their minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our own goodwill upon a grateful and responsive folk.” This wasn’t educational philosophy—it was industrial production applied to human beings.

Rockefeller’s lieutenants understood that direct control would provoke resistance. Instead, they used grants and gifts to make schools dependent on foundation money, then attached conditions that seemed reasonable but fundamentally altered education’s purpose. Teacher training colleges received millions, but only if they adopted foundation-approved curricula that emphasized classroom management over subject knowledge. School districts got new buildings if they implemented “scientific” tracking systems that sorted students into future roles. Universities expanded with Rockefeller funds, then found their research agendas shaped by what the foundation would finance.

The strategy worked through three mechanisms that Charlotte Iserbyt documents extensively. First, they funded the experts who would define educational problems and solutions. When the National Education Association needed research, Rockefeller foundations provided it. When superintendents wanted training, Rockefeller programs delivered it. Soon, questioning foundation-backed reforms meant questioning science itself.

Second, they created interlocking networks of influence. Foundation trustees sat on education boards, education leaders joined foundation committees, and everyone attended the same conferences, read the same journals, and cited the same research—all funded by the same source. Dissent didn’t need to be suppressed because dissenters couldn’t get hired, published, or promoted within this self-reinforcing system.

Third, they played a long game measured in generations, not election cycles. While politicians came and went, the foundations persisted, accumulating influence like compound interest. A teacher trained in 1920 under Rockefeller-funded programs would still be teaching Rockefeller methods in 1960. A superintendent who implemented foundation reforms in one district would be promoted to spread them to another. Each generation of educators grew up assuming foundation priorities were simply how education worked.

The Rockefeller foundations didn’t work alone. The Carnegie Corporation, established by another industrial titan who understood that controlling education meant controlling society, pursued parallel strategies. Together, they funded the transformation of reading instruction from phonics to “look-say” methods that produced functional illiteracy. They promoted the replacement of classical education with vocational training. They supported the elimination of history in favor of “social studies” that disconnected students from their past.

The brilliance of the Rockefeller design was making teachers and administrators complicit without their knowledge. Well-meaning educators implemented reforms they believed would help children, never realizing these reforms were designed to limit children’s potential. A teacher using foundation-created curricula genuinely wanted students to succeed—success had simply been redefined as accepting your designated role in the economic order.

By the 1950s, the transformation was so complete that Congressional investigations could barely comprehend what had happened. The Reece Committee found evidence of a deliberate agenda to collectivize American society through education, but the findings were dismissed as conspiracy theory. How could philanthropy be subversive? How could gifts have strings attached? The investigators were right but too late. The Rockefeller design had become the only design anyone could imagine.

The foundations’ own archives, which Iserbyt studied extensively, reveal they knew exactly what they were doing. Internal memos discuss “the importance of social control,” the need to “direct human evolution,” and strategies for “managing the dangerous classes.” They weren’t hiding their agenda—they were counting on a populace too well-schooled to recognize it.

From Citizens to Human Resources: The Workforce Pipeline

The transformation of students into “human resources” marks the complete industrialization of education. This shift in language from “children” and “students” to “human capital” and “workforce development” isn’t merely semantic—it represents the fundamental reconception of human beings as economic inputs rather than sovereign individuals. The U.S. Department of Education’s embrace of “lifelong learning” and “21st-century skills” masks a darker reality: the conversion of schools into workforce training centers for a managed economy.

The Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS), established in 1990, crystallized this transformation. Its report, “What Work Requires of Schools,” didn’t ask what children need to become fulfilled human beings or engaged citizens. It asked only what employers wanted from their workers. The answer became the new curriculum: compliance, teamwork, acceptance of authority, and just enough literacy to follow instructions but not enough to question them.

School-to-work programs, promoted heavily in the 1990s under both Republican and Democratic administrations, eliminated the pretense that education was about anything other than economic production. Students as young as fourteen were tracked into career paths, their courses determined by workforce projections rather than individual interests or aptitudes. A child who showed mechanical aptitude would be steered toward technical training, regardless of whether they dreamed of writing poetry. One who tested well would be pushed toward college, even if they wanted to work with their hands.

Iserbyt, working inside the Department of Education, watched this transformation accelerate through the 1980s. She documented how Soviet education methods, explicitly designed for a planned economy, were imported wholesale into American schools under the guise of “effective teaching strategies.” The similarities weren’t coincidental—both systems needed to produce predictable outputs for centrally managed economies. The U.S.-Soviet education agreements of 1985, signed by Reagan and Gorbachev, formalized this exchange of “pedagogical techniques” that treated children as products to be molded rather than individuals to be educated.

The language of manufacturing pervaded education reform. Students became “products,” teachers became “delivery systems,” and schools became “production units.” Quality control meant standardized testing. Efficiency meant larger class sizes and scripted curricula. Innovation meant finding cheaper ways to produce the same outcomes. The factory model that reformers claimed to oppose had actually conquered education completely—it just dressed in the language of reform.

Outcome-based education (OBE), promoted by William Spady and implemented nationwide in the 1990s, epitomized this industrial approach. Rather than teaching subjects, schools would produce “outcomes”—predetermined behaviors and attitudes that students must demonstrate. The outcomes always emphasized workplace skills and social attitudes over academic knowledge. A typical OBE goal might require students to “work effectively in diverse teams” or “adapt to changing conditions,” but never to think critically about why they should accept constant workplace surveillance or question who benefits from their adaptation.

The tech industry’s entry into education accelerated this transformation. Companies like IBM and Apple didn’t just sell computers to schools—they shaped curricula to produce the workers they needed. Computer literacy replaced classical literacy. Coding bootcamps replaced shop class. Students learned to interact with machines more fluently than with humans, preparing them for futures in cubicles interfacing with screens rather than communities.

Goals 2000 and America 2000, federal education initiatives that promised to make American students “first in the world in mathematics and science achievement,” actually subordinated all learning to economic competitiveness. The goal wasn’t educated citizens but competitive workers. When students learned science, it wasn’t to understand nature but to staff STEM industries. When they studied mathematics, it wasn’t to develop logical thinking but to fill engineering positions.

This workforce pipeline explains why schools obsess over college attendance rates while ignoring whether students actually learn anything in college. The credential matters more than the education because employers use degrees as sorting mechanisms, not indicators of knowledge. A bachelor’s degree signals that someone can tolerate four more years of institutional processing, making them suitable for cubicle work. Graduate degrees indicate even greater compliance capacity, qualifying holders for management positions where they’ll impose the same system on others.

The conversion of citizens into human resources serves multiple functions for those Gatto calls “the guardians of the system.” It ensures a compliant workforce that won’t organize effectively for better conditions. It creates insecure workers who compete against each other rather than cooperating for mutual benefit. Most importantly, it prevents people from imagining themselves as anything other than economic units, foreclosing possibilities for different ways of living and organizing society.

The Deliberately Dumbed Down: Methods and Outcomes

Charlotte Iserbyt’s meticulous documentation reveals that the dumbing down of America wasn’t accidental decline but deliberate policy, implemented through specific techniques designed to prevent critical thinking while maintaining the appearance of education. Her archive of government documents, foundation reports, and insider communications provides the smoking gun: they knew exactly what they were doing.

The assault on literacy came first and most decisively. The replacement of phonics with “whole word” or “look-say” reading methods in the 1920s and 1930s, funded by Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations, created an epidemic of functional illiteracy. Children who could have learned to read any word by sounding it out instead had to memorize thousands of word shapes like Chinese ideograms. Those who couldn’t—particularly boys and active learners—were labeled dyslexic or learning disabled, then shunted into special education where expectations dropped even lower.

Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld’s research, which Iserbyt cites extensively, showed that prior to these reforms, literacy was nearly universal among non-slave populations. After look-say methods took hold, reading problems exploded. By 1993, the National Adult Literacy Survey found 42 million Americans completely illiterate and another 50 million reading below fifth-grade level. This wasn’t failure—it was the intended outcome. As UNESCO’s “Toward World Understanding” stated explicitly, teaching children to read too well would make them resistant to social engineering.

Mathematics instruction followed a similar pattern. Traditional arithmetic—memorizing multiplication tables, learning algorithms, practicing computation—gave way to “new math” in the 1960s, then “whole math” in the 1990s. Students used calculators before understanding numbers, discussed mathematical concepts without mastering basic operations, and worked in groups where one student’s knowledge masked another’s ignorance. The result: cashiers who can’t make change, engineers who rely entirely on computers, and a population that accepts economic statistics without understanding their manipulation.

History disappeared entirely, replaced by “social studies” that severed children from their heritage. Instead of learning about the American Revolution, students did projects on “conflict resolution.” Rather than studying the Constitution, they participated in “consensus-building exercises.” The timeline of human achievement became a catalog of oppression, teaching children to despise their civilization rather than understand it. How can people defend freedoms they’ve never learned existed? How can they recognize tyranny they’ve been taught to call progress?

The methods for achieving this dumbing down came straight from behavioral psychology. B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning, imported wholesale into classrooms as “mastery learning,” treated children like laboratory rats. Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy, which sounds educational but actually derives from psychotherapy, focused on changing attitudes and values rather than transmitting knowledge. Every child became a patient, every classroom a therapy session, every teacher an unwitting psychologist modifying behavior toward predetermined outcomes.

Iserbyt documented how these methods were tested first in inner-city schools on minority populations, refined through experimentation on the powerless, then rolled out nationwide once perfected. Programs with names like “Outcomes-Based Education,” “Mastery Learning,” and “Direct Instruction” all used the same behavioral conditioning techniques: break learning into tiny fragments, reward compliance, punish deviation, never allow students to see the whole picture.

The computer revolution didn’t democratize education—it completed the conditioning process. Educational software tracks every keystroke, records every wrong answer, builds psychological profiles more detailed than any teacher could compile. Algorithms determine what students learn next, how fast they progress, what remediation they receive. The machine becomes the teacher, infinitely patient with compliance, infinitely intolerant of creativity.

The results are visible everywhere. College students who can’t write coherent paragraphs. Employees who can’t solve problems without step-by-step instructions. Citizens who can’t evaluate competing claims without fact-checkers. Voters who respond to emotional manipulation rather than logical argument. A population perfectly prepared for management by experts, incapable of the independent thought required for self-governance.

The most insidious aspect is that the dumbed-down don’t know they’re dumbed-down. They’ve been taught that their limitations are natural, their ignorance inevitable, their dependence necessary. They believe themselves educated because they possess credentials. They think themselves informed because they consume media. They consider themselves free because they can choose between approved options. The deliberate dumbing down succeeded not just in limiting what people know, but in eliminating their awareness that there’s anything else to know.

Conclusion: The Cost of Institutionalized Childhood

After twelve years of compulsory schooling, American children emerge having learned primarily how to respond to bells, how to request permission for bodily functions, and how to accept arbitrary authority. They’ve spent 15,000 hours in preparation for lives of compliance, their natural curiosity systematically extinguished, their capacity for independent thought deliberately atrophied. The cost cannot be measured merely in dollars or test scores but in human potential destroyed, imaginations stunted, and spirits broken.

Gatto calculated that students spend less than 100 hours actually learning to read, write, and compute—skills that motivated children can master in months, not years. The remaining thousands of hours serve no educational purpose. They habituate children to institutionalization, teaching them to depend on experts, to wait for instructions, to seek external validation, to never trust their own judgment. School extends childhood artificially into the twenties and beyond, creating perpetual adolescents who never achieve genuine maturity or independence.

The damage ripples through generations. Parents who were themselves schooled into compliance cannot model independent thinking for their children. Communities stripped of their educational authority lose the capacity for self-governance. Families scheduling their lives around school calendars, homework demands, and extracurricular activities have no time for the conversations, projects, and relationships that once transmitted culture and values. The very idea that parents might be their children’s primary educators seems radical, even irresponsible, to people convinced that only certified experts can teach.

Yet cracks appear in the edifice. The COVID-19 lockdowns of 2020 forced millions of parents to see what their children were actually learning—or not learning. Homeschooling, once considered fringe, gained mainstream acceptance as families discovered that children learn better without schools. The internet, despite its dangers, allows motivated learners to access knowledge that schools would never provide. Some young people are rejecting the college-to-cubicle pipeline entirely, creating their own paths outside institutional frameworks.

The solution isn’t reform—it’s replacement. No amount of tinkering can fix a system functioning exactly as designed. Adding computers won’t democratize education when the software embeds the same behavioral conditioning. Smaller classes won’t help when teachers are trained in the same methods. Higher standards mean nothing when the standard itself is compliance rather than thinking. Every reform extends the system’s reach while claiming to improve it.

Real education looks nothing like school. It happens when a child’s interest meets appropriate resources—books, tools, mentors, experiences. It requires time to think, freedom to fail, and permission to pursue tangents. It involves making real things, solving actual problems, and contributing to communities. It cannot be standardized, measured, or certified because each human being’s potential is unique, irreducible to institutional categories.

The path forward requires courage to reject what we’ve been conditioned to accept. Parents must reclaim their children’s education, even at financial and social cost. Communities must create alternatives to school that nurture rather than process children. Most difficult, adults must unlearn their own schooling, recovering capacities for independent thought and autonomous action that twelve years of institutionalization suppressed.

The architects of compulsory schooling succeeded beyond their dreams, creating a population so thoroughly schooled that they cannot imagine education without school, cannot conceive of children learning without curricula, cannot trust themselves to think without expert guidance. But human nature persists despite institutional processing. Children still wonder, still question, still resist—until school teaches them not to. That resistance, that natural curiosity and independence, is the seed from which genuine education can grow, if we have the courage to nurture it outside the shadow of institutional control.

Leave a comment

Share

I appreciate you being here.

If you’ve found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While 99% of everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I’m always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don’t hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com

Baseline Human Health

Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.


Subscribe to Lies are Unbekoming

Hundreds of paid subscribers

This Substack is a freely available, and searchable, public resource. With written interviews, book summaries, and deep dive conversations.

SOURCE

The Dimming: Exposing The Climate Engineering Cover-Up

From Geoengineering Watch

(Click on the image above to go to video @ Rumble.com)

https://www.GeoengineeringWatch.org
To support Geoengineering Watch: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/support/
Contact us: Dane Wigington, P.O. Box 9, Bella Vista, CA, 96008

Due to numerous requests to air The Dimming documentary on an independent platform from Youtube in the event that Youtube shuts us down, we are launching a slightly upgraded version of The Dimming on the Rumble platform. Please subscribe and follow this channel as a backup to GeoengineeringWatch.org videos.
Our skies are not the same, our weather is not the same, our world is not the same, climate chaos and catastrophe are now the norm. Covert climate engineering operations are wreaking havoc on already badly damaged climate systems around the world.
The ground breaking GeoengineeringWatch.org documentary “The Dimming” has reached a milestone of over 25 million views on YouTube as we enter 2025 in spite of ever more severe social media censorship. Hopefully with your help we can make many more aware of the threat posed by the ongoing climate engineering operations.
All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming, we must make every day count. Share credible data from a credible source, make your voice heard.
Dane Wigington

Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE and CLICK THE BELL to ensure you are notified of our new videos. https://www.youtube.com/@DaneWigington
To read or post comments on this video, please go directly to the article: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/the-dimming-revised-now-on-rumble/

To support Geoengineering Watch: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/support/
Contact us: Dane Wigington, P.O. Box 9, Bella Vista, CA, 96008

To receive Geoengineering Watch updates, please sign up for our mailing list: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/newsletter/

Geoengineering Watch t-shirts, cards and bumper stickers: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-t-shirts-cards-and-bumper-stickers/

Must view, THE DIMMING, the most comprehensive climate engineering documentary: https://youtu.be/rf78rEAJvhY

The Catastrophic Consequences Of Climate Engineering: https://youtu.be/kyxmrwbTKoM

To see firsthand film footage of the climate engineering impact on our forests and its vanishing inhabitants, view the new series: “Into The Wild, With Dane Wigington”: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwfFtDFZDpwvtAJ2yrKO3idEKDP3miLq9

In the attempt to answer as many questions as possible on the dire issue of climate engineering, Geoengineering Watch is producing a weekly “Climate Engineering News Q and A”: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwfFtDFZDpwsQyIUkWcYJzaarFt40K1KM By submitting a question to this email questions@geoengineeringwatch.org you are granting permission for your question and your first name to be read online. If you do not want your first name mentioned, please state that you wish to remain anonymous.

Geoengineering Watch has conducted our first ever high altitude particulate testing. Film footage of the flight and lab testing processes are featured in “The Dimming”, a groundbreaking documentary that is currently in production. This is a new 12+ minute insight segment on the upcoming film. https://youtu.be/4x3z35HA6JQ

This is a 4+ minute trailer of the groundbreaking documentary “The Dimming”: https://youtu.be/nT8OR1im-FA

The latest and most effective GeoengineeringWatch.org awareness raising materials can be found at the links below:
2 sided color glossy informational flyers: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ads/
20 page fact and photo summary booklets: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/climate-engineering-fact-and-photo-summary/
Geoengineering Watch t-shirts, cards and bumper stickers: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-t-shirts-cards-and-bumper-stickers/

To follow us on Facebook, click here:
https://www.facebook.com/dane.wigington.geoengineeringwatch.org
https://www.facebook.com/geoengineeringwatch.org
https://www.facebook.com/geoengineering.watch.photo.gallery/
https://www.facebook.com/TheDimming

To follow us on Twitter, click here:
https://twitter.com/GeoengineeringW
https://twitter.com/RealGeoEngWatch
https://twitter.com/GeoWatchGallery

To follow the latest GeoengineeringWatch.org videos please subscribe to our youtube channels below:
Dane Wigington https://www.youtube.com/@DaneWigington
The Dimming https://www.youtube.com/@TheDimming
Geoengineering Watch https://www.youtube.com/@GeoengineeringWatch
GeoengineeringWatch.org https://www.youtube.com/@GeoengineeringWatchOrg
Geo Watch https://www.youtube.com/@GeoWatch

TikTok:
https://www.tiktok.com/@danewigington/

Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/danewigington/

https://rumble.com/c/DaneWigington
https://www.t.me/danewigington

To view the locations and photo credits of the images shown, click here: https://www.facebook.com/geoengineering.watch.photo.gallery/

Our hope and goal is for this video to be forwarded far and wide. DO NOT re-upload any part of this copyrighted video.

IT’S GOING WAY TOO FAR: Making Life Less Human

From Dr Suneel Dhand

This week I had an experience that really drove home how crazily impersonal our world is becoming. I was at the airport, ready for an international flight—excited, optimistic, the usual sense of anticipation that frequently comes with travel. But what should have been a smooth start quickly turned into a frustrating reminder of how much we’ve lost in the name of “progress.”

I don’t know about you, but I absolutely hate not being able to deal with people anymore. Give me the good old days— when you’d arrive at the airport, greeted by a warm smile at check-in. A friendly agent would hand you your boarding pass, take your bag, maybe even wish you a good trip. That small but meaningful human interaction started your journey on the right note.

Not anymore.

These days, you’re greeted by machines. Cold, unfeeling screens that demand you scan, tap, and print your way to a boarding pass. I’d had some trouble checking in online, so I went up to what looked like a help area—only to be told there was no manual check-in counter anymore. “You can use the kiosk, sir,” the agent said, “but if you have trouble, there’s a staff member nearby who can assist.”

Fair enough, I thought. It’s annoying and the “staff member nearby” seemed busy and preoccupied.

After wrestling with the machine— which, for reasons known only to it, didn’t want to check me in initially— I finally got it to print my boarding pass and bag label. Then I had to drag my suitcase to another spot and personally scan and load it onto a conveyor belt. And mind you, I’m fairly tech-savvy! It wasn’t straightforward at all. Eventually, a staff member did appear to make sure the bag went through. That was the only moment of human contact in the entire process.

Barely an interaction.

It’s clear the philosophy is: check-in, print passes, load your own large bag— click button to send to airplane.

It would have been so much easier with a real person at a check-in desk. Someone who could have sorted it out in seconds, offered a smile, and sent me on my way feeling cared for—not just processed.

But this is the way everything is going.

You’ve seen it at grocery stores too—fewer cashiers, more self-checkout machines. Some people don’t mind, but there’s no denying we’re losing something deeper here: connection, empathy, the simple feeling that another human being is there to help you.

Let’s call it what it is: this is a total loss of human interaction.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m no Luddite! You’re reading this newsletter right now— and you watch my videos— because of modern technology. Tech can be amazing when used wisely. But we’ve crossed a line. Convenience has taken priority over humanity. Efficiency has replaced empathy.

And this is what really worries me: the same thing is creeping fast into healthcare.

Healthcare, by its nature, is one of the most personal fields there is. When you’re sick, anxious, or scared, you don’t want to be “processed.” You want to be seen, heard, and understood. But look at what’s happening:

  • Online portals are replacing conversations with your doctor.
  • Chatbots answer questions once handled by nurses.
  • AI algorithms are determining which patients get appointments or tests first.
  • And some clinics even encourage patients to do self-checks of vitals and symptoms before a doctor ever lays eyes on them.

This conveyor-belt mentality might make spreadsheets look efficient— but it’s destroying the essence of medicine. Healing doesn’t come from screens or software. It comes from human beings who care enough to listen, to look you in the eye, to truly understand your story.

Machines can process data, but they can’t offer reassurance. They can’t pick up subtle cues in your voice or expression. They can’t show compassion.

And if we lose that human touch, we lose the heart of healthcare itself.

The same goes for society at large. Every time we automate away an interaction, we erode something fundamental about being human. Progress isn’t just about speed—it’s about meaning.

So here’s my plea: let’s not sleepwalk into a world that’s frictionless but soulless. Let’s hold on to what makes life feel real— the eye contact, the shared laughter, the empathy. Technology should make our lives better, not emptier.

Because at the end of the day, no app, no kiosk, no chatbot will ever replace a warm smile that says: I’m here to help you.

Best Regards,


Dr. Suneel Dhand

Personal website: www.drsuneeldhand.com

Ojais Wellness USA: www.ojaiswellness.com

Ojais Wellness UK/Europe: www.ojaiswellness.co

SOURCE

Image by Rudy and Peter Skitterians from Pixabay

Microsoft Adds Facial Recognition Feature To OneDrive, But Can Only Be Disabled Three Times A Year (So They Say)

“People section: One Drive uses AI to recognize faces in your photos to help you find photos of friends and family. You can only change this setting 3 times a year.”

From The WinePress @ substack

Microsoft continues to force new features that cannot be easily bypassed or turned off. Following the company’s decision to close a loophole that no longer allows users to create local analog accounts, but now rather must create an online-active Microsoft account, Microsoft is now forcing facial recognition to use its popular OneDrive app – a cloud storage and synchronization app.

Strangely, the latest update says this function can only be turned off three times a year, so Microsoft says.

“People section: One Drive uses AI to recognize faces in your photos to help you find photos of friends and family. You can only change this setting 3 times a year.”

Windows Central explains:

On the Microsoft Support website, the company describes the feature as “collecting, using, and storing facial scans and biometric information from your photos through the OneDrive app for facial grouping technologies … When you turn off this feature in your OneDrive settings, all facial grouping data will be permanently removed within 30 days.”

Microsoft is also quick to highlight that the feature is never used to train AI models, and the data collected is only ever used to help improve the feature for the individual user that has enabled it. Face data is never shared outside of your account. “Microsoft does not use any of your facial scans and biometric information to train or improve the AI model overall. Any data you provide is only used to help triage and improve the results of your account, no one else’s.”

AI face recognition in OneDrive is a feature that has been rolling out for quite some time, and it appears to be enabled by default when it does eventually reach you. It’s still in limited preview, so not all users will see it just yet, but it is concerning that the support webpage for the feature seems to imply that the feature can only be enabled or disabled three times a year, even if that’s not the case.

READ AT THE LINK

Photo credit: pixabay.com

The Truth About Saturated Fat (Mercola)

Heart

From Dr Joseph Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • For several decades, saturated fat was wrongly blamed for heart disease, while vegetable oils quietly caused a surge in obesity, inflammation, and chronic metabolic disorders
  • Newly appointed FDA commissioner Dr. Marty Makary is now leading efforts to revise outdated dietary guidelines that were built on cherry-picked data from Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study
  • A 2016 BMJ-published reanalysis found replacing saturated fat with linoleic acid-rich vegetable oils increased cardiovascular deaths, despite lowering cholesterol
  • Investigative journalist Dr. Maryanne Demasi faced vicious backlash after exposing the flawed science behind saturated fat demonization in her documentary “Heart of the Matter”
  • Industrial seed oils like canola and soybean are now linked to mitochondrial damage, inflammation, and chronic illness — while saturated fat is finally being recognized as metabolically supportive

For decades, the dominant narrative insisted that saturated fat was deadly — even though the actual data never proved it. As a result, the health advice shifted toward seed oils and processed margarine, which quietly ushered in new health problems, from metabolic disease to obesity and inflammatory disorders — all while the original hypothesis remained unchallenged by mainstream medicine.

Now, for the first time, high-ranking officials are openly criticizing these outdated guidelines. So, if you still believe that butter, beef, and full-fat cheese clog your arteries and are damaging your health, it’s time to relearn everything you know about these fat sources.

New FDA Commissioner Aims to End the 70-Year War on Saturated Fat

On July 14, 2025, Dr. Marty Makary, the newly appointed U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner, along with Sec. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. of the Department of Health and Human Services and Sec. Brooke Rollins of the Department of Agriculture, held a press conference addressing their plans to significantly overhaul the U.S. dietary guidelines.1

•One of the primary areas that they will work on is revising the guidelines on saturated fat — During the press conference, Makary highlighted how the changes to the food guidelines will be made based on scientific findings. He mentions that the demonization of saturated fat began with a flawed study — the Seven Countries Study by Ancel Keys.

•Why the Seven Countries Study was significantly flawed — The study, which started in 1958 and continued until 1983, explored the heart health of different populations in several prominent Western countries. According to Keys’ hypothesis, there is a significant link between saturated fat and heart disease. When he published his data, it showed perfect correlations between cardiovascular disease and the dietary consumption of fat.2

However, there was just one problem with the research — Keys cherry-picked the data. He selectively chose the countries that fit his hypothesis while ignoring data from 16 other countries that went against his recommendations.3 Had he chosen a different set of countries, the data would have been the opposite — that increasing the percent of calories from fat actually reduces the number of deaths from coronary heart disease.

•Despite the methodological flaws in his data, the medical community accepted Keys’ study — This led to the promulgation of “low-fat, low-cholesterol” foods as healthy. Butter, coconut oil, red meat, dairy, and eggs were all shunned, while polyunsaturated fats (PUFs) like margarine, vegetable oils, and shortening were popularized.

•The medical establishment “locked arms and walked off a cliff together” — This was how Makary described the shift from saturated fat to polyunsaturated fat — basically, the health community back then took a look and decided that Keys’s study was gospel truth — despite many experts contesting his hypothesis and many studies4,5 showing the opposite.

“The medical establishment started with a robust debate in the New England Journal of Medicine among academics of the National Academy. But that debate ended in the 1970s because there was groupthink,” Makary said.

“Well, that dogma still lives large and you see remnants of it in the food guidelines that we are now revising. So, we’re going to ensure that the new guidelines are based on science and not medical dogma.”6

To see the tide finally turning and the government health agencies taking the lead on these monumental changes is something I applaud. Over the past couple of decades, I’ve published countless articles about the flaws in Keys’ study — and why saturated fats are not to be feared, as they are actually integral to your health.

Documentary Exposed the Flaws and Received Fierce Backlash

Just like me, Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., has been speaking out about the erroneous demonization of saturated fat for a long time. Several years ago, I wrote about a two-part documentary she produced called “Heart of the Matter,” which aired on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s show (ABC) Catalyst in 2014. I was extremely impressed by the film, as it did an excellent job of exposing the cholesterol/saturated fat myths and its financially links to cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins.

In her recent Substack post, Demasi detailed the severe backlash she received after she released the documentary, and her thoughts on these recent developments from the U.S. government agencies. “It was a stunning moment — not because the criticism was new, but because it was coming from someone in an official position to do something,” she said.7

•“Heart of the Matter” focused on two primary points — The first part examined the demonization of saturated fat, while the second part dwelled on the widespread use of statins.

“The medical dogma was firmly entrenched: saturated fat raised cholesterol, and cholesterol caused heart disease. But the science behind it was shaky — built on cherry-picked data and upheld more by consensus than by critical evaluation,” she said.

•The findings were supported by some of the top experts in the field of cardiovascular health — Among the interviewees featured were Dr. Michael Eades, an early advocate for low-carb, high-fat diets, cardiologists Dr. Stephen Sinatra and Dr. Ernest Curtis, nutritionist Dr. Jonny Bowden, and science journalist Gary Taubes. All of these experts voiced their concerns regarding the warnings against saturated fat. Demasi said:

“Eades, for instance, highlighted the absurdity of the prevailing narrative: ‘You very seldom see the words ‘saturated fat’ in the public press when they’re not associated with artery clogging. So it’s like it’s all one term — ‘artery clogging saturated fats.’’

And Taubes, author of Good Calories Bad Calories, known for his meticulous dismantling of diet dogma, cut to the core: ‘There’s no compelling evidence that saturated fat is involved in heart disease.’”

To present both sides equally, the documentary also featured experts who vigorously defended the warnings against saturated fat. Robert Grenfell, the director of the National Heart Foundation, and Professor David Sullivan, a cardiologist, shared their thoughts in the film.

•Still, the backlash was overwhelming — Demasi describes it as “immediate, vicious, and unrelenting.” The media not only turned against her, but they also went against the experts who challenged the saturated fat dogma. And even though no factual inaccuracies were found, ABC still pulled both episodes from its website.

Save This Article for Later – Get the PDF Now

Download PDF

Numerous Experts Have Sounded the Alarm on Keys’ Flawed Research

The fact that Ancel Keys’ hypothesis was purely observational and could not establish causation has long been raised by many health experts — even during the first years when the Seven Countries study came out. According to Demasi, John Yudkin, a British physiologist and nutritionist warned that sugar, not fat, was the real cause of heart disease. However, he was mocked and marginalized by Keys, who considered Yudkin his fiercest opponent.8

Yudkin was the first, but he wasn’t the only one — numerous researchers like Uffe Ravnskov and Malcolm Kendrick, also publicly challenged Keys’ hypothesis, co-authoring publications that exposed the flaws of this study. Many others soon followed, which Demasi outlined in her blog post.

•“Saturated fat is not the major issue” — In 2013, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra published a commentary on the BMJ, saying that the flawed advice from Keys caused people to aggressively lower cholesterol — which may have led to higher rates of heart disease.

“The mantra that saturated fat must be removed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease has dominated dietary advice and guidelines for almost four decades. Yet scientific evidence shows that this advice has, paradoxically, increased our cardiovascular risks,” Malhotra wrote.9

•”The Big Fat Surprise” — Nina Teicholz wrote her best-selling exposè in 2014,10 which helped bring the issue to public attention. Her deeply researched book challenged the conventional wisdom on dietary fats, especially saturated fat. “Teicholz documented how weak science, political pressure, and food industry lobbying created a false consensus that demonised fat and distorted public health policy,” Demasi remarked.11

•“Re-evaluation of the traditional diet-heart hypothesis” — In 2016, a group of researchers published a landmark re-analysis of the Minnesota Coronary Experiment in the BMJ, to evaluate the accuracy of Keys hypothesis. They found that when saturated fat was replaced with linoleic acid (LA) from vegetable oils, cholesterol levels were lowered — but paradoxically led to an increase in deaths, particularly from cardiovascular disease.

“Findings from the Minnesota Coronary Experiment add to growing evidence that incomplete publication has contributed to overestimation of the benefits of replacing saturated fat with vegetable oils rich in linoleic acid,” the researchers concluded.12

The Cholesterol Hypothesis Is a ‘Professional Litmus Test’

The plans to overhaul the U.S. dietary guidelines give hope to many researchers like Demasi, who have long raised their concerns about this flawed science — but were ostracized as a result.

“For the first time, real change may be coming — not from the margins, but from the very top of the U.S. health establishment…

It’s taken decades. The cholesterol hypothesis wasn’t just a scientific claim — it became a professional litmus test. To challenge it was to risk your funding, your career, your credibility. Many of us paid that price. Even now, entrenched interests remain,” she wrote.

•But why was the myth allowed to persist in the first place? Apparently, it’s all because of the food and drug industry. In a video podcast, Dr. Paul Saladino and Teicholz discussed how the low-fat, low-cholesterol myth rapidly led to dramatic changes in the food and drug industries — changes that have proven to be highly lucrative, financially speaking.13

•Acknowledging that saturated fat is healthy means to relinquish big industry profits — The Big Food industry is raking in millions of dollars from the low-fat and low-cholesterol (yet highly processed) foods, including industrial vegetable oils. To admit that these “healthier options” are actually decimating public health would lead to great financial losses. The healthy alternative is real food — however, there’s no big industry profits to be made from that.

•Moreover, statin sales and other Big Pharma profit areas would suffer — The whole point of prescribing statins was to lower cholesterol, but if the notion that cholesterol is bad would be overturned, then what would be the point of taking these drugs?

Personally, I believe that statins are among the most overprescribed — and unnecessary — medications on the market today. Not only do the harms far outweigh the benefits, but they’re also ineffective. In fact, in “Heart of the Matter,” the experts repeatedly say that statins only lengthen a life by a few days and, despite their hype and popularity, are shockingly ineffective for all but a few people. Learn more about these drugs in my article, “Statins Do More Harm Than Good.”

Vegetable Oils Undermine Your Health

Perhaps the worst effect of the demonization of saturated fats — including butter, tallow, lard, and coconut oil — is that it paved the way for vegetable oils like soybean, canola, and corn oil, which are loaded with linoleic acid, a polyunsaturated fat (PUF), to become a standard part of the modern diet.

Today, Americans consume LA at levels that would have been unimaginable a century ago. In the 1860s, we only consumed 2 grams of LA per day; that number has now increased to close to 30 grams per day for most people. It now makes up 15% to 25% of a typical American’s caloric intake. And the cost of this overload? Your cells become more vulnerable to oxidative stress.

•Excessive LA causes your mitochondria to break down — The mitochondria, which are the powerhouse of your cells, responsible for creating energy, are significantly damaged because of this fat. LA transforms into oxidized linoleic acid metabolites (OXLAMs), dangerous byproducts that damage DNA, disrupt energy production, and drive chronic inflammation throughout your body.

OXLAMs have been linked to not just heart disease, but nearly every chronic disease now plaguing the developed world, such as obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and even neurodegeneration.

•LA stays in your body for years — You don’t simply eliminate it; instead, it LA embeds in your body fat, where it continues to inflict damage even after you clean up your diet. I recommend reading my paper published in Nutrients to understand how this happens — and how you can reverse it. My paper also expounds on the long-term biological effects of this metabolic disruptor.

View the Full Study Here

•Unfortunately, LA is rampant in the food supply — Even if you stop using seed oils, or don’t eat fried foods and fast food, you could still end up eating large amounts of LA mainly because it’s cleverly hidden in so many packaged products where you’d least expect it.

Lowering your intake of industrial seed oils starts with knowing where they hide. I recommend downloading my Health Coach app, which will be out soon. It has a unique feature called Seed Oil Sleuth™, which will help identify every hidden source of seed oils in your meals. It also calculates your daily LA intake to the nearest tenth of a gram.

Saturated Fat Is Not the Enemy — Misinformation Is

So how do you undo the damage of 70 years of misguided health policy? The good news is there are ways to help revert the damage, and it starts by focusing on the root cause — removing industrial seed oils loaded with linoleic acid (LA). Carefully read labels, even in so-called “healthy” snacks; remember, these harmful fats are lurking everywhere.

Once you’ve cleaned up all the unhealthy fats in your diet, start rebuilding your health with saturated fats from clean animal sources, which are stable and nourishing. Choose healthy options like grass fed butter, ghee, beef tallow, and coconut oil, which support your mitochondria, don’t oxidize easily, and provide steady energy. For more healthy lifestyle strategies to eliminate LA from your diet, I recommend reading “Linoleic Acid, Mitochondria, Gut Microbiome, and Metabolic Health — A Mechanistic Review.”

These new developments in the U.S. food supply are certainly a breath of fresh air, and if Makary and others who are part of the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) campaign follow through, we may finally get dietary guidelines that reflect biological truth, not industry agendas. As Demasi concludes:

“[W]e may finally be seeing the collapse of one of the most destructive public health myths in modern history … For those of us who’ve waited decades, it’s not vindication we want (although that would be nice) — it’s change.”14

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the War on Saturated Fat

Q: Why is the war on saturated fat finally ending?

A: For decades, saturated fat was wrongly blamed for heart disease due to flawed research like Ancel Keys’ Seven Countries Study. Now, top U.S. health officials, including FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, are acknowledging these mistakes and working to revise the dietary guidelines based on current science, not outdated dogma.

Q: What was wrong with the original research that demonized saturated fat?

A: Keys’ study selectively included countries that supported his hypothesis and ignored those that didn’t. This cherry-picking created a false link between fat and heart disease, leading to widespread promotion of low-fat, high-seed oil diets that have been harmful to public health.

Q: How have vegetable oils impacted health since replacing saturated fats?

A: Vegetable oils like soybean, corn, and canola are loaded with linoleic acid (LA), which damages mitochondria, promotes inflammation, and contributes to chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and neurodegeneration. These oils now make up 15% to 25% of caloric intake in the average American diet.

Q: What role did media and government play in spreading misinformation?

A: Mainstream media and government agencies endorsed and enforced the cholesterol hypothesis without fully examining the evidence. Whistleblowers like Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., were attacked for speaking out, and even accurate documentaries were censored to protect the status quo.

Q: What changes are being proposed for the U.S. dietary guidelines?

A: Upcoming revisions may eliminate the cap on saturated fat and elevate full-fat foods like butter and dairy. Officials aim to base the guidelines on actual science, not outdated industry-driven dogma.

SOURCE

The real reason they are culling your animals – it’s multi layered

A repost of this important info, introducing an article from Jenese James. It makes some sense of the massive killing sprees of wildlife with poisons, particularly down under in ‘guinea pig’ NZ. Sprees that are inconsistent with the ‘sustainable’ and ‘conservation’ mantras. Read on…


Just this week the UK Telegraph has been warning us of the next possible plandemic, with their eye this time on your pet cat that might be putting us all in danger:

Experts have long regarded pigs as one of the greatest zoonotic threats to public health because their cells allow viruses to mix and mutate, creating new strains capable of causing human pandemics. This is how the 2008/09 H1N1 swine flu pandemic started and it is suspected that pigs in Haskell country, Kansas may have triggered the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic which is estimated to have killed between 50 and 100 million people. Now a new study suggests that pet cats could be just as dangerous – and could provide the bridge that allows H5N1 bird flu to mutate and jump to humans.

We should be very afraid and be looking to getting rid of our pets, or so they’d have us believe. Meanwhile the Guardian is hyping it up by warning all pregnant women who contract bird flu will die!

They’ve actually been targeting cats in NZ and elsewhere for some time now.

NZ’s Tokoroa is hiring a shooter to cull feral cats – watch out for your cat

1080 to be used by Aussie govt to kill 2 million feral cats using aerially dropped 1080-laced sausages

We’ve also been targeting possums, deer, birds, rabbits, tahr and other animals considered by our conservation authorities to be pests. 

READ AT THE LINK

https://truthwatchnz.is/all-categories/agenda-21-30/drumming-up-bird-flu-targeting-your-pets

Glyphosate Found in Eggs, Chicken Sold in Grocery Stores Traced to GMO Poultry Feed

Note: some years back (at least 6) I inquired of two NZ companies that produced chickens and pork, whether they fed their produce GM feed. Both replied they couldn’t rule that out as the feed was not labeled GM. EWNZ

Posted on Sep 10 2025 – by Sustainable Pulse

A scientific review in World’s Poultry Science Journal highlights the adverse health effects on avian species from exposure to the widely used weedkiller glyphosate (Roundup) throughout the process of poultry production. The herbicide enters the poultry production system through residues in genetically engineered feed, Beyond Pesticides reported.

An earlier article in Scientific Reports concludes that glyphosate’s (GLP) “widespread application on feed crops leaves residues in the feed,” while residues are “found to be common in conventional eggs acquired from grocery stores.”

In analyzing the biochemical, toxicological and ecological impacts of glyphosate on poultry, particularly chickens, the authors find a wide body of evidence linking glyphosate and its metabolite (breakdown product) aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) to debilitating hazards that extend beyond mortality.

These sublethal effects include disruption of the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal disease; decreased productivity and diminished reproductive health; hepatic and kidney toxicity; growth and developmental impacts, including teratogenicity and embryotoxicity; endocrine disruption and oxidative stress; and impaired immune functions.

The effects of glyphosate, as have long been documented in the scientific literature, range from negative impacts on biodiversity and the environment to food safety risks and human health implications.

Glyphosate Box

Glyphosate Residue Free Certification for Food Brands – Click Here

Test Your Food and Water at Home for Glyphosate – Click Here

Test Your Hair for Glyphosate and other Pesticides – Click Here to Find Our Your Long-Term Exposure

Residues of both glyphosate and AMPA “have been detected in soil, crops, animal feed, poultry, and water sources, prompting scrutiny of their long-term effects,” the authors state.

They continue:

“Studies indicate that glyphosate disrupts enzymatic pathways, particularly by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system, leading to oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and mitochondrial dysfunction.

“It has been linked to liver and kidney toxicity, gut microbiota alterations, reproductive harm, developmental defects, and possible carcinogenicity, though regulatory agencies remain divided on its classification as a carcinogen.”

The International Agency for Research on Cancer, a part of the World Health Organization, has classified glyphosate as having cancer-causing properties, as have independent peer-reviewed scientific studies.

The ubiquitous nature of glyphosate residues throughout the environment and within organisms is a result of the widespread application of this toxic chemical in forestry, agriculture, landscaping and gardening.

Over 750 herbicides contain glyphosate as the active ingredient, and it also plays a large role in the production of genetically modified (GM) crops, “with approximately 80% of GM crops bred specifically for GLP tolerance.”

Glyphosate-based herbicide formulations contain not only glyphosate but also other inert (undisclosed) ingredients, such as adjuvants that increase toxicity.

A common adjuvant in glyphosate-based herbicide products is polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA), which researchers have found can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.

Effects on poultry

Glyphosate residues in animal feed, as well as in water and through other exposure routes, pose risks to both animal and human health, as these residues can bioaccumulate and biomagnify throughout the food chain.

With a high reliance on corn and soybeans in the diets of poultry, GM crops are a significant source of exposure for these animals.

“The presence of GLP residues in poultry feed raises concerns about potential health effects on birds, including disruptions in gut microbiota, oxidative stress, and overall productivity,” the authors write.

They continue:

“Globally, approximately 57% of maize grain and 85% of soybean production are directed towards animal feed. Several studies have investigated the effects of feeding glyphosate-tolerant GM crops to various livestock species.

“Research has included dairy cows, cattle, and chickens, highlighting the potential impact of glyphosate residues on poultry growth performance, immune function, and reproductive health.”

Hepatic and kidney toxicity

Studies show that the kidney and liver are among the first organs to be affected by alimentary poisoning/foodborne illness. Additional research shows glyphosate residues in food can then impact various systems in animals, including the liver, intestine, kidney, and lung, as well as alter enzyme activity.

In a study of hatched chickens exposed to glyphosate alone and in Roundup shows “histopathological alterations in the kidneys and liver, along with imbalances in serum parameters and various biochemical changes in these organs, which could potentially impair their function.”

Oxidative stress

Exposure to glyphosate can induce oxidative stress and lipid, protein, and DNA damage. Previous research shows how glyphosate and AMPA are genotoxic and linked to oxidative damage.

One study shows that glyphosate increases the generation of reactive oxygen species in the liver and small intestine of chickens. Chronic exposure to products containing glyphosate in broiler breeders (stock chickens) weakens eggshells and delays embryo organ growth, with oxidative stress as the cause.

Gastrointestinal toxicity

Glyphosate diminishes the bioavailability of cytochrome (CYP) enzymes, which are crucial for metabolism, in the organs of chickens. One study shows that glyphosate specifically inhibits CYP P450 enzymes in chickens’ livers and small intestines.

Chicks exposed to glyphosate also have compromised liver function and altered lipid metabolism, further causing oxidative stress and deposits of fat in blood and liver tissues due to heightened expression of lipogenesis-related genes, as a result of its disruptive effect on cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Additional studies show disruption of the gut microbiome in livestock and poultry, where glyphosate reduces beneficial bacteria and enhances resistance in pathogenic strains.

These impacts can lead to the onset of chronic gastrointestinal diseases. In a study of the intestinal structure of chicks, glyphosate has been shown to impair the intestines, reduce antioxidant capacity, induce inflammation and cause the downregulation of genes in the small intestine.

Impact on reproduction

Previous research shows that chronic exposure to herbicides containing glyphosate can impact the survival, growth, activity and reproduction of organisms, including chickens.

study of roosters with chronic, subtoxic exposure to glyphosate shows reduced plasma testosterone and a decline in their reproductive peak.

Another study finds “significant effect on the histopathological [diseased tissue] characteristics of the rooster testes as well as sperm motility, the key determinant of rooster sperm quality.”

Additional research shows altered sperm in roosters when fed a diet containing glyphosate that leads to “metabolic disorders in the offspring, most likely due to epigenetic effects.”

Glyphosate implications for productivity and performance

Several studies have classified glyphosate-based herbicide formulations as teratogenic, causing developmental abnormalities in a fetus or embryo, and embryotoxic, causing harm or death to embryos during development.

In a study of quails, glyphosate was found to accumulate inside the eggs, causing damage to lipids (fats) in the brains of the developing embryos. This study also reveals that residues of glyphosate in food also slow plumage development and linger in eggs, muscles and livers of the birds.

Another study of chickens shows “exposure to GLP led to a significant reduction in the expression of key productivity-related genes.”

Exposure directly in the eggs of chickens to glyphosate-based herbicides induces teratogenic effects with negative effects on embryonic growth and development, as well as embryo mortality.

Changes in blood parameters, adverse effects on digestive tract development and reduced body weight are noted in chickens exposed to glyphosate.

Reproductive and developmental impacts regarding eggshell quality and embryo development are also associated with levels of both glyphosate and AMPA within egg yolk.

Yet another study shows that a decline in hatchability is associated with higher levels of glyphosate residues in feed among broiler breeders.

Regulatory deficiencies and the organic solution

Despite mounting scientific evidence that continues to link glyphosate to adverse effects in a wide range of species, current regulations fail to protect health and the environment.

The regulatory processes, such as those utilized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), also ignore factors that enhance the toxicity of these already harmful chemicals, such as synergy, mixtures and inert ingredients.

“Current safety evaluations mostly concentrate on glyphosate in isolation, overlooking the synergistic toxic effects of commercial formulations and their capacity for bioaccumulation in adipose tissues,” the authors point out.

They continue:

“Furthermore, the heightened toxicity of commercial glyphosate formulations, influenced by co-formulants such as POEA, in conjunction with glyphosate’s interference with gut microbiota, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and endocrine functions, emphasises the necessity for cumulative risk assessments and long-term studies that account for species variability, bioaccumulation, and synergistic effects.”

These inadequacies in the regulation of petrochemical pesticides and synthetic fertilizers support the urgent need for the widespread adoption of safer alternatives.

SOURCE

Image by Franz W. from Pixabay

What DOC doesn’t want you to know about 1080 Poison (leaked report from 2014)

Another repost from 2016… EWNZ

Kiwi farmers are still poisoning their fields with a Bayer/Monsanto product that has involved multi billion dollar settlements

Travelling about the NZ countryside recently I noticed the familiar yellow fields I used to think were attractive. Until I discovered they’d been sprayed with Roundup, the herbicide that farmers tell me, is so harmless you could drink it.

glyphosate sprayed fields
Manawatu field sprayed with Herbicide

Sounds a bit like the ‘safe and effective’ mantra. Well it turns out Roundup is far from either of those terms. Why will farmers not read the independent research? Or follow the precautionary principle. Any doubt whatsoever about safety? wait until it is proven safe.

Roundup is manufactured by Bayer (formerly Monsanto… read their history … who have morphed into oblivion) and one of its ingredients so harmful to us all is glyphosate. There is a ton of independent research now (including law suits) that should make you avoid it at all costs. US Legal firm Wisner Baum helped negotiate over $11 billion in settlements against Bayer, securing multi-billion dollar jury verdicts for its clients. They state at their website:

Roundup is a widely used herbicide whose active ingredient is glyphosate. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) — part of the World Health Organization — classifies glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. Thousands of people across the U.S. have alleged that long‑term exposure to glyphosate (in Roundup and similar products) caused them to develop non‑Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other serious illnesses.

A NZ tertiary agricultural textbook has long instructed farmers to spray Roundup on their fields then plow it under. The text book is called Pasture Doctor and can be found on Amazon here. (Small wonder farmers still think it’s safe. Why would the University lie to them? ) There used to be a preview option of that book from which I screenshot the pages recommending spraying, however that option has now disappeared. (I lost the screenshots some time ago unfortunately). Of note, it was a University lecturer who told me in the 1980s that corporations would one day control governments. Predictive programming at its finest.

Prof Seralini's experiment with glyphosate and rats
The Seralini Rats

Professor Seralini (from France) conducted a two year experiment (2011) examining glyphosate and GMO food, his team fed transgenic corn to lab rats that produced in them multiple tumours. But of course Monsanto produced ‘evidence’ claiming the rats they used were the wrong kind, casting aspersions on the whole study. (Refuted here). Wiki predictably called it the Seralini ‘affair’. I would prefer to believe the Professor any day. You can watch the 12 minute Seralini video below. There is a transcript at the source on YouTube.

A French court ruled in 2009 that Monsanto has lied about the safety of Roundup (ie it is not biodegradable as claimed, a bit like the claims made about deadly 1080). 

US Tertiary level lecturer of 55 years experience in agriculture, Professor Emeritus of Plant Pathology (Dr Don Hubert) calls Glyphosate one of the most toxic substances on the planet.

The Physicians & Scientists for Global Responsibility (PSGR) supply a long list of research citing concerns about glyphosate here.

Hear also, NZ’s Dr Meriel Watts speaking on glyphosate.

“We don’t want to wait until we have exposed enough people to a chemical in order to prove that it’s carcinogenic. When we hit that point, we have hit a failure in the regulatory process.” – Dr. Lynn Goldman,
National Research Council Report Review Committee Member

glyphosate spraying on fields in nz
Many Councils in NZ spray the roadsides with glyphosate. (Photo credit: Marian Sutherland)

For some time I and other interested folk appealed to the local Rangitikei District Council asking them to drop the use of glyphosate/Roundup on Council lands, streets, parks and so on. There were some concessions made about signage warning the public of spraying and so on but as to ceasing altogether they declined. There was evidence cited of the use of steam in Auckland to combat weeds which was only minimally dearer than Roundup. No go. I approached a person spraying for Council one time and asked why he didn’t wear protective clothing as recommended by the manufacturer. He told me he didn’t want to scare the public.

To educate yourself on the long list of studies and the experts who have spoken out against glyphosate and Roundup check out these pages (glyphosate is in other herbicides as well, check the labels, and consider organic alternatives if you must spray) :

Glyphosate

Glyphosate/GMO videos

Glyphosate Toxicity: What You Need to Know

Links between Glyphosate and a Multitude of Cancers that are “Reaching Epidemic Proportions” from GlobalResearch.ca

Search in ‘categories’ for ‘glyphosate’ (categories is found at the top left hand side of the news page). Alternatively type glyphosate into the search box (top right hand side).

From Tobacco to Vaccines: the Playbook Perfected

From Unbekoming @ Substack

In December 1953, tobacco executives gathered at the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan to confront an existential crisis. The scientific evidence linking cigarettes to lung cancer was becoming undeniable. From this meeting emerged what would become known as the Frank Statement—a masterpiece of manufactured doubt that appeared in 448 newspapers reaching 43 million Americans. “We believe the products we make are not injurious to health,” they declared, announcing the creation of the Tobacco Industry Research Committee. This wasn’t mere denial; it was the birth of industrialized epistemic capture.

The tobacco industry’s genius wasn’t in refuting science but in corrupting it from within. They created their own research institutes, funded friendly scientists, ghostwrote papers, and transformed medical journals into marketing vehicles. They manufactured a “controversy” where none existed, keeping their product on the market for decades after its dangers were known. By the time of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement, tobacco had killed millions while generating trillions in profits.

Yet tobacco’s playbook, brilliant as it was, contained a fatal flaw: addiction itself became evidence of harm. Smokers trying to quit, yellowed teeth, blackened lungs—the damage was visible, undeniable, personal. The industry could delay recognition but never prevent it entirely. They created customers who defended their addiction but ultimately knew they were addicts.

Pharmaceutical companies studying this model recognized both its power and its limitations. What if, instead of selling a product that visibly harms, you sold one that prevents invisible future harm? What if, instead of creating addicts who might someday want to quit, you created true believers who would enforce the product on others? What if the customers themselves became your most passionate marketers, your most vigilant police, your most faithful evangelists?

The transformation from tobacco’s playbook to vaccine orthodoxy represents an evolution in control so perfect that those trapped within it will violently defend their imprisonment. Where tobacco created dependence, vaccines create devotion. Where cigarettes generated customers, vaccines generate congregations. The innovation wasn’t just in the product but in the systematic transformation of medicine into theology, patients into prophets, and public health into public faith.

The Tobacco Template

The Brown & Williamson documents, leaked in 1994, revealed the architecture of deception in stunning detail. “Doubt is our product,” wrote one executive, “since it is the best means of competing with the ‘body of fact’ that exists in the minds of the general public.” The strategy was elegant: you don’t need to prove your product safe, merely maintain enough uncertainty to prevent action. Fund research that asks the wrong questions. Create institutes with academic-sounding names. Transform “no evidence of harm” into “evidence of no harm.”

The Tobacco Institute, founded in 1958, perfected the art of institutional capture. They didn’t just buy scientists; they bought entire departments. Harvard’s tobacco-friendly research wasn’t corruption—it was investment. The Council for Tobacco Research distributed over $282 million to 1,000 scientists at 350 institutions. They created what historian Robert Proctor calls “agnotology”—the deliberate production of ignorance. Studies examined everything except what mattered. Research into genetic predisposition to cancer, the role of personality in disease, atmospheric pollution—anything to deflect from cigarettes as the cause.

Most brilliantly, they corrupted language itself. “Safe cigarettes” became “reduced harm products.” “Addiction” became “habituation.” “Cancer-causing” became “statistical association.” They pioneered what Orwell predicted: controlling language to control thought. When Philip Morris’s own research showed cigarettes were carcinogenic, they classified it as “privileged attorney-client communication,” hiding science behind legal doctrine.

The pharmaceutical industry observed this infrastructure and recognized its potential. But where tobacco had to build its scientific apparatus from scratch, pharma could colonize existing institutions. Medical schools already existed; they just needed funding. Journals already published; they just needed advertising revenue. Regulatory agencies already governed; they just needed revolving doors. The Centers for Disease Control, founded in 1946, had originally focused on malaria. By the 1980s, it had become the Vatican of vaccination, its leaders rotating seamlessly between government and pharmaceutical posts.

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act marked pharma’s improvement on tobacco’s template. Where tobacco fought liability in court for decades, vaccines achieved complete legal immunity preemptively. Where cigarette makers faced thousand of lawsuits, vaccine manufacturers faced none. The legislation created a captive market through mandates while eliminating the primary mechanism—litigation—through which tobacco’s crimes were eventually exposed.

The Genius of Prevention vs. Treatment

Tobacco’s fundamental weakness was temporal: harm followed use, inevitably and visibly. A smoker’s cough today predicted cancer tomorrow. The causation, while denied, was ultimately undeniable. But vaccines operate in the realm of counterfactuals—preventing diseases most people would never get anyway. You cannot see a disease that didn’t happen. You cannot prove a negative. This invisibility of benefit, combined with delayed and diffused harm, creates the perfect product.

Consider the numbers that should shock but don’t: in 1970, autism affected 1 in 10,000 children. Today it’s 1 in 36. The childhood vaccine schedule expanded from 3 vaccines to 72 doses during this same period. Correlation isn’t causation, the defenders cry, yet when tobacco critics pointed to correlation between smoking and lung cancer, the same defenders called it proof. The difference isn’t scientific—it’s theological. Vaccines occupy sacred space in the medical pantheon where questioning becomes heresy.

The genius manifests in how adverse events are interpreted. When a child regresses into autism after vaccination, it’s coincidence—even when it happens 277 times every single day. When thousands of parents report identical patterns of immediate regression following MMR vaccines, they’re dismissed as confused, emotional, or attention-seeking. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System captures perhaps 1% of actual injuries, yet even this fragment is dismissed as “unverified” and “anecdotal.” Tobacco never achieved such perfect invisibility of harm.

Prevention creates its own epistemological bubble. To question vaccines, you must imagine alternate realities: What if my child wouldn’t have gotten measles anyway? What if the decrease in disease came from sanitation, not vaccination? What if the risk of injury exceeds the risk of disease? These questions require complex probabilistic thinking that can always be countered with fear. One photo of a child with measles—a disease that killed 400 Americans annually before vaccination—justifies injecting millions with dozens of doses whose cumulative effects have never been studied.

The masterstroke is making the absence of disease proof of vaccine necessity rather than success. Polio is gone, therefore we must continue vaccinating. Measles is rare, therefore we must maintain vigilance. The logic is circular and unassailable: vaccines work because disease is absent; disease is absent because vaccines work. Anyone pointing out that scarlet fever and typhoid disappeared without vaccines is ignored. The counterfactual nature of prevention makes the product intellectually unfalsifiable and emotionally irresistible.

Manufacturing Consensus Through Credentials

Where tobacco had to create scientific controversy, vaccines inherited scientific authority. The white coat that once advertised Camels now administers vaccines, but with a crucial difference: the doctor genuinely believes. Medical schools, two-thirds of whose department chairs have pharmaceutical ties, produce graduates who’ve never seen measles but have seen their careers destroyed for questioning vaccines. They emerge from training $200,000 in debt and epistemologically lobotomized—capable of complex technical procedures but incapable of questioning foundational assumptions.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, which receives millions from vaccine manufacturers, publishes guidelines that become gospel. Doctors who deviate face not just professional consequences but personal ones—ostracism from their community, investigation by medical boards, loss of hospital privileges. Dr. Bob Sears was brought before the California medical board not for harming patients but for writing medical exemptions. Dr. Paul Thomas had his license suspended for publishing data showing his unvaccinated patients were healthier. The message is clear: apostasy will be punished.

This manufactured consensus extends through every medical institution. The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which sets vaccine schedules, is staffed by members with pharmaceutical ties so extensive they require special waivers. The Institute of Medicine, tasked with investigating vaccine safety, declares vaccines “safe and effective” before beginning their reviews. Medical journals, dependent on pharmaceutical advertising and reprint purchases, publish industry ghostwritten studies while rejecting research showing harm. The peer review process, supposedly science’s quality control, becomes an enforcement mechanism for orthodoxy.

The brilliance lies in making dissent appear not just wrong but impossible. “The science is settled” becomes a thought-terminating cliché that prevents investigation. “Vaccines save lives” becomes an axiom requiring no evidence. When Dr. William Thompson, senior CDC scientist, admitted they destroyed data showing MMR vaccines increased autism risk in African American boys, the confession vanished from mainstream discourse. When the documentary “Vaxxed” tried to present his evidence, it was pulled from the Tribeca Film Festival after pharmaceutical pressure. Consensus isn’t manufactured through evidence but through the systematic exclusion of counter-evidence.

Medical students learn immunology from textbooks written by vaccine patent holders. They memorize antibody responses while never studying the unvaccinated. They recite vaccine schedules while never questioning why American children, the most vaccinated population in history, have the worst health outcomes in the developed world. The consensus they join isn’t scientific—it’s theological, complete with saints (Salk, Sabin), miracles (polio’s disappearance), and excommunication for heretics.

The Parent as Enforcer

Tobacco created individual users who might pressure friends to smoke. Vaccines create something far more powerful: parents who believe refusing vaccination is child abuse. The transformation of customers into enforcement agents represents pharma’s greatest innovation. A mother who vaccinates doesn’t just consume; she evangelizes, monitors, reports. She becomes an unpaid agent of pharmaceutical surveillance, policing other mothers with religious zeal.

The mechanism is profound: parents make irreversible decisions about their children’s bodies, injecting them with dozens of substances they don’t understand based on trust in authority. This trust, once given, becomes psychologically impossible to withdraw. To question vaccines after vaccinating your children means confronting the possibility you harmed them. The cognitive dissonance is unbearable. Better to defend the practice with increasing fervor than face that abyss.

Social media amplifies this enforcement. Mothers post vaccination photos like religious sacraments—their infant surrounded by syringes, band-aids on tiny thighs, captions about “protecting the community.” They join groups dedicated to mocking “anti-vaxxers,” sharing memes that portray vaccine-hesitant parents as child killers. They demand unvaccinated children be excluded from schools, parks, birthday parties. They’ve become willing agents of pharmaceutical apartheid, enforcing segregation with moral certainty.

The school system institutionalizes parental enforcement. Mandatory vaccination for school attendance turns every parent into a compliance officer. Those seeking exemptions must navigate bureaucratic labyrinths, submit to ideological re-education, endure public humiliation. California’s SB277 eliminated personal belief exemptions entirely, forcing parents to choose between education and bodily autonomy. Parents who comply become invested in the system’s legitimacy—admitting coercion would mean admitting their own violation.

The genius is that enforcement appears grassroots rather than corporate. When a mother demands unvaccinated children be banned from her child’s classroom, she’s not seen as a pharmaceutical agent but a concerned parent. When parents organize to eliminate vaccine exemptions, they appear as citizen activists rather than corporate pawns. The industry doesn’t need lobbyists when it has millions of parents convinced that forced vaccination is child protection. Every parent becomes a salesperson, every playground a marketplace, every conversation a potential conversion.

The Liturgy of Vaccination

Vaccination has achieved what tobacco never could: sacred status. The ritual begins before birth with maternal vaccines, continues through “well-baby” visits scheduled with religious regularity, and extends through school, college, employment. Each injection is a sacrament in the church of public health, complete with ceremonial elements that bypass rational thought and engage primitive belief.

The white coat serves as priestly vestment, the syringe as sacred implement. The vaccine schedule becomes holy writ, deviation from which constitutes mortal sin. Parents bring their children to the altar of the examination table, where they’re held down—sacrificial offerings to the god of prevention. The brief pain, the tears, the fever that follows—all transformed into signs of protection rather than harm. “It means it’s working,” parents are told, teaching them to interpret injury as benefit.

Language itself becomes liturgical. “Safe and effective” is repeated like a mantra, requiring no evidence, permitting no question. “Vaccines save lives” functions as a creed, recited without thought. “Herd immunity” becomes a moral imperative, transforming individual medical decisions into collective obligations. Those who refuse are not just wrong but selfish, dangerous, evil. They threaten not just physical health but the moral fabric of society.

The ritual calendar of vaccination creates temporal structure similar to religious observances. Two months, four months, six months, twelve months—each appointment a station of the cross in the passion of prevention. Parents who miss appointments receive calls, letters, threats. The schedule itself, increasing from 3 vaccines in 1970 to 72 doses today, is never questioned. Like prayers added to a rosary, each new vaccine joins the liturgy without examining the cumulative effect.

The transformation of vaccination into sacrament makes rational discussion impossible. You cannot debate the Eucharist with someone who believes it’s literally Christ’s body. You cannot discuss vaccine risk with someone who believes vaccines are miracles. The religious framework precludes evidence-based discussion. Faith, not facts, drives the ritual. Parents who refuse vaccines aren’t making medical decisions—they’re committing blasphemy.

This liturgical framework explains why evidence doesn’t matter. When studies show unvaccinated children are healthier, they’re dismissed like Protestant criticisms of Catholic doctrine. When vaccine court pays billions in damages, it’s ignored like church abuse settlements. The faithful don’t need evidence; they have belief. The vaccine liturgy, performed millions of times daily across the world, reinforces itself through repetition, ritual, and the powerful psychology of sunk cost.

When Damage Strengthens Belief

Tobacco’s model collapsed when harm became undeniable. But vaccines achieve something paradoxical: harm strengthens belief. When a child regresses into autism after vaccination, the parents face two possibilities: they injured their child, or it’s coincidence. The psychological pressure to choose coincidence is overwhelming. Accepting vaccine injury means confronting not just personal guilt but social exile. Better to become vaccination’s fiercest advocate than its victim.

This psychological trap creates the perfect product—one where injury increases advocacy. Parents of vaccine-injured children who accept the injury often become the movement’s most passionate critics. But those who deny it become its most zealous defenders. They must, to maintain their sanity. Every defense of vaccines becomes a defense of their own choices. Every attack on vaccine critics becomes an attack on their own doubts. The more their child suffers, the more fiercely they must believe the suffering is unrelated to vaccines.

Autism organizations exemplify this phenomenon. Autism Speaks, founded by grandparents of an autistic child, focuses exclusively on genetics, early intervention, and acceptance—never prevention. They receive millions from pharmaceutical companies and promote vaccination despite autism’s correlation with vaccine schedule expansion. Parents seeking answers are diverted into fundraising walks, awareness campaigns, and genetic studies—anything but examining the environmental trigger staring them in the face.

The medical system reinforces this denial through careful language. Children don’t become autistic after vaccination; they “manifest symptoms that were always present.” They don’t regress; they “enter a developmental phase.” The regression parents observe—loss of speech, eye contact, bowel control—is reframed as revelation of underlying conditions. Parents who insist their child changed immediately after vaccination are told they’re mistaken, confused, seeking someone to blame. Their testimony is invalidated, their experience denied.

The financial structure deepens the trap. Parents spending $50,000 annually on autism therapies cannot afford—economically or psychologically—to refuse further vaccines for younger siblings. Schools require vaccination for special education services. Therapy centers mandate compliance. Insurance covers autism treatment but not vaccine injury. The system ensures that accepting vaccine causation means losing support systems. Parents must choose between truth and survival. Most choose survival, and their choice strengthens the system that harmed them.

The Perfect Crime

Pharmaceutical companies have achieved what tobacco executives could only dream of: a product mandated by law, immune from liability, that transforms its victims into advocates. The crime is perfect because the criminals are sanctified, the victims silenced, and the witnesses blinded. Where tobacco faced journalists, lawyers, and scientists united in opposition, vaccines enjoy protection from the very institutions meant to provide oversight.

The legal immunity granted by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created moral hazard on an unprecedented scale. Manufacturers can’t be sued regardless of negligence, fraud, or contamination. The vaccine court, which has paid over $4 billion in damages, operates in secrecy with special masters instead of juries. Cases take years, require proving causation to standards impossible to meet, and cap damages below actual costs. Most families never file claims, unaware the system exists. Those who do are bound by gag orders, their stories buried in sealed settlements.

The media, dependent on pharmaceutical advertising (70% of news advertising revenue), won’t investigate vaccine harm. Journalists who try face editorial rejection, career destruction, personal attacks. Del Bigtree, Emmy-winning producer of “The Doctors,” was blacklisted after producing “Vaxxed.” Sharyl Attkisson, five-time Emmy winner, was pushed out of CBS after reporting on vaccine injuries. The message is clear: investigate anything but vaccines. The result is information darkness where even parents of injured children don’t recognize patterns hidden in plain sight.

The regulatory capture surpasses tobacco’s wildest achievements. Julie Gerberding, CDC director who oversaw vaccine schedule expansion, became president of Merck’s vaccine division. Scott Gottlieb moved from FDA commissioner to Pfizer board member. The revolving door doesn’t just spin; it’s motorized. The agencies meant to protect public health have become pharmaceutical subsidiaries, their function inverted from protection to promotion.

The perfection of the crime lies in its invisibility. Tobacco harm was eventually undeniable—lung cancer, emphysema, death. But vaccine harm hides behind complexity, delayed onset, and diagnostic manipulation. Autism is genetic. SIDS is unexplained. Autoimmune diseases are environmental. Allergies are hygiene-related. Each condition with exploding prevalence is explained by everything except the obvious: the 72 injections every child receives. The crime is so perfect that victims thank their assailants, witnesses deny what they’ve seen, and investigators refuse to investigate.

This is the playbook perfected: create a product that prevents invisible disease, causes deniable harm, generates its own enforcement, and transforms medicine into religion. Where tobacco took decades to build its apparatus of deception, vaccines inherited and improved it. Where cigarettes faced eventual justice, vaccines enjoy perpetual immunity. The student has surpassed the teacher, creating not just addiction but devotion, not just customers but congregations, not just profit but power. The tobacco playbook was impressive. The vaccine playbook is perfect.


References

“Agnotology.” Lies are Unbekoming, April 2023.

“Epistemic Capture.” Unbekoming, September 2025.

“The Post-Truth Era: Reality vs. Perception.” UNO Magazine, Issue 27, March 2017. Developing Ideas by LLORENTE & CUENCA.

“The War on Knowing.” Unbekoming, July 2025.


I appreciate you being here.

If you’ve found the content interesting, useful and maybe even helpful, please consider supporting it through a small paid subscription. While 99% of everything here is free, your paid subscription is important as it helps in covering some of the operational costs and supports the continuation of this independent research and journalism work. It also helps keep it free for those that cannot afford to pay.

Please make full use of the Free Libraries.

Unbekoming Interview Library: Great interviews across a spectrum of important topics.

Unbekoming Book Summary Library: Concise summaries of important books.

Stories

I’m always in search of good stories, people with valuable expertise and helpful books. Please don’t hesitate to get in touch at unbekoming@outlook.com

Baseline Human Health

Watch and share this profound 21-minute video to understand and appreciate what health looks like without vaccination.

A NZ couple’s battle with incompetence, cover-ups, outright lies and legal bullying 

A battle funded by unsuspecting tax payers… another land grab?

From the Daily Telegraph

The Americans say “You can’t fight City Hall”. When you take on your council, Big Bureaucracy always wins because it is not a fair game.

Not only do they set the rules, they are the referee as well.

In central governments, the average worker is a nobody. Managers might have influence in their own departments, but not in others. In local government, people are more interconnected. This makes the problem worse. You could appeal to your elected representatives, but they are more likely to know the key people, work with them regularly, and need them in the future. You will be sacrificed for the ongoing relationship.

It is a world-wide issue. Here is a typical example from New Zealand, that has all the hallmarks of a classic battle with incompetence, cover-ups, outright lies and legal bullying funded by the deep pockets of unsuspecting taxpayers. “David” is Murray and Margaret Shaw, while “Goliath” is the Hamilton City Council.

The Shaws are retired, and have devoted a couple of decades to creating a beautiful nature sanctuary on the outskirts of the city. There are ponds, trees and an abundance of native birds, safe from the city where pet cats often kill chicks, and street lights dazzle the owls at night.

The council has spent the same couple of decades planning suburban growth to devour the surrounding land. Thousands of pages of reports and studies gathered dust on shelves as the wheels of bureaucracy turned slowly. But a sudden offer in 2017 of $280m in government funding changed that. The politicians needed target dates for each stage (unsurprisingly connected to election timetables), so City Hall was under time pressure to deliver.

READ AT THE LINK

50 Years On: Anniversary of the Historic Māori Land March

Note: Lamestream has been curiously silent on this topic this year. At the 40th anniversary in 2016 there was a special doco made in commemoration that had disappeared from sight when I searched a year or so ago …. I finally located & purchased it after a long trail of emails. I was invited a year ago by one online magazine to write for this commemoration, only to find there was nary a mention of it come the time. Zero. Anywhere. Again I find this curious. A quick search turned up a couple of art exhibitions on topic but nothing. Fifty years on? Such a memorable event? Who controls lamestream? Anyway I happened, quite by chance, to take part in the first leg of this March in 1975, and did write of the experience as invited. I have posted it below FYI … If the event interests you at all that is. Such interest among my peers is pretty minimal I would have to say. Indeed it produces either deafening silence, or indignant reactions. The truth of our histories must be told in order to move forwards. Perhaps in this era with the endless lying we have witnessed, it may provoke more interest? The lying goes way back. It is quite frankly, what woke me up. EWNZ


The Land March of ‘75… I recall clearly that memorable moment, setting off from Te Hāpua in the Far North. Those first steps on the metal road, the crunching of shoes on the stones, eager feet not yet blistered and sore, the excited kōrero going on around us, and that now iconic image of Dame Whina Cooper and her little moko at the front, walking up the hill! And that tag line … ‘not one more acre!’

What an historic moment it was!

I am 74 now. I was only 24 back then. On reflection, it was a year to remember, for reasons I could never have foreseen, and marking the beginning of big changes in my life. I was about to embark on a five decade long learning curve, that like the March, would have many twists and turns. It was a journey that would teach me that no, as the popular belief was back then, NZ did not have the ‘best race relations in the world’. More importantly, I would learn why.

And yet you could say it was only by chance really that I happened to be caught up in the March at all. Perhaps it was providence?

The Haka, performed just prior to setting off from Te Hāpua (Image Credit: Pam Vernon)

Either way, for various reasons, I’d already dismissed the prospect of going. Being a single parent with my three year old daughter Kahuiarangi in tow, the trip would have posed too many challenges. I was not long out of a violent marriage, so going up there alone was out of the question. I was also very shy. I had already learned a little about the intended March as I’d been following and supporting various protest groups at the time. One of those was CARE, the Citizens Association for Racial Equality. Racism and human rights were a big focus back then. HART, Halt All Racist Tours, was another. That was about South Africa’s official policy of ‘no Blacks allowed’ on their Springbok teams. Consequently, there were fierce protests NZ wide whenever the Springboks toured. There were many folk then who had a real determination to stamp out racism. There were of course the other folk who, like today, believed the aforementioned propaganda on race relations. It was a case of ‘good luck’ to anyone daring to challenge that one.

Those perceptions were challenged however, with the ‘75 March, and then again with the 1981 Springbok tour which saw over 200 demonstrations in 28 centers throughout New Zealand. There were 1500 people charged with offenses related to those events. People were not having a bar of racism, artists and poets included.

leaving te hapua, maori land march
Setting off from Te Hapua (image credit: nzgeo.com)

So as chance (or providence) would have it then, on 13 September 1975, I received a phone call from my old friend Barnie Pikari. He and his mate Tama Poata had broken down near Marton, not too far from Hunterville where I was living. I’d not seen Barnie for several years. It turned out he and Tama had left Wellington, heading for Te Hāpua in Tama’s Bedford truck, intending to spend time with Tama’s friend Saana Murray in the Far North before the March began. Tama had helped Saana with her book Te Karanga a te Kotuku. I’d been reading it so had learned a bit about Saana’s struggles in retaining her ancestral lands in the north. The truck fix required parts that would take some time to arrive, so he and Barnie had been forced to find other means of traveling north. As it happened, I’d just purchased my very first car, a little 1961 Ford Prefect, so without hesitation I offered to drive them. I’d never driven that far before so fortunately, had given little thought to the logistics of such a long trip. I say fortunately, because had I done so I likely would never have offered! The trip would take more than twelve hours and the roads in 1975 were very different to 2025.

After packing a few essentials we piled into the Prefect and set off almost straight away, taking turns driving. Obviously, we eventually got there, but not without difficulty. Being a first car I’d not thought about things like spare tyres so at Hamilton, when we got a flattie in the middle of the night, with my spare at home in the laundry, we were forced to get very creative and figure out alternatives! Kiwi ingenuity prevailed and Tama and Barnie came up with the brilliant idea of cutting grass from the side of the road and stuffing the tyre. Gradually we limped, regularly re-stuffing it, until we arrived in Auckland and were able to buy a new one. We sped on north then to arrive at Te Hāpua just as breakfast was finishing. We had a short meet up and photos with Rowley Habib and Saana, watched the haka and listened to the departure kōrero, then set off.

Left to right: Saana Murray, Rowley Habib, Barnie Pikari, Pam Vernon and Kahuriarangi Te Huatahi at Te Hāpua just before the March

I’d decided by then, having traveled that far and having company now, I would stay on and join the March for a while at least, which turned out to be the Te Hāpua to Auckland leg. My daughter, an easy going child, seemed to have coped okay with the trip, and there were other children now for her to play with.

Kahuiarangi and Dame Whina’s little moko

Dame Whina’s little moko was the same age as her so she occasionally came with us in the car. Barnie occasionally drove so I could join the hikoi, sometimes pushing my daughter in her pushchair. Tama had become more involved at an organizational level so aside from the occasional catch up we didn’t see too much of him after that. Along the way we would all stop as a group for refreshments and for tending to sore and blistered feet.

I wish I could say I remember all the content of Dame Whina’s kōrero along the way. In our rush for departure I hadn’t thought of pen and paper, or that I’d even need them, and of course there was no such thing as mobile phones with video and photographic capability. Plus, I had a three year old to care for. Every evening Dame Whina would address those present and explain the purpose of the March, educating us on the historic detail including her own experiences. The concept of government theft of land was pretty new to me, and for most New Zealanders I believe, still is. It blew me away. What particularly struck home from those often fiery nightly kōrero at the respective marae, was our education on the various government Acts, particularly the Public Works Act. Via these Acts, lands were ‘temporarily’ confiscated for other purposes during wartime for instance, then neither returned as promised, nor fully compensated for. Like the lands of the Tainui Awhiro people that had been taken during World War II for an aerodrome, then retained after the war and not returned as promised. Part of those lands had then been turned into the Raglan golf course. It took years of protest and resistance before they were finally returned in 1987. So this taking of lands wasn’t just back in the 1800s as many believe. Folk of my era will know that this kind of information was not imparted to us in our history lessons at school. Rather we learned about the English wars abroad, wars of no great relevance to us. We little knew that we had our own histories of war fought right here … wars of land conquest by the colonial government. Wars over lands that some Māori did not want to sell but which the settler government was determined to have. The richer and more strategically situated lands of the Bay of Plenty, Waikato, Hawke’s Bay, Taranaki and elsewhere, where in all, six million acres were confiscated. In order to justify this, non-sellers were cleverly classed ‘rebels’. Another method of land acquisition has been the perpetual lease system. Māori lands leased for pennies on the dollar so to speak, stripping the owners of their right to manage their own whenua. To get those lands back requires repayment of unmanageable sums to the lessees for improvements made. Mihingarangi Forbes reports on this situation in Tokomaru Bay and the Taranaki and how it has become now an even more unjust situation that no government wants to address. Also mentioned in her documentary, there is the taking of lands from Māori soldiers who went to fight in the world wars. Many returned from war to find they were landless. All with the stroke of a pen. To achieve this land grabbing, there were wars using weaponry, and wars using pen and paper. As the saying goes, the pen is mightier than the sword … in this case yes, those Land Acts did a great job of conquest. Such was Te Kooti Tango Whenua: the Land Taking Court, literally. This was the Native Land Court. For more light on that, one should read Professor David Williams‘ book of that name. He gets very specific about the machinations of that Court, recorded by him as being by far the greater tool for land acquisition than any other. Williams cites IH Kawharu as calling it a ‘veritable engine of destruction’ (ibid p 17). Dr Danny Keenan describes it as ‘predatory’ and ‘ruinous’.

So my learning curve had just begun, not just about land loss, but another important aspect: that of my own whakapapa and identity. I began to research this more after the March was over. My tupuna hail from the Whanganui River. Ko Te Āti Haunui-a-Pāpārangi te iwi.

Ko au te awa, ko te awa ko au
I am the river and the river is me.

So my dad was Māori but knew nothing of our history or our connections to pass on to us, his generation being well into the assimilation process. Dad’s grandmother was Kiri Te Huatahi. She was raised on the river and her daughter Ani, Dad’s mother, was raised at Pipiriki. Dad’s great grandfather Toi Te Huatahi was from Tāngarākau. Dad’s grandmother Kiri had married a Scotsman, William Ross, and his own mum had married a French Canadian, Albert Vernon. So he and his six siblings were raised in Pākehā ways.

We’d been up the Whanganui River road in search of clues to our history not too long before the March as it happened. I recall him peering across the river from Pipiriki to where he’d been told his Aunt Harriett had been buried when she was just 11 years old. She’d drowned in the river. Her older brother later died as a teen from poisoning by green grapes it was said, according to the Doctor who saw him at the time. We do know now that flour intended for non-sellers on the river was poisoned i with arsenic. I do wonder about my great uncle and whether he somehow fell victim to it.

For my dad, his six siblings and his mum, those were survival years. The way forward for many was seen as learning and adopting Pākehā ways in order to live in a Pākehā world. Language banned in schools, lands largely gone and an assimilation agenda well under way, my dad and his siblings faced as little kids, a very racist world. Folk, they said, would cross the road rather than speak to them in 1920s Whanganui. They were half castes! My Pākehā mum’s widowed mother slapped her face when she learned Mum was going to marry Dad.

Art Installation by the author: Non-selling Maori were targeted with arsenic laced flour (David Young, Woven by Water, p24-25) (Photo Credit: Pam Vernon)

Unfortunately the ‘half castes’ end up feeling they don’t belong in either world. Artist Natalie Robertson aptly describes this as standing astride two tectonic plates that shift and moveii.

The racism has not gone away. It’s simply gone underground.

Ironically, and by way of illustration, while on the March we encountered a racist incident in Auckland. It had been raining that night in Auckland and all three of us were very tired. We decided to spend a night in a motel to dry off our wet clothing and rest as I intended returning home with my daughter the next day. The first motel we approached had a sign out indicating vacancies. Barnie suggested I go in and arrange the booking while he stay in the car with my daughter. That was all good. Then when I signaled to him that we had a booking he drove up to the parking area outside. As we organized our gear to go in however, we were told a mistake had been made and there weren’t any vacancies. Being highly suspicious, we promptly drove around the corner and phoned the motel from a phone booth asking were there vacancies. Yes was the reply. They had vacancies, proving our suspicion was correct, that they’d denied us on grounds of race. Being new to such scenarios, I was angered and determined to approach the Race Relations people to make a complaint, however Barnie promptly waved that off as a waste of time.

Tama Poata (marching with the pou) and Barnie Pikari: Land March 1975

I’ve concluded from what I’ve witnessed over ensuing years that he was probably right. For most Māori, the scenario described is not an uncommon one.

Returning home, Tama came with me to get his truck, now repaired, to then return and rejoin the hikoi. All updates on the March were from there on by phone and via the nightly news where it was making headlines daily. Tama’s and my kōrero while traveling was further education for me. His long term involvement with human rights, particularly for Māori, made him a deep well of information. The following is information that particularly stood out for me and you will see why.

At the time of the March, I had been a Christian for three years. I’d been converted on a Gisborne marae, at my father in law Hikiera Mihaere’s tangi. My brother in law Truby had explained to me the tenets of the Gospels and my decision there to follow Christ had brought great peace and reassurance to my life. It was very real. Truby was in training in Auckland at the time to be a Baptist minister. With my still new found Christian faith, I was naively confident that God could easily fix racism and restore lost Māori lands, and I told Tama so. His unexpected yet kindly response (recognizing my ignorance) was nevertheless to the point.

It was the Christian Church he said, that had made the largest acquisitions of Māori lands.

This info took the wind right out of my sails. What could I possibly say to that? Three decades on, I would read in The Rich A New Zealand History by Stevan Eldred-Grigg (p 25) that the children and grandchildren of the first Williams generation (missionary Reverend Henry Williams’ family) had become wealthy land owners by the end of that century. Graeme Hunt reports in The Rich List (2000, p22) that at the time of writing some 800 of Henry’s direct descendants owned more land than any other family in NZ. Although later reinstated, Williams had been dismissed from the Church Missionary Society for these extensive land acquisitions. There were some denominations however that forbade them, period. Clearly Reverend Williams did much good in his time of service both to God and to people. I don’t doubt that. Such large purchases of land however, clearly did little good for God’s reputation. And the prices back then were unarguably fire sale. They are purchases that dog the Reverend’s reputation to this day.

And so, remember that the victors wrote our histories. However, my consolation is that nothing is hidden that won’t eventually be revealed as the Reverend’s good book tells us in Matthew 10:26.

POST SCRIPT

Both Barnie and Tama have passed on now. After the March Barnie joined with Ngā Tamatoa and was part of the occupation of Parliament grounds. He went on to protest vigorously against injustice and racism, both here and in Australia, he wrote articles for the Porirua Community newspaper Te Awa Iti, and co-authored a book, He Whakaaro Ke. He also trained as a Social Worker, and worked for both the Children & Young Persons Service and Māori Mental Health Services. Tama continued his long time involvement in activism against injustice including South African apartheid and the Vietnam War. He wrote a memoir called Seeing Beyond the Horizon that tells his life story, including his impressive achievements in film. He was also involved with initiating the Wai 262 claim, was involved with film, acting in Ngati, a landmark Māori film, plus he acted in and directed many other films. He also promoted indigenous film making in NZ and overseas. At Tama’s passing the late Tariana Turia stated “Tom was one of our quiet revolutionaries who changed our world for the better, in so many different areas” iii. You can find Tama’s book at Steele Roberts’ publishing site. Although now out of print, you will find Barnie’s book from time to time on the second hand book sites.

My dear Dad who weaves intricately into our story, had gone off to World War II at barely 17 years old and had returned amazingly with all of his four brothers. He then met and married our Mum in Whanganui, trained as a builder, then worked hard for the rest of his life, along with my Mum, supporting our family and growing our kai. In his last two years of life, living in the Bay of Plenty with our Mum, he joined the Presbyterian Māori Mission and began learning te reo.

During my child raising years I trained part time as a social worker. After working for six years with Child Youth and Family, I resigned in 1999 and enrolled in a Ucol art class. While studying I attended an art exhibition titled: Parihaka: The Art of Passive Resistance, highlighting a government invasion that didn’t make it into our history books (the victors write our histories). You can read the Parihaka story at their website.  I then applied to study Māori Visual Arts at Toioho ki Apiti  in Palmerston North. There I would learn more about the Treaty of Waitangi and our true histories, including my own. My art is, among other things, about colonization, the resultant destruction of our environment and about our true histories. I also write. (links below to my websites).


Note: The land grabs continue. The SNAs are another ruse to grab lands.
See here also: Hīkoi of hundreds against Far North SNAs to follow Dame Whina Cooper’s footsteps

 Townsville Next Up for Land Grabs?
Catherine Austin Fitts On Helene: “It’s Not A Natural Event” Says It Is A Giant Land Grab
 NZ & FURTHER PROPOSED SNA LAND GRABS: 1500 West Coast property owners recently received letters in the mail, out of the blue, stating that their properties have been zoned for takeover by state control …
More on the Aboriginal land grab genocide: 27 elders die within 4 hours of the jab!

i Young, D., Woven by Water, pp 49-50

ii https://www.academia.edu/10943197/A_Journey_of_Belonging_Natalie_Robertson_New_Media_spaces_of_Belonging_in_the_context_of_Maori_art?auto=download

iii Poata, T. Seeing Beyond the Horizon, p 283

Links to my other sites:

Earth’s Blood Stains
Truth Watch NZ
Environmental Health Watch NZ
Just Art NZ

The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future (2025)

CoronavirusPlushie

The Agenda: Their Vision | Your Future is a feature-length independent documentary produced by Mark Sharman; former UK broadcasting executive at ITV and Sky (formerly BSkyB).

In fiction and fact, there have always been people and organisations with ambitions to control the world. And now the oligarchs who pull the strings of finance and power finally have the tools to achieve their global objectives; omnipresent surveillance, artificial intelligence, digital currency and ultimately digital identities. The potential for social control of our lives and minds is alarmingly real.

The plan has been decades in the making and has seen infiltration of Governments, local councils, big business, civil society, the media and, crucially, education. A ceaseless push for a new reality, echoing Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, or George Orwell’s 1984.

The Agenda: Their Vision, Your Future examines the digital prison which awaits us if we do not push back right now. How your food, energy, money, travel and even your access to the internet could be limited and controlled; how financial power is strangling democracy and how global institutions like the World Health Organisation are commandeered to champion ideological and fiscal objectives.

The centrepiece is man-made climate change and with it, the race to Net Zero. Both are encapsulated in the United Nations and its Agenda 2030. A force for good? Or “a blank cheque for totalitarian global control”?

The Agenda presents expert views from the UK, the USA and Europe.

The sugar industry has manipulated scientific research on fluoride since the 1930s

From Children’s Health Defense

Sugar Industry Falsified Science to Sell America on Fluoride

A new study reveals the sugar industry has manipulated fluoride science since the 1930s — exaggerating benefits, concealing risks and steering attention away from sugar’s role in tooth decay. The findings show that industry influence shaped fluoridation policies, raising urgent questions about the public health guidance that persists today.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

The sugar industry has manipulated scientific research on fluoride since the 1930s — exaggerating its benefits, suppressing concerns about serious side effects and shifting attention away from sugar’s role in tooth decay, according to a study published Monday in the journal Environmental Health.

Internal sugar industry and dental organization documents, analyzed by the study’s author Christopher Neurath, detail how the sugar industry helped shape the public health policies that, for decades, touted fluoride as a “magic bullet” against tooth decay.

The documents also show how the tobacco and chemical industries later adopted those tactics.

Neurath, research director for the American Environmental Health Studies Project, told The Defender that his research builds on work by Dr. Cristin Kearns. Kearns revealed how the sugar industry paid scientists to downplay links between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as a risk factor.

The sugar industry — and the industrial food industry as a whole — “have played a huge role in manipulating not just the science, but the policy,” Neurath said of his findings. “I think this helps to show they are likely culprit No. 1 in the chronic disease epidemic.”

Controversy over water fluoridation exploded after plaintiffs won a landmark lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in September 2024. The ruling — now on appeal — compels the agency to set new rules for regulating fluoride in water because fluoride poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s neurodevelopment.

Since then, numerous communities — and two states — have decided to stop fluoridating their water.

The “Make Our Children Healthy Again” strategy report, published earlier this month under the direction of U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., called on the EPA to review new science on fluoride’s potential health risks. The report also instructed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to update its water fluoridation recommendations.

Despite the scientific findings exposing fluoride’s dangers, public health officials and pro-fluoride organizations like the American Dental Association (ADA), as well as most legacy media organizations, remain committed to the narrative that water fluoridation is safe, effective and necessary.

Neurath’s study traces the sugar industry’s influence on fluoride policy back nearly 100 years, through major research institutions, the ADA and U.S. government programs.

“Chris Neurath’s new article shows how the sugar industry used fluoridation as a smoke screen — a tactic that raises troubling questions about the science that supported it,” Dr. Bruce Lanphear, an expert on the neurotoxic effects of environmental chemicals at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, told The Defender.

“These findings make it imperative for dentists, physicians and public health authorities to urgently re-examine the risks and benefits of fluoridation,” he said.

Lanphear is the principal investigator in one of the seminal cohort studies linking maternal exposure to fluoridated water to cognitive deficits in their children.

Industry established ‘Sugar Fellowship’ to investigate fluoride in 1930s

The sugar industry began its campaign to shift attention away from sugar’s effects on dental health in the 1930s, when it funded the Sugar Fellowship, held by chemist Gerald Cox at the Mellon Institute of Industrial Research.

“The Sugar Fellowship was intended to produce evidence that would exonerate sugar from causing tooth decay (dental caries) or failing that, find ways to reduce caries without restricting sugar consumption,” Neurath wrote.

Cox studied the impact of sugar consumption on cavities in rats. In 1939, his flawed experiments — sometimes showing more decay in fluoride groups — led him to propose adding fluoride to drinking water.

Cox wrote major portions of a 1952 National Research Council report on the prevention of cavities that emphasized fluoride’s role. He never disclosed his links to the sugar industry.

That work gave the industry its “magic bullet” against tooth decay, Neurath said.

ADA agrees to ‘cooperate’ with sugar industry

In the decades that followed, the sugar industry quietly worked behind the scenes to use Cox’s flawed science to drive public health policy.

In the 1940s, it created the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF).

In 1944, Fice Mork, son of the president of the New York State Dental Society, left his position as public relations counsel for the ADA to become SRF’s public relations consultant.

That year, Mork and Robert Hockett, who directed SRF from its founding until 1953 — when he left to work for the tobacco industry — met with ADA executives who agreed to “cooperate” with SRF.

According to Neurath, Mork and Hockett persuaded the ADA to reverse its position on cavities. Instead of blaming cavities on nutritional deficiencies like excessive sugar consumption and vitamin D deficiency, the ADA began to promote fluoride as a solution for cavities.

Mork and Hockett organized a 1944 symposium for thousands of dentists, without disclosing that SRF was funding the event.

“The symposium was an opening salvo in a public campaign to promote fluoride and fluoridation as the solution to prevent tooth decay,” Neurath wrote. The “founding fathers of fluoridation” gave presentations on its benefits, according to Neurath.

SRF paid to print and mail 100,000 copies of the symposium proceedings to every dentist in the U.S., and also to pediatricians, public health officials and dental schools.

Mork and Hockett also met with the new editor of the Journal of the American Dental Association, Harold Hillenbrand, who agreed to “unofficially” inform Hockett about the positions of various people inside the ADA regarding the policy shift toward fluoride.

Hillenbrand later became the executive director of the ADA and held the position until 1970.

Kellogg’s teams up with dental industry to promote fluoride

During that same period, an executive from Kellogg’s — maker of sugary cereals — became chair of the ADA committee that set its dental health policy. The organization stopped pushing to reduce sugar consumption and started pushing fluoride.

Philippe Hujoel, DDS, Ph.D., a professor at the University of Washington whose own research exposed conflicts of interest regarding fluoride at the ADA, said Neurath’s revelations “add a substantial number of details on how organizations hide/obscure/protect their internal deliberations, their internal conflicts of interest.”

He added:

“Maybe more importantly, his report documents in detail the long, difficult, and arduous process of trying to uncover what happens behind the walls of confidentiality of organizations. The amount of work done by Chris is astounding.

“Reading Chris’s article, I was reminded of a quote by Alberto Brandolini, a Programmer: ‘The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.’ Chris’s work suggests it may be several orders of magnitude bigger.”

Hillenbrand was one of the first dentists to be elected to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which raises questions about other IOM appointments, according to Hujoel.

“One wonders about all the other appointments at this Institute of Medicine and to what extent these appointments are partly responsible for the current diabetes epidemic,” he said.

Dentists ‘largely unaware’ of how sugar industry manipulated science

Neurath told The Defender that the sugar industry’s deceptive tactics have been going on for so long that many dentists and public health officials who embrace the use of fluoride are “largely unaware of any industry manipulation of the science.”

“The sugar industry very consciously targeted dentists,” he said. “They went to the top of the dentistry profession and got the ADA on board,” and the leaders of the ADA “hid the fact that they were essentially cooperating with the sugar industry from practicing dentists.”

The sugar industry also targeted dental schools and universities, Neurath said.

At Harvard School of Public Health, Fredrick Stare championed the idea that water fluoridation would prevent cavities. He founded Harvard’s Department of Nutrition largely with donations from the sugar industry and Big Food, according to Neurath.

Extracted from one of Fredrick Stare’s hundreds of weekly syndicated newspaper column articles. Credit: Christopher Neurath.

Neurath also reveals evidence that the industry influenced the National Institutes of Health National Caries Program, funded by Congress and launched in 1971 to fight tooth decay. He said the policy agenda for the program used language written by the International Sugar Research Foundation, the SRF’s successor organization.

Sugar industry, Big Food suppress facts on fluoride’s dangers

Today, the influence of the sugar industry is embodied in the giant food and beverage corporations, including Coca-Cola, the largest purveyor of sugar globally. Neurath said it is “almost the equivalent of the sugar industry today.”

In 2003, Coca-Cola donated $1 million to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, which has a “long-standing policy of promoting water fluoridation.”

More recently, as evidence emerged linking water fluoridation to reduced IQ in children, industry-backed scientists have gone on the attack.

Sugary food and beverage corporations, including Coca-Cola and Kellogg’s, contributed tens of millions of dollars to the National Academies of Science, Engineering & Medicine, which interfered with the publication of the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) seminal report linking fluoride to neurotoxicity in children.

As lobbyists within the ADA were working with government officials to block the release of the NTP report, scientists with links to a German organization, International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), published their own review of the science.

The review found “no cause for concern,” according to the press release that accompanied its publication, and has been touted by fluoridation promoters in their claims that water fluoridation is safe.

ILSI was founded by a vice president of Coca-Cola and has been funded by the beverage maker “along with a long list of major companies in the sugary foods, processed foods, infant formula, chemical, pesticide, oil and pharmaceutical industries,” Neurath said.

Documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests by plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the EPA revealed that the Oral Health Division of the CDC — the agency largely responsible for promoting fluoridation at the governmental level — privately met with some authors of the German review for help in counteracting the NTP’s findings.

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

Please Donate Today

The ongoing struggle over water fluoridation

The ADA, together with organizations like the American Fluoridation Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics, continues a national campaign to push water fluoridation as safe and effective.

The organizations are quoted in The New York Times and proudly send pro-fluoridation representatives across the country to intervene when communities debate changing their water fluoridation policies.

Government records requests show that these activities include coordinating behind the scenes with government officials — in ways that violate rules of federal grants — and bullying local officials who raise concerns.

The evidence on fluoride’s benefits has changed, and proof of its harms to children’s health is substantial, Neurath told The Defender.

In October 2024, an updated Cochrane Review concluded that adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited, if any, dental benefits, especially compared with 50 years ago.

Overwhelming scientific research shows that fluoride’s benefits to teeth are topical, not the result of ingesting fluoride. Research also shows that ingesting fluoride is linked to behavioral issues, disruption of thyroid functioning and disruption of the gut microbiome.

Numerous recent studies have shown fluoride’s links to reduced IQ and other neurodevelopmental issues in children.

Many major professional medical organizations have quietly dropped their previous long-term support for water fluoridation. These include the American Cancer Society, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, and the American College of Preventive Medicine.

The ADA did not respond to The Defender’s request for comment on the study.Related articles in The Defender

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master’s from the University of Texas at Austin.

SOURCE

Image credit: pixabay.com

More than 20 NZ MPs rent back their own homes at the taxpayer’s expense

From The Post

At least 20 MPs are claiming up to $45,000 a year allowance to stay in their own Wellington homes, a perk that sees the taxpayer help politicians pay off their mortgages.

Four ministers (Duncan Webb, Jan Tinetti, Deborah Russell and Willie Jackson) claimed the capped allowance, of up to $45,000 a year, to cover living costs in the city. They then use it to pay rent on property they already own.

Four Government MPs (Arena Williams, Jenny Salesa, Jamie Strange and Sarah Pallet) claim an entitlement of up to $31,000 per year.

Twelve National Party MPs, including leader Christopher Luxon, do the same. They are: Andrew Bayly; Gerry Brownlee; Judith Collins; Jacqui Dean; Barbara Kuriger; Melissa Lee; Ian McKelvie; Mark Mitchell; Simon O’Connor; Stuart Smith; Louise Upston and Michael Woodhouse.

ACT’s Simon Court also claims the allowance and owns property in the Capital, but the party did not respond to a request for comment.

No current Green Party or Te Pāti Māori MPs from outside of Wellington listed a property on their pecuniary interest register.

The arrangements are entirely within Parliament’s rules. And neither Labour nor National have plans to change them. In fact, MPs may soon be in line for a boost to their pay and perks.

READ MORE AT THE LINK

https://www.thepost.co.nz/politics/350088591/more-20-mps-rent-back-their-own-homes-taxpayers-expense

Photo credit: envirowatchnz.com

Revealed: New Zealand’s Cruel Genetic Engineering Animal Field Trials Reach An End (GE-Free New Zealand)

From GE-Free New Zealand

The GE Animal experimental field trials have ended in failure.  The disastrous trials have come at the cost of years of cruelty to the animals.

The trials involving hundreds of animals over two decades have been largely kept under the radar from public scrutiny, but as of June 2025, the AgResearch Annual Report to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) show there are no GE animals surviving in the New Zealand Ruakura field trials. [1]

The data sourced from AgResearch’s Ruakura facility annual reports have been compiled in ‘The GE Animals Report 2014-2025‘ [2] which summarises the genetic engineering trials on a range of farm animals in New Zealand. The earlier report GE Animals the First Fifteen years 2000-2015 showed the same inhumane issues arising. [3]

The report documents years of adverse outcomes like spontaneous abortions, cancers, deformities and sterility that the GE animals suffered and raises serious ethical concerns about why the GE animal experimentation was ever allowed. 

 “This is an unacceptable level of inhumanity to sentient animals,” said Claire Bleakley, president of GE Free NZ, who compiled the report findings. “Sadly, the cruelty has been allowed to continue for 25 years. There has been little ethical constraint on the objectives of profit and patents allowing the scientific realities to be ignored.”

 Although the GE animals have now all been terminated, there is concern that a new wave of cruel experiments will commence under The Gene Technology Bill with no regulatory oversight of ethics or animal welfare.

 All the scientific information on the failed outcomes of the 20 field trials was excluded from consideration by MPs on the Health Select Committee and was never considered by MBIE or the Technology Advisory Group when The Gene Technology Bill was drafted. [4]  

 “The authors of the Bill were told such evidence did not exist on any of the 20 field trials.  This means that the Select Committee and government members were not briefed on the failures, misery and distress to animals or the deleterious effect on New Zealand’s reputation and trade relationships,” said Jon Carapiet, spokesman for GE-Free NZ. 

This dark history of cruel animal experiments reinforces the need for a ban on GE animals and the need for the highest ethical global practices to be part of New Zealand legislation. 

 Keeping New Zealand GE-Free aligns with the values of people who prioritise ethical standards and want to see New Zealand lead by example in both innovation and compassion towards animals. 

Read further articles on topic at https://www.gefree.org.nz/

 References:

[1] https://www.epa.govt.nz/database-search/hsno-application-register/view/erma200223/

[2]GE Animals in New Zealand 2010 – 2025: Part 2 – The second fifteen years. https://www.gefree.org.nz/assets/Uploads/GE-Animals-in-NZ-Part-2-FIN-WEB.pdf

[3] GE Animals The first Fifteen Years https://www.gefree.org.nz/assets/pdf/GE-Animals-in-New-Zealand.pdf

[4] Ref: DOIA-REQ-0008002- https://www.gefree.org.nz/assets/Uploads/Response-letter.pdf

 ENDS:

Claire Bleakley 027 348 6732

Jon Carapiet 021 0507681

Photo credit: envirowatchnz.com

Waking up to the global climate engineering reality can be overwhelming (Answers To The Most Commonly Asked Questions from Geoengineering Watch)

As per the title, if you’re new to this ongoing reality or still think it’s conspiracy, Geoengineering Watch provides some answers to your questions.

Here’s THE LINK