Tag Archives: mRNA shot

News, Vaccines

Coming Soon: More Forced Jabs, Are You Prepared? (US – Mercola)

4 Comments

Video Link

Story at-a-glance

  • The World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty, the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs) and the global One Health agenda are all part of a soft coup, a global power grab
  • The globalists’ plan for our future can be summarized as “global dominion by the few and total control of the masses”
  • The technocratic cabal has control over most if not all Western governments, as well as the bureaucratic structure of the WHO; 85% of its funding comes from private entities, so it’s owned by private interests
  • Based on the current treaty draft and proposed IHR amendments, it’s clear that mRNA-based vaccinations will be mandatory under the WHO’s power structure, and these vaccines will be made in 100 days by skipping human trials and shaving safety and efficacy testing down to the bare bones
  • Under the treaty, as currently written, nations will be required to surveil and censor social media. The WHO’s narrative will be the only one allowed

In this September 1, 2023, Highwire interview,1 Dr. Meryl Nass, a biowarfare and epidemics expert, exposes the threat posed by the World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs), which add to and further strengthen the WHO’s powers under the treaty. The WHO’s One Health agenda is also part of this power grab.

Nass also recently published an article, “The WHO’s Proposed Treaty Will Increase Manmade Pandemics,”2,3 in which she reviews the history of biological warfare and the role of gain-of-function research, where we are right now, and what the globalists’ plan for our future is. It’s imperative everyone understand what the plan is, because we can only stop it by rejecting it en masse.

Nass Persecuted by Lawless State Medical Board

But first, Nass provides an update on her personal situation. In January 2022, the Maine medical board suspended Nass’ medical license for spreading “COVID misinformation” and prescribing ivermectin. They also ordered her to undergo a psychological evaluation by a board-selected psychologist.4 Nass refused.

As she points out in the interview, “misinformation” refers to information that may be mistaken or inaccurate, but being wrong is not a crime — no matter how badly government wants you to think it is.

We have the First Amendment — freedom of speech — for a reason. Government does not have the legal right to suppress our speech, and the medical board is a state government agency. So, by censoring doctors like Nass and punishing them for speaking their minds and sharing medical and scientific data, they are actually the ones breaking the law.

Nass didn’t, because there’s no law against sharing information, even if it is suspected of being incorrect, or can be proven to be wrong. And, in this case, the board is actually punishing her for sharing truths.

So, in mid-August 2023, Nass sued the Maine medical board, and every board member in their personal capacity, for violating her free speech rights.5

“Telling me that I can’t talk about the vaccine or I can’t talk about the treatment of COVID or masks or distancing, even when the things that I was saying were based on published medical literature, that is a First Amendment violation,” Nass said in a statement.

“The state government and the federal government are not allowed to restrict the speech of people. So we are looking for a jury trial to see whether the Board of Licensure in Medicine is guilty of a malicious, political prosecution and targeting of me.”

The Plan in Broad Strokes

So, what is the globalists plan for our future? Summarized into as few words as possible: global dominion by the few and total control of the masses.

As explained by Nass, the COVID pandemic showed us that the technocratic cabal has control over most if not all Western governments. World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab has even bragged about how his Young Global Leaders have “penetrated” governments of the world.6

The technocratic cabal also has control over the bureaucratic structure of the WHO. Eighty-five percent of the WHO’s funding comes from private entities, most of which is earmarked for specific programs. “So, the WHO is already owned by private interests,” Nass says.

According to the WHO, the reason the COVID pandemic got so bad is because nations failed to cooperate. Hence, the reasoning goes, we need an international treaty that centralizes pandemic response powers to the WHO. The problem, of course, is that most nations did follow the WHO’s irrational and unscientific recommendations. Its ineptitude — whether intentional or not — is what destroyed economies and resulted in needless deaths.

Based on the current treaty draft and proposed IHR amendments, it’s clear that mRNA-based vaccinations will be mandatory under the WHO’s power structure, and these vaccines will be made in 100 days rather than 10 years by skipping human trials and shaving safety and efficacy testing down to the bare bones.

The WHO will also decide which medications can be used in medical emergencies, and which you cannot have. In other words, the WHO director-general will decide the health care for every person in every member state, and your local doctor will be required to follow his edicts. You’ll have no medical freedom or bodily autonomy anymore.

Nations will also be forced to implement massive nationwide biosurveillance programs to identify potential pathogens with pandemic potential. This will include swabbing and testing humans, domesticated animals, farm animals, wildlife, farms, factories, wastewater and more, and the chances of finding a pathogen with pandemic potential if searching for it in every nook and cranny of the world are 100%.

The WHO director-general will then have the sole authority to declare a pandemic, or even potential pandemic, at which point all decision-making powers fall under the WHO. However, there are no standards that must be met before a public health emergency can be declared.

The way these documents are written, the director-general can even act on what amounts to hearsay. He doesn’t have to have proof that a pandemic is imminent or in progress. He can act on suspicion. Even more disturbing, the treaty will be in force all the time, so the director-general doesn’t even need to declare an emergency. He will have the authority to dictate public health even when there’s no pandemic. That’s how far-reaching this treaty is.

Nations will also be required to surveil and censor social media. The WHO’s narrative will be the only one allowed. YouTube has already implemented this policy, even though the treaty is not even in place yet.

The History of Biological Warfare and How We Got Here

Nass also reviews the history of biological weapons and why we’re in a situation now where most of the pandemics that have occurred are basically the result of biological weapons development.

In 1969, President Nixon announced the U.S. would end its offensive biowarfare program. This was a strategic rather than altruistic move, because the U.S. was far ahead of other nations when it came to chemical and nuclear weapons. By banning biological weapons, which are relatively simple and inexpensive to create, the U.S. would gain a strategic advantage on the global stage.

Nixon initiated the first global treaty to prevent the creation and use of biological weapons in 1972. The Biological Weapons Convention took effect three years later, in 1975. However, in 1973, genetic engineering was discovered, which suddenly allowed the U.S. to gain a technological advantage that would allow us to make better and more precise biological weapons.

The problem with the Biological Weapons Convention is that there’s no enforcement. To be effective and verifiable, a nation needs to be able to challenge another nation and have the right to carry out inspections, and add sanctions in cases of noncompliance. But this enforcement method was not included, and the U.S. has blocked all efforts to add enforcement articles to the treaty since 1991. So, as explained by Nass:7

“Under the guise of preparing their defenses against biowarfare and pandemics, nations have conducted ‘dual-use’ (both offensive and defensive) research and development, which has led to the creation of more deadly and more transmissible microorganisms. And employing new verbiage to shield this effort from scrutiny, biological warfare research was named ‘gain-of-function’ research.”

SARS-CoV-2, for example, appears to be the direct result of gain-of-function research. As noted by Nass, it has “unusual homologies (identical short segments of nucleotides) to human tissues and the HIV virus, which may have caused or contributed to the late autoimmune stage of illness, an impaired immune response and ‘long COVID.’”

As such, SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. David Martin, Ph.D., has also done many interviews, speeches and lectures exposing COVID-19 as a biological warfare crime. https://rumble.com/embed/v2oem0q/?pub=4 Video Link

Are We Funding Public Health or Bioweapons Development?

As noted in Nass’ article, funding for natural epidemics, such as seasonal influenza, has been lumped together with biodefense funding, which hides the cost of our nation’s bioweapons development, because in reality, “biodefense” is “bioweapons development.”

And, while bioweapons development is dangerous and violates the international treaty, biodefense is useless and a complete waste of money, so it’s a lose-lose proposition for taxpayers.

In March 2023, former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield testified before Congress stating that gain-of-function research had never, to his knowledge, resulted in a single beneficial drug, vaccine or therapeutic.8

In other words, while they conduct this research under the guise of “defense,” all gain-of-function research is biological weapons research and has no beneficial public health applications.

The pandemic treaty promotes the proliferation of biological weapons, and opens the door wide to biological weapons research and testing. It will take us in the opposite direction of where we need to go to prevent future pandemics.

The WHO treaty makes matters even worse by requiring member nations to look for pathogens with pandemic potential, and when they find them, to share them, and any research done on them, with everyone else.

So, the WHO treaty quite literally promotes the proliferation of biological weapons, and opens the door wide to biological weapons research and testing. This will also remove the ability to cast blame on any particular nation for starting a pandemic (read unleash a biological weapon), as everyone is working with the same pathogens.

The treaty also requires nations to eliminate administrative hurdles to gain-of-function research on pathogens with pandemic potential, when we really need far more stringent regulations on this type of work, if we’re going to engage in it at all.

So, the WHO treaty will move us in the complete opposite direction of where we actually need to go if we want to prevent future pandemics. To prevent them, we need to stop gain-of-function research, because that’s the greatest pandemic threat out there.

Pandemic Preparedness Is a Smokescreen

Similarly, the idea that the world can prepare ahead of time for a global pandemic is “a smokescreen behind which lies a fascist approach to social management,” Nass writes. She adds:9

“There’s no known way to prevent pandemics, and the methods that governments are spending money on are actually going to make this problem a great deal worse.

The concept of a ‘response’: withholding cheap, available generic drugs in favor of the warp speed development of patentable drugs and vaccines, which will undergo minimal testing and have no liability, is another disaster in the making.”

Our Health Agencies Are Selling Us Out

Importantly, the U.S. government — including our health agencies — have been central in developing and writing these documents, which strips us of our sovereignty as a nation, bodily autonomy as a people, along with freedom, human rights and democracy in general.

Indeed, the IHR amendments specifically remove the need to respect “human rights, dignity and freedom of persons” during public health emergencies. This deletion did not go unnoticed, however, and after severe criticism, language “guaranteeing” human rights was inserted into the latest draft (the Bureau draft) of the pandemic treaty.

The bottom line is, our health agencies are not protecting us. They’re controlled by private, globalist interests, and they’re selling us out.

We also see this in the way the U.S. health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Food and Drug Administration refused to course correct once it became clear that the COVID shots were not preventing infection or transmission, and were causing historically high rates of injuries.

Instead, they doubled down and imposed mandates, and started fiddling with database algorithms to hide the extent of injuries and deaths. Likewise, the WHO is working on an international vaccine passport, even though the entire premise for it has been eliminated. If the shots don’t prevent infection or transmission, then what good does proof of “vaccination” do?

Same with the masks. No matter how much scientific evidence was thrown at them, health authorities refused to admit that masks don’t work and pushed for wearing two or three masks instead. And what can we say about the worldwide recommendation to treat only advanced-stage infection? It’s medicine 101 to treat a condition as early as possible, especially when it comes to infections.

As noted by Nass, “There can be no question about it: Our health agencies are guilty of malfeasance, misrepresentation and deliberate infliction of harm on their own populations.”

All the basic rules of medicine were tossed out during COVID, and under the pandemic treaty, common sense and basic medical facts will be ousted forever. Nass goes through much more in her article, so I urge you to read it10 in its entirety.

The Timeline

The IHR amendments will only require a 50% vote of whoever is in the room at the time of the vote, which will take place at the World Health Assembly’s annual meeting, May 22 through 24, 2024.11 The amendments will take effect 10 months later for any nation that does not opt out.

Nations that have not officially opted out will then be bound by the new terms laid out in the amendments. The pandemic treaty will also be voted on during that meeting. It will require two-thirds vote in favor by the members that are in the room and will go into effect as soon as 30 nations have ratified it.

Thirty days after that, the treaty will go into effect for all the nations that have signed on. Any nation that has not signed the treaty will be excluded from its terms. Those who sign the treaty must wait three years before they can get out.

Door To Freedom

To prevent this nightmare, Nass has founded a new organization called Door To Freedom (doortofreedom.org), which seeks to educate people around the world about what the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will change life as we know it, and strip us of every vestige of freedom.

Door To Freedom has created a poster to explain the impacts the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will have. Please download this poster and share it with everyone you know. Also put it up on public billboards and places where communities share information.

Other Action Items

While the situation seems incredibly bleak, Nass insists there are many things we can do to prevent the WHO’s power grab, including the following:

• Call your congressman or congresswoman and urge them to sponsor H.R.79 — The WHO Withdrawal Act,12 introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, which calls for defunding and exiting the WHO. At the time of this writing, it has 51 cosponsors, all of them Republicans. We cannot get this bill passed without Democrats, so we need to get them to understand what’s at stake.

The Sovereignty Coalition is making it easier for everyone to make their voices heard. Its Help the House Defund the WHO page will allow you to contact all of your elected representatives with just a few clicks. Simply fill out the required field, click submit, and your contact information will be used to match you with your elected representatives.

• Also urge your congressman or congresswoman to sponsor H.R.1425,13 which would require the pandemic treaty to be approved by the Senate. It currently has 27 cosponsors.

• Call your senators and urge them to sponsor the Senate version of H.R.1425, which is S.444, the No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act.14 It currently has 47 cosponsors.

• Share Door To Freedom’s educational poster15 everywhere you can, and direct them to doortofreedom.org for more information. Also share, share, share information about the IHR amendments and how they will destroy national sovereignty, and increase surveillance and censorship. You can find a quick summary here.

Sources and References

SOURCE

Photo: pixabay.com

Health, News

Merck Partnered with Moderna in 2019 to Vaccinate America’s Farms Using mRNA Technology

2 Comments

From mercola.com. As previously noted Dr Mercola’s posts have a 48 hour limit then they are archived to subbed readers. The article is reproduced here in its entirety, with no source link. If you are interested in his articles you can sub for free and each has a link halfway down the article to download in pdf form. Finally, beware they are weaponizing your food. And have been doing so for some time. EWR

Story at-a-glance

  • For the last couple of years, I’ve recommended not eating pork due to its high linoleic acid (LA) content, but there’s an even bigger reason to avoid it now. Since 2018, pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds
  • The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year
  • CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016
  • The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing
  • Americans have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows. Lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef
  • Missouri House bill 1169 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. It would also require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene-altering interventions, and asserts that fully informed consent must be given for all vaccines, gene therapies and medical interventions

For the last couple of years, I’ve recommended not eating pork due to its high linoleic acid (LA) content, but there’s an even bigger reason to avoid it now. Since 2018,1 pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds, and this has slipped completely under the radar. I myself just found out about it. As described on Merck’s animal health website:2

“A revolutionary swine vaccine platform, SEQUIVITY harnesses RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines against strains of influenza A virus in swine, porcine circovirus (PCV), rotavirus and beyond. It’s supported by a sophisticated dashboard filled with comprehensive data and insights …

Sequivity is a custom swine vaccine platform … Sequivity only targets swine pathogen gene sequences of interest. Doesn’t replicate or cause disease, delivering pathogen information to the immune system … There’s no need to transfer or handle live material like autogenous, killed or modified live vaccines …

Targets existing and evolving swine pathogens, including diseases not covered by conventional swine vaccines. Allows for the creation of multivalent formulations by blending RNA particles to target multiple swine pathogens in one shot.”

First RNA ‘Vaccine’ for Livestock Licensed in 2012

Merck was not alone in developing veterinary mRNA shots, however. They weren’t even first on the scene, although they later acquired the company that started it all.

The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot, was licensed over a decade ago in 2012, and was developed by Harrisvaccines.3,4 The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015.5 Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year.6,7

CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016.8 (On a side note, they began conducting human rabies shot trials in 2020 in response to the World Health Organization’s goal to achieve “zero human rabies deaths by 2030.”9)

In 2016, Bayer also partnered with BioNTech to develop mRNA “vaccines” for both livestock and pets,10,11 but it doesn’t appear they ever launched anything. So, in retrospect, it appears Americans have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for the past five years, and even more of our meat supply is about to get contaminated with the same treatment.

In addition to the avian influenza RNA shot for chickens licensed in 2015, newer mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are also in the works.12 Iowa State University is also working on an mRNA shot for cows, and lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle,13,14 which might affect both dairy and beef.

Merck and Moderna: Partners in mRNA Jab Race Since 2015

The same year Merck purchased Harrisvaccines (2015), it also entered into a partnership with Moderna to develop a number of undisclosed mRNA “vaccines.” It was slated to be a three-year collaboration, with a one-year optional extension, in which Merck would perform research and development and commercialization of five potential products using Moderna’s mRNA technology. As reported by Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News at the time:15

“Moderna has agreed to design and synthesize the mRNA product candidates directed against selected targets through its mRNA Therapeutics™ platform.

The platform builds on the discovery that modified mRNA can direct the body’s cellular machinery to produce nearly any protein of interest — ranging from native proteins to antibodies and other entirely novel protein constructs with therapeutic activity inside and outside of cells.”

Endless Customization, Zero Safety Testing
Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was one of the products that came out of that partnership. As explained by Merck (both on its website and in the video above), Sequivity is not so much a single vaccine as it is a platform that can be endlessly customized — all without additional safety analyses over and beyond the initial ridiculously inadequate testing. As noted by Zoetis, the largest producer of veterinary drugs and vaccines:16
“Sequivity has safety and efficacy studies based on the platform with a historical initial isolate, not likely the isolate that customers would be requesting in their product.”
Sequivity is customized as follows:17
Pathogen is collected and sent to a diagnostic lab.
The gene of interest is sequenced and sent electronically to Sequivity analysts.
A synthetic version of the gene of interest is synthesized and inserted into the RNA production platform.
The RNA particles released from incubated production cells are harvested and formulated into a customized “vaccine.”
Using this platform, a customized “vaccine” can be created in as little as eight weeks. Now, what could go wrong by not testing every new shot for safety?
In my view, there are any number of safety hazards, as every pathogen has distinct effects, and tricking the animal’s body to produce that pathogen (or a pathogenic portion of that pathogen, as done with SARS-CoV-2) can have wildly unexpected side effects.
We’ve clearly seen this with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in humans. Pfizer’s own documentation lists 158,000 recorded side effects, and many of these diseases and conditions have never before been reported in response to a vaccine.
I reviewed this evidence in “Newly Released Pfizer Documents Reveal COVID Jab Dangers” and “CDC Aware of Hundreds of Safety Signals for COVID Jab.” Yet despite the obvious risks, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has gone ahead and authorized updated COVID shots to be released on an annual basis without additional safety testing, and apparently safety testing of mRNA shots used in animals was foregone nearly five years ago!
The risk of dangerous side effects is one of the reasons why not all conventional vaccines work out. Some simply cause too many problems. Now we’re to believe that the possibility for dangerous side effects doesn’t exist just because we’re forcing the body to produce the antigen internally? If anything, the possibility for problems is higher than ever, as exposure to the antigen is continuous for a long period of time, possibly for the life of the animal.
Even Organic Pork Producers Can Use mRNA Shots
Unfortunately, due to search engines now only providing a short list of curated and heavily censored content, it’s been impossible to determine how many pork producers in the U.S. use Sequivity.
Without that data, I recommend erring on the safe side and avoiding pork altogether, including organic pork, as organic standards do not have any rules on the use of vaccines, mRNA-based or otherwise.18
Seeing how the Sequivity platform has been around for nearly five years already, it seems reasonable to assume nearly all large-scale swine producers have made this transition.
What Do the Cells in mRNA-Treated Meat Contain?
The question now is, how do mRNA shots affect the meat? For now, this is speculative, as we do not know whether veterinary mRNA shots are substituting uridine with pseudouridine, as was done in the COVID shots. But if they do, then one of the obvious concerns would be that the mRNA might end up in the final meat product that you eat because this substitution makes it extremely difficult to destroy. As explained by Dr. Peter McCullough:19
“Natural RNA is made of two purines adenine and guanine and two pyrimidines cytosine and uracil.
The replacement of uracil with its ribose ring (uridine) with N-1-methyl-pseudouridine, a synthetic product makes the genetic code for the Wuhan Spike protein better stabilized on lipid nanoparticles, long-lasting, and very efficient in terms of evading cellular destruction and able to undergo repeat reading by ribosomes for continued protein synthesis.
Morais et al20 indicate that both Pfizer and Moderna chose development strategies replacing all uridine units with pseudouridine, making the entire strand completely ‘unnatural’ to the human body. Thus vaccine consultants, companies, and patients unfortunately gambled on how long mRNA would be active within the human body.
Fertig et al21 found lipid nanoparticles with mRNA were measurable in plasma for — 15 days. Recently, Castruita et al22 demonstrated mRNA in blood out to 28 days. Röltgen et al23 have found mRNA in lymph nodes 60 days after injection.
None of these studies demonstrated complete clearance of mRNA from a group of patients.
This is worrisome since injections are recommended in some populations just a few months apart implying there will be stacking of long-lasting mRNA in the body without adequate opportunity for clearance and elimination.
We will look back for many years and ask: how could so many people readily accept injections of heavily modified synthetic genetic code giving the body instructions to manufacture a disease promoting and lethal protein engineered in a biosecurity lab in Wuhan, China?
Repeated administrations of mRNA studded with apparently indestructible pseudouridine may have changed the course of lives forever.”
If mRNA shots can cause significant disease in humans, how has it affected our pork supply for the last five years? And how will it affect beef and chicken in the future? Can consuming genetically manipulated meat affect your health? These are questions that currently do not have answers and must be thoroughly and comprehensively investigated.
Big Ag Didn’t Tell Us What They Were Doing
One of the most frustrating aspects of this is that the industry didn’t tell us they were using novel gene therapy to spin up customized “vaccines” in weeks without any safety testing. The only reason many of us became aware of this issue in recent weeks was because attorney Tom Renz started warning about it.
Missouri House bill 1169 would require labeling of products that have the ability to alter your genetics. It would also require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene altering interventions.
In an April 2, 2023, Substack article, he wrote:24
“I have been talking about gene therapy vaccines being introduced into the food supply without providing people informed consent on my Twitter account … as well as pushing Missouri HB1169 which is our best bet of stopping this happening.
This is a nightmare scenario whereby people’s genetics are potentially altered with ‘factory foods’ without them even knowing. Let me begin by putting to rest any questions as to whether this can happen. The idea of vaccines in food has been around for a long time …
Here is an article published in the NIH25 (you know — by our government) talking about foods ‘under application’ to be genetically modified to become edible vaccines — FROM 2013 … The fact that food can be altered to act as a vaccine is not disputable.
Which foods and in what ways is more of a question. It is claimed that beef, pork, etc. cannot transfer vaccination from the meat to the consumer of the meat. At initial glance that would make sense (cow DNA and people DNA is quite different and an mRNA designed for cows would probably not be able to transfer directly to people), but that is NOT the whole story.
You have to remember that the additives in the mRNA vaccines are by no means ‘proven safe’ and we don’t even actually know what all is in these shots … Ultimately the mRNA jabs still have not undergone long-term testing because long-term testing can take 10-20 years and they have not existed that long so any claims about the safety or efficacy of the stuff that’s in them are garbage at best.
What we do know about the mRNA vaccines is that they do not stop the spread of disease26 … and really do not help in any way with anything. We also do know that these jabs were demonstrated, in vitro, to alter the genetic makeup of some cells and I would say it is incredibly likely that they do the outside the Petri dish.
Given that we are now talking about a new level of genetic engineering with unknown effects and no long-term studies, do the potential genetic changes the mRNA injections facilitate pose a long-term risk to humans that ingest the altered food? Before you say no, wouldn’t you prefer it be tested rather than being the subject of the experiment?”
Support Missouri House Bill 1169
As noted by Renz, Missouri House Bill 116927 would require labeling of products that can alter your genes. It also asserts that fully informed consent must be given for all vaccines, gene therapies and medical interventions, and would require companies to share information about the potential transmissibility of gene-altering interventions.
The pushback by industry against this bill has been enormous, which should tell you something. It doesn’t ban anything; it only requires transparency. That, apparently, is a serious threat to industry, and the most obvious reason for that is because they’d have to admit that all sorts of foods can have gene altering effects.
Not only might this destroy Big Ag, but it would also decimate any surreptitious attempts by Big Pharma to use the food supply as a tool to distribute vaccines unbeknownst to consumers. As noted by Renz, “Big pharma DOES NOT WANT people to know they are going to use food to alter their genetics.” Farmers are also being set up as the fall guys, and they need to be made aware of this.
“The lobbyists opposing this bill … are pushing to shut this bill down because factory mega-farmers like Bill Gates,28 the CCP, and others want to put vaccines in your food,” Renz continues.29 “These guys are supporting the big money but this will come at the expense of the family farmers.
The problem is that the major factory-farmers like Gates have legal teams that can set up defense shields against the torts that may come if the food supply starts poisoning people … 
Meanwhile, the small farmers will be at risk of being sued if it turns out that the food they are selling is unsafe despite the fact that most of them will not necessarily know what is happening.
If the corn growers, soybean, cattle, and pork associations actually cared about the farmers they would be demanding the seed companies and vaccine manufacturers indemnify the small farmers for these products rather than opposing a bill that would force them to tell the farmers what they are doing.
The corruption regarding this bill is amazing. Ultimately the labeling requirement would likely serve to protect farmers from being sued because the makers of seed and vaccines would have to make sure the farmers knew if they were putting potential gene therapies into their products. The opposition from the ag lobby is not to help the farmers, it is to help their own pockets.”
As noted by Renz, if this bill is passed in Missouri, it could help protect the food supply of the entire United States. In the meantime, I recommend avoiding all pork products, including organic ones, as they not only have high levels of the omega-6 fat, linoleic acid, because of the grains they are fed, but virtually all have been contaminated with the mRNA vaccines for the past five years.

Think Globally, Act Locally
National vaccine policy recommendations in the U.S. are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.
It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being seriously threatened.
Not only are lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations and public health officials trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws, but global political operatives lobbying the United Nations and World Health Organization are determined to take away the human right to autonomy and protection of bodily integrity.
We must take action to defend our constitutional republic and civil liberties, including the right to autonomy, in America. That includes reforming oppressive mandatory vaccination laws and stopping the digital health ID that will make vaccine passports a reality for us, our children and grandchildren if we don’t take action today.
Signing up to use the free online Advocacy Portal sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state and federal legislators on your smartphone or computer so you can make your voice heard.
NVIC will keep you up to date on the latest bills threatening to eliminate — or expand — your legal right to make vaccine choices and give you guidance about what you can do to support or oppose those bills. So, please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN!
Share Your Story With Your Legislators and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury or death, please talk about it. If we don’t share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up.
If you want to protect your legal right to say “no” to vaccines you do not believe are safe or effective, make an appointment to personally talk with someone you have elected to office at the local, state and federal level or write a letter in your own words stating your concerns.
Attend school board and city council and town hall meetings in your community that will impact your right to know and freedom to make decisions about how you or your children will live and stay healthy. If you have a different perspective on a story about vaccination that appears in your local newspaper, write a letter to the editor.
I must be frank with you: You have to be brave because there is a lot of censorship of conversations that challenge “official” narratives about vaccination. You likely will be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the “other side” of the vaccine story and for defending your informed consent rights. Be prepared for it and have the courage to stand your ground.
Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.
While our rights are being threatened, the vaccine injured are being swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than statistically acceptable “collateral damage” of one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination laws. Way too many people are being put at risk for injury and death and there is nothing scientific or moral about that. We should not be treating human beings like guinea pigs.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the four websites of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org, a nonprofit charity that has been educating the public about the need to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths since 1982. The information you get on their websites is fully referenced and will help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your community:
NVIC.org — This website was established in 1995 and is the oldest and largest consumer operated website publishing information on diseases and vaccines on the internet. Learn about vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths and the history and current status of vaccine science, policy, law and ethics in the U.S. on more than 2,000 web pages.
NVICAdvocacy.org — This communications and advocacy network, established in 2010, is your gateway to taking action to protect your right to make vaccine choices where you live.
TheVaccineReaction.org — This weekly journal newspaper published by NVIC since 2015 is dedicated to encouraging an “enlightened conversation about vaccination, health and autonomy.”
MedAlerts.org — This is a user-friendly search engine for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and sponsored by NVIC since 2006. Search for descriptions of vaccine injuries and deaths reported to VAERS on this popular website.
Find A Doctor Who Will Listen and Care
If your doctor or pediatrician refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don’t want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, coercion and refusal to provide medical care to someone declining one or more doses of government recommended vaccines is a violation of the informed consent ethic.
Unfortunately, it is becoming routine among members of the medical establishment to be reluctant to share vaccine decision-making power with patients and parents of minor children, especially during the aggressive push for all Americans to get COVID shots.
There are doctors out there who respect the precautionary and informed consent principles, so take the time to locate a doctor who treats you with compassion and is willing to listen and respect the health care choices you make for yourself or your child.

– Sources and References

Photo: EWR

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, News, Vaccines

PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE: Unvaccinated people can be exposed to experimental mRNA from vaccinated people causing frightening adverse reactions

1 Comment

EWR Note: in the video with Dr Tenpenny, she points out that the Spike Protein is transferring from one person to another & that technically it is not shedding. She explains.

From thecovidblog.com

“…unvaccinated women have experienced reproductive issues, including miscarriages, simply by standing near someone who has been injected with experimental mRNA and viral vectors. Mainstream media called the claim “biologically impossible.” But Pfizer’s own literature says otherwise.”

NEW YORK — Those who cannot handle the sight of gruesome human ailments, especially women, stop reading now. What you are about to see and learn is scary and may change the way you live your daily lives.

The Centner Academy is a private K-8 school located in Miami, Florida. It made headlines last week when it announced in an email its new policy that vaccinated teachers will not be employed by the school. Current teachers who already received experimental mRNA and viral vector shots before the announcement are allowed to keep their jobs. But they must keep their (social) distance from students.

READ MORE

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/05/07/pfizer-documents-unvaccinated-people-can-be-exposed-to-experimental-mrna-from-vaccinated-people-frightening-adverse-reactions/

RELATED:

COVID-19 “Vaccine” Bioweapons Update on Spike Proteins being Transmitted from Vaxxed to Unvaxxed People

READ AT LINK:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/covid-19-vaccine-bioweapons-update-on-spike-proteins-being-transmitted-from-vaxxed-to-unvaxxed-people/

Hear Dr Sherri Tenpenny speaking and warning on topic; she cites the cases she has seen of very young children including a toddler bleeding vaginally from contact at her pre school. Also men with testicular swelling & unable to maintain an erection:

Posted @ fb

“PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE.
It’s not long but extremely important, and of course as we all know many MANY V specialists and doctors around the world are screaming about this.
The numbers quoted by specialist Dr Tenpenny are only the ones in reported in the US of course, so we know in our own countries this is happening en masse too, regardless of “which jab” people keep thinking matters..
Make sure to screenrecord it and KEEP REPOSTING IT EVERYWHERE. SEND IT TO YOUR PARENTS, your DOCTORS, your parliamentary ministers and schools and clinics, your LOVED ONES.. SIT DOWN AND MAKE EVERYONE YOU KNOW LISTEN!! Stop waiting for gov/ pharma sponsored studies and announcements from BS mainstream propaganda channels when actual SPECIALISTS IN THIS SPECIFIC FIELD and so many other doctors, nurses and well-researched and well-informed citizens have been screaming about this and getting cεnsored for so many months. PLEASE.
Let’s awaken and save who we can before it’s absolutely too late”.
Christina Jonas

https://www.facebook.com/100069060427464/videos/105281088450572/

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, News, Vaccines

Spike protein is very dangerous, it’s cytotoxic (Robert Malone, Steve Kirsch, Bret Weinstein)

2 Comments

DarkHorse Podcast Clips
160K subscribers
Spike protein is very dangerous, it’s cytotoxic. Clip from DarkHorse podcast. Full livestream here: https://youtu.be/-_NNTVJzqtY
Bitchute for backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TH2HAm…

Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.
Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines.

Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatment and the COVID vaccines.

Steve’s paper on COVID vaccine reactions: https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-…
Steve’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/stkirsch
COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund: https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve…

Dr. Malone’s website: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/mrna-vacci…
Robert’s LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rwmalonemd
Robert’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD

Find Bret Weinstein on Twitter: @BretWeinstein, and on Patreon.
https://www.patreon.com/bretweinstein
https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein

Please subscribe to this channel for more long form content like this, and subscribe to the clips channel @DarkHorse Podcast Clips for short clips of all our podcasts.

DarkHorse merchandise now available at: store.darkhorsepodcast.org

Theme Music: Thank you to Martin Molin of Wintergatan for providing us the rights to use their excellent music.

WATCH AT THE LINK:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY

Corona virus, News, Vaccines

Dr Meryl Nass DETAILS POSSIBLE FDA/CDC CRIMES – In the legal world of FDA, ‘safe & effective’ only applies to licensed drugs, not UNLICENSED ones

Leave a comment

Listen at the link:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZptPZEGhxtrD/

Corona virus, Medical, News

An open letter from UK GP’s to the English government, explaining why THE CV VX IS UNECESSARY AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS FOR CHILDREN

1 Comment

We wish to notify you of our grave concerns regarding all proposals to administer COVID-19 vaccines to children. Recently leaked Government documents suggested that a COVID-19 vaccine rollout in children over 12 years old is already planned for September 2021, and the possibility of children as young as 5 years old being vaccinated in the summer in a worst-case scenario.1

We have been deeply disturbed to hear several Government and SAGE representatives calling in the media for the COVID-19 vaccine rollout to be “turning to children as fast as we can”.2 Teaching materials circulated to London schools contain emotionally loaded questions and inaccuracies3. In addition, there has been disturbing language used by teaching union leaders, implying that coercion of children to accept the COVID-19 vaccines through peer pressure in schools was to be encouraged, despite the fact that coercion to accept a medical treatment is against UK and International Laws and Declarations.4 Rhetoric such as this is irresponsible and unethical, and encourages the public to demand the vaccination of minors with a product still at the research stage and about which no medium- or long-term effects are known, against a disease which presents no material risk to them. A summary of our reasons is given below and a more detailed fully referenced explanation is available.5

Risks and benefits in medical treatments
Vaccines, like any other medical treatment, come with varied risks and benefits. Therefore, we must consider each product, individually, on its merits, and specifically for which patients or sections of the population is the risk/benefit ratio acceptable. For COVID-19 vaccines, the potential benefits are clear for the elderly and vulnerable, however, for children, the balance of benefit and risk would be quite different. We are raising these concerns as part of an informed debate, which is a vital part of the proper, scientific process. We must ensure that there is no repeat of any past tragedies which have occurred especially when vaccines are rushed to market. For example, the swine flu vaccine, Pandemrix, rolled out following the pandemic of 2010, resulted in over one thousand cases of narcolepsy, a devastating brain injury, in children and teenagers, before being withdrawn.6 Dengvaxia, a new vaccine against Dengue, was also rolled out to children ahead of the full trial outcomes, and 19 children died of possible antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) before the vaccine was withdrawn.7 We must not risk a repeat of this with the COVID-19 vaccines, which would not only impact on the children and families affected, but would also have a hugely damaging effect on vaccination uptake in general.

No medical intervention should be introduced on a ‘one size fits all’ basis, but instead should be fully assessed for suitability according to the characteristics of the age cohort and of the individuals concerned, weighing up the risk versus benefit profile for each cohort and the individuals within a group. This approach was outlined last October, by the head of the Government Vaccine Task Force, Kate Bingham, who said “We just need to vaccinate everyone at risk. There’s going to be no vaccination of people under 18. It’s an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable.”8

Children do not need vaccination for their own protection
Healthy children are at almost no risk from COVID-19, with risk of death as low as 1 in 2.5 million9. No previously healthy child under the age of 15 died during the pandemic in the UK and admissions to hospital or intensive care are exceedingly rare10 with most children having no or very mild symptoms. Although Long-Covid has been cited as a reason for vaccinating children, there is little hard data. It appears less common and much shorter-lived than in adults and none of the vaccine trials have studied this outcome11 12. The inflammatory condition, PIMS, was listed as a potential adverse effect in the Oxford AstraZeneca children’s trial13. Naturally acquired immunity will give broader and better lasting immunity than vaccination14. Indeed, many children will already be immune15. Individual children at very high risk can already receive vaccination on compassionate grounds16.

Children do not need vaccination to support herd immunity
Already, two thirds of the adult population have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine17. Models that assume vaccination of children is required to reach herd immunity have failed to account for the proportion who had immunity prior to March 2020 and those who have acquired it naturally18. Recent modelling suggested that the UK had achieved the required herd immunity threshold on 12 April 2021.19

Children do not transmit SARS-CoV-2 as readily as adults, moreover adults living or working with young children are at lower risk of severe COVID-1920. Schools have not been shown to be the focus on spread to the community, teachers have a lower risk of COVID-19 than other working age adults21.

Short-term safety concerns
As of 13th May, the MHRA22 has received a total of 224,544 adverse events, including 1,145 deaths in association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Reports of strokes due to cerebral venous thromboses were initially in low numbers but as awareness increased, many more reports led to the conclusion that AstraZeneca vaccine should not be used for adults under 40 years of age and this unpredicted finding has also led to the suspension of the Oxford AstraZeneca children’s trial.

Similar events have been noted with Pfizer & Moderna vaccines on the US adverse reporting system (VAERS)23 and it is likely that this is a class effect related to production of spike protein. New UK guidelines on managing Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT)24 include all COVID-19 vaccines in their advice. The possibility of further unexpected safety issues cannot be ruled out. In Israel, where the vaccines have been widely rolled out to young people and teenagers, the Pfizer vaccine has been linked to several cases of myocarditis in young men25 and concerns have been raised about reports of altered menstrual cycles and abnormal bleeding in young women following the vaccine.26

Most concerning with regard to possible vaccination of children, is that there have now been a number of deaths associated with vaccination reported to VAERS in the US, despite the vaccines only being given to children within trials and a very recent rollout to 16-17 year olds27.

Long-term safety concerns
All Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials are ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022/early 2023. The vaccines are, therefore, currently experimental with only limited short-term and no long-term adult safety data available. In addition, many are using a completely new mRNA vaccine technology, which has never previously been approved for use in humans28. The mRNA is effectively a pro-drug and it is not known how much spike protein any individual will produce. Potential late-onset effects can take months or years to become apparent. The limited children’s trials undertaken to date are totally underpowered to rule out uncommon but severe side effects.

Children have a lifetime ahead of them, and their immunological and neurological systems are still in development, making them potentially more vulnerable to adverse effects than adults. A number of specific concerns have been raised already, including autoimmune disease and possible effects on placentation and fertility.29 A recently published paper raised the possibility that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could trigger prion-based, neurodegenerative disease30. All potential risks, known and unknown, must be balanced against risks of COVID-19 itself, so a very different benefit/risk balance will apply to children than to adults.

Conclusion
There is important wisdom in the Hippocratic Oath which states, “First do no harm”. All medical interventions carry a risk of harm, so we have a duty to act with caution and proportionality. This is particularly the case when considering mass intervention in a healthy population, in which situation there must be firm evidence of benefits far greater than harms. The current, available evidence clearly shows that the risk versus benefit calculation does NOT support administering rushed and experimental COVID-19 vaccines to children, who have virtually no risk from COVID-19, yet face known and unknown risks from the vaccines. The Declaration of the Rights of the Child states that, “the child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care,
including appropriate legal protection”.31 As adults we have a duty of care to protect children from unnecessary and foreseeable harm.

We conclude that it is irresponsible, unethical and indeed, unnecessary, to include children under 18 years in the national COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Clinical trials in children also pose huge ethical dilemmas, in light of the lack of potential benefit to trial participants and the unknown risks. The end of the current Phase 3 trials should be awaited as well as several years of safety data in adults, to rule out, or quantify, all potential adverse effects.

We call upon our governments and the regulators not to repeat mistakes from history, and to reject the calls to vaccinate children against COVID-19. Extreme caution has been exercised over many aspects of the pandemic, but surely now is the most important time to exercise true caution – we must not be the generation of adults that, through unnecessary haste and fear, risks the health of children.

Signatories

Dr Rosamond Jones, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician
Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary undersecretary
of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine
Prof Anthony Fryer, PhD, FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University
Professor Karol Sikora, MA, MBBChir, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FFPM, Dean of Medicine, Buckingham
University, Professor of Oncology
Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges
Hospital London
Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh
Professor Anthony J Brookes, Department of Genetics & Genome Biology, University of Leicester
Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London
Dr John A Lee, MBBS, PhD, FRCPath, retired Consultant Histopathologist, former Clinical Professor
of Pathology at Hull York Medical School
Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH (ret). Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology
Dr Elizabeth Evans, MA, MBBS, DRCOG, retired doctor
Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS (Gen Surg). MIHM, VR. Consultant Surgeon
Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD, Microbiologist
Dr C Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician
Dr K Singh, MBChB, MRCGP, general practitioner
Dr Pauline Jones MB BS retired general practitioner
Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant physician, Croydon University Hospital
Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD, 32 years in pharmaceutical R&D as a clinical research scientist.
Dr Padma Kanthan, MBBS, General practitioner
Dr Thomas Carnwath, MBBCh,MA, FRCPsych, FRCGP, consultant psychiatrist
Dr Sam McBride BSc(Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical
Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP(Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics
Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, general practitioner
Dr M A Bell, MBChB, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, UK
Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist
Dr Jayne LM Donegan MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, general practitioner
Dr Dayal Mukherjee, MBBS MSc
Dr Clare Craig, BM,BCh, FRCPath, Pathologist
Mr C P Chilton, MBBS, FRCS, Consultant urologist emeritus
Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath
Dr Jason Lester, MRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Rutherford Cancer Centre, Newport
Dr Scott McLachan, FAIDH, MCSE, MCT, DSysEng, LLM, MPhil., Postdoctoral researcher, Risk &
Information management Group
Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational health practitioner
Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham
Dr Stephanie Williams, Dermatologist
Dr Greta Mushet, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy. MBChB, MRCPsych
Dr JE, MBChB, BSc, NHS hospital junior doctor
Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London
Dr Elizabeth Corcoran,MBBS,MRCPsych,Psychiatrist,Chair Down’s Syndrome Research Foundation UK
Dr Alan Black, MB BS MSc DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician
Dr Christina Peers, MBBS,DRCOG,DFSRH,FFSRH, Consultant in Contraception & Reproductive Health
Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL
Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, retired general practitioner
Noel Thomas, MA, MB ChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor
Malcolm Sadler, MBBS, FRCGP, retired general practitioner with 37 years in Medical Practice
Dr Ian Bridges, MBBS, Retired general practitioner
Mr T James Royle MBChB, FRCS(Ed), MMedEd, Consultant colorectal surgeon
Dr Fiona Martindale, MbChB, MRCGP, GP in out of hours

Endnotes

  1. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9502227/Coronavirus-UK-Children-young-12-Covid-vaccinesSeptember.html
  2. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9285157/Sage-member-calls-children-Covid-jab-fast-avoid-riskresurgence.html
  3. Critical Thinking Assembly on Vaccines
  4. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/02/schools-back-mass-vaccinations-children-headteachers-saypeer/
  5. https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Covid19_Vaccine_in_Children_FULL_document.pdf
  6. https://www.narcolepsy.org.uk/resources/pandemrix-narcolepsy
  7. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/dengue-vaccine-fiasco-leads-criminal-charges-researcherphilippines
  8. https://www.ft.com/content/d2e00128-7889-4d5d-84a3-43e51355a751
  9. https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/9/e003094.full.pdf
  10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3249
  11. Illness duration and symptom profile in a large cohort of symptomatic UK school-aged children tested for SARS-CoV-2
  12. Post-acute COVID-19 outcomes in children with mild and asymptomatic disease
  13. https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COV006_Participant-Information-Sheet-16-17-years_V2.0_09Feb2021.pdf
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03207-w
  15. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6522/1339
  16. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/priority-groups-for-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination-advicefrom-the-jcvi-30-december-2020/joint-committee-on-vaccination-and-immunisation-advice-on-prioritygroups-for-covid-19-vaccination-30-december-2020
  17. Vaccinations | Coronavirus in the UK (data.gov.uk)
  18. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563?fbclid=IwAR2v7qLBSWYOv4LdJB6ziwvzPaCvrvoaB1uzLQNRTMeCDkHHDo0a6Tsrto
  19. Britain will achieve herd immunity by Monday, according to UCL
  20. Sharing a household with children and risk of CO VID-19: a study of over 300,000 adults living in healthcare worker households in Scotland
  21. https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/2927/report-of-record-linkage-english-december2020.pdf
  22. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
  23. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
  24. Guidance produced from the Expert Haematology Panel (EHP) focussed on Covid-19 Vaccine induced Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia
  25. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-probing-link-between-pfizer-shot-and-heart-problem-in-menunder-30/
  26. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-women-say-covid-vaccines-affect-their-periods-so-whydon-t-doctors-care-1.9754865
  27. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
  28. https://www.immunology.org/coronavirus/connect-coronavirus-public-engagement-resources/typesvaccines-for-covid-19
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y
  30. https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
  31. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx

https://www.hartgroup.org/open-letter-child-vaccination/…

Photo credit: unsplash.com

Corona virus, NZ

Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV VX – meanwhile the MoH website offers no guarantee of safety

4 Comments

“We don’t have enough information” regarding pregnancy and the shot. Why is this not being emphasized? Note also this from a post featuring cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough: “Something I want the reader to think about: Dr. McCullough said that during clinical trials for the “vaccines” pregnant women were not allowed to participate. But now ALL pregnant women are told to get the jab!! And don’t forget, these jabs are not FDA approved. They say it’s an emergency and that’s why they are allowing them without full approval!” SOURCE

(EWR)
________________________________________________________________________

From Lynda Wharton, The Health Forum NZ @ fb

PREGNANT WOMEN AND THE CV VX …
WE JUST DONT KNOW
Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV V.
They are informed by the Government to “speak with your doctor”….
And at the same time, there are numerous platforms assuring us of the “likely safety” of the CV V during pregnancy.
Please forward this photograph to all of your pregnant friends.
It is a screen shot of the actual information on the MOH website…
The truth in plain print right before our eyes:


READ THE INFO AT THE SOURCE

https://www.health.govt.nz/…/covid-19-vaccine-clinical…

____________________________________________________________________

EWR … FYI:

Here is a draft list of possible side effects compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US :

Guillain-Barre syndrome

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Transverse myelitis

Encephalitis

Myelitis

Encephalomyelitis

Meningoencephalitis

Meningitis

Encephalopathy

Convulsions

Seizures

Stroke

Narcolepsy

Cataplexy

Anaphylaxis

Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)

Myocarditis

Pericarditis

Autoimmune disease

Death

Pregnancy, Birth outcomes

Other acute demyelinating diseases

Non anaphylactic allergy reactions

Thromocytopenia

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Venous thromboembolism

Arthritis

Arthralgia

Joint pain

Kawasaki disease

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Vaccine enhanced disease

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.

SOURCE (go to p 17):

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

Photo credit: pixabay.com

Corona virus, News

Other recent headlines

1 Comment

An American paediatrician speaks about the CV VX
https://www.instagram.com/p/COwbmnQHA2r/?fbclid=IwAR0JmqZuoXZS-xvEtPvZ9OW2qXLuMY4b2bAwH_R-vY4RBa-63iffAc9c89E

The Deadly COVID-19 Vaccine Coverup
https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2021/5/4/the-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-coverup?fbclid=IwAR3HPWl-tzfk6DpPeLMWUm1i9_9CKBccvx8UhwrfbhQFuNrfuNexVUa7-BE

Rock and Roll Legend Eric Clapton Regrets COVID Shot, while Others Die Shortly After the Injections
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/rock-and-roll-legend-eric-clapton-regrets-covid-shot-while-others-die-shortly-after-the-injections/

Mandatory mRNA in 2007 movie Vexille: Predictive Programming
https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2021/05/mandatory-mrna-in-2007-movie-vexille-predictive-programming/

Thanks Kim
BRITISH HEALTH CARE EXECUTIVE SAYS BRITISH GOVERNMENT DID NOT INFECT ENOUGH PEOPLE WITH COVID (bitchute.com)

FREUDIAN SLIP? …NEWS REPORTER SAYS THAT THEY’RE RUNNING OUT OF PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE EUTHANIZED (bitchute.com)

Image by Steve Buissinne from Pixabay

Corona virus, Vaccines

Important info on the CV VX fast track approval for your children

3 Comments

From The Health Forum NZ fb page

With the vaccination of our NZ children looming, you might be interested to see how “exceptional circumstances” allow for the fast tracking of the Covid 19 vaccine for children. I recommend you read this after you have had a few alcoholic beverages, or doused yourself in lavender oil.

FDA vs. CDC and the adolescent vaccine

The Pfizer vaccine is now authorized, by the FDA, for emergency use among people aged 12+. In other words, you could go right now and get a vaccine in your 12 year old’s arm (dependent on your state and physician, I’ll get to that in a little). However, the CDC advisory board (called ACIP) has yet to meet (they are meeting Wednesday; here is the agenda). So, what’s going on?
In normal times…
A vaccine sponsor (like Pfizer) would collect at least 6 months of follow-up data from Phase III clinical trials and submit an extensive application to the FDA. Then, the FDA would have 10 months to review, approve, and license. During this time it’s federally mandated that an external review board for the FDA (called VRBPAC) has a meeting. This is where we (the public) get to see the clinical trial data for the first time (hundreds and hundreds of pages). VRBPAC provides a formal recommendation to the FDA.

Then an external committee for the CDC (called ACIP) offers a second recommendation. The CDC Director has to ratify the ACIP decision.
The CDC typically needs to approve for three reasons:
1. Insurance to cover the vaccine
2. Government funds to be adjudicated to pay for the vaccine for uninsured kids (called the Vaccines for Children program)
3. CDC handles the logistics for delivery of vaccine, so they have to formally approve what they are distributing.

In abnormal times…If there’s a pandemic or global emergency, a sponsor can apply for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). The sponsor only needs 2 months of follow-up clinical trial data to apply. Then, the rest of the process is basically the same. When a sponsor applies for a EUA, it’s under the assumption that the sponsor will apply for a full license once they have the follow-up data (showing vaccine longevity, continued safety) and necessary documents (like manufacturing processes). Then the FDA has 6-10 months to review. This is where the adult Pfizer vaccine is right now.

But this is abnormal times…
The adolescent vaccine is NOT a new EUA; it’s an extension or an amendment of the adult EUA. So, the FDA doesn’t require a VRBPAC meeting. The FDA internally reviewed data and deemed it safe and effective for emergency use (which led to today’s announcement).
The ACIP meets Wednesday, which is basically a formality. Importantly, though, we (the public) will get to see some data. In some states, only pediatricians can give vaccines to kiddos (not pharmacies). Also, a LOT of physicians will still wait for the ACIP recommendation. So, this CDC meeting is still an important step.
Bottom line: The Pfizer vaccine is officially authorized for patients. We will still get a lot of new and important information on Wednesday.
I hope I didn’t make this already confusing process even more confusing.
Love, YLEData sources on my newsletter here: https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/…/fda-vs…Post reproduced from
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100053149454347

Corona virus, legal, NZ Government

Snippets from the High Court Vax Challenge (KTI, Sue Grey)

Leave a comment
WATCH AT THE LINK: https://rumble.com/vh3heh-snippets-from-the-high-court-vax-challenge.html?fbclid=IwAR3jhwI_QKX8MC2wGCs2DA-YGwbUDOHJo3KwHzSWzoJNOpcGQ40EvTh-AvI

Snippets from some who were there Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Medical Society Inc v Minister of Health, Prime Minister and others 12 May 2021 High Court Wellington For more information please see www.kti.org.nz.

Corona virus, Vaccines

Why are magnets sticking to where people got CV VXes injected?

3 Comments

From the TimTruth Odyssee video channel

Watch at this link: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Magneticcovidvaxarm-1:6?src=open&fbclid=IwAR3hWl4i5MJ10icGyM8Bet8oGGXOPQbKo2kB9lc28Qtl02W_Rocv6_aDMi8

A long succession of demos of the magnet sticking to the vax site in the arms… if you fast forward you will see readings of the sites on emf meters (elevated predictably for vxed versus unvxed) … and data on metallic taste in the mouth as a possible side effect. Make of it what you will. If nothing else I’m reminded of the metals found in vxes for years that folk have highlighted with their brain damaged babies … completely ignored of course or blamed for ‘maltreating’ their infants. They’ve also been filling our teeth with mercury for years and years ignoring that it’s a hazardous substance. No thanks.

_____________________________________________________________________

Tim Truth@TimTruthFollow

Join our leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com

to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon. Coupon code noforcedmeds 40% off, recurring discount! (limited time offer)

Add me on these great platforms: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/https://bitchute.com/timtruth/https://GroupDiscover.com and https://flote.app/timtruth1Brought to you by the great supporters of this channel who fund this research. Join us on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/timtruth for exclusive content, censored videos and to help me make this channel even better.

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction

Pfizer documents: unvaccinated people can be exposed to experimental mRNA from vaccinated people; frightening adverse reactions

1 Comment

via thecovidblog.com

NEW YORK — Those who cannot handle the sight of gruesome human ailments, especially women, stop reading now. What you are about to see and learn is scary and may change the way you live your daily lives.

The Centner Academy is a private K-8 school located in Miami, Florida. It made headlines last week when it announced in an email its new policy that vaccinated teachers will not be employed by the school. Current teachers who already received experimental mRNA and viral vector shots before the announcement are allowed to keep their jobs. But they must keep their (social) distance from students.

Mainstream media located all the mask and experimental shot lovers at the school to trash the owners. They even dug up an attorney, Mark Richard, who told the Tampa Bay Times that the policy barring the shots could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The journalists, Colleen Wright and Nicholas Nehamas, failed to ask the obvious follow-up question – if barring shots violates the ADA, does forcing people to get experimental shots against their wills also violate the ADA?

READ MORE

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/05/07/pfizer-documents-unvaccinated-people-can-be-exposed-to-experimental-mrna-from-vaccinated-people-frightening-adverse-reactions/

Image by x3 from Pixabay

Corona virus, News, Vaccines

Ways mRNA CV Vaccines Could Harm the Unvaccinated Explored In Depth [LIVESTREAM REPLAY]

Leave a comment

If you are concerned as I am about future contact with those who have taken the experimental treatment, this is an excellent source of info on topic. EWR

Read & listen at the link:

Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder

This is an exclusive replay of a livestream which broadcast 5 PM EST, May 1st. 

How concerned should we be that the newly vaccinated might adversely affect our health? What can we do? Sayer Ji shares the perspective of the New Biology, referencing horizontal information transfer (microvessicle shedding), and the Pfizer trial protocol that addresses vaccine bystander effects. Referenced links include:

www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/miami-school-asks-staff-not-take-covid-jab-global-media-assault-follows-pfizer-tra1 
https://www.standforhealthfreedom.com 
and
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/newsletter

If you like this video, please share it! YOU are the new mainstream media.

Give Leila and Centner Academy some love here:
https://centneracademy.com/ 
https://www.instagram.com/p/CONTDvSLTjI/

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/ways-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-could-harm-unvaccinated-explored-depth-livestream-rep

Photo: pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

A woman who had taken the Pfizer vx wakens paralyzed from her chest down

Leave a comment

https://odysee.com/@HarrisonBergeron:9/WomenParalyzedByPfeizer:3

Photo: pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

Ronald Babb: 57-year-old Syracuse man mocks “anti-vaxxers,” dead seven days after Johnson & Johnson shot

Leave a comment

SYRACUSE, NEW YORK — A 57-year-old husband, father and grandfather is dead, in what is fast becoming a trend of death after social media virtue signaling.

Mr. Ronald Babb, Sr. and his wife Rose, received the experimental Johnson & Johnson viral vector shot on April 12, according to his Facebook page. They received the shot at a Walmart on Genessee Street in Camilius, New York, about 14 miles west of Syracuse. Mr. Babb posted he and his wife’s “vaccine cards” on Facebook with a caption saying they are now waiting to “turn into robots.”

READ MORE:

Ronald Babb: 57-year-old Syracuse man mocks “anti-vaxxers,” dead seven days after Johnson & Johnson shot
Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, News, Vaccines

Johns Hopkins University confirms that “self-spreading” vaccines are real

20 Comments

Thanks to Joyce Bowen’s excellent blog for this link. Just highlighting it for general reading but do check out her more extensive article here.

So we are already hearing of women bleeding menstrually outside of their normal cycle, miscarrying pregnancies, death of breastfed infants and other anomalies after contact with the cv vaxxed. Disturbing… read the article. EWR
************************************************************************

From Dr. Eddy Bettermann MD

Most Americans are saying no to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccines despite the deep state’s best efforts to sway them. It may not matter, though, because the jabs could be self-spreading, meaning the vaccinated could be effectively vaccinating the unvaccinated simply by “shedding” it onto them.

A Johns Hopkins University (JHU) paper explains how self-spreading vaccines work to spread through both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations by design. Even if you forego the jab, in other words, you could still end up becoming vaccinated if someone you come into contact with was recently injected.

Ironically, this makes vaccinated people the true “superspreaders” who are putting society at risk. Since there is still no real proof that viruses even spread through the air at all, who is actually responsible for spreading disease throughout society? The answer is the vaccinated.

“Self-spreading vaccines – also known as transmissible or self-propagating vaccines – are genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection,” the JHU paper explains.

“The vision is that a small number of individuals in the target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus. These vaccines could dramatically increase vaccine coverage in human or animal populations without requiring each individual to be inoculated.”

READ MORE

https://dreddymd.com/2021/05/08/johns-hopkins-university-confirms-that-self-spreading-vaccines-are-real/

Photo: unsplash.com

Corona virus, News, NZ Government, Vaccines

NZ experiencing increased coercion to take the jab

2 Comments

I say increased coercion because the Government has switched tack and gone from ‘the vx will not be made mandatory‘ to more recently (30 April to be precise) ‘mandatory for border workers’. Is this the thin end of the wedge? Who else will be required to take an experimental treatment that has only been approved for a selected number of people (see Sue Grey & the KTI’s challenge to govt on that point). And all of this aside from just plain public coercion to ‘do the right thing’ with no apparent knowledge of the risks vs benefits. Informed choice is all that is required by intelligent thinking people. We have been told however that the government is our one, sole source of reliable information. Really? There are people now, post vx who wish they had checked. Like these previously healthy, active health care workers, three women recently interviewed at Highwire. (Aside from being abandoned by the profession they served, they can no longer drive an automobile, work or function normally, among many other things).

Note also NZ has had 6 deaths within 48 hrs of taking the vx, that we know of, and not everybody is reporting. One percent is the recognized percentage. For deaths & injuries globally post-vx I recommend you visit healthimpactnews.com and thecovidblog.com The first site provides ongoing tallies from the official VAERS websites (which incidentally FB fact checkers call fake news… go figure).

I heard this week from a NZ port worker, quote:

“I have been watching my co-workers who have been jabbed. They are not ‘right’ afterwards – a lot of sick leave being taken, a few reporting numbness in the arm they got jabbed in (numbness lasting for 2 weeks), heart/chest pains, cognitive problems.
Basically I’m seeing all of the side affects that your articles have
been reporting; on a day to day basis.”

In addition I personally (ewr) have heard from another New Zealander, a port worker (mentioned before) who around a month ago was dismissed for declining the vx.

If you’ve been coerced to take the vx when you are unsure or have already decided not to… do let us know. I can post your experience here anonymously.

Here is an excellent video on topic from the Curious Kiwi YT channel… The Progression of Mandating C-19 Vaccine in New Zealand

EWR

Corona virus, Military, News, Vaccines

Western Australian Govt. authorises military to administer CV Vax describing it in the paperwork as ‘poison’!

8 Comments

So the Western Australian government has given the military authorisation to administer the covid vaccine and describes it as “a poison”!!!
https://www.wa.gov.au/…/public-health-act-2016-wa…

RELATED:
https://blogfactory.co.uk/2021/04/27/tap-bombshell-found-on-official-australian-government-site-ukgovernmentwatch/

Photo: Wikipedia: By U.S. Army photo by Spc. William Marlow – https://www.dvidshub.net/image/2276387/urban-operations-training-camp-taji-iraq#.Vkpmg3YrKUk, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=45047757

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths

More deaths following the experimental injection

Leave a comment

All recorded at thecovidblog.com I recommend you sign up & get updates to your inbox…

Lucy Taberer: 47-year-old British woman suffers blood clots, dead 22 days after experimental AstraZeneca shot

Kimberly Credit: 44-year-old New Jersey pastor dead 26 days after second Moderna mRNA shot

Sharon Beaudry: 67-year-old North Carolina woman dead 24 hours after first Pfizer mRNA shot

Bernice Gibb Rhoades: 56-year-old niece of Bee Gees brothers dead days after second Pfizer mRNA shot

Photo: unsplash.com

Corona virus, Employment, legal, News, Vaccines

Are you under PRESSURE to have the Covid 19 vaccine? (practical Help from NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey)

3 Comments

via The Health Forum NZ FB page

Are you under PRESSURE to have the Covid 19 vaccine?
If you wish to decline it, here are some helpful suggestions from lawyer Sue Grey…Quote…

“I’m getting lots of questions from employees and students who are being pressured to receive the experimental Pfizer vax.
My suggestion is to write to your boss or course supervisor to ask for more information. You can use this as an opportunity to educate.

Here is an example which you are free to use or modify:

Dear _____
I am keen to get as much information as possible before I make an informed decision on whether or not I receive the Covid vaccine.

1 Please could you confirm why the Cominarty Vaccine has only provisional consent in New Zealand and who are the limited number of patients it has been authorised for?

2 What is the status of the 58 outstanding questions Medsafe asked Pfizer about the safety, effectiveness and quality of production? https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/…/status-of-applications.asp

3 Please can you help me understand why this Vaccine is being used on the public before the 58 conditions have been addressed.

4 Please can you help me understand which of the risks identified in this report to Medsafe have been answered, and which are still outstanding. Please can you give me any research you are aware of to show that this Vaccine is Safe for pregnant women and does not trigger miscarriages, and which medications it has been tested with. https://medsafe.govt.nz/…/MinutesOoS-20-jan-2021.htm

5 I have read research that indicates that many of the Covid vaccines and the SProtein in these vaccines affects human blood clotting. Please can you provide research to show that SProtein manufactured by the Pfizer Vaccine will not cause any changes to recipients blood https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.21.423721v1

6 I understand that the Pfizer Vaccine does not prevent infection or transmission. Please can you explain why therefore it is not a decision for each individual as to whether they wish to receive it or not, depending on their own health, genetics and ethical beliefs.

7 Please can you explain the consequences for my employment/training if I choose to not have the experimental Pfizer Vaccine at this time, and who will decide this.

I really appreciate your help with this.

Thanks

Student’s name

Photo Credit: The Health Forum NZ FB page

Corona virus, Vaccines

Meanwhile across the ditch NSW has an 80% no show for the CV injection

1 Comment

From The Health Forum NZ FB page

Across the ditch…Health workers are not turning up for their CV V in droves…up to 80% of all appointments cancelled or no show. In May, Sydney will open a mega hub for vaccination…. 5,000 administrations per day.

“NSW sees rise in vaccination cancellations for frontline healthcare workersNew South Wales has seen a 70 to 80 per cent increase in ‘no shows’ and appointment cancellations from frontline healthcare workers following the announcement regarding the safety of the AstraZeneca vaccine for certain age groups.”

VIDEO: https://www.facebook.com/SkyNewsAustralia/videos/475774227098799

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction

The document google pulled – download while you can

Leave a comment

Intended for you to peruse & assist you in making an informed decision yourself. See this post for background info.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uS4krGJX-7sa8fuRlH7mhod-Xa5ZBsXU/view?fbclid=IwAR1jpezlhQ07Ph3p5SioFP9AxYLZpPLq6sK0hn038w77ttWZlxGixyrkAjE

CDC, Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction

3,486 DEATHS in the U.S. Following COVID Injections in 4 Months: More Vaccine Deaths Recorded Than the Past 15 Years COMBINED

1 Comment
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/mass-murder-3486-deaths-in-the-u-s-following-covid-injections-in-4-months-more-vaccine-deaths-recorded-than-the-past-15-years-combined/

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The CDC announced this week that deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines, following experimental COVID injections, have now reached 3,486 deaths since December of 2020, when the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID shots were given emergency use authorization (EUA) by the FDA.

To get a perspective on the magnitude of deaths following COVID shots that are being reported to the CDC, there were only 3,445 deaths reported to the CDC following all vaccines from 1/1/2005 through 11/30/2020, the 15-year period prior to the FDA issuing emergency use authorizations for experimental COVID injections in December of 2020.

READ MORE AT THE LINK BELOW THE IMAGE

Photo: injection image, thanks to pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, Ministry of Health NZ, News, NZ Government, Vaccines

If your employer is claiming the vax is safe you might like to ask about risks identified by Medsafe

Leave a comment

From Sue Grey, NZ Lawyer, LLB(Hons), BSc (Biochemistry & Microbiology), RSHDipPHI (at Facebook)

If your employer is claiming the VAX is safe you might like to ask about risks identified by Medsafe in this report by the Medicines Adverse Reactions Committee. These serious issues were identified and discussed 20 Jan 2021. Bizarre these minutes were not published until 13April 2021. You can now get the report from Medsafe’s website.

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction

Just do the math: COVID-19 “vaccines” are killing people

1 Comment

From Mark Crispin Miller

Starting with Gibraltar, whose startling numbers were observed, in
early February, by Keith Rushworth, who lives there, and whose analysis I sent out on March 7, Gilad Atzmon’s essay demonstrates conclusively that those COVID-19 “vaccines” are killing people. 

My prior email re: Gibraltar (among other evidence) is at this link. Keith’s piece is attached, in case you didn’t read it then. 
https://markcrispinmiller.com/2021/03/the-true-toll-of-those-mrna-vaccines-is-vastly-higher-than-our-free-press-has-been-telling-us-must-read-especially-about-gibraltar/

It is a challenge to stay calm amid this ongoing slo-mo global massacre, but that’s what we must do, to spread the word, while it’s still possible. Those who jeer and/or defame us for it are “good Germans,” who either know not what they do, or are paid agents.

MCM

From David Diamond

Gilad Atzmon is a saxophonist who can read WHO statistics
and operate the graphing function in Powerpoint. Apparentlythe last two abilities are unique.  

Atzmon charts the dramatic rise in cases and fatalities which
immediately follow the introductionof the vaccine in country
after country.  Should anyone betroubled to explain this, the
most plausible theory would be thatthe national variants—
“Brazilian,” “British,” “South African”—could be more accuratelylabeled “vaccine-induced.”  Curiously the three national variantshave all appeared in countries which hosted vaccine trials, and seem to have the ability to travel to places closed to internationalarrivals.

The Gibraltar Massacre
GILAD ATZMON • APRIL 17, 2021
 • 1,700 WORDS 

https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/the-gibraltar-massacre/

Gibraltar currently has the world’s worst Covid-19 death rate per capita (2791 per million at time of publication). The disaster started on December 12, when an unprecedented surge in cases was witnessed (see graph below). Until that point in time, like in other European countries, Covid cases had been in constant decline for a while. In Gibraltar, numbers of cases had been dropping for almost a month since November 13. 

What people do not know is that just a few days before Gibraltar morphed into a Covid killing zone, 273 Spanish key healthcare workers involved with Gibraltar’s elderly and vulnerable populations were reportedly inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine.

Gibraltar Bay radio reported on 7 December 2020, that “More than 9,200 Spanish nationals cross the Gibraltar border to work. Vaccination plans are still being drawn up, but around 273 workers working in care agencies looking after the elderly could become the first Spanish nationals to receive the Pfizer vaccine.“

The Spanish El Pais quotes Antonio Sánchez, a Spanish national and carer for two children with autism at a youth care centre who knew that he would be the amongst the first to receive the vaccine. “I am one of the first. The subcontractor company that I work for has told us that it’s very likely that they will begin vaccinating us next week [the week starting December 7].”

On 8 December elperiodico.com announced that “the Spanish workers in the health and care sector in Gibraltar will be the first in the country to be vaccinated from Tuesday (8 December) against coronavirus, under the Gibraltar Government vaccination program.”

Until now we have looked at Israel as the ultimate testing ground for the Pfizer experiment. As I have been reporting since the beginning of January, the outcome of the Israel/Pfizer experiment has been pretty devastating. Israel’s Covid deaths doubled in just 2 months of vaccinations. Cases of newborn Covid grew by 1600%, hospitalisations doubled and so on.


Click on the link for the rest.

https://markcrispinmiller.com/2021/04/re-important-post/

Image by Gábor Bejó from Pixabay

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, Science, Vaccines

If your employer says this is “just like a flu vaccination”

2 Comments

From The Health Forum NZ Facebook page

Read this well and ponder these words of warning from a German Doctor and Biochemist, Dr. Jochen Ziegler.

Do not let anyone tell you (as employers currently are, here in NZ) that this is “just like a flu vaccination”. He is referring to a case of thrombocytopenia (destruction of blood platelets causing fatal bleeding) after the Covid mRNA vaccine, in a 56 year old doctor.

Quote…”If this is confirmed, it follows that the side effect of vaccination with BNT162b may be acute thrombocytopenia. Since more than a million people have been vaccinated worldwide, that would be a very rare side effect.

If the vaccine were effective in preventing the severe COVID illness and preventing death, such a rare side effect could still be accepted. But such an effect has not been shown (and it is also unlikely ), nor has it been shown to have any effect on the distribution of evolutionary offspring of SARS-CoV-2, which genetically no longer exists, through infection.

So far, NO STUDY HAS BEEN ABLE TO SHOW THAT VACCINATION REDUCES INFECTION RATES. That would only be possible with high vaccination coverage. It cannot be ruled out either, but it is also possible that the virus has long since mutated to such an extent that if a large number of people are vaccinated, it cannot develop this effect.

Much more important is that we DO NOT KNOW THE CHRONIC EFFECTS OF BNT162b ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM and DO NOT KNOW WHETHER IT CAN LEAD TO AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE such as Guillain-Barré syndrome or lupus erythematosus. THIS IS BECAUSE THE VACCINE HAS NOT BEEN TESTED FOR CHRONIC TOXICITY BEFORE APPROVAL.

These effects can be observed in spring or early summer 2021 at the earliest, when the vaccinees in the first studies have already been vaccinated for nine months to a year. Then you have to wait another year to really know the chronic effects.

That is how long one should have waited with the approval of the vaccine, BECAUSE CURRENTLY ONE VACCINATES WITHOUT KNOWING WHETHER THE SUBSTANCE PROTECTS OLD PEOPLE FROM DEATH BY COVID AND WITHOUT KNOWING THE DANGERS OF THE VACCINE. USUALLY YOU ONLY VACCINATE AFTER CAREFULLY WEIGHING THE BENEFITS AND RISKS. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN WITH THE PFIZER VACCINE.

The G. Michael case tragically suggests what that might mean. He was not at risk from COVID due to his age and health, and we do not know whether the vaccination would have protected others from infection by him. Now he is vaccinated and dead. Further developments will have to be observed very carefully.https://www.achgut.com/…/impfungen_wie_risiken_sichtbar…

Photo: pixabay.com

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction, News

As many as 246 Michigan residents considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19 were later diagnosed with the virus & three have died

Leave a comment

The cases were reported between Jan. 1 and March 31, and the 246 had a positive test 14 or more days after the last dose in the vaccine series, said Lynn Sutfin, a spokeswoman for the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, in an email.

“Some of these individuals may ultimately be excluded from this list due to continuing to test positive from a recent infection prior to being fully vaccinated,” she said.

READ MORE

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2021/04/05/246-vaccinated-residents-diagnosed-covid-3-dead-michigan/7100759002/?fbclid=IwAR05kY5Mp_gTK83bUdh7g1mDqpsKmbjpx3exgJ4mfGVqQF5ST8RlGUludIM

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction

CDC Reports 2,794 Total Deaths Following COVID Experimental “Vaccines” as Some Clinics Halt J&J Shots due to Side Effects

1 Comment

Note the censorship, Facebook classifies this as fake news, and it’s straight from the CDC/VAERS website.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-reports-2794-total-deaths-following-covid-experimental-vaccines-as-some-clinics-halt-jj-shots-due-to-side-effects/
Corona virus, Covid Vaccine Deaths, Covid Vaccine reaction

CDC: 2,249 DEAD 50,861 Injured .. Experimental COVID-19 Injection

Leave a comment

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-2509-deaths-following-experimental-covid-19-vaccines-now-equal-to-total-deaths-recorded-after-vaccines-for-the-past-decade/

Corona virus, Covid Vaccine reaction, News, Vaccines

Hear Dr Mike Yeadon’s concerns about the CV jab- (former CSO of Pfizer)

Leave a comment

Dr Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd, talks about his grave concerns about the Coronavirus jab. Listen to him interview with James Delingpole. A good follow up is a commentary by David Icke. He provides & speaks to a transcript of Dr Yeadon’s interview, calling out the MDs & other health professionals complicit in this. He also speaks to our need to resist.

https://rumble.com/vf8fz5-dr-mike-yeadon.html?fbclid=IwAR1dRcn2FiySF4b_PfNLDHyBbsSY53xFxVFHFoDLq61OgLkkWt2m85WNPL0

David Icke:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/AmMgIvqtjByE/