All posts by Pam Vernon

I'm for justice and equity for all peoples everywhere. I am also for exposing lies and corruption, particularly the lies of the corporations that have a tight grip on humanity, all for profit and control. A grip that has been instrumental in the rape and pillage of indigenous peoples planet wide, for centuries.
Banking

What happens when your bank isn’t really a bank?

Leave a comment

From Our Greater Destiny Blog @ substack

Disclaimer

I personally do not advocate any process or procedure contained in any of my Blogs. Information presented here is not intended to provide legal or lawful advice, nor medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, cure, or prevent any disease. Views expressed are for educational purposes only.

Another bank outage just left millions Of Americans w/out money

Dec 06.24

A catastrophic bank failure wiped out the life savings of thousands of American families this month, after a fintech bank operator went belly-up and disappeared with the money of its customers. Court documents suggest that up to 10 million accounts were affected, but regulators say there is nothing they can do to solve the problem. The U.S. banking system is crumbling, and today, we are going to reveal another facet of the ongoing collapse. 14:47 mins

Synapse Collapse: The Unfolding Nightmare

The fintech banking operator Synapse has imploded, leaving up to 10 million accounts drained and families financially annihilated. As regulators stand idly by, shrugging off responsibility, and nearly $300 million in deposits hang in limbo, the cracks in the U.S. banking system have split wide open. It’s time to face the grim reality: the system is failing, and millions are paying the price. https://amg-news.com/breaking-another-bank-outage-has-just-left-millions-of-americans-without-money-epic-economist-video/

Release the ‘Bond’ Age

Not only is there an almost total lack of knowledge about how our monetary system currently works or even how it worked historically, a dangerous misunderstanding has been fostered — intentionally, it would seem. As a result, the actions we take (in the hope of fixing our economy) are likely to have precisely the opposite effect. This is the inevitable — and anticipated — final stage of that Great Reset transition, however things unfold.

Whether the system collapses of its own accord (as Ponzi Schemes do), or is intentionally collapsed at an opportune moment (as those bankers have often done) — or is unintentionally collapsed, the result of actions taken by well-meaning yet uncomprehending politicians — the results will be (essentially) the same: a massive contraction of the money supply and an equally massive transfer of assets from those without money to those with money. Continue at https://wdavidward.substack.com/p/be-released-from-the-bond-age

Edward Dowd posted

For those that that haven’t figured this out yet aren’t going to make it.

The matrix control system

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood is why I published The Matrix series Part I and Part II. To make sense of what’s going on in society requires an understanding of the influence non-physical interdimensional beings have on planet Earth. TY!

Thanks for reading Our Greater Destiny Blog! This post is public so feel free to share it.

News, Treaty of Waitangi

Seymour’s principles of privatisation

10 Comments

by Ryan Ward
@ E-TANGATA

This totally makes sense. Drawing attention here to the Atlas Network & the Mont Pelerin Society. Perchance you are wondering who they are, I’ve included videos below the article, interviews on topic from Central News UTS and discussions with Dr Jeremy Walker (Australia) who has written extensively on topic. He is also interviewed by DOC Studios @ Youtube, with a particular focus on NZ. Shining a light on Seymour’s connection to the network. EWNZ

“…why those opposing the bill should be taking every opportunity to hammer home to the public the corporate ties held by Seymour and his backers and their intention to extract Aotearoa’s resources and siphon the profits to the wealthy here in New Zealand and to international corporations. It’s not about equality, it’s about opening up New Zealand to corporate exploitation.”

David Seymour’s Treaty principles bill is now in select committee phase, and open for submissions.

National and New Zealand First claim they won’t support it going further, but public opposition will need to be clear and overwhelming to ensure it doesn’t proceed.

If the bill went to referendum, current polling suggests it would have a good chance of passing, with 36 percent of the public supporting redefining the Treaty principles, and 30 percent undecided.

For those opposed, there are a few important things to consider, writes Ryan Ward.

We can expect an all-out propaganda campaign in favour of the bill.

This will be led by right-wing lobbying groups like Hobson’s Pledge, the Taxpayer’s Union, Groundswell, and others. Hobson’s Pledge has already indicated they have tens of thousands of submissions in favour of the bill ready to go and will be soliciting many more. They and other lobbying groups will also blitz the media with ads and messaging in favour of the bill.

David Seymour has been laying the groundwork for this campaign all along. His consistent and careful messaging surrounding the bill has framed its goal as providing equal rights to all New Zealanders, rather than giving special rights to different groups depending on their ancestry.

He has repeated this message over and over. According to Seymour, it’s about democracy and fairness.

This political messaging will be extremely difficult to counter using the predominant oppositional messaging which focuses on the bill’s racism or ignorant interpretation of the translation or meaning of the Treaty.

It will not be enough to loudly proclaim that the bill is racist toward Māori (it is very much so) or that Seymour is ignorant of the true meaning of the Treaty (he is not).

As evidenced by his dismissal of expert opinion and the haka and protest in parliament, and his minimisation of the hīkoi last week (possibly the largest protest in New Zealand’s history), Seymour is unmoved by factual argument or large shows of public disapproval. (A petition against his bill currently has just over 290,000 signatures, more than the 246,000 people who supported Act in the last election.)

By framing his bill in terms of “equality for all”, David Seymour has shrewdly tapped into the existing racial biases that have successfully torpedoed recent attempts to provide more representation and equity for Māori.

Much of the campaign messaging in the last election by Act, National, and New Zealand First railed against ideas of “co-governance” and unequal treatment of Māori at the expense of the rest of New Zealand. Seymour and his backers will continue to use this divisive rhetoric to turn the public against Māori and in favour of the bill. The recent Voice referendum in Australia and our own recent election results indicate that the public is very vulnerable to this type of dishonest and divisive political messaging.

Getting sucked into the race-war rhetoric that Seymour and his backers are trafficking in has been a losing strategy so far. It puts the opposition on the defensive: the disingenuous arguments about equality for all New Zealanders seem to place Seymour and his bill on an obvious moral high ground and are very difficult to counter effectively.

As Seymour said at the bill’s first reading: “The challenge for people who oppose this bill is to explain why they are so opposed to those basic principles.” We already know how difficult it is to win against such disingenuous framing.

Those opposing the bill need to find another political message that will resonate with the public. A simple message that can’t be co-opted by leveraging entrenched racial biases and relying on the public to understand complex legal and translational arguments.

A recent editorial in the Spinoff by Rupert O’Brien pulls the curtain back on Seymour’s dissembling language of equality and provides an offensive rather than a defensive oppositional rhetorical strategy.

O’Brien notes that while most of the discussion and analysis of the bill has been related to whether it accurately interprets the meaning of Te Tiriti, the real motive behind the bill is related to Act and its backers’ long-term strategy of deregulating business and opening up New Zealand to corporate investment, extraction, and exploitation.

As O’Brien writes, Act and their benefactors “know that it [Te Tiriti] stands as a major obstacle in their goal of deregulation and promoting laissez-faire economics.”

“They aim to achieve deregulation by, in part, turning government departments into state-owned enterprises (corporatising) and subsequently selling these as going concerns on the private market (privatising) . . .

“The Treaty principles have proved a significant roadblock to both corporatisation and privatisation in the past and present a clear threat to any plans of future development of public assets to the private sector.”

This is likely the real, though unspoken, reason that Seymour and his backers are pushing so hard to redefine the Treaty principles. By framing the bill as a means for equality for all New Zealanders, and then inflaming the race-war rhetoric that results from the justified outrage from Māori, Seymour can avoid discussing the real reasons behind the bill and his ties to domestic and international corporate interests that will profit handsomely from opening up Aotearoa to unregulated corporate development. Industries such as gas and mining have been long stymied by the legal interpretation and enforcement of the Treaty.

Focusing on the race war stops the public from “following the money”, as the saying goes.

But the money has been followed. And it leads to domestic and international right-wing lobbying and funding groups whose main goal is to enact policy that results in upwards wealth transfer and corporate exploitation. Many of Act’s largest donors are individuals such as Graeme Hart and the Gibbs family, who profited handsomely from the privatisation of New Zealand’s public sector in the 1990s under National.

There is a reason why Seymour desperately wants to keep the real motivations for his Treaty principles bill secret. The public generally don’t look favourably on politicians and political agendas that are blatantly in favour of corporate interests at the expense of the rest of us. If the real reason for the bill were made clear and widely known, the current framing would crumble, and the equality-race-war rhetoric would no longer likely be an effective strategy to win public support for the bill.

This is why an oppositional strategy focused only on the race-war rhetoric will fail, and why those opposing the bill should be taking every opportunity to hammer home to the public the corporate ties held by Seymour and his backers and their intention to extract Aotearoa’s resources and siphon the profits to the wealthy here in New Zealand and to international corporations.

It’s not about equality, it’s about opening up New Zealand to corporate exploitation.

By making this crystal clear to the public, and focusing relentlessly on a simple oppositional message, we can unite Aotearoa and turn the tide against Seymour and his reinterpretation of the Treaty principles.

Ryan Ward is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Psychology at the University of Otago.

E-Tangata, 2024

VIDEO & OTHER LINKS BELOW: (content warning, the DOC Studios videos do contain a few expletives)

The Atlas Network: Big oil, climate disinformation and constitutional democracy (includes Dr Jeremy Walker) From Central News UTS

David Seymour and Debbie Ngawera Packer on Q&A | Jeremy Walker on if Atlas is involved (Dr Walker begins at 1hr 11 mins)

 

Further info from Dr Jeremy Walker who has written extensively on topic drawing the public attention to the Atlas Group (posted @ Central News UTS) :

Further resources and tips on Atlas from Dr Jeremy Walker. Please disseminate where useful. Some tips on research methods for researching the Atlas Network’s global reach and organisation in specific countries and regions. A key insight was provided to me by Mirowski and Plewhe’s (2009) Road from Mont Pelerin, which defines a “neoliberal” as one of the membership of the global Mont Pelerin Society and/or of the thinktanks of the Atlas Network (p. 4). That book focuses mainly on the ‘economic ideas’ of Hayek, Friedman et al. in Western countries, but as my book More Heat than Life (2020) shows, these ‘ideas’ were paid for by oil money from the beginning, and promoted by oil money via the ever-growing network of thinktanks modelled on the original, the IEA (London) which almost from the beginning was supported by Big Oil, uranium, banking etc, as its seems most of the later clone ‘thinktanks’ are or were where we have any data. The senior exec directors of Atlas orgs are often MPS members. DeSmog has a list of MPS members including the date they were admitted as at 2013. You will find Alan Gibbs under the UK section. https://www.desmog.com/wp-content/uploads/files/Mont%20Pelerin%20Society%202013-membership-listing_Redacted.pdf

Very interesting names on it, including Charles Koch who has ploughed untold millions into the Network, also for example Aust PM John Howard. Wayback machine is vital, Atlas posted their global directory on their website until c. 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210824142756/https://www.atlasnetwork.org/partners/global-directory

There is plenty to learn from searching the Atlas site itself. You should also use Wayback to explore deleted material from individual websites. On the basis of that list a team of researchers based at DeMontford has compiled this very important database which: “contains the name and roles of board members, supervisory board members, academic advisory boards, and CEO’s of all think tank organisations that are part of the Atlas Network/Atlas Economic Research Foundation between January 2021 and December 2022. The dataset covers each continent under separate sections for individual continent analysis. https://figshare.dmu.ac.uk/articles/dataset/Atlas_Think_Tank_Main_Employers/22217050?file=39486961

Search for academic literature on neoliberalism, Mont Pelerin Society, and the names in the MPS directory, but Atlas Network as such as very limited exposure. As far as I know no one has published on the basis of this archive, like the MPS records, at the Hoover Institution. https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c80k2f0h/

DeSmog has the best resources on various thinktanks and the hacks that work for them, but yet to fully incorporate the Atlas dimension as they have only recently grasped this. Eg. ‘the Koch network’ is more or less on overlap of the US Atlas orgs, as oil billionaire Charles Koch has been on the Atlas board to my knowledge since 1987, and is a key funder of George Mason University where the head office is based. Also useful is SourceWatch, LittleSis https://www.desmog.com/databases/

Robert Brulle’s paper’s on the funding of climate denial orgs in the US is very useful, although likewise confined to the US and not cognisant until recently that nearly all the orgs named are in fact Atlas affiliates, spinoff orgs, and/or staffed and funded by the same set of ‘philanthropies’, including Donor’s Trust (set up by Atlas HQ to disguise donors identities) and the various Scaife and Koch foundations, as well as others named in Jane Mayer’s Dark Money (Olin, Bradley). https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=PlB0bM4AAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate

Esp these two: https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-178750/v1/77e68e86-364d-45b5-b426-b0355e605d70.pdf?c=1631873834https://www.activist360.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Institutionalizing-Delay-Climatic-Change.pdf

Below are links to an online version of my book, and two subsequent pieces showing the method above used in the Australian context and some of the sources in the bibliography may be useful. Walker, J (2023) Silencing the Voice: the fossil-fuelled Atlas Network’s campaign against constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australia, Cosmopolitan Civil Societies,15(2). (Open Access) https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/mcs/article/view/8813

Walker, J (2022) Freedom to burn: mining propaganda, fossil capital and the Australian neoliberals. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359443471_Freedom_to_Burn_Mining_Propaganda_Fossil_Capital_and_the_Australian_Neoliberals

In Slobodian, Q & Plehwe, D (eds) Market Civilisations: Neoliberals East and South, Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9781942130673/market-civilizations

Walker, J (2020). More Heat than Life: the Tangled Roots of Ecology, Energy and Economics, Palgrave. https://archive.org/details/walker-more-heat-then-life.-the-tangled-roots-of-ecology-energy-and-economics-2020/page/259/mode/2up?q=atlas

Image Credit: By Glenn Davies – Own work, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=136317457

 

pandemic

The removal of poultry and eggs from your food supply (as NZ authorities poise to cull 80K chickens)

2 Comments

‘Since early October, the WHO and U.S. health authorities, including the FDA, NIH, CDC, and BARDA, have been actively discussing the pandemic potential of H5N1, a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus’. (Brett Hawes, ONWARD @ substack).

I expect we’ll be needing a ‘safe & effective’ for that?

READ AT THE LINK

Image by pixabay.com

Land

Correcting the inequities – the raw injustice of perpetual leases of Māori lands

Leave a comment

“Imagine the government leasing your land to someone else, against your wishes, and with an endless right of renewal. You remain the owner in name only. You can’t use it, you can’t cancel the lease and you can’t charge a market rent. For over a century, Māori landowners have had to live with perpetual leases they never agreed to … how does that not create stress, bitterness, hurt, anger, hopelessness … and despite decades of opposition, successive governments have failed to bring them to an end.

If a group of Remuera land owners went to their member of Parliament and said my land’s been leased for a hundred and twenty years, I didn’t agree to it, I can’t stop it, there’d be some outrage. There might be a law change”.

This scenario is a seldom told story. It wasn’t in our educational texts. This and others like it (witness the land-locked Māori lands that cannot be accessed) have been tucked away under tomes of verbiage that those who would control us prefer we didn’t know. An underlying agenda of dividing the populace ensures we don’t unite. Listen with an open mind and have a heart for those affected. Nobody has the will to correct this situation. Lands taken illegally then tied up in long term (perpetual) leases that the owners cannot extricate themselves from. They even pay for the administration of this monstrosity of illegalities. How so? It is unjust. It is not right. And remember, those affected who try to tell the world, they are immediately accused of wanting special treatment. In this instance it should be one rule for all.

Where are all the ‘one rule’ advocates?

Listen at the LINK

RELATED: Māori locked out of whenua by perpetual leases continue fight against legislation

Note: I’ve reposted this story because the original attempt at adding explanatory text (among other things!) failed. For those who watched the original, thank you… for those who didn’t, the info may surprise you. EWNZ

Image by Monique Berry from Pixabay

 

News

Apologies for the multiple emails!

12 Comments

A quick post to apologize. I’m having difficulties with the WP editor/s grrr. Wouldn’t save, wouldn’t embed, on and on… I deleted each time but forgot that each time, an email would go out.

Couldn’t even reply to the person (bastrazu) who complained, or approve their comment. None of this has been intentional.

Please bear with me …

Image by Andrew Martin from Pixabay

News

One Law for All?

Leave a comment

Perpetual leases are land grabs in poor disguise. Lands taken from Māori over 100 years back, tied up in perpetual leases that are handed down from generation to generation so the owners cannot their lands back short of spending millions to recover improvements made. In this video the whānau of a man who went off to fight for NZ in WW1 returned to find their lands taken. Some of his descendants are now homeless! This is not a one off exceptional story. If you care to watch the video the same pattern repeats over in the Taranaki. Keen to hear from the ‘one rule for all’ brigade. The government has no will to correct this. As the woman from this whānau points out, the land was taken by the stroke of a pen, it could be returned by the same. EWNZ

euthanasia

Canada now offering Assisted SUICIDE to Vax-Injured Victims

Leave a comment

From Stew Peters @ Rumble

Dr. William Makis joins Stew to discuss how Canada is now offering assisted suicide to victims of the safe and effective !

The world needs to know the truth that fake history has concealed. WATCH Old World Order, and find out more at: https://stewpeters.com/owo/

VIDEO AT THIS LINK

See also:

Canada’s euthanasia programme offers the MAiD “treatment” to cancer patients waiting on long lists to see an oncologist

Facts Everyone Should Know about Euthanasia

Further articles on euthanasia HERE

 
News, Vaccines

How to turn edible plants into mRNA vaccine factories: yes the University of California is studying this right now with US tax dollars

6 Comments

NOTE: They do intend to infect you one way or another. Watch all injectables. EWNZ

From Exposing the Darkness @ substack

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT: Our Food Is About To Be Poisoned With NEW “Transgenic Edible Vaccines”

They’re Being Funded Right Now BY TAXPAYERS, mRNA Food Vaccine FACTORIES. Kamala Harris Administration has been using US Tax Payer money to fund the development.

Rep. Thomas Massie: “…Does the term ‘Transgenic Edible Vaccines’ sound far-fetched? Well, it’s not. We are funding it. In fact scientists from the University of California, Riverside funded with your tax payer dollars, have been studying whether they can turn edible plants such as lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine factories, thereby creating a Transgenic Edible Vaccine…I don’t think this is a good idea. I don’t think the American people should be funding this…”

Click on the link HERE for the video

Image by Diana Cherry from Pixabay

News, Treaty of Waitangi

How the Treaty ‘principles’ evolved and why they don’t stand up to scrutiny

Leave a comment

By Prof. Jane Kelsey

Analysis: ACT’s bill can be seen as the culmination of moves over several decades by the Crown to use Treaty principles to rewrite te Tiriti and justify its own power, writes Jane Kelsey.

Analysis: ACT Party leader David Seymour has said the goal of his Treaty Principles Bill is to stimulate an overdue conversation on te Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi. At that level at least he has succeeded.

His proposal to rewrite te Tiriti through new legislation has certainly triggered debate – to the point where the most profound constitutional question of all has been asked on the floor of parliament: did Māori cede sovereignty when they signed te Tiriti in 1840?

But the debate has also exposed deep ignorance, among political leaders and many others, about te Tiriti and the more recent concept of Treaty “principles”.

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon fell back on Governor Hobson’s unilateral proclamations of sovereignty in 1840, which relied on what Māori scholar Margaret Mutu calls “the English draft of Hobson’s that Māori never agreed to”.

Meanwhile, Labour leader Chris Hipkins accepts there was no Māori cession of sovereignty, but that somehow the Crown has sovereignty now.

Beyond parliament, inflammatory and easily discredited disinformation about te Tiriti has circulated widely, backed by those who also advocate for the Treaty Principles Bill and its aim to cement into law a fundamental rewriting of te Tiriti.

READ AT THE LINK

RELATED:

Treaty bill plays on ignorance

Why Empires Make Treaties

Photo Credit: By Archives New Zealand from New Zealand – Reconstruction of the Signing of the Treaty of Waitangi, Marcus King, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51249748

News, NZ Government

How to run an efficient state apology

5 Comments

by Connie Buchanan @ E-TANGATA

A very familiar modus operandi that became more glaringly obvious during and after 2020. EWNZ

Giving an apology on behalf of the state is tricky business. Here’s Connie Buchanan with a summary of how to do the bare minimum.

Stay in your own house. Be where you make the rules and feel most at ease. Where there’s plenty of room for you, but limited space for others.

Invite a mere handful of the thousands of survivors who are owed the apology. Put these few in another room of your house. Give them time to respond to the apology that you haven’t yet delivered. Five minutes each. Do not, yourself, go and sit in that room. It was bad enough having to read their horrible stories in the very long report.

While they are responding to the things you haven’t said yet, get ready to deliver the apology. Wear your normal suit like it’s a normal work day. Stand in your normal spot, surrounded by your normal crew. When you’re ready, bring them in from the other room. Make them be quiet. Make them listen. Make them obey the rules of your house. Keep the rest of the thousands at bay on a one-way live stream.

READ MORE AT THE LINK

 

 

Covid-19 experimental injection

All of Canada’s Shrimp and an Unspecified Amount of Swine Are Already Injected With mRNA… US & Aussie to follow

2 Comments

Folk may recall an issue around the time of the experimental injection rollout that many of the injected found their injection sites were magnetic. (See here also).  All quickly dismissed as ‘conspiracy theory’ the usual go-to of those who would hide the truth from you.

Anyway I also recall the magnetism noted in supermarket meat. So reading posts like this one from Exposing the Darkness @ Substack comes as no surprise at all. (What does suprise us these days?) So… Canada’s already injecting their pigs and shrimps… (note the US has been injecting pigs with DNA & RNA since 2017) … what else aren’t they telling us?

While Canada and now also NSW Australia are injecting mRNA into their livestock, Carter County Meats in Montana has taken a stand that they will not be coerced into injecting mRNA gene therapy into their livestock.

U.S. Democrats VOTED DOWN a bill that would have forced all meat products to clearly be labeled if injected mRNA vaccines. DNA and RNA have been in vaccines for pigs in the U.S. since 2017.

John Graff: All of Canada’s Shrimp and an Unspecified Amount of Swine Are Already Injected With mRNA, America Has Been Slated to Follow

I’m adding a related post (in terms of what ‘they’ are doing to the animals) from a NZ writer at substack, Ursula Edgington. Her stack is called Informed Heart. Ursula has noted the application of IOB to the animals. They are (not so) cleverly moved around the paddocks with the use of electronic ‘nudges’….

Famously, Harari wrote about the Internet of Things and how humans are now “hackable animals”. And in The Internet of Bodies is Here (2000) – a report published by (who else?) the World Economic Forum – the authors warn us that:

Recent technological advancements have ushered in a new era of the “internet of bodies” (IoB), with an unprecedented number of connected devices and sensors being affixed to or even implanted and ingested into the [human] body.

Eeeek! No thanks. But it was part of NASA’s Internet of Animals, more specifically cows, that first ‘benefitted’ from the 5G technology in the UK. In New Zealand, the dairy sector contributes $billions to the economy and is one of its most dominant goods export sectors (e.g. China). So it made sense that NZ would be early adopters of a tech that nudges, pings and shocks cows to respond in certain ways to improve output.

5G, AI & Cows: NZ’s Internet of Animals

Header Image with thanks, by StockSnap from Pixabay

 

Vaccines

Alert: US Nurse speaks out about your risks of being injected whilst under anesthetic

10 Comments

This is referring to hospitals in the US and their consent forms. Still in my opinion worth noting going forwards, remembering the sway of big pharma upon all things medical. And given we followed that nation’s protocols if you like during the 4 year plandemic. A nurse is speaking out here about the term ‘Biogenics’ being added into consent forms you will be asked to sign. Turns out that agreeing to the term ‘Biogenics’ means your consent includes any vaccine or other treatment they consider necessary for you, even when you are not conscious enough to know. In which case, according to the nurse, you could well receive a flu shot for instance (as others have discovered) whilst you are under anesthetic. You must therefore add to the form and sign any wish you may have to not receive any particular treatment.

Listen to the nurse speaking at the link below from Exposing the Darkness at Substack:

They Will Inject You While You Are Unconscious

Related:

10 Things You MUST KNOW Before Your Next Hospital Visit (and other related info)

Image by Catkin from Pixabay

Weather warfare

Weird Ship Seen off Spanish Coast During the Recent Devastating Flooding

Leave a comment

From Max Igan

Max speaks extensively on all global events, joining dots regarding the UN, WEF global agendas. If pressed for time, to hear info on the weird ship seen off the coast of Spain, go to 11 mins. He speaks about the anomalies around the unprecedented flooding recently experienced there.

Known as disaster capitalism, worldwide disasters, including earthquakes, are frequently surrounded with such events.
They do all tend to follow a familiar pattern. (I’m adding some links below, including NZ’s). And the weird ship … one was also seen off NZ’s coast (the Anadarko) at the time of the Christchurch earthquake in 2011. 

READ AT THE LINK

https://truthwatchnz.is/all-categories/weather-warfare/weird-ship-seen-off-spanish-coast-during-the-devastating-flooding

Smart Meters

The Real Purpose of Smart Meters

Leave a comment

From SAVE US NOW @ Substack

ITS NOT SMART ITS NOT CLEVER AND YOU NEED TO GET IT REMOVED BEFORE THEY PULL THE TRIGGER

Mark Steele, weapons expert, speaks on smart meters.

READ/LISTEN at the link

For more info on smart meters go here

 

Vaccines

Vaccine Stocks Rattle after Trump’s Election

2 Comments
Vaccine Stocks Rattle after Trump’s Election
News

The Anniversary of the NZ Govt-led invasion of peaceful Parihaka in 1881

Leave a comment
The anniversary of the NZ Govt-led invasion of peaceful Parihaka in 1881
Global Governance, New World Order, News

The UN is hoping a pact adopted in less than two weeks will establish One World Government rule; Here’s what you can do

4 Comments

From The Exposé

Through pacts the United Nations is hoping will be adopted in less than two weeks at the ‘Summit of the Future’, the UN is establishing a One World Government through the monopoly of national sovereignty.

However, there is no lawful authorisation for delegates to vote on the ‘Pact for the Future’, ‘Declaration for Future Generations’, ‘Global Digital Compact’ and António Guterres’ ‘Our Common Agenda’.

Serve this notice and declaration on the United Nations, your government representative to the United Nations and your government. Demand that your voice is heard before the exclusive Summit of The Future takes place from 20 to 23 September 2024.

The Summit of the Future is a high-level United Nations (“UN”) event scheduled for 22 and 23 September 2024, with “action days” being held on 20 and 21 September. The Summit will culminate in the adoption of the ‘Pact for the Future’.

Leaders from UN Member States will attend the Summit to reaffirm existing commitments, including the Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) and the UN Charter, and move towards a “reinvigorated multilateral” system.

It is expected that other participants of the Summit will include representatives from various UN agencies, selected non-governmental organisations, selected private sector businesses and industries, selected representatives from universities and research institutions, selected municipalities, regional governments and local authorities, and the dystopian and nefarious sounding “representatives of future generations.”

There are two chapters in the draft Pact of the Future: a chapter on science, technology, innovation and digital cooperation, and a chapter on youth and future generations. The draft chapter on youth and future generations builds on the 1997 ‘UNESCO Declaration on Responsibilities towards Future Generations’ and takes the perspective on future generations further. 

Read more: An Overview of the Pact for the Future, UNESCO, 2 February 2024

Future generations are defined by the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ – the UN also refers to this document as ‘Declaration for Future Generations’ which is annexed to the Pact for the Future – as “all those generations that do not yet exist, and who will inherit this planet.” 

By definition, the future generations will always “not yet exist,” ad infinitum.  In 100 years, the future generations at that time will not yet exist.  In 1,000 years, the same; future generations will not yet exist.  The “future generations” concept is simply a poor excuse for a selected few – “representatives of future generations” – to make rules that they expect billions of people who do exist to obey, ad infinitum.

Further reading: UN Pact for the Future: All our lives will be dictated to by a selected UN envoy to represent generations not yet born

Who are the “representatives of future generations,” how many of them are there and who selects them? As is usual for the UN and its agencies, the document that member states are expected to adopt is sparse of such important details; perhaps it is because they don’t want member states to know who the few that are selected, or self-selected, to rule the world are.

The only details we’re given who the selected few rulers are is in The Declaration on Future Generations.  It merely states that member states agree to the UN Secretary-General’s proposal of the appointment of a “UN Special Envoy for Future Generations,” which we assume may play a crucial role once they have been appointed. But as far as negotiations and representation for future generations at the Summit are concerned, the World Future Council (“WFC”) plays a leading role, or so they claim:

The World Future Council is well placed to play a leading role in the Summit of the Future, having focussed on the rights of futures [sic] generations as its main task since its launch 15 years ago.

The WFC has long pleaded for Representatives/ Guardians of Future Generations to be installed at international, national and local levels, with authority to scrutinise and propose policies to uphold their interests, including the right to peace, intergenerational justice, and a healthy, sustainable environment.

From the very beginning the World Future Council is mainly involved in the preparations of the Summit and its preparatory process.UN Summit of the Future – towards a global Pact for the Future, World Futures Council

It’s almost irrelevant who and how many are involved in the small clique dictating what people who do exist should do for people who do “not yet exist.”  The concept of “future generations” dictating our lives alone, as with the entire Pact for the Future, is enough to outright reject it before it even gets to the stage of the UN appointing a “Special Envoy for Future Generations.”

To this end, Shabnam Palesa Mohamed has prepared a notice for anyone from any country to serve on their country’s UN representative ahead of the Summit.  She has also included a list of permanent country representatives and observers to the United Nations so citizens can easily find who the notice should be served on.  AS Mohamed recommends, don’t forget to copy in your Member of Parliament or government representative.  And since some local municipality and government representatives may be attending the Summit, or so it is claimed, perhaps copy them in too.

UN_Notice_And_Declaration_2024_UpdatedDownload

HeadsofUNmissionsDownload

Break The Silence: UN Notice and Declaration on Public Participation

The following is summarised and paraphrased from the notice for serving on the UN representative and/or observers from your country.  You can read and download the full notice either in the file attached above or on Mohamed’s Substack page HERE.

Mohamed’s document contains three notices in one:

  • Notice of Urgent Declaration of Invalidity on the Summit of the Future, Pact for the Future, And Annexes due to lack of public knowledge, participation, and informed consent
  • Notice of Urgent Statement of Dispute on the standing authority the United Nations is unlawfully appropriating to manage real or engineered emergencies, outlined in its ‘Common Agenda’
  • Notice of Urgent Objection to a United Nations Declaration, a political declaration on pandemics, announced at the UNGA 78, which ignored the 11+ countries that broke the silence, in writing

She has organised the document into five sections:

  • Rule of Law + International Law
  • Summary and Call to Action
  • Public Participation
  • Dispute Resolution (This section includes the three notices mentioned above: the ‘Declaration of Invalidity’, the ‘Statement of Dispute’ and the ‘Objection to political declaration on pandemics’)
  • Conclusion with Appeal

The UN system is intended to operate on the principle of the Rule of Law, as outlined in the UN’s own official documentation.  The intention of this principle is to ensure transparency, accountability and respect for human rights in all UN activities and decision-making processes. Yet, during the covid event, the UN was fully aware of human rights abuses around the world. This includes draconian lockdowns, state violence, poverty and destructive social crisis.

Additionally, before any government can declare a state of emergency, it must show that the alleged public health crisis “threatens the life of the nation” according to specific criteria. These criteria were not met for covid; international law was knowingly violated.

Deepening the distrust in the UN is its inaction and silence against those who intimidated delegates at the 77th World Health Assembly into agreeing with amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005.

Due to a lack of comprehensive public participation relating to the UN Secretary-General’s ‘Our Common Agenda’ document and the ‘Pact for the Future’ – with its annexes the ‘Global Digital Compact’ and the ‘Declaration on Future Generations’ – We The People insist that the following are included in the discussions of and report on the Summit of the Future: 

  • our Declaration of Invalidity,
  • our Statement of Dispute, and
  • our Urgent Objection

We demand that both the Pact for the Future and Our Common Agenda be withdrawn at the upcoming Summit for the Future. Should this not happen, member state delegates, who answer to the people of the countries they represent, must reject these documents outright. They must not be intimidated for doing so, as was the case at the WHO’s World Health Assembly in May this year about International Health Regulations 2005.

Explainer: The UN operates a “silence procedure.”  This is when a proposal or text is circulated among participants, often with a deadline for comments or amendments. If no objections are raised before the deadline, the text is considered adopted by all participants. If a participant still has fundamental issues with the text, they can “break the silence” by raising an objection before the deadline. This allows for further negotiations or revisions.

The notice prepared by Mohamed notes that the silence procedure on the Declaration on Future Generations has been broken.  However, the UN has withheld which countries voiced objections to this Declaration. “Civil society has a right to know which countries have objected,” Mohamed’s notice states.

The United Nations faces legitimate criticism for consistently falling far short of legitimate expectations and demands that the UN documents and its staff have proclaimed. This includes ongoing secretive negotiations on the Pact for the Future and Our Common Agenda. There has been little to no meaningful public participation at the UN and member state level. There is therefore growing international resistance.

The UN also faces criticism for, inter alia, top-down approaches and political and economic influences.

In 2020, UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, issued a vision for human rights, titled ‘The Highest Aspiration: A Call to Action for Human Rights’. In it, “The ‘three P’s’: participation, protection and promotion” were highlighted. These undertakings have not been achieved by the UN. The UN has failed to uphold its commitments in general, and in particular, in relation to the Pact for the Future, the Declaration on Future Generations, the Global Digital Compact and Our Common Agenda.

The UN is fully aware that it is only a select group of civil society organisations that interact with the UN or that have a seat at the table. Even these organisations continue to complain about the lack of inclusion, transparency and respect afforded to them by the UN and its agencies, including the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) and the IMF.

Civil society non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”) have expressed discontent with the UN’s transparency and lack of inclusion, particularly in the accreditation process for NGOs seeking consultative status with the UN. Key issues include bias in the ECOSOC Committee, lack of transparency in decision-making, restrictive criteria and limited representation.

In September 2023 a letter was sent by 11 member state delegates UN GA president Dennis Francis and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. The member states were objecting to unilateral coercive measures and violations of human rights and international law relating to the adoption of a high level political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. 

The political declaration was being adopted using the “silence procedure.” Both WHO Director-General Adhanom Tedros Ghebreyesus and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres ignored this letter from the 11 member states and declared that all 193 member states of the United Nations had approved the political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

Through the Pact for the Future, Our Common Agenda and Emergency Platform, the UN is establishing a One World Government through the monopoly of national sovereignty.

There is no lawful authorisation to vote on the Pact for the Future, Declaration for Future Generations, Global Digital Compact, and Our Common Agenda.

Featured image:  Planning ahead: Five things to know about the UN’s landmark Summit of the Future, United Nations. This is an image taken from the UN’s webpage for the Summit of the Future. Notice the snakes, three heads, wrapping around the world!

Agenda 2030, News

New developments from the kindly UN

9 Comments

Like your (pretend) govt the kindly UN really loves you. They promise you will own nothing & be happy. Their plans are always there in plain sight if you care to search out and read them. See the latest planned for 2025.

Excerpt: Failure to comply or resist will be met by violent and brutal force, and those not in compliance should expect to be shot on sight

Read at the link

Covid-19 experimental injection

NZ Whistleblower Barry Young provides data on the young New Zealanders who have died post-CV Vax

5 Comments

From freenz.substack.com

Whistleblower Barry Young provides his data on the young New Zealanders, aged 40 and under, who died between the nationwide rollout of the covid vaccination in 2021, and who were registered as having had at least one dose of Covid vaccination before November 2023. (Short Clip … Be sure to scroll down to the full video and do read the comments).

SOURCE

To the parents of the little ones listed there who were cut off from the tender age of 5 years old … my deep condolences. I can’t begin to imagine your grief.

Note to Ken at comments: if you genuinely wish to communicate with me please use the contact form.

RELATED:

They want to kill you – Here’s how they’ll do it – Dr Vernon Coleman

They Are Censoring & Silencing Us – (Liz Gunn important followup)

Treaty of Waitangi

Remembering why empires make treaties

1 Comment
Remembering why empires make treaties
agenda 21/30, Medical Industry

The persecution of long time whistle blower Dr Vernon Coleman: the dirty tricks used to make life miserable & difficult for him & his wife

2 Comments
This Is The End
agenda 21/30, Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Midwives are being persecuted in NZ

2 Comments

Richard Vobes
Whistleblower, Irene Chain joins me to explain how the important role of the midwife is being manipulated in New Zealand, as well as the rest of the world.

RELATED

Cervix with a smile, unjabbed midwife Irene Kalinowski, Author of “My Body my baby” Vinny Eastwood

Geoengineering

NASAs 1985 Document: Lithium & Barium Releases into the Atmosphere

2 Comments

Note the full article is worth the very low priced sub … as recommended previously. You still get to read more than a small part of this article. Those trails are not conspiracy & there it all is in their own documentation. See also this page for evidence of these metals in NZ rainwater ….EWNZ

From Agent131711’s Substack

The United States, Germany and United Kingdom teamed up to spam the sky with chemicals to make fake comets and artificial auroras. Oh, and they also wanted to see if it BLOCKS THE SUN…

Although they tell us, “Chemtrails aren’t real”, and, “the government isn’t intentionally releasing anything into the sky”, almost 40 years ago, NASA published a document called Astronautics and Aeronautics for 1985, which outlined the creation of their program that intentionally released chemicals into the sky… the exact same chemicals that are still coming down in our rain water and snow… because they are still being intentionally released… by the government… into the sky. Duh.

I just finished writing a 4-part series about NASA. In this series we asked, How Fake is NASA?, then looked at almost 60 YEARS of Space propaganda leading up to the first space venture in history. In the second part of the series we looked at The NASA PSYOP and tried to locate 1 real photograph of outer space. Part 3 was called How to Fake Space, and showed NASA’s CGI glitches, harnesses, green screens and more. In the grand finale to the series we examined Who is NASA and Why would they Lie? All of this evidence, combined together, leads us to ask, “If they’re not going to Space, WTF is $25+ billion (in tax dollars) PER YEAR BEING SPENT ON?”. Perhaps we can answer that today.

READ AT THE LINK

https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/chemtrails-nasas-1985-document-lithium?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1865725&post_id=138171694&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email

Photo: Agent131711’s Substack

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Health New Zealand is at it again! Scrubbing the evidence?

Leave a comment

From Steve Kirsch @ Substack

Health New Zealand is at it again! They are trying to get my site taken down. Not going to happen

Here are the emails I sent to the Australian attorneys hired by HNZ and the NZ ERA . Bottom line: Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea. Never. I will not comply.

Maybe they should change their tagline to “Hiding public health records from the public since 2022.”

Executive summary

Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea, especially when you are killing the public with a vaccine you are pushing.

Health New Zealand can’t explain how their data is consistent with a safe vaccine (it isn’t).

So they are trying to con my hosting provider into taking down my site. Shame on them! Censoring truth is never a good plan and those participating in such an effort should be ashamed of themselves.

Why can’t we have a public discussion on what the data says instead of trying to censor the truth?

Here are two emails I just sent out. Enjoy.

My email to Clyde & Co, the Australia law firm sending emails to my hosting provider to have my site deleted

From: Steve Kirsch
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:13 PM
To: Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa
Subject: URGENT – Deletion request
Importance: High

Hi Anthony,

What a pleasure to meet you!

If you want me to remove PHI, I would be happy to do so.

Why didn’t you just ask me nicely? Doing an end-run directly to my hosting provider doesn’t sound like you are dealing in good faith.

I’m sure you want to save lives just like I do, but pulling a stunt like this is NOT HELPFUL to building a great relationship with me.

As you know, you have no jurisdiction over me or my hosting provider. So pissing me off is simply NOT a good idea. It doesn’t serve your client well to do that.

You’ll have as much luck COMPELLING me to remove the data as the DOJ had with the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers. You should study that decision. It didn’t end well for the DOJ. Here’s a link.

I’ve told Margie Apa that I’d be happy to remove any MRN which discloses PHI.

I also shared my offer to her publicly.

She ignored my request. I don’t get it.

If you want to mitigate damages, ignoring my request is stupid.

I suggest you tell them to IMMEDIATELY supply a list of offending MRNs and the NHI number which matches. Will you do that for me?

As far as I know, all the records I published are fully obfuscated so that it is impossible, even for me, to discover the PHI of any person or match the MRN with an NHI.

The records I published do not match the records of any person living or dead. Not a single one. Am I mistaken?

If Health New Zealand disagrees, kindly provide the MRN and the matching NHI identifier.

If you cannot do this, then what’s the issue?

I don’t want to harm anyone, and I’m happy to VOLUNTARILY redact any offending records, but you have provided NO EVIDENCE OF HARM.

I request that you IMMEDIATELY provide a list of offending MRNs and the associated NHI so that damages can be mitigated.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.  I’m in California and you can call up to 10pm PST.

Finally, 2 months ago, I published an article “An offer you can’t refuse.”

Health New Zealand took NO ACTION on my request.

If they publish the FULL data, I’m happy to remove my data as it will no longer be needed. Why did they ignore that? That’s another way to solve the problem.

I look forward to hearing from you.

-steve

P. S. Barry Young is a hero. These records prove that Health New Zealand has been KILLING people with these vaccines. Maybe you should ask them to look at the data that was leaked? I requested a meeting with their epidemiologists to explain to me why, if the vaccine is safe, the mortality curves between vaxxed and background diverge. THEY REFUSED TO DO THAT. Why would they do that unless they are HIDING SOMETHING: like the fact that the vaccines are the cause of the excess deaths of THOUSANDS of people in New Zealand. Why can’t we talk about it? I’d be happy to invite YALE PROFESSOR HARVEY RISCH to the meeting; he is one of the TOP EPIDEMIOLOGISTS in the world. WHY CAN’T WE TALK ABOUT IT?

My email to the New Zealand Employment Relations Authority

To: christchurchera@era.govt.nz
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa; Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Subject: [2023] NZERA 718 3266200 Health New Zealand will not comply with my request to mitigate damages. They should be ordered to supply offending MRNs
Importance: High

Barry Young disclosed the information to me. I am a US journalist and published the obfuscated records on the Internet.

I told the chief executive of Health New Zealand I’d be happy to VOLUNTARILY remove any record which “would likely have significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their whanau.”

They have refused to comply with my request.

I request the ERA order them to supply me with the offending records (using the MRN record identifier) and explain how it is possible for the record to be matched to any person, dead or alive, in a way that harms that person.

All the records were obfuscated using a ONE WAY randomization algorithm so that the data for a given person cannot be identified. Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for any person to identify someone else’s record.

So a breach of PHI is IMPOSSIBLE. No one has contacted me to remove their record because nobody can find their record because it is unfindable.

They need to provide proof to the ERA that there is at least one of the 4M records published on my S3 site that could reveal PHI or could have SIGNIFICANT or IRREPARABLE consequences.

Where is that proof?

They CANNOT meet that burden.

I said I would remove any such record from my website voluntarily.

They REFUSED to identify the MRN(s) of any such records!!!

They should be ordered by the ERA to identify the MRNs of these records IMMEDIATELY to mitigate damages.

If they fail to do that, they should be held accountable for any such harm that their inaction has caused.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.

They refuse to engage in dialog to settle this matter.

I have NO desire to harm people, but they refuse to provide any evidence of harm.

Where is the list of MRNs to be removed and the description of the irreparable harm for each of the records requested?

They will not provide this voluntarily. THEY SHOULD BE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THIS LIST IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ANY DAMAGES CAN BE MITIGATED.

Steve Kirsch
US journalist

Summary

Health New Zealand is trying to enforce an order which was obtained under false pretenses claiming that there are “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families” through the publication of the obfuscated records.

This is blatantly false.

They cannot identify a single record in the data that I publicly released that can cause “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families.” Not a single one.

When I asked them to identify the MRN of any offending record so that I can voluntarily remove it, they refused to respond to my request.

What they want is to have the entire database taken down to cover their crime.

They’ve been killing people and they are unable to explain their own data.

Even top New Zealand experts can’t explain away the New Zealand data leaked by Barry Young. Epic fail every time. It’s ludicrous. For example, Janine Paynter got so pissed that I wasn’t falling for her bullshit handwaving arguments that she blocked me. Way to resolve conflict Janine! Maybe try data next time instead of nonsensical bullshit arguments?

Health New Zealand wants the public health data censored so the public won’t have the evidence to convict them of negligent homicide. It’s as simple as that.

Sorry, but I’m not going to be a party to the cover up of the crime scene.

Please share this post widely, especially if you live in New Zealand.

SOURCE

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/health-new-zealand-is-at-it-again

RELATED:

My generous offer sent to Health New Zealand today… you’re going to love it!

$25,000 reward for the first person to show that I’ve leaked any PHI

agenda 21/30, News

Another puppet working to rebuild trust in the World Economic Forum (WEF)?

2 Comments

I’d bet on the latter…

President Javier Milei – “Planting Ideas of Freedom” but is he just Rebuilding Trust For the WEF?

Photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mrecic-argentina/53396149399/

agenda 21/30, News

Why Has Bill Gates Spent $113 Million on Nebraska Farmland? (and why is he borrowing against it?)

7 Comments

EWNZ Comment: all that stands out for me about this man is the smirk we saw on his face when he said in the midst of ‘their’ plandemic that destroyed countless people’s lives … ‘wait until we see the next one [fake ‘virus’] … that, and 47K crippled children …. he is no philanthropist ..

“Gates doesn’t simply receive rent checks from his Nebraska farmland. He’s also using it to borrow staggering sums of money.”

From expose-news .com

In 2017, the Canadian board made the decision to sell a significant portion of its American farmland portfolio, which amounted to half a billion dollars and included all 22,830 acres of its land in Nebraska. The purchaser and financial details of these seemingly ordinary Nebraska farms remained undisclosed until recently, it has now been revealed that the individual behind this purchase is none other than Bill Gates and over the past six years, Gates has has invested more than $113 million in purchasing farmland in Nebraska.

Gates’ ownership of farmland is structured through over 20 shell companies located across the country. Some of these entities trace back to a P.O. Box in Kirkland, Washington, where Cascade Asset Management, responsible for managing all of Gates’ investments, is headquartered. Bill Gates’ Nebraska neighbors don’t know he owns the soybean field down the road. 

Here’s the story of his spending spree, including the massive loan he took out against his land by Destiny Herbers of Flatwater Press.

READ AT THE LINK

Why Has Bill Gates Spent $113 Million on Nebraska Farmland?

Image by Foto-RaBe from Pixabay

GMO, News

“Hello, I’d like to eat a genetically modified animal today”

2 Comments

Kiwis (in case you think we’re GE free) go here for up to date info on topic for NZ … that clean green paradise (not) in the Sth Pacific … (see also here, here, here and here) … EWNZ

From Jon Rappoport @ Substack

I found an interesting section in an FDA report, “GMO Crops, Animal Food, and Beyond.” The information is listed as current as of August 2022.

Are There GMO Animals in the Food Supply? Yes. FDA has approved an application allowing the sale of the AquAdvantage Salmon to consumers. The AquAdvantage Salmon has been genetically modified to reach an important growth point faster. FDA has also approved an alteration in the GalSafe pig for human food consumption and potential therapeutic uses. The GalSafe pig was developed to be free of detectable alpha-gal sugar on its cell surfaces. People with Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) may have allergic reactions to alpha-gal sugar found in red meat (e.g., beef, pork, and lamb). FDA has determined that food from the AquAdvantage Salmon and the GalSafe pig are as safe and nutritious to eat as food from non-GMO salmon and pigs.

Sounds wonderful. Shall we try a bit of each? I’ve ways wanted to eat salmon that was engineered to grow faster than usual.

Perhaps we should read a piece in the Alaska Beacon first. Title: “Pushback continues against genetically modified salmon being raised at Indiana farm.” October 10, 2023.

Engineered by biotech company AquaBounty Technologies Inc., the “AquAdvantage” salmon is the first such altered animal to be cleared for human consumption in the United States.

In 2018, the federal agency greenlit AquaBounty’s sprawling Indiana facility, which as of last December was raising roughly 492 metric tons of salmon from eggs imported from Canada but is capable of raising more than twice that amount. The company is currently making improvements to its Indiana production facility. Once completed, salmon harvests are expected to increase.

During the 2023 Farm Aid concert site, organizers from Block Corporate Salmon traveled an hour north to AquaBounty’s salmon growing facility where they sought to raise awareness about the “risks and harms” of genetically engineered fish.

“AquaBounty misrepresents its system to raise salmon in tanks that they claim will be recirculating water,” said Jaydee Hanson, Policy Director of Center for Food Safety. “In fact, their operations literally mine water, foul it with salmon feces, and dump it into the nearest river. They have a serious problem of illness in their chronically inflamed fish. They are not disclosing how many antibiotics they use. Consumers don’t need sick fish like these.”

Earlier, in 2022, Block Corporate Salmon also released “AquaBounty Exposed,” a report that outlined allegedly concerning conditions at AquaBounty’s Albany facility.

Former employee Braydon Humphrey, who spoke at last month’s news conference, shared more than 60 pages of photos and videos that he claims detail how AquaBounty “regularly violated food and worker safety standards, ignored animal welfare concerns, and caused environmental damage unbeknownst to the public and its investors.”

“I was deeply disturbed by what I witnessed during my time at AquaBounty,” said Humphrey, who worked as a tech at the Indiana facility from December 2018 to January 2020. “Among other atrocities, we saw high mortalities in densely packed fish tanks—including common instances of AquAdvantage salmon dying from ruptured stomachs, caused by their artificially fast growth rate.”

—Waiter? I’ll pass on the salmon. How about the rattlesnake fang sushi instead? I think it’ll be safer.

And now, on to the GalSafe GMO pigs. Approved for people with meat allergies. Sort of.

A publication called The Counter brings up rather disturbing facts.

FDA only evaluated [the pig producer] Revivicor’s claim that GalSafe pigs are, in fact, free of alpha-gal and safe to eat. But because Revivicor did not provide data or make claims related to food allergies, FDA didn’t “evaluate food safety specific to those with [alpha-gal syndrome].” In other words, GalSafe pigs aren’t expected to trigger reactions in people with red meat allergies, but FDA has not scrutinized any allergy-related guarantees. “People with an alpha-gal allergy that would like to consume meat from these pigs but have questions should talk to their doctor,” an agency spokesperson said in an emailed statement. This caveat is worrisome for some consumer interest advocates, who believe that FDA jumped the gun with its approval.

“It shouldn’t have been approved until they had adequately addressed the allergenicity of the product,” said Jaydee Hanson, policy director for the Center for Food Safety.

Eating the GMO pigs might be a problem for people with allergies. Or it might not.

Very good. Glad we got that straight.

Another brilliant decision from the FDA.

When I eat GMO bacon or GMO salmon—I have a special microscope that allows me to make that determination—I drop the meat in a vat full of a propriety poison I manufacture in my garage. It removes any trace of GMO problems. So far, only one of my arms has fallen off from the poison.

It’s a trade-off.

Or Love your GMOs. Assume They’re good for you.

— Jon Rappoport

Episode 57 of Rappoport Podcasts—“Aaron Rodgers and the death of television! Rodgers, Jimmy Kimmel, Jeffrey Epstein, COVID, Fauci, ESPN, Disney, Taylor Swift, ‘Mr. Pfizer’—it’s one big ball of wax; Let’s melt it down and see what it looks like”—is now posted on my substack. It’s a blockbuster. To listen, go here. To learn more about this episode of Rappoport Podcasts, go here.

Subscribe to Jon Rappoport

Thousands of paid subscribers

The Hottest Takes on Culture

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/hello-i-would-like-to-eat-a-gmo-animal-today?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=806546&post_id=140923816&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email

Image by Dmitry Grushin from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection

Edward Dowd: “Something HORRIBLE Is Going On but No One Wants To Talk About It”

Leave a comment

From Lioness of Judah Ministry @ Substack

“We have a national security crisis: The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population.”

This is all you need to know about the “unexplained” surge in sudden deaths:

“If the sudden deaths we’re seeing were occurring in the unvaccinated, this would be on every news channel 24/7. But it’s not.”

“The employed of our country are dropping dead and getting disabled at a rate that is beyond the general population. I blame the vaccines. If it’s not that, then what is it?

And why aren’t we talking about it?”

SHORT VIDEO AT THE LINK (from Vigilant Fox @ Substack)

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/edward-dowd-something-horrible-is?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

RELATED (Steve Kirsch)
The UK ONS isn’t ignoring me anymore, thanks to help from an influential MP Andrew Bridgen

Image by Alex Peroff from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection

The NZ data leaked by whistleblower Barry Young is unassailable proof the CV vaccines increase your risk of death

Leave a comment

From Steve Kirsch @ Substack

They will do everything to gaslight you into believing otherwise. The one thing they won’t do is have a civil debate with me on the time-series analysis or explain to anyone how it is wrong.

Executive summary

No country has ever disclosed patient record-level data on any vaccine ever before in history.

The reason for this is not due to privacy concerns. I proved that after I released the NZ data publicly and not a single person could find their records.

The reason that governments don’t release the public health data is that it would reveal that they have been systematically killing their citizens with these “vaccines.”

Finally, one brave guy, Barry Young, an Oracle DBA at Health New Zealand, leaks the data to me. I obfuscated it to preserve privacy, and then made it publicly available for everyone to see.

Health New Zealand chief executive Margie Apa blows a fuse and has my Wasabi site taken down (so I instantly put up again at a bulletproof hosting firm) and has her chief people officer, Andrew Slater, write a note to me informing me of the orders they obtained in New Zealand. Slater conveniently fails to mention he has no jurisdiction over me. This is a scare tactic to silence me. When I ask Slater if I can talk to the epidemiologists, he ghosts me. Nice guy.

None of the leadership team at Health New Zealand is interested in the fact that their database shows they are killing New Zealanders with these vaccines. They will not let me speak to any of their epidemiologists and they won’t show me the time series analysis done by their epidemiologists for some reason. Why not? That’s the best way to silence me: just show me how I got it wrong.

Two New Zealand scientists at the University of Auckland, Janine Paynter and Helen Petousis-Harris, have viewed the leaked data, but refuse to publish their report. Nor will they explain how my analysis is wrong. They do not want to engage in any scientific discussion at all. I can’t even pay them to tell me how I got it wrong. I even offered them $250,000 to talk to me. No response. This is because the data leaked by Barry Young is a third-rail for them.

Barry Young is being charged with a crime. But the reality is that HNZ has given us a gift.

When Barry has his day in court, he gets to do something none of us have been able to do: force these people to answer the questions we’ve always wanted to know the answer to but they always refused to answer.

These are questions such as:

  1. What reports did the epidemiologists create based on the NZ data showing the vaccine reduces all-cause mortality in New Zealand?
  2. What investigations were made by Health New Zealand after Barry Young informed management there was a safety problem with the COVID vaccine?
  3. How did the New Zealand epidemiologists at Health New Zealand explain the time-series analysis of the leaked data? The time-series analysis shows the vaccines increased the risk of death. If the vaccine didn’t cause this, then why were recently vaccinated people dying at a progressively higher rate than the rest of New Zealand (those of the same age). What did all these people have in common that accelerated their death if it wasn’t the vaccine?

I can’t wait.

In the meantime, here’s a very brief summary of the New Zealand data for people to chew on.

I’d be delighted to debate any of this with a qualified epidemiologist who disagrees with me, but so far no takers.

What does that tell you?

Gaslighting attempts

Lots of people will try to gaslight you into thinking the NZ data is a nothing burger.

They are wrong.

Unfortunately, none of them will go “on camera” to allow me to challenge them about their claims of missing data, no control group, under-reported deaths, it’s HVE, etc.

I have an open offer to any of them. The only rules I have are: no insults and each side gets the same amount of talk time.

Apparently, that’s too challenging for them to agree to.

Darn. Darn. Darn.

I am lonelier than the Maytag repairman.

The Lonely Brand Story Meets Social Media by @TheGrok

Quick summary of what the New Zealand data shows

The time-series cohort analysis I did on the New Zealand data is definitive.

Here’s just one example of what it shows.

This is for doses 2 through 4. Doses 2 and 4 are given when the death rate is going down. Dose 3 is given when the seasonal death rate is increasing. There are 1.7 times as many person days in the 2,4 cohort vs. the dose 3 cohort. So the slope should be going down. It doesn’t. It goes up. This is the smoking gun. Nobody can explain it. This happens in other countries as well (see this post which references S3.B in this paper as well as this article).

Mortality rate in deaths per 100K person years vs. week number since vaccine administered (x-axis). This is for doses 2 through 4. It’s “supposed” to slope down due to seasonality. The slope goes the wrong way if the vax is safe. Nobody can explain this. This is not due to the “healthy vaccinee effect” (HVE) which lasts only 4 weeks.

You can also look at Dose 4 alone. I picked everyone who got the shot in July 2022 so I could track this vs. the background deaths in NZ. The death rate goes up if you got the shot while the rest of New Zealand’s death rate is falling.

As you can see, the elderly, for which the death rate should be dramatically falling, experiences the opposite effect if they’ve been jabbed:

Pivot table analysis of people who got Dose 4 in July 2022. Their deaths per month increase when they should be decreasing.

We don’t need to get any more complicated than these two examples.

They are simply unexplainable if the vaccines are safe.

Summary

Barry Young is a hero.

Not only did he publicly expose the data that definitively shows the COVID vaccines are killing people, but he also gets to compel these epidemiologists to finally explain how I got it wrong.

I can’t wait. I’ve been pleading for qualified scientists to set me on the right path for years now with no success. They all refuse to explain the observations above (or give me bogus answers like “it’s HVE”).

It’s a shame that Barry had to be arrested for us to get answers, but it’s clear that a court hearing is simply the only way to compel qualified scientists to answer questions nowadays.

And a big thank you to Health New Zealand for having Barry arrested which will give Barry this opportunity to expose the real criminals in his court hearing. It will be epic. I can’t wait.

SOURCE

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-new-zealand-data-leaked-by-whistleblower?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=548354&post_id=140898645&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email
agenda 21/30, News, War

Tomorrow—January 22, 2024— NATO to hold biggest drills since Cold War with 90,000 troops

Leave a comment

From Mark Crispin Miller

The US under “Joe Biden” is a rogue state doing all it can for world depopulation, through incessant WAR all over

From Russell “Texas” Bentley in Donetsk:

I wrote the following article a few days ago. It was published in a somewhat watered down form by Sputnik International News. (MSM is the same everywhere, it only varies by degrees.) This is the original. Feel free to publish or share. The news it contains IS important. There is also a link to a second article with very important news below my article.

Reuters reports that NATO “exercise” Steadfast Defender 2024, will begin on Monday, January 22nd, and will run “through” May, which means until June. The deployment will include 90,000 troops, 50 ships, including aircraft carriers, more than 80 combat aircraft, including fighter jets, and over 1,100 combat vehicles, including at least 133 tanks and over 500 infantry fighting vehicles. The fact that the “exercise’ begins next week, and the Western MSM is only now publicizing it, means that all the military assets are already in position. They’re not “coming”, they’re here.

NATO to hold biggest drills since Cold War with 90,000 troops

January 18, 2024

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nato-kick-off-biggest-drills-decades-with-some-90000-troops-2024-01-18/


This is the biggest NATO combined arms “exercise” since REFORGER 1988, back when the USSR and Warsaw pact were still in existence. In other words, this is the biggest NATO troop movement since the end of the Cold War, almost doubling the previous largest, which was 50,000 troops involved in Trident Juncture in 2018. 90,000 troops on the move for almost half a year, concentrating in the Baltic states on Russia’s borders, in Romania, on the Ukraine border, and in Germany, the military logistics hub of NATO, and where it all started “last time”. You know what I mean.

Politics and war can best be exemplified by the game of chess. In chess, there are three specific stages – the opening, the middle game, and the end game. The opening is when the two opponents move their pawns into a defensive line and develop the major pieces for maneuver. It is relatively bloodless, and if done correctly, more strategic than tactical. There is no defining moment when the game transitions from the opening game to the middle game, but the middle game is where the fighting really begins, and you know it when you get there.

The middle game is where the majority of pieces are lost, the fighting is most intense, and surprise moves are most likely. The game can often end in checkmate during this phase, with one side being totally defeated by a surprise move they did not see coming. Remember that.

If there is no surprise defeat, the middle game is usually short, and when it is over, the chessboard is vastly different than when it began. In the end game, the majority of pieces on both sides have been eliminated, only a few pieces remain – the kings, of course, and a few pieces close to them, defending them. From here, the game ends in checkmate, a definitive defeat of one side or the other, or a stalemate, where both sides agree that neither can win, thus ending the game, and agreeing to start over at some time in the future.

(Russell Bentley in the opening game, on frontline position “Blesna”, 2015)

With Steadfast Defender, Europe (and probably the world) enter the middle game. Fasten your seatbelts, we are in for a rough ride. This middle game will almost certainly not be confined to Europe. and before it is over, will most probably include surprise moves in the form of the use of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. No place on Earth will be safe, except, perhaps, for the luxury bunkers of the world’s billionaire elite. Maybe not even there…

The “Great Reset” has been interpreted by some as code for a depopulation plan to cull the human herd of the majority of its members. This idea has been dismissed by popular culture as just another “conspiracy theory”, but in reality, it remains the most plausible explanation for the many developments of the last few years. For instance –

The proof that the covid virus, and the “vaccine” it engendered, are actually biological weapons grows stronger every day. The genocide in Gaza, and Israel’s absolute disregard for international law and total lack of any meaningful response to it by the UN or international “community”, the intentional destruction of the US and European economies, spending, borrowing and looting national treasuries as if there were no tomorrow, the ecological destruction fomented by the very ones who pass draconian laws they claim are in order to protect it, the disinformation and gaslighting aimed at destroying people’s very ability to discern truth, and therefore, reality …

All of these developments that have intensified and accelerated in the last few years, when taken as a whole, can only be rationally and realistically explained thusly – “They (the global Parasite Class) are not stupid, they are doing it on purpose.” If there really is a plan by world elites to depopulate the planet, (There is, because) everything they have done would be exactly the way they would do it. Think about it. Prepare. And don’t forget to say your prayers. The middle game, just like Steadfast Defender, is already upon us. The end game begins soon, but it may well end in a stalemate like this…

======================================================