Tag Archives: Te_Whatu_Ora

Covid-19 experimental injection, News

Health New Zealand is at it again! Scrubbing the evidence?

Leave a comment

From Steve Kirsch @ Substack

Health New Zealand is at it again! They are trying to get my site taken down. Not going to happen

Here are the emails I sent to the Australian attorneys hired by HNZ and the NZ ERA . Bottom line: Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea. Never. I will not comply.

Maybe they should change their tagline to “Hiding public health records from the public since 2022.”

Executive summary

Trying to hide public health info from the public is never a good idea, especially when you are killing the public with a vaccine you are pushing.

Health New Zealand can’t explain how their data is consistent with a safe vaccine (it isn’t).

So they are trying to con my hosting provider into taking down my site. Shame on them! Censoring truth is never a good plan and those participating in such an effort should be ashamed of themselves.

Why can’t we have a public discussion on what the data says instead of trying to censor the truth?

Here are two emails I just sent out. Enjoy.

My email to Clyde & Co, the Australia law firm sending emails to my hosting provider to have my site deleted

From: Steve Kirsch
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 10:13 PM
To: Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa
Subject: URGENT – Deletion request
Importance: High

Hi Anthony,

What a pleasure to meet you!

If you want me to remove PHI, I would be happy to do so.

Why didn’t you just ask me nicely? Doing an end-run directly to my hosting provider doesn’t sound like you are dealing in good faith.

I’m sure you want to save lives just like I do, but pulling a stunt like this is NOT HELPFUL to building a great relationship with me.

As you know, you have no jurisdiction over me or my hosting provider. So pissing me off is simply NOT a good idea. It doesn’t serve your client well to do that.

You’ll have as much luck COMPELLING me to remove the data as the DOJ had with the NY Times and the Pentagon Papers. You should study that decision. It didn’t end well for the DOJ. Here’s a link.

I’ve told Margie Apa that I’d be happy to remove any MRN which discloses PHI.

I also shared my offer to her publicly.

She ignored my request. I don’t get it.

If you want to mitigate damages, ignoring my request is stupid.

I suggest you tell them to IMMEDIATELY supply a list of offending MRNs and the NHI number which matches. Will you do that for me?

As far as I know, all the records I published are fully obfuscated so that it is impossible, even for me, to discover the PHI of any person or match the MRN with an NHI.

The records I published do not match the records of any person living or dead. Not a single one. Am I mistaken?

If Health New Zealand disagrees, kindly provide the MRN and the matching NHI identifier.

If you cannot do this, then what’s the issue?

I don’t want to harm anyone, and I’m happy to VOLUNTARILY redact any offending records, but you have provided NO EVIDENCE OF HARM.

I request that you IMMEDIATELY provide a list of offending MRNs and the associated NHI so that damages can be mitigated.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.  I’m in California and you can call up to 10pm PST.

Finally, 2 months ago, I published an article “An offer you can’t refuse.”

Health New Zealand took NO ACTION on my request.

If they publish the FULL data, I’m happy to remove my data as it will no longer be needed. Why did they ignore that? That’s another way to solve the problem.

I look forward to hearing from you.

-steve

P. S. Barry Young is a hero. These records prove that Health New Zealand has been KILLING people with these vaccines. Maybe you should ask them to look at the data that was leaked? I requested a meeting with their epidemiologists to explain to me why, if the vaccine is safe, the mortality curves between vaxxed and background diverge. THEY REFUSED TO DO THAT. Why would they do that unless they are HIDING SOMETHING: like the fact that the vaccines are the cause of the excess deaths of THOUSANDS of people in New Zealand. Why can’t we talk about it? I’d be happy to invite YALE PROFESSOR HARVEY RISCH to the meeting; he is one of the TOP EPIDEMIOLOGISTS in the world. WHY CAN’T WE TALK ABOUT IT?

My email to the New Zealand Employment Relations Authority

To: christchurchera@era.govt.nz
Cc: Berkahn, Richard; Patey, Lachlan ; Andrew Slater; Margie Apa; Cooke, Anthony <Anthony.Cooke@clydeco.com>
Subject: [2023] NZERA 718 3266200 Health New Zealand will not comply with my request to mitigate damages. They should be ordered to supply offending MRNs
Importance: High

Barry Young disclosed the information to me. I am a US journalist and published the obfuscated records on the Internet.

I told the chief executive of Health New Zealand I’d be happy to VOLUNTARILY remove any record which “would likely have significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their whanau.”

They have refused to comply with my request.

I request the ERA order them to supply me with the offending records (using the MRN record identifier) and explain how it is possible for the record to be matched to any person, dead or alive, in a way that harms that person.

All the records were obfuscated using a ONE WAY randomization algorithm so that the data for a given person cannot be identified. Therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for any person to identify someone else’s record.

So a breach of PHI is IMPOSSIBLE. No one has contacted me to remove their record because nobody can find their record because it is unfindable.

They need to provide proof to the ERA that there is at least one of the 4M records published on my S3 site that could reveal PHI or could have SIGNIFICANT or IRREPARABLE consequences.

Where is that proof?

They CANNOT meet that burden.

I said I would remove any such record from my website voluntarily.

They REFUSED to identify the MRN(s) of any such records!!!

They should be ordered by the ERA to identify the MRNs of these records IMMEDIATELY to mitigate damages.

If they fail to do that, they should be held accountable for any such harm that their inaction has caused.

I can be reached at <redacted> and would be DELIGHTED to have a RECORDED discussion on this matter if you have any questions.

They refuse to engage in dialog to settle this matter.

I have NO desire to harm people, but they refuse to provide any evidence of harm.

Where is the list of MRNs to be removed and the description of the irreparable harm for each of the records requested?

They will not provide this voluntarily. THEY SHOULD BE ORDERED TO PRODUCE THIS LIST IMMEDIATELY SO THAT ANY DAMAGES CAN BE MITIGATED.

Steve Kirsch
US journalist

Summary

Health New Zealand is trying to enforce an order which was obtained under false pretenses claiming that there are “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families” through the publication of the obfuscated records.

This is blatantly false.

They cannot identify a single record in the data that I publicly released that can cause “significant and irreparable adverse consequences for individuals and their families.” Not a single one.

When I asked them to identify the MRN of any offending record so that I can voluntarily remove it, they refused to respond to my request.

What they want is to have the entire database taken down to cover their crime.

They’ve been killing people and they are unable to explain their own data.

Even top New Zealand experts can’t explain away the New Zealand data leaked by Barry Young. Epic fail every time. It’s ludicrous. For example, Janine Paynter got so pissed that I wasn’t falling for her bullshit handwaving arguments that she blocked me. Way to resolve conflict Janine! Maybe try data next time instead of nonsensical bullshit arguments?

Health New Zealand wants the public health data censored so the public won’t have the evidence to convict them of negligent homicide. It’s as simple as that.

Sorry, but I’m not going to be a party to the cover up of the crime scene.

Please share this post widely, especially if you live in New Zealand.

SOURCE

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/health-new-zealand-is-at-it-again

RELATED:

My generous offer sent to Health New Zealand today… you’re going to love it!

$25,000 reward for the first person to show that I’ve leaked any PHI

Covid-19 experimental injection, Medical Industry

The destruction of informed consent in NZ (The work of evil is often piecemeal, steady, methodical)

Leave a comment

From NewZealandDoc @ Substack

A Quiet Evil: The Destruction of Informed Consent

It is tempting to think of evil in apocalyptic imagery: vast and sudden demolition, a searing propulsive darkness or a blinding conflagration, the work of engineered catastrophic mayhem, in whose wake is utter smouldering demise. Yet the work of evil is often piecemeal, steady, methodical, and the accomplishment of a great wrong may well be the result of the gradual accumulative weight of small decisions, whose progress is all the surer for its studied implacability. I think of a large battalion of infantry moving painstakingly across a terrain and claiming it inch by inch until they have vanquished all. Yet, in truth, evil is varied, its manifestations as many as there are living human entities who, faced with seemingly slight or casual choices, often land on the side of self-interest, self-aggrandizement and deception. And evil, however disguised, appears in language.

NewZealandDoc’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

You will forgive me this preface as I alight on a matter that demonstrates with simple clarity a facet of the evil that has been visited upon us during the Corona War by an institution purporting to have as its charge the protection of the public weal in its regulation of medical practitioners: the infamous Medical Council of New Zealand.

On 5 December 2019, while in the employ as a psychiatrist of one of New Zealand’s District Health Boards (since amalgamated into an overarching bureaucratic entity now known as Te Whatu Ora), I received an email communication about informed consent. The document can be perused in its entirety here:

Mcnz Informed Consent

61.4KB ∙ PDF file

Download

The “Updated statement on informed consent,” signed by Chief Executive Officer Joan Simeon –now, coincidentally enough, the Chair of the Federation of State Medical Board’s international arm, the International Association of Medical Regulatory Agencies – states the following:

“The key points about informed consent are:

•Every time treatment is provided, a doctor must have permission to provide that treatment. The process of obtaining that permission is called ‘informed consent’. Without informed consent, the treatment may be unlawful. To help the patient decide whether they want a treatment, they first need to be given information, such as the risks and benefits of their treatment options.

•Obtaining consent is a process of shared decision-making where a doctor helps the patient understand their medical condition and the options for treating (or not treating) that condition. It is more than signing forms and completing paperwork. As a doctor, you need to take the time to ask questions so that you understand what matters to your patient, and what their concerns, wishes, goals and values are.”

Bear in mind that this statement, meant to be a standard of good medical practice and to be used as a measure of professional conduct, appeared just as covid had been unleashed upon the world.

Then, on 28 April 2021, this very same Medical Council, in conjunction with the Dental Council, issued a guidance statement on professional responsibility and the Covid-19 vaccine (so-called), which can be found here. It was withdrawn without fanfare on 13 September 2023. It is a masterpiece of obfuscation and an inversion of true informed consent. As such, it represents one of those unheralded but highly effective acts of evil.

Guidance Statement Covid 19 Vaccine And Your Professional Responsibility

142KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Not only are health practitioners themselves expected to get the jab, but the regulators write that “it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of antivaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners,” while simultaneously advising that “As a health practitioner, you have a role in providing evidence-based advice and information about the COVID-19 vaccination to others. You should be prepared to discuss evidence-based information about vaccination and its benefits to assist informed decision making.”

Yet when one of my colleagues undertook to provide advice to a pregnant woman about medical issues connected with the use of the Pfizer inoculation, his licence was suspended. Furthermore, given the provisional approval of the inoculation at the time and the absence of long-term safety data, the much-vaunted informed consent process and the collaborative partnership with patients implied necessitated a frank discussion of serious risk – risk that has, sadly enough, been borne out not only in New Zealand but world-wide, with an extraordinary panoply of adverse events, including death, amounting to a genocide.

With every day each of us is confronted by choice, on matters small or large. However mauled we may or may not be by spike proteins, jabs, hippocampal lesions, or the weight of the massive psychological operation played against us with covid, we retain the freedom to choose. During the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany – in an era far before viral or vaccine-mediated bioweapons were in play – ordinary people made choices, bureaucrats made choices, neighbors made choices, and a tremendous evil was allowed to grow to a horrific immensity.

Undermining a real, a true, a genuine foundational principle of Medicine – informed consent – in the service of … of following an agenda that has oppressed and is still oppressing us and destroying viable and decent Medicine in the process, is but another one of those examples of how evil wins its way in our world. The Medical Council of New Zealand, ostensible protector of public health, has in its serpentine and devious manner, shown us that it is as destructive as it is hypocritical, and as corrupt as it is authoritarian.

And those many doctors out there who knew then and now know even better about their profession need to come out of hiding, no matter how uneasy or fearful of the “authorities” they may feel.

Unless they do so a medical profession worth keeping won’t be left.

Emanuel E. Garcia, M.D.

January 2025

SOURCE

https://newzealanddoc.substack.com/p/a-quiet-evil-the-destruction-of-informed?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1144743&post_id=140796745&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3zn&utm_medium=email

Check out our sister site truthwatchnz.is for other news

Image by Lucas L from Pixabay

Covid-19 experimental injection

Unprecedented Carnage Revealed in Te Whatu Ora’s Damaging Data Leak

Leave a comment

From nzdsos.com

Many eyes are on New Zealand as the damaging whistle blower data reveals the unprecedented carnage from the vaccine rollout and, while the authorities are more concerned with a possible privacy breach, it is clear they are in significant damage control behind the scenes as the data adds to the evidence of a likely global crime against humanity.

Dr Matt Shelton talks with anaesthetist Dr Paul Oosterhuis at Parliament, Sunday 17th December 2023, in support of whistle blower Barry Young and the leaked Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora vaccination data which exposes the obvious safety and temporal links to the increase in sudden and unexplained deaths.

READ AT THE LINK

Unprecedented Carnage Revealed in Te Whatu Ora’s Damaging Data Leak

Image by elbgau from Pixabay