Suleika Jaouad, John Batiste’s wife, undergoes chemotherapy (on TV); soap star Christian LaBlanc “shares cancer update”; “Young tennis player collapses during press conference in frightening scene”
NBC News correspondent Antonia Hylton is sharing for the first time that she was diagnosed with a rare type of cancer, a neuroendocrine tumor.
As a journalist on the road, Hylton, 30, was used to waking up feeling out of sorts. But, about two years ago, she started having constant stomach issues.
Hylton tells TODAY.com that she recalls not being able to have a bowel movement for days, and when she finally was able to, “the pendulum swung in the other direction, almost like I couldn’t leave the bathroom.”
Knowing that Black people have the highest rate of colon cancer in the U.S. and that she has a family history of colon cancer, Hylton said, “I went to see a specialist who sent me for a colonoscopy.”
It’s finally here: record-level data showing vaccine timing and death date. There is no confusion any longer: the vaccines are unsafe and have killed, on average, around 1 person per 1,000 doses.
Executive summary
Today you will get to see the data that nobody wants you to see. FINALLY.
No State or country has ever released record-level public health data on any vaccine.
Privacy is not the reason for this; the data can be easily obfuscated (which we did on this data) so that no record entry would match that of any person, living or dead.
The reason the data is kept secret is simple: it would expose the fact that the COVID vaccines are unsafe, as well as all the vaccines that I have been able to get record-level data on.
Today, thanks to a courageous whistleblower who works at the New Zealand Ministry of Health, we have record-level information from a large population of all ages and are making it public for the first time in history.
There was a YouTube link as well, but YouTube censored it within minutes of posting, just like we knew they would.
Just as you suspected, the COVID vaccines have killed millions of people worldwide, an estimated 1 death per 1,000 doses on average in a standard population.
And now we have the data to prove it.
The MIT slide presentation
You can read my “Is it safe?” MIT presentation slides here. I highly recommend reading the slides and/or watching the livestream. I tried to make the slides self-standing, but the livestream can be helpful in explaining some of the slides.
The presentation has everything you need including the credentials to download all the data (search for “Wasabi” in the PDF version of the slide deck).
Here are the Wasabi credentials to make it easy:
Public API keys: access-key= BDBT2BD1KKIXKPWY3030 secret-key= 5GQVqz9uDsmrYjLuNW24tRPzwPuPe0TTleUdpSF3
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. Trust me, there’s more that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than Medicare).
Wasabi explorer downloads are here for PC and Mac. You can also use CyberDuck or any other S3-compatible browser. Make sure your destination folder is writable when you copy files from the server.
You can also use rclone to make a local copy of the repository on your system:
The data: All the data in the data-transparency bucket is sanitized. Any matches to actual records is completely accidental. The data was sanitized in a way that preserves the statistics. We ran the bucket analysis on the original and obfuscated data and got nearly identical results. There is no reason any health authority couldn’t do the same thing we did.
The tools: We’ll give you our time-series cohort analysis software. This is the software that you’ll never get your State epidemiologist to use. Now, armed with record-level data, you can do your own analysis. We’ve made it super easy to use. When done, paste the output file into our v4 analysis .xlsx spreadsheet and you’ll see instantly whether the vaccine is safe or not.
The analysis documents: You’ll find annotated spreadsheets as well as word documents.
The description of the data: You’ll find documents describing the dataset (size, dates, average ages in each cohort, what the authorities claim, etc.
I encourage you to explore. Everything is “legal” in that jurisdiction. So you’ll see the full times of people who died in the Maldives, for example. In other places, the names are omitted.
Introduction
I was provided the data on November 8, 2023 when it was uploaded to my Wasabi file server.
I was asked by the whistleblower to keep the data confidential until November 30 in order to give the whistleblower time to work out the logistics of how the data would be made public.
I honored my commitment and only shared it with a handful of colleagues including Norman Fenton and his associates in the UK with the whistleblower’s consent.
The data from New Zealand is not perfect; it is not a complete sample. For example, for some people, the first record in the database is Dose #3. Also, only vaccinated people are in the database.
But, by using a cohort time-series analysis, it doesn’t matter. There is no possible way that this data is consistent with a safe vaccine. I estimated that the vaccine killed, on average, about 1 person per 1,000 doses. That means an estimated 675,000 Americans were killed by the COVID vaccines.
We have confirmation of the analysis from the US Medicare data thanks to another whistleblower.
The story of the data can be found in my presentation which has a link to the Wasabi server and access credentials, as well as how to download the free Wasabi File Explorers for PC and Mac. There is a large amount of data and analysis uploaded to the servers.
The cohort time-series analysis takes about 2 hours to run on the data. We’ve included the output files so you can start from that.
Analyzing the data takes about 5 minutes using the v4 spreadsheet in the analysis directory. Anyone can do it. You just plug in numbers to vary the parameters to look at anything you want to investigate. It has 8 visualizations: 4 main graphs (one for each independent variable) and 4 below each graph showing the number of deaths so you can use that to judge the reliability of the data points in the graph above.
Be sure to read the entire presentation to understand how to interpret the data.
Papers about the data
Papers will be coming out from various authors over the coming weeks. See this article which I will update over time.
Summary of what we found
Record level vaccination-date/death data obtained from a whistleblower in the New Zealand Ministry of Health was analyzed using a standard time-series cohort analysis. The results remained consistent even after varying all four of the key independent variables (observation time window, days after shot, age, and dose number). The only way that can happen is if the COVID vaccines significantly increased mortality for those aged 60 and older, the very population that the vaccine was supposed to help. All five Bradford Hill causality criteria are satisfied. From this data, we can accurately estimate that overall, the mRNA vaccines led to the premature death of more than 1 person per 1,000 doses on average over all doses.
This estimate is supported by COVID death data from Medicare obtained from another whistleblower. The data from Medicare was stunning: the number of people who died rose monotonically for those who got shot in 2021 or 2022. My whistleblower inside HHS had never seen anything like that before. It was a perfectly straight line sloping upwards for 365 days since the dose was given. A safe vaccine would see a decline in deaths by 4% to 5% after 1 year from the shot. The COVID vaccines had a 26% mortality increase, a net difference of 30%. This makes the COVID vaccine a competitor to heart disease as the leading cause of death among the elderly (which kills 20% of people per year).
The COVID vaccines are the deadliest vaccine of all time, killing an estimated 13 million people worldwide.
The precautionary principle of medicine requires that a vaccine which results in such a large net increase in all-cause mortality should be immediately revoked worldwide unless there is a more likely explanation for this “gold-standard” data. Nobody has come forward with a better explanation that fits all the data. In fact, nobody on the other side even wants to see this data: the FDA, CDC, Moderna, and Pfizer all refused to look at it. How is that responsible? That is reprehensible.
Researchers could have discovered the harms of these vaccines years earlier if any of the world’s health authorities released comparable record-level data to that released here. It is baffling to us why the medical community who is sworn to do no harm is not insisting on seeing any record-level data before recommending the use of any vaccine to their patients. It is the record-level data that is key to understanding whether a vaccine is safe or not. This is always hidden from public view.
Hidden from view?!?!
Clinical outcomes are never improved by keeping public health data hidden from public view. Yet every health authority in the world has kept this critical record-level safety data hidden from view.
And, to our knowledge, only one authority, the UK Office of National Statistics, had supplied even the most basic time-series analysis for a limited amount of time. The UK time-series analysis confirms the monotonic increase in mortality after each shot is given. But the UK ONS got to pick the bucket sizes whereas when we do the analysis, we have buckets for every week so we can see exactly what is going on. They can’t. And the ONS stopped responding to me when I asked to see the record-level data.
Other health authorities apparently refused to analyze their own data themselves to look for any safety signals which we found in abundance just minutes after receiving the data. After we received this data and analyzed this, we reached out to a number of health authorities in the US in Florida, California, and at the CDC and FDA. They all ignored the request to examine the data I obtained or look at their own data. This is the first time in history that vaccination-death record-level data has been made available to the public. And now we know why.
In addition, FOIA requests to the California Department of Public Health showed that they never analyzed their own data. There were no documents showing that they ever looked for any safety signals. They simply trusted the CDC even though the CDC doesn’t have any vaccine record level data, so it is IMPOSSIBLE for the CDC to do the proper safety analysis.
Finally, the safety signals are limited to those 60 and over simply because there wasn’t enough data to make a firm determination for people under 60; the data was simply too noisy because we were only given 4M of the 12M records in New Zealand.
However, since the vaccine provides no benefits whatsoever for infection, hospitalization, or death, there is no reason for anyone in the world to take these vaccines. See the presentation for details.
In any sane world, the COVID vaccines would be immediately halted and inquiries should begin as to why no health authority in the world did a thorough cohort time-series analysis on the data which would have uncovered the safety signal very early in the deployment. Are they all corrupt? Or are they all incompetent? Or both?
Can Moderna survive this? Why would anyone buy their stock?
These results have implications for Moderna stock as the failure of their underlying technology casts serious doubt on their viability as a going concern. Even if governments continue to buy their products, the breach of the public trust and the unwillingness of the company to look at the record-level data shows that the company is more interested in making a profit than ensuring the safety of their customers. A head in the sand approach to safety is despicable.
Pfizer is no different. Both companies were offered an opportunity to view this safety data and they all refused. So did the FDA and CDC. The offer was made by a respected journalist in the medical new community, not by me.
What did Professor Norman Fenton say about this new data?
Nobody should take my word on this. Those are my opinions based on examination of the data.
Anyone can analyze this data. Come to your own conclusions.
Finally, here is what famed British Mathematician Professor Norman Fenton said, “This confirms what we also saw in the most recent ONS data once.
Whatever uncertainty there may be in the younger age groups there is now no doubt the vaccine is increasing the mortality rate in older people.”
I agree. In spades. I’d bet my life on it.
Yale epidemiologist Professor Harvey Risch had this to say:
“I think that you’ve made a very strong case that the Covid genetic vaccines are associated with appreciably increased mortality rates for 6-12 months after each dose. This is particularly compelling in people over age 65. I am not aware of actual evidence that the increased post-vaccine mortality that you’ve shown has a different cause.”
The English translation of what he wrote is “the vaccines are killing people,” but scientists aren’t allowed to be blunt so they have to qualify everything they say.
This is how today’s “scientists” come to conclusions
If there was a mass shooting and everyone died, a scientist would want to have a control group and complete medical histories of each person (including a list of comorbidities) and then want to do a Cox proportional hazards analysis before concluding that the gunman could be the cause of death of these people. Without a control group, the scientist would be unable to say whether the shooting actually caused the deaths.
Nobody with respectable credentials wants to defend the vaccine as being safe
I offered to engage in a public recorded debate with anyone who thinks we got it wrong. Nobody was willing to do that to date, although Professor Jovo Vogelstein offered to give it a try to play devil’s advocate.
If you think we got it wrong, I have a $500K bet pending with Saar Wilf in Israel. I’d love to increase the stakes on that bet. Any takers?
Some people are just never going to figure this out
UPenn Professor Jeffrey Morris has had the data for a while. He doesn’t agree with our analysis (as expected). But when I asked him to explain the Medicare data where the mortality monotonically increases every day for 365 days straight, he said he refused to speculate. Professor Morris never is able to see a vaccine that is unsafe. I proposed all sorts of unsafe hypotheses to him, and he said none of them were convincing. So in his mind, no matter which way the deaths go, even if they go sky high after the vaccine is given, you cannot tell if a vaccine is safe or not; there will always be a confounder that he will find. And he’ll always insist on getting additional data that is never available, so he’ll argue that all data, no matter how strong, is not good enough.
Nearly half of America has already figured out the COVID vaccines are not safe; they want to sue the drug companies!
Some people will try to convince you that the data isn’t complete and is confounded for that reason. That’s bullshit. If it’s a safe vaccine, you can be missing 99% of the shot data and still get the right answer. Doses don’t matter; a safe vaccine is like a saline shot: they cause no impact.
They won’t get away with stupid arguments like that with me. That’s why they won’t debate me.
Consider supporting my work with a paid subscription
I only have time to do this work because this is my day job.
If you liked this article and want to keep supporting my work, and are not already a paid subscriber, please consider becoming a paid subscriber for just $50/yr or $5/month.
Your subscription fee supports the critical work that Substack has done in providing a free-speech platform, and also provides the funds needed to continue this work to expose the fraud and save lives.
Having trouble? Use the Contact me link
You can get support here using the Contact Me link.
Summary
It’s over. They’ve lost. The vaccines are unsafe. This data is the nail in the coffin. Gold standard, official records. There is no better ground truth than this.There is no comparable ground-truth data showing the vaccines are safe. Zero. There can be only one right answer.
If you think the vaccines are safe, accept my bet, debate me publicly, or release the record level data in your state. Nobody will do any of those things it seems.
Sooner or later top epidemiologists will weigh in on this data.
Now we’ll see just how broken science is if the world’s top epidemiologists cannot agree that the vaccines are unsafe. For example, will John Ioannidis weigh in? Or will he remain silent? Will Martin Kulldorff say anything? Or will he also ignore this data?
In the meantime, the medical community and mainstream media will keep recommending the jabs as if nothing has happened. They should be ashamed of themselves.
EWNZ comment: The official data doesn’t lie… and the analyst has a Masters in Science. He is speaking out. Here are just two of his comments: “The stats clearly say that something is wrong [S.I. data]. The mortality rate is far in excess of normal … not a natural event … ” “There is no chance this vaccine is not a killer …”
I found it. A single question: “If the COVID vaccine is safe, can you explain this to me?” What happens is they respond with ad hominem attacks. They cannot answer this question. Ever.
Executive summary
The one question they can’t answer has been found.
They will either change the topic or start telling you how stupid you are.
The question: “If the COVID vaccine is so safe, how do you explain Fig 1 in this article?”
Background
I want to thank Dr. Graham Bottley for inspiring this. I finally have a single simple question that every mainstream doctor will run from.
Bottley is a “scientist” whose credentials are so formidable (in his own view), that he does not have to answer any questions. I asked him two softball questions and he avoided answering them and instead requested that I answer HIS question. I said “happy to, right after you answer my question.”
“Before the recently held elections, Gunn was contacted by a whistle-blower and given documentation showing that tens of thousands of New Zealanders’ deaths are linked to the injections”
Former TV presenter Liz Gunn published a video update yesterday describing an instance of one clinic in New Zealand where 30 people received a covid injection and all 30 of them have died, within the same time frame.
Liz Gunn (Elizabeth Cooney) became internationally renowned for her support for the family in the Baby W case, where two parents objected to the use of covid-vaccinated blood in transfusions. The parents were unsuccessful in their court action to oppose health authorities seeking guardianship to allow surgery to go ahead. At the end of June 2023, Gunn launched a political party called the New Zealand Loyal Party.
Before the recently held elections, Gunn was contacted by a whistle-blower and given documentation showing that tens of thousands of New Zealanders’ deaths are linked to the injections. “This is just one of the sites recording this type of information in New Zealand,” she said. “We don’t know how many further databases like this are in the country,” she added.
She explained that because the number of deaths is usually less than the number of those suffering from ill effects of the injections, then the extrapolation of the numbers that have been injured and killed “starts to become, frankly, eye-watering.”
“…if you talk to the community in general the picture’s a lot different…. we’re speaking to communities that say there’s still hundreds missing”
We’re visiting this subject again with a recently released video at YT by The Felon Show that takes you into the flood affected area of the Esk Valley showing you close up, the complete devastation.
There is a crew of volunteers there on the ground who receive no public funding, assisting locals with the clean up. They are from the group called Man Up (all info & links in video notes).
To briefly summarize (and you can listen to the finer detail for yourself) those who have officially been accounted for as passed are those who have been identified by family and friends. However, as the presenter in the video states … “if you talk to the community in general the picture’s a lot different…. we’re speaking to communities that say there’s still hundreds missing”.
As reported in our recent article citing other eye witness testimonies, the mainstream narrative is totally at odds with this. Whose testimony do you think would be the most reliable? In the above link a helicopter pilot reported seeing hundreds in the flood waters.
House swept off its foundations and relocated: Photo credit: screenshot
We now have a ‘system’ that persecutes those who do what normal humans do … run to the rescue, without hesitation … witness the helicopter pilot now being threatened by Civil Aviation for doing so! (See here also, it’s not the first time in NZ).
Please watch this important video and share it far and wide.
They aren’t telling you because they are bought and paid for. If you would really like to know what you aren’t hearing, then listen to the following interview (link below). Also read here and here. Like me you may find it really difficult to dismiss as conspiracy. The interviewer Liz Gunn by the way, was recently arrested (and allegedly assaulted) by Police (hear about the latter here).
NOTE: See below the article for ongoing updatesfrom the East Coast & Hawke’s Bay …EWR
Even if a large part of what follows are just rumours (which I do not believe for a second) then what has happened in Hawkes Bay and the Gisborne area is a catastrophic tragedy (with possibly some elements of a crime) that goes way beyond the sanitised version of what we are being told by the mainstream media.
One thing that is not being told is the downline effects of reportedly HALF of Hawkes Bay’s rich horticulture being destroyed on top of the general assault on our food supply.…
GISBORNE & HAWKES BAY CRIPPLED We are getting reports MSM are ignoring the worst stories.
There are 5,600 registered as missing. Hawkes Bay residents are saying: “Dead animals are building up and rotting & Napier residents have been without power, hot water, internet & phone signal since Mon night/Tues morning.” “A lot of people have lost their houses, everything.” “We were totally cut off from Napier in Hastings with many people being turned away from the only crossing available even though they were essential.” “Looting, shooting, stabbing, killing, stealing, and hostage situations are going on. Gangs are out of control, holding people hostage and at gun point for their supplies.” “The devastation has all but destroyed from what we hear 50% or more of Hawkes Bay’s horticulture.”
Romanian Senator Diana Iovanovici Sosoaca went viral this week with a powerful speech calling out deep state players, highlighting that the recent Turkish earthquakes were created by weaponised technologies.
Time series analysis of New Zealand data supports a relationship between mRNA vaccination and death that is consistent with a German autopsy study.
On 14th December 2022, Medsafe (NZ Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority) released its 46th report into the safety of Covid vaccines entitled “Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines”. The report covered safety signals up to 30th November 2022.
This report contained new advice about the risk of death following mRNA vaccination. Medsafe’s assessment began as follows:
“By chance, some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly. Therefore, part of our review process includes comparing natural death rates to observed death rates following vaccination, to determine if there are any specific trends or patterns that might indicate a vaccine safety concern.”
The report comes after months of speculation concerning record levels of excess all cause mortality in New Zealand affecting all ages, currently running at 15% above historical levels.
After dropping the bombshell news, Medsafe goes through an entirely bogus and unscientific process designed to reassure the public that there is nothing to worry about. Medsafe compares the number of deaths reported to CARM (Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring) within 21 days of vaccination to the background rate of deaths from natural causes. In doing so, it omits to mention (but does so elsewhere) that CARM reports are voluntary and massively underreported by an estimated factor of 20 times. As a result there is nothing at all reassuring about this safety report.
Are There Other Reasons to Be Concerned? Yes, Many:
1. Medsafe reports, “There have been no deaths reported for the Vaxzevria or Nuvaxovid vaccines.” So why are they happening after the Pfizer vaccine?
2. Autopsies are not routinely performed in New Zealand following deaths proximate to vaccination. A recently published German study Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination reports 16% of deaths within 20 days of mRNA vaccination exhibit definitive causal symptoms of acute myocarditis, a known adverse effect of Pfizer Covid vaccination. So why is there no concerted effort here in NZ to investigate by routinely performing autopsies?
3. The Ministry of Health has consistently refused/omitted to record vaccine status on death certificates or make CARM reporting mandatory. This makes it very difficult to scientifically and reliably investigate any causal relationship between mRNA vaccination and death or serious illness. On the 17th December 2021 the director of the Covid immunisation programme wrote to me on behalf of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health, saying “An accurate measurement of all adverse events is not required”.
In the light of today’s Medsafe admission, that’s damning. Incredibly Dr. Bloomfield has just been appointed the inaugural chair of a new public policy impact institute at the University of Auckland, proposing to translate and apply research into policies that directly impact communities—but he doesn’t subscribe to accuracy??? Most people do, especially academics.
4. Medsafe argues that temporal correlation between deaths and vaccination does not prove a causal relationship between them. They, along with epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker, suggest that Covid infection or pre-existing health conditions are more likely to be causally connected to deaths following vaccination. There are in fact other relevant analyses which can determine whether there is a relationship between mRNA vaccination and proximate deaths. Among these, powerful techniques of time series analysis can discover whether deaths are consistently occurring during specific intervals of time after vaccination. This would provide strong support for a causal relationship.
Among the world’s nations, New Zealand is in a unique position to undertake this sort of analysis. In 2021 New Zealand had very few Covid infections (almost none) but the majority of the population were vaccinated over a period of eight months. Therefore deaths recorded during much of 2021 in New Zealand cannot be ascribed to any effect of Covid infection.
Preliminary data from 2021 has been analysed to investigate the proposition that mRNA vaccination resulted in deaths. This shows there is a significant (p=0.045) relationship between number of vaccines administered by week and weekly deaths at a lag of one week. In other words, there is a statistically significant increased chance of dying within a few days of vaccination. Download the study here. Despite the preliminary nature of the data in this study, the findings of this study are consistent with the findings of German autopsies. Therefore there should be more rigorous study of stored data to further test these findings
There are other simple methods to analyse death data. For example taking the date of inoculation for each individual as a notional point in time around which all death data can be assessed for entire cohorts of individuals. This would reveal whether death rates before and after inoculation differ.
5. The time series analysis does not preclude the possibility that other deaths at longer time intervals after an inoculation date may be occurring as a result of mRNA vaccination. Unprecedented rates of all cause mortality suggest this is likely to be the case. Unfortunately, the New Zealand Ministry of Health is not releasing data on causes of hospitalisation by category of illness. There is evidence we have previously reported based on US defence personal data and insurance statistics, and on UK ONS data, indicating that incidence of neurological disorders, cancers, cardiac events, and strokes have increased.
Medsafe’s position on vaccine safety has clearly shifted during the two months since it last published a safety report, but has it realised the importance of more reliable causal assessments? Apparently not. The NZ public is being kept in the dark about vaccine safety as it has been for the last two years. Bland assurances of safety continue without foundation in fact.
Can mRNA Vaccination Be a Trigger Event for Death if You Are Already Sick or Elderly?
The wording of the December 14th Medsafe warning is strange and ambiguous: “..some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly”. So are the elderly especially liable to die after vaccination because of vaccination or because they are elderly? We aren’t told.
Aside from the obviously elevated rates of excess all cause deaths, anecdotal reports from rest home staff suggest this is the case. Emergency vehicles and helicopters are answering more frequent calls. Hospitals are overwhelmed and unable to cope. Whistleblowers among nurses are talking about overflowing cardiac wards. A top UK cardiologist has suggested that the evidence of harm is overwhelming and irrefutable. Funeral home workers in New Zealand and overseas have spoken publicly about strange rubbery clots in arteries which have been confirmed by experienced pathologists in the USA. Statistically improbable increases in life insurance claims data have been noted. Sudden unexplained deaths have a high profile in the media. The message is consistent—something unprecedented and very concerning is going on.
Despite having multiple sources of data and methods of analysis available to it. Medsafe has relied for two years on a single obviously flawed method of comparing CARM data to background rates, despite admitting CARM data is underreported. How strange is that? This deficiency is fatal to Medsafe’s claims of safety. It is scientifically unjustifiable and it wouldn’t meet publication criteria.
There is no possible justification for omitting to use more reliable forms of causal investigation. Medsafe has avoided public accountability by refusing to debate the issues publicly, omitting publication of key health data, massaging published data, and unforgivably accusing critics of spreading disinformation. These approaches are worthy of a dictatorship but not a modern democracy.
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet…we never seem to believe them. In this Stew Peters Network EXCLUSIVE, the award winning filmmakers behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES present the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.
Recently we posted another interview with this brave and honorable Funeral Director Brenton Faithfull … his interview with Doctor Matt Shelton from NZDSOS. This interview with Liz Gunn follows up on his experience since the hit piece published by Stuff.co.nz. He is simply asking the questions MSM is not asking, nor is our government and instead, continues in its urging to ‘get jabbed’ rather than investigate the elephant in the room … very high all cause mortality stats in NZ. (See here also). Listen at the link below. EWR
Brenton Faithfull is a Funeral Director and a Justice of the Peace. He is well aware of the importance of the truth. Hear his interview with Dr Matt Shelton of the NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS).
The record rates of excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated countries including New Zealand show that a disaster has expanded silently and spread rapidly fanned by biotechnology lobbying and government sponsored pandemic policies. How did this happen? (If you have heretofore closed your eyes and ears, mind or heart to the accumulating scientific evidence of Covid vaccine harm published in journals, but now you wish to catch up, you can reference this succinct review on substack).
The Gates Foundation, the CDC, and our NZ health data
On Tuesday 2nd November 2021, almost a year ago, there was a meeting of the New Zealand Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV-TAG) upon which the government relies for pandemic advice. The Chair of the group is Dr. Ian Town, Chief Science Advisor to the government. “There were nine members present including Dr. Petousis-Harris, a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland who also advises Pfizer (an obvious conflict of interest), plus eight officials from the Ministry of Health, and four other guests.”
Sitting in on the meeting as a guest was Mr. John Tait, an obstetrician, the interim director and Chief Medical Officer of Te Whata Ora—Health New Zealand which was soon to take over the entire health system of New Zealand, taking it out of the diversified control of District Health Boards and into the direct control of the Government.
The meeting was taking place just a few days after Jacinda Ardern with the full support of the Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (19 October minutes point 3.0) announced sweeping Covid vaccine mandates affecting private and public sectors with the intention of 100% compliance (it would eventually reach close to 95% of the eligible population, among the highest in the world). Ardern would soon publicly admit that the aim was to make life very difficult for anyone who refused vaccination.
Point 8.3 in the minutes of the 2nd Nov 2021 meeting released under an OIA request is entitled Research Extension: Establishing a foundation for monitoring the safety of Covid-19 vaccines using primary care data. It was approved that the University of Auckland be allowed to extend a research project to establish background rates of adverse events of special interest (AESI) of COVID-19 vaccines from hospital discharge data and enable a foundation for monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines using New Zealand primary care data.
The research project referred to is a partnership between the University of Auckland and the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) to monitor adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines around the world. Dr Petousis-Harris is co-director of GVDN which has been funded by the Gates Foundation and the US CDC.
The GVDN website says it is aiming to set up global surveillance infrastructure capable of responding to safety signals post-introduction of Covid-19 vaccines. This sounds like a laudable organisation intent on protecting public health, but.…
The other co-director of GVDN is US vaccine advocate Dr. Stephen Black emeritus professor University of Cincinnati, a pediatric infectious disease specialist. In an interview he paints a radically different picture of GVDN and indicates it is actually an organisation primarily aimed to fight vaccine hesitancy:
“While vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccine communication have become global, the ability to respond to such concerns has remained largely fractured, without coordination between countries. This project is a game-changer. Through its scale, transparency, timeliness and open communication [???], it will contribute to vaccine confidence around the world.”
It is easy to appreciate what a prize access to New Zealand health data seemed to be for an organisation devoted to combating vaccine hesitancy and to their sponsors including the Gates Foundation and the US CDC. A remote nation with a team of five million people prepared to:
Close their borders completely to travel,
Use a single vaccine,
Coerce the entire population to be vaccinated
Collect centralised data from a universal healthcare system
Largely refuse vaccine exemptions
Seize any potential competing treatments such as ivermectin at customs.
What a contrast to the US, which has a diverse private healthcare system, a porous border, a wide range of treatments, a multiplicity of available vaccines, and a population with a tradition of freedom of medical choice.
Almost a year has gone by since GVDN was uniquely granted access to New Zealand’s primary health care data. Data that has not been made publicly available in our own country. Essential safety data that has been repeatedly requested by New Zealand researchers but remains hidden. During this time, our all cause mortality has risen to record levels close to 35% above seasonally adjusted historical trends but the New Zealand public has been given no comprehensive and accurate information about its cause by GVDN who have the data, despite its stated aim to respond to safety signals.
To establish the cause of the unprecedented rate of all cause mortality and the potential impact of vaccination on health, a researcher would need details of vaccination status and cause of death or hospital admission data broken down by age. In other words, the primary healthcare data that GVDN has access to.
Has GVDN gone largely quiet because the data shows that something has gone terribly wrong with vaccine safety?
The silence is deafening, few if any New Zealanders are aware that GVDN exists. The main source of public information is repeated government funded advertisements encouraging booster uptake along with fawning MSM articles. New Zealanders have been deliberately kept in the dark.
From the meagre information and bland safety assurances the government and MSM have publicised, it is hard to escape the notion that those with medical authority including establishment scientific bodies are happy for pandemic causal investigation to be either oversimplified for public consumption as solely the result of ‘Covid infection’ or remain largely out of the public domain.
There are some really big questions here. How much was the New Zealand government pandemic policy coordinated to suit the agenda of Pfizer, the Gates Foundation, and the US CDC? Ardern made an abrupt change between September 21st 2021 when she said there would be no penalties for the unvaccinated and October 11th 2021 when she introduced coercive mandates. What changed her mind? Was a decision taken in this period to view the New Zealand public as suitable participants in a global study?
The dangers are obvious. CV-TAG, the Ministry of Health, the government, and the University of Auckland handed over information vital for vaccine safety monitoring to an unregulated global body—GVDN—committed to eradicate vaccine hesitancy. Had the main players, including Ardern, began to aspire to leading roles in a naisant proto-global crusading medical decision-making structure?
It is startling how, in such an unregulated global organisation, the health and safety of national populations such as ours can begin to take a backseat. Had the offered carrot to become ‘a world leader in suppressing vaccine hesitancy and proving the efficacy and safety of novel biotechnology’ swayed minds to the extent that accepted standards of caution, medical ethics, and public safety could be fudged?
Just how far will the government and the medical establishment be prepared to go to sweep excess deaths data under the carpet?
This week the Justice Committee tabled a Coroners Amendment Bill for public consultation. The public has until Wednesday at the latest to make a submission here. Among its key provisions the Bill would make it clear that:
‘Coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act’
In other words, coroners might be able to ease off in their traditional role to diligently pursue a cause of death. Yet any reliable mortality research requires that cause of death be made available as accurately as possible. Enabling coroners to record “unascertained natural causes” as a cause of death diminishes the availability of information vital for basic research on public health and vaccine safety.
At a time when dietary and environmental inputs and medical procedures are rapidly changing, it is essential that all possible efforts be made to ensure as much information be made available to researchers. Instead such access to the needed New Zealand health data has been quietly granted to GVDN, a global organisation with the avowed aim of tackling vaccine hesitancy.
Despite this, it remains true that deaths do not go away, they may at first be ignored, swept under the carpet, or labelled ‘unascertained’, but if excess mortality builds up, as it has, an unstoppable natural process to restore the balance of truth is set in motion. People care about their children, their families, and their loved ones. They don’t forget.
Any organisation which seeks to hide information will eventually be scrutinised. An accounting is inevitable. It may be postponed for a while, but the greater the contrived delay, the greater the perceived error.
How did those promoting mRNA vaccination get it so wrong?
Those who in November 2021 handed over New Zealand health data access were no doubt expecting a success story to unfold which would win themselves and New Zealand global plaudits and prestige. They got it wrong because they misunderstood the basic science and the safety issues of biotechnology (for more information watch my video The Pandemic of Biotechnology).
It is now clear that the toxicity of novel genetic material and its mobility were underestimated from the origin of the pandemic through to the rapid development of gene-based vaccines. More importantly, the complexity and hierarchy of genetic command and control systems in the physiology were misunderstood and oversimplified.
Certainly, it was realised that single genes do not have a single function. Genetic material and epigenetic partner structures are known to have multiple functions and to act in consort with other genes-based systems, but how many interlocking functions there are in the complexity of human physiology was radically underestimated.
Moreover, it was assumed that microbiological processes, which constantly clean up errors, foreign bodies, pathogens, and expended biomolecules, would be able to cope with injected genetic instructions and limit the extent of their influence in physiological and societal space, and over time. This assumption has proved to be in error.
The overly simplified theoretical understanding of mRNA action, and the very few experiments to assess this, were wholly inadequate to model actual in vivo processes and potential adverse effects. Moreover, negative outcomes were hidden. These have now become apparent as a result of the court-ordered release of Pfizer trial data. Data that has confirmed concerning deaths following vaccination.
What are the lessons?
Poorly-scienced public health ideas and commercial pressures have been hard at work. Naive biotech health expectations fueledm by public relations stories have played a role. Biotech vaccine innovation rapidly became a financial juggernaut whose profits exceeded commercial projections by at least ten fold. This attracted hot and greedy investment money, some of it shared by media ownership platforms. Access to New Zealand data became a prized target.
There is very little that commands respect or confidence in the pandemic response, and much to criticize. Missing in the rush to novel biomedical technology is a clear understanding of the roots of health. Our health is 99% determined by our diet, lifestyle, environment, the air we breathe, and above all by our mental equilibrium. Those in charge of New Zealand’s health chose to ignore these strong time-tested natural defenses as they enrolled us all, including our children, in a giant biotech experiment.
In a symbolic and very real way the pandemic is the beginning of the end for our medical systems, as we have known them. It was caused by all the inherent contradictions in our profit-orientated pharmaceutical/medical system, which allowed lax control of biotechnology research. Thinking that biotechnology can solve everything will always be remembered as an example of the hubris and greed of the human race. As a result we must become more respectful and more aware of the enormous complexity and protective efficiency of natural immunity and unmodified human genetics.
What stayed in my memory from our coverage was the visit the residents got just weeks before the fire, instructing them to remain in their apartments if a fire should ever break out. Recordings of phone calls revealed this is what they did. One was left with the feeling that it was a complete cover up … may justice be done for those victims, many more it would appear, than the ‘official’ account gave us. EWR
Watch at the link below as Mark Steele gives his opinion on this event as being linked to smart meters:
A court in France has found in favour of a farmer who claimed that a 4G antenna was damaging his cows’ health, and has ordered for the antenna to be switched off for two months.
The administrative court in Clermont-Ferrand (Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes) ordered the switch-off after Frédéric Salgues, a farmer in Haute-Loire, said he suspected that it was damaging his herd’s health.
The court said that “it is appropriate to order the temporary cessation of the operation of this antenna for a period of two months, taking into account its general impact, with monitoring, by the judicial expert, of the behaviour of the herd, and of the dairy cows in particular, during this period”.
Operator Orange now has three months to act in accordance with the ruling, including stopping the antenna’s operation while ensuring phone coverage, including emergency calls, for Orange users in the area affected.
After the decision, Mr Salgues told the AFP that he hoped his cows would be able to “recover as soon as possible” and called the case ruling “a major relief and a victory”.
Mr Salgues said that since the antenna’s installation in July 2021 – 200 metres away from his farm in Mazeyrat-d’Allier (Haute-Loire) – around 40 of his normally-200-strong herd had died, and milk production had decreased by 15-20% within days of the antenna being switched on.
He said: “There are no medical elements that could [otherwise] explain this brutal drop in milk production.”
Philippe Molhérat, the mayor of Mazeyrat-d’Allier, who had previously authorised the antenna’s installation, testified in favour of the farmer.
He said that he feared “a catastrophe on a human level” and that his “concerns” were growing for the 1,500 inhabitants of his village.
Yet, lawyers for the mobile operators affected by the ruling, which as well as Orange also included Free and Bouygues Telecom, said that there was “no scientific evidence” that there is a link between animal health and electromagnetic fields surrounding mobile phone antennas.
It comes as the rollout of 5G, which promises even faster internet speeds than 4G, has prompted controversy in France. Many antennas have been vandalised, and even been blamed (in a now-debunked theory) for the spread of Covid-19.
Yet, French health and safety agency l’Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire (Anses) has repeatedly said that current scientific studies suggest that 5G antennas “do not present any notable risks to health because they use frequencies very close to previous generations of connectivity”.
But, but … I thought the VX would save us from the grave? ……EWR
Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population.
– “…The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas. From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley”
Did A Vaccine Experiment on US Soliders Cause “The Spanish Flu” Epidemic? – By Kevin Barry
The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19. What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin? Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry. In looking back on the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I, we need to delve deeper to solve this mystery.
“There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released. Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.” Hatchard Report
Yesterday there was a short article in the NZ Herald which discussed the release by the Ministry of Health of some data. The day before, writing in his column in the Northern Advocate, local opposition MP Dr Shane Reti reported that incidents of self harm among 10-14 year olds have increased by 30 percent since the arrival of Covid.
Disturbing though this is, the response was also disturbing, Shane Reti was admonished for writing about the data which was provided to him by the Ministry of Health. According to the article, Dr Reti should have asked the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little first. The Northern Advocate and Dr Reti apologised for the ‘confusion’ this caused.
Covid-19 data is being hidden There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released.
Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.
Yesterday our courts were also pondering the paucity of information released and its misleading character—some doctors and teachers were asking for a relaxing of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination mandates. Following the press coverage, it seems that the arguments being debated have already been decided by mainstream media for us.
The arguments are really very simple and the ‘facts’ are equally so. A tsunami of adverse effects Medsafe has published a summary of 53,000 adverse effects reported to them following Covid-19 vaccination. This is a per capita rate 30 times larger than that of any previous vaccination programme, and Medsafe itself admits that adverse effects are grossly underreported and uses the figure 95% unreported.
Now correct me if I’m wrong, but if I was in Medsafe or in politics I would be wanting to investigate this alarming figure more thoroughly. Given that a large percentage of our population are already affected and possibly at risk in the future, I would look very closely not just at the reports themselves but also at the specific categories of risk that Pfizer itself has already flagged. This is a very long list, now publicly available.
How would I do that? I would compile hospital admission data and GP visit data for these conditions. From Dr Shane Reti’s column, it appears that the Ministry of Health might have already done this, but they haven’t released the data and our politicians appear to be very worried that they might do so without first asking the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little. Very Little data has reached our ears.
I would also require an enhanced use of autopsy to determine if there were any unusual characteristics of deaths proximate to mRNA Covid vaccination similar to those reported overseas. These include preponderance of micro blood clotting, changes in character and viscosity of blood, and major organ damage.
Public Statement by Guy Hatchard Ph.D. Following a meeting with the Chief Commissioner Paul Hunt of the NZ Human Rights Commission
23 February 2022
Dear Commissioner
Thank you for providing the opportunity to present to yourself and staff yesterday afternoon. I did so as an individual scientist but on the invitation of Voices For Freedom. I remain independent of groups, but maintain communication with many groups and colleagues on scientific issues.
I am not a protestor, nor do I have any history prior to the pandemic of publicly opposing vaccination. I am formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
I am a long standing advocate of the benefits and safety of those natural approaches to diet and medicine which have been adequately scientifically verified. I have my own website, HatchardReport.com.
At the conclusion of the meeting you said that the HRC would make a public statement and left the participants free to make public statements themselves. Thank you.
This morning I read your public statement following the meeting which affirms that you feel a duty to listen, and adduces “It’s clear that the protesters who I have met with have very real stories of loss and suffering. They feel broken and discarded due to the impact of Covid-19 health measures on their lives.” You also expressed a measure of caution.
As a person experienced in the analysis of data and the assessment of scientific information, I am increasingly aware of deficiencies in official NZ pandemic data and its use to support continuations of now outdated government policy. Outdated government policy and incomplete official data directly impacts the rights of individuals.
For example, since 21 August 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been publishing data related to the Covid outbreak in a cumulative fashion. This data shows that 60% of cases occur in the vaccinated (against a vaccinated population rate of 79%), and that 70% of hospitalisations are among the unvaccinated.
This appears to strongly support vaccination, however it is misleading due to the cumulative nature of the data, (and incidentally because of the way vaccination status is categorised). Cumulative data only reveals the average of the whole outbreak, not the current daily and weekly trends.
Since October 2021, members of my support team have been calculating ‘snapshots’ of data by subtracting report data from each subsequent report. This has allowed me to see the current burden of cases by vaccination status for any specific time period, and to calculate the hospitalisation risk disparity for cases by vaccination status. Below is an example of the data between February 17 and 18:
This snapshot data paints a very different and relevant picture. It is indicative that during the present phase of our Covid outbreak, those that are vaccinated may be at slightly higher risk of hospitalisation than those who are unvaccinated. The general trends and overseas data support this concern.
You will be well aware that this is in contrast to government and media messaging strongly encouraging booster vaccinations as essential. If you ignore the crucial issue of very high rates of adverse effects, this could possibly be supported by the historical cumulative Covid data, but it is certainly not supported by current data.
The reason for the ineffectiveness of mRNA vaccination must also be obvious to you from yesterday’s presentations and the supporting submissions provided to you by presenters. The characteristics of Omicron are quite different from those of Delta. Omicron is a variant that has adapted to prefer infection of vaccinated individuals. From the perspective of genomics, this results from the well documented path of viral evolution.
I note that Medsafe has admitted in small print on its website, generally unnoticed and uncommented by media, that the phenomenon of vaccine acquired immune deficiency (which I allude to above) is a risk about which they have concern.
The Human Rights implications of this are also obvious. Incentives and encouragement to vaccinate, when its benefit is in doubt, but the risk of harm is well documented, do not amount to a process of informed consent or medical risk mitigation. Today in your public statement you clearly extend personal sympathy to those affected by adverse vaccine reactions.
Many among the wider population are becoming aware of risks through personal experiences. For example a friend of mine is a director of a large business, one of his relatives has been affected by myocarditis, but his work colleagues remained sceptical of any risk.
Recently the father of one of their employees had a booster shot immediately followed by a massive heart attack. As a result, the opinion of his colleagues has swung back in full support of my friend’s informed choice. This kind of experience is reforming public opinion up and down the country (and even I have heard in Parliament). It is no surprise that booster uptake has barely reached 50% of those eligible.
I come to the point of my writing, in addition to a big thank you for taking the time to listen at length, I submit that the human rights abuses are a matter of daily misery for many, extending to some dramatic and devastating personal health impacts which are escalating as booster shots are rolled out. In my opinion, it is not tenable to delay action.
The government has curated extremes of public opinion fearful of Covid outcomes, in favour of experimental mRNA vaccination, and prejudiced against those reluctant to vaccinate. As you know, this has extended to punitive measures.
As published evidence has accumulated which points to increased health risks of vaccination and therefore a need to revise policy, the government has dug its heels in and doubled down on announcements of vaccine safety and effectiveness. The Ministry of Health’s restricted presentation of data along with its refusal to institute mandatory reporting of adverse effects verges on the deliberately misleading and implies a cover up.
I surmise from your extensive history of supporting human rights, that you will know there is a fine line between unfortunate mistakes and deliberate suppression of fact. I believe that line is now being crossed in New Zealand.
Leadership in this situation involves a willingness to speak up, even if the message may be unwelcome, and a capacity to change direction. Every day that passes by without action means growing economic misery and exclusion for some and crucially some serious health incidents for others. There is an imperative for the Commission to stand up and say unequivocally there is a case which has been made and needs to be answered. A case that requires an open public dialogue.
Therefore I warmly welcome your statement:
“The job given to the Human Rights Commission, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata, by Parliament is to listen, conciliate, educate and advance human rights and responsibilities for all”
I am asking you here to follow this statement with a timely call for a wider public process that will go beyond a possibly poorly informed, and certainly based on past experience, opaque review confined within the corridors of parliamentary power. The HRC is there to protect and uphold rights independently from parliament.
As I indicated in my submission, incidence of adverse effects and death proximate to Covid vaccination in NZ and elsewhere have far surpassed thresholds set by medical ethics and protocol that should also trigger an immediate pause in vaccination. This is not a time to delay, the situation has already passed beyond a point requiring prompt action. Can you please advise me of the intended HRC time frame?
I will, as you have already indicated I may, make this statement publicly available.
I look forward to hearing more from the Commission shortly. I remain ready to provide any scientific information you need within a short time frame. As you know, I have already submitted to the HRC a list of 1000 published papers on adverse effects of mRNA vaccination.
I reject this Amendment Bill as well as the original Health Response Bill No.1. In particular I reject all aspects of it related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Any continued roll out of the current mass vaccine programme, especially the continuation and increasing powers of vaccine mandates through Vaccine certificates and ‘no jab, no job’ is by law a crime against humanity according to the 1947 Nuremberg Code (see Appendix for reference) as well as the NZ Bill of Rights. Even ‘coercion’ for the COVID-19 vaccine is classified as a crime against humanity according to the Nuremberg Code…
The New Zealand public have every right to be concerned and to want more information about some very disturbing aspects of the current mass vaccine roll out.
The New Zealand Herald’s recent article called ‘The 90% Project: 10 of the biggest vaccine myths debunked’ is an alarming confirmation and reinforcement of what many Kiwis already know very well. The mainstream media in NZ has become nothing but a bought and paid for propaganda mouth-piece for Jacinda Ardern and the NZ government. Jacinda has already publicly announced herself to be ‘the one source of truth’ on COVID-19. Any other information, no matter how credible, no matter how scientifically proven and robust it is, should not be listened to. Anything other than Jacinda’s ‘one source of truth’ is to be considered and labelled as ‘misinformation’. To ensure the NZ people are not getting anything other than her ‘one source of truth’, Jacinda Ardern paid $55 million to NZ mainstream media networks to ensure that they stay exactly on message with her ‘one source of truth’ and obediently keep pumping out the required narrative. As the NZ Herald have just done.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black with this article by the NZ Herald when they accuse others of ‘misinformation’ regarding COVID-19 vaccines as they supposedly debunk the worst of the so-called misinformation. How well does their debunking operation stand up to a little bit of actual evidence based journalistic scrutiny? We’ll have a look at that more specifically in Part 2 when we scrutinise and dissect the specific 10 points of the NZ Herald’s so-called vaccine myth debunking.
But before we do that, it’s very worthwhile to gain a little real-life perspective on this by putting forward just a few names of the type of people who are going against Jacinda Ardern’s ‘one of source of truth’ narrative on COVID-19 and the vaccines. Let’s look at the type of people that are spreading this awful ‘misinformation’, as Jacinda and the NZ Herald like to call it.
Dr Robert Malone – the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology that is now being rolled out across the world. Dr Malone believes that this vaccine technology should never be used on human beings like this and is strongly against the current vaccine rollout. Here are several quotes from Dr Malone regarding the current use of the mRNA vaccine technology that he helped to invent;
“We don’t fully understand the risks of these EXPERIMENTAL products”
“Fauci is flying by the seat of his pants and substituting opinion for data because there is no data to support their decisions”
“Vaccines are not linear and more is not always better. Sometimes MORE CAN TURN OFF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM”
“How do you reconcile that this drug (Ivermectin) is being used in emerging economies across the world to good effect but is being trashed in Western media. These folks are bought and paid for and they are acting in a concerted way to enhance the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical companies have basically bought and paid for our whole congress. There’s so much money sloshing around in Big Pharma they are ABLE TO CORRUPT ALMOST EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH. They have compromised our entire government, big tech and media”
That is a fairly relevant person to be listening to. At the bottom of this article there is a full list of 15 very relevant quotes that Dr Malone has made about the experimental vaccine technology he helped invent.
Dr Michael Yeadon – former Vice President of Pfizer and former Chief Scientist of Pfizer. Dr Yeadon has strongly campaigned against the COVID-19 vaccines and has said that people must avoid the ‘experimental gene based procedures’ at all costs.
Dr Sucharit Bhakdi – one of the leading medical microbiologists and immunologists in the world and has conducted research at the Max Planck Institute of Immunology in Freiburg and at the Protein Laboratory in Copenhagen. Dr Bhakdi joined the Institute of Medical Microbiology Giessen University and was named Chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz. He has published over 300 articles in the field of immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and received the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.
Here is a quote from Dr Bhakdi;
“Gene-based vaccination of children is something that is so criminal that I have no words to express my horror…………We are horribly worried that there’s going to be an impact on fertility. And this will be seen in years or decades from now. And this is potentially one of the greatest crimes, simply one of the greatest crimes imaginable”
Kary Mullis – the inventor of the PCR test used to test for COVID-19. Kary Mullis is on record saying that the PCR test cannot be used as a diagnostic tool in any way like it has been used with COVID-19 diagnosis. If used in the way it has been, it would not be able to specifically isolate and identify an active COVID-19 virus. The PCR test would not be able to differentiate between common cold, normal flu, live COVID-19 virus, or dead COVID-19 virus from months ago. If that is true, and he should know, then it means the entire COVID-19 pandemic is thrown into disarray because every single COVID-19 statistic and analysis is based around the results of that PCR test.
Is this the reason that deaths from seasonal flu have plummeted to virtually zero in many countries? Is this why a huge percentage of those testing positive have absolutely no symptoms? Even the World Health Organisation have now conceded the PCR test is not fit for purpose and a new test will be brought in from December. So why hasn’t Jacinda told us this and why hasn’t she stopped using the PCR test? Auckland is still in Level 3 lockdown as we speak, based purely on what that unfit for purpose PCR test has falsely been saying.
That is just a brief starting list of the type of people and calibre of people that Jacinda Ardern and the NZ Herald are accusing of spreading destructive ‘misinformation’. We can add to that list tens of thousands of other leading scientists and front-line COVID doctors and nurses, as well as top universities such as Oxford and Stanford who are speaking out and presenting evidence that in many cases is strongly contradictory to Jacinda Ardern’s ‘one source of truth’.
An important point to ponder here is that many of the scientists, doctors, and nurses who are coming forward to speak out with this ‘misinformation’ are usually at extreme risk of losing their job by taking that action. Why would they do that unless they were very sure of what they were saying, and extremely passionate and desperate to get that vital information out to the public?
But Jacinda says we should just listen to her ‘one source of truth’, and her bought and paid for media mouth-pieces like the NZ Herald. We should ignore what these other people are saying. “Do as I say or I’ll lock you down“. “Do as I say or your business will be shut down”. “Take the vaccine or I’ll take away your freedoms and your human rights and I’ll lock you out of society with my new Vaccine Passport”. “I am your one and only source of truth”. Well, there’s a word for that kind of language. That word is ‘Dictator’. And there’s a word for that kind of leadership. That word is ‘Tyranny’.
Essentially this means some kind of a Vaccine Passport where only the vaccinated are free to move around and interact more fully in society. A shocking two-tier system of society with abhorrent types of discrimination against those who dare to uphold their international human rights, including the 1947 Nuremberg Code, and make their personal, informed choice not to take the experimental vaccine. A new class of sub-humans will be formed. The ‘un-vaxxed’, who will be severely punished for their lack of obedience to Jacinda’s directives. The ‘Let’s be kind to each other’ mantra isn’t looking quite so kind now. The team of 5 million won’t be quite as united and equal.
We already have some real-life working models underway of what the Vaccine Passport strategy does to society. It utterly rips it apart. France has had nationwide street protests of hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps millions, right across the country every weekend for 11 straight weekends (at the time of writing) protesting against the Vaccine Passport which is already in operation in France. People in France are so against the Vaccine Passport that they now gather in the streets outside the restaurant areas and set up their own picnics sitting in the street outside the restaurants that they are now excluded from due to the Vaccine Passport. It is just simply an unimaginable situation on every level of humanity.
The ‘dirty, un-clean’ segment of society forced to stay outside. Only the clean or pure segment of society are free to go into certain places or travel. Papers please! Sound familiar? It’s chilling!! Do you think this is being overblown? Let’s hear it directly from the Premier of Queensland who said “I myself wouldn’t want to be around the unvaccinated”.
In Australia it’s even worse than France. The ‘no jab, no job’ policy being ruthlessly enforced in Australia is now literally creating a civil war of the Australian people versus the Australian police and government. We now have scenes of armoured vehicles rolling down the main street of Melbourne. On September 21st we had the truly horrific scenes of hundreds of protestors, who were losing their jobs due to the ‘no jab, no job’ policy, gathering at the place that had the most meaning to them in this situation. They gathered at the Australian Memorial that is there to commemorate those past Australians, including the ANZACs, who had fought for and died for the freedoms and human rights of Australia, New Zealand, and other countries. Those protestors were sitting peacefully around the memorial building chanting ‘we want peace, we want freedom’ towards the army of several hundred heavily armed police ‘storm troopers’ lined up in front of them. Those storm troopers then charged at them, shooting people in the back as they fled from the high velocity rubber bullet firearms being shot at them by their own Australian police force. Their own police force that they pay for. The ANZACs would have literally been turning in their graves. Here is a sad and disturbing video and photo collation of what the ‘no jab, no job’ policy has created in Australia.
Where has the NZ Herald’s coverage and condemnation of this been?
So those are a couple of real-life working examples for Jacinda Ardern to contemplate in terms of what a Vaccine Passport does to a country and unite her team of 5 million as she begins rolling out her Kiwi version of the Vaccine Passport and ‘no jab, no entry (or no job)’. The scenes in Australia seemingly having no effect at all on Jacinda’s strategic decision making. Never has our NZ national anthem been so relevant. God defend New Zealand!
Why is Jacinda Ardern not talking about Israel and Iceland? The two most vaccinated nations on the planet who now have ‘COVID numbers’ absolutely exploding? Israel is the most vaccinated country in the world. They began vaccinations back in January with the objective of vaccinating the entire population. They are the working example, or experiment may be a more accurate term, for the rest of the world because they are the furthest down the mass vaccination pathway.
Israel was the first to implement very strict Vaccine Passports in order to rapidly push the vaccine percentage up, and at present they have approximately 80% of their population double jabbed. After around 6 months the statistics showed that many of the people being hospitalised with ‘COVID’ were actually the double vaccinated. The apparent effectiveness of the vaccine was declining, according to their scientists. For that reason, they recently introduced the ‘booster shot’ (Dose 3). They double downed on the same strategy. The graph below shows very clearly what has occurred in Israel as a result of their mass double jab strategy followed by the Dose 3 booster shot to try to get things back on track. Catastrophic. Does this graph look like this experimental mass vaccine strategy is the way out of COVID?
If anything, it provides strong evidence to support what Dr Malone, the inventor of this mRNA vaccine, specifically warned about. That this mass global vaccine strategy would result in an explosion of COVID, not a decrease. This is a quote from Dr Malone about this;
“OVERUSE (mass vaccination) of vaccines will DRIVE THE DEVELOPMENT of viruses that are able to evade vaccination”
The Israel graph shockingly confirms exactly what Dr Malone and many other leading immunologists around the world warned about. The FDA (Food & Drug Agency) also reacted strongly to the awful picture coming out of Israel. Numerous scientists and doctors made a combined presentation on September 17th to an FDA panel outlining the evidence and concerns around many aspects of experimental mRNA vaccines, including the alarming situation in Israel shown above. On the basis of that presentation, the FDA panel voted 16-2 in favour of halting the Dose 3 booster shot in the United States for people aged under 65 years. FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save as they vote 16 – 2 against the approval of booster shots – The Expose
Why haven’t Jacinda or the NZ Herald reported on these stunning and crucial developments?
Instead of pulling back and taking a more cautious approach on the mass vaccine strategy on the basis of this alarming information, Jacinda Ardern, the NZ government, and their mouth-piece the NZ Herald have instead taken the totally opposite approach and have instead put the foot firmly on the accelerator of the mass vaccine strategy with the ‘let’s hit 90%’ marketing campaign.
The NZ Herald is supposed to be a media outlet. A place where journalists investigate and report on news that is important and/or interesting to society. What the NZ Herald did with their article ‘The 90% Project: 10 of the biggest vaccine myths debunked’ was to instead take the role of Jacinda Ardern’s personal COVID-19 PR department. It was a crude and blatant attempt to try to implement some form of damage control for Jacinda and the NZ government with all the damning information that is flooding the various information platforms that are still allowed to present information that challenges the gospel narrative of the ‘one source of truth’. Those platforms are sadly getting fewer and fewer as big tech censorship and Jacinda’s ‘hate speech’ legislation takes full effect. Here is another example of the mainstream media bought and paid for to spin the Big Pharma mass vaccine narrative. Here we have the trusted BBC (heavily funded by Bill Gates and Big Pharma) giving their interpretation/spin of the COVID and vaccine data.
Surely the huge story here for the BBC should be the two thirds who ARE vaccinated but are still testing positive for COVID. Is there a corporate Big Pharma agenda at play by our mainstream media as Dr Malone suggested earlier? It sure does look like it.
Here is a final point before Part 2 specifically examines the 10 points of ‘misinformation’ raised by the NZ Herald. When we are assessing the wide variety of information that comes forth regarding important issues such as COVID-19 and the vaccine issue, we should try to assess who has more credibility with the message they are bringing forward. A large percentage of the frontline scientists, doctors, nurses, and paramedics who are speaking out with information about COVID-19 and the vaccines that contradicts the ‘official narrative’ are at very high risk of losing their careers and their livelihood by doing so. Their numbers are huge and rapidly growing around the world. They are not shown on mainstream news. As just one example of this here is an emotional ‘plea from the heart’ from Dr Anne McCloskey, a GP in Ireland on the COVID front-line. She was immediately suspended. Dr McCloskey’s message here, and her immediate suspension, is sadly the case with courageous professionals in great numbers all over the world. The Shots Are Killing People by Dr. Anne McCloskey, Her Medical License Was Suspended For This Video (bitchute.com)
The scientists and doctors who are on television on the mainstream ‘6 o’clock’ news are almost exclusively supporting the government/Big Pharma narrative and they are not putting their careers and livelihoods at risk with their message. Are they also getting paid by someone to present the message they are presenting? Are they perhaps being paid by Big Pharma to push a certain narrative that supports Big Pharma making gargantuan sized profits from the mass COVID vaccine industry? Is that why they are the ones selected to be on the news on television and in the newspapers? Who knows. That would need an entire article on its own. But it is pretty clear out of those two camps who has the most credibility regarding how truthful and factual their information likely is, and what their intent is for presenting that information to us.
In Part 2 of this article we will specifically address each of the 10 points that the NZ Herald have supposedly debunked and see how well they stand up to some proper journalistic scrutiny.
Appendix
15 REASONS WHY MASS COVID ‘VACCINATION’ IS A VERY BAD IDEA – FROM ONE OF THE PIONEERS OF THE mRNA VACCINE DELIVERY PLATFORM DR ROBERT MALONE
1) “We don’t fully understand the risks of these EXPERIMENTAL products”
2) “What we’re doing by excessively using vaccines for people who don’t really need it is that we’re DRIVING THE VIRUS to be able to ESCAPE the benefits of the vaccine through evolutionary selection”.
3) “I strongly believe against mandatory vaccinations the main reasons being it’s NOT ETHICAL and it’s not good medical practice from the standpoint of a virologist and vaccinologist”.
4) “We know that NATURAL INFECTION provides broader and longer lasting by up to 20 TIMES a more effective immune response in terms of preventing reinfection compared to the vaccine”
5) “We know from medicating animals indiscriminately; these practices lead to superbugs which then turn around and ATTACK US. It’s the same basic logic with vaccines”
6) “OVERUSE (mass vaccination) of vaccines will DRIVE THE DEVELOPMENT of viruses that are able to evade vaccination”
7) “The people that will suffer from this naive inappropriate policy of global universal enforced vaccination are going to be the people who are high risk”
8) “Vaccinating in some ways maybe worse as the vaccinated that do have breakthrough infections are walking around feeling relatively healthy and producing and shedding just as much virus without knowing”
9) “The policy is poorly thought out. Is this incompetence or is this the consequence of the pressure of the pharma industry on the people making decisions?”
10) “These are leaky vaccinations which won’t get us back to normal and these viruses will spread through the population”
11) “Fauci is flying by the seat of his pants and substituting opinion for data because there is no data to support their decisions”
12) “Vaccines are not linear and more is not always better. Sometimes MORE CAN TURN OFF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM”
13) “We have to get back to evidence-based medicine and STOP BUREAUCRATS DICTATING how to practice medicine”
14) “For some reason the government is adamantly opposed to early treatment. It’s bad policy and BAD MEDICINE. When have we ever had a situation where patients go to the emergency room they say ‘I’m having trouble breathing doc’. And they test your oxygen levels and the doctor says ‘well your levels are low but not really low… go back home and come back when you’re really sick’. This is insanity”
15) “How do you reconcile that this drug (Ivermectin) is being used in emerging economies across the world to good effect but is being trashed in Western media. These folks are bought and paid for and they are acting in a concerted way to enhance the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical companies have basically bought and paid for our whole congress. There’s so much money sloshing around in Big Pharma they are ABLE TO CORRUPT ALMOST EVERYTHING THEY TOUCH. They have compromised our entire government, big tech and media”
The UK Medicine Regulator has responded to a Freedom of Information request demanding to know how many deaths have occurred in the past 20 years due to all vaccines, and their response has revealed that there have been four times as many deaths in just eight months due to the Covid-19 injections.
The request was made via email to the Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on the 6th August 2021 in which a Mr Anderson asked the MHRA the following questions –
You must be logged in to post a comment.