Tag Archives: nz_moh

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Health New Zealand is at it again! Scrubbing the evidence?

Leave a comment

From Steve Kirsch @ Substack

Health New Zealand is at it again! They are trying to get my site taken down. Not going to happen

Here are the emails I sent to the Australian attorneys hired by HNZ and the NZ ERA . Bottom line: Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea. Never. I will not comply.

Maybe they should change their tagline to “Hiding public health records from the public since 2022.”

Executive summary

Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea, especially when you are killing the public with a vaccine you are pushing.

Health New Zealand can’t explain how their data is consistent with a safe vaccine (it isn’t).

So they are trying to con my hosting provider into taking down my site. Shame on them! Censoring truth is never a good plan and those participating in such an effort should be ashamed of themselves.

Why can’t we have a public discussion on what the data says instead of trying to censor the truth?

Here are two emails I just sent out. Enjoy.

My email to Clyde & Co, the Australia law firm sending emails to my hosting provider to have my site deleted

From: Steve Kirsch
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:13 PM
To: Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa
Subject: URGENT – Deletion request
Importance: High

Hi Anthony,

What a pleasure to meet you!

If you want me to remove PHI, I would be happy to do so.

Why didn’t you just ask me nicely? Doing an end-run directly to my hosting provider doesn’t sound like you are dealing in good faith.

I’m sure you want to save lives just like I do, but pulling a stunt like this is NOT HELPFUL to building a great relationship with me.

As you know, you have no jurisdiction over me or my hosting provider. So pissing me off is simply NOT a good idea. It doesn’t serve your client well to do that.

You’ll have as much luck COMPELLING me to remove the data as the DOJ had with the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers. You should study that decision. It didn’t end well for the DOJ. Here’s a link.

I’ve told Margie Apa that I’d be happy to remove any MRN which discloses PHI.

I also shared my offer to her publicly.

She ignored my request. I don’t get it.

If you want to mitigate damages, ignoring my request is stupid.

I suggest you tell them to IMMEDIATELY supply a list of offending MRNs and the NHI number which matches. Will you do that for me?

As far as I know, all the records I published are fully obfuscated so that it is impossible, even for me, to discover the PHI of any person or match the MRN with an NHI.

The records I published do not match the records of any person living or dead. Not a single one. Am I mistaken?

If Health New Zealand disagrees, kindly provide the MRN and the matching NHI identifier.

If you cannot do this, then what’s the issue?

I don’t want to harm anyone, and I’m happy to VOLUNTARILY redact any offending records, but you have provided NO EVIDENCE OF HARM.

I request that you IMMEDIATELY provide a list of offending MRNs and the associated NHI so that damages can be mitigated.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.  I’m in California and you can call up to 10pm PST.

Finally, 2 months ago, I published an article “An offer you can’t refuse.”

Health New Zealand took NO ACTION on my request.

If they publish the FULL data, I’m happy to remove my data as it will no longer be needed. Why did they ignore that? That’s another way to solve the problem.

I look forward to hearing from you.

-steve

P. S. Barry Young is a hero. These records prove that Health New Zealand has been KILLING people with these vaccines. Maybe you should ask them to look at the data that was leaked? I requested a meeting with their epidemiologists to explain to me why, if the vaccine is safe, the mortality curves between vaxxed and background diverge. THEY REFUSED TO DO THAT. Why would they do that unless they are HIDING SOMETHING: like the fact that the vaccines are the cause of the excess deaths of THOUSANDS of people in New Zealand. Why can’t we talk about it? I’d be happy to invite YALE PROFESSOR HARVEY RISCH to the meeting; he is one of the TOP EPIDEMIOLOGISTS in the world. WHY CAN’T WE TALK ABOUT IT?

My email to the New Zealand Employment Relations Authority

To: christchurchera@era.govt.nz
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa; Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Subject: [2023] NZERA 718 3266200 Health New Zealand will not comply with my request to mitigate damages. They should be ordered to supply offending MRNs
Importance: High

Barry Young disclosed the information to me. I am a US journalist and published the obfuscated records on the Internet.

I told the chief executive of Health New Zealand I’d be happy to VOLUNTARILY remove any record which “would likely have significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their whanau.”

They have refused to comply with my request.

I request the ERA order them to supply me with the offending records (using the MRN record identifier) and explain how it is possible for the record to be matched to any person, dead or alive, in a way that harms that person.

All the records were obfuscated using a ONE WAY randomization algorithm so that the data for a given person cannot be identified. Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for any person to identify someone else’s record.

So a breach of PHI is IMPOSSIBLE. No one has contacted me to remove their record because nobody can find their record because it is unfindable.

They need to provide proof to the ERA that there is at least one of the 4M records published on my S3 site that could reveal PHI or could have SIGNIFICANT or IRREPARABLE consequences.

Where is that proof?

They CANNOT meet that burden.

I said I would remove any such record from my website voluntarily.

They REFUSED to identify the MRN(s) of any such records!!!

They should be ordered by the ERA to identify the MRNs of these records IMMEDIATELY to mitigate damages.

If they fail to do that, they should be held accountable for any such harm that their inaction has caused.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.

They refuse to engage in dialog to settle this matter.

I have NO desire to harm people, but they refuse to provide any evidence of harm.

Where is the list of MRNs to be removed and the description of the irreparable harm for each of the records requested?

They will not provide this voluntarily. THEY SHOULD BE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THIS LIST IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ANY DAMAGES CAN BE MITIGATED.

Steve Kirsch
US journalist

Summary

Health New Zealand is trying to enforce an order which was obtained under false pretenses claiming that there are “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families” through the publication of the obfuscated records.

This is blatantly false.

They cannot identify a single record in the data that I publicly released that can cause “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families.” Not a single one.

When I asked them to identify the MRN of any offending record so that I can voluntarily remove it, they refused to respond to my request.

What they want is to have the entire database taken down to cover their crime.

They’ve been killing people and they are unable to explain their own data.

Even top New Zealand experts can’t explain away the New Zealand data leaked by Barry Young. Epic fail every time. It’s ludicrous. For example, Janine Paynter got so pissed that I wasn’t falling for her bullshit handwaving arguments that she blocked me. Way to resolve conflict Janine! Maybe try data next time instead of nonsensical bullshit arguments?

Health New Zealand wants the public health data censored so the public won’t have the evidence to convict them of negligent homicide. It’s as simple as that.

Sorry, but I’m not going to be a party to the cover up of the crime scene.

Please share this post widely, especially if you live in New Zealand.

SOURCE

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/health-new-zealand-is-at-it-again

RELATED:

My generous offer sent to Health New Zealand today… you’re going to love it!

$25,000 reward for the first person to show that I’ve leaked any PHI

Covid-19 experimental injection

What the Whistleblower Data Tells Us About the New Zealand Ministry of Health (Hatchard Report)

Leave a comment

For a list of links on topic go HERE

This week an interview with a Ministry of Health employee under the pseudonym Winston Smith, who leaked data to former journalist and recent political candidate Liz Gunn, caused an international sensation. A data set of four million vaccination records was briefly available for download and scrutiny from vaccine critic Steve Kirsch’s site. Many of you have no doubt watched the hour long interview by Liz Gunn by now. Kirsch independently promised his readers that international statistics experts would be publishing analysis of the data shortly.

The following article is also available as a printable PDF and an audio version.

The Wasabi site hosting the data for download acted rapidly to cancel Steve Kirsch’s account, and YouTube took down the video within minutes (it is still up on Rumble). The Ministry of Health issued a statement, widely reported in the New Zealand press, labelling the leak as misinformation. They announced that they had sacked the whistleblower and called in the police.

Dr. Shane Reti, our newly appointed Minister of Health, issued a statement:“There are many conspiracy theorists out there who unfortunately disseminate harmful disinformation, however, as Minister and as a physician, the public can and should continue to have confidence in vaccines. I am reassured by experts confirming that there is no evidence supporting the allegations that have been made.”

So the government feels that we should all be reassured by unnamed experts who say there is nothing to see here without discussing any specific points in the data leak. If you have been reading our reports here and here, you will know that there is a great deal of evidence published in reputable journals, including from New Zealand, indicating vaccine harm. As a result, we have consistently called for the release of data comparing health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated, but access was consistently denied by the previous government.

It now appears the incoming government is also going to tell us to look the other way.

If health data shows that there is no harm from Covid vaccines why would the government deny access to the relevant data?

In fact, more than two years ago the government granted unfettered access to New Zealand Covid vaccine health data to vaccinologist Dr. Petousis-Harris Co-Director of the Global Vaccine Data Network. She promised to publish data on vaccine safety within months but has published no results since, and has publicly stated that she will not be getting another Covid vaccine. So what do you make of that?

Last week the relative of a friend phoned them with some bad news from Australia. They had been diagnosed with pericarditis. “Don’t worry,” they said “I have seen a specialist and I should be able to come through it OK”. The specialist told them it was “due to a prior Covid infection”, “but I haven’t had Covid, I’ve had the vaccine” responded the patient. “Ah”, said the doctor, “you must have had Covid, it can’t be due to the vaccine.”

You get the picture don’t you? Pericarditis is a recognised adverse effect of mRNA Covid vaccination but medical experts are telling patients it can’t happen. I wonder what our experts are telling Dr. Shane Reti? It is ‘show and tell’ time at medical kindergarten. Can Dr Reti show us the full data or is he going to continue with the absurd and dictatorial ‘one podium of truth’ lie of the last administration?

More on the data leak

The whistleblower was reportedly a computer systems programmer at the Ministry of Health who designed the computer payment system for vaccine providers. In the video he appeared visibly distressed by the rate of deaths among those who had received vaccinations. There were a number of charts displayed showing for example that some South Island vaccination sites had been disproportionately affected by deaths subsequent to vaccination. It was immediately clear from the names of the providers that these sites serviced the elderly, an obvious and unfortunate data bias which has garnered some criticisms.

Respected mathematician Igor Chudov, who regularly analyses vaccine data and raises serious concerns about vaccine safety, downloaded the whole leaked data set of four million records and has now published some concerns on Substack under the title: “I analyzed the “Leaked NZ Whistleblower Data” and Suggest to Be Wary of It. Bad Data and Inconsistent Story“, others have also raised concerns.

Clearly the collection of vaccination data by the Ministry of Health has been a little haphazard and contains inconsistencies. There have been indications of this in earlier data, but in general the records leaked stand as authentic if incomplete. Statistically speaking, the main problem is the lack of sufficient data to make exact assessments of safety. In other words, a comparison of health outcomes between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated will be necessary. Precisely the data the Ministry of Health has refused to release. Unfortunately, the whistleblower only had access to data from the vaccinated.

That doesn’t mean the data leak is invalid, a conspiracy theory, or irrelevant. There were some very real and concerning questions raised which need answers. The reaction of the Ministry of Health and the Minister actually points to a conspiracy of silence on their part, not to the whistleblower. We do have whistleblower protection legislation in New Zealand. It states that:“An employee can make a protected disclosure (sometimes called ‘whistle blowing’) when they report serious wrongdoing in the workplace that they reasonably believe is true or likely to be true.”

The whistleblower was in the position that many people holding positions of responsibility in New Zealand now find themselves. We believe he acted responsibly because he disclosed very concerning information that the Ministry of Health has been withholding from public view.

We have unprecedented record high rates of excess deaths and hospitalisation which are continuing long past the peaks of Covid infection yet virtually no one among the media, the medical profession, and the government wants to talk about it. Instead, they are conspiring (yes, I do mean to use the term and don’t do so lightly) to hide the figures that will demonstrate the exact extent of COVID-19 vaccine harm.

This is all the more concerning since a rapidly growing number of recently published scientific papers we have been regularly reporting are pointing to a wide range of long term mRNA Covid harms including heart disease and immune deficiency, cancers, strokes and mental illness.

The message that most resonated with me during the interview was the heartfelt plea from the whistleblower for others to speak up. I encourage all those with inside knowledge to speak up if you haven’t already done so. We can’t continue with the disastrous censorship of health information enforced by the previous government. The health and longevity of the whole population is at stake.

SOURCE

Photo: hatchardreport.com

Covid-19 experimental injection

Whistleblower & Steve Kirsch – the whole story mainstream won’t be telling you (MUST WATCH)

2 Comments

For a full list of links on topic go HERE

Must hear truths mainstream won’t be telling you … ever. Barry alerted all… govt, his own senior management, Winston Peters, all MPs BEFORE going public … with CLEAR intent he wanted to save lives … they didn’t investigate, they locked him out of the database system and sent the wolves after him. Vicious arrest … the usual nazi style raid to intimidate. The video is in the last expose-news post however I’m posting it separately to grab your attention. You may want to warn folk with it.

https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=656f94b10681e680640f045f

Corona virus, Covid-19 experimental injection

New Zealand’s Byzantine Jab Exemptions

Leave a comment

From NEWZEALANDDOC @ substack

In my most recent article on New Zealand’s Jab mandates and exemptions for healthcare workers (which can be read here and here, and which included source documents and links thereof), and following upon my discussion with lawyer Liz Lambert of the legal processes at issue, I formulated a series of questions.

  1. When the jab mandates for healthcare workers were lifted, were all those healthcare workers who had been terminated for not getting the jab offered their jobs back?Answer: Another Official Information Act request has been made to address this issue, and a response has been delayed. I know of one physician who, refusing to receive a third jab, was fired from her District Health Board job while on vacation, but rehired upon her return after the mandates had been lifted. I know of another physician in similar circumstances as well.
  2. Were any religious exemptions granted? If so, by whom? How many?Answer: No, there were none.
  3. Of the temporary medical exemptions (9B) granted, the vast majority were given for those who had an ‘active’ covid infection. Who made the decisions about the other exemptions for adverse events, for example?Answer: The Director General of Health Ashley Bloomfield made the ultimate decisions along with a Panel of Six up until late July 2022 (please see Appendices One and Two in Source Documents). At this juncture Ayesha Verrall took over that role, and also took over the position of Minister for Covid Response from Chris Hipkins in June of that year. She had control of both medical (9B) and Service Disruption (12A) exemptions.
  4. Were Significant Service Disruption (SSD) exemptions contingent upon medical exemptions having been granted for those who fell under this category?  Answer: No. SSD exemptions were granted to those who did not necessarily have medical exemptions. I know of one physician who remained unjabbed but continued to practice, albeit via telehealth (remotely, not face to face). He did not apply for a medical exemption but he assumes that his administrative chiefs applied for an SSD to cover him. Two of my psychiatric colleagues in Wellington were terminated without having been given the option of telehealth.

READ AT THE LINK

https://newzealanddoc.substack.com/p/new-zealands-byzantine-jab-exemptions?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1144743&post_id=137793421&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email

Photo: pixabay.com

Covid-19 experimental injection

NZ’s official figures reveal Fully Vaccinated account for a shocking 73% of all CV Deaths since the beginning of the Pandemic in March 2020

2 Comments

And we were assured it was ‘safe and effective’ (Aussie, UK and Canada little better note at the link). … EWR

READ AT THE LINK

Photo: pixabay.com