I'm for justice and equity for all peoples everywhere. I am also for exposing lies and corruption, particularly the lies of the corporations that have a tight grip on humanity, all for profit and control. A grip that has been instrumental in the rape and pillage of indigenous peoples planet wide, for centuries.
Did you catch the official disinformation today? [From Dr Michael Baker]. We wonder if The AM Show will find their integrity and publish a correction? How completely clueless are these people? Or was this more than clueless? How can a top scientific “expert” be so ill-informed? Stay informed, incredible people! www.voicesforfreedom.co.nz/join-us
VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 438,441 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 9,048 deaths and 41,015 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 2, 2021.
Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) included 9,049 reports of deaths, across all age groups, following COVID vaccines — an increase of more than 2,000 compared with the previous week. The data comes directly from reports submitted to theVaccine Adverse Event Reporting System(VAERS).
VAERSis the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Every Friday,VAERSmakes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date.
Data released today show that between Dec. 14, 2020…
Distraught people who trusted the system. As I’ve noticed myself listening to the many videos & reports by innocent folk who lined up trustingly to take the shot that would protect them so they could travel and return to normal, let down & betrayed by the system. Folks they are not promising you’ll be protected at all. The best they can do is mitigate symptoms. And the vaxxed are getting the CV anyway. Proceed at your own risk. At least read the evidence. The dismayed folk called us conspiracy theorists and even scoffed and mocked us. Now they pay, sometimes with their very lives. Please do listen to the warnings. And read. Read the very real evidence that we now have to look at. Ask yourself why do they not want you seeing VAERS?
Comments by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News
Over 6 months into the mass vaccination campaign with the experimental, non-FDA approved COVID-19 shots, where about half of the U.S. population now has received at least one of these injections, tens of thousands of victims are beginning to speak out, regretting their choices, and begging for help.
The medical community by and large has turned their backs on them, which is really what they have done for the past 40+ years with ALL vaccine injured people, most of whom have been children prior to the COVID-19 shots.
So while those speaking out in the past have been primarily parents of vaccine-damaged children that the corporate media and medical system have summarily dismissed as “crazy,” now those speaking out are primarily adults who have had their lives ruined by these injections. Pro-vaccine adults, obviously, since they chose to receive one of these shots, that many dissenting medical doctors and scientists are now calling “bioweapon” shots.
At least they still have a voice to speak out, as thousands of others are now dead following the shots, according to CDC statistics.
Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess. mRNA vaccine inventor Dr. Robert Malone joined Tucker Carlson on Wednesday night after pro-CCP YouTube deleted his video on the dangers and risks of the mRNA vaccine that the US government is currently promoting to children. The WHO now says that children should not take […]
U.S. government shields vaccine makers from liability. A Nevada high school senior Emma Burkey received the one-shot Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine April 1. Within two weeks she was placed in an induced coma. Emma Burkey She underwent three brain surgeries after experiencing seizures and developing blood clots in her brain. Burkey was first treated at […]
EWR comment: It’s been pointed out that the original headline (which I’ve taken the liberty to change) is erring on the extreme side as Mike Adams’ headlines tend to do. Still as per my posts for the 10th July it is becoming more evident here in NZ that ‘they’ (ie the govt) do intend for us all to be jabbed. Even although they said right at the start it would never be mandatory (the CV jab ie) we know that the way the global govt people move is incrementally. Thin end of the wedge scenario. So now we have obviously gone from no mandatory to the frequent reminders we all need the jab and schools are next with an ever diminishing age range. (Thing is it is not protecting people from CV anyway, admitted by the establishment). So in fairness to the headline being extreme, be aware of the machinations of your govt people. Anybody looking deeper than MSM will acknowledge now the plot is looking somewhat sinister at the least.
Please do watch this excellent video on topic for Kiwis:
Robin Spring Saunders reportedly died after taking the vaccine required by her place of work.It is not known whether Robin received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
A Maryland healthcare worker who had just accepted a job with the prestigious John Hopkins Hospital reportedly died after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine required for employment.
Appearing skeptical, 45-year-old mom Robin Spring Saunders wrote on social media that she received her first jab on June 21 and that it was mandated by her place of work.
“I never thought I’d get a Covid shot but I got my first one today,” a post from Saunders stated. “Unfortunately my job requires it.”
In a Facebook update, Robin’s mom asked for prayers for her daughter after she suffered a reaction to the vaccine and was in the hospital ICU.
“John Hopkins told her she had to have the shot to start her…
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has spent nearly US$6 billion over the past 17 years trying to improve agriculture, mainly in Africa. This is a lot of money for an underfunded sector, and, as such, carries great weight. To better understand how the Gates Foundation is shaping the global agriculture agenda, GRAIN analysed all the food and agriculture grants the foundation has made up until 2020.
We found that, while the Foundation’s grants focus on African farmers, the vast majority of its funding goes to groups in North America and Europe. The grants are also heavily skewed to technologies developed by research centres and corporations in the North for poor farmers in the South, completely ignoring the knowledge, technologies and biodiversity that these farmers already possess.
Also, despite the Foundation’s focus on techno-fixes, much of its grants are given to groups that lobby on behalf of industrial farming and undermine alternatives. This is bad for African farmers and bad for the planet. It is time to pull the plug on the Gates’ outsized influence over global agriculture.
In 2014 GRAIN published a detailed breakdown of the grants made by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to promote agricultural development in Africa and other parts of the world.1 Our main conclusion then was that the vast majority of those grants were channelled to groups in the US and Europe, not Africa nor other parts of the global South. The funding overwhelmingly went to research institutes rather than farmers. They were also mainly directed at shaping policies to support industrial farming, not smallholders.
June 11, 2021, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology,Dr. Robert Malone, spoke out on the DarkHorse podcast about the potential dangers of COVID-19 gene therapyinjections, hosted by Bret Weinstein, Ph.D. The podcast was quickly erased from YouTube and Weinstein was issued a warning.
How’s this for ‘conspiracy theory’?The inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, after speaking out against misuse of the COVID-19 vaccines and the lack of critical testing, has been erased from YouTube and is having his online bio in place like Wikipedia being rapidly rewritten to show that he was not the inventor! That should tell you everything you need to know about the true nature of the this horrific campaign to vaccinate the whole world with an unproven and untested mRNA vaccine.
“So they poured outfor the mento eat.And it came to pass, as they were eatingof the pottage,that they cried out,and said,Othoumanof…
As soon as the subsidies for wind and solar dry up, so does the investment in generating capacity, proving the point that neither wind nor solar can survive for very long without guaranteed, government-mandated support; whether in the form of Production Tax Credits, Renewable Energy Certificates or penalties and fines laid on retailers if they do not purchase sufficient quantities of unreliable wind and solar to satisfy their obligations under renewable energy targets.
William Murray tells the tale by tapping into the superhero meme.
Wanna Live Forever? Become an Energy Tax Credit; They Can?t Seem to Die
C3 Solutions
William Murray
14 June 2021
Renewable energy tax credits are either the superheroes or the vampires of energy policy. They simply can?t die. At this rate, they deserve a comic book series of their own. Five times in the past two decades, wind and solar tax credits were ready to expire…
Norway has just passed a law making it illegal to criticize the LGBTQI movement in the privacy of one’s own home. Labeling it as ‘hate speech’ the Norwegian Parliament has established heavy fines and up to one year in jail for anyone found to have expressed opinions that are critical of the LGBTQI movement, even within the confines of their own private residence!
How the government will discover such ‘subversive’ and ‘politically incorrect’ speech is a matter of conjecture – presumable via disgruntled family members or friends who overhear them and report them to the police. The new law further stipulates that a person who is caught expressing anti-LGBTQI sentiment outside their home, even in private conversation, can be jailed for up to three years.
Norway has become the leading advocate for the LGBTQI movement within Europe over recent years and this new legislation further undermines the rights of free…
Attorney Molly McCann writes about how large, internet, social media companies are enforcing foreign speech laws across the board in The Big Tech Occupation.
Big Tech has infiltrated the American homeland and is imposing speech laws that resemble those of Europe, challenging the authority and longevity of the First Amendment. Although we share common ideals with other Western nations, we pursue and defend those ideals very differently. Nowhere is this more apparent than in our approach to speech.
It is important to understand how fundamentally different our country is from the rest of the world if we want to understand why Big Tech’s speech codes shout not be inflicted on American citizens in American jurisdictions. Put another way, if the would-be monarchs of Silicon Valley get their way, their speech codes will ultimately undermine our American values of free speech and the First Amendment itself.
“The toxicity of graphene oxide is reason enough to stop the global vaccination program.”
Amen to that; and, as we push for an immediate end to those injections, because of their high graphene oxide content, we also need to spread the word that those paper masks are also treated with graphene—a fact that made some few headlines in April, when Health Canada banned the wearing of such masks in schools and daycare facilities throughout Quebec. Here are two detailed pieces on the dangers of graphene inhalation: https://www.aier.org/article/the-dangers-of-masks/ https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/
So there’s graphene in those “vaccines” that many millions have been led to think will save them from COVID-19, and there’s also graphene on the masks that many millions have been wearing for months and months, thinking that such self-suffocation will protect them from COVID-19; and there’s also graphene on the PCR swabs that have been shoved up many millions of tense noses, ostensibly to test for COVID-19. Check out this (fittingly) breathless item from Graphene-info.com: https://www.graphene-info.com/new-graphene-biosensor-can-detect-sars-cov-2-under-minute
Thus COVID-19 World is all about graphene—a toxin that itself causes the symptoms of both COVID-19 and the “vaccination” injuries that “our free press” is laboring to conceal.
I suggest that we think long (but not too long) and hard about all this—and that we do so while each sipping pine needle tea, which, as Celia Farber reminds us here, is a widely available antidote to what They’re (literally) banking on injecting into every single one of us.
KHUSHAB, PUNJAB — A police superintendent is dead in what may be the fastest death we’ve covered on this blog.
Mr. Malik Imtiaz Mahmood was the Superintendent of Police for the city of Khushab. He received his experimental injection against COVID-19 on or around June 13, according to the World Doctors Alliance. The organization shared a photo of Mr. Mahmood receiving the injection.
Read more below (video included as the superintendent collapses):
I have seen similar videos… timber for instance being stockpiled in lumber yards, filmed by local observers. Creating shortages artificially. Ice Age Farmer at YT (if still there) documents this practice…a crime. Watch at the link:
“Let’s face it – there is no way our small blog can report on every event related to COVID dystopia. We didn’t even have time in this article to write about California McDonald’s restaurants now offering vaccinations. Some locations are offering a free Big Mac right after you get the experimental “McVaccine” in their super-clean, sanitary dining rooms. Of course the Centers for Disease Control admitted long ago that nearly 80% of COVID-19 hospitalizations are overweight and obese people.
Regardless, in our efforts to keep you up-to-date on all the latest happenings, we do one of these summary articles every month. Here are seven stories that were suppressed and/or censored by mainstream media and big tech in June.
This week’s number of total adverse events for all age groups following COVID vaccines surpassed 400,000, according to data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date.
NZ’s Socialist PM Comrade Adern is toughening up on hate speech. Hand in glove with the latest fb clampdown (fb even censors Bible verses, seriously, my test try of the Lord’s Prayer got labeled fake news ages ago… what next is in store you wonder?) This article is from lamestream RNZ. If we had an honest, trustworthy government that wasn’t really a corporation this idea would be a good one. Unfortunately none of them can be trusted, neither blue nor green nor red. Very shortly I won’t even be allowed to say that. They have us fully in step with the Agenda 2030 globalist, one world government plan. The plan that most Kiwis still think is a conspiracy. EWR
“Hate speech will become a criminal offence and anyone convicted could face harsher punishment, under proposed legislative changes.”
Below is a fb screenshot of the testimony of the death of a relative (names removed):
A New Zealander from the South Island has had a serious adverse reaction to the experimental injection. I am summarizing their statement from fb here so as not to identify the person, but also to illustrate to you what is happening. To alert you to possible adverse events that our NZ Doctors are not allowed to tell us. (The FDA lists a very different group of possible outcomes to those listed on NZ’s health website. Info below with links).
The jab in this instance required an ambulance to be called the following day as the patient was experiencing dizziness, shortness of breath, nausea, diarrhea, fever, confusion, loss of appetite, stomach pain, weakness & shaking and fatigue.
A high temperature, nearly 40.
Drips and pain medication were administered in hospital. Heart rate erratic. Five hours to come reasonably right and still not fully okay.
The patient’s been told by the health authority that if they don’t get the second shot they will get hit badly if they get CV and deny that the adverse reaction had anything to do with the VX.
IMPORTANT INFO: About the covid-19 jab, consider the following info not provided by the NZ govt:
KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION
This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):
You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.
CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED: (links to reporting sites below)
USA: DEATHS – 4,863 INJURIES: 262,521 (to June 24 )
UK: 1,295 DEATHS – INJURIES 922,596 (to June 10th)
EUROPE: 13,867 – INJURIES 1,354,336 (to June 5th)
AUSTRALIA – 210 DEATHS – 22031 INJURIES (to 27 May)
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
U.S. soldiers administer COVD-19 vaccines at Fort Hood, Texas, Feb. 20, 2021. (U.S. Army photo/Staff Sgt. Daniel Herman)
The Army has directed commands to prepare to administer mandatory COVID-19 vaccines as early as Sept. 1, pending full Food and Drug Administration licensure, Army Times has learned.
The directive came from an execute order sent to the force by Department of the Army Headquarters.
Army Times obtained a portion of a recent update to HQDA EXORD 225-21, COVID-19 Steady State Operations.
“Commanders will continue COVID-19 vaccination operations and prepare for a directive to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for service members [on or around] 01 September 2021, pending full FDA licensure,” the order said. “Commands will be prepared to provide a backbrief on servicemember vaccination status and way ahead for completion once the vaccine is mandated.”
EXORDS are utilized when the president directs the defense secretary to execute a military operation.
“As a matter of policy we do not comment on leaked documents. The vaccine continues to be voluntary,” said Maj. Jackie Wren, an Army spokesperson. “If we are directed by DoD to change our posture, we are prepared to do so.”
The Pentagon has not put out any guidance to the services to prepare for a mandatory vaccine roll-out in September, a defense official separately told Army Times.
It was not immediately clear whether the vaccines would even be approved in time for a Sept. 1 mandatory rollout. And an FDA spokesperson did not have an exact timeline available.
The ”timelines for vaccine approval may vary depending on a number of factors, but as Pfizerand Moderna announced, they have initiated rolling submissions of their biologics license applications for their COVID-19 vaccines,” said Alison Hunt, an FDA spokesperson. “As a general matter, FDA cannot comment on particular applications.”
Once the companies finish collecting biologics license application data on their vaccines, the FDA will take 60 days to review the applications for full approval, in accordance with the agency’s guidelines for priority review.
The Army currently has around 70 percent of its force vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to Army Lt. Gen. Ronald Place, director of the Defense Health Agency.
However, demand for the vaccine has fallen off in recent months across the military, roughly following a similar drop in demand among the American people.
The Veterans Affairs administration is currently weighing a plan to require all VA staffers to receive the vaccine, amid growing worry worldwide about the more severe Delta variant of the virus.
The Navy also recently told sailors to expect a mandatory vaccination program despite having the highest vaccine acceptance rate thus far.
Military Times Pentagon bureau chief Meghann Myers contributed to this report.
EWR note: I have just spent at least 20 minutes trying to edit another post… everything all over the place. I note also that the fb share icon has disappeared again as it frequently does these days. (The one that numbers shares)…. Below is info I’ve gathered from a post documented on fb FYI. Consider the info available given MDs have been largely silenced from giving you any fuller picture of possible outcomes, other than ‘safe & effective’.
Here sadly is the testimony of a young father. Remember what happens to this man as you ponder: there’s little in the various rhetoric & reports to assure that they have your back. We’ve seen denial of any connection between the jab & the adverse event, and frequently, denial of (or inability to even find) treatment. Do please consider his Go Fund Me plea. Remember the Pharma corporations have complete freedom from liability for their ‘safe & effective’ jabs. EWR
Immediate reaction to the Moderna Covid vaccine
“On May 25, 2021 Freddy suffered an immediate and severe reaction to his Moderna COVID vaccination. Within the 15 minute waiting period the left side of his body was paralyzed, he went cold, and his breathing became extremely shallow. He had swelling in his feet and a rash throughout his body. Freddy was treated immediately on site by paramedics. The following night he experienced dizziness and heart palpitations, collapsed in his home and stopped breathing. Freddy’s heart went into major atrial fibrillation and he was transported back to the hospital where a loop recorder was implanted into his chest to monitor his heart. Since then he has had six seizures and/or strokes (to be determined), experiences constant uncontrollable spasms and tremors, migraines, tinnitus, fatigue, dizziness, brain fog, and overall body pain. Freddy is a self-employed roof contractor with two children, aged 10 and 14. He is unable to work or drive, and has difficulty walking. Since his injury he has been unable to receive proper medical care in his home town, and has been dismissed and ignored by various health care providers. He is in need of many exams, test, scans, bloodwork, and to find a medical team willing to treat him. This is very likely to include travel and various other expenses. Freddy is in need of support from his community and fellow humans to assist with these impending costs, and to care for his family.”
If you care to you can see his adverse reaction at the link:
While the list of crimes committed by authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic is a long one, perhaps the biggest crime of all is the purposeful suppression of safe and effective treatments, including ivermectin. This appears to have been done to protect the COVID “vaccine” program
The COVID shots were brought to market under emergency use authorization (EUA), which can only be obtained if there are no other safe and effective alternatives available
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies looked at ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. A rapid review performed on behalf of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) in the U.S., January 3, 2021, found the drug “probably reduces deaths by an average 83% compared to no ivermectin treatment”
According to a more recent review and meta-analysis, ivermectin, when used preventatively, reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%
Another recent scientific review concluded ivermectin produces large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance
While the list of crimes committed by authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic is a long one, perhaps the biggest crime of all is the purposeful suppression of safe and effective treatments. At this point, it seems quite clear that this was done to protect the COVID jab rollout.
The COVID shots were brought to market under emergency use authorization (EUA), which can only be obtained if there are no other alternatives available. In a sane world, the COVID gene therapies would never have gotten an EUA, as there are several safe and effective treatment options available.
One treatment that stands out above the others is ivermectin, a decades-old antiparasitic drug that is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medications.
What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary. It’s been shown to significantly inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro,1 speed up viral clearance and dramatically reduce the risk of death.
Gold Standard Review Supports Use of Ivermectin
Dr. Tess Lawrie, a medical doctor, Ph.D., researcher and director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd (video above).2 in the U.K., has been trying to get the word out about ivermectin. To that end, she helped organize the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel3 and the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference,4 which was held online, April 24, 2021.
Twelve medical experts5 from around the world shared their knowledge during this conference, reviewing mechanism of action, protocols for prevention and treatment, including so-called long-hauler syndrome, research findings and real world data. All of the lectures, which were recorded via Zoom, can be viewed on Bird-Group.org.6
Lawrie has published several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies looking at ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. A rapid review performed on behalf of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) in the U.S., January 3, 2021, found the drug “probably reduces deaths by an average 83% compared to no ivermectin treatment.”7
Her February 2021 meta-analysis, which included 13 studies, found a 68% reduction in deaths. This is an underestimation of the beneficial effect, because one of the studies included used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the control arm. Since HCQ is an active treatment that has also been shown to have a positive impact on outcomes, it’s not surprising that this particular study did not rate ivermectin as better than the control treatment (which was HCQ).
Two months later, March 31, 2021, Lawrie published an updated analysis that included two additional randomized controlled trials. This time, the mortality reduction was 62%. When four studies with high risk of bias were removed during a subsequent sensitivity analysis, they ended up with a 72% reduction in deaths.
(Sensitivity analyses are done to double-check and verify results. Since the sensitivity analysis rendered an even better result, it confirms the initial finding. In other words, ivermectin is unlikely to reduce mortality by anything less than 62%.)
Lawrie reviewed the February and March analyses and other meta-analyses in an interview with Dr. John Campbell, featured in “More Good News on Ivermectin.” Lawrie has now published her third systematic review. According to this paper, published June 17, 2021 in the American Journal of Therapeutics:8
“Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared to no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38 …) … Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% … Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence.
Low-certainly evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for ‘need for mechanical ventilation,’ whereas effect estimates for ‘improvement’ and ‘deterioration’ clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials …”
World Health Organization Refuses to Recommend Ivermectin
Despite the fact that most of the evidence favors ivermectin, when the WHO finally updated its guidance on ivermectin at the end of March 2021,9,10 they largely rejected it, saying more data are needed. They only recommend it for patients who are enrolled in a clinical trial.
Yet, they based their negative recommendation on a review that included just five studies, which still ended up showing a 72% reduction in deaths. What’s more, in the WHO’s summary of findings, they suddenly include data from seven studies, which combined show an 81% reduction in deaths. The confidence interval is also surprisingly high, with a 64% reduction in deaths on the low end, and 91% on the high end.
Even more remarkable, their absolute effect estimate for standard of care is 70 deaths per 1,000, compared to just 14 deaths per 1,000 when treating with ivermectin. That’s a reduction in deaths of 56 per 1,000 when using the drug. The confidence interval is between 44 and 63 fewer deaths per 1,000.
Despite that, the WHO refuses to recommend this drug for COVID-19. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, a WHO representative to the Philippines, commented that using ivermectin without “strong” evidence is “harmful” because it can give “false confidence” to the public.11
Why Ivermectin Has Been Censored
If you’ve been trying to share the good news about ivermectin, you’re undoubtedly noticed that doing so is incredibly difficult. Many social media companies are banning such posts outright.
Promoting ivermectin on YouTube, or even discussing benefits cited in published research, violates the platform’s posting policies. DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., is but one of the victims of this censorship policy.
His interviews with medical and scientific experts such as Dr. Pierre Kory, a lung and ICU specialist, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and the president and chief medical officer12 of the FLCCC, and Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,13 have been deleted from the platform. The interview with Malone had more than 587,330 views by the time it was wiped from YouTube.14
But why? Why don’t they want people to feel confident that there’s treatment out there and that COVID-19 is not the death sentence they’ve been led to believe it is? The short answer is because ivermectin threatens the vaccine program. As explained by Andrew Bannister in a May 12, 2021, Biz News article:15
“What if there was a cheap drug, so old its patent had expired, so safe that it’s on the WHO’s lists of Essential and Children’s Medicines, and used in mass drug administration rollouts?
What if it can be taken at home with the first signs COVID symptoms, given to those in close contact, and significantly reduce COVID disease progression and cases, and far fewer few people would need hospitalization?
The international vaccine rollout under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) would legally have to be halted. For an EUA to be legal, ‘there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing or treating the disease or condition.’
The vaccines would only become legal once they passed level 4 trials and that certainly won’t happen in 2021 … The vaccine rollout, outside of trials, would become illegal.
The vaccine manufactures, having spent hundreds of million dollars developing and testing vaccines during a pandemic, would not see the $100bn they were expecting in 2021 … Allowing any existing drug, at this time, well into stage 3 trials, to challenge the legality of the EUA of vaccines, is not going to happen easily.”
The WHO and Drug Companies Are Severely Compromised
The WHO’s rejection of ivermectin only makes sense if a) you take into account the EUA requirements; and b) remember that the WHO receives a significant portion of its funding from private vaccine interests.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of the WHO after the United States, and The GAVI Alliance, also owned by Gates, is the fourth largest donor. The GAVI Alliance exists solely to promote and profit from vaccines, and for several years, the WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, served on the GAVI board of directors.16
As reported by Bannister, Merck, the original patent holder of ivermectin, also has severe conflicts of interest that appear to have played a role in the rejection of ivermectin. He writes:17
“Ivermectin has been used in humans for 35 years and over 4 billion doses have been administered. Merck, the original patent holder,18 donated 3.7 billion doses to developing countries … Its safety is documented at doses twenty times the normal …
Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996 and they produce less than 5% of global supply. In 2020 they were asked to assist in Nigerian and Japanese trials but declined both.
In 2021 Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against Covid-19 and bizarrely claimed, ‘A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies’ of the drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts, by primary care workers, in mass campaigns, to millions in developing countries.
The media reported the Merck statement as a blinding truth without looking at the conflict of interests when days later, Merck received $356m from the US government to develop an investigational therapeutic.
The WHO even quoted Merck, as evidence, that it didn’t work, in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin. It’s a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy.”
FLCCC Calls for Widespread and Early Use of Ivermectin
In the U.S., the FLCCC has been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19,19,20 and Kory has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 202021 and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in January 2021.22
Based on a meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, ivermectin produces large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.
As noted by the FLCCC:23
“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.
… numerous clinical studies — including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials — showed large magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early treatment and also in late-stage disease. Taken together … dozens of clinical trials that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assess clinical efficacy.”
The FLCCC has published three different COVID-19 protocols, all of which include the use of ivermectin:
I-MASK+24 — a prevention and early at-home treatment protocol
I-MATH+25 — an in-hospital treatment protocol. The clinical and scientific rationale for this protocol has been peer-reviewed and was published in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine26 in mid-December 2020
I-RECOVER27 — a long-term management protocol for long-haul syndrome
In addition to Lawrie’s meta-analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the FLCCC has also published a scientific review28 in that same journal.
This paper, “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19,” published in the May/June 2021 issue, found that, based on a meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, ivermectin produces “large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.”
Ivermectin Significantly Reduces Infection Risk and Death
The FLCCC also found that when used as a preventive, ivermectin “significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19.” In one study, of those given a dose of 0.4 mg per kilo on Day 1 and a second dose on Day 7, only 2% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, compared to 10% of controls who did not get the drug.
In another, family members of patients who had tested positive were given two doses of 0.25 mg/kg, 72 hours apart. At follow up two weeks later, only 7.4% of the exposed family members who took ivermectin tested positive, compared to 58.4% of those who did not take ivermectin.
In a third, which unfortunately was unblended, the difference between the two groups was even greater. Only 6.7% of the ivermectin group tested positive compared to 73.3% of controls. According to the FLCCC, “the difference between the two groups was so large and similar to the other prophylaxis trial results that confounders alone are unlikely to explain such a result.”
The FLCCC also points out that ivermectin distribution campaigns have resulted in “rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality,” which indicate that ivermectin is “effective in all phases of COVID-19.” For example, in Brazil, three regions distributed ivermectin to its residents, while at least six others did not. The difference in average weekly deaths is stark.
In Santa Catarina, average weekly deaths declined by 36% after two weeks of ivermectin distribution, whereas two neighboring regions in the South saw declines of just 3% and 5%. Amapa in the North saw a 75% decline, while the Amazonas had a 42% decline and Para saw an increase of 13%.
It’s worth noting that ivermectin’s effectiveness appears largely unaffected by variants, meaning it has worked on any and all variants that have so far popped up around the world. Additional evidence for ivermectin will hopefully come from the British PRINCIPLE trial,29 which began June 23, 2021. Ivermectin will be evaluated as an outpatient treatment in this study, which will be the largest clinical trial to date.
Ivermectin in the Treatment of Long-Haul Syndrome
The FLCCC believes ivermectin may also be an important treatment adjunct for long-haul COVID syndrome. In their June 16, 2021, video update, the team reviewed the newly released I-RECOVER protocol.
Keep in mind that ivermectin is not to be used in isolation. Corticosteroids, for example, are often a crucial treatment component when organizing pneumonia-related lung damage is present. Vitamin C is also important to combat inflammation. Be sure to work with your doctor to identify the right combination of drugs and supplements for you.
Last but not least, as noted by Kory in this video, it’s really important to realize that long-haul syndrome is entirely preventable. The key is early treatment when you develop symptoms of COVID-19.
While ivermectin has a good track record when it comes to prevention and early treatment, it can be tricky to obtain, depending on where you live and who your doctor is.
A highly effective alternative that anyone can use, anywhere, is nebulized hydrogen peroxide. It’s extremely safe and very inexpensive. The biggest cost is the one-time purchase of a good tabletop jet nebulizer. To learn more, download Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery,” in which he details how to use this treatment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.