The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself
Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations

We’ve got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.

Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation


Published on Nov 7, 2016

CSIRO: Today I released my report in response to CSIROs climate science claims, that were presented at the meeting held with CSIRO senior scientists on Monday 26 September 2016 in Sydney. The key findings of Senator Roberts’ report shows that CSIRO: 1. Refuses to state that carbon dioxide from human activity is a danger 2. Does not have empirical evidence proving that carbon dioxide from human activity effects climate 3. Have used evidence in their presentation that contradicts the empirical climate evidence. 4. Uses climate computer models that are neither appropriate nor recommended to be used to inform government policy In the Senator’s first speech to the Senate he stated, “Australians should be able to rely on the information from Australian government bodies and institutions [such as the CSIRO] but we can’t.” “Queenslanders, everyday Australians, have lost jobs, paid higher taxes, wasted opportunities, lost businesses and fritted away scarce resources… nowhere is this issue more important than in our resource rich Queensland, which stands to lose the most of all our states” he said to the Senate. Senator Roberts’ research has shown billions of dollars have been wasted on mothballed white elephants such as useless desalination plants. “Our team will now move our primary focus on how the devastating economic impacts of climate alarmist polices are affecting everyday Australians, including higher taxes, destruction of industry, removal of sovereignty and implementation of appalling control mechanisms limiting personal freedom,” “The ultimate goal of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party is to dismantle Australia’s obsession with green guilt and assist in restoring our country’s former agricultural, manufacturing and economic base,” he said. At a press conference to release the report the senator was flanked by a number of renowned scientists and researchers who have supported his findings into the CSIRO. Those supporting the senator at his press conference were Internationally eminent Canadian climatologist, geographer and environmentalist Professor Tim Ball, expert on the United Nations’ unfounded and politically motivated climate claims cited by CSIRO; American engineer, investigator and researcher Mr Tony Heller, internationally respected for exposing manipulation of temperature data by a small unit within NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies and relied upon Australian scientist, engineer and inventor Mr Peter Bobroff who was awarded an Order of Australia Medal for his services to research and compiled the site reviewing CSIRO’s claims and presenting supporting data.

The Global Warming Scam

You may be surprized to learn that a total of 9,000 PhDs have signed a petition denying that CO2 is causing global warming. There are 31,000 scientists in total who have signed that petition.  In addition, 49 former NASA scientists have  written to NASA stating the following:

  • “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
  • “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
  • “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.” (read their full letter at the source)

In 2007, seven hundred scientists challenged the UN along similar lines. That number increased to a thousand in 2010. They far outnumber the mere 52 scientists who wrote the media-hyped IPCC  Summary for Policymakers in 2007.  You can read the reports at the link provided.


We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

Signed by a PhD in Physics (view at link)

The late Professor Frederick Seitz of Rockefeller University also continued to endorse the petition since its inception in 1998. Physicist Frederick Seitz was President of the US National Academy of Sciences and of Rockefeller University. He received the National Medal of Science, the Compton Award, the Franklin Medal, and numerous other awards, including honorary doctorates from 32 Universities around the world. He wrote in his endorsement that ‘… this treaty in our opinion is based on flawed ideas. Research data on climate change do not show that human use of hydrocarbons is harmful. To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful…’ (Read his full statement HERE at the Petition Project website where you will find a summary of the peer reviewed research, the signers and their qualifications).

You won’t hear this information highlighted however in the mainstream media. Again, follow the money trail. John Coleman, a Meteorologist of 60 years experience, the first weather man on Good Morning America, and the man who founded the weather channel, points out in one of the videos here some little known truths about the climate change industry. Coleman won Broadcast Meteorologist of the Year, from the American Meteorological Society of which he was a professional member for many years but finally quit when it became very clear that the politics had gotten in the way of the science. He says that the man made climate change movement is government funded to the tune of $4.7 billion per annum and is a whole industry unto itself. He traces the history of this theory back to its origins with the research of Roger Revelle, a 1950s graduate in Oceanography at the University of California at Berkley who proposed that CO2 from burning fossil fuels may be causing a rise in global temperature. Revelle later refuted his own theory however and even wrote to Congress saying so.   Now, Al Gore was a student of Roger Revelle for a short time, a student Revelle did not even remember, who picked up on Revelle’s early research and ran with it. He went on to write a book, make a documentary and eventually won the first Roger Revelle award in recognition of his work for the environment. Even when Revelle had refuted his own theory Gore dismissed this as the ramblings of senility and now refuses to even discuss the issue in spite of the disparity in facts and figures that scientists are highlighting. Coleman himself has studied the issues of so-called global warming (now called climate change he says since the warming has stopped) as carefully & completely as a good scientist can, and has reached an ‘absolute firm conclusion that there is no global warming’. The many models of atmospheric warming created by various people who’ve received tens of millions of dollars of Federal grant money and worked for the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), fail to match up with the real temperatures as measured both on earth and with the satellites. If you chart the temperatures he says, you can go back into the ‘70s and come up to today, and there’s almost no warming. There’s less than one degree warming since 1978, and absolutely no warming since 1998. Manipulated climate computer models have dramatically failed both in temperature predictions and their predictive warming signatures.

So the $4.7 billion tax money Coleman says, is funding a wide range of meaningless studies based on bad science that says carbon dioxide is causing warming. That money could be productively spent on energy research he believes.

We live in an era when research is funded by the very corporations that stand to gain from favourable outcomes and which, remember, now control governments. Scientists who buck the system & refuse to comply are sidelined or find themselves without a job or a career. We have to ask ourselves, could 31,000 scientists all be wrong? They believe the science is flawed but to speak out in that regard is now considered heresy and the gravy train rolls on… although many are waking up to it.

The first video here (with transcript) features Prof Ian Plimer, an Australian geologist who is addressing the UK Parliament. He gives an historical overview of climate change itself explaining, like Coleman, that climate has always changed and challenges  the science that claims it is man made. Listen/read with an open mind and remember, we all once thought the world was flat.

“The Climate Alarmists have never been right … why should we trust them now?”

Professor Ian Plimer speaking to UK Parliament on Climate Change

Professor Ian Plimer speaking to UK Parliament  on Climate Change  … Transcript
Geologist & author of ‘Heaven & Earth, Global Warming: The Missing Science’                                                                                                                                  I’m a Geologist, and the one thing that we miss out on in looking at climate change is the past. Climates have always changed. Climate changes in the past have been greater and faster than anything we experience in our lifetimes. And sea levels have always changed. Not by the modest couple of millimeters that people are citing, but we’ve had in the past sea level changes of only 1500 meters.
If we look back in the history of time, the atmosphere once had a very large amount of carbon dioxide in it. It’s now got less than .04%. Where did that carbon dioxide go to? It went into chalk, limestone, gels and life, and we’ve been sequestering carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere for only 10,500 million years. This planet has been de-gassing carbon dioxide since it first formed 4,567 thousand million years ago. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas. It has dominated the atmosphere for an extraordinarily long period of time. And we now are at a dangerously low level. If we halved the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere we would have no terrestrial plants. Carbon dioxide is plant food. It is not a pollutant. To use words like pollution with carbon dioxide is misleading and deceptive. But the past gives us a wonderful story. In the past we’ve had six major ice ages. We are currently in an ice age. It started 34 million years ago when Sth America pulled away from Antarctica and there was a circum polar current set up which isolated Antarctica and we started to get the Antartic ice sheet. We’ve had periods of glaciation & interglacials. We are currently in interglacial. And during that 34 million years we have refrigerated the earth. But for less than 20% of time we have had ice on planet earth. The rest of the time it’s been warmer and wetter, and there’s been more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And what did life do? It thrived. Six of the great ice ages were initiated when the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere was higher than now, in fact up to a thousand times higher. So we have from the geological evidence absolutely no evidence that carbon dioxide has driven climate. For some odd reason the major driver of climate is that great ball of heat in the sky which we call the sun. Every hundred thousand years our orbit changes from elliptical to circular. And we have a cycle of 90,000 years of cold & 10,000 years of warm. We’re in one of those warm cycles now. And every 43,000 years the axis of the earth changes a little bit, and every 21,000 years we get a little bit of a wobble. Each of those orbital events puts us further from the sun. Every now and then we get bombarded by cosmic rays, coming from the super nova eruptions somewhere out there, and if the sun’s magnetic field cannot drive these away, we start to form low level clouds. We’ve got extremely good evidence that this process has been going on for a very long period of time. Every now and then continents start to move, and they move at very rapid rates. They move about (holds hands up to measure) 8 inches every year. And at one time a continent can be over a pole and at another time it can be at the equator…. (Read the full transcript HERE) 

How the Global Warming Scare Began by John Coleman, Meteorologist

TRANSCRIPT                                                                                                                    I’m John Coleman and the name of this presentation is ‘There is No Significant Global Warming’. And I’m the guy that is just doggone sure of that. Now you may think that I’m just a paid off shill, Big Oil or something of that sort. No, no, no, no … they’ve never given me a nickel. I’m a television weather caster with 60 years experience … a meteorologist. I was the first weather man on Good Morning America, and the man who founded the weather channel, and this is my accomplishment… Broadcast Meteorologist of the Year, from the American Meteorological Society of which I was a professional member for many years. I finally quit the AMS when it became very clear to me that the politics had gotten in the way of the science and it was time to talk about something else. Now did we have a Winter or what in 2013, 14, oh man did we ever?  CLICK HERE FOR FULL TRANSCRIPT

The following  film, made by British television producer Martin Durkin, presents scientists, economists, politicians, writers, and others who dispute the scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic global warming.

The Great Global Warming Swindle

SITE GUIDE: To search for articles go to  ‘Categories’ on the left hand side of the page, use the search box at the top right of the page, or the tag cloud on the right.

 Climate Change UPDATES:

Interview & article on rising sea levels, ‘the greatest lie ever told’ … Dr Mörner  24 May 2015

Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’

“If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels….” Dr Mörner however, a former Stockholm professor,  has spent 35 years in the field actually measuring sea levels as opposed to the computer models employed by the global warming advocates… UK Telegraph … READ THE ARTICLE HERE


Two examples of how we are being badly lied to by the left wing media about Cyclone Pam. First, the BBC, in their report on 16th March, showed the above chart. By claiming that windspeeds of 300 km/h, just below those of Tip, they can give the impression that Pam was one of the strongest storms ever…. read article HERE

However, their figure of 300 km/h is grossly overstated.

Your reasonably concise & non abusive comments are welcome.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Watching our environment … our health … and corporations … exposing lies and corruption

%d bloggers like this: