Tag Archives: Mobile phone

Your Car is Spying on You MORE than Smart Home Devices and Cell Phones

Thanks Warren Woodward for the link:

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The gist is: they can collect super intimate information about you — from your medical information, your genetic information, to your “sex life” (seriously), to how fast you drive, where you drive, and what songs you play in your car — in huge quantities. They then use it to invent more data about you through “inferences” about things like your intelligence, abilities, and interests.

Reviewers at the Mozilla Foundation published a Privacy Report yesterday (9/6/2023) on cars, and they concluded:

All 25 car brands we researched earned our *Privacy Not Included warning label — making cars the official worst category of products for privacy that we have ever reviewed.

They stated in their review that car companies have many more data-collecting opportunities than other products and apps people use, more than even smart devices in homes or the cell phones people take wherever they go.

READ AT THE LINK

If you enjoy our posts, check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is

MOUNTING evidence proves RF radiation causes cancer

Many of us know this … in the face of continuous denial by the industry … folk need to wake up …. childhood cancers have spiked … A good expose is Josh del Sol’s ‘Take Back Your Power’ doco … EWNZ

rf-radiation

(NaturalHealth365)  In a new paper, an international team of experts – including a former director of the United States National Toxicology Program (NTP) – outline why they believe there is “substantial scientific evidence” that radiofrequency (RF) radiation has the potential to cause a wide range of harmful effects in humans.

From cancer to neurological effects and more, there are several potential health concerns you should be aware of – as well as several ways to protect your family.

“Substantial” evidence that exposure to RF radiation can lead to cancer, leading experts warn

According to the National Cancer Institute, radiofrequency (RF) radiation – described as a “type of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation” – is a form of “low-energy” radiation emitted from things like wireless and cellular telephones, radios, televisions, radar, satellites, microwave ovens, smart meters, wireless headphones and other wearable devices, computers, and wireless networks (WiFi).

“Although there have been health concerns,” the National Cancer Institute continues on a webpage defining the term, “most types of radiofrequency radiation have not been found to cause harmful health effects, including cancer.”  However, a recent paper published online in Environmental Research calls these claims into question.

The paper was co-authored by four subject matter experts, including two toxicologists, a physicist, and a double-board certified physician (Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology) and professor at the Yale School of Medicine.  In it, the authors begin by pointing out that the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded over a decade ago that RF radiation from cell phones is a “possible human carcinogen.”  They add that senior advisors from the World Health Organization (WHO) recently surmised that “if [radiofrequency radiation] were evaluated based on more current studies, it would be upgraded to a probable if not confirmed human carcinogen.”

In addition, 2018 animal research conducted by the U.S. NTP “provided clear evidence that mobile phone radiation caused cancer in male rats, along with cardiac and other systemic damage, as well as DNA damage in multiple organs in both rats and mice.”

Despite these and other findings showing neurological, endocrinological, and other systemic harms caused by RF radiation, the authors warn that “industry-affiliated scientists” routinely dismiss the growing body of evidence revealing harm from these ubiquitous radiation-emitting devices.

Moreover, the authors accuse the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of not appropriately utilizing the so-called “Precautionary Principle,” which, while imperfect, is the current standard by which governing agencies “[establish] public policy to guard the safety of the general public from potentially harmful materials, practices or technologies.”

For example, the authors note that the current exposure standards set by the FCC “consider only thermal effects” for their potential harm, despite “mounting evidence of non-thermal effects of exposure to electromagnetic radiation in biological systems and human populations.”

“We conclude that there is substantial scientific evidence that [RF radiation] causes cancer, endocrinological, neurological and other adverse health effects,” the authors say before mincing absolutely no words in their indictment of the FCC and other agencies tasked with protecting public health:  “In light of this evidence, the primary mission of public bodies, such as the FCC, to protect public health has not been fulfilled.  Rather, we find that industry convenience is being prioritized and thereby subjecting the public to avoidable risks” (emphasis ours).

Quoted in a March 3, 2023 article published by Children’s Health Defense, Co-author Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, “We know enough now to take steps to reduce exposure to this … It’s time.”

5 simple ways to reduce your exposure to radiofrequency radiation

Out of an abundance of caution, we encourage readers to reduce their families’ exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Ever wondered how?  Here are some suggestions from sources, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA):

  1. Spend less time on your cell phone and minimize or eliminate your use of wireless headphones, wireless speakers, and other technology devices that rely on Bluetooth or WiFi
  2. Especially avoid using your phone when your cell signal is weak, “as this causes cell phones to boost RF transmission power,” according to the FDA
  3. Avoid using your phone while traveling at high speeds (e.g., in a bus, car, or train), as this can also increase RF transmission power as your phone tries to connect to multiple different cell phone tower signals)
  4. When not using your phone, put it on airplane mode
  5. Turn off your home’s Wi-Fi routers at night
  6. Hard wire as many devices as you can … don’t use wireless technology

To learn more about how to stop cancer naturally … purchase the Stop Cancer Docu-Class, hosted by Jonathan Landsman.

Sources for this article include:

Sciencedirect.com
FDA.gov
CA.gov
Cancer.gov
Childrenshealthdefense.org

Reduce EMF Exposure – the facts, the risks & what to do about it – from Dr Mercola

By Dr. Mercola

The negative effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) continue to ignite conversations and controversy worldwide. The most dangerous pollution affecting you is the invisible sea of EMFs your body swims in daily. You are exposed to EMFs all day long, not only in public but inside your home, too. Most of the radiation emits from cellphones, cell towers, computers, smart meters and Wi-Fi, to name just a few of the culprits.

While it’s nearly impossible to avoid EMF exposure completely, there are practical ways to limit it. Given the number of EMFs that bombard you all day long, getting educated about the negative effects of EMFs is imperative to your well-being. Particularly if you are dealing with a serious illness, it is well worth your time to reduce your EMF exposure as much as possible. If you have been told EMFs are safe and not a danger to humans, you may want to consider:

  • The telecommunication industry has manipulated federal regulatory agencies, public health authorities and professionals through powerful and sophisticated lobbying efforts leaving consumers confused and unaware of the health risks associated with EMFs
  • Any negative health effects from EMFs, similar to smoking, may not be immediately noticeable, but will likely develop gradually over time. Cell phones indeed are the cigarette public health threat of the 21st century.

What Are EMFs?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, EMFs are “invisible areas of energy, often referred to as radiation, that are associated with the use of electrical power.”1

Most agree on the hazards associated with ionizing radiation, which is why the dental hygienist covers you with a lead apron when taking X-rays. Similarly, you would expect to get sunburned if your bare skin is overexposed to the sun’s powerful UV rays. Ionizing radiation is generally believed to have enough energy to break the covalent bonds in DNA but actually most of the damage is due to the oxidative stress resulting in excessive free radicals.

The type of EMF your cellphone emits is in the microwave 2 to 5 gigahertz range. Besides your cellphone, electronics such as baby monitors, Bluetooth devices, cordless phones, smart thermostats and Wi-Fi routers consistently emit microwave radiation at levels that may damage your mitochondria.

Interestingly I have reviewed a number of studies that show double and single strand DNA breaks are actually higher when exposed to nonionizing microwave radiation than ionizing radiation. This is believed to be due to the excessive oxidative stress that microwave exposure induces.

READ MORE

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/01/08/reduce-emf-exposure.aspx

A Top Oncologist Speaks about Wi-Fi in Schools

Published on Oct 27, 2015

Go to the parents blog http://safetechforschoolsmaryland.blo…
Listen to Lennart Hardell top oncologist speak about wireless, children and schools.
These clips were taken from the video of the
Press Conference on the 5th Paris Appeal Congress
at the Belgium Royal Academy of Medicine
by the Next UP Organization.
The full video of the press conference
can be found at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFAM…

The W-USA Clip is from http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local…

Read about Hardell and Agent Orange at this link
http://www.theguardian.com/science/20…
file:///Users/Home/Movies/Wondershare%20­Video%20Editor/Output/Hardell%20Take%203­.mov

RF-EMF emissions (Wireless radiation) “should be regarded as carcinogenic to humans, classifying it as group 1 according to the International Agency for the Research on Cancer classification. Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised.”

-Dr. Lennart Hardell 2014

Carlberg M, Hardell L. Decreased Survival of Glioma Patients with Astrocytoma Grade IV (Glioblastoma Multiforme) Associated with Long-Term Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(10):10790-10805

L. Hardell, M. Carlberg, Cell and cordless phone risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009, Pathophysiology (2014), Available online 29 October 2014


See our Wifi/EMF pages for more info &/or search categories for more articles (left side of page).

Please like our FB page &/or follow our blog, and do spread the word on all the untruths we have been told!

EnvirowatchRangitikei

Study Shows Electromagnetic fields from mobile phones accelerate mercury release from dental fillings

(NaturalNews) A fascinating scientific study has found that using mobile phones can accelerate the release of toxic mercury from dental fillings. This is especially noteworthy given that many people hold their mobile phones right next to their jaws when talking on them.

The study is one of millions linked on SCIENCE.NaturalNews.com, which hosts over 12 million published scientific studies from around the world. You can also find the abstract at the National Library of Medicine. A similar study which looked at MRI fields instead of mobile phone use is published at The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052689_dental_fillings_mobile_phones_mercury_vapor.html#ixzz3xzsQUSKd


 

Related:

WHY YOU SHOULD REPLACE YOUR DENTAL AMALGAM FILLINGS

“Research at the University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine and other prominent medical schools, have demonstrated that mercury vapor continuously escapes from a dental amalgam and 80 percent of this vapor is immediately absorbed through the lungs and into the bloodstream…


 

EnvirowatchRangitikei