Note: observations made by Jo (Red Sky blog) and confirmed by myself … Jo is an author and self employed IT analyst whose aim is “to step into the breach left by what the media isn’t reporting”. EWR
After writing Human 2.0, the Internet of Bodies and Your Body’s the Node I decided to put it to the test and to observe the phenomenon.
Pam Vernon from Rangitikei-Environmental Health Watch (an excellent blog) was there to confirm my findings. We used a Samsung Galaxy Tablet with a Bluetooth BLE scanner.
This is not an experiment as we can’t run baseline tests from before 2021. This is merely an observation. I work in the IT field, I’m a computer technician and CISCO qualified network engineer so I understand computer networks and MAC addresses. I know what I’m seeing. If you think this is nonsense, tell me what these Bluetooth Low Energy emitters are and why they’re moving around?
VIDEO AT THE LINK
That’s WHAT we saw. Now for WHY we saw it.
There is a Transhuman agenda being driven by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum called Human 2.0. Not only will we “own nothing and be happy,” and “eat ze bugs,” but we will all have brain implants. In ten years. Listen to his vision, the clip is just under a minute long. Klaus and his cronies are out of control.
READ AT THE LINK
Photo: screenshot
Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
You just need to start by isolating then adding one person at a time and if a BLE shows up, then ask what devices they may have. I did this at home and found that Bluetooth hearing aids were showing up as N/A. Actually, many things show up as N/A – including my laptop. If I were ‘them’, I’d be using much more advanced tech than Bluetooth. This is just designed to distract the conspiracy theorists. Still, it all needs to be checked. I couldn’t find any detail on the French study,
LikeLike
Hello camthelegend …thank you for your feedback… it actually would be better though for you to address your comment at the source of the article. These were observations only and it would not be pertinent to approach random folk and inquire about their devices. BTW, note, we are not conspiracy theorists.
LikeLike
Hi Pam
I’m not suggesting you approach random people, but most of us have friends, family, colleagues, acquaintances that would be happy to do a 5 min experiment like I just did at home. Also, people have freewill. We can ask people if they will take part in a quick experiment, but better to start with those we know first and work from there.
I think we both know the article was hypothesising that some people have had Bluetooth devices enabled in their body (whether this was stated or not). Hence the link to the French study. If true, I think this would fit the definition [Conspiracy: a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.]. Since we can’t confirm it is true, it becomes are conspiracy theory. I have no issues with conspiracy theories or any other theory as long as they’re understood to be a theory and we can work to determine if there is sufficient evidence to support it. I realise you didn’t write the article and I was not calling you a conspiracy theorist (nor denying it). Some people just avoid the label because of its negative connotation. Like antivaxxxer = bad.
However, it would be good to see some good local evidence come through on this. I’ve done what I can from home in a rural area but I don’t currently have access to anyone else to test with. Surely 100s of other people around the world have tested the hypothesis that people are emitting Bluetooth signals, but I’ve heard very little. I may have a scout around and see what shows up.
What will be the next step from this article having asked the question at the top?
Thanks
Cam
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Cam, thanks for responding again. I just read Jo’s thread at the source & your comprehensive comments explain much. I did also respond there to one of your comments about your awakening & Chronic Fatigue … which is what I was diagnosed with in 2002. I’ll leave you to read that there. Thanks for sharing it too. We’ve been truly conned for years and so many have already suffered, well before the current plandemic.
Re the conspiracy label, I’ve become very cautious (& defensive I’ll admit) about that label knowing its origin. It works so well on folk. We are also very much in the era of being unable to confirm the truth of things given we are so lied to. The V would be a classic example of that.
Some more evidence though, yes, would be good to see. (I did quite a few months back see a couple of guys in a cemetery picking up blue tooth signals, however the way in which they presented it didn’t do them any favours – bit like a clip from a Dracula movie – so not suitable to post).
What will be the next step you ask? I will leave this area of expertise to Jo and share any further info she uncovers going forwards.
Cheers
LikeLiked by 1 person