Renowned microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi has issued a stark warning about the devastating health consequences of Covid “vaccines,” declaring that the injections are shortening he lifespan of those who received them.
Dr. Bhakdi warns that mRNA shots are the leading cause of the global surge in cases of myocarditis, a deadly form of heart inflammation.
Bhakdi asserts that the vaccines are responsible for clinically diagnosed myocarditis in “at least one to two percent” of recipients.
While the number may sound small, the figure translates to millions of cases across populations.
In a chilling message, Bhakdi sounds the alarm to warn the public that mRNA injections “shorten the life of human beings.”
He emphasized that no case of vaccine-induced myocarditis should ever be considered minor, stressing:
“You must not shorten the life of a human being.”
Far from being a rare or trivial side effect, Dr. Bhakdi warns that each instance of myocarditis following vaccination is life-threatening and should be treated with the utmost seriousness.
The veteran scientist also issued a blistering rebuke of medical professionals who continue to downplay or deny the risks.
“Immediately… excluded, not allowed to be a doctor anymore,” he said of those who dismiss the role of the “vaccines” in myocarditis.
Perhaps most alarmingly, Dr. Bhakdi claims the evidence is so scientifically conclusive that any diagnosed case of myocarditis after vaccination could serve as legal proof of causation.
This important data was heavily censored at the roll out, preventing you from making a truly informed decision. It’s not medical advice, it’s just putting out there for you, the respective and differing medical points of view that we have been served up EWNZ
Here are those supplied by the authorities in NZ:
The most common reported reactions are:
pain or swelling at the injection site
feeling tired or fatigued
headache
muscle aches
chills
joint pain
fever
redness at the injection site
nausea.
Uncommon side effects
In the clinical trials, uncommon side effects were reported in every 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 people. These include:
You are advised that you aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the treatment. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.
Remember only 1% on average are reporting adverse events.
It is tempting to think of evil in apocalyptic imagery: vast and sudden demolition, a searing propulsive darkness or a blinding conflagration, the work of engineered catastrophic mayhem, in whose wake is utter smouldering demise. Yet the work of evil is often piecemeal, steady, methodical, and the accomplishment of a great wrong may well be the result of the gradual accumulative weight of small decisions, whose progress is all the surer for its studied implacability. I think of a large battalion of infantry moving painstakingly across a terrain and claiming it inch by inch until they have vanquished all. Yet, in truth, evil is varied, its manifestations as many as there are living human entities who, faced with seemingly slight or casual choices, often land on the side of self-interest, self-aggrandizement and deception. And evil, however disguised, appears in language.
NewZealandDoc’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
You will forgive me this preface as I alight on a matter that demonstrates with simple clarity a facet of the evil that has been visited upon us during the Corona War by an institution purporting to have as its charge the protection of the public weal in its regulation of medical practitioners: the infamous Medical Council of New Zealand.
On 5 December 2019, while in the employ as a psychiatrist of one of New Zealand’s District Health Boards (since amalgamated into an overarching bureaucratic entity now known as Te Whatu Ora), I received an email communication about informed consent. The document can be perused in its entirety here:
The “Updated statement on informed consent,” signed by Chief Executive Officer Joan Simeon –now, coincidentally enough, the Chair of the Federation of State Medical Board’s international arm, the International Association of Medical Regulatory Agencies – states the following:
“The key points about informed consent are:
•Every time treatment is provided, a doctor must have permission to provide that treatment. The process of obtaining that permission is called ‘informed consent’. Without informed consent, the treatment may be unlawful. To help the patient decide whether they want a treatment, they first need to be given information, such as the risks and benefits of their treatment options.
•Obtaining consent is a process of shared decision-making where a doctor helps the patient understand their medical condition and the options for treating (or not treating) that condition. It is more than signing forms and completing paperwork. As a doctor, you need to take the time to ask questions so that you understand what matters to your patient, and what their concerns, wishes, goals and values are.”
Bear in mind that this statement, meant to be a standard of good medical practice and to be used as a measure of professional conduct, appeared just as covid had been unleashed upon the world.
Then, on 28 April 2021, this very same Medical Council, in conjunction with the Dental Council, issued a guidance statement on professional responsibility and the Covid-19 vaccine (so-called), which can be found here. It was withdrawn without fanfare on 13 September 2023. It is a masterpiece of obfuscation and an inversion of true informed consent. As such, it represents one of those unheralded but highly effective acts of evil.
Guidance Statement Covid 19 Vaccine And Your Professional Responsibility
Not only are health practitioners themselves expected to get the jab, but the regulators write that “it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of antivaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners,” while simultaneously advising that “As a health practitioner, you have a role in providing evidence-based advice and information about the COVID-19 vaccination to others. You should be prepared to discuss evidence-based information about vaccination and its benefits to assist informed decision making.”
Yet when one of my colleagues undertook to provide advice to a pregnant woman about medical issues connected with the use of the Pfizer inoculation, his licence was suspended. Furthermore, given the provisional approval of the inoculation at the time and the absence of long-term safety data, the much-vaunted informed consent process and the collaborative partnership with patients implied necessitated a frank discussion of serious risk – risk that has, sadly enough, been borne out not only in New Zealand but world-wide, with an extraordinary panoply of adverse events, including death, amounting to a genocide.
With every day each of us is confronted by choice, on matters small or large. However mauled we may or may not be by spike proteins, jabs, hippocampal lesions, or the weight of the massive psychological operation played against us with covid, we retain the freedom to choose. During the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany – in an era far before viral or vaccine-mediated bioweapons were in play – ordinary people made choices, bureaucrats made choices, neighbors made choices, and a tremendous evil was allowed to grow to a horrific immensity.
Undermining a real, a true, a genuine foundational principle of Medicine – informed consent – in the service of … of following an agenda that has oppressed and is still oppressing us and destroying viable and decent Medicine in the process, is but another one of those examples of how evil wins its way in our world. The Medical Council of New Zealand, ostensible protector of public health, has in its serpentine and devious manner, shown us that it is as destructive as it is hypocritical, and as corrupt as it is authoritarian.
And those many doctors out there who knew then and now know even better about their profession need to come out of hiding, no matter how uneasy or fearful of the “authorities” they may feel.
Unless they do so a medical profession worth keeping won’t be left.
More stunning silences from Lamestream and governments all … still think it’s safe & effective? …. Highly recommend you sub to MCM (link below) for regular updates on how the celebrities (many of whom helped push the experimental treatment) are faring … not too well going by reports …EWNZ
Alyssa Farah Griffin missing from “The View”; Stevante Clark has a “mild heart attack”; Cavaliers running back Perris Jones “carted off field after terrifying injury”
Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak was rushed to a hospital in Mexico City after he reported “feeling strange” during the delivery of a speech, Mexican media outlets reported.
Mr Wozniak, who exited from Apple in 1985, was hospitalised possibly due to a stroke, Mexico’s Reforma newspaper said.
“Tiny Pretty Things” Actor Barton Cowperthwaite Diagnosed with Brain Tumor
November 11, 2023
Tiny Pretty Things star Barton Cowperthwaite has been diagnosed with stage 2 brain cancer.
The 31-year-old actor and ballet dancer revealed on Instagram that he had been diagnosed with “at least a stage 2 glioma” but noted that the “fairly decent-sized brain tumor” has not spread to anywhere else in his body.
Brooke Shields had a seizure; Mark Chesnutt, Zombies cancel shows; Bret Michaels’ “cancer scare”; Bridgette Sampras has ovarian cancer; voice actor James Cathcart’s “cancer battle”
“Top Marine general hospitalized” (why?); KC Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes “has an illness”; VA Tech’s Gabriel Williams rushed to hospital; Alan Ruck drives into pizzeria; Clea Shearer is now “cancer-free”
In this article, we explore the implications of the Therapeutic Products Legislation for New Zealand, from a GE and GMO perspective, and why it’s critical that NZ First is part of the next government to protect our future.
The Therapeutic Products Legislation threatens to open the floodgates for the fast-tracking of hundreds of mRNA drugs.
A new drug may take as long as 10 years of research, including safety trials, at a cost of a billion dollars, and the majority never make it to market.
The experience with the COVID mRNA is that this technology is far from healthy and definitely far from safe.
I’ll explain what you can do about this.
Introduction
In the hearts of many New Zealanders lies a shared aspiration: to see their country thrive as a global leader in organic agriculture, a GE-Free haven producing top-quality goods.
However, hidden amidst the Therapeutic Products Legislation lurks a growing fear: could this law pave the way for rapid and widespread genetic engineering, compromising our dreams? Is the true purpose of this legislation for the fast-tracking of dugs that will never survive the rigours of clinical trials?
The Trojan Horse of Genetic Engineering
The concern is palpable. The legislation seems to pave the way for wholesale genetic engineering, including mRNA treatments for plants, animals, and humans, through the backdoor. If this is true, it signals a bleak future, where New Zealand’s identity is tethered to commodity industries, forever competing on low price rather than quality.
Moreover, recent experiences with COVID mRNA vaccines underscore the potential hazards of this technology. Yet, the legislation could open the floodgates for a rush of mRNA drugs and GMOs with insufficient safety checks. Here’s why:
2 elephants; 2 giraffes; a chimpanzee; a black rhino; a koala cub; a sloth; a squirrel monkey; 5 meerkats; a fox; a deer; a python; a lemur; a Golden Eagle; a sea lion, a cheetah; and 4 lion cubs
NZ DOCTORS OPEN LETTER OF CONCERN Letter by NZ Doctors with Concerns Over Pfizer Vaccine April 27, 2021OPEN LETTER BY NZ MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS …… SHARING CONCERNS ABOUT PFIZER ‘COMIRNATY’ INVESTIGATIONAL VACCINE FOR COVID-19
We write formally to express our shared concern that: A new prescription only medicine with s23(1) provisional approval, which legally can only be for the treatment of a limited number of patients, is being promoted for the entire adult population of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Medsafe asked 58 questions, but the answers for most of these are not due until March to July 2021. The clinical trials will not be completed until 2023. Nobody currently knows how safe or effective this novel mRNA technology is in the medium to long term, but highly credible medical experts around the world, and even some vaccine developers themselves, are predicting problems and raising urgent red-flag concerns. If any safety issues are identified in the remaining period of the trials the effects could be catastrophic for our community or a proportion that have already received the vaccine. The signatories are mindful of their obligations to discuss risks, benefits and uncertainties of any treatment and to ensure informed consent of all patients before giving any treatment and of the other important obligations under the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers Rights. Our insurers have affirmed this obligation. Compelling patients or workers to receive drug, medicine or vaccine which is still investigational would set a significant medical precedent, which would run counter to all international codes of medical ethics since the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and Declaration of Helsinki in 1952. The fundamental tenets of these include complete disclosure of the risks and unknowns to the participants in medical experiments; the obligations on the experimenter for care and after-care of adverse outcomes; and the freedom from coercion, stand over tactics and over-reach. This would seem to include threats of job loss, travel bans etc. Many patients feel pressured to accept this vaccine in the mistaken belief they may protect others due to representations in the media and/ or pressure from their employers, and that they may lose their employment or may be disadvantaged in their employment if they do not accept this experimental vaccine. The signatories are concerned to ensure that the Ministry of Health, College of GPs and the Medical Council of NZ are aware of the above concerns, and that they are addressed with urgency to ensure the way the vaccine is being promoted to healthy people who do not require treatment is both lawful and represents best practice. We are eager to clarify that any patients injured by the vaccine will have acknowledgement and cover from ACC. The signatories note that even the promoters of the vaccine do not claim that it prevents transmission and that public representations that the vaccine is effective for this purpose are misleading. We do not accept that lay vaccinators are qualified or competent to partake in the process of informed consent to patients re this vaccine, especially as they have no medical expertise and no prior knowledge of the individual circumstances of the patient or their health issues. Any risk benefit assessment and consideration of alternatives is complex and requires a considered consultation by a qualified practitioner.
Ref: Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Int J Clin Pract 2021:75e13795. Signed: NAMES AND MEDICAL COUNCIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS Matt Shelton 17031 Anne O’Reilly 23539 Anna Goodwin 48183 Paul Butler 10712 Caroline Wheeler 17374 Tracy Chapman 29070 Tessa Jones 08775 Ulrich Doering 16398 Aida Hasbun 70825 Adeline Lee 22765 Cindy De Villiers 20053 Damian Wojcik 10754 Rob Maunsell 08554 Wellington Tan 09716 Simon Thornley 23706 Fred M. Timmermans, MSC, Dental Surgeon (Picton),HPI no 18BRMD Rene de Monchy 08986 Mike Godfrey 07144 Samantha Bailey 40705 Emanuel E Garcia 40834 William J Reeder 07018 Sheetal Patel 27638 Graham H. Evans 36808 Tihomir Djordjic 23070 Matthius Seidel 32235 Elizabeth Harris 18284 Robin Kelly 10370 Reuben Tomlinson 40821 Anna Harvey 15766 Kate Armstrong 22941 Stephen Joe 11754 Fraser Burling 18908
A long succession of demos of the magnet sticking to the vax site in the arms… if you fast forward you will see readings of the sites on emf meters (elevated predictably for vxed versus unvxed) … and data on metallic taste in the mouth as a possible side effect. Make of it what you will. If nothing else I’m reminded of the metals found in vxes for years that folk have highlighted with their brain damaged babies … completely ignored of course or blamed for ‘maltreating’ their infants. They’ve also been filling our teeth with mercury for years and years ignoring that it’s a hazardous substance. No thanks.
to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon. Coupon code noforcedmeds 40% off, recurring discount! (limited time offer)
You must be logged in to post a comment.