Category Archives: euthanasia

A sprawling global network is pushing governments toward permissive, industrial-scale euthanasia


From Frank Bergman

“Investigative reporter Asra Nomani revealed a sprawling global network pushing governments toward permissive, industrial-scale euthanasia.

Her findings are alarming:

15,000 Canadians died via assisted suicide in 2023, now the 5th leading cause of death in the country. The Netherlands and Belgium routinely approve euthanasia for mental illness, minor children, and even newborn infants deemed to have “unbearable suffering.” Dutch law already allows doctors to kill children as young as one year old, with activists pushing to lower the age even further. The Dutch model has become the globalists’ blueprint, and now they’re racing to dismantle the final legal barriers. America is not far behind.”


Dutch Government Moves to Lift All Restrictions on Euthanasia

The Dutch government is taking a stunning step toward fully decriminalizing euthanasia, preparing to eliminate the last remaining restrictions on state-sanctioned assisted suicide after a lobbying blitz from far-left activist groups.

Dutch media reports confirm that Parliament will now debate a proposal that would allow unrestricted, open-ended euthanasia, turning the Netherlands into one of the most radical death regimes on Earth.

A petition demanding full legalization surpassed the required 75,000 signatures and is backed by the NGO Stichting Levenseinderegie (the End-of-Life Self-Direction Foundation).

The far-left group led by psychologist-turned-euthanasia evangelist Wim van Dijk.

The NGO openly campaigns for a future in which virtually anyone, regardless of medical condition, age, or circumstance, can receive state-approved suicide on demand.

Globalist Death Model Spreading Worldwide

The Netherlands already legalized euthanasia in 2002, but with guardrails, at least on paper.

Those limits required physician approval, certain qualifying conditions, and safeguards.

However, critics have been warning that those “safeguards” were a façade, and they were right.

Now, activists and radical lawmakers from the left-wing Democrats 66 (D66) party are preparing to introduce legislation next session that would strip away the remaining restrictions entirely.

The timing is no coincidence.

The Netherlands has seen explosive growth in state-sanctioned deaths.

In 2025 alone, the government killed a staggering 10,000 Dutch residents via euthanasia, according to DutchNews.

However, experts warn the real number may be far higher.

Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition says the Dutch government doesn’t even report all euthanasia deaths.

In a government-commissioned review, investigators uncovered:

That last category means over 500 people were euthanized without asking for it, a fact that should chill anyone who believes human life has value.

A Worldwide Industry of Engineered Death

Investigative reporter Asra Nomani exposed what she calls “Assisted Suicide Inc.”

Nomani revealed a sprawling global network pushing governments toward permissive, industrial-scale euthanasia.

Her findings are alarming:

   • 15,000 Canadians died via assisted suicide in 2023, now the 5th leading cause of death in the country.

   • The Netherlands and Belgium routinely approve euthanasia for mental illness, minor children, and even newborn infants deemed to have “unbearable suffering.”

   • Dutch law already allows doctors to kill children as young as one year old, with activists pushing to lower the age even further.

The Dutch model has become the globalists’ blueprint, and now they’re racing to dismantle the final legal barriers.

America Is Not Far Behind

While Europe accelerates this march toward state-managed death, the United States is also experiencing a wave of pro-euthanasia legislation:

Illinois is pushing to legalize physician-assisted suicide.

Montana and New York are considering similar bills.

Oregon reported 376 assisted suicides in 2024, a number that grows every year.

Once a fringe idea, euthanasia is now becoming a mainstream policy priority among Western left-wing governments, and activists aren’t stopping until death becomes a “service,” not a last resort.

Chilling Direction for the West

Critics warn the Netherlands is now openly embracing a culture where:

   • Life is negotiable

   • Death is a bureaucratic service

   • Vulnerable citizens, including the elderlydisabledpoormentally ill, and children, are at risk

The push to completely decriminalize euthanasia marks the most extreme step yet, signaling a grim future where state-sanctioned death is treated as a “right,” a “solution,” and ultimately, a weapon.

Slay News will continue tracking the debate as the Dutch Parliament prepares to consider one of the most radical euthanasia expansions in modern history.

READ MORE – Alarms Raised Over Push to Euthanize Canadian Police Veterans


EWNZ comment:
Where is NZ up to in this? Wikipedia reports thatEuthanasia became legal in New Zealand when the End of Life Choice Act 2019 took full effect on 7 November 2021. “ One wonders, given the scenarios one hears about these days of experiences folk are having in hospitals with their loved ones, if this is not already in effect albeit informally. “We can’t do any more for your family member” and Morphine is administered along with Midazolam ‘to keep them comfortable’ until they pass. My elderly neighbour, no relatives nearby, was treated periodically for a few years prior with occasional hospital admissions, then suddenly, ‘we can’t do any more’ (aka I suspect, he has reached his financial limit) followed by 3 choices … home with home help, a care home nearby or hospice. He chose hospice, dear man, and whilst I visited him there for his remaining 2 weeks of life, I noted brochures at the foyer indicating more hospices were being built in his nearby home town‘because of the aging population’. Note, hospices used to be for terminal folk, not aging folk. I smelled a rat right then. Call me suspicious, I don’t care, but old folk usually went to care homes when they couldn’t live independently, not to hospices. Then there is the Liverpool Care Pathway (see here also). Nil by mouth. That is the ‘care’ they administer. It’s stopped we’re told but I’ve heard of folk receiving this treatment in NZ. We need to stay vigilant and not leave our loved ones alone in hospital.

SOURCE

RELATED
‘Untold damage’: Global assisted suicide movement targets children

10 Things You MUST KNOW Before Your Next Hospital Visit (and other related info)

Photo credit: slaynews.com

Other news this week

So much news, it’s where to start?!

Catherine Austin Fitts: The Current Administration Was Put Into Place by the Bankers to Get the Control Grid Accomplished

While You Were Distracted: Trump’s GENIUS Act CBDC Will Allow Government to Punish Vaccine Mandate Refusers by Freezing Bank Accounts

Insider Blows Whistle on Canada’s Shocking Euthanisia Methods: ‘Drowned to Death’

Canada Pushes to Begin Euthanizing Children

The U.S.A. JUST ROLLED OUT FULL SCALE Digital ID

Albert Benavides Speaks Out Against mRNA With James Roguski

“Mom” forces her child to attempt “change” gender

British WWII Veteran Breaks Down On National Television – ‘The Sacrifice Wasn’t Worth The Result, It Is Downside Worse Than What It Was When I Fought For It’

Deaths by Dates Down Under — Dispatch #002

ChatGPT just confirmed: All of the fully vaxxed/unvaxxed studies show vaccines cause autism

We’ve Lost Our Minds: The INSANE New Way People Think About Health & WEIGHT LOSS

From Analog to Digital to Cellular: The Complete Guide to Technological Capture

THE BLUEPRINT FOR OUR DESTRUCTION

Ostrich MASSACRE in Canada

BREAKING: 51 Million-Person Study Finds COVID-19 “Vaccines” Increase Risk of Respiratory Infections by up to 559%

BREAKING SCANDAL: Bombshell Testimony Exposes Canadian Government’s Push to EUTHANIZE VETERANS (Canada has euthanized 90,000 people since 2016)

Testimony in Ottawa sparks national disgust as veterans speak out

From Frank Bergman 
via Exposing the Darkness

A fiery parliamentary hearing triggered an uproar after a CAF veteran testified that more than 20 former soldiers were allegedly pressured to accept euthanasia.

The testimony has sparked fury, disbelief, and demands for answers as citizens question how such a practice could happen under any government.

By Frank Bergman November 13, 2025

An alarming testimony before Canada’s House of Commons has blown open grave allegations that the Liberal government is ramping up pressure to euthanize military veterans under the nation’s rapidly expanding “assisted suicide” regime.

The explosive allegations were revealed in a parliamentary testimony from Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) veteran.

Sheren told MPs during a hearing before the Canadian Veterans Affairs Committee that she has firsthand evidence showing the practice is far more widespread than officials admit.

She told the nation’s top lawmakers that she has evidence that multiple veterans have been pressured into being euthanized under the government’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

Sheren testified that “over 20 veterans have confirmed being offered MAiD” instead of more expensive treatments.

“I have the proof, and I have proof of more,” she told lawmakers.

The claims follow recent reports that Canada’s socialized healthcare system is now saving $136 million a year by euthanizing patients instead of treating them.

During the hearing, Conservative MP Blake Richards asked Sheren if she was willing to provide evidence supporting her claims.

Sheren confirmed that the veterans have submitted written testimonies or “actual audio recordings” documenting the unsolicited offers of euthanasia.

According to Sheren, many others remain silent out of fear.

“We also have other individuals who are too afraid to come forward because Veterans Affairs has threatened their benefits,” she said.

Sheren, a Canadian combat veteran and artillery gunner, added that some were even offered non-disclosure agreements and “payouts if they were to take it.”

Veterans Affairs Canada told media outlets that its “employees have no role or mandate to recommend or raise (MAiD).”

Yet similar allegations have surfaced before.

Last year, it was revealed that the federal department responsible for supporting Canadian veterans had apparently acted to suppress documentation on euthanasia practices.

It followed reports that caseworkers attempted to railroad struggling former service members into euthanasia.

Slay News previously published a report highlighting bombshell revelations from Sheren on the treatment of veterans.

Sheren explained on a podcast with Dr. Jordan Peterson last year that the drugs used in MAiD essentially waterboard a person to death.

Assisted suicide was legalized in 2016 by the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

A new report from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition shows the devastating scale of the program: Canada has euthanized 90,000 people since 2016.

However, some are still hopeful that the Liberal government’s eugenics agenda can be turned around.

Last week, a Conservative MP’s private member’s bill, which would ban individuals with mental illness from being euthanized, received full support from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

The revelations point to an alarming reality that Canada’s euthanasia system is no longer confined to edge-case medical situations.

Instead, it is increasingly becoming a state-endorsed “solution” for vulnerable citizens, including those who once served their country.

SOURCE

Photo Credit: Pixabay.com

Coming Soon to a Country Near You: Canadian Government Is Euthanizing Mentally Ill and Disabled Citizens: ‘It’s EUGENICS’

Watch for the Liverpool Care Pathway also. Nil by mouth often without telling the patient’s family. I am aware from feedback and my own observations that the ‘protocol’ if you could call it that, is used here in NZ. It’s been said it’s no longer used . It is a forerunner I’d guess to what’s happening now. Dr Vernon Coleman has also warned us what is coming along the lines of euthanasia. EWNZ

By Frank Bergman @ Slay News
via Exposing the Darkness

A prominent expert is warning the public that the Canadian government is now euthanizing mentally ill and disabled citizens as part of a “eugenics” agenda that has been thinly disguised as “assisted suicide.”

The chilling warning was issued by Kelsi Sheren, a military veteran-turned-anti-euthanasia activist.

Specifically, Sheren is sounding the alarm about Canada’s taxpayer-funded Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

During a whistleblowing new interview with Triggernometry, Sheren said:

“MAiD is medical assistance in dying, but let’s call it what it is.

“It’s eugenics. It’s not MAiD. It’s eugenics.

“And the reason I say that so emphatically is because the statistics around who is using medical assistance and dying versus who is being euthanized are radically different.”

MAiD was originally launched by the Canadian government in 2016 to help terminally ill patients end their suffering.

However, Sheren is among several experts warning that MAiD has morphed into something more sinister.

The “assisted suicide” program has now become a system that increasingly targets people with mental health challenges, disabilities, and other non-terminal conditions.

Essentially, the citizens targeted for euthanasia are those requiring long-term care who are considered a burden on Canada’s taxpayer-funded socialized healthcare system.

“We had a girl in British Columbia last year… walked into Vancouver hospital,” Sheren continues.

“She was suicidal…

“She was met by the doctors who told her she couldn’t see psychiatrists for six months…

“And then she was then sat down while the nurse put her hand on her knee and said, ‘Have you heard of MAID?’ to a vulnerable person who just expressed that she was suicidal.”

Sheren asserts that this practice is the same eugenics program pioneered by the Nazis.

The controversial historical practice aims to “improve” society by controlling who gets to live or reproduce.

Eugenics was even popular among American progressives until it became taboo following World War Two.

“This is a movement to remove the vulnerable, disabled, liabilities, burdens on society, full stop,” Sheren notes.

“That’s what this is,” she emphasizes.

“This is not compassion and care dying with dignity or empathy.

“This is, let’s remove the problems from society.”

“We are turning healthcare practitioners who went into the practice to help people,” Sheren adds.

“We are turning them into everyday serial killers.

“And there is a moral issue to that, that those doctors, those family members, were not like, not ready, not trained to handle at all.”

WATCH:

Expert Warns Canadian Government Is Euthanizing Mentally Ill and Disabled Citizens: ‘It’s Eugenics’

In recent years, Canada’s liberal government has expanded the euthanasia laws to include people who might be struggling with depression, anxiety, or other treatable conditions.

The government is now euthanizing citizens suffering from poverty and homelessness, vaccine injuries, and even hearing loss.

FULL VIDEO:

Source: slaynews.com

Canada now offering Assisted SUICIDE to Vax-Injured Victims

From Stew Peters @ Rumble

Dr. William Makis joins Stew to discuss how Canada is now offering assisted suicide to victims of the safe and effective !

The world needs to know the truth that fake history has concealed. WATCH Old World Order, and find out more at: https://stewpeters.com/owo/

VIDEO AT THIS LINK

See also:

Canada’s euthanasia programme offers the MAiD “treatment” to cancer patients waiting on long lists to see an oncologist

Facts Everyone Should Know about Euthanasia

Further articles on euthanasia HERE

 

Health Canada & Veterans Affairs – the two Federal Govt partners in release of new coloring & activity book on ‘MAiD’: suicide for Canadian children

From Mark Crispin Miller

SOURCE

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/trudeaus-government-now-teaching?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

VIDEO FROM MARIA ZEEE ON TOPIC

LIVE @ 8: Uncensored: Canadian Government is Promoting SUICIDE to CHILDREN!!!

Image by Aline Ponce from Pixabay

Canada is now euthanizing 10,000 of its citizens a year – and some of the horrific stories of its ultra-permissive policy will horrify you

“Canadian army veteran and Paralympian Christine Gauthier [in a battle to obtain a stairlift for her home] was offered an extraordinary alternative. A Canadian official told her in 2019 that if her life was so difficult and she so ‘desperate’, the government would help her to kill herself. ‘”

And so the cull continues … EWR


From dailymail.co.uk

Winston Churchill famously reassured the U.S. that its long northern border was ‘guarded only by neighbourly respect and honourable obligations’.

And generations of US leaders have tended to agree – there’s nothing to worry about from solid and reliably uncontroversial Canada.

Until now, that is.

Anyone who ever thought that the compassionate response to extreme human suffering is a society that helps people find permanent release from their pain may want to look at some of the horror stories coming out of Canada recently.

To be clear, euthanasia laws in the US are nothing like those of its neighbor to the north. But American acceptance of the practice has been growing for decades despite warnings that legalized suicide is a slippery slope toward a calamitous debasement of human life.

Canada, a country that prides itself on its open-mindedness and tolerance, has the most permissive rules on euthanasia in the world – and the results have been frankly terrifying.

Last year, more than 10,000 people in Canada – astonishingly that’s over three percent of all deaths there – ended their lives via euthanasia, an increase of a third on the previous year. And it’s likely to keep rising: next year, Canada is set to allow people to die exclusively for mental health reasons.

Only last week, a jaw-dropping story emerged of how, five years into an infuriating battle to obtain a stairlift for her home, Canadian army veteran and Paralympian Christine Gauthier was offered an extraordinary alternative.

A Canadian official told her in 2019 that if her life was so difficult and she so ‘desperate’, the government would help her to kill herself. ‘I have a letter saying that if you’re so desperate, madam, we can offer you MAiD, medical assistance in dying,’ the paraplegic ex-army corporal testified to Canadian MPs.

READ AT THE LINK

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11507875/America-afraid-Canada-euthanizing-10-000-citizens-year-TOM-LEONARD.html

Photo: unsplash.com

Other headlines

Peru: young doctor dead three weeks after Sinopharm COVID-19 “vaccine”
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/03/29/peru-young-doctor-dead-three-weeks-after-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine/

Texas Doctor Exposes Dangers of COVID-19 Vaccine (bitchute.com) 

(NZ) Fears euthanasia training will just be online course
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/439361/fears-euthanasia-training-will-just-be-online-course?fbclid=IwAR2C_bt6WPhaf0vmFRGdu–hVdtw5bzzC_cmN6IiuxifQ354wTgOis8gjMk

Is Bill Gates Internationally Immune From Prosecution? (bitchute.com)

Report: Sports Cheat Philosophy Professor Lives With A Pedophile – Gender Heretics.org

Canal Road tree protesters in court facing trespassing charges | New Zealand Geographic (nzgeo.com)

Image by Roy Buri from Pixabay

Netherlands legalizes euthanasia for terminally ill children; Belgian children also being euthanized & Canada embraces assisted suicide

Human life & its sanctity now throwaway items sadly. Sickness & death everywhere & it is being normalized. EWR

“The Netherlands has agreed on plans to make euthanasia legal for terminally ill children under the age of 12.”

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2020/october/unbelievably-evil-netherlands-legalizes-euthanasia-for-terminally-sick-children-under-12?fbclid=IwAR1w55VcGkQHSGCBQ5BNDniFFM_5W-Zo43gEnu8ytdVwriQ2Zy5UAF5IxpM

“According to a recently released report, three children in Belgium under the age of 18 were given lethal injections after they chose to die.”

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/cwn/2018/august/belgian-children-being-euthanized-as-canada-also-embraces-culture-of-legally-assisted-suicide?fbclid=IwAR3P7Azl4kl4zWsAn8wP3hlHckfhOoK7l2tyB7cBAeQ-ABDZuJNAxedw9ak

Euthanasia ‘made easy’ for you?

“Euthanasia advocate Philip Nitschke has created a 3D-printed suicide machine that allows users to administer their own death in a matter of minutes.” dezeen.com

In my humble opinion, an indication of the slippery slope we’re on. Yes I get the release from pain etc etc… that is a whole different scenario and everybody has an opinion on that. Fair enough. But in a climate today of escalating suicides and great mental distress with the cv debacle this makes it all just too easy. Not to mention sad because it won’t just be those teetering on the brink with terminal illness who will buy into this. If you listen to the video at the first link you’ll hear you can even be in charge of creating this chilling pod. The whole impression you get of course is that nobody has been responsible for you making this decision. Assisted suicide not required. All the tools you need at the ready. Absolution from blame on anybody else. When I first saw this item on Facebook it did not include a link like this one. Then a comment was added with a link to a site saying it was satire which I looked at and was convinced. However I’ve since been pointed to this site so it is indeed not satire & I am left wondering who added the satire link and why? If you search around this site you will also see that you can be assisted to artificially inseminate yourself (with pleasure, no pun intended). Can you see the push to no gender? Why else are the little kids being reassigned their sex or being neutered? Before they are even old enough to make such a decision? Then there are the artificial inflatable sex dolls that folk are buying into. It’s all sick to the hilt. And I haven’t even mentioned the kids dolls with sexual capabilities. We won’t go there. Humanity taken over by psychopaths basically. Psychos who want rid of 90% of the population (openly stated) and are busily outworking their plan while folk slumber on. Research Artificial Intelligence – AI. They have sick ideas for where they have us headed. (Note, the FB link has several other links about Dr Death and the euthanasia debate FYI).

EWR

https://www.dezeen.com/2019/05/22/philip-nitschke-death-pod-design/?fbclid=IwAR2Tob6h0gKmMvC8IbAqUI2gC8QsEPmKybvWghTsb3tXHeXYPL41UE4Rlcs

RELATED: Scientific Plan to Isolate All Humans From Contact Untact

Further info:

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

The push for child euthanasia without parental permission!

From caldronpool.com

…ultimately the wishes of capable patients with respect to confidentiality must be respected,’ the essay stated.

Bioethicists have started preparing the way for the legalisation of child euthanasia in Canada, with one of the proposals advocating assisted suicide without parental approval.

Euthanasia in Canada is currently only available to capable patients aged 18 years or older, however the medical essay titled, Medically Assisted Dying in a Paediatric Hospital, published in the Oxford-based Journal of Medical Ethics, was written “with an eye to the near future when capable young people may gain access to Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID).”

In all other regards [than who initiates the euthanasia discussion], our working group has, at present, elected to conceptualise MAID as practically and ethically equivalent to other medical practices that result in the end of life. This theorisation of MAID is justified on the grounds that these practices share a common purpose of alleviating unendurable suffering and facilitate the patient dying on their own terms…and is reflective of our concern that the conceptualisation of MAID should not place additional burdens on the patient or function to limit the rights and freedoms to which patients are typically entitled.

The proposal goes on to state, if a child is mature enough to make decisions, doctors will not be required to inform parents or family members about the child’s decision to commit suicide.

If, however, a capable [child] patient explicitly indicates that they do not want their family members involved in their decision-making, although healthcare providers may encourage the patient to reconsider and involve their family, ultimately the wishes of capable patients with respect to confidentiality must be respected. If we regard MAID as practically and ethically equivalent to other medical decisions that result in the end of life, then confidentiality regarding MAID should be managed in this same way.

Can you imagine a child discussing euthanasia with a trigger-happy doctor but deciding not to include her parents because she knows they’d oppose it? Can you imagine her parents turning up to the hospital to see their daughter, only to find an empty bed?

The essay goes on to suggest protections for medical staff willing to provide assisted suicide for children. “We will not make public the names of the healthcare providers at The Hospital for Sick Children who have volunteered to provide MAID, nor will we disclose a full list of persons who comprised our working group.”

We will, however, as an institution, publicly discuss the provision of MAID in an effort to normalise this procedure and reduce social stigma for everyone involved. It is right and appropriate for this duty to fall to a well-resourced institution rather than rest on the shoulders of individual patients and providers.

When it comes to euthanasia, the slope is slippery indeed. Assisted suicide is always sold with temporary restrictions.

Also see: Netherlands, euthanasia and the very slippery slope.

If euthanasia is no longer restricted to adults, we have good reason to think someday it will no longer be restricted to the terminally ill. Rather, it will be extended to people with varying quality of life circumstances. How do we know this? Because it’s already happening in the Netherlands.

SOURCE

https://caldronpool.com/push-for-child-euthanasia-without-parental-permission/?fbclid=IwAR1w7asroOShRTDYVH_lQLsonQrbfvUsF-V85oxVFUrCIdJrW01-6je9Bmk

Following in the footsteps of communist China, CANADA begins harvesting organs from euthanized humans

From NaturalNews.com

Natural News) Twenty years ago, I remember telling a physician friend of mine that China was harvesting organs from political prisoners. The doctor — a wine-drinking liberal academic — scoffed at the idea and claimed that if something like that were going on, he would have heard about it by now. (This is how doctors think. If they don’t discover information first, they discount anyone else bringing it to them.)

Now, twenty years later, an independent tribunal has unanimously concluded that organ harvesting in communist China takes place on “a significant scale.”

“Forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale,” said chair of the tribunal, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, as reported by The Epoch Times. “The panel further concluded that adherents of the spiritual practice Falun Gong have been one of the main sources of organ supply. Falun Gong, a spiritual discipline consisting of meditation exercises and moral teachings based on truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance, has been brutally persecuted by the Chinese regime for the past two decades.”

Breitbart.com also reports:

Gutmann’s research and writing, in conjunction with authors David Kilgour and David Matas, exposed a million-dollar Chinese industry centered around the killing of political prisoners – mostly Falun Gong members, but some Christians, Uighur Muslims, and others considered enemies of the state – and extracting of livers, kidneys, hearts, and other vital organs to sell to buyers in need.

I’ve been reporting this for years on Natural News and other sites, but of course we are banned by the communist-linked tech giants like Facebook and Twitter for daring to tell the truth about the organ harvesting factories in China.

The power of the elements: Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality, natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap, black walnut hulls, menthol crystals and more. Zero artificial sweeteners, colors or alcohol. Learn more at the Health Ranger Storeand help support this news site.

Now, organ harvesting is being carried out in Canada, too

Following in the footsteps of the communist Chinese, Canada is now pursuing organ harvesting from euthanized patients. As reported by LifeSiteNews:

[T]he Canadian Medical Association (CMA) has issued guidelines for how the harvesting of organs from people who elect to be killed by medical practitioners should work. Despite some hand-wringing about ethics, the June 3 document allows doctors to canvas their vulnerable, suicidal patients for their organs.

Even worse, it is well known that doctors and hospitals, driven by extreme greed and cruelty, often kill patients through the process of harvesting their organs. In other words, the patients aren’t really dead until the organ harvesting begins. As explained via LifeSiteNews:

Alex Schadenberg of Canada’s Euthansia Prevention Coalition believes that accepting organs from euthanasia victims will indeed lead to death by organ donation.

“The acceptance of organ donation after euthanasia leads to the pressure to do euthanasia by organ donation,” he told LifeSiteNews.

“The concept that organ donation and euthanasia can be separated is false. The person will be prepared for the organ donation and the euthanasia simultaneously to make the procedure most effective.”

It is in the financial interests of the doctors, organ transplant surgeons and medical facilities, in other words, to not really wait until the patient is dead before harvesting their organs. The more “fresh” the organs are, the more successful the chances of transplant surgery involving a recipient. Yes, the euthanasia in Canada is by consent, which makes it different from China’s forced political prisoner executions and organ harvesting operations, but organ harvesting is a slippery slope, and Canada is now on that slope with apparently nothing stopping doctors from being caught up in conflicts of interest that benefit the medical establishment, not individual patients.

Doctors don’t wait for patients to die before harvesting their organs

As published in a Medicine.news article that I authored, a new science study proves that doctors do not wait for patients to die before harvesting their organs:

…you’re still alive, conscious and aware for several minutes after your heart stops beating. Just because the heart stops doesn’t instantly disconnect the activity of the brain.

“This means you are essentially ‘trapped’ inside your dead body with your brain still working,” reports Fox News. If you’re an organ donor, that’s the moment in which doctors slice into your body without using anesthesia (since they assume you’re dead) and start rapidly harvesting your organs. You feel every bit of it, but you’re trapped inside your body and can’t move or even scream.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-06-22-canada-begins-harvesting-organs-from-euthanized-humans.html

 

Abortion outrage: Mums should be allowed to terminate newborns, say Australian academics

Continuing on with the extermination theme.  It just gets sicker. So… their argument in a nutshell:

“…a mother who is unwilling to care for her child outweighs an infant’s right to life…”

From thedailytelegraph.com.au

KILLING newborn babies should be allowed if the mother wishes, Australian philosophers have argued in a prestigious journal.

Their argument, that it is morally the same as abortion, has forced theBritish Medical Journal to defend its publication of their views.

In an article that has sparked outrage around the world and elicited death threats, Monash and Melbourne University academics argue that a foetus and a newborn both lack a sense of life and aspiration.

They argue this justifies “after-birth abortion” on the proviso it is painless as the baby is not missing out on a life it cannot contemplate.

The doctors of philosophy argue in the BMJ publication Journal of Medical Ethics that one-third of infants with Down syndrome are not diagnosed in the womb, which means mothers of children with severe disabilities should have the chance to end a child’s life after, as well as before, birth.

However, the pair also want the principle of killing newborns extended to healthy babies, because a mother who is unwilling to care for it outweighs an infant’s right to life.

In the article, After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?, the authors argue: “A serious philosophical problem arises when the same conditions that would have justified abortion become known after birth. In such cases, we need to assess facts in order to decide whether the same arguments that apply to killing a human fetus can also be consistently applied to killing a newborn human.”

They also write that the practice should be called “after-birth abortion” and not “infanticide” to “emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a foetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child”.

“We claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk. Accordingly, a second terminological specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘euthanasia’ because the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice, contrary to what happens in the case of euthanasia.”

Although the authors claim that the “moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus, that is, neither can be considered a ‘person’ in a morally relevant sense”, they concede it is hard to exactly determine when a subject starts or ceases to be a “person”.

The editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics, Julian Savulescu, said the articlehad “elicited personally abusive correspondence to the authors, threatening their lives and personal safety”. He said some of comments included:

“These people are evil. Pure evil. That they feel safe in putting their twisted thoughts into words reveals how far we have fallen as a society.”

“Right now I think these two devils in human skin need to be delivered for immediate execution under their code of ‘after birth abortions’ they want to commit murder – that is all it is! MURDER!!!”

“The fact that the Journal of Medical Ethics published this outrageous and immoral piece of work is even scarier”

“Alberto Giubilini looks like a muslim so I have to agree with him that all muslims should have been aborted. If abortion fails, no life at birth – just like he wants.”

He defended the article, saying the arguments in the paper were not new. “The novel contribution of this paper is not an argument in favour of infanticide … but rather their application in consideration of maternal and family interests. The paper also draws attention to the fact that infanticide is practised in the Netherlands.”

He said that “more than ever, proper academic discussion and freedom are under threat from fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.

Originally published as Killing newborns ‘should be allowed’

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/abortion-outrage-mums-should-be-allowed-to-terminate-newborns-say-australian-academics/news-story/05da73dcef423139d0b5003ca8d05346

Children as young as nine are being euthanized in Belgium

“Last year, a member of the euthanasia commission resigned in protest because it refused to recommend prosecution when a woman with dementia who had not requested euthanasia was nevertheless put to death at her family’s request.

Since then, 360 Belgian doctors, academics and others have signed a petition calling for tighter controls on euthanasia for psychiatric patients.”

Opinion writer

August 6

Deliberately taking a small child’s life is unlawful everywhere in the world, even when the child is terminally ill and asks a doctor to end his or her suffering once and for all.

There is an exception to this rule: Belgium. In 2014, that country amended its law on euthanasia, already one of the most permissive in the world, authorizing doctors to terminate the life of a child, at any age, who makes the request.

For a year after the law passed, no one acted on it. Now, however, euthanasia for children in Belgium is no longer just a theoretical possibility.

Between Jan. 1, 2016, and Dec. 31, 2017, Belgian physicians gave lethal injections to three children under 18, according to a July 17 report from the commission that regulates euthanasia in Belgium.

The oldest of the three was 17; in that respect, Belgium was not unique, since the Netherlands permits euthanasia for children over 12.

Everywhere else in the world, the law reflects powerful human intuitions, moral and practical: that it is wrong to abandon hope for a person so early in life, no matter the illness; that it is absurd to grant ultimate medical autonomy to someone too young to vote or legally consent to sex; and that even the best-intentioned fallible human beings should not be entrusted with such life-and-death power.

READ MORE

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/children-are-being-euthanized-in-belgium/2018/08/06/9473bac2-9988-11e8-b60b-1c897f17e185_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bedd957c6b9b

American Medical Association sliding toward support of physician-assisted suicide… here come the death panels

(Natural News) Will the American Medical Association soon be in favor of physician-assisted suicide? In early June, the AMA decided not to reaffirm its position against assisted suicide – a decision which has shocked many. But indeed, the AMA has gone against its own Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, which recommended the AMA maintain its opposition of euthanasia for humans.

Advocates for assisted suicide have been very successful at opening doors for euthanasia in medicine. In some states, affiliate groups have already taken a more neutral stance on this issue, paving the way for legislators to approve the legalization of doctor-assisted suicide. While proponents of euthanasia say that their cause gives patients the right to a dignified death, the issue isn’t really that cut and dry. There are substantial concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion. Inevitably, this could give rise to an untold number of citizens quietly being put to death against their will – while no one will be the wiser.

Experts warn against assisted suicide

Matt Vallière, the Executive Director of Patients Rights Action Fund, told Life News that he, and other advocates for patients’ rights, are very concerned about the AMA’s sudden change of heart.

“The American Medical Association’s decision to not confirm their own Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs’ recommendation – namely that they maintain their opposition to assisted suicide – does not take into account that this bad public policy puts vulnerable patients at high risk for coercion, mistakes and even abuse. Although the AMA’s opposition position still stands for now, a referral back to CEJA is a lost opportunity and a failure to stand against a policy that has grave consequences for everyone, but especially persons living with illness, disabilities, or socio-economic disadvantage. Assisted suicide is not medical care,” Vallière stated.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-17-american-medical-association-sliding-toward-support-of-physician-assisted-suicide-death-panels.html

The De Facto Murder of Alfie Evans

Don’t imagine Kiwis that decisions to end lives are not being taken in NZ. I personally have heard stories of the elderly & what is happening at the end of their lives.  Watch out for the Liverpool Care Pathway. Google that with ‘UK’ and you will see how you could be denied food & water even under this plan of ‘care’. Some without their families’ knowledge. A post is coming on this topic. Watch your loved ones in hospital & be closely involved & informed on their care plan. EnvirowatchRangitikei

Dame Right's avatarDame Right

By: Aedan Sara O’Connor

Proponents of socialized medicine proclaim that we need single payer health care to save the lives of children. They ignore programs like Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), that covers all kids, to purport that there are kids dying under the current health program and push socialized medicine. But how does socialized medicine really treat children? With most cases, children get healthcare, after increased waiting times but every once in a while we see a case that highlights the depravity of a socialist system, when care is rationed and controlled.

Alfie Evans is one of those cases. Alfie Evans was a 23 month old with an undiagnosed supposed neurodegenerative condition. He was expected to die after a year in the British hospital system. His parents disputed that Alfie’s diagnosis was terminal since they were unsure what he had. The British healthcare system refused to continue looking for…

View original post 652 more words

Little Alfie Evans was executed by lethal injection; in a UK hospital steeped in a horrifying history of organ harvesting from human babies

Don’t imagine Kiwis that decisions to end lives are not being taken in NZ. This has been up over two weeks now & only five shares. Proves to me folks are oblivious. I personally have heard stories of the elderly & what is happening at the end of their lives.  Watch out for the Liverpool Care Pathway. Google that with ‘UK’ and you will see how you could be denied food & water even under this plan of ‘care’. Some without their families’ knowledge. A post is coming on this topic. Watch your loved ones in hospital & be closely involved & informed on their care plan. EnvirowatchRangitikei


(Natural News) Watching in horror the “health care” murder of baby Alfie Evans over the last few days, I’ve been gathering an array of stories and sources to bring you a detailed, definitive report of what actually went down. Until that full report is ready, however, it seems urgent to share with you the conclusion of my research: I am convinced that Baby Alfie Evans was executed by lethal injection, and the hospital that murdered him appears to be the center hub of a multi-decade baby organ harvesting crime ring that saw 100,000 baby body parts harvested and illegally held in hospitals all across Britain. (See multiple news sources, below.)

alfie-evans-executed-lethal-injection-organ-trade
Alfie at Alder Hey Hospital UK [Photo:NaturalNews]
It has always been clear that the Alder Hey children’s hospital sought to accelerate the death of Alfie Evans while silencing his parents through a sustained attack consisting of threats and intimidation tactics. Now, Life Site News is report that Alfie Evans was injected with four different drugs by hospital staff just two hours before he died. This, of course, was after several days of being starved to death and denied water. Virtually the entire corporate-controlled media has withheld this information from the public for a variety of nefarious reasons that I will discuss in another post.

Via LifeSiteNews.com:

UK toddler Alfie Evans allegedly died within hours of receiving four different drugs from a nurse at Alder Hey hospital, Italian media is reporting…

[A] nurse entered the child’s cubicle after his father Tom had been called aside and gave him four drugs. A source close to the family told LifeSiteNews that these were injections that were administered to Alfie after Tom had been summoned for an unusual middle-of-the-night meeting with the hospital. The child died two hours later.


Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source! Download here.


Alder Hey hospital doctors had previously conveyed to the Evans’ family in a legal document how they intended to use a drug cocktail that included Midazolam and Fentanyl as part of Alfie’s “end of life care plan.” Side effects of the drugs included respiratory depression. Tom Evans called it an “execution plan” for his son.

Keep in mind that the hospital forced Alfie’s parents to read a so-called “hostage letter” to the press, and they stated that the family would be punished because of the poor attitude of the parents who apparently didn’t go along with the hospital’s plan to murder their baby. As LifeSiteNews reports:

The day prior to Alfie’s death, Tom Evans read to the press outside the hospital what is now being called by many a “hostage letter.” In what appeared to be a forced statement, Tom read out a letter calling all the supporters of Alfie to go home and resume their lives. He thanked the hospital staff for their care of Alfie, even though just hours earlier he had attempted to have them charged with conspiracy to murder his son.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-05-01-alfie-evans-executed-by-lethal-injection-organ-harvesting-alder-hey.html

If you do not want to see euthanasia legalized in NZ – you need to make a submission – date’s been extended (info & template included)

If you do not agree with euthanasia & do not want it legalized in NZ, you can go to the website below & make a submission. For more information on what is entailed with this Bill, read at the website. They’ve done a good comprehensive overview of the pertinent points and included info from other countries that have already enabled euthanasia.

From familyfirst.org.nz

The Select Committee considering David Seymour’s euthanasia bill (whose members interestingly ALL voted for euthanasia in the 1st Reading!) have set the deadline for submissions as soon as 20 February 2018. They seem to be hoping that you’ll be too distracted by the festive and holiday season to get around to making a submission against the bill. Let’s disappoint them!

So we’ve done all the ‘prep work’ for you.

https://www.familyfirst.org.nz/2017/12/euthanasia-its-time-to-make-a-submission-heres-all-the-info-you-need/