“Deaths of people who had Covid vaccination ‘no cause for concern’”
says Helen Petousis-Harris …
Listen at the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKuSGbGizC4
We have here NZ’s esteemed *vaccinologist Helen Petousis-Harris who a year ago before the lockdowns told us covid was a souped up flu, then not so long ago that not a single death had occurred post vaccine, and of course with any of those so called ‘rare’ adverse reactions … there is no proof of causality (‘no proof’ being the operative words here). Now we have another brief interview. Here’s a sample of her vague statements:
We must report adverse reactions but not necessarily because the vax causes events… of course we see deaths afterwards … to establish the cause of a reaction/death there are a whole lot of processes that occur … we’re going to see lots and lots of reports … a lot of things are happening by chance … so far this vaccine is looking incredibly safe …. hmmm. Do listen to the entire interview.
So here Petousis-Harris waffles on with nothing much of substance I feel. When asked the very pertinent questions about how concerned the public should be about reporting, or how reassured we can be that the ‘expected’ deaths are being investigated we get terms like ‘a whole lot of processes’ happen. Nothing about numbers, which profession will be investigating, how, what time frame and so on. To date all we seem to hear is that the deceased are buried, with no reassuring reports (that I’ve seen yet) citing facts and figures as to why the death after the vaccine was not caused by it. We are of course expected to just believe it was not. In NZ we are told to look to our ONE source of truth… the government.
What we do hear is the media reporting quite soon after the event (and surely before the possibility of any full investigation) a firm statement that it’s all good and it wasn’t the vaccine. This came soon after two recent NZ deaths that were reported. Where are the full investigations please? Not just a brief statement from the ‘medical professionals involved’. That’s too internal for my liking. We need full independent reports. This really is becoming a case of ‘the king’s new clothes’. Far too many incidents to be written off as coincidence.
NZ will apparently not be releasing full details until July of the reporting as it occurs with the VAERS reports from the US.
And on that note please do visit the @Welcometheeagle88 video channel. He has been examining and analyzing (as best he can) the many thousands of adverse event reports in the US. Quite an eye opener. Remember, less than 1% even report so those already very high figures represent only that proportion of the public. (See our ‘news’ page, right hand column, for graphics indicating deaths & other adverse reactions to date in UK, Europe & the US. Click on those images to take you to the related article).
Note: *The term ‘vaccinologist’ “A nascent field of expertise related to the creation and deployment of vaccines; the field ‘borrows’ from epidemiology, immunology, infectious disease, pediatrics, preventive medicine, public health, virology”
RELATED:
Utah’s Chief Medical Examiner says proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens
The astonishing response by NZ ‘vaccine expert’ Petousis-Harris to her claim that there’s been ‘not a single death’ attributed to the new COVID vaccine
“SARS & MERS were set up to kill a lot more people” said the NZ vaccinologist … was that a Freudian slip?
Note: since google now shadow bans truth on these issues please do share our articles ‘for the greater good’. By independent social media particularly as FB basically now allows nothing of any substance about the casualties. Or share by email. And thank you to all of you who send emails of appreciation. All thankfully received & very much valued. EWR
reallygraceful
![Ways mRNA CV Vaccines Could Harm the Unvaccinated Explored In Depth [LIVESTREAM REPLAY]](https://envirowatchnz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/syringe-3908157_1280.jpg?w=672&h=372&crop=1)
The reports are in that Sue has done an incredible job this morning to represent the interests of New Zealanders standing up to unlawful government behaviour! 
Word is that the judge has been listening. 
She was unaware of the VAERS system and is asking some good questions. She is entertaining the idea that the rollout has been unlawful. Crown law have been arguing that the “limited” wording was used due to the initial rollout to the border workers. It appears that this is their way of justifying the use of the specific section of the Medicines Act. Sue has argued back that if this was the case, and the border workers theoretically work in a scenario with higher risk, then how can this be lawfully extended to the broader public? 
We have just caught snippets during the lunch break and will bring you another update with more information later in the day! 
Join the movement!” 
You must be logged in to post a comment.