Tag Archives: genes

A Christmas Gift to NZ’s Vaccinated – Brought to You by Pfizer and Their Deadly Contract

From nzdsos.com

Cited in the article:
“…a study of humans suffering from Long Covid analyzed their cellular DNA. The authors unexpectedly found genes uniquely specific to the Pfizer COVID vaccine in human blood cells. This finding proves that mRNA COVID vaccines permanently integrate into the DNA of some COVID-vaccinated people”.


Mathemetician Igor Chudov is the first we have seen to cover this absolute bombshell on DNA integration of the Pfizer mRNA product – something we have worried about since before the vaccine rollout. 

In Italy, Duhli et al have added to proof already existing that the vaccinated can be still expressing the spike protein 6 months following vaccination. However, their further finding of synthetic vaccine code integrated into host DNA of living cells of recipients is devastating, though unsurprising to those of us who understood the various pathways by which this could happen. 

Research had already shown the Pfizer mRNA process of reverse integration into human DNA in the lab but not so far in living humans.
Pfizer In Vitro Integration
Image captured for criticism/review and reporting current events under Fair Dealing – The Copyright Act 1994

Corrupting the human genome is a forever situation if mutant additions are passed to offspring, but chronic diseases and, especially cancer, can occur in the vaccinated in this lifetime.

Whether due to bystander viral reverse transcriptase, LINE-1 integration, oncogenic SV40 code, or bacterial plasmid contamination, genome corruption shown in this Italian paper ought to bring this fatal “gene transfer product” (Pfizer’s own words) weapon to a halt. But how many times have we heard that since the debacle began? 

Our regulators have been mostly mute so far on all the safety signals galore, including effects on fertility, stillbirths and miscarriages; the spike protein as the actual agent of harm to the body; plasmidgate; frame-shifted multiple prion products; and secret MOH data showing vaccine harms. Even when we rumbled their trick of mis-classifying vaccine status to try to hide vaccine harms and uselessness, they still ploughed on recklessly. 

So far, our massive hand-wringing has come to nought, but the explanation for that is straightforward. Pfizer’s contract forbids ANY statement or action by ANYONE that might reduce vaccine sales (as discussed in this very informative interview with investigator Nadine Connock, see our review of the interview here). This includes doctors, politicians, the press, judges, and presumably too, the NZ Police, since they have refused to investigate clear evidence of post vaccine deaths. Instead they have preferred to hide behind the government, via Medsafe and the Minister of Health. 

This deal with the devil was led by a government lawyer – now on the Medical Council, in a clear conflict of interest – and signed by the last government, behind the deception of “an unprecedented global health emergency” – as marketed by the  World Health Organisation: unelected, private, unaccountable and funded by vaccine investors. The lie of this being far deadlier than the common flu was disproven very early on by the WHO’s own statistics, and as clearly laughable as the attempts to cover-up the truth of SARS CoV-2 being a man-made bioweapon. 

Presumably the new government is to be held to the Pfizer contract signed by the Ardern administration, which means the promise of a truly effective inquiry could be a pipe dream without exposing and striking out the contract first, as Crown Law will fling it’s dead body before attempts to get a proper inquiry going.

However, there are some potential pathways to demolish this deadly deal. In law, “fraud vitiates everything”, including contracts; the bait and switch product delivered to NZ was produced very differently to the one submitted for approval to regulators; consumer protections have been breached, along with GMO legislation; there have been multiple breaches of the Medicines Act; officials have lied to push the narrative; multiple human rights have been ignored (including the most prime, the right to life) and so it is easy to see pathways to serious criminal charges.

Multiple lines of evidence show that government knew that people had died and been seriously harmed very early on – in fact, before the first jab was ever given here – and more would follow. To continue in that certain knowledge of harms to come, as they are STILL doing, cannot be tolerated.

 If our laws actually prove to allow criminal acts because a drug company says so, it is surely time for the people to ask some hard questions about the country we want. This is happening already in other nations, and this latest proof of the lies and their terrible truths must surely speed the process of retaking humanity, whatever the attacks on its genome.

Image by yuyun fan from Pixabay

Scientists, Using Software to Fight Dubious Cancer Research

WHILE TRAWLING THROUGH scientific studies on cancer research in 2015, Jennifer Byrne noticed something strange. One after another, papers were describing strikingly similar experiments involving a particular gene associated with breast cancer and childhood leukemia. Byrne, a professor of molecular oncology at The University of Sydney, recognized the gene immediately because she was part of a team that cloned it two decades earlier.

The problem, she realized upon closer inspection, was that the papers, all of them from China, referred to the wrong nucleotide sequence — a unique series of letters that describes the makeup of a given piece of DNA — being used to deactivate the gene and observe the resulting effects in cancer cells. Either the experiments weren’t examining what they claimed, or they hadn’t been done as described.

“The sequence was being described as one thing, but was sometimes used as if it were something different,” Byrne says. “It’s a bit like applying the same barcode to different items in a supermarket, so you get charged for a pair of shoes when you are actually buying a bag of lettuce.”

What’s worse, each dubious paper contained the seeds of potentially more bad research.

READ MORE

https://undark.org/article/software-byrne-cancer-research-fraud/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=SocialWarfareShares

The ‘Deadly Breast Cancer Gene’ is a Myth, Lancet Study Confirms

Sayer Ji, Green Med Info
Waking Times 

new Lancet Oncology study, reported widely in the mainstream media, confirms that the so-called “breast cancer genes,” i.e. BRCA1/2, do not have the power to determine breast cancer survival outcomes, as widely believed by the medical profession.

The study titled, “Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study,” found,

“[There is] no significant difference in overall survival or distant disease-free survival between patients carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and patients without these mutations after a diagnosis of breast cancer.”

The BBC broke down the study’s findings in greater detail, in their online article titled, “Breast cancer survival ‘unaffected by faulty gene‘”

“The study, published in The Lancet Oncology, found 12% of 2,733 women aged 18 to 40 treated for breast cancer at 127 hospitals across the UK between 2000 and 2008 had a BRCA mutation.

The women’s medical records were tracked for up to 10 years.

During this time, 651 of the women died from breast cancer, and those with the BRCA mutation were equally likely to have survived at the two-, five- and 10-year mark as those without the genetic mutation.

This was not affected by the women’s body mass index or ethnicity.

About a third of those with the BRCA mutation had a double mastectomy to remove both breasts after being diagnosed with cancer. This surgery did not appear to improve their chances of survival at the 10-year mark.”

The study has powerful implications for the future of breast screening programs and the standard of care for ‘breast cancer’ patients. So powerful is the belief that BRCA genes ’cause’ breast cancer, that millions around the world consider it fact. Celebrities like Angelina Jolie have added fuel to the fire of this dangerous myth, by electing to have her breasts removed ‘prophylactically’ due to her BRCA status and the recommendations of her physicians. I discussed questionable nature of this decision in a previous article titled, Did Angelina Jolie Make A Mistake By Acting On The ‘Breast Cancer Gene’ Theory? I elaborated further on the topic in an article titled, “Pinkwashing Hell: Breast Removal as a Form of ‘Prevention‘.”

READ MORE

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2018/01/17/deadly-breast-cancer-gene-myth-lancet-study-confirms/?utm_source=Waking+Times+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2b8798e717-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_term=0_25f1e048c1-2b8798e717-54601985

Developments in Chemical Biotechnology Continue to Threaten Environmental and Human Health

Following our recent approval in clean green, GE free Enzed of GM potato crops this is a bit of a farce given Helen Clarke (Labour note for those who are rejoicing at the other wing of the same bird that’s currently now in) approved the growing to harvest of GM corn in 2000 or thereabouts. It was uncovered, having already been planted, then ordered to be pulled up by Clarke who then flip flopped after a bit of corporate persuasion. So here it is again, some 17 odd years later … yes it is farcical. They’ve been tampering with the genes of all sorts including animals, all along. This kind of food has already been independently researched & found seriously wanting. Eat it at your own risk I would say. EnvirowatchRangitikei

Story at-a-glance

  • Corporate GMO propaganda is hitting the big screen. Forty-five scientists, academics and writers have signed a statement calling the food industry-funded film, “Food Evolution,” a piece of corporate propaganda that misrepresents the GMO issue
  • EPA has approved RNAi corn for human consumption, which is based on “gene silencing” technology. Research suggests RNA may have the ability to silence genes inside your body as well
  • A new generation of GMO crops resistant to dicamba is wreaking havoc across the U.S., as neighbors to farms growing dicamba-resistant crops report massive crop destruction from dicamba drift

By Dr. Mercola

Pesticides are taking a major toll on health across the globe. According to a recent United Nations (UN) report,1 pesticides are responsible for 200,000 acute poisoning deaths each year, and chronic exposure has been linked to cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease, hormone disruption, developmental disorders and sterility.2

In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a research arm of the World Health Organization and the “gold standard” in carcinogenicity research, found glyphosate — the active ingredient in Roundup, the most widely used herbicide in the world — is a probable human carcinogen.3,4 As of July 2017, glyphosate is listed as a known carcinogen under California’s Proposition 65,5 which means products containing glyphosate must carry a cancer warning label.

Pesticides like Roundup also threaten the health of the soil, thereby threatening the very future of agriculture itself, as healthy soils are key for growing food.6 So grave are the concerns over the health and environmental effects of pesticides, the UN’s report proposes a global treaty to phase them out and transition to a more sustainable agricultural system.

All of this is terrible news for the chemical industry in general, and Monsanto in particular. Last year, Monsanto accepted a $66 billion takeover bid from Bayer AG,7,8,9 which would make the new entity the largest seed and pesticide company in the world. The merger is expected to be finalized by the end of 2017. However, as noted in the Bloomberg video report above, suspicions of carcinogenicity now pose a serious threat to this deal.

Court Will Determine Roundup’s Role in Cancer

Plaintiffs10 in a class-action lawsuit against Monsanto claim Roundup caused or contributed to their non-Hodgkin lymphoma.11,12 The outcome of this lawsuit may influence Bayer’s decision to acquire Monsanto or back out of the deal. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) reevaluation of glyphosate’s toxicity may also have a bearing on the planned merger, although it will not influence the litigation against Monsanto.

U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria, who presides over multi-district litigation currently involving 310 cancer victims’ lawsuits against Monsanto, has stated that the scientific evidence presented at trial is what will settle the question of whether glyphosate can cause cancer — not the determination by the IARC or the EPA. According to Bloomberg:13

“Chhabria has allowed the plaintiffs wide latitude to collect evidence on Monsanto’s health-effects research over the years, which the plaintiffs hope will show the company manipulated the data.

In March he unsealed dozens of Monsanto’s confidential documents for the public to see. The records show internal deliberations on how to present the science on glyphosate’s health impacts and manage a global public-relations campaign to assure consumers and regulators that Roundup is safe.”

EPA Has a History of Protecting Chemical Industry

The litigation has brought to light evidence showing how the EPA has colluded with Monsanto to protect the company’s interests. For example, email correspondence reveals Jess Rowland — who was the associate director of the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs and a key author of the EPA’s controversial glyphosate report — helped stop a glyphosate investigation by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) on Monsanto’s behalf.14,15

READ MORE

 

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/08/01/chemical-biotechnology-threatens-environmental-human-health.aspx