Tag Archives: medical treatment

Now repealed, the amended Covid-19 Public Health Response Bill basically nullified many aspects of NZ’s Bill of Rights

Note: I withdrew an earlier post on this topic, as Martin Harris from Uncensored kindly corrected me on the fact that the Bill had been repealed. However, I am reposting the item in revised form for the following reasons

At the time this amendment passed in Parliament there was great consternation (and understandably) about our impending loss of freedoms. Although, as pointed out, it has now been repealed, I do not see this as now history.

A few months back we posted an article on bomb scares in NZ schools, several in fact, that alluded to the powers of the Department of Education in such an event & I quote:

If a disease is classified as notifiable, this means health practitioners and laboratories are required to notify Medical Officers of Health of cases of a notifiable disease.

Medical Officers of Health then have powers to manage the disease on a case-by-case basis, including the ability to:

  • formally initiate contact tracing of contacts of cases of coronavirus
  • issue mandatory directions such as restricting movement and travel
  • apply for court orders such as for treatment
  • issue administrative 72-hour detention orders (urgent public health orders).

If you read the article you will see that indeed parents were separated from their children, one parent marched off school grounds by law enforcement.

Another item of interest that floats on the periphery is that of advertisements seen in May/June this year by NZSIS for surveillance officers and more recently in November, for contact tracers.

In light of the above plus other developments at G20 around the introduction of vaccine passports, I consider it pertinent to be very watchful.

Below is the original piece posted earlier, including Martin Harris’s information on the repeal of the amendment:


The COVID-19 Public Health Response Bill (read it and check for yourself) gives the Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern the power to decide when the new rules must …

Martin Harris wrote: “The bill is repealed two years following its enactment and this has already been enabled, thus it is no longer in effect.
Part 1
Preliminary provisions
3 Repeal of this Act
This Act is repealed on the earlier of—
(a) the date that is 2 years after the date of its commencement; and
(b) a date appointed by the Governor-General by Order in Council.”

Read it for yourself:
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2020/0246/latest/LMS344138.html

RELATED:

It’s Worse Than We Thought, What ‘THEY’ Just Declared!!!

G20 and the Next Pandemic

ACT NOW NEW ZEALAND! COVID BILL “DEEPLY CONCERNING”: HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Image by OpenClipart-Vectors from Pixabay

Medical practitioners are both ethically and legally obligated to ensure patients have an opportunity for informed consent, disclosing both risks and benefits of potential medical treatments

Story at-a-glance

  • Significant concerns have been raised surrounding antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE), and the possibility that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen COVID-19 disease via ADE
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice researchers called the risk of ADE in COVID-19 vaccines not only nontheoretical but also compelling
  • They noted that vaccine-elicited enhancement of disease has been previously found with SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome-related (MERs) coronaviruses, as well as feline coronavirus, all of which are closely related to SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19
  • Given the strong evidence of ADE risk from COVID-19 vaccines, the researchers believe that a separate informed consent form should be given out to those receiving the vaccine, warning them of the specific risk of worsened COVID-19 disease from vaccination
  • Despite researchers recommending back in October 2020 that ADE risk be “prominently and independently disclosed” to patients, no such warning exists

READ MORE

LINK: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/19/informed-consent-for-covid-vaccine.aspx?ui=685e66ad79a2084ce1076a1d6f40bd4323d01a706e69013a5023147b938dc9d7&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art2HL&cid=20210119&mid=DM771031&rid=1062469546

Image by Sozavisimost from Pixabay

The NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 includes the right to refuse any medical treatment & to hold opinions without interference

Note: this Bill of Rights has now been overridden by Adern’s new COVID-19 Bill. See below. Adern has promised children won’t be taken from their parents but I, like many Kiwis, am not holding my breath on that one. EWR

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:

1 The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)

2 The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)

3 The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)

4 The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)

 Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion.
This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief,
INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)

Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.

QUESTION MORE

(Note: Thanks to Wally Richards for this link)

READ AT THE LINK:

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/DLM224792.html

Did you know the military have been training for public unrest & NZ is now under martial law?

Listen to Billy Te Kahika, just out of Parliament after submissions on 5G among other things & hear the current tone of your corporation that parades as a government. Cold and heartless by all accounts. The corporation’s run out of government bonds apparently so will be borrowing hereon in from commercial banks. And your representatives are not interested in any perceived health effects from 5G in fact they’ve redefined health effects accordingly. (Related). Now that is timely and convenient isn’t it? It is what they’ve always done, watch Josh del Sol’s ‘Take Back Your Power‘ doco on that one. They just keep shifting the goalposts & presto it’s not dangerous at all. Listen up boiling frogs. Time is running short now. See the big $20 BILLION spend up on military just recently announced? You need to think and ask yourself, why is the military required to oversee your health? Isn’t that over kill? And back to the training, we’ve seen these practice runs in recent years where I’ve been saying, they are getting you used to seeing military among the public, on the streets literally. For the nay sayers, right now Adern has taken the power from the Police & signed it over to the military. Keeping our borders safe after the two new CV cases. Right now you will likely just feel ‘safe’ with that … but watch what transpires. This in my opinion is just the thin edge of many wedges we’re seeing of late. Now they have the authority to enter your homes and apply whatever is required to have you comply to the new rules… when that time comes …which I suspect will be related to testing you or administering the coming vaccine, because in spite of other treatments found successful by medics … they’ve squashed those … like the medical industry always has, your corporation would obviously prefer you use the vax. Seriously what are they up to with that?

Billy has started a new political party, first I’ve ever heard exposing & challenging the Agenda 2030 plans. Unique. It’s called the NZ Public Party. Link to their website here. EWR

Photo: Wikipedia