Today we’re launching Substantial Minority: The Missing Covid-19 Inquiry Presentations. Why? The RCI was supposed to hold two weeks of public hearings – one hearing from affected New Zealanders, one questioning the officials who engineered the response. But Ardern, Hipkins, Verrall and Robertson all refused to appear. The Commission cancelled the entire week rather than hear from the Kiwis still waiting to speak. Their research deserves to be heard. So we’re putting it on the record ourselves – before the final report drops in February.
→ Erika Whittome — Withheld safety reports and hidden procurement exposed through OIAs
→ Sue Grey — The legal battles that changed the Medicines Act overnight
→ Dr Alison Goodwin — Pharmacovigilance failures and buried symptom data
→ Ursula Edgington PhD — How behavioural psychology was used to nudge the nation
→ Jodie Bruning — Scientific evidence excluded and legislation passed in secret → And more testimonies the commissioners should have heard coming soon
Ursula Edgington: How a Nation Was Nudged Dr Ursula Edgington analyses the “Nudge Unit” strategies, MINDSPACE report, and propaganda techniques used in New Zealand’s Unite Against COVID-19 campaign.
Sue Grey: The Legal Battles New Zealand Didn’t See Lawyer Sue Grey details three High Court cases challenging New Zealand’s vaccine rollout and mandates, including the case that prompted overnight law changes.
Jodie R Bruning: The Science That Was Excluded Jodie Bruning of PSGR NZ examines how Health Act obligations were ignored, scientific debate was suppressed, and legislation was passed in secret.
Here’s what we’re asking:Watch what speaks to you. Share it with one person tonight.This evidence needs to reach as many New Zealanders as possible before February.
Closed court, last minute submissions of evidence by an epidemiologist, NZ lawyer Sue Grey not allowed in because she is not vaccinated, ‘evidence of a complete stitch up’ says Andrew Bridgen (surprised?) … must hear discussion with Andrew Bridgen (UK), Liz Gunn and whistleblower Barry Young ahead of court today 9am in Wellington NZ.
EWNZ comment: do review our glyphosate pages at the main menu. I looked at this topic in the Rangitikei during 2013-2016, attempting to switch the council’s weed control to steam. At the end of the day, it appears that councils NZ wide prefer to use poison … surprised?Comfortably in bed with Agrichem.
“Millions of pounds of glyphosate were approved, defended, and sprayed worldwide on the basis of a paper we now know was fundamentally compromised and scientifically invalid.“
In a long-overdue move, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology has formally retracted the landmark 2000 glyphosate “safety” review by Williams, Kroes, and Munro — a paper Monsanto and global regulators have relied on for decades to assert that Roundup poses no carcinogenic risk to humans.
Crucially, the Editor-in-Chief confirms that Monsanto employees likely secretly wrote substantial portions of the paper, despite never being listed as authors or acknowledged — a revelation uncovered through U.S. litigation.
The retraction states that the article’s integrity has collapsed entirely, citing undisclosed corporate authorship, omitted carcinogenicity data, financial conflicts of interest, and a complete failure by the surviving author to respond to the journal’s investigation.
THE RETRACTION
1. Based almost entirely on Monsanto’s unpublished studies The review’s “no cancer risk” conclusion relied solely on Monsanto-generated data. Even worse, the authors ignored multiple long-term mouse and rat carcinogenicity studies that already existed at the time — including multi-year toxicity studies showing tumor signals. None were incorporated.
2. Evidence of ghostwriting by Monsanto Litigation records revealed that Monsanto employees secretly co-wrote portions of the paper, despite never being listed as authors or acknowledged. This alone violates the most basic principles of scientific integrity.
3. Undisclosed financial ties The authors appear to have received direct compensation from Monsanto for producing the paper — again undisclosed, again violating journal standards.
4. Misrepresentation of authorship and contributions By hiding Monsanto’s role, the paper created the illusion of independent scientific evaluation — even as corporate employees shaped the conclusions.
5. Regulatory capture revealed This paper heavily influenced global risk assessments — including U.S. EPA, WHO/FAO, and Health Canada evaluations — setting the tone for “glyphosate is safe” messaging for more than two decades.
While I am strongly opposed to politically motivated retractions and scientific censorship, this retraction was unquestionably warranted. The integrity failures were not ideological — they were structural, factual, and undeniable.
And the independent evidence that has emerged since 2000 only underscores how dangerous that original “all clear” truly was.
A recent controlled animal study demonstrated that glyphosate and Roundup can induce rare, aggressive, and fatal cancers across multiple organs — even at doses considered “safe” by U.S. and EU regulatory thresholds. These findings directly contradict the original review’s core conclusions.
Zhang et al found a statistically significant association between glyphosate exposure and increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans. Their 2019 meta-analysis pooled data from over 65,000 participants across six studies—including more than 7,000 NHL cases—and reported a 41% increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma among those with the highest glyphosate exposure:
In other words, independent science was pointing to serious cancer risks while Monsanto’s fraudulent ghostwritten review was actively minimizing them.
Millions of pounds of glyphosate were approved, defended, and sprayed across the world on the basis of a review that we now know was fundamentally compromised and scientifically invalid.
The collapse of this paper is not just a correction, it is an indictment of an entire regulatory era built on deception.
Barry Young (NZ vaccine data whistleblower) sits down with barrister Ken Nicolson, a calm, experienced lawyer who has quietly represented many vaccine-injured Kiwis.
With the crucial voir dire hearing set for 11 December in Wellington District Court (deciding if Barry qualifies for full whistleblower protection under the Protected Disclosures Act), they discuss: – Crown’s last-minute attempt to dump a revised “expert” report just 3 days before trial
Whether “reasonable grounds” means an ordinary worker’s honest belief or a PhD epidemiologist’s hindsight analysis
Good faith, retaliation, and why the Act should protect Barry, not criminalise him
The bigger stakes for free speech, democracy and public health in NZ and beyond
Ken confirms he’ll be in court on the 11th. Barry is still unrepresented and facing a 7-year charge.
Kiwis: come to Wellington District Court, 9 am, Thursday 11 December.
Bring cameras, fill the pavement, show the world NZ still has rule of law.
Steve Kirsch joins to discuss Barry Young’s crucial Voir Dire hearing which is taking place this Thursday 11 Dec 2025 in the Wellington District Court. Key points include:
Crown drops 19-page “expert” evidence amendment just 3 days before trial (image-only PDF, non-searchable)
Retired Prof Robert Scragg admits he never analysed the full 2.2 million-row dataset – he stopped at 1 million rows
Scragg claims “MedSafe stopped monitoring the jab outcomes and that that is “proof of safety”
Kirsch: Czech, NZ, Japan, Israel & US data all show the same mortality spikes, post-vaccination
If judge rules that only people with PhD’s or other equivalent level of academic training, qualify as ‘whistleblowers’, then NZ whistleblower protection will be dead
Crown has already signalled they will apply for an ‘instant appeal. if they lose this Voir Dire hearing on December 11.
Barry faces jail for releasing FULLY anonymised, pay-per-dose, data showing serious harm signals.
The Ministry of Health in New Zealand still refuses to release its OWN analysis after 735 days since Barry brought his sincere concerns to their attention.
Please come to Wellington if you can, to support Barry:
Thursday 11 December, 9 am, Wellington District Court.
Share widely – worldwide ‘eyes on this case’ matter enormously, in order for Barry Young to have any chance of getting any kind of fairness in this Voir Dire, and for him to be officially designated as the brave Whistleblower that he is.
Governments are moving quickly to roll out digital ID systems that tie together identity, payments, and access to everyday life. In the United Kingdom, we’re already seeing the push to make digital identification mandatory. Once money is fully digitized, every purchase can be tracked, limited, or even denied.
That’s not some far-off scenario. We all need to be acting now to push back against this agenda, which is why we’re excited to announce that the Solari 60-Day Cash Challenge officially starts this week.
Why a Cash Challenge?
Using cash is one of the simplest, most effective ways to push back against the march toward an all-digital financial system. Over the next 60 days, we invite you to make the deliberate choice to pay with cash as often as possible when buying groceries, coffee, gas, when eating out, or with purchases from any brick-and-mortar merchant.
Beyond using cash whenever possible, we also challenge you to consider taking some of the following actions in the next 60 days to raise awareness about using cash and why it’s important to do so.
More Ways to Take Action in the Next 60 Days
Spread the word: Send this article by Catherine, The Threat of Financial Transaction Control, to five friends and ask that they join you in the challenge to use cash whenever possible for the next 60 days. Even better would be to post the link and encouragement to use cash on one of your social media accounts to reach more people. Tag us when you do on X and Instagram.
Take a Deeper Dive: Watch Solari’s briefing on Keeping Cash in Circulation: A Key Tool Against the Digital Control Grid to deepen your understanding of the issues at hand. The briefing, held on June 12, 2025, focused on one of the most powerful strategies we have to push back against the emerging digital control grid: keeping cash in circulation. Financial planner Tim Caban opened the session by framing the critical importance of preserving cash as a cornerstone of financial freedom and privacy. Susan Luschas, Tobi Maier, and Elizabeth Murphy then discussed legislative actions taken in various states to protect and promote the use of cash, as well as strategies that have proven effective for building public and political support. They also provided details on model bills that can raise awareness and build momentum.
Celebrate Cash on Halloween: If you participate in Halloween, check out our “Cash is King” Halloween initiative. For the past two years, inspired by subscriber Susan Luschas’s example, we have promoted Susan’s idea of creating a “Cash Is King” Halloween. Instead of poisoning trick-or-treaters with candy, Susan hands out dollar bills, placing “Cash Is King: Why Pay with Cash?” stickers on each bill. This has made her house one of the neighborhood’s most popular Halloween destinations, prompting the eager trick-or-treaters to run home and tell their parents about the merits of paying with cash. Discover more about the initiative here.
Join the Movement
Join us! Take the pledge to use cash for the next 60 days. Share your stories, photos, and reasons for choosing cash. Encourage your friends and family to do the same. Together, we can show others how important it is to use and protect cash usage.
Cash is Freedom. Cashless is Control. Let’s keep freedom alive—one purchase at a time.
In a move that was long overdue, on November 7th President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to launch an antitrust investigation into what Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) called the “meatpacking oligopoly”.
Four giant multinational corporations have come to control the vast majority of beef processing in the US. They are Brazilian firm JBS, Cargill, Brazilian-owned National Beef and Tyson Foods.
According to Farm Action, ranchers have gone from earning 70 cents of every beef dollar in 1970 to earning only 37 cents today. Meanwhile the Big Four packers have gone from controlling 36% of the market in 1980 to processing 85% of all cattle today.
A statement issued from the White House read,
“For too long, a handful of giant meat packers have squeezed America’s cattle producers, shrunk herds, and jacked up prices at the grocery store.By examining whether these companies have violated antitrust laws through coordinated pricing or capacity restrictions, this investigation will root out any illegal collusion, restore fair competition, and protect our food security…Two of these companies, including the largest meat packer in the world, are either foreign-owned or have significant foreign ownership and control.”
Things are not much better for swine and poultry producers. Four corporations (JBS, Tyson, Hormel and WH Group) control 70% of US hog processing, while four (Tyson, JBS, Wayne Sanderson and Perdue Farms) also control 60% of poultry processing.
The Brazilian JBS is owned by the Batista brothers. Earlier this year they donated a record $5 million to Trump’s inaugural committee while doubling their PAC spending. This year also saw JBS listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which will only increase their access to capital and further consolidate their growing market share.
Cargill is a private corporation owned by the Minneapolis-based Cargill and MacMillan families. They control 50% of the global grain trade and own more Mississippi River ports and cargo ships than any other corporation. They also monopolize the trade in Brazilian orange juice, Moroccan sulphur, Filipino rice and the global egg and fertilizer industries just to name a few.
Tyson Foods is an Arkansas company which purchased Iowa Beef Packers in 2001 to become one of the Big Four beef processors. Their control over pork and poultry processing increased under AR Gov. and US President Bill Clinton, whose political career was heavily funded by Don Tyson and Winthrop Rockefeller’s International Paper. Their brands include Hillshire Farms, Ballpark, Sara Lee and Bryan.
Kansas City-based National Beef is owned by another Brazilian multinational called Marfrig. They bought Farmland Industries in 1992 and are run by the powerful dos Santos family. They worked closely with Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) to create PlantPlus foods. ADM is in turn tied to the Brazilian/Swiss Bunge and Born families. Bunge is one of the top four grain traders in the world.
WH Group is based in Hong Kong and is the largest pork producer and processor in the world. They own Smithfield Foods in the US and were a pioneer in funding inhumane hog confinement systems that now dot the US landscape. Despite myths that Smithfield is “Chinese-owned”, it was Goldman Sachs that funded is meteoric rise. As of 2013 Goldman Sachs still held a controlling 5.2% share.
Much of the inflation in the US economy can be attributed to concentration of power within nearly every industry. The era of deregulation ushered in by President Ronald Reagan must be reversed. Cartels must be broken up using antitrust laws. And there is no better place to start than the food processing industry.
EWNZ comment: I recall a friend’s hubby having a heart attack back in the late 80s, at 43. It was noticeably rare & met with great shock and unbelief at the time. Look around now however and you will hear and read of many very young folk having heart attacks. Especially since around 2020. I wonder why that was? If you sub to Prof Mark Crispin Miller at Substack you will scroll page upon page of heart attacks in the very young. This info below is IMO important for the heart compromised in terms of surviving. I too would have thought they would have greater resilience but it appears that that is not necessarily so ….
When a 45-year-old survives a heart attack, doctors and family members typically assume recovery will be swift. Youth equals resilience, right? A new study published in the European Heart Journal has shattered that dangerous assumption, revealing that nearly 1 in 10 heart attack patients under 55 are severely frail, and their mortality risk is dramatically higher than anyone expected.
What makes this discovery particularly alarming is that these young patients face a nearly fourfold higher risk of premature death compared to older heart attack survivors with the same frailty level. Yet conventional cardiology continues screening older patients while younger ones slip through the cracks, unidentified, untreated, and dying an average of six years earlier than expected.
Massive study exposes hidden vulnerability in young heart attack survivors
Researchers analyzed 931,133 heart attack cases across England and Wales, dividing patients into three age groups: under 55, ages 55-74, and 75 and older. Among patients under 55, researchers classified 3,710 – roughly 2.4% – as severely frail.
Young severely frail patients showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 6.69 for all-cause mortality within one year. Compare that to 4.33 for middle-aged patients and just 2.31 for older patients. Young frail patients faced 3.51 times higher mortality risk than older frail patients, a complete reversal of what doctors expect based on age alone.
Years of life lost painted an even grimmer picture. Young severely frail heart attack patients died an average of 6.1 years earlier than expected.
Young frailty looks nothing like what doctors learned in medical school
Western medicine defines frailty through geriatric symptoms: slow walking speed, weakness, falls, and cognitive decline. This outdated framework blinds doctors to what’s actually happening in younger populations – rapid accumulation of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, not physical deterioration.
Young, frail heart attack patients showed dramatically higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and early-onset heart failure. They had higher body mass index, were more likely to smoke, and had a family history of coronary artery disease.
The study also exposed troubling care disparities. Severely frail patients across all age groups demonstrated lower adherence to quality care standards: delayed procedures, fewer cardiology admissions, lower medication prescription rates, and minimal cardiac rehabilitation referrals.
Natural solutions address the root causes of premature cardiovascular aging
Pharmaceutical cardiology treats symptoms while ignoring the metabolic dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and mitochondrial damage, creating premature frailty in young bodies.
Focus on metabolic optimization: Make wild-caught fatty fish a regular part of your diet for anti-inflammatory omega-3s that reduce cardiovascular inflammation. Incorporate organic pasture-raised eggs to provide choline for methylation pathways crucial to homocysteine metabolism. Include 100% grass-fed beef and lamb to supply L-carnitine and CoQ10 for mitochondrial energy production in stressed heart muscle. Eliminate processed seed oils, refined carbohydrates, and sugar that drive insulin resistance, the metabolic foundation of premature cardiovascular aging.
Consider strategic supplementation: Ensure adequate magnesium glycinate to support over 300 enzymatic reactions essential to cardiovascular function. Make CoQ10 a priority if you have heart disease or take statins, which deplete this vital nutrient. Add taurine to support electrical stability in the heart muscle and protect against oxidative stress. Include vitamin K2 (MK-7) to direct calcium away from arteries and into bones where it belongs.
Address lifestyle fundamentals: Recognize that chronic stress elevates cortisol and inflammatory markers, accelerating biological aging. Make restorative sleep a non-negotiable priority – poor sleep quality independently doubles the risk of a heart attack. Work with a qualified holistic practitioner to address hidden infections and gut dysbiosis driving systemic inflammation throughout your body.
Discover comprehensive natural strategies for cardiovascular resilience
Jonathan Landsman’s Cardiovascular Docu-Class brings together 22 leading cardiologists, researchers, and nutritional experts, revealing evidence-based approaches that address the mechanisms driving heart disease and premature aging. Discover functional lab tests detecting cardiovascular vulnerability years before heart attacks occur, natural protocols for reversing arterial damage and metabolic dysfunction, hidden infections and toxins accelerating biological aging, and drug-induced nutritional deficiencies worsening heart failure.
Bottom line: Young heart attack survivors face a hidden frailty crisis that Western medicine fails to recognize. Nearly 1 in 10 patients under 55 show severe vulnerability, and their mortality risk vastly exceeds older patients with identical frailty levels. Optimal cardiovascular health requires addressing root causes – metabolic dysfunction, mitochondrial damage, chronic inflammation, and nutrient deficiencies – through targeted nutrition, strategic supplementation, and lifestyle interventions, rather than age-based assumptions and pharmaceutical protocols that ignore biological reality.
Now that Randy Andy has been exposed as an Epstein-associated degenerate, even the most dyed-in-the-wool defenders of the British royal family are starting to question their fealty to the House of Windsor. But do you know just how many pedophiles have personally mentored and advised King Charles himself? Strap in, because you’re about to learn just how deep the royal rabbit hole really goes.
Posting this here today so you can access the doco ‘Just Look Up’, featured by Jonathan Otto. It is only available for a couple of days. Particularly for those who still think it’s conspiracy. EWNZ
From Jonathan’s newsletter (includes recommendations for detoxing):
Here’s a moment from the Just Look Up film that stopped me cold:
Weather modification isn’t a future theory at all.
It’s not some sci-fi concept that just “showed up” in recent years…
According to public records, the U.S. has been actively modifying weather since the 1940s…
And by the 1960s, almost every state had an ongoing program.
Planes releasing specific materials into cloud systems…
Programs designed to increase rainfall in dry regions…
Projects aimed at shaping storms over targeted areas.
And it wasn’t limited to America.
The World Meteorological Organization has documented that dozens of countries have weather modification programs running today…
After more than seven decades of worldwide use.
So if you’ve ever looked up and felt like something about the sky has changed…
You’re NOT imagining things.
You’re noticing a real, documented human footprint in the atmosphere…
One that rarely gets discussed in the mainstream story of climate and health.
Because once you accept that humans have been altering clouds for generations…
You can’t help but ask the next question:
What has that been doing to our weather over time… to our ecosystems… and to us?
That’s exactly why I personally Executive Produced Just Look Up, directed by my good friend Ariana Victor.
The world premiere is happening right now, at no cost, for only a few days.
I joined my dear friend and colleague Dr Eric Berg to discuss censorship, the “Dirty Dozen”, and how Big Tech’s crackdown ignited a global movement for bodily sovereignty.
In this powerful conversation, Dr Eric Berg interviews me about my twenty year journey in my role as founder of GreenMedInfo, long-time natural health advocate, and one of the infamous “Disinformation Dozen” – to unpack how I was suddenly recast as a “domestic extremist” and even a “terrorist” simply for championing natural health and medical freedom.
In this video I explain how:
In 2019, Google quietly carried out what he calls a “digital book burning”, wiping out around 99% of natural health search results overnight.
A tiny UK outfit, the CCDH (Centre for Countering Digital Hate), helped script a playbook that turned natural health advocates into convenient villains – laundering censorship through NGOs that platforms and governments could hide behind.
How my website, business and YouTube presence were targeted, with cancer, vitamin D, immunity and COVID-related content stripped away under the banner of “misinformation” for daring to disagree with “consensus”.
But this isn’t just a horror story – it has a genuinely surprising ending.
I share how, after years of deplatforming, demonetisation and defamation, the tides are turning, with three of my accounts were recently reinstated. The platforms admitted they should never have been removed under their own community standards – right as Sayer is pursuing a federal civil rights lawsuit. At the same time, public trust in Big Pharma is collapsing, RFK Jr has moved into a position of real influence over health policy, and millions more people are suddenly awake to the importance of bodily sovereignty.
Together, Dr Berg and Sayer explore:
How “scientism” and “medical monotheism” replaced genuine evidence-based medicine with pronouncements from on high.
The way words like drug, disease and misinformation have been strategically redefined to sideline food-as-medicine and traditional remedies.
The new era of paid influencers quietly pushing pharmaceutical talking points while attacking natural health – often without disclosure.
Why attempts to smear, censor and exile natural health voices have actually accelerated a grassroots movement towards lifestyle-based, regenerative approaches to health.
If you care about the freedom to choose sunlight, turmeric, cherries or broccoli over a lifetime of polypharmacy – and about your right to decide what goes into your body – this interview will both validate your concerns and leave you hopeful.
🎥 Watch the full conversation above, then let me know in the comments below.
Joining the growing movement to take back control of one’s health destiny and secure health freedom for generations to come. Learn how you can empower yourself by joining Stand For Health Freedom and the Global Wellness Forum.
Back in 1994 Dr Meriel Watts wrote in her book The Poisoning of New Zealand*, of constant phone calls to the Soil & Health Assn by folk asking … “Is 1080 safe & do I have to let them drop it on my property?” The Association’s view at the time she said was ‘no’ and ‘no’. Soil & Health’s submission to the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s Possum Management review stated that “the current practice of distributing by air large amounts of 1080-laced carrot and pollard baits over large areas has lead to unacceptable risks to the environment, human health, dogs, farm stock, birds and other members of the ecosystem.” (p 186, 187).
That submission cited various incidents experienced by farmers.
“In one case a South Island farm lost 570 ewes when 1080 was dropped in his pastures as a result of the helicopter swinging too wide when dropping over bush patches. His sheep were still dying up to six months later; there were also a large number of abortions.” (Dr M Watts, p 187)
“In another case … a central North Island farmer came home to find 1080 spread all over her farm and around her house. There was a nice sign stating this fact, but no prior notification and no prior permission given. Fortunately her dogs were locked up.” (Dr M Watts, p 187)
We seldom of course hear of these incidents as they are not normally featured by mainstream media. It has been highlighted via the GrafBoys’ information that these stats are actually hidden in the paper work.
Farmers, when claiming compensation, are required to list that compensation as for purposes other than poisoned stock losses.
Please read the comments at this link (previous post) where a farmer shares about the loss of his dogs to likely 1080 poisoning. “MAF and DOC hushed it up pretty quick” he said.
See tv-wild.co.nz also for further info from the GrafBoys. Watch the video on topic at their Youtube channel here.
*The Poisoning of New Zealand by Dr Meriel Watts, Ak Institute of Technology Press, 1994
Image by Roman Solar from Pixabay (note, not the actual farm or farmer in the article).
“Smartphone ownership at age 12 is associated with higher depression risk, increased obesity risk, and a greater likelihood of insufficient sleep. The younger people acquire smartphones, the worse their health outcomes become, a pattern that continues affecting health throughout the lifespan.“
(NaturalHealth365) Walk through any public space and the scene repeats everywhere: babies in strollers staring at glowing screens, teenagers unable to look up from their devices, and adults compulsively checking phones every few minutes. What began as a convenient communication tool has become a constant companion that most people interact with for well over 4 hours daily, rarely questioning what this exposure is doing to bodies and brains at every age.
A major study published in Pediatrics, analyzing over 10,000 adolescents, has delivered results that extend far beyond childhood concerns. Smartphone ownership at age 12 is associated with higher depression risk, increased obesity risk, and a greater likelihood of insufficient sleep. The younger people acquire smartphones, the worse their health outcomes become, a pattern that continues affecting health throughout the lifespan.
Hidden health crisis emerging at every age, study data confirms
Researchers from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study followed 10,588 participants, comparing health outcomes between 12-year-olds who owned smartphones (6,739 children) and those who didn’t (3,849 children). Depression risk increased by 31%, obesity risk jumped 40%, and insufficient sleep risk climbed 62% compared to children without smartphones.
The age at which someone gets their first smartphone shows a troubling trend: for every year earlier a child receives one, their risk of obesity increases by 9% and their risk of inadequate sleep rises by 8%. Early smartphone exposure appears to set long-lasting patterns that continue into adulthood.
Among youth who didn’t own smartphones at age 12, those who acquired devices during the following year had 57% higher odds of clinical-level psychopathology and a 50% higher likelihood of insufficient sleep, even after controlling for baseline mental health and sleep patterns.
But children aren’t the only ones affected. Adults spending excessive time on smartphones show similar health deterioration: disrupted sleep architecture, increased anxiety and depression, sedentary behavior contributing to metabolic dysfunction, and postural problems causing chronic pain.
Alarming cancer connection scientists can no longer ignore
Smartphones emit radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, raising serious questions about cancer risk across the lifespan. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” based on increased glioma risk associated with wireless phone use.
Children’s developing brains absorb more radiation than adult brains. Research published in Environmental Research found that children’s brains absorb 2-3 times more radiation than adults’, and the young, thin skull’s bone marrow absorbs roughly 10 times higher local doses. But adults face cumulative exposure risks. Someone who started using cell phones at age 15 and continues through age 65 accumulates 50 years of daily radiation exposure.
France has banned Wi-Fi in nursery schools and limited it in elementary schools, and Belgium has outlawed marketing phones to children under age 7. Yet despite these precautions, smartphone use continues to rise across all age groups, with very little discussion of the potential long-term health effects.
Simple strategies to protect yourself from device-related damage
Protecting yourself and your family from the health impacts of heavy smartphone use takes some intentional habits, but small shifts make a big difference.
Cut back on daily exposure: Instead of being “always on,” choose specific times to check your phone. Use built-in screen-time tools to set limits and create phone-free zones, like during meals, before bed, or when you’re spending time with others.
Lower radiation exposure: Use a speakerphone or a wired headset rather than holding the phone against your head. Turn off Wi-Fi and cellular data when you don’t need them, and avoid sleeping with your phone next to you. When you can, switch your device to airplane mode.
Reduce physical strain: Give your body breaks. Step away from screens regularly to undo the stress on your posture they cause. Simple stretches can help reverse “tech neck” and tight shoulders. If you’re sitting for long periods, stand and move at least every 30 minutes.
Protect your sleep: Keep screens out of the bedroom. Try to stop scrolling at least two hours before bed, so your body can naturally produce melatonin. If nighttime screen use is unavoidable, blue-light-blocking glasses can help.
Support detox pathways: Lower your overall toxic load by eating clean, staying hydrated, and moving your body daily. You can also support liver function and cellular repair with targeted supplements if needed.
Understand the cancer prevention connection
Chronic inflammation, disrupted circadian rhythms, electromagnetic field exposure, and sedentary behavior all contribute to disease processes, including cancer. These risk factors accumulate over decades of smartphone use.
Jonathan Landsman’s Stop Cancer Docu-Class brings together 22 holistic experts, researchers, doctors, and nutritionists, revealing evidence-based approaches to cancer prevention. Learn how environmental toxins and electromagnetic field exposure affect cancer risk, which lab tests detect early cancer markers years before conventional diagnosis, natural protocols for strengthening immune surveillance against abnormal cell growth, and how reducing toxic burden and supporting detoxification pathways lowers cancer risk.
Bottom line: Smartphone use harms health at every age, damaging mental health, disrupting metabolism and sleep, and exposing users to radiation that accumulates over time. Getting smartphones younger makes everything worse, but adults who’ve used phones for decades face their own serious risks. Protect your long-term health by cutting back on usage, keeping phones away from your body, and supporting your body’s ability to detoxify and repair cellular damage.
For months, many Floridians believed the state had finally put an end to suspicious aerial spraying after political statements suggested Florida was “banning chemtrails.” Governor Ron DeSantis and Senator Ileana Garcia spoke publicly about stopping geoengineering, giving the impression that skies would soon clear.
However, the recently enacted Senate Bill 56 (SB 56), which officially took effect July 1, 2025, tells a different story. While the law strengthens regulations on geoengineering and weather modification, it does not address all the aerial activity residents report seeing daily. In other words, the “ban” on chemtrails is far from what many expected.
What SB 56 actually covers
SB 56 prohibits any person or corporation from injecting, releasing, or dispersing chemicals, compounds, or other substances into the atmosphere in Florida with the explicit purpose of affecting temperature, weather, climate, or sunlight intensity. Violations carry steep penalties:
Individuals or corporations: fines up to $100,000
Aircraft operators: fines up to $5,000 and up to 5 years in prison
Funds collected from penalties are directed to the Air Pollution Control Trust Fund, used solely for environmental control purposes.
The law also allows residents to report observed violations, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) must:
Accept reports online, by phone, mail, or email
Investigate reports requiring review
Refer potential violations to the Department of Health or Division of Emergency Management if appropriate
Adopt rules necessary to implement these procedures
Airports must report monthly to the Florida Department of Transportation any aircraft equipped for weather-modifying purposes. These reports are then submitted to DEP and law enforcement for enforcement support.
SB 56 also repeals outdated weather modification licensing laws from the 1950s, which previously allowed certain operations under strict permits. The law now prohibits these activities outright rather than regulating them through licensing.
Why Floridians are concerned
Despite the new law, residents across the state report seeing persistent aerial spraying patterns, grids, and unusual streaks in the sky. Many feel misled after believing the “ban” would prevent this activity.
Clearly, political statements can create the illusion of action, even when the law does not directly address all concerns.
Public figures are speaking out
Even celebrities have weighed in. World-famous comedian Jim Breuer, a Florida resident and former Saturday Night Live cast member, recently spoke about these aerial phenomena in a viral video. Millions of viewers relate to what he describes and are asking for accountability.
Watch Jim Breuer’s video here:
The law does not stop what residents are seeing
SB 56 focuses on formal geoengineering or weather modification operations. It does not cover all aerial activity residents report, and enforcement relies on DEP investigations based on submitted reports.
In short, residents remain in the dark about what is occurring above their communities.
Natural solutions to protect your body
While the cause of Florida’s hazy skies remains debated, one thing is sure: your body’s detox pathways are constantly working to process whatever you breathe, eat, and absorb. Strengthening those pathways with simple, natural practices can reduce your overall toxic burden and support long-term wellness.
Start with the basics: prioritize clean indoor air by using HEPA filtration, opening windows when outdoor air quality is good, and adding air-purifying plants like spider plants or peace lilies.
Hydration is essential for your liver and lymphatic system, so aim for filtered water throughout the day.
Organic nutrient-rich foods, especially cruciferous vegetables, herbs like parsley and cilantro, and fiber from fruits and vegetables, help your body process and eliminate environmental pollutants more efficiently.
Supporting your liver is one of the most effective steps you can take. Gentle practices like castor oil packs, dry brushing, regular movement, sauna use (far infrared or conventional), and adequate sleep all help your detox organs function optimally. Even small daily habits can make a meaningful difference when done consistently.
Take action: Make your voice heard
If you live in Florida, you have the right to demand clarity, transparency, and accountability. The correct office to contact is: Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) – Public Information Office: 850-245-2118
Ask them:
What is happening in our skies?
Are any weather modification or geoengineering activities currently occurring?
How is SB 56 being enforced?
When will Floridians see the skies clear?
The more residents who call, the more pressure officials feel to respond publicly and transparently. Your voice can drive change, ensure oversight, and demand accountability for activities in Florida’s atmosphere.
Your body is taking the hit – Here’s how to fight back
If you’ve been wondering how to protect your body from the daily onslaught of environmental toxins and support your natural detox pathways, there’s a simple, proven solution.
Get access to Jonathan Landsman’s Whole Body Detox Summit, featuring the latest strategies from 27 holistic experts, researchers, and nutritionists, all at your fingertips. With complete access to all episodes, bonus content, and easy-to-use transcripts and audio files, you can start reducing your toxic burden today and take control of your health like never before.
“Investigative reporter Asra Nomani revealed a sprawling global network pushing governments toward permissive, industrial-scale euthanasia.
Her findings are alarming:
15,000 Canadians died via assisted suicide in 2023, now the 5th leading cause of death in the country.The Netherlands and Belgium routinely approve euthanasia for mental illness, minor children, and even newborn infants deemed to have “unbearable suffering.”Dutch law already allows doctors to kill children as young as one year old, with activists pushing to lower the age even further.The Dutch model has become the globalists’ blueprint, and now they’re racing to dismantle the final legal barriers. America is not far behind.”
Dutch Government Moves to Lift All Restrictions on Euthanasia
The Dutch government is taking a stunning step toward fully decriminalizing euthanasia, preparing to eliminate the last remaining restrictions on state-sanctioned assisted suicide after a lobbying blitz from far-left activist groups.
Dutch media reports confirm that Parliament will now debate a proposal that would allow unrestricted, open-ended euthanasia, turning the Netherlands into one of the most radical death regimes on Earth.
A petition demanding full legalization surpassed the required 75,000 signatures and is backed by the NGO Stichting Levenseinderegie (the End-of-Life Self-Direction Foundation).
The far-left group led by psychologist-turned-euthanasia evangelist Wim van Dijk.
The NGO openly campaigns for a future in which virtually anyone, regardless of medical condition, age, or circumstance, can receive state-approved suicide on demand.
Globalist Death Model Spreading Worldwide
The Netherlands already legalized euthanasia in 2002, but with guardrails, at least on paper.
Those limits required physician approval, certain qualifying conditions, and safeguards.
However, critics have been warning that those “safeguards” were a façade, and they were right.
Now, activists and radical lawmakers from the left-wing Democrats 66 (D66) party are preparing to introduce legislation next session that would strip away the remaining restrictions entirely.
The timing is no coincidence.
The Netherlands has seen explosive growth in state-sanctioned deaths.
In 2025 alone, the government killed a staggering 10,000 Dutch residents via euthanasia, according to DutchNews.
However, experts warn the real number may be far higher.
Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition says the Dutch government doesn’t even report all euthanasia deaths.
In a government-commissioned review, investigators uncovered:
That last category means over 500 people were euthanized without asking for it, a fact that should chill anyone who believes human life has value.
A Worldwide Industry of Engineered Death
Investigative reporter Asra Nomani exposed what she calls “Assisted Suicide Inc.”
Nomani revealed a sprawling global network pushing governments toward permissive, industrial-scale euthanasia.
Her findings are alarming:
• 15,000 Canadians died via assisted suicide in 2023, now the 5th leading cause of death in the country.
• The Netherlands and Belgium routinely approve euthanasia for mental illness, minor children, and even newborn infants deemed to have “unbearable suffering.”
• Dutch law already allows doctors to kill children as young as one year old, with activists pushing to lower the age even further.
The Dutch model has become the globalists’ blueprint, and now they’re racing to dismantle the final legal barriers.
America Is Not Far Behind
While Europe accelerates this march toward state-managed death, the United States is also experiencing a wave of pro-euthanasia legislation:
Illinois is pushing to legalize physician-assisted suicide.
Montana and New York are considering similar bills.
Oregon reported 376 assisted suicides in 2024, a number that grows every year.
Once a fringe idea, euthanasia is now becoming a mainstream policy priority among Western left-wing governments, and activists aren’t stopping until death becomes a “service,” not a last resort.
Chilling Direction for the West
Critics warn the Netherlands is now openly embracing a culture where:
The push to completely decriminalize euthanasia marks the most extreme step yet, signaling a grim future where state-sanctioned death is treated as a “right,” a “solution,” and ultimately, a weapon.
Slay News will continue tracking the debate as the Dutch Parliament prepares to consider one of the most radical euthanasia expansions in modern history.
EWNZ comment: Where is NZ up to in this? Wikipedia reports that“Euthanasia became legal in New Zealand when the End of Life Choice Act 2019 took full effect on 7 November 2021. “ One wonders, given the scenarios one hears about these days of experiences folk are having in hospitals with their loved ones, if this is not already in effect albeit informally. “We can’t do any more for your family member” and Morphine is administered along with Midazolam ‘to keep them comfortable’ until they pass. My elderly neighbour, no relatives nearby, was treated periodically for a few years prior with occasional hospital admissions, then suddenly, ‘we can’t do any more’ (aka I suspect, he has reached his financial limit) followed by 3 choices … home with home help, a care home nearby or hospice. He chose hospice, dear man, and whilst I visited him there for his remaining 2 weeks of life, I noted brochures at the foyer indicating more hospices were being built in his nearby home town‘because of the aging population’. Note, hospices used to be for terminal folk, not aging folk. I smelled a rat right then. Call me suspicious, I don’t care, but old folk usually went to care homes when they couldn’t live independently, not to hospices. Then there is the Liverpool Care Pathway (see here also). Nil by mouth. That is the ‘care’ they administer. It’s stopped we’re told but I’ve heard of folk receiving this treatment in NZ. We need to stay vigilant and not leave our loved ones alone in hospital.
“…any existence of a relationship between Covid vaccination and all-cause mortality in the absence of Covid infection should have been a red flag…”
expose-news comment: Due to his expertise, Dr. Guy Hatchard was invited to correspond with senior government advisors before the Covid vaccine rollout in New Zealand. By the end of October 2021, he was excluded entirely from email interaction with government advisors. “My input was cancelled,” he said.
Dr. Hatchard requested a meeting with the Royal Commissioners of New Zealand’s covid inquiry, “I was in a unique position to offer invaluable information to the Commission.” His request was denied.
The Commissioners are now preparing their report. To set the record straight and make a “sincere attempt to serve the needs of justice,” Dr. Hatchard has written an open letter to the Commissioners.
The following is an open letter written by Dr. Hatchard to the Royal Commissioners on Covid-19 Lessons Learned, Phase 2.
Dear Grant Illingworth KC and fellow Commissioners
I understand from your latest panui that you are currently assessing the evidence you have gathered in order to prepare your final report. Although the Hatchard Report submitted evidence to the Commission, our request for a meeting with yourselves was not granted. As I was in a unique position to offer invaluable information to the Commission, I believe an opportunity was missed. I would like to set the record straight in a last-minute, sincere attempt to serve the needs of justice.
In March 2021, immediately prior to the Covid vaccine rollout, I was personally invited to correspond with senior individuals who had been appointed to advise the government. These included a leading epidemiologist, a well-known business leader and a member of the Skegg Committee. My academic background includes the use of sophisticated time series analysis to test for causal factors in social and economic data. My early input was well received. For example, Professor Michael Baker replied to one of my comments:
“Thank you for that very lucid description of our current state of knowledge around Covid-19 and the uncertainties – which are large. I agree about the importance of trying to keep an open, evidence-informed debate about future options.”
I was well aware that mRNA vaccine technology was both novel and already well recognised in the scientific literature to involve unique risks. Early on, I took advantage of my contacts in the global biotechnology research sector to gather advice about these risks and to find out more about Covid origins.
There was a consensus among my contacts, who were actively doing research on genetic medicine, that Covid originated in a laboratory, but there was a reluctance to go public with this information for fear of losing their position. It was also apparent that, despite the known risks of mRNA vaccination technology, there was a reluctance to dismiss its use, rather my contacts believed the severity of the early variants circulating overseas dictated that Covid vaccination should be a matter of informed personal choice.
In other words, the risks should be a matter of public knowledge and discussion, and the effects of vaccination should be deeply researched and assessed. This was the extent of my understanding as my correspondence with government advisors commenced – I believed we should err on the side of caution. Government policy was keeping Covid out of the country, which could have bought us time to assess the safety of the vaccine as it was used overseas before we rolled it out here in NZ. In the pressured atmosphere of the early pandemic, this opportunity was missed.
It immediately became apparent to me that because NZ was almost completely free of Covid infection, due primarily to border controls, contact tracing and social isolation measures, we were in a unique position to assess any effects of the novel mRNA vaccine in the absence of confounding factors related to Covid infection. No other country in the world had this opportunity to the degree NZ enjoyed. Therefore, I took the responsibility of my contact with senior government advisors very seriously indeed. As the vaccine rollout began, I monitored published scientific papers on Covid and used my data skills to assess any vaccine effects.
Early on, I pointed out that lifestyle factors including diet and exercise, and alternative medical strategies to combat comorbidities could critically affect Covid outcomes and should be a factor in government policy to ensure a satisfactory long-term public health outcome.
But over the second quarter of 2021, as the vaccine rollout gathered pace, my correspondence with government advisors revealed that there was an overwhelming consensus that vaccination would contain Covid, despite the fact that overseas Covid data was not supporting this contention. By July a number of studies and assessments in the USA and Israel (with 59% of the population vaccinated at the time) revealed that Covid vaccination did not stop transmission and that any effectiveness at preventing hospitalisation fell dramatically within 10 weeks of vaccination and disappeared entirely within 180 days.
The reaction of the government team was instructive. A member of the Skegg Committee wrote to me suggesting that Covid was being spread in the general population by children who, at that stage, were not yet vaccinated. This suggestion did not have any supporting data; it merely reflected a predetermined policy to get everyone vaccinated as soon as possible. I wrote back, warning about the dangers of an overconfidence in Covid vaccination that did not fit the actual data.
In August, a preprint paper reported that the natural immunity acquired through Covid infection was 13 times more effective at preventing reinfection than Covid vaccination in the absence of prior infection. I circulated this among government advisors. The Skegg Committee member wrote back:
“A protective immune signature is often elusive and vaccines are actually quite primitive in design, and often don’t need to be anything other than that. For covid vaccination, we are actually still in the first generation and there will be lots of improvements – to dosing, dose interval, boosting and adjusting for variants. The fact that one has to give them to everyone to protect the few from falling victim (death) is unlikely to ever change I wouldn’t have thought. And the chances of other ‘interventions’ having anything like their protective effect is remote in my view.”
In other words, even though data was showing that mRNA Covid shots were not proving effective, there was such a deep-seated faith in the principle of vaccination that the actual data and the novel nature of mRNA vaccines was being ignored in the expectation that vaccine developers would get it right in the end. But by September, it became clear that the data showed Covid vaccination was not preventing deaths. I emailed the government team:
“I ran a linear regression for 190 countries between percentage of the population vaccinated and deaths per million during the last seven days. There is no significant correlation (+0.034) … I believe this points to a general principle that: it is factors and policies other than vaccination which primarily affect outcomes in a nation. Determining those factors is critical in understanding the pandemic and its possible solutions. From this point of view I am increasingly of the opinion that the current government messaging is becoming misleading. The majority emphasis on vaccination targets is giving the impression that a high level of vaccination alone will guarantee freedom from Covid.”
My early correlation finding was subsequently supported by a published study. The Skegg Committee member wrote back to me:
“I think you are right that studies have also shown that high vaccine coverage will not alone contain outbreaks. And that, given our still low 2-dose vaccine coverage, we are presently in a very risky situation.”
In other words, in his opinion, the solution to the lack of Covid vaccine effectiveness was more frequent mRNA vaccination. This did not appear to make sense, especially as reports of high rates of vaccine adverse effects were multiplying. Studies were beginning to be published showing that the risk of Covid infection for younger age groups was very low but the risk of adverse effects of Covid vaccination might be higher. These were red flags which were being ignored here in New Zealand.
In October, I received a reply from the Skegg committee member to my concerns about a teenage girl who had died suddenly following Covid vaccination. He dismissed this as a likely adverse effect of the oral contraceptive, not a possible effect of Covid vaccination. I raised other similar cases of sudden death following Covid vaccination but by the end of October, I was excluded entirely from email interaction with government advisors. My input was cancelled. By this time, the government was set on a policy of vaccine mandates, despite the growing evidence of harm. Universal Covid vaccine mandates for some professions and movement restrictions on the unvaccinated were extended during November. At this point, I believed there was an overwhelming public interest to raise my voice, to go public with my concerns and put analysis of NZ Covid data on a scientific footing.
Data for weekly all-cause deaths by age was available. Weekly Covid vaccine totals by age were being announced. It was therefore possible to undertake a time series analysis to determine whether increases in vaccine rates were followed by increases in deaths. I undertook this analysis for the 60+ age cohort. I compared weekly vaccination numbers in New Zealand with weekly deaths (all causes) for the 60+ age group between 7 March 2021 and 31 October 2021. This period corresponded to the exclusive rollout of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. There were very few cases of Covid-19 active in the community during this period and therefore the effect of the Pfizer Covid vaccination could be studied largely free of the confounding factors of Covid deaths. My time series analysis found a positive effect of vaccination on deaths (all causes) at a lag of one week (t(33) = 1.74, p = 0.045 one-tailed). Tests showed the results cannot be plausibly attributed to spurious regression due to nonstationarity. The analysis found that vaccination was associated with 434 additional all-cause deaths during the week following vaccination among individuals aged 60+. This age cohort received a total of 2.8 million vaccine doses during the experimental period. The finding of additional deaths is roughly consistent with available reports of all cause deaths proximate to vaccination that were reported. The full text of the analysis is available at Research Gate.
There are limitations to this analysis. There is no doubt that the collection of vaccination totals by week would have been to an unknown extent subject to haphazard data collection and recording due to the rush involved, but any existence of a relationship between Covid vaccination and all-cause mortality in the absence of Covid infection should have been a red flag. Moreover, the possible association should have been obvious even to a casual observer of the above graph which was widely publicised at the time and fully available to those in government and the medical establishment who should have been assessing the possible effects of the Covid vaccine rollout.
These alarming health statistics result from some key mistakes that were made in the early years of the pandemic that could have been avoided, which I summarise as follows:
A. There was a failure to take account of the known character and depth of the serious risks posed by novel genetic interventions as used by the Covid vaccines. The adverse outcomes of past gene therapy trials and the results of prior animal studies were ignored. Warnings of some internationally prominent microbiologists were wrongly dismissed as conspiracy theories.
B. Instead, authorities followed a policy which naively and wrongly assumed the risks and possible adverse effects of mRNA vaccines were similar to prior traditional vaccines. In this way, they limited the number and type of conditions which might conceivably be related to Covid vaccination. They dismissed as unrelated, high rates of red flag adverse vaccine reactions including neurological effects, kidney damage, immune deficiency, psychological effects, cardiac issues and sudden deaths which were occurring at unprecedented high frequencies.
C. The absence of any studies of the longer-term effects of Covid vaccines should have led to rigorous pharmacovigilance monitoring. Instead authorities assumed that any adverse effects would only surface during the first 21-30 days following vaccination, thus crippling their potential to assess and understand potential Covid vaccine outcomes, including cancers. Border controls and contact tracing largely excluded Covid infection in NZ during 2021, giving NZ a unique opportunity to assess the effects of Covid vaccination in isolation from Covid infection. This opportunity was lost.
D. Authorities actively sought to suppress and discredit those asking questions and raising concerns on both local and international platforms, including valid scientific results and discussions. They made repeated public assurances of safety and efficacy in the face of contrary evidence and sought to control media and social media content and discussions, apparently in order to suppress Covid vaccine hesitancy. They severely disciplined doctors offering informed consent.
F. In assessing the massive volume of scientific publishing on Covid-19 which runs to many more than 100,000 papers, there was a failure to take account of the known hierarchy of evidence. The results of prospective studies, time series analysis, studies of large populations, studies comparing outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated populations and studies examining longer-term outcomes should have taken precedence. If this had been followed, dangers would have been apparent and problems averted.
G. As time went by and evidence of harm in the population both here and overseas began to accumulate, authorities attempted to limit access to key NZ source data, especially concerning specific parameters such as vaccine status, cardiac disease, cancer, excess mortality, etc. Those figures that remained accessible or were leaked painted a very grim picture of accelerating ill health since 2020, which continues to be ignored by Health NZ or erroneously blamed on factors that have remained largely unchanged since 2020. Yet it has become ever clearer that the rate of Covid vaccine injuries reported to CARM is only the very tip of the iceberg. A Covid death whistle-blower Barry Young is still facing prosecution. Doctors raising questions about Covid vaccines are still being censored.
It is apparent that long-term public health outcomes have been harmed by the combination of Covid infection and vaccination. Both of these almost certainly resulted from biotechnology experimentation. The failure of the government and Health NZ to come to grips with the implications of the health data needs to be exposed and discussed publicly. Your role as Commissioners requires a full examination of the scientific data that has been so far ignored here in NZ. I remain available to discuss these issues, they are within the Commission’s terms of reference. They should not be omitted from your final report. This is a matter directly affecting public health and longevity.
Yours sincerely Guy Hatchard PhD, 1 December 2025
Guy Hatchard, PhD, Biography
Guy Hatchard is the creator and principal contributor to the Hatchard Report. He has been a life-long advocate of food safety. He was formerly Director of Natural Products at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification company now known as FoodChain ID. Genetic ID developed techniques to test for the presence of genetically modified organisms in food and provided services to bulk food trading companies like ADM, Cargill, and many others in order to facilitate access to export markets and increase consumer trust. He has presented his findings to governments and industry leaders around the world. He appeared before the NZ Royal Commission on Genetic Modification and has been a key figure in discussions since 2017 which eventually led to the repeal of the Natural Products Bill. He has written a book Your DNA Diet which is available from Amazon.
He received his BSc Hons. from the University of Sussex, UK, in Logic and Theoretical Physics with a special focus on the scientific method. He qualified with a Certificate in Teaching from Canterbury Teachers College, Christchurch. His MA thesis at Maharishi International University (MIU), Iowa, analysed outcomes of mastery learning in Mathematics. His PhD thesis in Psychology at MIU investigated the impact of human factors on national competitive advantage using time series analysis. Maharishi International University (MIU) is fully accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) which is recognised by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). It incorporates principles of consciousness-based education (CBE). CBE includes traditional subjects while also cultivating the student’s potential from within. He has published papers in peer reviewed journals and was the keynote speaker at the 1996 annual conference of the British Psychological Society on Crime.
I did not know this until I ran across a post on X, but come December 27, 2025, every internet search any person makes will require Digital ID verification before it can be completed.
If the search engine provider fails to check for your ID, they face a $50 million fine. For each “breach” of the law.
Needless to say, I am pretty sure that search engines will comply with the law.
Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.
Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.
At the end of June, Australia quietly introduced rules forcing companies such as Google and Microsoft to check the ages of logged-in users, in an effort to limit children’s access to harmful content such as pornography.
But experts have warned the move could compromise Australians’ privacy online and may not do much to protect young people.
“I have not seen anything like this anywhere else in the world,” said Lisa Given, professor of Information Sciences from RMIT, who specialises in age-assurance technology.
“As people learn about the implications of this, we will likely see people stepping up and saying, ‘Wait a minute, why wasn’t I told that this was going to happen?’”
From December 27, Google — which dominates the Australian search market with a share of more than 90 per cent — and its rival, Microsoft, will have to use some form of age-assurance technology on users when they sign in, or face fines of almost $50 million per breach.
The search results for logged-in users under the age of 18 will be filtered for pornography, high-impact violence, material promoting eating disorders and a range of other content.
Despite the apparent magnitude of the shift, it has mostly gone unnoticed, in stark contrast to the political and media fanfare surrounding the teen social media ban, which will block under-16s from major platforms using similar technology.
It’s for the children, you see. Because of course it is. Everything is for the children.
Back in 2020, in a video which was censored and removed almost before it appeared I warned that the conspirators wanted to starve us and freeze us to death. The video was called `They’re going to starve us and freeze us to death’ and it was published on the 1st July 2020. (You can read the transcript in my book `Covid-19: The Greatest Hoax in History’.)
That was the plan then.
And it is still the plan. It is the reason why energy and food prices and soaring and why food supplies are becoming scarcer. Remember, nothing bad is happening by accident.
Starvation is being created quite deliberately as part of the plan to reduce the world’s population.
Encouraged by cultist-controlled politicians, vast quantities of the world’s crops of corn, soy bean and so on, are being used to make biofuels so that motorists can continue to buy cheap petrol for their motor cars. A while ago, a list of 51 things you and I can do to prevent global warming was published. Number 1 on their list was headed ‘Turn food into fuel’. This, it was claimed, would have a ‘high impact’ on the global warming problem. It was suggested that ethanol is the alternative fuel that ‘could finally wean the US from its expensive oil habit and in turn prevent the millions of tons of carbon emissions that go with it.’
This is dangerous nonsense. When more land is used to grow biofuels, so that ‘green’ motorists can drive around feeling virtuous, there is less land for growing food and an increase in the number of people starving to death.
The demand for biofuels has been soaring for years (despite the knowledge that, as a result, people are starving) and the increased use of biofuel is a major force behind the rise of food prices. If greens keep promoting biofuels then there is going to be a global shortage of food and millions more are going to die as a result.
There are other problems with our food supplies, of course.
Big American seed companies have been busy patenting the rights to many individual seeds. They have done this so that they can force farmers around the world to buy their products. One result has been that small farmers in India are no longer allowed to grow seeds from crops that their families have been planting for generations. If they do, then lawyers for American multinationals will smother them with writs and injunctions.
As a result, the incidence of suicide among small farmers in developing countries is terrifyingly high.
Finally, large modern farms are remarkably (and surprisingly) inefficient. When the fuel used to build tractors, make fertilisers and pesticides and so on is taken into account, it turns out that the energy cost of a kilogram of corn has actually risen in the last few decades. Soil erosion, the loss of pollinators (such as bees) who have been killed by chemicals, evolving chemical resistance by pests and numerous other environmental problems have also reduced farm crops.
The result of all this is that food is becoming scarce and prices are rising. This is not a cyclical change (with prices falling or rising due to changes in the weather). It is a structural change and it is, I fear, permanent.
As far as food prices are concerned, the conditions really are optimum for a ‘perfect storm’. At first glance it appears that things really couldn’t get much worse.
But, actually, they could.
Governments everywhere are preventing people growing their own food, keeping chickens or trying to look after themselves. They don’t want citizens to be independent.
Taxation systems are being used to discourage farmers and the number of farms is disappearing rapidly. In the UK, 13,000 farms have just disappeared and the average British farmer is 59 years old because young people see no future in growing food. `I don’t know what’s wrong with the Government,’ said one naïve farmer earlier this week. `It’s almost as they’re trying to get rid of farmers and close down all the farms.’
Extraordinarily, most farmers have no idea what is going on. Around the world, farmers still assume that they’re dealing with incompetence rather than a malignant conspiracy to destroy everything we hold dear. Farming, health care, energy supplies, education, transport and the economy are all being systematically and deliberately destroyed to take us through Net Zero into the terrifying Great Reset.
`You will own nothing and be happy,’ isn’t just a slogan. It’s the future they have planned for us.
Food rationing takes place more often than people realise. Supermarkets carry three to five days of stock and every slight problem leads to shortages. In 2010 there were 61 food banks in the UK – today there are 2,500 and that isn’t enough. And the UK is supposedly the sixth richest country in the world. Rickets and scurvy are coming back and there is a malnutrition crisis. Millions eat nothing but junk and there is an obesity crisis too. The National Health Service in the UK spends £6.5 billion a year on obesity. Doctors and politicians want more people to be given weight loss drugs which I consider too dangerous to be used as landfill. Naturally, no one agrees with me (though as the side effects become apparent a few people are noticing that there is a huge price to pay for a jab that helps you lose weight without the pain of dieting). Meanwhile, only the wealthiest can afford decent food.
Re-wilding schemes are used to make farming impractical or impossible. Forever chemicals are put into our food to poison us. There are hormones in beef and chlorine in chickens. Even the packaging is dangerous. Would you believe it? (You should). They’re poisoning our air, our water and our food and they’ve even poisoning the damned packaging. It would be easier for them to just shoot us all but they’d have to pay for the bullets. This way we poison ourselves.
American genetic engineers have been ‘modifying’ food for years to make it more profitable. No one knows what effect their modifications will have on the safety of food for human consumption. No one knows what other horrendous side effects there might be. The risks are unbelievably dangerous. So, for example, if every farmer in the world grows the same ‘brand’ of potato and that potato is hit by a deadly disease then there won’t be any potatoes.
For those in Europe and America all this is not yet quite critical.
But for those in many other parts of the world this is already an outright disaster. In some countries nearly half of all children are malnourished. And things are getting worse and will continue to get worse. Rising prices and falling quantities of food available for eating (as opposed to filling petrol tanks) will result in massive starvation around the world. The fake coronavirus hoax, and the consequent economic problems which will devastate economies everywhere, will exacerbate the problem. As a result, the incidence of global starvation is set to rocket.
It’s no good saying that the planet isn’t overcrowded (it isn’t) or that there is plenty of food (there is), for the inescapable fact is that as a result of policies controlled by international organisations controlled by the United States of America, at least five million infants and small children die each year – in a good year. That figure is set to rocket in India, Nigeria and the Congo and elsewhere. The number of people in extreme poverty around the world could soon double to over 200 million.
The racist and elitist policies of the climate change enthusiasts who want us to stop using oil will, if they are successful, be responsible for billions of deaths. And, of course, as I have repeatedly warned, spraying chemicals into the sky to block the sun is making things far, far worse.
The billionaires assume that they know best about everything (because they are rich) and that the end always justifies the means. Their arrogance has also helped them become ever richer. In the last two decades billions of dollars have moved from the middle classes to the billionaire classes. Real wages have been falling and the value of savings, investments and pensions has fallen steadily while the billionaires have got ever richer. It is difficult to avoid the feeling that the conspirators have for years now been on a very effective mission to destroy American and Europe from within.
The unavoidable truth is that everything needs energy and without energy everything stops. The climate change believers have pushed energy costs ever higher and if they are able to understand even the simplest scientific evidence, they must know that renewables will never replace carbon based fuels. However, it is largely thanks to the efforts of bankers and politicians that capital spending on fossil fuels has fallen dramatically and fuel production has dropped 30% since 2020.
The bottom line is that disaster is closer than most people imagine.
NOTE The above essay is based on Vernon Coleman’s book `Their Terrifying Plan’.
Please be aware that because of constant censorship, some of the links and citations are listed in their full titles and full URL’s, so I can try to find them again if the censors hide them. Thank you for reading. Enjoy. If you want to get more articles like this, get on my private email list by emailing me personally at jason@freedomfromselfsabotage.com
1. A pesticide common in the 1800’s was called Paris Green. A green liquid because it was a combination of copper and arsenic or lead and arsenic. Some of the most toxic substances known to humankind. This super toxin was also used as a dye, in many items, including wall paper and paint. It was the sole focus of murder mystery novels at the time, as arsenic was known to be a very efficient way to stage a murder “for unknown reasons”, as arsenic kills but is hard to detect after the victim succumbs to the poison (now we’ve had to add this link because the first link has been scrubbed – Scheele’s Green – Wikipedia. – An Everyday Poison | Science History InstituteScience History Stories Magazine Every Day Poison Arsenic
2. This pesticide worked by causing neurological damage in the bugs, causing organ failure.
3. Polio consists of symptoms synonymous with neurological damage, causing organ failure.
4. Heavy metal poisoning from lead, mercury and other similar heavy metals manifest lesions on neurological tissues, meaning the toxin destroys the nerve/communication pathways connecting the brain to the organs in the body. http://bit.ly/1OLcFgG (Mercury Poisoning – The Minamata Story)
5. Polio victims present lesions on neurological tissue, that cause the organs to malfunction all around the body. (lungs, heart, nerves that control walking etc)
6. Polio outbreaks hit throughout the summer, only during pesticide spraying times. (not the sunless and damp winter/spring seasons regarding other disease outbreaks)
8. Parents reported finding their children paralyzed in and around apple orchards. One of the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops of the time (with lead arsenate or copper arsenate) were apple orchards. Paris green – Wikipedia Both lead and arsenate can cause paralysis but that paralysis is tied to visible poisons, not invisible viruses. Imagine a plot to continually poison the public for control based purposes and to have the public focus on invisible viruses and not the visible poisons? How far would such a plot get? Is such a plot still occurring to this very day, using the same strategies and blue prints?
9. President Roosevelt became paralyzed over night while at a summer retreat, which contained many crops, including apple orchards.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paralytic_illness_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt He also swam the day prior in a bay that was heavily polluted by industrial agricultural run off. Summer again is when these paralysis based outbreaks would occur, as spraying of crops with extremely toxic chemicals would intensify as the crops hit a fully mature state. The pesticides we’re talking about were DESIGNED to terminate nervous system function in the bugs, which is exactly what “polio presents as. Is polio connected to a very long history of complicit poisoning of the population by industry, government, science and medicine. Anyone who doesn’t understand the perpetual historical record of the ruling 1% poisoning and exterminating the “lesser halves” needs to investigate the documented science of eugenics, which can be started by clicking here to watch a very well made video on the subject.(video linked is titled Sir Francis Galton – Father of Eugenics)
10. Dr. Ralph Scobey and Dr. Mortind Biskind testified in front of the U.S Congress in 1951 that the paralysis around the country known as polio was being caused by industrial poisons and that a virus theory was purposely fabricated by the chemical industry and the government to deflect litigation away from both parties. http://bit.ly/1DKDb3v – link here is https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/environmental-toxins/pesticides-and-polio-a-critique-of-scientific-literature/#gsc.tab=0 Do we really need to spray poisons on the food we eat or is there something else going on……and is it still going on today?
11. At this added link (click here) http://www.whale.to/a/scobey2.html titled The Poison Cause of Poliomyelitis and Obstructions To Its Investigation. we have the actual testimony of Dr. Ralph Scobey to Congress, explaining how the government, chemical companies and the media were trying to steer the public astray as to the causes and the treatment of the paralysis falsely blamed on a virus that didn’t cause paralysis. The chemical companies were poisoning the American people and some people from academia were making accusations that this was being done purposely to increase the power of a corrupt government, over the resulting dysfunctional and toxic masses. Create a problem, declare that something must be done, rally the government to start giving money to this organization or that to solve the problem (owned by friends in government) and then declare the problem has been fixed……..but what if the problem was purposely manufactured and the solving of the problem also manufactured? Do we have any evidence of the problem being created and also solved in manipulative ways?
12. In 1956 the AMA (The American Medical Association) instructed each licensed medical doctor that they could no longer classify polio as polio, or their license to practice would be terminated. Any paralysis was now to be diagnosed as AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) MS, MD, Bell’s Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig’s Disease), Guillian-Barre (GBS), meningitis, provocation poliomyelitis, transverse myelitis, viral or “aseptic” meningitis, Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, etc Included under the umbrella term “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” are Poliomyelitis, Transverse Myelitis, GBS, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis and Reye’s syndrome. http://bit.ly/1Ml3rpX (source here is a google book search of the book Immunization – The Reality Behind the Myth – page 36 with a search for the sentence ” In order to qualify for classification as paralytic poliomyelitis, the patient had to exhibit paralytic symptoms for at least 60 days) This was orchestrated purposely to make the public believe polio was eradicated by the polio vaccine campaign but because the polio vaccine contained toxic ingredients directly linked to paralysis, polio cases (not identified as polio) were skyrocketing…but only in vaccinated areas. http://bit.ly/1WEHYzR (this link ishttps://vactruth.com/2015/07/05/cdc-made-polio-disappear/ titled – The CDC Made These Two Radical Changes and 30,000 Diagnosis of Polio Disappeared Instantly Disappeared) Today most vaccine inserts declare paralysis as a potential side effect (https://www.immunize.org/fda/ ) but “reframe it” as Guillian Barre or simply “paralysis”. This is purposely designed to obfuscate the public’s understanding of what causes paralysis, which is heavy metal poisoning plus vaccine induced autoimmunity……that ends with the body attacking and destroying its’ own nervous system pathways, in an rabid attempt to clean itself of the injected toxins. Guillian Barre and paralysis, as listed vaccine side effects, are also a way to get the public running east looking for a sunset, keeping them as far away as possible from connecting the dots around this medical polio obfuscation. Aluminum and mercury are ingredients in most (if not all) vaccines today and both are proven to cause paralysis and motor neuron destruction………..known as many different names, depending on just how much the science/medical authority figure in the room wants to lead you astray that day. Polio Planned To Be Used To Coverup Vaccine Caused Guillain-Barré Syndrome (odysee.com) Here we see how mercury can cause paralysis (Japan’s Ominous Dancing Cats and the Disaster That Followed) and cause nerve damage. Here and here we see that aluminum can also cause paralysis and obviously death as well.. (Effects of Aluminum in Vaccines and Doctor Speaks Out Dangers of Aluminum in Vaccine) There’s an entire documentary about the trace amounts of neurotoxins in vaccines called Trace Amounts and how these toxins (just like lead and arsenic of the polio era) completely devastated the body with many polio like symptoms.
13. The first polio vaccine was worked on by Dr. Jonas Salk and human experiments using this vaccine were conducted purposely on orphans in government/church run institutions because they were vulnerable and didn’t require any parental consent signatures, as they had no parents. The vaccine was “declared safe” by “medicine” (as they always are even though that vaccine was killing and paralyzing monkeys in test trials) and that vaccine gave 40,000 orphans polio, permanently paralyzed hundreds and killed at least 10 children. All injuries and deaths under reported of course by the same authorities who orchestrated the atrocity. This was called The Cutter Incident (The Cutter Incident – Vaccines Do Harm). A focused attack on defenseless children, by people charged with their care. A poisoning of innocent children and then the excuses and apologies, regarding how it won’t happen again. Is this pattern still occurring today? The answer is obvious. In this attached link regarding the Cutter Incident where vulnerable children were purposely targeted, the killing of the children is advertised as “a great help to science” in better understanding the disease. Today we also have kids dying from a vaccine and the similarities don’t stop there. The Vaccine is Killing Kids (odysee.com) Salk was praised as a hero for not patenting the polio vaccine that carried his name but legally if you patent something, you’re also legally liable when it hurts someone. Salk wasn’t a hero. Is targeting the population with poison and then declaring the poison a disease an on going cycle in our modern world, which also ends with a toxic vaccine that only produces more disease? Such cycles of attacking the public over and over again is often referred to as “disaster capitalism“. Disaster capitalism drives profit for the attacking group into the stratosphere and also increases political control of the group receiving the perpetual shock doctrine.
14. The next “improved” polio vaccine, given to hundreds of millions, carried both the SV 40 cancer virus as well as the AIDS virus…..or so it was said to carry cancer causing and AIDS causing viruses………but it didn’t. What that vaccine carried was more poison, more heavy metals and more toxins……proven to kill and cripple. Every step of the way, we had medicine declaring that they knew for sure, that this time, they had everything straightened out and that The Cutter Incident would not repeat itself. Same story then, same story now. The only thing larger than the pile of broken medical and government promises regarding polio, vaccines and disease eradication…..is the pile of broken and dead bodies that rockets skywards as medicine, science and government continually apply failed healing protocols to a heavily indoctrinated and bewildered public. Vaccines are Cancer. (odysee.com) Cancerous tumors, still being pulled out of people today, are riddled with SV40 cancer viruses from the government’s “safe and effective” and “approved” polio vaccine. http://bit.ly/1jGvysV Although all three links in this point refer to “viruses” being in the new polio vaccine and causing all the deaths and injuries associated with the second generation polio vaccine, it’s important to understand that all these deaths, injuries and cancers are caused by poison. In short, the people who are poisoning you want you to believe that invisible viruses are making you sick and killing you, instead of their very visible poisons. More on that point at the bottom of the article.
15. In the book Virus Mania, top scientists in the field declare that polio doesn’t and has never qualified as a viral disease because it fails to spread from person to person or animal to animal. If it’s not a viral disease, then what is it? The answer is heavy metal and other forms of toxic poisoning that causes partial or full paralysis. (destruction of the nervous system). Connect the dots. Learn more about virus mania here.
16. The polio con job, ranked as 1 of the top 10 medical con jobs of all time, is clearly described in this selected chapter of the book “Dissolving Illusions” by leading medical doctor, Dr. Suzanne Humphries. The reason so much effort is placed into medical con jobs like this is to continually infuse the public with false fear regarding viruses that don’t exist, and also to provide false hope and blind faith belief in toxic vaccines and poisonous medications, which only worsen a population’s overall health status. Why would anyone do this? Again, this is when a confused citizen needs to investigate EUGENICS and the history (and families) behind that movement. The end result is the same, regardless of medical ambush. The elite groups who organize such fraud based operations increase tyrannical control over a diseased, die-empowered, depressed, dis-satisfied, dis-oriented and dumbed down population. Such a population is easier to control, steal from, manipulate and govern. It’s not really about polio or viruses, it’s about poisoning the population into a chemical lobotomized state that ends with increased elite domination and iron fist control. How did 80% of North Americans come to become extremely unhealthy in our most technologically advanced era? The answer is……because this has always been the design of the system. The ruling of 8 billion people by an extremely small group of 10,000 can only be achieved when that 8 billion operate in perpetual chaos…….physically, economically, mentally and spiritually. http://bit.ly/2jeQpUa Bill Gates also moves today throughout the world pushing vaccines and paralyzing innocent victims, in a very similar trail of carnage, death and destruction. Same story in the 1950’s, same story now…..the vaccines are causing paralysis in their uninformed victims. Bill Gates (here and here) has been attacking the population with vaccines (on behalf of certain groups) for at least 25 years. What you see today with COVID and the COVID vaccines falls is a cycle similar to what we observe with polio and the polio vaccines.
17. On a related note, Jonas Salk, the inventor of the first polio vaccine……..eventually wrote a book. It contains his personal views on the general public and how the society is meant to advance, under the new scientific dictatorship. Some very interesting beliefs of Jonas Salk are exposed throughout the book. Click here to see the video (Jay Dyer – Survival of the Wisest Book Review – Father of Vaccines Jonas Salk – by Jay Dyer) and you best be sitting down when you do. Salk openly endorses the medical system and associated power groups kill at will to achieve this groups very dark goals. A perfect actor to develop the polio vaccine, which is simply another needle full of poison, which can easily manipulate the public to line up for……suing the right mind control and propaganda techniques.
18. Did the Polio Vaccine Really Eradicate Polio (odysee.com)even more data showing that sickness, mimicking polio symptoms ,are experienced more frequently by people with an unhealthy diet. People receiving the polio vaccine (and other vaccines) were much more likely to be ill in general and present polio like symptoms. Disease isn’t a poison deficiency. Disease is caused by a surplus of poisons and the documented toxins in all vaccines PACK A WALLOP!
19. At this added link an acclaimed author of 9 books exposes the true intent of all vaccines, including the polio vaccination. The truth is never complex, only the lies are.
20. CLICK HERE to see a story that exposes this on going cycle. The vaccines don’t do what they say they do. Those shots or oral applications only increase sickness, which is relabeled as the disease being fought, which in turn is propagandized to increase mass poisoning of the public. The truth is that toxins can paralyze the body and the polio vaccine in question (oral as well as injectable) is straight poison and has always been so.
When someone talks of any disease, in this day and age, they’re often just repeating what they were told by the government, media, science or medicine. If you’re willing to repeat without any confirming research or resistance, this pre qualifies you to rocket up the pyramid of control, gaining promotion after promotion along the way. When someone today repeats anything about polio and polio elimination based on vaccination, they’re repeating known the lies of known liars……..who are experts in disaster capitalism, shock doctrine, murder and psychological manipuation. Repeating what you’re told and intelligence aren’t the same thing. Repeating or intelligence? The choice is yours. Repeaters are FIRM IN THEIR BELIEFS yet have NEVER researched beyond what they were told to believe. Such firm belief, with ZERO RESEARCH, is illogical and irrational. Research the hidden history of polio, the disease that never was. http://bit.ly/1DKDb3v
Click here to see over 100 medical doctors and PhD scientists explaining with statistics and research that 1) vaccines aren’t safe 2) vaccines aren’t effective 3) vaccines don’t improve immunity or resistance to disease and 4) vaccines injure, permanently cripple or kill each and every person they’re injected into. The darkness and deceit around the polio vaccine doesn’t just stop there. The entire history of vaccination, from inception to this very day, is rampant with corruption, eugenics, stealth euthanasia and for lack of a better phrase……evil intent.
CLICK HERE for a secondary review of THE POLIO LIE(s) by Tim Chapman
Further research regarding the polio deception can be found in… 1. This book by Dr. Russell Blaylock – amzn.to/1PTIq73 2. This book by Dr. Suzanne Humphries – amzn.to/1TBIaR0 3. This book by Liam Scheff – amzn.to/1TBIpLN
This portion has been added from Kate William………….
My ears practically perked up when I read that one Dr. HC Emerson, investigating a ‘polio’ outbreak in 1907, discovered that a) no polio cases in exclusively breastfed infants b) the eating of fresh fruits and vegetables preceded the onset of ‘poliomyelitis’ in many others.
Barber (1939) reported four cases of ‘polio’ that occurred the same day as strawberries were eaten, in a boarding school house.
Chenault (1941) noted the parallels between ‘polio’ outbreaks and the appearance of fresh fruit and vegetables.
Draper (1935) reported a case series of ‘polio’ which he theorized originated from a Greek fruiterer.
Naturally, I had to do some digging on this…and discovered…
Before DDT spraying, there was ARSENIC spraying!
In 1929, almost 30 million pounds of lead arsenate or calcium arsenate were sprayed in the fields and orchards of America. In fact, the government was so enthusiastic about the use of arsenic, that in 1935, an FDA-hosted radio program suggested the old nursery rhyme “A is for Apple” should be changed to: “A is for arsenate, Lead if you please, protector of apples against arch-enemies.”
In 1919, Boston Health Department was forced to destroy arsenic-coated apples because people were getting sick.
Scientists say the earth is still tainted with the residue, and believe lands once used to raise cotton, is now responsible for arsenic found in rice. Arsenate pesticides were officially banned in the US, in the 1980’s, but “modifed arsenates” are still used on cotton crops today. China, meanwhile, kept using arsenate sprays beyond 2000, and it is suspected they are still using them illegally.
Note the symptoms of acute arsenic poisoning = fever, vomiting and nausea, headache, sore throat etc. Chronic poisoning = polyneuritis and paralysis, especially in the extremities.
Sound familiar?
Also note that Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was crippled by ‘polio’ in 1921, at age 39 years, also owned an apple orchard where the family used to spend their summers, and he used to swim regularly in the pond nearby…At the time, mostly children were affected, and it was considered rare for adults to have ‘polio’.
Same con all the time – developed by science, safe and effective, the disease caused by the government and media in the first place and then more sick and dead kids are the result. Same con structure, over and over and over again. (source….Unconditional Surrender 1956 – 1956 Film on Polio Vaccine – 1956 US Polio Vaccine Propaganda)
“So the NZ authorities have been bombarding our forests & farms with this Class 1A Ecotoxin for well nigh 60 years, and the hospitals still don’t know what to do?!!! Don’t have a plan in place at all? Doesn’t that sound well … not too intelligent?“
“The 16th Amendment did not provide any new power of taxation of wages derived from labor. This means there was no power before the 16th Amendment, the Amendment did not provide power, and there has been no power added since; therefore, there is no power to tax wages coming from labor.“
Rewind to pre-American Revolution. Back then, America was under the rule of Britain. At this time, there were no income taxes, no corporate taxes, and no payroll taxes. Taxes were levied on ships on a per-tonnage basis (importing into America). This included taxes on slaves, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages. In all, the average tariff worked out to about 10 percent of the value of imports, with lower rates being imposed on goods from Britain than from elsewhere.
When Britain wanted to tax sugar and tea, the Illuminati revolutionaries in America knew this was their opportunity to act. This led to the Boston Tea Party (hoax). While that hoax was taking place, revolutionaries were imported into America to help start what we now refer to as the American Revolution. The whole thing was a giant scheme. People were told they must fight these evil taxes so they can have “freedom” and “liberty”, but, in all irony, as soon as the Revolution ended, new taxes were imposed, this time by our new government.
EWNZ comment: Don’t for one minute imagine that NZ is absent from the target list of the weather warfare mongers. Read more on that here.My inquiries of Government (Amy Adams) in 2014 revealed a firm no ..
” The Government does not allow aerosol geoengineering and although it is the subject of some discussion in the scientific community, it is not an accepted method to address climate change...I would like to assure you that there is no deliberate spraying of the nature you suggest and that the health and well-being of New Zealand citizens and our environment are a high priority for this Government.” Link to original letter here (pdf):letter from NZ Min For Environment
That’s a warm fuzzy statement isn’t it? And doesn’t it make you feel safe?Nick Smith, however, then current Min for the Environment, said in Parliament (amidst gales of laughter) that geoengineering was a hoax. ?? Who is right? (See the series on YT: What in the World are They Spraying? Who in the World etc and Why in the World etc).They are reading the globalist script! Relying on your ignorance &/or failure to look deeper than what they are telling you. Question everything!
(Click on the image or title above for the video at Rumble.com)
They have turned the entire sky into one giant death spraying gas chamber, showering your kids with aluminum, barium, and God only knows what while steering trillion dollar kill storms right into the heart of conservative America. Ariana Masters joins us with 75 years of bulletproof contracts, lab proven toxic rain, and satellite footage that nails the treasonous U.S. regime.
Western civilization has been infected by a parasitic invasion of foreign ideals and values that have been introduced into our culture by strange and morally degenerate people whose goal is world domination. We have been OCCUPIED. Watch the film
EPA Provides ‘Total Transparency On The Issues Of Geoengineering And Contrails’ After Deadly Texas Flooding, As Mainstream Media Admits Cloudseeding Occurred Before Floods
“Americans have legitimate questions about contrails and geoengineering, and they deserve straight answers,” says the EPA chief. But it’s more gaslighting as usual.
As of today, July 10th, 121 people have been confirmed dead and over 170 are still reportedly missing, after massive flooding swept through Texas last week. With flooding as horrific as it was, many have asked how such a travesty could happen, and there is some fairly solid evidence that directly points towards cloudseeding/geoengineering as the culprit. Even mainstream media is now being forced to admit it, even if they have to call those asking questions “conspiracy theorists.”
As more people become increasingly aware of the practice of weather modification and cloudseeding, as governments and companies become more overt in their ambitions to modulate the weather to supposedly fight climate change or enhance rainfall in dry areas, more people naturally are looking into this and questioning the practice.
12 U.S. states have introduced legislation to ban the practice, while Tennessee officially banned it last year.
Even though cloudseeding has been promoted on daytime television, mainstream media publications continue to label anyone questioning the practice or its existence as tin-hat wearing “conspiracy theorists.”
Nevertheless, as people began to question and post evidence that the recent floods were the cause of cloudseeding, mainstream media sprung into action to shame anyone who for thinking this… while still admitting that cloudseeding is going on.
The Washington Post cites Augustus Doricko who funded a cloudseeding startup in 2023 called Rainmaker, which prior to the storms that led to the mass flooding, dispersed metals into the atmosphere to induce more rain and that therefore was the cause of the disaster. The WaPo says, “That’s impossible, atmospheric scientists say. Cloud seeding, in which planes scatter dust particles through clouds to trigger rain and snow, remains a fledgling technology, the effects of which are too limited and localized to produce anything remotely like the 15 inches of rain that drowned swaths of South Central Texas over the Fourth of July weekend.”
The WaPo goes on to claim that “hasn’t stopped conspiracy theorists from latching onto cloud seeding as an incendiary explanation for natural disasters. The search for a scapegoat has turned a spotlight on a controversial technology that has drawn interest from drought-stricken Western states and dozens of countries looking to replenish water reservoirs, despite limited evidence that it works and broader social and environmental concerns about altering the weather.”
But the paper does still acknowledge the cloudseeding occurred and silver iodine was sprayed into the sky, per a “contract that Rainmaker had inked this spring with the South Texas Weather Modification Association,” the WaPo wrote. The paper then tries to argue these conspiracy theories are exacerbated because several dozen countries openly participate in weather modification. The outlet wrote:
Efforts to debunk conspiracy theories about geoengineering are further complicated by the fact that some governments really are trying to modify the weather.
At least 39 countries have cloud-seeding programs, according to a December report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. China has invested at least $2 billion since 2014. Saudi Arabia spent more than $250 million on cloud seeding in 2022 alone, according to the report, and the United Arab Emirates and Indiahave invested millions of dollars more in recent years.
While 10 U.S. states have proposed or passed laws banning cloud seeding, nine in the West — amid the worst droughts some areas have seen in 1,200 years — spend millions of dollars a year to squeeze rain or snow out of clouds. Utah leads the pack, with a $5 million annual cloud-seeding budget.
Modern cloud seeding uses techniques the federal government first tried in the 1940s to boost rainfall and disrupt severe storms. Government scientists spent millions of dollars over decades tinkering with clouds.
In the 1960s, the Defense Department secretly tried to induce rainfall to wash out North Vietnamese supply routes — a campaign revealedby the New York Times in 1971 and acknowledgedby the U.S. government three years later.
In another infamous instance, Air Force pilots sprinkled dry ice into a hurricane drifting over the Atlantic Ocean in 1947 to see if they could disrupt its formation; instead, the hurricane abruptly turned toward land, strengthened and caused one death and $2 million in damage, prompting public outcry. The deadly shift was a coincidence, Rauber said, but it taught scientists they should avoid any appearance of causing a disaster.
AUTHOR’S NOTE: Check out my cross-post by Yanasa TV which notes a number of the active cloudseeding projects in Texas, and scientific papers which demonstrate that minerals pumped into the atmosphere can still linger for days and potential greater precipitation than intended.
The Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation lists on its website the different active weather modification projects in the state. They include:
West Texas Weather Modification Association (WTWMA)
South Texas Weather Modification Association (STWMA)
Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District (PGWCD)
Trans Pecos Weather Modification Association (TPWMA)
Rolling Plains Water Enhancement Project
The government website explains who, how much of the state is directly cloud-seeded, and why and how they do it.
With more substantive evidence that cloud seeding could invigorate convective clouds—promoting their growth and capacity to produce rainwater—a coordinated, State-funded program began in earnest in the latter half of the 1990s. Today, with drought a pending, if not ever-present, threat to the economy and well-being of Texans, rain enhancement projects flourish within large areas of Northwest, West, and South Texas. In fact, the seven cloud seeding projects today cover about 31 million acres (or about one-sixth of the land area of the state). When a severe drought was a greater threat at the end of the previous century, as many as 51 million acres were included in cloud seeding “target” areas in the state.
Texas’ present-day cloud seeding efforts are much more than well-considered responses to drought, however. They are also concerted efforts, using the latest technological tools and understanding, to replenish fresh-water supplies in aquifers and reservoirs as well as to help meet the growing needs of agriculture, industry, and municipalities for fresh water. Political subdivisions like water conservation districts and county commissions have embraced the technology of rain enhancement as one element of a long-term, water-management strategy designed to ensure a growing population has enough water to meet its future needs.
Each of the cloud seeding projects uses specially-equipped aircraft designed to place seeding materials (in the form of pyrotechnic devices, or flares, containing silver iodide and other compounds) into convective towers (turrets of growing thunderstorms) to induce them to expand and process more atmospheric water. The seeding is achieved by burning flares either mounted on the wings of single and twin-engine aircraft or held in racks, and dropped (ejected), from the underside of the aircraft fuselage. Pilots in the aircraft are directed to convective clouds believed by the meteorologist to be treatable with the seeding agent. Timing and targeting are the two critical factors in successful seeding of young thunderstorms. The concerted efforts of both pilot(s) and meteorologist are designed to give the growing cloud a “nudge” to enable it to be more efficient in the way it uses available cloud droplets to grow raindrops.
Even though the Texas state government openly discloses its weather modification programs, some state officials continue to downplay the practice. Sid Miller, Commissioner of the Department of Texas Agriculture, claims the state is not contracting companies to spray the skies and makes an appeal to faith, claiming he prays for rain to come instead.
“There has been a lot of misinformation flying around lately, so let me clarify: the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) has absolutely no connection to cloud seeding or any form of weather modification.
“Since the passage of Senate Bill 1303 in 2011, TDA has had no legal authority, responsibilities, or involvement in any weather modification programs. That authority was transferred out of our hands more than a decade ago.
“As an eighth-generation farmer and rancher, I know what it’s like to watch the sky during a drought, hoping for rain. When Texas experiences a dry spell, I don’t depend on artificial weather manipulation; I turn to my faith. I kneel and pray, just as many farmers, ranchers, and rural communities do.
“Let’s put an end to the conspiracy theories and stop blaming others. Our priority should be the recovery efforts in the Texas Hill Country, as we stand in solidarity with our fellow Texans.”
But with many Texans and Americans unsatisfied, yesterday the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a statement promising “Americans Total Transparency on the Issues of Geoengineering and Contrails.” The EPA published two new online resources “to communicate everything the agency knows about the latest science, research and other information regarding contrails and geoengineering,” the press release explains. “EPA is committed to total transparency with the American public on these topics.”
The press release adds:
EPA’s new online resource on condensation trails, or “contrails,” explains the science behind the aerial phenomenon and addresses myths and misconceptions that have persisted for decades. The new webpage also addresses head-on various claims that these occurrences are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.
EPA also created a new online resource focused specifically on solar geoengineering activities, which involve cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight back to space, usually through injecting gases, like sulfur dioxide, into the upper atmosphere where they form reflective particles.
The resource delves into the current state of science and research surrounding geoengineering, including the potentially negative impacts it could have on the environment and human health, including depleting the ozone layer, harming crops, altering weather patterns and creating acid rain.
EPA’s new resource also details what EPA has done to identify and track private actors potentially engaged in such activities. Additionally, the online resource discusses weather modification and cloud seeding, and related federal and state government actions.
Along with the release was a video statement from EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who attempted to quell concerns Americans have over weather modification. Zeldin acknowledges Americans have been “vilified,” he said, for years for simply asking questions, but under the Trump administration seeks to provide total transparency.
“Americans have legitimate questions about contrails and geoengineering, and they deserve straight answers.
“EPA shares the significant reservations many Americans have when it comes to geoengineering activities.
“Everything we know about contrails to solar/geoengineering will be in there. That means anyone who reads through this information will know as much about these topics as I do as EPA Administrator.
“To anyone who has ever looked up to the streaks in the sky and asked, ‘What the heck is going on?’ Or seen headlines about private actors, and even governments looking to “blot out the sun” in the name of stopping global warming, we’ve endeavored to answer all of your questions […]. In fact, EPA shares many of the same concerns […].”
However, the two links provided by the EPA give the status quo answer and claims there is no connection to geoengineering. Salon reported.
“The EPA website on contrails states in no uncertain terms that “chemtrails” are a myth. The term is used among conspiracy theorists who believe that the contrails of vapor that can form behind an airplane’s engines are actually chemicals being distributed from high altitude. The EPA said those claims are inaccurate, but added that it was “reasonable to ask questions” about unfamiliar phenomena.”
Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz called the idea baseless. “To the best of my knowledge, there is zero evidence of anything related to anything like weather modification,” Cruz told reporters on Monday. “Look, the internet can be a strange place. People can come up with all sorts of crazy theories.”
The closest admission the EPA provides is a short blurb stating: “Persistent contrails can interact with wind and clouds to form cirrus clouds, which are thin, wispy clouds that are common at high altitudes.”
When it comes to the term “chemtrails,” the EPA essentially says that this is a false appropriation and conflation with contrails from jet engines. The EPA tries to pass the buck to crop-dusters flying at low levels to spray pesticides on farm fields.
“Chemtrails” is a shortening of the term “chemical trails”. It is a term some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.
“Some members of the public have been concerned when they see low flying planes spraying fields known as crop dusting.”
In the end, the EPA pretends it has no knowledge of the U.S. ever intentionally participating in geoengineering.
“The federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification. Geoengineering encompasses a broad range of activities that intentionally attempt to cool the Earth or remove gases from the atmosphere. A subset of these activities is intended to cool the Earth by modifying the amount of sunlight reaching Earth’s surface. This is a subject currently going through intense domestic and international public debate, research, and scrutiny for good reason.”
The WinePress News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, November 15, 2025, #536
Tucker Carlson has now added his voice to the all important battle of exposing and halting the climate engineering assault. The discussion of climate engineering between myself and Tucker went live. Tens of millions of views on numerous posts have accumulated since, and are still growing. A number of international media sources also covered the exchange, just in time for the COP climate conference in Brazil. Will the climate engineering issue finally be forced into the full light of day? Are we finally nearing a critical mass of awareness? Will US mainstream media paid geoengineering deniers finally be forced to face the wrath of justifiably enraged populations? The awakening can’t come soon enough, we are rapidly running out of time. The latest breaking bad news headlines are featured in this installment of Global Alert News.
5G APOCALYPSE argues that 5G poses an existential threat to humanity, suggesting it could lead to widespread health issues, environmental destruction, and even serve as a tool for global control.
It features interviews with weapons development experts, biologists, molecular and cellular biologists and activists trying to bring to light the dangers of 5G technology, who state that millimetre-wave radiation from 5G infrastructure can cause cancer, genetic damage and mass extinction.
The documentary centres around Mark Steele, a British engineer, inventor, patent writer and weapons research scientist. In 2022, he wrote a report at the request of lawyers on 5G in the context of nanometal-contaminated vaccines. You can read more about his report HERE.
The documentary begins: “It’s important to understand what the 5G is doing and what they say it’s doing. We’re told on the IEEE beamforming document that this technology cooked your eyes like eggs in World War II. And you all need to understand: these are military weapons; these are assault frequencies. If you garnered nothing more than that, that’s what you need to know. It’s microwave radiation warfare, that’s what this is.”
US Government Accidentally Sends A Strange Conspiracy Theory File Describing ‘Remote Mind Control’ And ‘Forced Memory Blanking’ report HERE
William Ross Adey, MD, will be our 1999 Hans Selye Award Recipient. He is being honoured for his seminal contributions to our understanding of the biologic effects of feeble electromagnetic forces, and for defining the parameters of the “Adey window” of activity. Report HERE
Connected: The Fascinating Future of Brain-Computer Interfaces report HERE
What is a Brain-Computer Interface? Everything You Need To Know report HERE
DARPA Announces Funding for a High-Resolution, Implantable Neural Interface report HERE
$21.6 Million Funding From DARPA to Build Window Into the Brain report HERE
The project is one of six funded this year by DARPA’s Neural Engineering System Design program – part of the federal government’s Brain Initiative – to develop implantable, biocompatible “neural interfaces” that can compensate for visual or hearing deficits. Report HERE
Brave New World: ‘Metabolic Dominance’, DARPA Wants To Create Mind-Controlled Weapons Of War report HERE
“Targeted Individuals” are Non-Consensual Subjects in Criminal, Clandestine, Classified “Top Secret” MK ULTRA-Extended Mind & Behaviour Control/Torture Experimentation by Joint Military/Intel/Justice/Academic Institutions, as well as Targets of COINTELPRO and Electronic Warfare report HERE
Apparatus and Method for Remotely Monitoring and Altering Brain Waves report HERE
Remote Neural Monitoring Satellite Harassment/Terrorism Awareness! Report HERE
CIA Infiltrated 17 area groups gave out LSD report HERE
Horrific Human Rights Violations: The Unleashing of Beamed Non-Kinetic Energy Weapons Termed “Non-lethal” for Vicious Police & Military Civilian Assaults report HERE
The Illuminati’s Trauma-Based Mind Control report HERE
The “gyrotron resonance maser”, a machine that talks to the brain. The PREMA scanner” (“Personal Radio and Electromagnetic Frequency Allocation”) identifies the unique frequency of a brain report HERE
Remote Neural Monitoring, Voice to Skull (V2K) Key Evidence/Proof- explanatory YouTube and article report HERE
Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells science paper HERE
Effects of Graphene-Based Materials on the Behaviour of Neural Stem Cells, Influence of Functional Groups on Toxicity of Carbon Nanomaterials, science papers HERE and HERE
Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells science paper HERE
Effects of Graphene-Based Materials on the Behaviour of Neural Stem Cells science paper HERE
Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain chip demo explained. An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels science paper HERE
EWNZ comment: I noticed quite a few years back that some Doctors don’t like you questioning their wisdom. Departing from their narrative can make them blunt and very unhelpful. They are the experts and you are not. I have also noticed they are inclined to give orders rather than discuss. We saw that with the arm dart in recent years and many prefer now to not trust them at all …. to see how the less compliant Doctors fared for the past 5-6 years check out the nzdsos.com doctors.Some were struck off for failing to follow the narrative.
A few days ago, I posted a short tweet that unexpectedly exploded online on multiple platforms. It wasn’t complicated. It wasn’t a long thread. Just a simple observation I’ve made over many years of practicing medicine and working closely with thousands of people striving for better health.
Here’s what I wrote:
“The healthiest people I know are very skeptical of what doctors tell them. There’s a lesson in that somewhere.”
The reaction to it was enormous— and not just on twitter.
But this newsletter isn’t about social media. It’s about why such a simple thought struck a chord with so many.
Today I want to unpack this idea, dive deeper into the psychology behind it, and explore what it means for your own health moving forward.
Dr. Suneel Dhand Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Subscribe
This message isn’t just anti-doctor. It’s not rebellious for the sake of rebellion. It’s something much more important:
It’s about taking ownership of your health in a world where far too many people have handed that responsibility away.
Why This Short Thought Resonated So Strongly
The tweet took off because people instinctively knew it to be true. Over and over, I hear similar comments patients, random people, and online messages:
“I wish I had questioned things earlier.” “I finally learned to advocate for myself.” “I got healthier when I stopped relying on pills alone.”
At some point, people realize:
The healthcare system is overwhelmed.
Most medical visits are rushed.
Doctors are too often just mindlessly follow guidelines, time limits, and insurance.
And medications, while sometimes necessary, are too often the default answer.
What truly resonated was this silent truth:
You can absolutely respect your doctor and still rigorously question the system. And you should.
The healthiest people already do.
Healthy Skepticism Is a Strength, Not a Rebellion
When I say “skeptical,” I don’t mean dismissive or argumentative for the sake of it. I mean curious. Proactive. Awake to the ways of the world.
The healthiest individuals tend to:
Ask thoughtful questions
Research conditions themselves instead of accepting labels
Seek second opinions
Learn about nutrition and lifestyle
Understand their lab results
Notice patterns in their own bodies
Push back when something doesn’t make sense
This attitude leads to better outcomes because it prevents passivity.
Healthy people are active participants in their health— not passive recipients of advice.
They don’t outsource responsibility. They partner with their physicians, but they remain in the driver’s seat.
This mindset creates a completely different life trajectory.
A Broken System Has Taught People to Think Differently
People have watched “standard medical advice” change countless times.
Decades of shifting guidance on:
cholesterol
saturated fat
salt
medication-first approaches
low-fat diets
food pyramids
vaccine safety and side effects
exercise recommendations
blood pressure
…have made people realize that science “evolves”, systems change, guidelines get updated— and often those guidelines were influenced by things that had nothing to do with health.
It’s not that all doctors don’t care. It’s that the system doesn’t encourage deeper exploration, root-cause thinking, or preventative action.
And so the people who thrive are the ones who say:
“Let me look into this myself.”
They don’t settle for: “This is just how it is when you get older.” or “You’ll be on this medication for life.”
They want to know why. They want to know if there’s another way. And more often than not…there is.
The Common Traits of People Who Stay Vibrant and Strong
Over years of working with all types of individuals, I’ve noticed clear patterns among those who maintain their health and vitality.
They ask questions.
They don’t fear sounding “difficult.” They fear being uninformed.
They focus on fundamentals, not fads.
Real food. Movement. Sleep. Stress reduction. Strength training.
They don’t wait until something is wrong.
They proactively monitor their health — labs, weight, waist circumference, blood sugar, inflammation markers.
They’re willing to change.
They don’t cling to old habits simply because they’re familiar.
They stay curious.
Curiosity keeps the brain engaged and the body improving.
They know medication is sometimes needed— but rarely the full answer.
They want to solve problems, not mask symptoms.
This all stems from one key trait: A mindset of personal leadership.
Doctors Are Guides— But YOU Are the Decision-Maker
This is where the conversation gets interesting.
The healthiest people don’t view doctors as infallible authorities. They view them as advisors and coaches.
A good doctor doesn’t want blind compliance. A good doctor wants a patient who is informed, motivated, and involved.
When someone partners with their doctor— instead of deferring everything — the outcomes are dramatically better.
Think of it like this:
A doctor can recommend. A doctor can interpret. A doctor can support.
But only you live in your body 24 hours a day.
Only you feel the daily consequences of your choices.
Only you have the long-term incentive to make the right decisions.
This isn’t disrespect. It’s maturity.
So What’s the Real Lesson?
The viral response wasn’t only about people challenging medicine. It was about people awakening to something they should have been taught from childhood:
Your health is your responsibility. Your body is your project. Your life is your outcome.
And the healthcare system is broken.
Doctors can help— and many do incredible work.
But the direction, the mindset, the leadership?
That must come from you.
Healthy skepticism doesn’t divide you from your doctor— it strengthens the partnership with the good doctor.
It turns you into a powerful, informed, unstoppable advocate for your own well-being.
And in today’s world, that mindset is not optional. It’s essential.
Everybody is aware of how invasive smartphone data collection is, and many know how to limit it. But very few people realise that their car is doing the same thing – sometimes even more aggressively – and with fewer legal safeguards than mobile devices.
Inside, your car is a sensor farm. GPS saves your every move, cameras record facial expressions, microphones can listen in to phone calls, accelerometers record behavioural metrics, and the infotainment system stores everything from your phone. It’s a goldmine for third parties. The features that make the driving experience safer and slicker also pipe personal data to manufacturers, insurance companies, marketers and data brokers. The Mozilla Foundation even called cars the worst product category for privacy reporting that all 25 of 25 major car brands failed basic privacy tests – and some even admitted sharing data with marketing partners without additional consent.
Here’s what’s happening, and what you can do about it.
What Your Car Quietly Collects
Some of the data harvested by your vehicle makes sense, such as GPS data for navigation or tyre pressure monitoring for safety. Other tools keep you in lane, call emergency services, and prevent collisions, but also generate rich datasets about where you go, how you drive, and even who’s in the cabin. Precise location history, in-car microphone recordings, and driving behaviour are stored and transmitted to manufacturers, and third-party brokers. Most of this is buried in default settings and app permissions, masked as convenient connectivity to users.
All of this was approved through the Biden Infrastructure Bill in 2021, along with the infamous vehicle “Kill Switch” that can shut down the vehicle remotely. That, too, is still in play.
You can check exactly what data is collected by your vehicle using websites such as Privacy4Cars or VehiclePrivacyReport.
You Can Restrict It – But There’s a Catch
Car makers can share or sell driving data and in-car collections for analytics, insurance pricing, advertising, and product development. While it’s possible to toggle certain sharing in vehicle menus, disabling some analytics also restrict features that drivers actually want such as live traffic or emergency calling options. Regaining privacy often means giving up conveniences you already paid for.
Infotainment platforms and connected services may also have their own pipelines and policies too. The end result is a confusing patchwork where opt-outs in one place don’t necessarily carry over, and ultimate privacy can be hard to achieve.
Why Is It Legal?
The Supreme Court in the US did rule that GPS tracking of a vehicle constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, which means that law enforcement must get a warrant before tracking your car. But, amazingly, that ruling only applies to government surveillance. Corporate data collection by private companies, including car makers and insurance companies, aren’t bound by the same constitutional limits.
So, while the police need a warrant, entities profiting from your data do not. Accepting the terms and conditions at the dealership or when first using the car’s infotainment system means you’ve probably already consented to it, too.
How Cars are More Invasive Than Phones
Smartphones collect location, Bluetooth beacons, and in-app events that can be linked to advertising ID or user accounts. App permissions, OS prompts and platform rules give tyou some visibility and control, and you can set location settings to Only While Using, revoke background access, and reset advertising IDs. But car data settings are more opaque and much trickier to navigate, with controls scattered between the dealer, the manufacturer, companion apps and more.
Many people expect their phones to track them and have learned to simply manage those settings, which often come with clearer guidelines on when something is and is not actively monitoring their activity. Generally, people do not expect their cars to create a profile that is just as valuable – and in some cases even more actionable – for third parties.
They Say You Can Opt Out, But It’s Not Always True
Turning off location services or clicking to opt out does not necessarily mean you’re in the clear. Independent research and investigative journalists have found that some connected vehicles continue to transmit telemetry for diagnostics, safety updates, or “system performance” even when privacy settings are disabled.
And because the manufacturers control the software, there’s no public way to check what’s really being sent in the background. For many drivers, the only option is to trust the manufacturer’s promise – something that Mozilla’s 2023 report tells us is unwise given that every tested car brand failed basic privacy checks.
In short, some brands’ default settings mean that the only true fix is choosing a different car.
Final Thought
Analytics can save lives when the vehicle spots a crash, routes drivers around storms, or highlights a mechanical failure in the car. But it crosses into profitable surveillance when the same hardware also feeds businesses that create driver profiles, tailor prices, and targets individuals without clear consent. Privacy needs to be treated like a core safety feature too. Take time to audit your settings, restrict app access, wipe your data before service or sale, and make sure you know what will be recorded and sold before you buy your next car.
Join the Conversation
Did you know how invasive car data collection can be? Have you checked settings in your own car? What else is tracking us without our knowledge? Most of us are so focused on phone tracking that we forget what else is profiling us. Add your thoughts at the link/source.
You know me. I always manage to dig up the secretest of the secret plans that the secret conspirators have drawn up in secret (and TOTALLY don’t want you to see!).
Like when I went deep undercover to pilfer Joe Biden’s (handlers’) secret plans for his incoming administration (including the Summit for Democracy that was held several months later).
Or when I dug up The Club of Rome’s super-secret book laying out their (secret) plan to use climate change as an excuse to create a “common enemy against whom we can unite.” (Spoiler: the common enemy “is humanity itself.”)
Or when I uncovered David Rothkopf’s top secret admission that there is a secret “Superclass“ of 6,000 people who are actually running world events from behind the scenes.
Yes, let’s just say I have top secret sources that I can’t tell you about (so don’t ask me for links). “Just trust me and my secret sources!” That’s what I always say!
So, here’s another incredible, super-duper, ultra-classified, long-buried secret manifesto that I have managed to get my hands on. It’s a step-by-step guide that the Powers-That-Shouldn’t-Be have been following for centuries, and it’s designed to deliver you straight into slavery.
Don’t worry, though; I’m so generous I’ll even share the whole plan with you!
This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Subscribe
The Plan
What is this plan called, you ask? Where did you find it?
Don’t ask such things! We don’t have time for that!
All you need to know is that this is a covert, occulted, never-before-seen 10-step plan. And, as you can see, they—who? ugggh! I just told you not to ask questions!—have almost completed its implementation:
Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Abolition of all right of inheritance.
Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State: the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Equal obligation of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c., &c.
There it is, in black and white!
So, let’s see how this plan is going, shall we?
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
What? Do you think you “own” the land that you “purchased”? Oh, my sweet summer child. How naive!
What happens if you were to stop paying property taxes on the land that you “own”?
What happens if you try to build a new structure on your property or even build an extension on an existing building without the proper permit?
What happens if you try to prevent federal agents from intruding on your property?
But don’t worry, guys, this is just a “temporary measure.” I’m sure they’ll repeal it when the First World War is over.
3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
Abolish? Not yet. But federal and state estate taxes have certainly managed to siphon off a goodly portion of inherited wealth for the benefit of the ruling class.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
If you don’t know about the centralization of credit in the US, by means of a national bank with State capital, I have a documentary you might want to see.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
Should I talk about the USPS monopoly (and Lysander Spooner’s battle against it), or about the FCC and its presumed monopoly of the airwaves, or should I merely point to the existence of the FAA and the Department of Transportation?
In any event, ‘nuff said.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State: the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Haha. That’s a good one! The rubes will fall for that “the state will run the farms and factories!” propaganda, whereas, in reality, all they’ll get is the deliberate offshoring of industrial capacity to the next great bogeyman and an all-out, fifth-generation war on farmers.
8. Equal obligation of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Equality of obligation to labour? You mean, like taking half of the population that wasn’t in the work force and putting them in the work force? Well, what do you think the CIA-supported feminist revolution was all about? Just ask Nicholas Rockefeller (whoever he is). He’ll tell you!
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
Agriculture? Manufacturing? Why not just eliminate both and have a service economy that produces nothing and enriches no one but the top 1% of the top 1%?
And why not abolish town and country altogether and herd everyone into perfectly controlled 15-minute cities?
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc., etc.
Yes! Pry kids free from the sticky tentacles of their icky biological parents and throw them into the comforting arms of the state! Public schools will surely indoctrinate them properly. And while we’re at it, we can train them for a life of industrial production (as Woodrow Wilson wanted)…or whatever we’re preparing them for these days!
Mission Accomplished?
So, you still insist on knowing what this plan is and where it comes from. Oh, very well. Here it is:
Oh, this isn’t such a secret plan, you say? Everyone has heard of it, you retort?
Well, perhaps that’s the point. The “secret plans” of the “secret cabal” are almost invariably not that secret.
And so here we are with yet another “secret” plan that has been public knowledge for nearly two centuries.
Yes, in the end, there’s nothing at all secret about the end game of the pathocrats. There’s nothing difficult to understand. It all boils down to this: they hate you and think of you as nothing more than tax cattle to be manipulated, bamboozled, fleeced and slaughtered as needed.
Once you understand that, the rest is mere details. The real question is this: what are you going to do about it?
Like this type of essay? Then you’ll love The Corbett Report Subscriber newsletter, which contains my weekly editorial as well as recommended reading, viewing and listening.
If you’re a Corbett Report member, you can sign in to corbettreport.com and read the newsletter today.
Not a member yet? Sign up today to access the newsletter and support this work.
Are you already a member and don’t know how to sign in to the website? Contact me HERE and I’ll be happy to help you get logged in
Fall’s shorter days and lower sun angle reduce ultraviolet (UV) B exposure, making it harder to produce adequate vitamin D through sunlight alone
Check daily UV Index and consider your skin type (Fitzpatrick
phototype) to determine sun exposure needs; darker skin tones require
more time in sunlight
Consume vitamin D-rich foods like wild-caught Alaskan salmon, rainbow trout, herring, and fortified dairy products to supplement reduced sun exposure during fall and winter months
Take vitamin D3 supplements with healthy fats, aiming for 60 to 80 ng/mL in your blood; include magnesium and vitamin K2 to optimize absorption and metabolism
Reduce linoleic acid (LA) intake below 2% of calories and supplement with C15:0 to purge skin toxins, enabling safer sun exposure for vitamin D production in the long run
The best way to produce vitamin D is through sensible sun exposure. However, with autumn now in full swing, the days are getting shorter. Thus, people who live in areas who don’t get enough sunlight won’t be able to produce the appropriate amount of vitamin D to support their health.
To spread awareness of this issue, I recently appeared on NTD News, offering viewers practical strategies to optimize their vitamin D levels during fall, as well as the upcoming winter. These points are also explored below.
Why Fall Makes Vitamin D Trickier to Optimize
Fall is a beloved season in the U.S., drawing many nature lovers to northern states and basking in the changing picturesque foliage.1 However, this presents certain health problems down the line:
•Changes in the Earth’s angle against the sun — Earth follows an elliptical orbit, which means that its distance between the sun varies throughout the year.2 Following this logic, the Earth’s axis and distance from sun during fall cause shorter days, a lower sunlight angle, and cooler temperatures. The result? Lower vitamin D levels.
•Factors affecting vitamin D production — Ultraviolet B (UVB), the type of sunlight that triggers vitamin D production on your skin, is affected by season, time of day, latitude, clouds, and your skin’s melanin concentration.
In many places during summer, incidental sun is enough to produce vitamin D, but not in late fall and winter. So, shifting your diet and taking supplements (as needed) are essential to maintaining optimal levels.3
How Much Sun Exposure Helps in Autumn?
There isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach when optimizing your vitamin D in fall. Here are some guidelines, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):4
•Check the daily UV Index (UVI) — This is a forecast provided by the National Weather Service, providing information on the current UV radiation readings throughout the day. Here’s a tip — the highest numbers occur during solar noon.5
•Consider your Fitzpatrick phototype — It’s a guide that describes how certain skin colors react when exposed to sunlight. Thus, it can be used to help you determine how much time you need to be exposed during the day. Here’s a chart from DermNet to help you:6
Skin Type
Typical Features
Tanning Ability
I
Pale white skin, blue/green eyes, blonde/red hair
Always burns, does not tan
II
Fair skin, blue eyes
Burns easily, tans poorly
III
Darker white skin
Tans after initial burn
IV
Light brown skin
Burns minimally, tans easily
V
Brown skin
Rarely burns, tans darkly easily
VI
Dark brown or black skin
Never burns, always tans darkly
Framing the information above within the context of my NTD News segment, if you live in higher latitudes and/or have deeper skin tones, you’ll generally synthesize less D from the sun, especially during fall.
What’s a good sign your body has produced enough for the day? In a previous article, I noted that the limit is when your skin begins to turn slightly pink. If that doesn’t even happen to you during fall, then you’ll need to compensate the remaining through your diet.
Continuing the point above, vitamin D is also found in various foods. The table below shows you well-known sources and how much you’ll get, depending on serving size:7
Food
Serving Size
Vitamin D Amount (IU)
Rainbow trout, freshwater
3 ounces
645
Salmon
3 ounces
383 to 570
Herring
3 ounces
182
Tilapia
3 ounces
127
Yogurt, plain
8 ounces
116
Kefir, plain
1 cup
100
Cheese, American
1.5 ounces
85
Mushrooms, raw
1 cup
Between 0 to 1,110
Should You Take Vitamin D2 or D3, and How Much?
Aside from food, you can optimize your vitamin D levels through supplementation. However, there is some confusion between what is generally available to consumers — vitamin D2 and D3:
•Have yourself tested first — No matter which strategy you employ — sunlight exposure, food, and supplements — it’s always a good idea to have your vitamin D levels tested to know your baseline.
When visiting a lab, ask for a 25-hydroxy vitamin Dtest. This measures the current vitamin D levels circulating within your body. In America, most guidelines set the sufficiency cutoff at 40 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL), or 100 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) in Europe. However, I believe that isn’t enough — the real protective benefits of vitamin D occur when you reach a range between 60 and 80 ng/mL.
•Vitamin D2 versus D3 — As noted in my interview with NTD News, vitamin D2 comes from plants, while vitamin D3 comes from animals. If you’re going to pick one, I recommend vitamin D3, as it’s significantly more effective at raising blood vitamin D levels.
One more thing about vitamin D3 — it’s a fat-soluble nutrient. This means that in order to be fully absorbed, you need to take it with meals that include healthy fat, such as pasture-raised egg yolks, tallow, or grass fed butter.
•Supplement interactions — When taking vitamin D3 supplements, remember to increase your intake of magnesium and vitamin K2. These nutrients improve how your body processes vitamin D. For every 5,000 international units (IUs) of vitamin D you ingest, take around 180 micrograms (mcg) of vitamin K2 in MK-7 form, as well as 400 milligrams (mg) of magnesium.
•Medications affecting vitamin D function — Check with your doctor if you’re taking medications such as statins and steroids. According to the Office of Dietary Supplements, corticosteroid medications such as prednisone can impair vitamin D metabolism.8
•Rechecking interval —Have your blood tested every three to six months. This gives you enough time to see the effectiveness of your regimen at boosting vitamin D levels, and whether or not adjustments are needed.
Does Using Sunscreen in Fall Block Vitamin D Production?
Public messaging of sunlight exposure can be confusing. For example, dermatology organizations advise not seeking UV exposure for vitamin D because UV is a proven skin-cancer risk and even advise wearing sunscreen while outside.9 In short, they’re advocating that you avoid and fear sunlight.
•The link between sunlight and skin cancer — The fear of increased cancer risk perpetuated by dermatologists has some merit, but it’s important to understand the nuances. As I mentioned in the interview, making vitamin D through sunlight can increase your risk of squamous cell and basal cell carcinoma. But the good thing is that these are caught early and can be treated right away, making mortality risk very low.
Meanwhile, safe sun exposure lowers the risk of melanoma, which is the dangerous type of skin cancer you don’t want to get. Much of the reasons why melanoma risk increases is because many of us eat a diet high in linoleic acid (LA), which is perishable and becomes toxic when exposed to sunlight. It’s only that when you eliminate LA from your system that you can truly reap the benefits of sunlight safely — this process is explained below.
•Avoid excessive use of sunscreens — These products block vitamin D synthesis and even interfere with your endocrine health. In fact, a sunscreen with an SPF of just 30 blocks about 97.5% of UVB radiation, effectively shutting down your body’s ability to make vitamin D.
•Ditch vitamin D lamps — On a related note, devices that generate UV light, such as nail driers, can damage your DNA. In a previous article, I discussed published research showing how regular use of these products actually increase your risk of skin cancer.
A Simple Fall Checklist
Based on all the information I outlined above, monitoring and increasing your vitamin D levels can be burdensome. To help, here’s a handy checklist you can keep for reference. I recommend printing it out and hanging it somewhere visible:
•Daily base intake — The Office of Dietary Supplements recommends you aim for a daily intake of 600 to 800 IUs from all sources.10 However, this is a far too low a number.
As noted in my interview with NTD News, you can safely take 10,000 IUs a day without harming your health. That said, it’s important to check your levels, too. Vitamin D toxicity, while rare, is a real side effect.
•Shop smart — Keep fish such as wild-caught Alaskan salmon in your rotation. These are the safest choices as they’re generally low in mercury compared to farmed fish. Similarly, look for grass fed varieties of dairy products.
•Mind your medications — Consult with your doctor to rule out interactions on vitamin D synthesis if you’re currently taking medications for a disease.
•Develop your sun sense — Regularly review the UVI reports and be mindful of your Fitzpatrick phototype to make sure you don’t get sunburned.
•Test and retest — Take a 25-hydroxy vitamin D test and aim for a range between 60 to 80 ng/mL.
The Issue of Sunlight Exposure Without Fixing Your Diet
One important aspect I emphasized in my interview is linoleic acid (LA) becoming embedded in your skin. Purging it is crucial when it comes to optimizing vitamin D levels because sunlight exposure causes toxic metabolites to form, which will damage your cellular health. That said, it is paramount that you reduce your LA intake right away.
At the same time, I recommend increasing your intake of pentadecanoic acid, also known as C15:0. It is a rare, odd-chain saturated fat that displaces LA in your skin, allowing you to reap the benefits of regular sun exposure. For an in-depth explanation of how this process occurs, read “The Fast-Track Path to Clearing Vegetable Oils from Your Skin.” Once you’ve familiarized yourself with the benefits of C15:0, follow the protocol below:
1.Keep LA intake below 2% of your total daily calories — Remove all industrial vegetable oils from your diet, including soybean, corn, sunflower, safflower, cottonseed, canola, and grapeseed oils from your diet. LA is common in ultraprocessed foods, condiments, restaurant meals, and packaged snacks.
LA also accumulates in the fat of grain-fed livestock, especially chicken and pork, often reaching concentrations similar to those found in vegetable oils sold in groceries. To minimize exposure, choose pasture-raised or grass fed meat whenever possible.
2.Take 2 grams of C15:0 daily, split between meals — Use a high-quality pentadecanoic acid powder or a certified butter or ghee concentrate rich in C15:0. Divide the total dose across meals to promote consistent uptake into your tissues.
3.Check your progress every three months — Use a red blood cell test or dried blood spot test to confirm that your C15:0 levels are at least 0.4% and that LA remains under 5% of your total fat levels. These benchmarks indicate successful cellular remodeling.
If your results stop improving, look for unrecognized sources of LA or review your dosing for possible inconsistencies.
4.Encourage fat turnover through healthy lifestyle changes — Boost the clearance of stored LA with intermittent fasting, high-intensity training, and regular heat exposure via sauna sessions or hot baths.
Limit vigorous exercise to 75 minutes or less per week, as longer bouts can hinder recovery and longevity. When fasting, avoid chronic or extreme restriction, which can suppress thyroid function and metabolism. Sporadic, short fasts are safer and more sustainable.
5.Build up sun tolerance gradually, especially in your first two summers — While LA remains high in your body fat, the skin is more prone to UV-induced oxidative stress. During this period, avoid midday sunlight (11 a.m. to 3 p.m.) and go out during early morning or late afternoon instead.
Once LA levels decline and cell membranes stabilize, your skin’s resilience improves, allowing you to increase midday exposure slowly without burning.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Optimizing Vitamin D Levels in Fall
Q: How much sun do I need for vitamin D in the fall?
A: There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, since your vitamin D production depends on factors like your skin tone, latitude, and the daily UV Index. As a rule of thumb, check your local UVI forecast each day.
If you have pale or fair skin, you’ll only need a short time of direct sunlight exposure. Those with deeper skin tones may need to take longer for similar vitamin D output. However, during late fall or for those living in northern regions, UVB levels often drop too low to make enough vitamin D, meaning sunlight alone may not be sufficient.
Q: What’s the best time of day to make vitamin D in autumn?
A: The best window is around solar noon — roughly between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. — when the sun’s rays hit the Earth most directly. This is when UVB exposure is strongest, allowing your body to produce vitamin D more efficiently in less time.
In fall, the sun’s lower angle means UVB rays are weaker, so early morning or late afternoon exposure won’t trigger much vitamin D production. If you live in northern states, your skin may not generate any vitamin D during the later months of fall. In those cases, food and supplementation become helpful.
Q: Which foods are highest in vitamin D for fall meal planning?
A: When sunlight isn’t enough, you can boost your vitamin D by adding certain foods to your meals. Natural sources include fatty fish like wild-caught Alaskan salmon, rainbow trout, herring, and tilapia. Grass fed dairy products such as yogurt, kefir, and cheese also provide smaller amounts. For plant-based options, mushrooms exposed to sunlight or UV light are viable.
Q: Should I take vitamin D3 or D2 in fall?
A: If you’re planning to take a supplement, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is the superior choice. D3 is the form your body naturally makes from sunlight and is far more effective than D2 (ergocalciferol), which comes from plants. Since it’s a fat-soluble vitamin, take D3 with a meal that includes healthy fats, such as grass fed butter, pasture-raised egg yolks, or tallow, so it can be absorbed properly.
For every 5,000 IUs of vitamin D3, pair it with about 180 mcg of vitamin K2 (MK-7 form) and 400 mg of magnesium to enhance absorption and balance calcium metabolism. Lastly, always test your levels before supplementing, especially if you’re taking medications.
Q: When should I test my vitamin D levels in fall?
A: It’s best to test early in the season (around late September or October) to establish your baseline and then retest every three to six months to track progress. Ask your health care provider for a 25-hydroxy vitamin D test for accurate results.
While many labs consider 40 ng/mL sufficient, optimal protection for immunity, metabolic health, and cancer prevention typically appear between 60 and 80 ng/mL. If your results are below this range, consider combining sun exposure with dietary and supplemental vitamin D3 throughout fall and winter.
![Is INCOME TAX Illegal? The Answer May Surprise You [PART 1]](https://envirowatchnz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/question-mark-2123966_1280.jpg?w=672&h=372&crop=1)
You must be logged in to post a comment.