“For Greeks a blush, for Greece a tear.” —Lord Byron
Greece will start inoculating health care workers starting December 27. It’s pretty well known that whoever refuses loses their job and becomes black listed. That is not said anywhere, but that’s what we all know to be true, and the article I linked to intimates in the end paragraphs health care workers best not refuse the vaccine.
Greece, a country of 11 million, will give the Pfizer vaccine free. For now, the government is not saying that it is mandatory, but we are expecting the privacy claim of “no mandates” to be a façade because we likely won’t be able to enter anywhere public without proof of the vax, just the way they require proof from Greeks and foreigners that you took the Covid test 72 hours before entering Greece.
Starting December 21, there will be randomized testing throughout Greece, in neighborhoods everywhere.
My partner, who is 70, told me that the plan is for those over 65 to receive a phone call and be told when to come in for the shot. We don’t know what will happen because my partner is absolutely against vaccines.
Our second lockdown started November 6 and was supposed to end November 30, but on December 1 it immediately got extended to January 7.
Unless you are an essential worker, if you want to go out of your home you must send the government a request by SMS and wait for them to text back permission to leave. If you don’t use a phone (which I never do) you can fill out a piece of paper called Extraordinary Movement Permit which you must carry with your ID. See attached. It shows the 6 grounds on which you may leave your home, one of which is to exercise, although no group exercise allowed and only two people at a time can walk or run together, safely apart of course.
The other day a man on the island of Lemnos got fined because during his daily walk he was not wearing athletic clothes. Last March I was out on my daily walk along the sea and stopped to rest on a bench – I was fined 300 euros for not exercising.
There’s a 5am to 10 pm curfew, and just the other day the curfew In west attica has been restricted further to 6 pm. Churches cannot congregate, and at least one priest has been arrested. For Christmas 25 people max allowed in standard churches and private gatherings of 9 people per 2 families.
We cannot travel from one region to the next nor from one municipality to the next.
I know of no lawsuits in Greece challenging any of these diktats. And of course there are no protest rallies because you’ll be fined. To add insult to injury the government is urging everyone not to use internet from 9am to 6pm .
TRANSCRIPT AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/futurev… If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.
People have had trouble making this link work, so if it doesn’t for you, type the address into your browser then search the site using ‘tiffany dover’. The author there provides a few insights and possible conclusions. Opinion of course but worth considering. EWR
This article here is likely in order to persuade you to take the coming untested vaccine just in case you’re having second thoughts. My previous post about violations of the Nuremberg code got ‘fact checked’ as false info … I don’t buy it. Arguing over is it or isn’t it in violation is besides the point. What the fact checkers say is it is only in violation of experimental ethics, not in the case of a safe vaccine. Well one could easily make a case for this being experimental in that the vaccine has been inadequately tested. They have by passed animal testing. We appear in this case to be the said guinea pigs. People must be allowed to decline consent for any medical procedure … for any treatment of their bodies particularly in the case of untested interventions that have not been proven 100% safe. If this vaccine is safe enough as touted, why have the Pharmaceutical companies been given immunity from prosecution for damages? The propaganda piece below is simply to persuade you it’s all safe.
What the public want is reassurance these people do not plan to make it mandatory. EWR
boomlive.in
Medical ethics and legal experts said the principles, named after the Nuremberg trials, are compatible with vaccination.
Facebook and Instagram posts shared thousands of times claim that vaccines directly violate the Nuremberg Code, a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation established after World War II. This claim is false; medical ethics and legal experts said the principles, named after the Nuremberg trials, are compatible with vaccination. “Vaccines are in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code,” a flyer photographed and shared on Facebook in Canada on May 25, 2020 warns.
Having just had the NZ vax roll out announced this item is right on cue. Can you see the script? The globalists are running most if not all the countries on the planet, from within the shadows of course … the script applies everywhere. In this case it’s Ireland.
Note they are downplaying the side effects, it surely is not what whistleblowers have been telling us. There were people in the trials died however according to the Irish officials the reactions will be ‘mild’, a ‘fever’ maybe.
“The chief executive of the Health Products Regulatory Authority, Dr Lorraine Nolan, said it is “simply not possible” to say the vaccine will be “completely risk-free”.
However, Dr Nolan said if there are reactions they will be mild, such as a fever.
She said the probability of a negative reaction to the vaccine is less than one in a 100,000. She said this should be compared with the 8pc of people who end up in hospital with serious conditions after contracting Covid-19.
“The basis of the disease itself far outweighs any potential effects associated with the vaccine,” she added.” _____________________________________________________________________
Government to assess impact of vaccination programme before deciding how certificates will be used.
Vaccine certificates may be needed to attend social gatherings or sporting events once the majority of the population are vaccinated.
At the launch of the National Covid-19 Vaccination Programme, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly said certificates could play a key role in the fight against coronavirus if the vaccine significantly reduces transmission of the disease.
CNN has the story. And it’s quite a story: “Why vaccinate our most frail? Odd vote out shows the dilemma”, December 4. [1]
“The vote to recommend long-term care residents be among the first to receive Covid-19 vaccinations was not unanimous.”
“Out of a panel of 14 CDC vaccine advisers, a lone doctor said no.”
“’Odd woman out, I guess,’ Dr. Helen ‘Keipp’ Talbot, of Vanderbilt University, told her colleagues. ‘I still struggle with this. This was not an easy vote’.”
“Talbot was worried about whether the vaccine would even work in such frail, vulnerable patients. Even more, she worried about how it might look if the vaccine failed in that group, or how it would affect public perception if residents died soon after getting the vaccine.”
“The Covid-19 vaccines have not been tested in the frail elderly, many of whom are residents of long-term care facilities.”
Let’s stop here for a moment. First, we learn that the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine have not used the frail and elderly as volunteers. Therefore, there is NO evidence that the vaccine is safe or effective in that very large group. If this doesn’t give the frail and elderly and their families pause for thought, nothing will.
Second, Dr. Talbot is worried about “public perception,” when the elderly die right after getting the vaccination.
Well, what would YOU think if your mother died the day after she received the COVID shot?
The CNN article gets worse. Read on. Next up is a comment from Dr. Kelly Moore, “associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.”
“The Canadian Forces is investigating after one of its members spoke at an anti-lockdown rally in Toronto on the weekend and called on military personnel to disobey orders to help in the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine.”
Thanks to the FlyingCuttlefish blog for this link. At 9 minutes in the video hear immunologist and toxicologist Prof. Stefan Hockertz give evidence about the untested Pfizer vaccine for covid to the German Corona Committee, which includes lawyer Reiner Fuellmich.
TRANSCRIPT: It is about “vaccines that could eventually be compulsory or forced on us by social pressure and those from BioNTech and Pfizer which have received an authorisation for use in the UK. Interestingly, in a country which 3 or 4 weeks ago made us aware about a public tender showing new computer and server capacity must be provided in order to handle the sheer number of side effect reports that are expected through using such an mRNA vaccine.
We have neither a phase 1 or a phase 2 reasonably carried out so my accusation is much more serious. Safety, efficacy & quality checks in the pre-clinical areas haven’t been done at all. And this is the real crime. This work MUST be done and it has totally NOT BEEN DONE. This whole system must be tested in animals which are suitable, and this must first be determined … by examining the liver, the kidneys etc., the complete histology has to be looked into, a very elaborate aspect, and naturally the function, especially of the immune system must be proven. None of this has been done. Definitively there is no toxicological data available. I know this for two reasons, firstly I have asked BioNTech several times with no reply. If there was any data they could at least have told me that the experiments were done. They wrote to inform me quite clearly that they have “no data available yet”. This came from a Senior Medical Director who is responsible for the total phase of the trial. This for me is a kind of proof on the one hand of silence … meaning … “we don’t have anything”, and on the other hand they are indeed admitting that they have nothing. This means we are making experiments on people without knowing the safety of the product.”
EXCERPT – “Professor Nikolai Petrovsky of Flinders University Adelaide, is also on the record as saying he would not take it. Professor Petrovsky and a team at Flinders, have developed their own COVID-19 vaccine that has the highest safety rating worldwide, but has been ignored by the Morrison government. Go figure. Pfizer has all the dollars, right? They also have no legal liability for damages.”
SCOTT Morrison and the public health establishment’s beloved Pfizer vaccines are dangerous for anyone who is uninformed enough to willingly get one, and two former Pfizer scientists who went to court in Europe trying to stop the trials can attest to this, as do other highly qualified scientists.
Excerpt: “The first covid-19 vaccine victim to have suffered brain damage has been reported in India a few months after being vaccinated, which is why test subjects are observed for only one or two months by vaccine producers and regulatory agencies.”
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.
Concern is growing that an innovative nanotech device developed at Johns Hopkins University may be used to secretly deliver the COVID19 vaccine to those people who are “vaccine hesitant.”
Certainly, the technology is real, but is there any merit to such a claim?
Patrick Smith (November 25, 2020) writing for hub.jhu.edu explains:
Inspired by a parasitic worm that digs its sharp teeth into its host’s intestines, Johns Hopkins researchers have designed tiny, star-shaped microdevices that can latch onto intestinal mucosa and release drugs into the body.
David Gracias, a professor in the Whiting School of Engineering, and gastroenterologist Florin M. Selaru, director of the Johns Hopkins Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, led a team of researchers and biomedical engineers that designed and tested shape-changing microdevices that mimic the way the parasitic hookworm affixes itself to an organism’s intestines.
Called “theragrippers” these tiny devices are made of metal and a thin, shape-changing film. They are coated in heat-sensitive paraffin wax and each is no bigger than a speck of dust (see image below).
Even the inventors of this microtechnology admit it can potentially transport any drug and release it gradually into your body and you won’t even know anything about it.
Check out the video raising the alarm on Bitchute:
What reason would there be to engage in mass deception to secretly deliver a vaccine to defeat the coronavirus pandemic?
Surveys have been revealing a marked drop in public confidence that vaccines are really worth the risk.
In 2019, the World Health Organization listed vaccine hesitancy as a top ten threat to global health. Only half of surveyed American adults would receive a coronavirus vaccine if it were available today. That number is down precipitously from over 70 percent since May 2020.
But the real concern for policymakers and the vaccine lobby is that there is a huge surge in the medical professions AGAINST vaccines with just 40 percent of health care workers saying they were likely to get vaccinated.
But all such reluctance against the COVID jab will be in vain if a vaccine can be delivered by stealth merely when anyone takes the now ubiquitous PCR swab test (photo, top). The claim is that the dust-sized “theragrippers” can be implanted in the tips of PCR test swabs and be delivered to the innocent ‘”victim.”
It may be utterly immoral – and likely illegal – but it is certainly feasible because the Hopkins team published results of an animal study this week as the cover article in the journal Science Advances.
Thousands of these sinister miniature theragrippers can be deployed in the GI tract via a simple, innocent swab given as part of the COVID19 test already taken by millions worldwide. Quite simply, you wouldn’t feel a thing!
When the paraffin wax coating on the grippers reaches the temperature inside the body, the devices close autonomously and clamp onto the colonic wall.
The closing action causes the tiny, six-pointed devices to dig into the mucosa and remain attached to the colon, where they are retained and release their medicine payloads gradually into the body.
Eventually, the theragrippers lose their hold on the tissue and are cleared from the intestine via normal gastrointestinal muscular function.
Absent any evidence to the contrary, are we to believe we have nothing to fear from being ‘poisoned’ by the tiny critters?
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.
As anti-lockdown protests continue to rage in London, resulting in the arrests of over 150 this past weekend, The Sunday Times is out with a hugely alarming report that almost has to be seen to be believed given how open and brazen an example it is of the state using every means possible to crush free speech and independent thought.
Britain will literally use military intelligence to seek out and stamp out what The Timescalls “anti-vaccine militants” and related “propaganda content” in cyberspace.
Of course, it’s entirely open to state authorities’ interpretation as to what this even means, and will likely morph into cracking down on any speech that’s even remotely critical or questioning as to the potential harmful side effects of the new rapidly developed COVID-19 vaccines.
See where they are taking you. All in plain sight. A blind man could tell you with the events of the past 6 months that a vaccine for an illness that has a zero point zero zero something death rate & a 99 point something rate of survival surely has another agenda. You need to ask yourself why the rush and listen to the many health professionals speaking out (& censored). All this under the recommendation of a man with no health qualification whatsoever & who also stands to make mega bucks from it. All that aside from the real end game. Money is just one of the perks. EWR
Yes the image is frightening but really this is where they are heading. They want us all jabbed, period. Listen to Bill Gates on that one. I’ve no problem with those who want the jab, their choice, but taking away the freedom to choose one’s own health protocols is fascist. The NZ govt has not ruled out mandatory. And besides, there are other roads to that objective as we’ve already heard … no jab no job.
‘They’ have been warning us I note in more than one article I’ve seen, of impending problems (all the while assuring us it’s safe). Two that stand out in my memory are 1) may be followed by Chronic Fatigue Syndrome known as CFS (but then Dr Judy Mikovits discovered CFS in the vaccines anyway & was jailed for that remember … and the video exposing that banned) and 2) there may be injuries / reactions … and they are rolling all this out as fast as their corrupt tactics will allow. A vaccine can normally take 4 years and beyond to develop … not these people. Let’s develop a risky vaccine to cure an illness with a 99 point something survival rate. Still I note many continue to adhere to the mainstream narrative with ne’er a question. Be it on their own heads. EWR
(Natural News) You’re seeing the reports all over the news: Pfizer’s new coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C (-94F), which is much colder than the North Pole. If it’s not stored at this temperature, its ingredients begin to break down and it fails to work. Currently Pfizer is claiming, without evidence, that its vaccine is “90% effective.” But this claim is little more than corporate propaganda designed to drive up stock prices through false projections.
But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70C in the first place?
The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before.
As Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”
The CDC’s recommended schedule of vaccines include 50 doses of 14 vaccines for children between day of birth and age 6, some of which may increase the risk of meningitis; six were found to increase the risk of mortality
Meningitis is an inflammation of the membranes around the brain and spinal cord. It can be triggered by an infection, certain drugs, cancer and parasites
The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System is a database of voluntary reports of vaccine injury, disability and death; yet the U.S. government has shielded vaccine manufacturers from civil liability from these injuries
It is vital to get involved at the local level where decisions are made for your area to protect your right to make vaccine choices. By becoming a user of the free online NVIC Advocacy portal you’ll have access to the information you need about vaccine legislation to take action to protect the legal right to make voluntary decisions about vaccination
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration maintain a database of information about adverse effects from the administration of vaccines licensed in the U.S. The database is called the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),1 a federally operated program created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
One study published in the journal Neurology evaluated data from VAERS to look at the rate of occurrence of meningitis after vaccines were administered to individuals from infancy to 74.7 years. Reports were pulled from 1990 to 2010 looking at the onset of meningitis within six weeks after an individual was vaccinated.
They found 722 cases. Of these, 415 (57.5%) occurred in the first six weeks and 327 (45.2%) occurred within the first two weeks. In the group, 76% of the individuals were hospitalized and 6.9% were disabled after the infection cleared. Meningitis was reported after several types of vaccinations.
Welcome back to New World Next Week — the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week: Story #1: How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged https://bit.ly/3ecZiev Singapore Halts Dosing of Two Flu Shots After 59 Deaths in South Korea https://bit.ly/3jDMSxx Japan Gov’t OKs Bill to Offer Free Coronavirus Vaccines https://bit.ly/2Jhqhdy Danish Newspaper Reveals Largest Study On Masks Rejected By Three Medical Journals https://bit.ly/37OCaBM That Mask Is Giving You Lung Cancer https://bit.ly/3jLEr3j FDA Approves Gilead’s Remdesivir Despite Data Showing Drug Doesn’t Work https://bit.ly/2Jg0aUm Some COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates May Make People More Vulnerable to HIV https://bit.ly/3oDjRpm South Korean Authorities Stick To Flu Vaccine Plan After Deaths Rise To 48 https://bit.ly/37WeDiF Deaths In South Korea After Flu Vaccinations Shouldn’t Stop Flu Shot Campaigns https://bit.ly/34EKYIK Time Magazine Replaces Logo With Plea to ‘Vote’ https://bit.ly/35FQEBy Story #2: The Great Financial Reset – IMF Managing Director Calls for a ‘New Bretton Woods Moment’ https://bit.ly/34CTlEr A New Bretton Woods Moment By Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director https://bit.ly/3jxoyNC Cross-Border Payment—A Vision for the Future https://bit.ly/3jDHfPM Story #3: ‘The Purge’ Producers ‘Keep America Great’ Inside the Trump Admin https://bit.ly/31PZpYq Hiltzik Strategies https://bit.ly/31TGf3T Jared Kushner Hires Hollywood Horror Film Publicist Behind ‘The Purge’ to Head PR For New White House Office http://dailym.ai/3kEFG5x Trump Adviser Hope Hicks Tests Positive for Coronavirus https://bit.ly/3jDLISr Biden, 5 Supreme Court Justices Attend Controversial “Red Mass” (Oct. 3, 2010) https://cnn.it/31QI95x Film, Literature and the New World Order: ‘The Purge: Election Year’ https://bit.ly/2Jkbkrj Bob Murphy Analyzes “The Hunt” and “The Purge” Movies as an Anarchist https://bit.ly/3mwKA4T You can help support our independent and non-commercial work by visiting http://CorbettReport.com/Support & http://MediaMonarchy.com/Join. Those in the US who want to support our work can send cash, check or money order (payable to James Evan Pilato) to: Media Monarchy c/o James Evan Pilato P.O. Box 22486 Santa Fe, NM 87502-2486 Thank You.
The video below shows Australian lawyer Peter Little presenting this information at the Police Headquarters in Melbourne. He questions also the Govt failure to monitor influenza and the disappearance of records about the Rain-Making Control Act 1967.
An excerpt below from their letter to the NSW Police Commissioner (copied plus link to full letter below):
“Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-
•Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines; •The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines; •Police do not participate in anyway in the forcing of vaccines upon the population; •That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated •To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and •To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government”
Reporting THEFT of Rain-making Control Act 1967 archives ; PLUS RECRUIT VIC POLICE to join the 70 NSW whistleblower cops called COPS FOR COVID TRUTH ; plus report Conspiracy admitted by Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt that the government is lying about flu stats and failing to do the required surveillance of flu viruses { bumped into Channel 9 reporter at the start of live and gave him the NSW police whistleblower document}
(Apologies for the editing … pdf copied to keep from losing the link however if you download the original it is better reading … EWR)
1| P a g e
October 26, 2020
To: Michael Fuller Police Commissioner of New South Wales
RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions. We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules.Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus. With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1]and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to150,000 Australian deaths[2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply. With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”.[3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing. We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors,such that experts who later reviewed it have said”no serious scientist gives (it) any validity”. [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”,because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results. Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response.
2| P a g e
For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic[9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immunocompromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12] At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14] Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting. Here are some statistics which reflect this reality: –
3| P a g e
Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding: -The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.
4| P a g e
We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses.In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing. We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” [15] So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality ofthe situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18] What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19[19],when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22]. Instead,the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca[23]and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives. AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims,kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine[25]. Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed. All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable. We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring. Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.
5| P a g e
These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first). There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework. Article 7 of the international convention of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”[31]Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33] Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency be valid.” [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36]. Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-
•Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines; •The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines; •Police do not participate in anyway in the forcing of vaccines upon the population; •That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated •To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and •To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government. Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public
6| P a g e
intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government[38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules. We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: – Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which: ▪Places integrity above all; ▪Upholds the rule of law; ▪Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals; ▪Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing; ▪Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction; ▪Capitalises on the wealth of human resources; ▪Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and ▪Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly. Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence. We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth. With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust,by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.
RegardsAlexander Cooney
Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station 5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460
Americans have been following COVID-19 vaccine trial developments for weeks, watching companies jockey for frontrunner status like contestants in a reality TV show. And though participants in some of the studies (by Moderna, Oxford, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer) have surfaced with reactions serious enough to pause several of the trials, market analysts remain “bullish” about the near-term prospects for approval of these liability-free products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Law enforcement has the legal power ‘to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing’ if it’s determined that that person must be vaccinated.
WESTERN AUSTRALIA, September 24, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — The state of Western Australia has legislated to allow police officers or other “authorised officers” to restrain individuals and, if deemed necessary, forcibly remove their underwear in order to administer a vaccine.
LifeSiteNews recently became aware of the legislation and is in communication with a number of residents of Western Australia who, until recently, were unaware of the extraordinary powers granted to the government in state law.
The so-called “reasonable force” includes the powers to:
(a) to apprehend and detain the person to whom the direction applies (the relevant person) and take the relevant person to a place where the person is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(b) to detain the relevant person at the place where he or she is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(c) to restrain the relevant person —
(i) to enable a medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out; or
(ii) to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated;
(d) to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing, if —
(i) the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary to enable a medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out or, as the case requires, to enable the person to be vaccinated; and
(ii) the relevant person is given a reasonable opportunity to remove the thing himself or herself, and refuses or fails to do so.
An Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) “fact check” article on the issue was published in June this year when some social media–users first became aware of the legislation and raised alarm online.
The ABC article states that “[t]hese powers are only enforceable under a public health state of emergency, as was declared in Western Australia on 23 March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Dr. Rocco Loiacono, senior lecturer at the Curtin Law School in Western Australia, told LifeSiteNews that “there is no basis for any public health emergency since there has not been any community transmission of the virus in WA since early April!”
“The government should have declared the emergency over months ago,” Loiacono said, “but of course they will not now relinquish these newfound powers.”
Last month, Australian prime minister Scott Morrison announced that his government had made an agreement with the British pharmaceutical company Astrazeneca to supply Australians with their coronavirus vaccine for free, providing that the vaccine passes clinical trials. A few weeks after Morrison’s statement, worldwide trials for Astrazeneca’s coronavirus vaccine, which uses cell lines from an aborted baby, were temporarily stopped after a U.K. trial participant was taken ill.
Shortly after announcing the agreement with Astrazeneca, Morrison first said a coronavirus vaccine will be made “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” before quickly walking back the comments somewhat and saying the vaccine “is not going to be compulsory” and that “we can’t hold someone down and make them take it.”
Delivery firms have received guidance from Trump administration officials to prepare freezer farms in the heartland and get ready to load vaccines onto trucks no later than Nov. 1.
I told you months ago to be ready for the time when the vaccines begin to roll out, because there will be many, many companies and organizations pushing one and the pressure for you to begin receiving the shots will be intense. Just think how much pressure has been applied to get you to wear a mask everywhere you go, multiply that by a factor of 100, and you will be just about there. Now we have a time frame, the beginning of November. Isn’t it funny how the real driver of science always seems to be politics? But I digress.
We were told in the beginning that everyone on earth will need to receive a vaccination in order to ‘beat COVID’, then after they let us chew on that for awhile, they told us that a single shot was suddenly not enough. (Imagine that, no vaccine yet available and already they determined that one won’t do the trick.) They say we now need to receive multiple shots, and the CDC has ordered the nation’s governor’s to begin creating Vaccine Distribution Sites. Will the biometric digital identification be done in the same location, I wonder? So many questions, so little time, and it gets worse.
The Outer Light
{ bumped into Channel 9 reporter at the start of live and gave him the NSW police whistleblower document}
You must be logged in to post a comment.