VAERS has not published any “new” public reports since September 5, 2025. The regular routine has been the first Friday of month, which means they just blew by the second month in a row without a VAERS update. This is unprecedented for VAERS in any year and during any past governmental shutdown. You would think pharmacovigilance would be mission critical especially during one of the worst pandemics ever experienced in modern times. However, it makes total sense if this was a choreographed plandemic with a heavy dose of pharmacofraudulance. Come on man, just take your Ozempic and shut your pie hole! No soup for you, God Bless.
I confirm it looks like reports can still be submitted to VAERS, but I can not confirm if incoming reports are being adjudicated, authenticated, or “processed/finalized” in any way? This is the last available update:
” … vaccinated children showed 4.29 times higher rates of asthma, nearly six times higher rates of autoimmune disease, and 5.5 times higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. Most remarkably, among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD compared to 262 cases in the vaccinated group. “
“An Inconvenient Study” delivers a gripping piece of investigative journalism that will leave viewers questioning everything they thought they knew about vaccine safety research. When medical journalist Del Bigtree challenged Dr. Marcus Zervos of the prestigious Henry Ford Health System to conduct the most comprehensive vaccinated versus unvaccinated study ever undertaken, neither anticipated the explosive journey that would follow. The documentary’s hidden camera revelation—capturing Dr. Zervos admitting that publishing his completed study would end his career—provides one of the most stunning moments in recent documentary filmmaking. With over 18,000 subjects studied and shocking disparities found between vaccinated and unvaccinated children’s health outcomes, this film exposes what appears to be a deliberate suppression of critical public health data that every parent deserves to see.
Del Bigtree brings unique credibility to this investigation, having evolved from CBS medical journalist to becoming one of the most persistent voices demanding transparency in vaccine safety science. Through his nonprofit ICAN (Informed Consent Action Network), he’s successfully sued government agencies and uncovered the startling absence of proper placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines—victories that provide crucial context for understanding why the Henry Ford study matters so profoundly. The documentary skillfully weaves Bigtree’s personal journey with the larger narrative, showing how his production of the original “Vaxxed” documentary opened his eyes to thousands of parents reporting similar patterns of vaccine injury. His encounter with Colton, a 13-year-old paralyzed by the HPV vaccine who tragically took his own life in 2018, provides emotional weight that grounds the statistical arguments in human reality.
The relationship between Bigtree and Dr. Zervos forms the documentary’s compelling core, with Zervos emerging as a complex figure caught between scientific integrity and institutional pressure. His credentials—having solved the Flint water crisis and conducted controversial hydroxychloroquine research—establish him as someone willing to challenge orthodoxy when lives are at stake. The film’s presentation of the study’s findings is staggering: vaccinated children showed 4.29 times higher rates of asthma, nearly six times higher rates of autoimmune disease, and 5.5 times higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders. Most remarkably, among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD compared to 262 cases in the vaccinated group. When Zervos admits on hidden camera that he would publish the study “just how it is” if not for the current climate, calling the findings “important” while simultaneously refusing to publish out of career preservation fears, the documentary captures a scientist’s moral crisis in real-time.
The film’s methodological approach demonstrates sophisticated understanding of epidemiological research while remaining accessible to general audiences. Rather than simply dismissing potential criticisms, the documentary shows how the Henry Ford team conducted multiple sensitivity analyses, adjusting for follow-up time, healthcare-seeking behavior, and various confounders—yet the alarming disparities persisted. The visual presentation of data, particularly the graph showing that by age 10 only 43% of vaccinated children remained free from chronic health conditions compared to 83% of unvaccinated children, makes complex statistics immediately comprehensible. The film strengthens its case by contextualizing the Henry Ford study within other independent research, including Dr. Peter Aaby’s shocking findings from Guinea-Bissau where DTP-vaccinated children had five times higher mortality rates despite being protected from the target diseases.
The documentary’s investigative techniques create undeniable dramatic tension while raising important questions about scientific transparency. The decision to use hidden cameras, while controversial, proves justified when Zervos’s candid admissions reveal the gulf between private acknowledgment and public silence. The film effectively contrasts heart-wrenching parent testimonials—particularly the devastating account of triplets who simultaneously regressed after vaccination—with the cold institutional responses that dismiss their experiences. Attorney Aaron Siri’s deposition of vaccine luminary Dr. Stanley Plotkin provides another documentary highlight, with Plotkin admitting under oath that five-day safety trials cannot detect autoimmune or neurological conditions that develop after that window, essentially acknowledging that vaccine safety science rests on assumptions rather than data.
From a cinematographic perspective, “An Inconvenient Study” excels at building narrative tension through careful pacing and strategic reveals. The filmmakers wisely hold back the actual study results until after establishing the credibility of both Bigtree and Zervos, making the eventual revelations land with maximum impact. The hidden camera footage, while grainy, carries the authentic tension of genuine investigative journalism—this isn’t polished propaganda but raw documentation of a scientist’s confession. The film’s emotional range, from parents’ anguished testimonials to Bigtree’s visible frustration when Zervos refuses to publish, creates a human dimension that prevents the documentary from becoming merely a data presentation. The inclusion of the cease-and-desist letter from Henry Ford Health’s attorneys in the film’s conclusion adds a layer of institutional intimidation that reinforces the documentary’s central thesis about suppression.
“An Inconvenient Study” stands as essential viewing for anyone concerned about children’s health, scientific integrity, or institutional transparency. The documentary’s power lies not in telling viewers what to think but in exposing information that has been deliberately withheld, allowing audiences to draw their own conclusions. When Dr. Zervos states that “nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job,” he inadvertently explains why this study remained hidden and why Bigtree felt compelled to expose it through unconventional means. The film’s call for other institutions to replicate this research feels less like activism and more like basic scientific principle—if the Henry Ford study is flawed, prove it through replication, not suppression. For parents making health decisions for their children, medical professionals questioning orthodox positions, and citizens concerned about institutional capture of science, this documentary provides crucial information that has been systematically kept from public view. Its ultimate message—that parents deserve access to all safety data before making medical decisions for their children—should resonate regardless of one’s position on vaccines, making “An Inconvenient Study” one of the most important documentaries of our time.
“Injuries are 10–15 times higher … 30–50-year-olds are dropping dead… The victims fear backlash or can’t accept they were misled …The media and tech giants actively suppress these stories … “
Note: Barry Young, NZ data analyst also revealed shocking details he discovered in our data and was promptly shut down, vilified and silenced… take note Kiwis … it appears that the safe & effective is not & it is still being promoted (more links here) EWNZ
Wall Street Whistleblower Reveals Grim Truth Behind Rising Deaths of the Young and Fit
Edward Dowd, a veteran data analyst and ex-BlackRock executive, has just blown the lid off a terrifying trend: 5,000 people are dying every week, and the insurance industry knows why.
Linked directly to Covid mRNA ‘vaccines’, the spike in excess deaths is especially devastating among young adults.
Dowd says the silence is deadly, and the numbers are undeniable.
One of the world’s leading data experts has revealed that the insurance industry is now seeing up to 5,000 deaths every single week that are linked to Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The staggering death toll was disclosed by Edward Dowd, a renowned Wall Street data analyst.
Dowd dropped the bombshell during a recent interview on the Commodity Culture podcast.
While sounding the alarm about the discovery, Dowd revealed that the number of healthy young adults “dropping dead” has skyrocketed.
He also notes that “vaccine” injuries are now “10-15 times higher” than before the mass Covid “vaccination” campaign.
Worryingly, however, he says that “vaccine” injury victims and families of the dead are too afraid to speak out because they “fear backlash.”
Dowd argues that the reports on mRNA injection-related deaths and injuries are being shut down by Big Tech and the corporate media.
In the United States alone, Dowd revealed that insurance data shows “3,000–5,000 vaccine-linked deaths a week.”
“Injuries are 10–15 times higher,” he added.
“30–50-year-olds are dropping dead.
“The victims fear backlash or can’t accept they were misled.
“The media and tech giants actively suppress these stories,” he warns.
(click on the image belowto watch video at rumble.com)
Dowd, a former executive at the world’s largest investment firm, BlackRock, has been sounding the alarm about surging deaths among the Covid-vaxxed for some time.
He is considered one of America’s leading data experts.
Through his expert analysis of insurance industry data, Dowd has become a prominent figure in investigations into the impact of the global Covid “vaccination” campaign.
As Slay News previously reported, Dowd dropped a chilling warning in April after uncovering evidence showing that the number of excess deaths of working-age Americans is skyrocketing.
According to an alarming warning from Dowd, insurance industry data shows that excess deaths are soaring among people aged 18 to 64 years old.
These deaths started exploding after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021.
However, the deaths appear to show no signs of slowing down, despite the pandemic being long over and “vaccination” rates dropping off.
In January 2022, Life Insurance CEO Scott Davidson reported that death rates among working-aged people aged 18 to 64 were “up 40 percent over what they were pre-pandemic.”
He explained that a 40 percent spike in deaths was completely unprecedented.
Davidson compared a 10 percent rise in deaths to a once-in-200-year flood.
According to Dowd, excess deaths are now “off the charts.”
Davidson also noted that excess deaths that started surging in 2021 were non-Covid deaths.
(click on the image below to watch video at rumble.com)
Meanwhile, other highly vaccinated nations around the world are continuing to sound the alarm about surging deaths.
An explosive new alert has emerged from Singapore regarding the nation’s skyrocketing excess death rate among those who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The chilling data has raised serious questions about the true toll of the aggressive global Covid “vaccination” campaign.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that “excess deaths” are the number of deaths above what would be expected based on historical trends.
According to bombshell data from the Human Mortality Database (HMD) and peer-reviewed studies, the country experienced a sharp and sustained rise in excess deaths immediately following the rollout of Covid “vaccines.”
The spike is an ominous signal that the vaccines may have played a significant role in the surge of mortality.
The data paints a disturbing picture of a country that, despite being one of the most vaccinated in the world, is facing unprecedented levels of death.
In March 2022, excess mortality in Singapore spiked to an astonishing 49.9% above expected deaths.
The broader period between February and April 2022 saw an average of 24.0% higher deaths than usual.
Alarmingly, however, this wasn’t a temporary uptick.
Excess deaths have continued surging long after the pandemic.
As of December 2024, the most recent data reveals that excess deaths in Singapore have stabilized at approximately 25-30% above the historical baseline.
The data suggests that this elevated mortality rate has become the new normal for the fully “vaccinated” nation.
This important data was heavily censored at the roll out, preventing you from making a truly informed decision. It’s not medical advice, it’s just putting out there for you, the respective and differing medical points of view that we have been served up EWNZ
Here are those supplied by the authorities in NZ:
The most common reported reactions are:
pain or swelling at the injection site
feeling tired or fatigued
headache
muscle aches
chills
joint pain
fever
redness at the injection site
nausea.
Uncommon side effects
In the clinical trials, uncommon side effects were reported in every 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 people. These include:
You are advised that you aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the treatment. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.
Remember only 1% on average are reporting adverse events.
Whistleblower Barry Young provides his data on the young New Zealanders, aged 40 and under, who died between the nationwide rollout of the covid vaccination in 2021, and who were registered as having had at least one dose of Covid vaccination before November 2023. (Short Clip … Be sure to scroll down to the full video and do read the comments).
To the parents of the little ones listed there who were cut off from the tender age of 5 years old … my deep condolences. I can’t begin to imagine your grief.
Note to Ken at comments: if you genuinely wish to communicate with me please use the contact form.
Time series analysis of New Zealand data supports a relationship between mRNA vaccination and death that is consistent with a German autopsy study.
On 14th December 2022, Medsafe (NZ Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority) released its 46th report into the safety of Covid vaccines entitled “Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines”. The report covered safety signals up to 30th November 2022.
This report contained new advice about the risk of death following mRNA vaccination. Medsafe’s assessment began as follows:
“By chance, some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly. Therefore, part of our review process includes comparing natural death rates to observed death rates following vaccination, to determine if there are any specific trends or patterns that might indicate a vaccine safety concern.”
The report comes after months of speculation concerning record levels of excess all cause mortality in New Zealand affecting all ages, currently running at 15% above historical levels.
After dropping the bombshell news, Medsafe goes through an entirely bogus and unscientific process designed to reassure the public that there is nothing to worry about. Medsafe compares the number of deaths reported to CARM (Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring) within 21 days of vaccination to the background rate of deaths from natural causes. In doing so, it omits to mention (but does so elsewhere) that CARM reports are voluntary and massively underreported by an estimated factor of 20 times. As a result there is nothing at all reassuring about this safety report.
Are There Other Reasons to Be Concerned? Yes, Many:
1. Medsafe reports, “There have been no deaths reported for the Vaxzevria or Nuvaxovid vaccines.” So why are they happening after the Pfizer vaccine?
2. Autopsies are not routinely performed in New Zealand following deaths proximate to vaccination. A recently published German study Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination reports 16% of deaths within 20 days of mRNA vaccination exhibit definitive causal symptoms of acute myocarditis, a known adverse effect of Pfizer Covid vaccination. So why is there no concerted effort here in NZ to investigate by routinely performing autopsies?
3. The Ministry of Health has consistently refused/omitted to record vaccine status on death certificates or make CARM reporting mandatory. This makes it very difficult to scientifically and reliably investigate any causal relationship between mRNA vaccination and death or serious illness. On the 17th December 2021 the director of the Covid immunisation programme wrote to me on behalf of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health, saying “An accurate measurement of all adverse events is not required”.
In the light of today’s Medsafe admission, that’s damning. Incredibly Dr. Bloomfield has just been appointed the inaugural chair of a new public policy impact institute at the University of Auckland, proposing to translate and apply research into policies that directly impact communities—but he doesn’t subscribe to accuracy??? Most people do, especially academics.
4. Medsafe argues that temporal correlation between deaths and vaccination does not prove a causal relationship between them. They, along with epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker, suggest that Covid infection or pre-existing health conditions are more likely to be causally connected to deaths following vaccination. There are in fact other relevant analyses which can determine whether there is a relationship between mRNA vaccination and proximate deaths. Among these, powerful techniques of time series analysis can discover whether deaths are consistently occurring during specific intervals of time after vaccination. This would provide strong support for a causal relationship.
Among the world’s nations, New Zealand is in a unique position to undertake this sort of analysis. In 2021 New Zealand had very few Covid infections (almost none) but the majority of the population were vaccinated over a period of eight months. Therefore deaths recorded during much of 2021 in New Zealand cannot be ascribed to any effect of Covid infection.
Preliminary data from 2021 has been analysed to investigate the proposition that mRNA vaccination resulted in deaths. This shows there is a significant (p=0.045) relationship between number of vaccines administered by week and weekly deaths at a lag of one week. In other words, there is a statistically significant increased chance of dying within a few days of vaccination. Download the study here. Despite the preliminary nature of the data in this study, the findings of this study are consistent with the findings of German autopsies. Therefore there should be more rigorous study of stored data to further test these findings
There are other simple methods to analyse death data. For example taking the date of inoculation for each individual as a notional point in time around which all death data can be assessed for entire cohorts of individuals. This would reveal whether death rates before and after inoculation differ.
5. The time series analysis does not preclude the possibility that other deaths at longer time intervals after an inoculation date may be occurring as a result of mRNA vaccination. Unprecedented rates of all cause mortality suggest this is likely to be the case. Unfortunately, the New Zealand Ministry of Health is not releasing data on causes of hospitalisation by category of illness. There is evidence we have previously reported based on US defence personal data and insurance statistics, and on UK ONS data, indicating that incidence of neurological disorders, cancers, cardiac events, and strokes have increased.
Medsafe’s position on vaccine safety has clearly shifted during the two months since it last published a safety report, but has it realised the importance of more reliable causal assessments? Apparently not. The NZ public is being kept in the dark about vaccine safety as it has been for the last two years. Bland assurances of safety continue without foundation in fact.
Can mRNA Vaccination Be a Trigger Event for Death if You Are Already Sick or Elderly?
The wording of the December 14th Medsafe warning is strange and ambiguous: “..some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly”. So are the elderly especially liable to die after vaccination because of vaccination or because they are elderly? We aren’t told.
Aside from the obviously elevated rates of excess all cause deaths, anecdotal reports from rest home staff suggest this is the case. Emergency vehicles and helicopters are answering more frequent calls. Hospitals are overwhelmed and unable to cope. Whistleblowers among nurses are talking about overflowing cardiac wards. A top UK cardiologist has suggested that the evidence of harm is overwhelming and irrefutable. Funeral home workers in New Zealand and overseas have spoken publicly about strange rubbery clots in arteries which have been confirmed by experienced pathologists in the USA. Statistically improbable increases in life insurance claims data have been noted. Sudden unexplained deaths have a high profile in the media. The message is consistent—something unprecedented and very concerning is going on.
Despite having multiple sources of data and methods of analysis available to it. Medsafe has relied for two years on a single obviously flawed method of comparing CARM data to background rates, despite admitting CARM data is underreported. How strange is that? This deficiency is fatal to Medsafe’s claims of safety. It is scientifically unjustifiable and it wouldn’t meet publication criteria.
There is no possible justification for omitting to use more reliable forms of causal investigation. Medsafe has avoided public accountability by refusing to debate the issues publicly, omitting publication of key health data, massaging published data, and unforgivably accusing critics of spreading disinformation. These approaches are worthy of a dictatorship but not a modern democracy.
In 1923 three of America’s largest corporations formed a company to add tetraethyl lead to petrol. They omitted to mention it included lead and simply called their additive ‘ethyl’.
Almost immediately, production workers began to exhibit the discoordination and confusion that mark those severely poisoned by lead. Bill Bryson records that almost immediately, the Ethyl Corporation embarked on a global policy of calm but unyielding denial that would serve it well for decades.
In 2020 the world’s largest pharmaceutical corporations introduced biotech experimental injections derived from risky gene therapy research, they called them ‘vaccines’ because vaccines are universally recognised as safe and effective. Their products were neither. Even early recipients had high rates of injury, death, and pregnancy complications. Simultaneously, the manufacturing corporations obfuscated and hid this data and launched a global campaign of public relations and political lobbying on a scale never before seen in the field of public health.
If you think this is a conspiracy theory, think again. Time you looked at our Ministry of Health statistics with an open mind.
The latest MoH data on Covid deaths shows that 53% of the New Zealand population are boosted but account for 71% of Covid deaths, whereas 16% are unvaccinated and account for just 12% of deaths.
Still births per 1,000 in 2021 are up 10% compared to pre-pandemic rates and our birth rate per 1,000 population is down 10%.
Our hospitals and emergency services are still overwhelmed and no one knows quite why. Overseas rates of cancer, cardiac events, and respiratory conditions are up where data is published, but the New Zealand figures are not being made available. Why?
All cause mortality has reached record levels in 2022, at one point 26% above historical levels. The number of excess all-cause deaths greatly exceeds the number attributed to Covid.
“I wouldn’t be running out to get myself boosted. I don’t think it would be particularly useful. I don’t see any evidence to suggest it is going to benefit me.”
And yet MPs are sitting and considering a Bill to allow coroners to avoid recording a cause of death, while MoH is gearing up to regularise mRNA vaccination. In other words, parliament feels that less investigation is called for, not more. Why?
You are possibly also unaware that the origins of the Covid virus are increasingly well understood. A published scientific study has uncovered multiple microbiological signatures of synthetic genetic splicing in the Covid viral DNA, while even heavily pro-vaccine publications like Propublica have located a smoking gun in Chinese documents. Covid-19 came from a lab accident in Wuhan.
I needn’t remind you that the lab leak origin of Covid was labelled a conspiracy theory last year by Te Punaha Matatini. Nor that government with cross party support has poured millions into saturation advertising and MSM coverage telling the public that mRNA technology is safe and effective. It isn’t.
Little has been said recently about the Ardern doctrine that the government should be ‘our one source of truth’. The folly and naivete of this pronouncement from the lectern is now obvious. Science is a process that cannot be rushed to conclusions, it can only be based on evidence. We should not have insisted that the whole population be coerced to participate in experimental biotech interventions.
The purchase agreement we signed with Pfizer included the rider that the government acknowledges that the long term outcome of mRNA vaccination is unknown. The implications of this never filtered down into our pandemic policy. The government chose to endorse safety without evidence. The long term health outcomes of mRNA vaccination and pandemic policy remain unknown.
Repeated representations to government to include vaccination status on death certificates have been ignored. Without this, meaningful research into the effect of pandemic policies is impossible. The implication of a cover up is hard to avoid.
The absence of meaningful public debate, the suppression of a free press, the cancellation of dissenting expert opinion, and the politicisation of science are all hallmarks of a repressive state overreaching itself. It does no credit to New Zealand and endangers the future of our civil society. Time to wake up.
We all have friends and family who still believe their Government is benevolent, who think their response to the pandemic has been marvellous, and the mRNA jab is safe and effective. But, of course, the opposite is the reality: Our Government has declared war on its people. They are working for insane foreigner technocrats, who intend to turn us into a totalitarian state, the vaccine is neither safe nor effective, and they are doing everything they can to hide the extent and gravity of their crimes.
Despite the obvious, in-your-face lying about these crimes, for most people, including myself, comprehending the reality and gravity of the situation is far from easy. But unfortunately, continuing to believe monumental lies is the easier path to follow for many people. They may argue that they are too busy, that they already have too much on their plates to deal with. We are told by the Government and their advisers, like the Pink Lady, who is our expert about everything, that they know better than you or anyone else about what is going on, and to such as extent that they’ll fire and publicly ridicule anyone who questions their truths.
One response is to ask them to do just one thing for you and set aside a little time to plug in their headphones and listen to two podcast-style presentations. After that, you can then have a civil discussion about the issues and agree or disagree but continue to be good friends no matter the outcome.
There are many possible presentations to recommend for the busy person, but here are two which should do the job:
(Unlike other broadcasters like Michael Laws and Sean Plunket, Leighton Smith is renowned for meticulously researching his podcast topics and not talking over his guests.)
Leighton Smith Podcast: Statistician and author Guy Hatchard discusses the distortion of public information, and the age of social engineeringLeighton Smith Podcast: Statistician and author Guy Hatchard discuss the distortion of public information and the age of social engineering
I’ll add here that Guy Hatchard and I go back a long time: We were part of a small group of health professionals who have, on two occasions, prevented the passing of the Natural Health Products Bill, which essentially hijacks natural health products, including ones like also vera, vitamin C and zinc to further the aims of Big Pharma and Medical-Industrial Complex. It just happens that the Minister of Health is about to railroad this legislation through the House this year without adequate consultation. If this legislation passes, practitioners like men may become a thing of the past.
”Dr Nikki Turner, you are murdering people! … Now debate me.” – Dr James Thorp MD: This interview, hosted by a couple of Kiwi broadcasters, Kelvyn Alp and Hannah Spierer, now streaming from a USA-based platform, is a beauty. In this interview, an international medical heavyweight calls out New Zealand’s lightweight medical expert for a head-to-head debate.
As an aside, Alp and Spierers’ broadcasting platform was shut down in New Zealand a few months ago, hence the USA presence now. They are currently on bail defending themselves from prosecution by the NZ Government for holding or sharing objectionable information and face what could be years behind bars. if they lose!
Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet…we never seem to believe them. In this Stew Peters Network EXCLUSIVE, the award winning filmmakers behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES present the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.
Sean Plunket interviews Petousis Harris on the rollout of the injection including possible adverse events in terms of warning the public.
Q … “Do you think the new risk [of Myocarditis] was adequately conveyed to the public and to medical practitioners who were administering the vaccine?”
Reply … “No, I don’t”
This is really interesting because at the rollout of the injection, the FDA had already placed on their website a long list of possible side effects, very few of which were listed on the NZ Health site, indeed when posted to social media this FDA list was removed. See this article on topic
The second is uploaded at the Coronavirus Plushie video channel at bitchute.com who comment “This video was quickly deleted from the Platform’s You Tube channel, but its still on their Facebook here (above link provided).
(NaturalHealth365) In today’s latest installment of “You’ve Got to Be Kidding Me” (alternate title: “Gaslighting 101”), new reports indicate that doctors are witnessing an alarming increase in sudden adult death syndrome (SADS).
While there’s no firmly established link (yet) between SADS and COVID-19 or SADS and COVID shots, the correlation between the pandemic and this frightening uptick in sudden unexplained fatalities among young adults seems too concerning to ignore or write off as coincidence or confirmation bias, at least not without due investigation from public health officials.
Doctors seeing young, seemingly healthy adults drop dead due to sudden unexplained deaths – “unexplained” or simply explanations not allowed?
SADS is generally described as death due to a sudden and unexpected cardiac arrest among young people. A 2013 review article published in Frontiers in Physiology defines it as “sudden death under the age of 40 in the absence of structural heart disease.” A SADS “diagnosis” may be made if a young adult dies “without a known cause after an autopsy and toxicology screen,” adds HealthDesk.org. Family history, genetics, and underlying health conditions like obesity and diabetes have been historically linked to this tragic condition.
However, official data from the United Kingdom suggests that when it comes to this rise in SADS, the mRNA COVID shots might also play a role.
We already know that these shots can harm a person’s heart – thanks to the global vax agenda, “myocarditis” and “heart inflammation” have become household terms. But, after comprehensively analyzing official UK data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), The Daily Exposé has yet again provided some eye-opening insights into a health crisis that seems to be hidden in plain sight (or at least banished from mainstream media).
(NaturalHealth365) Earlier in the pandemic and vax rollout, public health officials acknowledged a potentially deadly vax-caused condition featuring thrombosis (blood clots blocking veins or arteries) plus low platelets (which help form blood clots). While the risk of this serious adverse event – called Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) – is currently considered “extremely rare,” readers are reminded that adverse events post-jab are severely underreported. According to the U.S. government’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, “less than one percent [of vax-related adverse events are] reported to the Food and Drug Administration.” So, VITT could very well be more common than officials even realize.
The early jab-rollout era also saw the spread of information about a potentially severe post-mRNA jab heart health problem known as myocarditis. Now, new research confirms that both doses of either Pfizer’s or Moderna’s mRNA injection can put you at risk.
Dedicated to the dedicated nurses, midwives and ambulance staff and to mandated practitioners.
We have been told that the Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” is “safe and effective” and would protect against covid-19; that it would protect against serious symptoms and keep people out of hospital.
Now we have a crisis in our hospitals “because of COVID”.
The truth is that in this country at least 80% of people in hospital because of COVID have been vaccinated.
The data from Australia is even more stark; I came across the following just this morning…
‘Silent No More’ is a story that every New Zealander must hear. This story is a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial service in front of parliament last week, it is a tribute to the Wellington Freedom Camp, and most importantly it is a tribute to the tens of thousands of Kiwis (probably a lot more) who have been so badly impacted by the COVID-19 vaccine.
‘Silent No More’ is a collective production of so many passionate Kiwis who just want the truth known. New Zealand needs to know the truth.
Is this the biggest scandal in New Zealand’s history?
This is a question that can only really be answered if the full truth and the full evidence is known and assessed by the people of New Zealand. Thankfully that may be beginning to happen now. But one thing is for certain. The biggest victims of this situation are now coming together, they are uniting to support each other, they are uniting to tell their stories, and they will be SILENT NO MORE.
An important point to note here. This is not an anti-vax story at all, and the information presented here is not anti-vax in any way. This is simply information and evidence about one particular vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine.
On March 29th the ‘Silent No More’ movement was officially born in New Zealand. It was an event that was created out of a collective vision and a collective effort of numerous passionate Kiwis from around the country who all had a shared desire and need to come together to tell their story and to just be heard. People from right across the country gathered in front of parliament in a memorial service to grieve together, to tell their stories together, and to deliver their petition with 12,000 signatures (gathered in just 5 days) to parliament.
Some were grieving for the health that they, and so many fellow Kiwis, have now lost. Many permanently. Some were grieving for their loved ones who have paid the ultimate price from taking the COVID-19 vaccine. All were grieving for what has been done collectively to their country and its people. There were tears. A lot of tears. But it was a watershed moment for these people, and for the thousands of others who couldn’t be there but wanted to. No longer would they be hushed up, ignored, and ridiculed by their government and the media.
‘Little White Crosses’ is a moving song written by NZ song writer Aly Cook as a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial on March 29thhttps://youtu.be/2vdvE4HmplQ It is a reference and a tribute to all those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ that were hanging peacefully on a long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp.
The people of New Zealand MUST know the truth about what has really happened in this country since the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine began in mid 2021. Not what we have been told on an almost daily basis on our television screens from the government’s podium of the ‘single source of truth’, and not what we have been told by our mainstream media who have been paid $55 million+ by that ‘single source of truth’.
Before we proceed here, the following are a few sobering facts (not misinformation) that will not be told to the people of New Zealand from the ‘single source of truth’.
In New Zealand the current number of COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions recorded on the official MedSafe database is more than 58,000. Recording a vaccine adverse reaction on the MedSafe database is not a quick and easy exercise that can be done in two minutes if you have a sore arm from the shot. It takes a lot of time and detail. You need to be committed to the cause to go into the system and input the required information. So it’s a fair bet that the majority of those 58,000+ Kiwis, or their doctors, who have taken the time and effort to do that would have had a significant reason to do it.
The majority of those 58,000+ adverse reactions have been recorded by doctors rather than the public, contrary to what the mainstream media have been saying. It is broadly agreed across the medical field around the world that only between 1% and 10% of vaccine adverse reactions will be officially recorded. Now do the maths on that one for New Zealand’s current figure.
There has been a massive increase in New Zealand, and around the world, of myocarditis (a crippling and life shortening injury to the heart) and pericarditis since the COVID vaccine rollout began. Hospitals across the country are bursting with these and similar heart related problems from the COVID-19 vaccine. So much so that on December 15th, 2021 the Ministry of Health sent a letter to all doctors in New Zealand titled ‘Urgent update on COVID-19 Vaccine-associated Myocarditis and Pericarditis’ highlighting the issue of myocarditis in relation to the COVID vaccine. The graph below shows the official government data for myocarditis and pericarditis in the United States over the last 12 years.
According to NZDSOS (NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science) there have so far been at least 400+ deaths in New Zealand from the COVID vaccine. If we also apply the rule of thumb regarding numbers of deaths recorded versus the actual number (between 1% to 10%), then this becomes a difficult point to think about.
It’s hard to say exactly how many people in New Zealand have had life changing injuries or have died from the COVID-19 vaccine, but what is very clear as the evidence is increasingly showing, and as more and more people come forward with their stories, is that the number is EXTREMELY high. The damage from the COVID vaccine is like nothing that has been seen with any other vaccine in history. Not even close. That is not just in New Zealand, that is a global situation.
As a picture of vaccine injury catastrophe becomes clearer by the day, Pfizer and the New Zealand government may eventually try to say that they were just trying to do the right thing for the safety of the country, and that they couldn’t have known this type of catastrophic vaccine fall-out would happen. But shockingly, that has now been proven not to be the case. Pfizer and the New Zealand government absolutely did know. They had all the absolutely damning safety data showing this to be the case, and they both forged ahead regardless. It has now been confirmed that Pfizer knew full well from their initial safety trials, and from very early on in the vaccine roll out around the world, that their COVID-19 vaccine had devastating and unprecedented levels of serious adverse effects, including huge and historically unprecedented levels of fatalities.
As questions and scrutiny from doctors, scientists, and the public has intensified around the world regarding the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, this resulted in a stunning new development at the end of 2021 and early 2022 regarding safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Through a ‘Freedom of Information Act’ request by a group of doctors and scientists in the United States, a Federal judge ruled that the FDA (Federal Drug Agency tasked with authorising vaccines for public use) must release the 55,000 pages of safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Previously the FDA had requested that this data be locked up and withheld from the public for 75 years. Why would they want to bury that safety data for 75 years?
The first batches of this safety data have now been released to the public over the last two months and the information released so far is absolutely shocking. It is medically horrific. Hence why the FDA and Pfizer were desperate to keep it hidden for so long.
A total of 1,223 deaths were officially attributed to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in just the first three months (December 2020 to the end of February 2021) of the initial Pfizer vaccine roll out through various countries. Just as a point of historic comparison, in the past a vaccine trial or a vaccine programme would be immediately shut down with just a handful of fatalities. The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine recorded 1,223 official fatalities in just three months and nothing was said or done by Pfizer or the FDA. Remember, the official figures typically only represent 1% to 10% of the real number.
As well as the huge number of fatalities, there were 42,086 adverse reactions officially recorded during that initial three month period. 58% of these 42,086 adverse reactions were classified as being serious, and at the time of publication of that Pfizer report 11,361 of those people had still not recovered. So the bottom line here is that the number of vaccine injuries in the first three months of the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was enormous, with the majority of those injuries being serious and long lasting. The fatality rate of the vaccine was quite simply in a different universe to what had ever been seen before in the history of vaccines.
While this is absolutely shocking information to try to comprehend, what is even more shocking is the evidence obtained in January 2022 around the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand. Through a request for information through the NZ ‘Official Information Act’, it is now confirmed and admitted by MedSafe that the New Zealand government were fully aware of this shocking and unprecedented Pfizer safety data when they rolled out their massive nationwide vaccination drive starting in mid 2021, several months after this Pfizer data was first known. The New Zealand government knew about this damning and unprecedented safety data when they rolled out their ‘90% vaxxed’ marketing campaign, they knew about it when they enforced their ‘no jab, no job’ mandates, and they knew about it when they implemented medical apartheid across the country with their vaccine passports to try to force the entire population to take the vaccine. The New Zealand government knew about the damning Pfizer safety data as they continued to drum out their ‘safe and effective’ mantra from their podium of truth to the people of New Zealand, and they demonised anyone daring to challenge this as being ‘vaccine hesitant’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, and dangerous peddlers of ‘vaccine misinformation’.
Here is an extract from the response from MedSafe to that ‘Official Information Act’ request. Among a number of questions asked to Medsafe in that request, here is Question 1;
“Please provide information to show when Pfizer or its agents first provided to any representative of the NZ government a copy of the CUMULATIVE-ANALYSIS-OF-POST-AUTHORIZATION-ADVERSE-EVENTREPORTS-OF-PF-07302048-BNT162B2-RECEIVED-THROUGH-28-FEB-2021 that was recently released through the US courts, ‘when did the New Zealand government first know about the safety data in that Pfizer report?’
(the same Pfizer safety data mentioned above)
The response from MedSafe to this question was;
“I can advise that as a part of the provisional consent for the Comirnaty COVID-19 granted in New Zealand under the Medicines Act 1981, Pfizer has provided the same data, albeit in a form that meets the company’s legal obligations in New Zealand. The conclusions of the Cumulative Analysis Report are consistent with the information and data provided by Pfizer to Medsafe as a part of its provisional consent obligations in New Zealand.”
Here is a link to the full letter of response from MedSafe.
Therefore, the New Zealand government had that exact same safety data as that damning Pfizer report when they made the decision to give the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine provisional consent for ‘emergency use authorisation’ in New Zealand and gave the go ahead to implement New Zealand’s mass COVID-19 vaccine roll out. A quite stunning and sobering thought that this could occur in this country.
Incredibly, it gets even worse than this. The Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) essentially forced all doctors and health practitioners in New Zealand to support their ‘safe and effective’ narrative, and prohibited any discussion by these medical professionals that was in any way contrary to this narrative. They sent a letter to every doctor and health practitioner in New Zealand and effectively forced them not to deviate from the official government narrative about the COVID-19 vaccine being ‘safe and effective’. Here is an extract from that letter:
“As regulators we respect an individual’s right to have their own opinions, but it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners.”
These doctors and health practitioners across the country have been seeing and dealing with unprecedented and truly shocking numbers of serious heart problems, blood clots, neurological issues, and numerous other serious adverse reactions from the COVID vaccine, and they have not been allowed to say anything to the New Zealand public other than to reinforce the COVID vaccine as ‘safe and effective’. Any doctors that have attempted to speak out and raise any kind of concerns about the COVID vaccine have been swiftly dealt to and suspended, and demonised by the mainstream media.
Therefore, every single one of the 95% of people in New Zealand who have taken the COVID vaccine have taken it under illegal circumstances. They have taken it without the legally required informed consent as they were not given the information about the true safety data that the government and the Ministry of Health knowingly had at the time, and doctors were prevented from raising any concerns with their patients so that the people of New Zealand could make an informed decision.
The New Zealand government effectively ‘forced’ 95% of the country to take the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine knowing full well the shocking safety data and fatality rate of that vaccine. A significant number of those 95% will have taken the COVID vaccine under severe duress and essentially against their will as so many people in New Zealand had seemingly very well founded concerns about this particular vaccine, but they felt they had no option but to take it due to the job mandates and/or vaccine passports. So many Kiwis have now paid a very large price for that.
Now, as more and more people in New Zealand come forward and are ‘silent no more’, we are starting to see what the true, awful impact of this has been. All the hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ hanging peacefully on that long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp. Those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling there every day right in front of all the politicians inside the Beehive as a daily reminder to them that they had sanctioned the use of that Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine despite what was known about it, and they had also sanctioned the extreme measures implemented to ensure that nearly every person in New Zealand felt they had little choice but to take it. Is this why not one single politician inside the Beehive was prepared to come out and just speak with and listen to these people during those three weeks of the Wellington Freedom Camp?
As those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling in front of our politician’s offices eventually became just a little too emotionally awkward for them, on March 2nd those ‘little white crosses’ were unmercifully ripped down, burned to ashes, and banished from sight. But that has not ended things for the huge number of Kiwis whose lives have been destroyed, and whose loved ones are no longer with us.
All proceeds from the song ‘Little White Crosses’ will go towards supporting Silent No More NZ and supporting all the Kiwis who have been injured by the COVID-19 vaccine.
Note: listen to the interviews with the VX injured, no matter how close to the jab the adverse event, victims say the white coats are regularly denying any connection. Listen to the ACC advocate who has spoken out. To word from the Health Forum NZ. The common thread repeated verbatim is … ‘no connection’ or coincidental. Consider signing the petition. Link below. EWR
That the house of representatives in New Zealand formally recognise those harmed by the Covid-19 vaccines.
As of 28 February, 2022 there have been 58,399 reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccine in New Zealand. These injuries are recorded on the Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring site (CARM/MEDSAFE)
We demand that any adverse reactions reported to CARM are investigated as legitimate vaccine injuries and treated as such until it is conclusively proven otherwise.
Please note that all donations are going to Change.org to boost this petition and not our cause. We are in the middle of setting up a charity which we will update you on this petition once we have everything sorted.
“There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released. Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.” Hatchard Report
Yesterday there was a short article in the NZ Herald which discussed the release by the Ministry of Health of some data. The day before, writing in his column in the Northern Advocate, local opposition MP Dr Shane Reti reported that incidents of self harm among 10-14 year olds have increased by 30 percent since the arrival of Covid.
Disturbing though this is, the response was also disturbing, Shane Reti was admonished for writing about the data which was provided to him by the Ministry of Health. According to the article, Dr Reti should have asked the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little first. The Northern Advocate and Dr Reti apologised for the ‘confusion’ this caused.
Covid-19 data is being hidden There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released.
Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.
Yesterday our courts were also pondering the paucity of information released and its misleading character—some doctors and teachers were asking for a relaxing of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination mandates. Following the press coverage, it seems that the arguments being debated have already been decided by mainstream media for us.
The arguments are really very simple and the ‘facts’ are equally so. A tsunami of adverse effects Medsafe has published a summary of 53,000 adverse effects reported to them following Covid-19 vaccination. This is a per capita rate 30 times larger than that of any previous vaccination programme, and Medsafe itself admits that adverse effects are grossly underreported and uses the figure 95% unreported.
Now correct me if I’m wrong, but if I was in Medsafe or in politics I would be wanting to investigate this alarming figure more thoroughly. Given that a large percentage of our population are already affected and possibly at risk in the future, I would look very closely not just at the reports themselves but also at the specific categories of risk that Pfizer itself has already flagged. This is a very long list, now publicly available.
How would I do that? I would compile hospital admission data and GP visit data for these conditions. From Dr Shane Reti’s column, it appears that the Ministry of Health might have already done this, but they haven’t released the data and our politicians appear to be very worried that they might do so without first asking the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little. Very Little data has reached our ears.
I would also require an enhanced use of autopsy to determine if there were any unusual characteristics of deaths proximate to mRNA Covid vaccination similar to those reported overseas. These include preponderance of micro blood clotting, changes in character and viscosity of blood, and major organ damage.
Public Statement by Guy Hatchard Ph.D. Following a meeting with the Chief Commissioner Paul Hunt of the NZ Human Rights Commission
23 February 2022
Dear Commissioner
Thank you for providing the opportunity to present to yourself and staff yesterday afternoon. I did so as an individual scientist but on the invitation of Voices For Freedom. I remain independent of groups, but maintain communication with many groups and colleagues on scientific issues.
I am not a protestor, nor do I have any history prior to the pandemic of publicly opposing vaccination. I am formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
I am a long standing advocate of the benefits and safety of those natural approaches to diet and medicine which have been adequately scientifically verified. I have my own website, HatchardReport.com.
At the conclusion of the meeting you said that the HRC would make a public statement and left the participants free to make public statements themselves. Thank you.
This morning I read your public statement following the meeting which affirms that you feel a duty to listen, and adduces “It’s clear that the protesters who I have met with have very real stories of loss and suffering. They feel broken and discarded due to the impact of Covid-19 health measures on their lives.” You also expressed a measure of caution.
As a person experienced in the analysis of data and the assessment of scientific information, I am increasingly aware of deficiencies in official NZ pandemic data and its use to support continuations of now outdated government policy. Outdated government policy and incomplete official data directly impacts the rights of individuals.
For example, since 21 August 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been publishing data related to the Covid outbreak in a cumulative fashion. This data shows that 60% of cases occur in the vaccinated (against a vaccinated population rate of 79%), and that 70% of hospitalisations are among the unvaccinated.
This appears to strongly support vaccination, however it is misleading due to the cumulative nature of the data, (and incidentally because of the way vaccination status is categorised). Cumulative data only reveals the average of the whole outbreak, not the current daily and weekly trends.
Since October 2021, members of my support team have been calculating ‘snapshots’ of data by subtracting report data from each subsequent report. This has allowed me to see the current burden of cases by vaccination status for any specific time period, and to calculate the hospitalisation risk disparity for cases by vaccination status. Below is an example of the data between February 17 and 18:
This snapshot data paints a very different and relevant picture. It is indicative that during the present phase of our Covid outbreak, those that are vaccinated may be at slightly higher risk of hospitalisation than those who are unvaccinated. The general trends and overseas data support this concern.
You will be well aware that this is in contrast to government and media messaging strongly encouraging booster vaccinations as essential. If you ignore the crucial issue of very high rates of adverse effects, this could possibly be supported by the historical cumulative Covid data, but it is certainly not supported by current data.
The reason for the ineffectiveness of mRNA vaccination must also be obvious to you from yesterday’s presentations and the supporting submissions provided to you by presenters. The characteristics of Omicron are quite different from those of Delta. Omicron is a variant that has adapted to prefer infection of vaccinated individuals. From the perspective of genomics, this results from the well documented path of viral evolution.
I note that Medsafe has admitted in small print on its website, generally unnoticed and uncommented by media, that the phenomenon of vaccine acquired immune deficiency (which I allude to above) is a risk about which they have concern.
The Human Rights implications of this are also obvious. Incentives and encouragement to vaccinate, when its benefit is in doubt, but the risk of harm is well documented, do not amount to a process of informed consent or medical risk mitigation. Today in your public statement you clearly extend personal sympathy to those affected by adverse vaccine reactions.
Many among the wider population are becoming aware of risks through personal experiences. For example a friend of mine is a director of a large business, one of his relatives has been affected by myocarditis, but his work colleagues remained sceptical of any risk.
Recently the father of one of their employees had a booster shot immediately followed by a massive heart attack. As a result, the opinion of his colleagues has swung back in full support of my friend’s informed choice. This kind of experience is reforming public opinion up and down the country (and even I have heard in Parliament). It is no surprise that booster uptake has barely reached 50% of those eligible.
I come to the point of my writing, in addition to a big thank you for taking the time to listen at length, I submit that the human rights abuses are a matter of daily misery for many, extending to some dramatic and devastating personal health impacts which are escalating as booster shots are rolled out. In my opinion, it is not tenable to delay action.
The government has curated extremes of public opinion fearful of Covid outcomes, in favour of experimental mRNA vaccination, and prejudiced against those reluctant to vaccinate. As you know, this has extended to punitive measures.
As published evidence has accumulated which points to increased health risks of vaccination and therefore a need to revise policy, the government has dug its heels in and doubled down on announcements of vaccine safety and effectiveness. The Ministry of Health’s restricted presentation of data along with its refusal to institute mandatory reporting of adverse effects verges on the deliberately misleading and implies a cover up.
I surmise from your extensive history of supporting human rights, that you will know there is a fine line between unfortunate mistakes and deliberate suppression of fact. I believe that line is now being crossed in New Zealand.
Leadership in this situation involves a willingness to speak up, even if the message may be unwelcome, and a capacity to change direction. Every day that passes by without action means growing economic misery and exclusion for some and crucially some serious health incidents for others. There is an imperative for the Commission to stand up and say unequivocally there is a case which has been made and needs to be answered. A case that requires an open public dialogue.
Therefore I warmly welcome your statement:
“The job given to the Human Rights Commission, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata, by Parliament is to listen, conciliate, educate and advance human rights and responsibilities for all”
I am asking you here to follow this statement with a timely call for a wider public process that will go beyond a possibly poorly informed, and certainly based on past experience, opaque review confined within the corridors of parliamentary power. The HRC is there to protect and uphold rights independently from parliament.
As I indicated in my submission, incidence of adverse effects and death proximate to Covid vaccination in NZ and elsewhere have far surpassed thresholds set by medical ethics and protocol that should also trigger an immediate pause in vaccination. This is not a time to delay, the situation has already passed beyond a point requiring prompt action. Can you please advise me of the intended HRC time frame?
I will, as you have already indicated I may, make this statement publicly available.
I look forward to hearing more from the Commission shortly. I remain ready to provide any scientific information you need within a short time frame. As you know, I have already submitted to the HRC a list of 1000 published papers on adverse effects of mRNA vaccination.
All roads have led to this. The convoy emerged out of a failure by governing officials to listen to the people, not just some of the people but all of the people and to move with the science as science does what it is supposed to do; observe, then replicate then change its findings in light of new data.
All checks and balances that denote an honest system were censored leaving people little room to do much else and inspired by the Canadian Truckers – kiwis have jumped in their cars and headed to the capital to get the politicians to hear them.
Lies have been told, no mandates, no one would lose their jobs, she lied. We know the outcome of that. without apology, without explanation a hard punitive and divisive line was taken by Jacinda Adern’s government, throwing representative democracy to the kerb. Under emergency powers, which by the way, when this is over, should never ever be allowed to happen again by any sitting party.
Looking back over the past two years we have seen a draconian punishment measure for those who relish freedom to choose. A foundation of human expression, human freedoms and human right is the ability to choose what medical treatment we allow on our bodies more so if it’s an experimental one. Whoever in this day and age thought that these could be take away so arbitrarily so completely by hysterical models that have proven incorrect? A failure every step of the way.
I reject this Amendment Bill as well as the original Health Response Bill No.1. In particular I reject all aspects of it related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Any continued roll out of the current mass vaccine programme, especially the continuation and increasing powers of vaccine mandates through Vaccine certificates and ‘no jab, no job’ is by law a crime against humanity according to the 1947 Nuremberg Code (see Appendix for reference) as well as the NZ Bill of Rights. Even ‘coercion’ for the COVID-19 vaccine is classified as a crime against humanity according to the Nuremberg Code…
“In Part 1 we provided some detailed background information around why this piece of so called ‘journalism’ was so out of order for a mainstream media outlet to be acting as the personal PR department for Jacinda Ardern to help with damage control around the avalanche of information and evidence pouring out in contradiction of everything that she and the NZ government are saying and doing regarding COVID-19 and the mass vaccination campaign. We also provided background information on why the claims of vaccine ‘misinformation’ were so misplaced.”
Reignite Democracy Australia, which was started by journalist Monica Smit, an outspoken critic on authoritarian lockdowns in Australia who was just released from jail on bond last week, has started a group called “Nurses Speak Out” where gagged nurses are speaking out about the truth of what is currently going on inside of hospitals with people suffering from vaccine injuries.
They are posting these stories on their Telegram channel as well.
This is an Anonymous whistleblowing channel for Nurses & Healthcare workers in Australia. We will share verified experiences from frontline workers who see firsthand the damage caused by COVID-19 vaccinations.
These submissions have been vetted by a collective of health professionals. Some details may be omitted, your identity will be protected. AHPRA has gagged, coerced and threatened anyone who comes forward – let’s save some lives.
This channel is dedicated to all frontline workers around the world. This is Australia. This is for you.
Here are some of their stories that have just been published.
Hi,
I’m a community RN on the —— , Qld.
I am seeing and caring for adversely affected clients who have had the vaccines and are quite literally dying. Our palliative care is increasing at an exponential rate, people are getting diagnosed with terminal conditions and dying quickly. We (community nurses) are seeing 2-3 palliative clients per day each, this is a massive increase from 1-2 each per week. Other palliative clients who haven’t been vaxxed, then their families talk them into the vax, die more quickly than expected.
Have noted that those who are vaxxed that their clinically ‘weak’ areas are being exacerbated. Appears to be at 3, 5 then 12 week patterned intervals. Not one of them associate with the C19vax.
Had one man in his 70’s in very stable remission with leukemia for years. Within 3 weeks of having ‘the vaccine’ his white cell count dropped so he had neutropenia. He suddenly developed in 24 hours bilateral cellulitis to both legs up to thighs. 9 weeks later, he is dead.
You must be logged in to post a comment.