Nothing to See Here: Ottawa LOCKS Vaccine Injury Records Away for 15 Years
SHOCKING: Canadian Doctors Just KILLED A DISABLED MAN Via MAID for Being LONELY and Isolated!
Continue reading Other Recent HeadlinesTag Archives: HPV
An inconvenient study: Shocking disparities found between vaccinated & unvaccinated children’s health outcomes (surprised ?)
” … vaccinated children showed 4.29 times higher rates of asthma, nearly six times higher rates of autoimmune disease, and 5.5 times higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. Most remarkably, among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD compared to 262 cases in the vaccinated group. “
A documentary review from Unbekoming @ substack
“An Inconvenient Study” delivers a gripping piece of investigative journalism that will leave viewers questioning everything they thought they knew about vaccine safety research. When medical journalist Del Bigtree challenged Dr. Marcus Zervos of the prestigious Henry Ford Health System to conduct the most comprehensive vaccinated versus unvaccinated study ever undertaken, neither anticipated the explosive journey that would follow. The documentary’s hidden camera revelation—capturing Dr. Zervos admitting that publishing his completed study would end his career—provides one of the most stunning moments in recent documentary filmmaking. With over 18,000 subjects studied and shocking disparities found between vaccinated and unvaccinated children’s health outcomes, this film exposes what appears to be a deliberate suppression of critical public health data that every parent deserves to see.
Del Bigtree brings unique credibility to this investigation, having evolved from CBS medical journalist to becoming one of the most persistent voices demanding transparency in vaccine safety science. Through his nonprofit ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network), he’s successfully sued government agencies and uncovered the startling absence of proper placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines—victories that provide crucial context for understanding why the Henry Ford study matters so profoundly. The documentary skillfully weaves Bigtree’s personal journey with the larger narrative, showing how his production of the original “Vaxxed” documentary opened his eyes to thousands of parents reporting similar patterns of vaccine injury. His encounter with Colton, a 13-year-old paralyzed by the HPV vaccine who tragically took his own life in 2018, provides emotional weight that grounds the statistical arguments in human reality.
The relationship between Bigtree and Dr. Zervos forms the documentary’s compelling core, with Zervos emerging as a complex figure caught between scientific integrity and institutional pressure. His credentials—having solved the Flint water crisis and conducted controversial hydroxychloroquine research—establish him as someone willing to challenge orthodoxy when lives are at stake. The film’s presentation of the study’s findings is staggering: vaccinated children showed 4.29 times higher rates of asthma, nearly six times higher rates of autoimmune disease, and 5.5 times higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. Most remarkably, among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD compared to 262 cases in the vaccinated group. When Zervos admits on hidden camera that he would publish the study “just how it is” if not for the current climate, calling the findings “important” while simultaneously refusing to publish out of career preservation fears, the documentary captures a scientist’s moral crisis in real-time.
The film’s methodological approach demonstrates sophisticated understanding of epidemiological research while remaining accessible to general audiences. Rather than simply dismissing potential criticisms, the documentary shows how the Henry Ford team conducted multiple sensitivity analyses, adjusting for follow-up time, healthcare-seeking behavior, and various confounders—yet the alarming disparities persisted. The visual presentation of data, particularly the graph showing that by age 10 only 43% of vaccinated children remained free from chronic health conditions compared to 83% of unvaccinated children, makes complex statistics immediately comprehensible. The film strengthens its case by contextualizing the Henry Ford study within other independent research, including Dr. Peter Aaby’s shocking findings from Guinea-Bissau where DTP-vaccinated children had five times higher mortality rates despite being protected from the target diseases.
The documentary’s investigative techniques create undeniable dramatic tension while raising important questions about scientific transparency. The decision to use hidden cameras, while controversial, proves justified when Zervos’s candid admissions reveal the gulf between private acknowledgment and public silence. The film effectively contrasts heart-wrenching parent testimonials—particularly the devastating account of triplets who simultaneously regressed after vaccination—with the cold institutional responses that dismiss their experiences. Attorney Aaron Siri’s deposition of vaccine luminary Dr. Stanley Plotkin provides another documentary highlight, with Plotkin admitting under oath that five-day safety trials cannot detect autoimmune or neurological conditions that develop after that window, essentially acknowledging that vaccine safety science rests on assumptions rather than data.
From a cinematographic perspective, “An Inconvenient Study” excels at building narrative tension through careful pacing and strategic reveals. The filmmakers wisely hold back the actual study results until after establishing the credibility of both Bigtree and Zervos, making the eventual revelations land with maximum impact. The hidden camera footage, while grainy, carries the authentic tension of genuine investigative journalism—this isn’t polished propaganda but raw documentation of a scientist’s confession. The film’s emotional range, from parents’ anguished testimonials to Bigtree’s visible frustration when Zervos refuses to publish, creates a human dimension that prevents the documentary from becoming merely a data presentation. The inclusion of the cease-and-desist letter from Henry Ford Health’s attorneys in the film’s conclusion adds a layer of institutional intimidation that reinforces the documentary’s central thesis about suppression.
“An Inconvenient Study” stands as essential viewing for anyone concerned about children’s health, scientific integrity, or institutional transparency. The documentary’s power lies not in telling viewers what to think but in exposing information that has been deliberately withheld, allowing audiences to draw their own conclusions. When Dr. Zervos states that “nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job,” he inadvertently explains why this study remained hidden and why Bigtree felt compelled to expose it through unconventional means. The film’s call for other institutions to replicate this research feels less like activism and more like basic scientific principle—if the Henry Ford study is flawed, prove it through replication, not suppression. For parents making health decisions for their children, medical professionals questioning orthodox positions, and citizens concerned about institutional capture of science, this documentary provides crucial information that has been systematically kept from public view. Its ultimate message—that parents deserve access to all safety data before making medical decisions for their children—should resonate regardless of one’s position on vaccines, making “An Inconvenient Study” one of the most important documentaries of our time.
WATCH NOW | An Inconvenient Study
Image by Triggermouse from Pixabay
Another medical doctor shares vital info on the covid operation
What do we know?
We know that the tests do not work but governments pretend that they do. We also know that some vaccines sterilize people. Warp Speed vaccine preparation almost guarantees vaccine injury, plus it is an entirely new DNA altering vaccine. Big Pharma is not liable for injuries. Nano-tech is also part of the equation with Immunity Passports etc. — Mark Taliano
” Dr Petrella is a retired gynaecologist from Teramo in Italy who has already garnered controversy over his Covid 19 views. Petrella was expelled from the Order of Doctors after retirement for his views surrounding the HPV vaccine which he considers to be ineffective and in some cases dangerous. Petrella upheld his right to his opinion and stated that he is against any kind of mandatory vaccine. Petrella is appealing against the decision.https://www.ilcentro.it/…/teramo-arriva-la-radiazione-per-i…
READ MORE
LINK: https://www.marktaliano.net/dr-petrella-and-the-dangers-of-the-covid-operation/
Note to NZers: the HPV vaccine has already killed three NZ young people.
Before you say yes to the Gardasil HPV vaccine parents, please watch this video
66.5K subscribers
Vaccinated vs unvaccinated – official unpublished data from CDC obtained via FOIA – an absolute MUST READ!
Here is the data from CDC’s own information. The data they didn’t see fit to share with you strangely. Or should that be not so strangely?
This is very concerning information. And now you parents who are being pressured against exercising your own right of choice regarding medical procedures … you have a list of data you can produce to illustrate your decision, whatever that may be.
Please download this pdf file & read the full version for yourself. I have simply copied the headings with the information. You can see the graphs in the pdf & additional information. (Note I have highlighted some of the information fyi). EWR
- CDC’s unpublished Verstraeten study on Hep B showed dramatic increased risk of Autism(7.6X), Sleep Disorders (5X), Speech Disorders (2.1X), and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1.8X)
- DTP increases mortality in girls TEN TIMES!
- Flu shot increases rate of Non-Flu infection 4.4 times!
- Hep B vaccines in male newborns increases odds of Autism THREE TIMES!
- DTP & Tetanus vaccinations increase the odds of allergies (1.63x) in children
- Vaccination of Preemies increased odds of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 6.6X!
- Vaccination increases risk of Allergic Rhinitis (30X), Allergy (3.1X), ADHD (4.2X), Autism (4.2X), Eczema (2.9X), Learning Disability (5.2X), and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3.7X).
- Vaccination increases Type 1 Diabetes 3X
- Polio Vaccination increases Type 1 Diabetes 2.5X
- Raw CDC data shows Vaccination on time with MMR increased odds of Autism 3.64X
- Thimerosal-containing Hepatitus B Series increases odds of Autism 3.39X
- Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine increases the odds of Asthma 8.01X
- Thimerosal-containing Hepatitus B Series increases odds of Premature Puberty 2.1X
- MMR Vaccine increases risk of Crohn’s Disease 3.01X & Ulcerative Colitis 2.53X
- Thimerosal-containing Hepatitus B Vaccines – when compared to children vaccinated without Thimerosal – increased odds of ADHD 1.98X
- Highest levels of Thimerosal exposure increased Autism risk 11.35X
- Two H1N1-containing Influenza Vaccines prior to and during pregnancy increases miscarriage odds by 7.7X!!
- H1N1 Influenza vaccine increases risk of Bell’s Palsy (1.34X), Paraesthesia (1.25X), & Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1.25X) in high risk patients
- HPV vaccination increases odds of Memory Impairment (1.23X) & Involuntary Movement (1.53X)
- Thimerosal-containing Triple Hepatitus B series in the first six months of life increases odds of emotional disturbances 2.37X
- HPV vaccine increases risk of Celiac Disease by 1.56X
- The H1N1 and seasonal Influenza Vaccines both given during pregnancy increase fetal loss by 11.4X compared to the seasonal Influenza vaccine only
- Swine Flu vaccine (Pandemrix) increases rate of Narcolepsy in Swedish children by 25X
- Risk of Chorioamnionitis in pregnant women vaccinated with Tdap versus pregnant women not vaccinated with Tdap increases 1.19X
- First dose of Rotavirus Vaccine (Rotarix) increases Intussusception odds by 5.8X
- Measles vaccination versus Measles infection increases the odds of Atopy by 2.8X
- Higher exposure to Thimerosal from infant vaccines increases the odds of Motor Tics (2.19X) & Phonic Tics 2.44X) in boys
- Delaying the first three DPT vaccine doses reduces Asthma risk by 61%
- Exposure to higher levels of Thimerosal in infant vaccines before 13 months of ages increases the rate of Premature Puberty by 6.45X
- Addition of the Hepatitus B Vaccine in 1988 increased the rate of Type 1 Diabetes 1.62X in children in NZ
- DTP Vaccination increases mortality by 2.45X in girls previously receiving the BCG (Tuberculosis) vaccine
- Higher number of vaccine doses prior to One year of age increases Infant Mortality by 1.83X
- One dose of the DTP vaccine increases infant mortality by 1.84X
- Early DTP vaccination in girls increased Infant Mortality by 5.68X
- Receipt of both the BCG and DTP vaccines increased infant mortality in girls by 2.4X
- Receipt of the second and third dose of the DTP vaccine increases Infant Mortality by 4.36X
- Vaccination increases the risk of Asthma (11.4X) and Hay Fever (10X) in children with no family history of those disorders
- Vaccination with DTP simultaneously with measles vaccine or DTP after Measles vaccine increased risk of death (2.59X)
- Hepatitus B vaccination increases the odds (3.1X) of a Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis
70% of SIDS deaths occur within 3 weeks of DPT vaccination
https://dagmarpalmerova.com/2019/11/09/vaxxed-unvaxxed-full-presentation/
A neurologist says he is “100% sure” that the HPV vaccination caused the death of this 14 year old boy
How very sad. Deep condolences to this family. Rest in peace Christopher.
Please folk, read the contents of this website dedicated to Christopher before you submit yourself or a loved one to this vaccine. In particular read the page about the vaccine.
And note, NZ has lost three young women to this vaccine.
From christopherbunch.org
On June 29, 2018, Christopher Bunch received the Gardasil vaccine at a routine doctor’s visit.
Within two and half weeks, he started complaining of a sore throat, and by July 31, he was complaining about a terrible sore throat and headache. (Sore throats and headaches are listed on the Gardasil 9 vaccine insert at common adverse effects.)
On August 1, his mother, Destiny, took him to express care where he tested negative for strep throat. He was sent home with instructions to treat the symptoms.
The week of August 6, Christopher started football practice. After practice, he showered and slept until the following afternoon when it was time for practice again. Thinking that Christopher was dehydrated from practice and the heat, he was encouraged to eat and drink. After dinner, he went back to sleep.
On August 8, after several attempts to wake Christopher, his mother decided he needed to see a doctor and headed to Trinity Medical Center. On the way to the hospital, Christopher was disoriented and said he felt very confused.
READ MORE
Vaccination Without Parental Knowledge Kills 14-year-old-girl
June 2, 2019 — Canada already has a law allowing children to be vaccinated without parental knowledge or consent, and that law has killed at least one young healthy girl. Her name was Annabel Morin. She was vaccinated in school and 16 days later had a severe adverse reaction but no one connected it to the vaccination. Her mother had no clue her daughter had been recently vaccinated. After she recovered and returned to school – despite the fact that Annabel told her school about her emergency room visit – the school vaccinated her again failing to connect the adverse reaction to the dangerous Gardasil vaccine. She died 15 days after her second dose of Gardasil. Her mother Linda had no knowledge when the vaccinations were given, which is perfectly legal in Canada. Read more about this at the following links:
http://www.offtheradar.co.nz/index.php/vaccines/201-gardasil-and-linda-morin-fighting-the-silence
ttps://sanevax.org/gone-after-gardasil-annabelle-canada/
READ MORE
Studies indicate countries with high HPV vaccination coverage show increased incidence of invasive cervical cancer
Paradoxical Effect of Anti-HPV Vaccine Gardasil on Cervical Cancer Rate
Posted on:
Wednesday, February 6th 2019 at 12:30 pm
Written By:
Originally published on www.docteur.nicoledelepine.fr
“How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress”. Niels Bohr (Nobel prized for his works on the structure of the atom and chemical reactions)
Changing the natural history of cancer that increases in frequency and occurs faster.
It takes a long time to affirm that a preventive action really protects. But the failure of this supposed protection can sometimes be very quickly obvious. To prove that the Titanic was truly unsinkable would have required decades of navigation on the most dangerous seas of the world. Demonstrating that it wasn’t, took only a few hours … This » Titanic » demonstration is unfortunately reproduced by the Gardasil vaccination.
Evidence that vaccination increases the risk of invasive cancer can be rapid, if the vaccine changes the natural history of cancer by accelerating it. The analysis of trends in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer published in official statistics (registers) was studied in the first and most fully vaccinated countries (Australia, Great Britain, Sweden and Norway). Unfortunately, it’s the case for HPV vaccines.
Pre-vaccination period: spectacular success of cervical smear screening with a steady decrease in the rate of invasive cervical cancer.
In all countries that performed smear screening, the pre-vaccination period from 1989 to 2007 was marked by a significant decrease in the standardized incidence of cervical cancer.
In less than 20 years, the incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix decreased from:
- 13.5 to 9.4 in Great Britain [1]
- 13.5 to 7 in Australia [2]
- 11.6 to 10.2 in Sweden [3]
- 15.1 to 11 in Norway [4]
- 10.7 to 6.67 in the USA [5]
- 11 to 7.1 in France
Globally, in the countries that used smear screening, the average annual rate of decline was 2.5% between 1989 and 2000 and 1% between 2000 and 2007, resulting in a total decrease of nearly 30% across 1989-2007.
Era of vaccination: reversal of the trend. Gardasil’s prevention failure erases the beneficial effects of the smear and accelerates the onset of cervical cancer.
Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups. Let’s look at OFFICIAL sources.
AUSTRALIA: contrary to the FAKE NEWS OF THE MEDIA AND POLITICS, REGISTER DOES NOT SHOW CANCERS OF THE CERVIX DISAPPEAR, BUT INCREASE.
Australia was the first country to organize routine immunization for girls (April 2007 school-based program for females aged 12–13 years, July 2007 time-limited catch-up program targeting females aged 14–26 years) and then for boys (2013). According to the last Australian Institute of Health and Welfare publication (2018 publication describing the detailed rates until 2014) [6], the standardized incidence in the overall population has not decreased since vaccination 7/100000 in 2007 versus 7.4 in 2014.
This global stabilization results from two contradictory trends that only appear by examining trends, according to age groups.
Vaccinated age groups women have seen their risk increase:
100% increase for those aged 15 to 19 (from 0.1 in 2007 to 0.2 in 2014)
113% increase (from 0.7 to 1.5) in groups aged 20 to 24 more than 80% of them were catch up vaccinated when 13 to 17 years old.
But, as the figures are very small, this increase does not reach statistical significance.
About a third increase for 25-29 group (from 5.9 to 8,p=0.06) and for 30-34 (from 9.9 to 12.4 c=0.80 p=0.01) less vaccinated. These increases are statistically significant cannot be due to hazard.
A drama known to one top athlete: Sarah Tait
This increased risk of cancer following vaccination was dramatically illustrated by the sad story of Sarah Tait, olympic rowing champion, at the 2012 London Olympics. This champion saw her life shattered in full glory: she suffered invasive cervical cancer a few years later, being vaccinated and died at age 33. Of course, we don’t know if vaccination was the direct cause of her cancer, but she has, statistically, a one in two chances of having suffered from a cancer linked to vaccination (to be part of the 113% increase of cancer observed after vaccination). In addition, we remark that cancer appears very early in this woman.
Non vaccinated women continue to benefit from screening with pap smear
During the same period, older women (and therefore unvaccinated) saw their cancer risk decrease significantly:
- less 17% for women aged 55 to 59 (from 9.7 to 8.1)
- less 13% for women aged 60 to 64 ( from 10.3 to 8.9)
- less 23% for those aged 75 to 79 (from 11.5 to 8.8)
- and even less 31% for those aged 80 to 84 (from 14.5 to 10)
GREAT BRITAIN: THE PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF GARDASIL PROMOTING CANCER
In UK, a national program was introduced in 2008 to offer HPV vaccination routinely to 12–13-year-old and offer catch-up vaccination to girls up to 18 years old. The UK national program initially used the bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix), but, changed in 2012 to use the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil). HPV vaccination coverage in England has been high with over 80% of 12–13 years old receiving the full course coverage. The catch-up cohort has been lower covered (ranging from 39% to 76%).
Since the vaccination, the standardized incidence in the overall population increased from 9.4 per 100000 in 2007 to 9.6 in 2015. We observe contrasting trends between the age groups.
Vaccination promoters expected cervical cancer rates decrease in women aged 20 to 24 from 2014, as vaccinated adolescents enter their second decade. However, in 2016, national statistics showed a sharp and significant increase in the rate of cervical cancer in this age group. This information of 2016 has unfortunately not been publicized. They could have served as an alert.
Women aged between 20 and 25 years, vaccinated for more than 85% of them, when they were between 14 and 18 years old, have seen their cancer risk increase by 70% in 2 years (from 2.7 in 2012 to 4.6 per 100,000 in 2014 p = 0.0006) and those aged 25 to 30, ( aged between 18 and 23 at the time of the vaccination campaign) have seen their cancer risk increase by 100% between 2007 and 2015 [7] (from 11 / 100,000 to 22 / 100,000 ).
Women 25 to 34 years, (less vaccinated, only exposed to some catch-up vaccinations), have seen their risk increased by 18% (from 17 in 2007 to 20 in 2014).
In Great Britain, as in Australia, older, unvaccinated women have seen their risk decrease:
(-13% for women aged 65 to 79 and -10% for those over 80), most likely because continuation of smear screening.
SAME PARADOXICAL PHENOMENON OF GARDASIL IN SWEDEN: THE RATE OF CANCER INCREASES IN THE VACCINATED AGE GROUPS. ALERT!
In Sweden, Gardasil has been used since 2006. The vaccination program was rolled out in 2010, with vaccination coverage of 12-year-old girls approaching 80%. In 2012-2013, with a catch-up program, almost all girls aged 13 to 18 were vaccinated.
In this country, the standardized incidence of cervical cancer in the global population has increased steadily since vaccination from 9.6 per 100000 in 2006 to 9.7 in 2009, 10.3 in 2012 and 11.49 in 2015 [8]. This increase is mostly due to the increase in the incidence of invasive cancers among women aged 20-24 whose incidence doubled (from 1.86 in 2007 to3.72 in 2015 p<0.001) [9] and in women aged 20 to 29 the incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix increased by 19% (from 6.69 to 8.01)
In contrast, as in Australia and Great Britain, a decrease in the incidence of invasive cancer has been observed in women over 50, a group that has not been included in the vaccination program. The incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix decreased between 2007 and 2015 by 6% for women aged 50 to 59 (from 14.24 to 13.34), and 4% for those aged 60 to 69 (12.63%). at 12.04,) 17% for those aged 70 to 79 (from 15.28 to 12.66) and 12% for those over 80 (from 15.6 to 13.68).
IN NORWAY
Cancer registry shows an increase in the standardized incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix from 11.7 in 2007 to 12.2 in 2009, 13.2 in 2012 and 14. 9 2015 [10].
This increase is due -almost exclusively- to young women, which include all vaccinated, as evidenced by the sharp decline of the average age of onset of the cervix cancer from 48 years in 2002-2006 to 45 years in 2012-2016.
Between 2007 and 2015, the incidence of invasive cervical cancer increased by 8% among women aged 20 to 29 (from 7.78 to 8.47). [11]
During the same period, a decrease in the incidence of invasive cancer was observed in older women, not involved in the vaccination program: -11% for women aged 55 to 64 (15.47 to 13.7), -16% for those aged 65 to 74 (17.7 to 14.71) and -29% for those aged 75 to 85 (18.39 to 13).
IN USA
In this country, vaccination coverage is lower than in previous countries (close to 60%).
According to the Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2015 [12], the standardized incidence of invasive cervical cancer remains stable (+0.1) since vaccination.
In US, the same discrepancy is observed according to age groups, but of lesser amplitude. Women over 50, benefit a 5% decrease in their risk (from 10.37 per 100000 in 2007 to 9.87 in 2015), whereas younger women, which include vaccinated, have given their risk increase of 4% (5.24 in 2007 to 5.47 in 2015).
WITNESS COUNTRY: FRANCE
The evolution of these countries, with high immunization coverage, can be compared to the trend observed in metropolitan France, where HPV vaccination coverage is very low (around 15%). France can be considered, for this reason, as a control country. In France [13] the incidence of cervical cancer has steadily decreased from 15 in 1995 to 7.5 in 2007, 6.7 in 2012 and 6 in 2017, much lower than those of countries with high vaccine coverage.
This decrease in incidence was accompanied by a decrease in mortality from 5 in 1980 to 1.8 in 2012 and 1.7 in 2017.
It is paradoxical and very worrying that these excellent French results, with low cervix cancer rate and low related mortality, could be jeopardized by an obligation considered in the short term by our policies, for some misinformed and other big pharma links [14].
DRAMATIC AND UNEXPECTED PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF GARDASIL: THE ALERT MUST BE GIVEN TO DECISION MAKERS AND THE MEDIA.
In all countries that achieved high HPV vaccination coverage, official cancer registries show an increase in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer.
For women under 20, the crude numbers are too small to reach statistical significance, but the similar increases in all the studied countries constitutes a strong alarm signal.
For women 20-30 the incidence increases after catch up vaccination, and is highly significant (p<0.01or 0.001). In these same countries, during the same period, older women, not vaccinated, have seen their risk of cervical cancer continue to decline.
Similarly, in metropolitan France, a country with low vaccination coverage, the incidence of cervical cancer continues to decline at a rate comparable to the pre-vaccination period.
These paradoxical results plea for a rapid revision of recommendations and intensive research to explain this catastrophic issue.
For additional research on the health risks of the HPV vaccine, visit the GreenMedInfo database on the subject.
References
[1] Cancer Research UK, Cervical Cancer (C53): 1993-2015, European Age-Standardized Incidence Rates per 100,000 Population, Females, UK Accessed 08 [ 2018 ].
[2] AIHW [2]. 13. AIHW 2017. Cancer in Australia 2017. Cancer series no. 101. Cat. No. CAN 100. Canberra: AIHW.
[3] NORDCAN, Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries 3.1.2018
[4] Bo T Hansen, Suzanne Campbell, Mari Nygård Long-term incidence of HPV related cancers, and cases preventableby HPV vaccination: a registry-based study in Norway BMJ Open 2018; 8: e019005
[5] Table 5.1 Cancer of the Cervix Uteri (Invasive) Trends in SEER Incidence and US Mortality SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2012
[6] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2017 Australian Cancer Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books: cervical cancer Canberra: AIHW. <Http://www.aihw.gov.au/acim-books>.
[7] A Castanona, P Sasienia Is the recent increase in cervical cancer in women aged 20-24 years in England a cause for concern? Preventive Medicine 107 (2018) 21-28
[8] Nationellt Kvalitetsregister für Cervix cancer prevention (NKCx), http://nkcx.se/templates/_rsrapport_2017.pdf [in Swedish]
[9] Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Hansen HL, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, Kejs AMT, Khan S, Olafsdottir E, Petersen T, Schmidt LKH, Virtanen A and Storm HH: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 8.1 (28.06.2018). Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Danish Cancer Society. Available from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed it 30 / 09 / 2018.
[10] Cancer in Norway 2016
[11] Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Hansen HL, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, Kejs AMT, Khan S, Olafsdottir E, Petersen T, Schmidt LKH, Virtanen A and Storm HH: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 8.1 (28.06.2018). Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Danish Cancer Society. Available from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed is 1 / 10 / 2018
[12] SEER 9 National Center for Health Statistics, CDC
[13] Francim, HCL, Public Health France, INCa. Projections of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Metropolitan France in 2017 – Solid Tumors [Internet]. Saint-Maurice: Public health France [updated 02/01/2018; viewed on the 09/05/2018
[14] https://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/article/gardasil-alerte-risque-imminent-d-206314 Gardasil, alert, imminent risk of mandatory vaccination against HPV unnecessary, and sometimes dangerous, for girls and boys.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/paradoxical-effect-anti-hpv-vaccine-gardasil-cervical-cancer-rate?
Government committee declares HPV vaccines should never be given to teenage boys … Media pursues total BLACKOUT on the story
Wednesday, July 26, 2017 by: Tracey Watson
(Natural News) A finding by the U.K.’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), that it is not advisable to administer the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to boys, has been met with absolute outrage and a virtual media blackout. Medical professionals in that country have been so indoctrinated by pharmaceutical companies to believe that this vaccine is life-saving that, according to The Guardian, 94 percent of general practitioners and 97 percent of dentists believe that both boys and girls should receive the shot.
All British girls between the age of 12 and 13 have been offered the HPV vaccine as part of the National Health Service’s immunization program since 2008. The JCVI has been deliberating for three years about whether this program should also be extended to include boys.
While the committee is not claiming that the vaccine would be harmful to young males, its interim statement claims that boys automatically receive herd protection by virtue of the high number of girls being vaccinated. They believe that it is therefore “highly unlikely to be cost-effective” for boys to also be given the vaccine.
There has been a concerted effort by Big Pharma and the media to push this vaccine on young people around the globe. Is it really true, however, that HPV is a life-threatening virus, and that it is vitally important to be vaccinated?
It is important to understand that the human papillomavirus is actually incredibly common, and for the most part, causes few health problems. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes, “HPV is so common that nearly all sexually active people get it at some point in their lives. … In most cases, HPV goes away on its own and does not cause any health problems.”
READ MORE
NOTE: search for other articles on the HPV vaccines (also Gardasil) for more info. Three NZ girls have already died from Gardasil. It is still being promoted with little if any mention of the risks.
India tosses out Gates Foundation due to conflicts of interest with Big Pharma
Search our site for other articles featuring various little known truths about the Gates’. Bill would like to reduce the world’s population using vaccines. I thought these were supposed to save lives? If you watch the video at the link there, you can hear him speak on the topic. It’s definitely a little smoke and ‘mirrorish’, the rationale around how populations will decrease with vaccines. If you think I’m being conspiratorial, do the search as suggested & find the article telling us some of his shots were laced with ingredients that induce abortions. Nice plan Bill. I really do feel that these people who are advocating less folk on the planet (which is amply big enough for all) ought to show the way by expunging themselves first. They never do though. Like the British Royals, they pick first on the vulnerable nations like Africa.
This article is from Natural News…
(Natural News) In the U.S., many look to him as a benevolent humanitarian simply trying to save the world from communicable disease. But in India, billionaire software guru Bill Gates has basically been told to get the hell out the country now that he and his wife Melinda’s infamous foundation has been exposed as nothing more than a vaccine-pushing fraud directly tied to Big Pharma.
India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) announced recently that it is officially cutting ties with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This announcement comes after it was shown that so-called vaccine “campaigns” conducted on tens of thousands of young girls throughout India back in 2009-2010 that were meant to help protect them from cervical cancer were actually cloaked vaccine trials involving two highly controversial vaccines known to injure and kill.
The vaccines in question are Cervarix by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Gardasil by Merck & Co., both of which are marketed as protecting against the human papillomavirus (HPV), which is claimed to have a link to cervical cancer. Both vaccines come with extreme side effects, and evidence shows that GSK and Merck essentially teamed up with the Gates Foundation to take advantage of young Indian girls and use them as human guinea pigs in trials of the two vaccines.
According to independent journalists, these trials resulted in thousands of injuries and hundreds of deaths that were eventually traced back to the two vaccines. Once news of this got back to Indian authorities, an investigation was launched that landed the Gates Foundation in court for serious ethical violations.
READ MORE
Photo: Wikipedia
Learn what the Aluminum in Vaccines is doing to your Brain & who conducted the safety studies
Impact of Vaccines: Aluminum, Autoimmunity, Autism & Alzheimer’s
By Dr. Gary G. Kohls
“I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine…has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. – Dr. Bernard Dalbergue a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer Merck, emphasis added.
“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable…for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death.” – President Ronald Reagan, as he signed The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986,absolving drug companies from all medico-legal liability when vaccines kill or disable children
“The 271 vaccines in development span a wide array of diseases, and employ exciting new scientific strategies and technologies. These potential vaccines – all in human clinical trials or under review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – include 137 for infectious diseases, 99 for cancer, 15 for allergies and 10 for neurological disorders.” – “Statement from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) – the pharmaceutical industry’s trade association and lobbying group.
The #1 talking point of Big Pharma, Big Vaccine, the CDC, the AMA and the American Academy of Pediatrics when they try to justify the use of the neurotoxin aluminum (and mercury) in their vaccines is this one:
“humans shouldn’t be afraid of the small amount of either aluminum or mercury that is or has been in many human and animal vaccines.”
They say, truthfully, that aluminum is the third most common element in the earth’s crust, behind oxygen and silicone. Oxygen makes up about 47% of the earth’s mass. Silicon is second at 28%, followed by aluminum at 8%. They also say that aluminum may be just as harmless as oxygen and silicone and that humans are also exposed to aluminum in oral antacids and underarm anti-perspirants and that those products haven’t yet been “conclusively” proven to have caused “statistically-significant” health problems. They fail, of course, to mention that the “studies” that prove aluminum’s safety (and efficacy) were designed, performed and paid-for by the very industries that benefit from the unregulated, unexamined and widespread use of injectable aluminum in America’s over-vaccination schedules. It is important to note that the reason that aluminum has been used in vaccines for the last 80+ years is because it has been found to be an “adjuvant” (defined as “a substance that enhances the body’s immune response to an antigen.” An “antigen” is “a toxin or other foreign substance that induces an immune response in the body”. Interestingly, nobody really understands exactly how aluminum performs as an adjuvant, and there is a desperate search for other adjuvants because the vaccine industry understands just how toxic it is.
READ MORE
http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/impact-of-vaccines-aluminum-autoimmunity-autism-alzheimers/
Some shocking revelations in this excellent & informative article. And no the safety studies were not independent from the manufacturing industries (aka Big Pharma). When you present for a vaccine if you’re still that way inclined, ask them to show you the safety studies. You’ll be surprized. Folks I know of who have asked, discovered the nurses attending were actually ignorant of those studies. They of course haven’t questioned their esteemed employers and just assumed they were all good. This is one issue you need to research thoroughly, particularly the vaccine-Autism link and the HPV vaccine. Check out our vaccine pages. Read the statements of the ex-industry whistle blowers, the MDs … there are many.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
The American College of Pediatricians expressed serious concerns about Gardasil in January of 2016 & it now has DOUBLE the aluminum
(NaturalHealth365) The Human Papillomavirus, or HPV, is the most common STD contracted in the United States. In addition, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that just about every sexually active person (male or female) has the virus at some point. But, what most people are NOT told is, HPV resolves on its own without causing complications or the need to ‘modify’ the immunization schedule with more toxic vaccines.
On rare occasions, HPV can lead to cervical cancer and cancers of adjacent organs. This was the motive for creating the Human Papillomavirus vaccine. The two main HPV vaccines in use are Gardasil and Cervarix – with many integrative healthcare providers warning us about the potential health risks associated with these vaccines.
New HPV vaccine promoted within the immunization schedule offers many unwanted side effects
The CDC recently released a new immunization schedule for the HPV vaccine for both adults and adolescents. New recommendations say the vaccine can be administered as young as 9 years old but with an average of 11 or 12 for the first dose.
However, the American College of Pediatricians (ACP) expressed serious concerns about Gardasil in January of 2016. The HPV vaccine has been linked with POF (premature ovarian failure, also known as premature menopause), as well as amenorrhea (absence of menstruation).
HPV vaccine side effects can be deadly
Most doctors are not aware of these potential complications, so incidents of this vaccine side effect could be even higher than reported. Gardasil also contains polysorbate 80, a compound linked with ovarian toxicity in experiments done with rats. Polysorbate 80 has also been connected with severe anaphylactic reactions, encephalitis and multiple sclerosis.
Other disturbing effects of the HPV vaccine are autoimmune conditions, permanent disability and early death in young women. And, let’s not forget, HPV vaccines contain aluminum – a known neurotoxin.
This fact is not debatable: More than 1,600 peer-reviewed published papers and scientific documents have confirmed the hazards of aluminum toxicity.
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/immunization-schedule-2217.html
See our Vaccine pages for more info & links, search categories for further Vaccine articles or use the search box, especially for the many stories that have emerged on Gardasil. Sign up here for emails or if you’re on FB follow our page for updates. Use the share buttons to expose lies & spread the truth.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
Gardasil – What TV One news did NOT tell you
This article is from 2009! So seven years on things have not improved at all in light of recent reports.
Death Rate continues to rise in both US and Europe
Last nights news on Gardasil – a Merck & Co vaccination for girls as young as 9 revealed the side affects of this vaccination for cervical cancer. The side affects they said were minor when studied seriously – sore arms, that’s to be expected the female spokesperson said. She obviously failed to do her research properly as thousands of women now suffer not from a sore arm, but from a paralysis of their arm and in some cases their legs as well.
TV One news also failed to mention the 15 deaths – in fact they never mentioned any deaths, not the 15 in America or the 2 in Europe, although they did mention the organisation that exposed the deaths focusing only side affects while omitting the deaths.
The European Medicines Agency posted a statement yesterday saying there have been two sudden and unexpected deaths in young women who had received the Merck HPV vaccine, which is marketed in Europe by Sanofi-Aventis. But the EMEA decided not to change the labeling info, given that 1.5 million women have already been vaccinated in Europe and because no causal relationship between the vaccine and the two fatalities has been found.
The spin merchants are quickly manipulating the situation. Merck has already been found guilty of killing hundreds with their Vioxx and Fosamax drugs see article here and reported side affects here
here
Will Gardasil be the third given that the company boasted that Gardasil was almost side affect free ?
Death is an inconvenient obstacle to sales – don’t be fooled, a causal relationship can be found
TV one also failed to note that Merck’s shares had dropped 8% on Wall Street
and that there are now law suits pending over the paralyzing side affects attributed to Gardasil that TV One News chose to play down
TV One News did say however, that Gardasil would not be banned here unless the US banned it first – which begs the question – is NZ not able to make its own decisions based on the precautionary principal?
An abundance of first hand evidence is now available which disputes the safely of this vaccination – in light of this should NZ not err on the side of caution given that the research on the long term affects of this drug over time has never been done?
It is recommended that this vaccination NOT be given with other vaccinations – but that was never mentioned on TV one News either.
Questions arise such as – are we witness to our politicians representing a pharmaceutical interests over the better judgment of parents who have taken the time to get behind the hype, the fear and the politics and who are now having to protect their young girls and soon, boys from a drug whose effects on reproductive health is not known
Given that this vaccination has resulted in still births and miscarriage are we willing to jeopardize young girls reproductive health in order to save them from something they may or may not get when they get older?
The risks of this Merck drug far outweighs any potential cancer risk – where are the voices protecting our young girls?
Clearly the MOH advocates are not, nor is the government acting in parents and chidlrens best interests – and lets get real here – these are the same organizations that failed to act on the thalidomide scam the continuing Dow chemical scam the cervical cancer scam of the 80’s and the birth defects caused by Agent orange and more.
READ MORE
https://www.infonews.co.nz/news.cfm?l=1&t=0&id=23815
For more info and links to docos see our Vaccine pages (remember the sub pages). Educate yourself and make informed decisions from all the data, not just what mainstream feed you. If you’re on Facebook follow us there or here at our site & keep yourself informed.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
12-year-old Girl Dies Hours After She is Injected with HPV Vaccine
The family of a 12-year-old girl from Wisconsin who died hours after receiving an HPV vaccine is grieving the loss of their daughter. Meredith Prohaska, described as being an extremely active and healthy girl, passed away on July 30th. [1]
According to a news report, Meredith’s mother took her to the doctor for a sore throat. At the doctor appointment, she received the HPV vaccine. Later in the afternoon, the mother found her daughter unresponsive on the floor, and she was later pronounced dead at the hospital. The parents suspect the vaccine as the primary cause of their daughter’s death. However, Meredith’s autopsy report rules her cause of death as inconclusive. [2]
Medical dogma is immune to “new insights,” especially when it comes from a parent on this topic, specifically. Many families also share Meredith’s story; the pain and emotional suffering is all too familiar. [3]
But despite her death, every excuse will be given to point away from the vaccine – this is called medical indoctrination – and there is a very good reason for doing so. The banal message from medical investigators, likely being to the grieving parents: “We don’t know what killed your daughter, but we know it was not the vaccine … vaccines are proven to be safe and effective. We’re terribly sorry for your loss.”
This is almost the exact message Dr. Geoffrey Swain offered, like a good little parrot, in the news interview immediately following the conversation with the grieving parents. He has an important role calming parents’ fears about vaccines, and his motives to manipulate public opinion were not so obvious, but if you knew he received money from the CDC or an organization that promotes vaccines, you may have a different opinion of him. More on that later in the article.
READ MORE
http://dailyamerica.pw/12-year-old-girl-dies-hours-after-she-is-injected-with-hpv-vaccine-2/
Chief HPV Scientist Admits Vaccines Are A Deadly Scam
Dr. Diane Harper, one of the leading experts on HPV vaccines, has spoken out about the ‘deadly effects’ the vaccines have on those who take it.
Dr. Harper was responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies for Gardasil and Cervarix, which secured approval for their use on the public.
“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States.”
During a speech at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination, she decided to come clean to the public about the dangers of receiving the HPV vaccine – saying that she could no longer sleep at night.
READ MORE
http://yournewswire.com/chief-hpv-scientist-admits-vaccines-are-a-deadly-scam/
For more info and links to docos see our Vaccine pages (remember the sub pages). Educate yourself and make informed decisions from all the data, not just what mainstream feed you. Over 35 years ago (I learned this only recently) one of our local country GPs did not vaccinate his own children. That tells you something.
EnvirowatchRangitikei
NZ Vaccine Injury – Don’t ever do this to your precious child
Or, you’ll regret it for the rest of your life. Parents always do what’s best for their child based on the information at hand. Conversely, children are prohibited to make decisions for themselves …
The seven most extreme childhood allergies coincide directly with vaccine ingredients
Do you know what peanuts and vaccines have in common? Answer: Thousands of people are allergic to both. The following was documented in 2010 by VacTruth:
What peanuts have in common with vaccines is something that very few healthcare consumers and medical doctors may be aware of: Peanut oil is a hidden and non-stated ingredient in the manufacture of children’s vaccines.
(Dr Leonard Coldwell) During the first year of life children are injected with known carcinogens and neurotoxins. Then, childrendevelop strange food allergies, some so severe they can’t even be in the room when someone takes out that food, like peanuts. Let’s take a hard look at vaccines like the MMR, DTaP and HPV, and see just what these extreme allergies root themselves in, sending the body into a panic when it senses that same allergen, thinking it might be INJECTED into muscle tissue again. The immune response is overwhelming. It’s fight or flight, and anytime you inject processed emulsifiers, genetically modified bacteria, human albumin, MSG, egg protein, reduced animal hide and cartilage (gelatin), and heavy metal toxins, into your muscle tissue 50 times in less than seven years, you might stop wondering why you or your child has EXTREME ALLERGIES to the SAME EXACT ingredients used to manufacture the majority of today’s vaccines.
Peanut oil has been used in vaccines since the 1960s, and because peanut oil does not SHOW UP in the final vaccine product, the manufacturers are allowed to leave it off the package inserts. That does NOT mean that the peanut antigen is not found in the product. Dr Leonard Coldwell
How many of the following extreme allergies do you, your spouse, or your children have? It only takes one bad reaction to kill you or maim your central nervous system or brain, for life:
1. Peanuts: Vaccines are prepared in peanut oil. DON’T THINK SO? Check now. It’s “non-disclosed” but the allergen is still present…”
For further info on vaccines visit our Vaccine pages.
Internal Site Commenting is limited to members.
Disqus commenting is available to everyone.
SOURCE: