An open letter to Jacinda Ardern re: COVID-19

This excellent article was contributed by New Zealand journalist Kiwi4Justice who is clearly concerned & wants the word out. Please do share it far & wide. EWR

NOTE: the article has had over 52K views (47K of those by Kiwis) since posting … & 12K FB shares. It’s pleasing to see so many Kiwis are awake to what is going down.

By Kiwi4Justice

Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister – New Zealand

Dear Jacinda,

I write this letter as a patriotic Kiwi with best intentions for my country and for the future health and welfare of my fellow Kiwis. You have a very difficult job at this moment in time. There can be no doubt about that.

There is a famous saying. “The first casualty of war is the truth”. Well, from what we are seeing around the world, the first casualty of a pandemic is not only the truth, but also rational thinking. That comment is directed at the COVID-19 situation in general rather than at you. In times of crisis, or potential crisis, emotion can be the enemy of truth and rational thinking. Especially fear. There has been a huge amount of emotion and fear flowing across New Zealand and the entire world the last few weeks. This letter attempts to momentarily push the emotion to one side and focus on rational thinking linked to facts and evidence.

Our country as we know it has been ripped apart in the blink of an eye, perhaps never to fully return. The economy and businesses decimated for the foreseeable future. Mental health problems and social problems set to explode with devastating consequences. The damage done is catastrophic. To inflict that onto the nation, there needs to be one heck of a good reason, and one heck of a strong case to do that. There needs to be an extreme level of critical danger in order to inflict this level of damage to try to safeguard the nation. Alongside that, we absolutely must balance that with an understanding that hindsight is always 20-20.

So, the question we need to approach with rational thinking, evidence, and facts is this. Was there/is there a sufficiently extreme level of critical danger facing New Zealand that warrants such damaging measures being taken? Is there a global pandemic of such unprecedented veracity and lethality sweeping across the world that it demands this extreme action for the good of the nation?

When initially informing the nation of the need for a full Level 4 lockdown, the rationale you put forward to the nation was, based on information from the global experts, that if these unprecedented extreme measures were not implemented, then upwards of 80,000 lives would potentially be lost. A terrible number indeed and worthy of the strongest level of consideration.

But let’s now have a look at what are some extremely disturbing pieces of information and perspectives that are emerging around this global catastrophe relating to what those global experts were, and are, saying. The evidence is now very clear from the top down, from our ‘global experts’, that the severity of the COVID-19 virus has been blown out of proportion by an enormous margin (despite what most of the media keeps hammering into us), both in terms of the initial projected mortality rates globally, and in terms of the actual reported numbers of deaths in each country. Alongside that, we have our global media that have whipped up a level of hysteria and fear that has been pumped through our entire DNA on a daily basis 24/7 to the point where COVID-19 has been perceived by the global public as nothing short of a doomsday plague.

The evidence now clearly shows a level of global miscalculation and deception/manipulation of rates of death from COVID-19 that can only be described as medical and political fraud.

COVID-19 began in Wuhan, China, under uncertain circumstances that are still being investigated. As COVID-19 began to spread to other countries, the Imperial College in London produced a piece of work where they used their computer modelling systems to produce some projections for what the global death rates were likely to be from COVID-19. The numbers were alarming to say the least, and the World Health Organisation (WHO) then began informing the world of the situation.

Now a few weeks further on, with the benefit of some hindsight, it is worth looking back at some of those projected numbers that were used to justify an unprecedented global lockdown. US projected deaths 2.2 million (updated projection 50,000 to 60,000), UK projected deaths 500,000 (updated projection 25,000 to 30,000), and New Zealand projected deaths 80,000 (updated projection – perhaps as low as 20).

If Imperial College had provided projections that were even somewhat within the vague ballpark of what we are now seeing, it is fair to say that implementing a catastrophic global lockdown would never have even been considered or accepted. For purposes of comparison, annual death rates from normal flu are 40,000 to 80,000 in the US, 20,000 in the UK, and around 800 in New Zealand.

Were the projections of the Imperial College consistent with what other similar medical science institutes and other scientists were saying? Absolutely not. Did the WHO consider what other institutes and other scientists were saying? It would seem not. Immediately upon the release of the Imperial College projections, Oxford University came back strongly saying that the Imperial College modelling was flawed (their reasoning outlined) and that as such their projected rates of death were significantly over-estimated, by a very large margin. https://www.dailywire.com/news/oxford-epidemiologist-heres-why-that-doomsday-model-is-likely-way-off. This position of Oxford University was backed up by numerous other high level medical experts around the world at the time. Here is a link to a highly informative interview with Dr Shiva, the inventor of e-mail at age 14, a world leader in Bio-Engineering, and now running for US Senate. https://youtu.be/6AHNoLhLPpI

Why did the WHO not take any of these other sources of information into account and instead just went with the doomsday projections of Imperial College with no questions asked? A point to note here. Bill Gates is the second largest funder of the WHO (behind only the United States), and also funds Imperial College.

The counter argument to this of course is that the reason the updated projections of deaths are so much lower now (by orders of magnitude of 20-40 times) is because of the extreme lockdown measures taken. Intuitively, this just doesn’t ring true to anything like that magnitude. Would New Zealand really have had 80,000 deaths if we hadn’t locked down? We also have numerous examples around the world where a lockdown wasn’t implemented, and rates of death were not noticeably higher. Sweden has not locked down at all, and have numbers of death relatively similar to lockdown countries. Nine states in the US did not lock down and their death rates are very small relatively. Australia did not go to Level 4 lock down and has a death rate virtually identical to New Zealand per capita.

The other factor that helped to instil huge hysteria and fear, and to justify a global lock down, was the death rate percentage that the WHO was initially telling the world. The WHO quoted a death rate of 3.4% for those infected with COVID-19. That is a catastrophic death rate (normal flu is 0.1%) and this helped create the doomsday death calculations around the world. It caused hysteria around the world, which was then magnified enormously by a rabid media.

The problem is that this death rate from the WHO was nothing short of fraudulent. It went completely against the standard methodology for calculating the mortality rate of a flu virus whereby you take the number of confirmed deaths and divide that by the estimated number of people who have been infected. Very simple. But that is not at all what the WHO did with COVID-19. They took the number of deaths and divided it only by the number of people who had been tested positive (a very small number). We know that the number of people being tested is only a tiny fraction of those who have actually been infected, by orders of magnitude of probably at least 10. Most likely much higher. As per the Oxford University analysis, they had estimated that probably half of the UK had already been infected earlier this year. This would have changed the COVID-19 mortality rate from the WHO’s doomsday level of 3.4% to something similar to a normal flu at 0.1%. Precisely what we are now seeing around the world, especially in New Zealand.

Perhaps the United States have some valid reasoning in the decision they have just taken to withdraw their annual $450 million funding for the WHO, pending a full investigation.

But if this information is not damning enough, it actually gets considerably worse. We have now seen that the reported number of deaths is hugely less than original projections of Imperial College, and most countries will likely end up with a number of deaths that is similar to normal flu. However, even these relatively moderate levels of reported deaths are seemingly being vastly overstated.

Hospitals around the world have a standard process for how deaths are categorised on their paperwork. To be listed as the flu being the cause of death it must be clear that flu was the primary cause of the person’s death. That is normal hospital process. However, for whatever reason, hospitals around the world have been instructed to deviate from that process with regards COVID-19. Anyone dying from any kind of respiratory issue or any kind of flu like symptoms are required to be categorised as dying from COVID-19, even if they have not even been tested for COVID-19. So, if you had a pre-existing respiratory issue and then died of normal complications of this, you are listed as having died of COVID-19 even if you haven’t even been tested for COVID-19. Here we have the Sir Patrick Vallance, UK Chief Scientific Adviser confirming this fact, as did Dr Deborah Birx who is leading on COVID-19 medical advice for the United States. https://youtu.be/HxKKTB2WBtY. This is medical fraud. It is as simple as that.

As well as this, if a person has at some point tested positive for COVID-19 and then subsequently dies of whatever cause, the hospitals are required to list the official cause of death as COVID-19 no matter what the actual cause of death might have been. For example, if someone was in the final stages of terminal cancer, or had had a massive stroke, but had previously tested positive for COVID-19, then the cause of death must be recorded as COVID-19. Just to make the point here with a crazy example, you could have some one tested positive for COVID-19 with zero symptoms and feeling absolutely fine, who is then run over by a bus. That person has to be listed as dying of COVID-19. We have to ask the very serious question of why this is being done like this? This has caused an enormous skewing of numbers on the rate of deaths from COVID-19. Listen here to the testimony of a Respiratory Therapist whistle blower in the United States as he describes this situation that seems to be consistent in hospitals across the world.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&time_continue=776&v=ZVe3PQ-dHwY

Consequently, in many countries we have seen the weekly death rates from pneumonia and other respiratory illnesses plummet relative to previous years because these types of deaths are now being categorised as COVID-19 deaths instead.

Italy is the country that was held up to the rest of the world as the case for justifying a full lock down. “We have to lock down otherwise we could be the next Italy”. However, it has since been acknowledged that, due to the reasons just outlined above, 99% of people who were reported to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had some other kind of serious illness, and that if standard recording processes had been implemented, the number of COVID-19 deaths in Italy would be approximately 12% of what has officially been reported to the rest of the terrified world. https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/23/italy-only-12-of-covid19-deaths-list-covid19-as-cause/

But even despite what seems to be a serious cooking of the books, the total rates of death in Italy during this COVID-19 period are not particularly unusual. Not something that has been well articulated by the media to try to dial down the level of fear and hysteria!

Now turning to New Zealand. We currently have 14 deaths (mostly very elderly people with serious health issues) and we have fluccuated between 10 to 20 people in hospital at any one time. This is after hospitals across the country moved heaven and earth to shift existing patients out and cancel thousands of upcoming appointments to prepare for the coming COVID-19 tsunami. A tsunami which never arrived. Barely even a gentle ripple in fact. This is not to say COVID-19 is not to be taken very seriously in New Zealand. It absolutely must. But the responses need to be proportional, and they need to be based on information that is as trustworthy and factual as possible in terms of severity and where/who is at the greatest risk. Protect and support those most at risk.

At the time of writing, we have approximately 1,500 positive tests for COVID-19 in New Zealand. Let’s take a fairly conservative estimate that 1 in 10 people who have been infected are being tested, bearing in mind that a large number of people who get infected are either asymptomatic (no symptoms) or very mild symptoms (Oxford University estimated half of the UK has been infected earlier this year). The conservative ratio of 1 in 10 would make the mortality rate in New Zealand 0.09% against a normal flu mortality rate of 0.1%. That is a conservative estimate. It is quite likely considerably lower than that.

Here is a twitter link to a Fox News journalist in the US being overheard on open microphone just prior to a press conference with President Trump, admitting that even in the much harder hit United States, studies on COVID-19 are showing mortality rates of 0.1%, the same as normal flu. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/hoax-fox-news-john-roberts-caught-hot-mic-discussing-covid-19-mortality-rate-technician-like-flu-video/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

So, we now know from the information and data in front of us, in our own country, what the severity level of COVID-19 is in New Zealand. This is real information that we have right now. Not the fraudulent death rates given to us by the WHO. There certainly is nothing even approaching an extreme level of critical danger that I mentioned at the beginning of this letter in order to justify a devastating lockdown. Mortality rates of a normal flu, at the very worst, but important to protect and support the elderly and the health vulnerable who are most at risk.

So if we now know this, why is New Zealand not fully open and operational right now? Every single day that New Zealand is in full or partial lockdown is utterly devastating for our country. We initially were put into this lockdown position through a quite mind-blowing level of negligence, fraud, deceit, or whatever you want to call it, from the global ‘experts’, for whatever reasons. That situation requires the highest level of investigation, as the United States have already indicated. Right now, all we can do in New Zealand is to take the information we now have, use some calm and rational thinking, and do what needs to be done.

We need to get the country back to work in trying to rebuild and reclaim our nation from the devastation that has sadly been caused. We also need to be very aware of the circumstances that led to this catastrophic situation so that lessons can be learned to prevent similar situations in the future. We need to get New Zealand going again, right now!

To finish with, I will switch back from rational thinking to emotion. Emotion does have a very necessary role with this situation. You, the NZ government, the medical establishment, and the entire country should be extremely angry about what has happened to our country. It has been utterly devastated, seemingly for no justifiable reason other than a fraudulent level of misinformation, deceit, exaggeration, and hysteria from our so called global experts.

Extremely serious questions need to be asked, investigations launched, and people and organisations held to account.

Yours sincerely,

Kiwi Patriot


Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 thoughts on “An open letter to Jacinda Ardern re: COVID-19”

  1. Some of the comments in this article, which is a very good rendition of the situation right now, I already expressed in various other comments. It seems to me that people are not listening to all I am saying. WAKE UP you lot!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Great letter, similar in tone to one I was preparing for every authority I can think of – Now, I can just use yours, with attribution, of course.

    For those of us with an understanding of the sciences, which you obviously do, you may want to add this to your arsenal –
    Dr. Andrew Kaufman does an excellent job explaining how all the published literature surrounding SARS/Vauxvid is flawed.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks 7thpillar. I did see Dr Kaufman’s name in my trawling but haven’t watched as yet. Will take a look soon as I can. and the article is not mine, I will add that in a sec. Was written by a NZ contributor who isn’t after glory just wants the word spread. I’m sure he’d be pleased for you to spread it where it’s needed. 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

  3. love it Pam
    Hope our beloved and deeply revered leaders read this and act on it
    Nothing here that the well-informed amongst us didn’t intuit from early days. If all our beloved leaders had another half a brain between them, it’d be lonely

    Liked by 1 person

    1. is that abusive?
      my country has been junked by banksters, not for the first time.
      They have stripped us of the fruits of our grandfathers’ hard and intelligent work, and our politicians have aided and abetted them in this, for half a century without a single objection. Move over pollies. Move over, council CEOs. Go and get an honest job. Let someone run the country who cares about it.

      Liked by 3 people

        1. Wasnt this to put fear into people to take the vaccine set up by bill gates to depopulate the world people will take the vaccine to stop c virus a family said there dad died of a heart attack but they put corona virus on his death cert thats evil

          Liked by 1 person

        2. Hi Lionel …yes Docs have been given orders to write CV on the death certificates. It appears very dodgy the whole thing. And agree will likely be a part of the agenda… the vax.

          Like

  4. Thank you, Pam.
    The latest from Celeste Solum is the COVID spider of the World Economic Forum Strategic Intelligence has now been expanded to 250 levels from the original 200. Celeste points out all countries, incl PMs, are run by the U.N. Ardern is truly a puppet as are the rest of them in the Beehive.
    This in from aminutetomidnite https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf0R2hbQ8g4&feature=em-uploademail and this was followed up by heads up about the vaccine being pushed now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2i0G3K9yTs&feature=em-uploademail
    Great if you could warn everyone about the contents of the vaccine/s. DARPA’s contribution very concerning as it crosses into transhumanism which explains why no “human” babies post 2030.
    Thank you so much for everything you are doing.
    Hug and Love.
    Helena

    Like

    1. Thanks Helena… important info. Actually there is a series starting today on vaccines too, must try & post tomorrow. Will post your info too … and you’re welcome Helena, appreciate your encouragement … hugs & love to you too ❤ Pam

      Like

  5. The question that should be on everyone’s lips right about now is, why? Why would the entire global ruling clique go to such extremes of deliberate deception and promote such devastating measures in response to a crisis they KNEW wasn’t as bad as they were saying it was? What could their motive be? Are our governments simply incompetent or should we be looking at them with a much more suspicious eye? The speed with which they took these decisions may appear to some as good leadership in the face of uncertainty, but how much uncertainty can one claim to have been when right from the outset they were already determined to listen ONLY to this group and act according to recommendations by only hat group despite a whole range of alternative expert opinion being available to them? Does that sound like good leadership to you? Taking the most extreme advice and implementing the most damaging response? To me, that sounds like neither incompetent or simply bad leadership…It sounds like something else; criminal leadership! This thing looks, walks, and quacks like a goddamn carrion-eating vulture pretending to be a duck!” It reeks to high heaven of being both calculated and deliberate…The global economy just underwent controlled-demolition folks, and its collapse was about as natural as that of WTC-7…..Ordo Ab Chao!…. The virus was the pledge; the beginning of the illusionist’s trick…we are currently in “the turn” and by design, we are looking the wrong way….What will “the prestige” turn out to be? Whatever abomination rises out of the dust cloud…

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Bill Gates…..far too much influence. Agenda is mass mandatory vaccination and chipping. I invite you to do the research.

      Like

  6. Hi Pam,

    Thanks for getting this information out there in very professional manner.

    Here are three other videos well worth the watch; one suggesting social distancing is needed to be 2 metres, because the micro chip reporting satellites need just a little less space between peoples to be able to monitor all those micro chipped.

    The biggest imminent danger is forced mass vaccination, with Bill Gates poisons. Three extra ‘must see’ videos are:

    https://www.brighteon.com/47915e05-2e93-45d1-a452-795647f0638d

    David W Phillips
    Pokeno , NZ

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks David for your feedback. Always appreciated. And also for the links. I will save & watch. Definitely agree re the distancing. How cleverly they’ve constructed it all. And yes the vaccines. The huge issue from self proclaimed ‘expert’ (not) Billy Gates.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Isn’t hindsight a wonderful thing. I disagree with this letter for a few reasons. You are writing as if the pandemic is over which it is not. Many healthcare workers have been victims of this virus and are not from the seasonal flu. We will never know what the mortality rate would have been if this virus had been left to spread with less stringent controls.

    Like

    1. Can you explain then Emma, any suggestions, as to why MDs are speaking out against the diagnoses of CV they are being told to make regardless? Some just won’t do it. Inflating numbers are they? There are too many anomalies going down with this one I’m afraid.

      Liked by 3 people

    2. We will never know the mortality rate period Emma… given the MDs are being INSTRUCTED to list all deaths as CV. Looks like deliberate inflation to me. Some docs with a conscience won’t comply & many are speaking up loudly about it. Too many anomalies for my liking. OK do the precautionary principle (I am) but there are too many lies going down.

      Liked by 3 people

    3. Emma many ..including many businessmen were banging at the door of the PM to close the border weeks before she decided to do so…and then she admitted that closing the border was on the advice she took from a friend in London.
      And then it was the same group of businessmen who took it upon themselves to arrange 7 plane loads of PPE to bring to NZ.
      God knows what the bulk of Arderns /Peters mps actually do….organising a pis. up in a brewery rings a bell.

      Like

    4. Doctors around the world are now getting the real life data and evidence from their work and considetable analysis over the past several months.

      That is showing consistently around the world a death rate of around 0.1%. The same as normal flu.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. What everyone in the world is missing is the irresistible urge of Politicians and bureaucrats to use any thing possible to be able to control populations and make George Orwell’s predictions come true.
    There is no bigger contrast than the Governor of Florida, the state with the largest % age group vulnerable to the virus anywhere in the world, instructing his citizens NOT to go into lock down, opening up Golf Courses and beaches for them to use under common sense guidelines and now having some of the best stats in the world and moving onto the next step of opening up the economy of the whole State.
    In NZ and Australia all our Governments have proved is that most of their citizens are now two legged sheep!
    Now that the Bureaucrats know that I will make a prediction – re the infringement on individual liberty you aint seen nuthin yet!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Tell me why then are the countries who moved last like the States, why do they have the highest death rates. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. That is to date anyway I must say. We have had a real small death rate compared to the rest of the world. It’s not bloody rocket science. You knockers will live to regret your statements. The action Jacinda has taken is correct!!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Well yes Ted, if we could have confidence in the testing regime & the accuracy of what is stated on death certificates. That for me just does not sit right & to me says we will never know the true state of things.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. The death rate in the US seems to be similar to most places around the world, including NZ.
        Approximately 0.1%, which is the same as normal flu. However, as more and more doctors in the US are now telling us, it is probably a lot lower than that in reality, because the numbers of recorded COVID-19 deaths have been artificially inflated by hospitals having to include a large number of other deaths incorrectly recorded as COVID-19

        Liked by 1 person

      3. As Del Bigtree says it’s a bit like the tiger story. The guy says to his friend, “Why have you got that horn?” His friend says, “I blow it to keep the tigers away”. “But there are no tigers!” “See, I told you, it works”.

        Liked by 1 person

  9. Thank you Peter – this is perfect – I no longer feel like the boy pointing out the Emperor has no clothes – I will share far and wide – hopefully more people will wake up and ask questions as to why thus happened, Thanks again.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. I’m proud of Jacinda for the heart-full and decisive way she took action to take care of us all through this ordeal.
    She responded appropriately and effectively to the information she was given.
    There is no easy way back from this lockdown. It needs to be the gradual ‘coming out’ Jacinda has planned for us. But I trust that she is big enough to change tact in alignment with the new information coming in so there will be no question of sending us back into lockdown when this virus comes back to go through it’s natural curve and our herd immunity sends it into oblivion like all annual flu bugs before it.
    It’ll be quite a journey back (and of course we must protect our elderly and those at risk) but together, with a lot a care and Kiwi spirit . . .
    we GOT this!

    Ps: WordPress won’t let me add a link but if you want the latest real figures please google “Dr. Erickson COVID-19 Briefing”

    Like

    1. Yes Jacinda is doing what she’s told … a true globalist Jaguar. Did you notice that early on in January NZ’s esteemed vaccinologist was telling her this was just a souped up flu? Oh and now the Docs are being told to list death by CV regardless. Something is not right in Denmark as the saying goes.

      Liked by 4 people

    2. If Ardern has a plan to come out of this she hasnt shared it with the general public, could you share with us what you understand her plan to be

      Liked by 1 person

  11. This woman is NOT ONE OF US – she is engaged by the UN and coached by H Clark – – an evil mix / this epidemic (????) has been weaponized against us (the people) to control and change multiple legislative laws to suit an agenda – which is against the people / selected advises to suit the cause and give support to UN mandate – time for TRUTH to expose them! .

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Awesome to actually read something sensible and informative. I am so sick of all the rubbish press coverage that distorts everything we read and see. I have thought from the beginning that something was terribly wrong with all of this and have been surprised by even some of my nearest friends who haven’t even questioned. I will share – no doubt upset some people but maybe open some eyes too. Baa baa……

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks Caroline … an awake person obviously. Yes I too am surprised at those nearest at times. It’s called cognitive dissonance. People have been indoctrinated by years of untrue mainstream media. As someone else has pointed out today in comments, this whole thing will have confirmed how compliant & unquestioning the general populace is. Our own Barry Smith (see NWO pages) said NZ was chosen as ‘their’ new world order test case because our motto is ‘she’ll be right’.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Peter … Yes! This is the thing about it. Yet their death certificates cite CV as cause of death. Why can’t folk see through that you’d have to ask. Pretty blatant inflation of stats & outright LYING.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. From now on, I want Jobinda ,and our Ministry of Health leader to also advise the public of NZ the latest unemployment numbers, and also the latest suiside numbers along side their updated virus numbers at their daily live propaganda TV link up.

          Liked by 3 people

      1. Hi Pam, how do can we get NZ’ers to wake up to this none sense? I’ve shared on my page but I want to do something more active to provoke people to think and question what’s happening before we end up too far down the path of no recovery

        Liked by 2 people

        1. Personally Alexsandra, I think repetition & perseverance … I’ve seen folk often enough eventually join the dots 🙂 Folk just take a while to get it. (Cognitive dissonance). Eventually the establishment lies once too often & they get it. Just keep exposing their lies. It’s easy enough to find the evidence. (Getting a little harder with all the censorship now but still possible). Good luck!

          Liked by 1 person

  13. OK relick … the person who doesn’t have the balls to add his name … presumably you are male. I’ve taken note of your cowardly comment … being hunted down sounds like a threat to me. You merely illustrate to folk with more than two brain cells, unlike yourself, that the article is bang on the nail. Do have a good day relick.

    Like

  14. Well now that’s five minutes of my life I’ll never get back.

    I heard that COVID19 can be fixed with disinfectant. Wanna buy a bottle? 😂😂😂

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Pam, I’m from the U.K. and wondered why you are misrepresenting the U.K. It’s acknowledged by the government here that the daily death statistics you refer to is only those tested in hospital and do not include community deaths. Office of National Statistics (ONS) who collate statistics say death certificates which takes weeks to come through show where COVID19 is written on the certificate is 40% higher than government (this is going back three weeks) although it’s believed that trend will continue. Additionally the ONS look at deaths against the 5 year average deaths. What they are finding is that total additional deaths are over 100% higher than the COVID19 deaths. The additional deaths are 41k vs the 17K relating to COVID19. The certificates with these deaths include substantial amounts of ‘community acquired pneumonia’ which is not included in the COVID19 numbers in hospital stats or the ONS COVID19 released stats. There are other dubious categories which could also be COVID19 related but no tests were made and therefore no confirmation other than these deaths have spiked substantially more (In some cases over 100%) than the five year average for that type of death.

    The same goes for other countries within the EU where all are following the same pattern of exceptional additional deaths beyond the 5 year average.

    I understand The famed Imperial model (now independently peer reviewed & also checked by independent math modellers – Microsoft has done their own check) and all have so far concluded it appears to take the correctly known assumptions and mathematical calculations. With the latest data it’s original forecasts will be updated over the next couple of weeks and the results will be released, after careful analysis sometime after that.

    It is therefore too early to suggest the modelling was wrong, but I respectfully suggest using U.K. And EU hospital only death to help back up your hypothesis only adds to the incorrect information that you so want to avoid.

    Regards
    Brian

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Hi there. I just want to say thank you. This letter was music to my ears!!!!
    Over these past few weeks of being in lockdown, i hve been able to research and discover many of the insights you hve identified.
    in my opinion the WHO has alot to answer for, along with Dr Fauci, Dr Birx and Bill Gates. Deep state.
    All with globalist agendas.
    And the MAINSTREAM MEDIA!!

    Liked by 2 people

  17. The link below shows an extremely informative discussion and analysis by two of the lead doctors on the COVID-19 frontline in California who called a press conference to help get this information out there.

    Sensible, measured thoughts and analysis from experts in field who are at the coal face, based on the real life evidence and information that they and other doctors from around the world now have available.

    We have to ask ourselves, why are more of the media not showing this kind of information and analysis from the people who absolutely know best? And shouldn’t national leaders around the world now be using this kind of information to help frame their policy decisions around?

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_title&v=xfLVxx_lBLU

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I am writing from New Zealand Aotearoa. This is probably the most articulate and transparent – and informed briefing I have heard yet regarding COVID19. Thank you. I believe everyone, everywhere needs to hear this, but most particularly government leaders.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. This is an excellent letter and makes the case very well. I am asking you to consider revising your reference to Dr Shiva as the inventor of email. This debated point is likely to cause some people we are trying to wake up to refuse to seriously consider the points being made. I think most of us have personal experience with numerous people who seize on any potential inaccuracy to throw the whole thing out.

    I always considered Ray Tomlinson the inventor several years before Shiva. This article (and few comments) sum it up decently: https://fossbytes.com/who-invented-email-ray-tomlinson-or-shiva-ayyadurai-know-the-truth/
    A comment also makes some good points about Compuserve (I remember that service, I lived in the U.S. then). Shiva was serve himself much better by claiming he was an early email pioneer which no one could refute.

    Thank you for considering.

    Cheers.

    Liked by 2 people

      1. Lots of inaccuracies in this letter. So we have had great success and the writer is basically saying its a sham? Please contact friends and relations in other countries as I have. They all wish they were in NZ right now. Sweden is now reaping a much higher death toll and Australia is pretty much in lockdown. Cousins in England are wondering when they will ever get out of lockdown as the death toll reaches nearly a 1000 per day. Be grateful we are being well looked after and now things are beginning to life in terms of levels.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. You like others are entitled to your opinion Catherine. And it really depends what your world view is how you look at this issue. I am looking at the very large picture which folk conveniently dismiss as ‘conspiracy’. You can read about those at the new world order and the agenda 21/30 pages). There are other agendas going down. If folk prefer not to look at those it’s their prerogative. I’ve been exposing those agendas for some time now & if you’re new to the info then yes you will be looking solely at the story mainstream is feeding us.

          Liked by 3 people

        2. Glad I am in NZ. We done the right thing, everyone was floundering around, in cases like this you follow the old adage, Plan for the worst, hope for the best. If everything had gone haywire, who would be blaming who?

          Liked by 1 person

        3. Carolyn,

          You may find these two articles interesting for a small start. The first one is by Dr. Fauci himself. There is growing belief among standard credentialed medical doctors and qualified professionals that the ultimate mortality will end up being about 0.1%.

          If you can hold that thought for a moment, the implication of the strangely similar controls measures being put in place in so many places start to become clear. It is not about our health. The deaths from suicide, lack of treatment for other illnesses and the socio-economic impacts are likely to dwarf the death toll from this if they have not already.

          https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387

          https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT4I4Ls6RAsDqSaKBVIdLPIKFNs7tbWWzZ3eP1NrNltiiZqmUHK-rPDLxeN2qvt0es1S-v6jP29S_T1/pub

          Best wishes for a healthy life where we as men and women are free to realise our potential.

          Liked by 1 person

        4. Are those 1,000 deaths a day in the UK all actually caused by COVID-19? We now know from the medical officials themselves that they absolutely are not. In Italy it is now estimated only 12% of the deaths originally listed as COVID-19 deaths should have have been listed as such.

          In the UK you will find that the recorded weekly death rates of pneumonia and other respiratory illnesses will have plummeted relative to previous years because those deaths are now being recorded as COVID-19 deaths instead. That is medical fraud. Not blaming the doctors for that. They are just doing what they are told to do, and many of them coming forward to complain about it.

          So we have to ask why certain elements would want to inflate the numbers like that?
          It’s a disconcerting situation

          Liked by 2 people

  19. I like this Letter and I’m on your side, but there is a hole in one stat that needs addressing. The predicted USA death rate appears to 100K -240K not 2.2M? Can you please show me the source of that info?

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Interesting reference to the Imperial College “model”. Do people realize that the same Professor and “model” made wildly inaccurate estimates of deaths from SARS, Mad Cow Disease in the UK and had a significant impact on Britain’s agricultural scene wrongly predicting what a foot and mouth disease outbreak would do and caused authorities to slaughter 1000s of animals unnecessarily?

    So why do WHO and Governments continue to rely only on this one “model”?

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply