Facebook Censoring Vaccine Concerns Globally

NoFakeNews's avatarNoFakeNews

Dr. John Reizer

Facebook wants to censor people’s concerns about vaccines. Does this fact surprise anyone even remotely awake at this point? All social media platforms want to censor the public’s concerns about vaccines, the fake pandemic, and anything else that has to do with the genocidal operation currently in play.

Original Source

Giant tech platforms want to silence and censor people’s vaccine hesitancy; they want to silence people forever. That is why they are all promoting the initiative to cull a significant portion of the human population.

Are people so naïve to believe that Mark Zuckerberg is the actual genius and financier behind the giant spy company, Facebook? Founded in 2004 but first developed years earlier at the “elite” Harvard University after the 911 false flag operation, Facebook had to be heavily financed and supported by global intelligence agencies working for a world governing construct. Facebook had to be…

View original post 535 more words

Prominent physician: Don’t get a COVID shot

My critique of NZ Budget 2021 – from an environmental perspective Budget 2021 is infuriatingly underwhelming

Model Dies Days After Receiving AstraZeneca Covid Vaccine

Nwo Report's avatarMurray Report

‘I am completely drained, no energy and my whole body hurts with sore and weak joints…’

Source:Adan Salazar

British model Stephanie Dubois died from a blood clot days after receiving AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine.

According to Greek media, Dubois, 39, suffered a “serious thrombotic episode” on May 14 and needed to hospitalized after receiving her first Covid dose on May 6.

“It is understood she suffered a brain hemorrhage and was in a coma before she died on Saturday afternoon,” reports the Cyprus Mail.

Days after taking the jab, Dubois, who health officials said had no underlying health conditions, reportedly described feeling under the weather.

“So I had the vaccination today! I hate needles, today was no exception . . . And now I feel horrendous . . . pizza and bed for me,” she wrote on Facebook.

However, her conditioned soon worsened; her body began convulsing involuntarily and…

View original post 272 more words

The FDA cover-up that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine

HKW's avatarJustice-4-Poland.com

by Jon Rappoport

May 25, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

As I’ve been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans, they’re abject failures. They can’t keep their own story straight.

Thanks to an alert reader, I’ve come across a new blockbuster.

BY THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency’s Emergency Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data.

Here we go.

The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]

It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for…

View original post 1,205 more words

Some points of concern to consider with NZ’s CV response to date

From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey @ fb

Here are some of my concerns about the C-V response.
I’ve used information from diverse sources to try to create a jigsaw puzzle which connects as many pieces as possible. I fully agree that some parts are not yet clear. It is a work in progress to try to make sense of a serious and confusing situation.


The starting points for me are:

1) The PCR test is unreliable

2) so called “Covid” deaths are deaths within 28 days of a positive PCR test. Many of these deaths are WITH Covid, not FROM Covid

3) the death rate in most countries last year was similar to the death rate every other year- and median age of Covid deaths is in the eighties- similar to median age of all deaths

4) since deaths started to be reported as Covid, there have been few deaths reported as flu or pneumonia

5) the Covid response is responsible for considerably more harm in NZ and many other countries than “Covid” -the mental health effects are particularly devastating

6) with or without vaccines, we are ultimately all dependent on our immune systems. The focus must be on how we can enhance our overall immunity and well being

7) the research showing the importance of Vit D is compelling yet largely ignored by our government

8) Research showing the effectiveness of Ivermectin on Covid outcomes and reports from doctors who use it, is compelling

9) The clinical (Safety) trials for the Pfizer Vax won’t be complete until April 2023. So far they have looked only at 2 months exposure

10) The safety data sheet and Risk Management Plan for the Pfizer VX identify serious and important safety concerns and gaps in safety testing

11) The risks in NZ from the Pfizer Vax are considerably greater for most people than the risks from covid..recent analysis shows 1/4000 are having anaphylactic type reactions possibly due to the polyethylene glycol on the lipid nanoparticles

12) The S (spike) protein causes an array of blood clotting and other disorders- whether it’s generated from an mRNA Vax, from the AZ VX, from covid or an injection of S

13) There is serious under reporting of Vax injuries in NZ and internationally. The NZ CARM database is secret and reports from it are delayed and selective

14) Pfizer has demanded confidentiality and a full indemnity from the government. If they don’t trust their product, why should we?

15) The first duty of medicine is “Do no harm”. The second is requiring Informed Consent to any treatment, which demands discussion about risks, benefits, uncertainties and alternatives.

The current government dogma fails at every level.
Only with open transparent sharing of information can we rebuild trust.

Photo: Image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay

Facebook’s Massive Global Censorship To Silence Vaccine Skeptics

CDC alters PCR testing guidelines to artificially boost vaccine “efficacy”…

Truth2Freedom's avatarTruth2Freedom's Blog

Article Image • Natural News – Lance Johnson

(Natural News) The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are using deliberate acts of deception, medical fraud and data manipulation to artificially boost the appearance of “efficacy” for the new mRNA vaccine experiments. The fraud is out in the open as of May 1, 2021 because the CDC made sweeping new policy changes that fraudulently alter the definition of a “covid case” after vaccination.

Overnight, all “asymptomatic” and mild “covid cases” no longer count, as long as the person is fully vaccinated. The CDC is manipulating the data to blame all future “covid cases” on the unvaccinated, to perpetuate a cycle of medical fraud and force vaccines on the population.

The CDC is also manipulating the data to conceal the fact that those who get covid-19 post vaccination are up to ten times more likely to die than those who…

View original post 204 more words

If You’ve Had Covid, Please Don’t Get Vaccinated

stuartbramhall's avatarThe Most Revolutionary Act

Dr Mercola

Story at-a-glance

  • An international survey of 2,002 people found that people who had previously had COVID-19 experienced “significantly increased incidence and severity” of side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine
  • Dr. Hooman Noorchashm has repeatedly warned the FDA that “clear and present danger” exists for those who have had COVID-19 and subsequently get vaccinated
  • At issue are viral antigens that remain in the body after a person is naturally infected; the immune response reactivated by the COVID-19 vaccine may trigger inflammation in tissues where the viral antigens exist
  • The inner lining of blood vessels, the lungs and the brain may be particularly at risk of such inflammation and damage, which could lead to major thromboembolic complications
  • Noorchashm believes that people should be screened for SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins prior to COVID-19 vaccination, while vaccination should be delayed for people with symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 infections, as well as those who…

View original post 581 more words

Analysis of test sticks from surface testing (Slovak Republic)

Analysis of test sticks from surface testing in the Slovak Republic – confirmation of genocide

EWR comment: Viewing this information is not for the faint hearted, or the skeptical. With all that is transpiring at this stage world wide one has to keep an open mind and consider all information. From my own research in recent years I know that what is contained in this article is very real. Listen to the videos by Celeste Solum on Youtube. She is ex FEMA. There are many people about who are sharing their inside knowledge of what is going down around us, info that we are not normally privy to. There is much info available and it will take much of your time to read it. Still never has there been a more crucial time in my opinion, in which we really must take that time to educate ourselves. I believe our very survival depends upon it. EWR

From nutritruth.org

Analysis of test sticks from surface testing in the Slovak Republic – confirmation of genocide.

The analysis was performed in the months November 2020 to March 2021 on test sticks in sets. SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in an unnamed hospital laboratory from Bratislava, Slovakia. The test swabs were from the sets used in surface testing in Slovakia and in hospitals.

Anyone who has at least a standard school microscope and a test microscope can verify the information regarding the test swabs published here. All information about test swabs, Darpa Hydrogels, and lithium is publicly available in scientific and corporate work. Links to some are at the end of the document.

From this information it is clear that test sticks are a criminal tool of genocide in the population of Slovakia. This is a worldwide, thoughtful and carefully prepared event.

READ MORE

https://www.nutritruth.org/single-post/analysis-of-test-sticks-from-surface-testing-in-the-slovak-republic-confirmation-of-genocide?fbclid=IwAR3ZmWu-m09lcgDiXPxkxqWAK4DcOqwUIRQGA5vPceusm9vha7wqs9kKnFo

Photo: by mufid-majnun @ unsplash.com

Why Are Thousands of Vaccine Deaths Being Ignored? (From an MD)

From mercola.com

How Many Have Died From COVID Vaccines?
Story at-a-glance
  • Each year, more than 165 million Americans get the flu shot. There were 85 reported deaths following influenza vaccination in 2017; 119 deaths in 2018; and 203 deaths in 2019
  • Between mid-December 2020 and April 23, 2021, at which point between 95 million and 100 million Americans had received their COVID-19 shots, there were 3,544 reported deaths following COVID vaccination, or about 30 per day
  • In just four months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed more people than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years
  • As of April 23, 2021, VAERS had also received 12,618 reports of serious adverse events. In total, 118,902 adverse event reports had been filed
  • In the European Union, the EudraVigilance system had as of April 17, 2021, received 330,218 injury reports after vaccination with one of the four available COVID vaccines, including 7,766 deaths

In a May 5, 2021, Fox News report, Tucker Carlson asked the question no one is really allowed to ask: “How many Americans have died after taking the COVID vaccine?”1

If you haven’t paid attention, the answer to this verboten (forbidden) question may shock you. Carlson points out (inaccurately, if you ask me) that vaccines have been shown to be generally safe, citing statistics on how many Americans have died after the seasonal influenza vaccine in recent years.

Each year, more than 165 million Americans get the flu shot, and according to the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), there were 85 reported deaths following influenza vaccination in 2017; 119 deaths in 2018; and 203 deaths in 2019. “How do those rates compare to the death rates from the coronavirus vaccine?” Carlson asks. The answer is, there’s really no comparison.

READ MORE

https://tinyurl.com/yn5z5z39

How Lockdowns Helped Hide That COVID-19 Isn’t A Reason For Panic

Governmental Deception's avatarDecoded-Information

What’s obvious to many Americans about the response to the COVID-19 pandemic continues to escape the consciousness of the ruling class.

Source: How Lockdowns Helped Hide That COVID-19 Isn’t A Reason For Panic

View original post

REINER FUELLMICH INTERVIEW. “We Filed the CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY LAWSUIT”

The Myth of the ‘Asymptomatic Spreader’ Dealt Another Blow This Week — Aletho News

stuartbramhall's avatarThe Most Revolutionary Act

21st Century Wire | May 24, 2021

Since the pandemic crisis began in early 2020, government and public health officials have been adamant that any difficult measures taken were all being done in order to ‘control the spread of the virus’ or ‘stop the disease.’ Thus, a litany of so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions, and also pharmaceutical interventions – were deemed by the consensus to be essential measures in fighting the spread of what was being characterized as an asymptomatic disease.

Over a year later, a few industrious ‘public health’ mavens have summoned the courage to actually test this fundamental assumption. Recently in the UK, officials have staged and monitored nine large-scale events, including an FA Cup final football match, and the Brit Awards – both of which were exempt from the usual COVID rules. The results of this test should be hailed as good news, but for those heavily invested in…

View original post 500 more words

UK Vaccine Angst: Millions Secretly Surveilled After Taking Shot

CHD calls on FDA to immediately take COVID vaccines off the market

Shedding Light On The Dishonorable Record Of Dr. Fauci – A Real Mengele

Anti Oligarch's avatarAnti Oligarch

By F. William Engdahl New Eastern OutlookApr 23, 2020

In 2008, US President George W. Bush presents the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Fauci “for his determined and aggressive efforts to help others live longer and healthier lives.”

Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and other steps must be taken. In many cases the radical and severe measures, such as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by COVID-19 case projections of morbidity into the future. If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of dealing with the coronavirus in Washington it is the Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr. Tony Fauci. What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role is his highly controversial and conflicted…

View original post 2,083 more words

Truth about Taxes – 29th April 2021.

How our present and future needs have been balanced – by lumbering each household with $95,000 in govt debt

tutere44's avatarPoint of Order

As  all   the  lobby group  shouting  fades in  the  wake of the  budget,   how    is  the  real  verdict  shaping  up ?

If  from the  Labour  camp,  you’d  say it was  a   financial  triumph,  balanced  but  with a  bold  vision.  And,  as Sir  Michael Cullen asserted,  there  is   “a  real degree of  bravery”  in the benefit  increases.

According  to Sir  Michael,  Finance  Minister  Grant  Robertson

” .. has  done  a  superb  job   in writing a  budget  which  balances  present  and  future  needs,  begins  to  address our  social inequities and  provides a  solid  foundation for  future  sustainable  growth”.

For  Sir Michael,  this  is  just the  beginning:  he  sees this  as the  first  part of a trilogy  of  budgets.  Roll  on  the other  two!

On the  other  side  of the fence, the   drumbeat was  a   bit   more  discordant.  The praise  certainly was  not  quite  so  fulsome.

View original post 713 more words

Censured NZ Doctor speaks out … ‘The censorship is real …. Doctors fear losing their jobs’

Interview from Voices for Freedom (NZ site, info below)

EWR comment: NZ Medical Doctors have been instructed in no uncertain terms what is expected of them regarding the official narrative they must comply with with regard to the CV VX. Dr Sam Bailey is one of the medical professionals who signed a letter to the NZ government expressing concern & who has already lost employment for her actions. She is one of those who takes her oath ‘do no harm’ with great seriousness.

New Zealand Doctor Sam Bailey speaks out…The Censorship is Real….Its Unprecedented https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=7aMYZFIieRk…

ADDITIONAL CHANNEL INFO:

Voices For Freedom 918 subscribers

Dr Samantha Bailey joins us at Voices For Freedom for our weekly Courageous Conversation Live Webinar. In this video Dr Sam discusses the censorship she has endured since last year and why she feels compelled to stand up and speak out. Check out the full length unedited webinar separately. To view Dr Sam’s videos visit https://www.youtube.com/c/DrSamBailey… To purchase the “Virus Mania” book: New Zealanders: Limited stock is available locally for $65 (including shipping) by contacting admin@drsambailey.com putting “VIRUS MANIA – VOICES” in your subject line.

Abe: https://www.abebooks.com/products/isb…
US Independent Bookseller Powell’s Books: https://www.powells.com/book/virus-ma…
Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-CO…
Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-CO…
___________________________________________________________________

RELATED:

Medical Cncl of NZ – “There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promoting of anti-vaccination claims”

NEW ZEALAND COVID 19 VACCINATION ADVERSE REACTIONS DATA IS MISSING

From The Health Forum NZ @ fb

NEW ZEALAND COVID 19 VACCINATION ADVERSE REACTIONS DATA IS MISSING
On a cold and blustery Sunday afternoon I thought I’d just cruise by the Medsafe website and check in on the latest Adverse Reaction reporting for the Covid 19 vaccine roll out in New Zealand.
To say I’m “gob smacked” would be an understatement.
Before I got into the Medsafe monitoring data I whizzed over to the Herald vaccine tracker to see how many jabs have now been administered.
As of 18th May (the latest data on the site) 474,435 jabs have been given in New Zealand. This is made up of a combination of some first and some second doses.
So we are a wee bit short of half a million jabs jabbed.
Then I got myself in a total pickle, thinking somehow my brain and Google were combining in a Sunday afternoon brain fog meltdown.
Why?
Because try as i may…google as i may…. i simply could only find “safety data” pertaining to the first 168,452 jabs administered in NZ.
By my calculation that left 305,983 jabs administered with ZERO ADVERSE REACTION DATA available for public viewing.
THAT MEANS THE MEDSAFE MONITORING SYSTEM IS MISSING PUBLIC FACING DATA FOR 64% OF ALL COVID 19 VACCINES ADMINISTERED IN NEW ZEALAND.
As this is a vaccine with only provisional consent in New Zealand, with many outstanding safety, purity and efficacy questions still remaining unanswered by Pfizer…
As this is a vaccine that has only received Emergency Use Authorisation in other countries where Covid is rampant (e.g. has not met the standards required for a full authorised use)…
As there is post release data collection and safety monitoring set to continue for another 2 years, to determine just exactly how safe and effective this vaccine is…
As there is a growing chorus of esteemed scientists, immunologists, and doctors around the world calling for a halt to the roll out of this vaccine due to the unprecedented levels of injury and deaths reported to safety monitoring systems around the world…
SHOULDNT WE BE ASKING LOUD AND DEMANDING QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW OUR SAFETY MONITORING SYSTEM CAN POSSIBLY BE LOOKING FOR SAFETY ISSUES IN OUR NEW ZEALAND POPULATION….WHEN THE DATA REMAINS UNPROCESSED OR MISSING IN ACTION?
How can New Zealanders read the safety monitoring data as part of their process of informed consent?
It is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE.
Having calmed myself from this gob smack, i decided to have a close look at the two latest Adverse Reaction reports that we do actually have.
Peering back to April 17th…over 5 weeks ago….the last data available to the public…
I find 347 Adverse reaction reports in the week since the previous report. Of these 322 were deemed “non serious” and 25 deemed serious.
I worked out that these reports covered the administration of 50,000 jabs. Of the “serious”, 12 were Anaphylaxis at the time of injection; 8 severe flu like symptoms; amnesia; tinnitus; abnormal blood tests; appendicitis AND BRAIN BLOOD CLOT….more specifically Venous Sinus Thrombosis.
Medsafe ruled out both the appendicitis and the blood clot as being connected to the vaccine. How? We don’t know. We don’t get to see how or why these issues are ruled out (despite blood clots figuring in adverse reaction data around the world….and yes, for Pfizer not just Astra Zeneca)
Then i jumped back in time even further to have a peek at the Adverse Reactions report number 6, released on 10April, covering the previous 7 days.
That report contained 254 Adverse reaction reports, 241 non serious and 13 serious.
The serious reports included 8 Anaphylaxis; 1 Inflammatory muscle pain; Drug administration error (yikes, what??); headache with collapse; blood clots (plural) and stroke.
Blood clots and stroke were deemed “not related to the vaccine”.
How and why was this decided “not connected”? We don’t get to find out.
In the past week we have also been informed via a very brief news report of 4 deaths post Covid 19 vaccine.
All were ruled “not related to the vaccine”.
How? Why? We don’t get to find out.
So to all the New Zealanders currently wondering whether to have their Covid 19 jab….or “watch and wait”….and do their research (e.g. track injury in New Zealand)…
I can confidently tell you, in terms of up to date vital Medsafe data you and I are officially “flying blind”.
New Zealand is acknowledged as having one of the highest reporting incidents of Adverse Reactions in the world…with up to 10% of all occurring injuries actually reported to monitoring systems.
That leaves an estimated 90% of reactions UNREPORTED.
https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-7.asp
https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-6.asp
https://www.pharmiweb.com/…/breaking-news-doctors…

America’s Frontline Doctors File Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Against Use of COVID Vaccines in Children

[Health Impact News]

by Mordechai Sones
America’s Frontline Doctors

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting a temporary restraining order against the emergency use authorization (EUA) permitting using the COVID-19 vaccines in children under the age of 16, and that no further expansion of the EUAs to children under the age of 16 be granted prior to the resolution of these issues at trial.

The case will challenge the EUAs for the injections on several counts, based on the law and scientific evidence that the EUAs should never have been granted, the EUAs should be revoked immediately, the injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself, and that numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting these EUAs and foisting these injections on the American people.

AFLDS Founder Dr. Simone Gold spoke about the reasons for filing the motion: “We doctors are pro-vaccine, but this is not a vaccine,” she said. “This is an experimental biological agent whose harms are well-documented (although suppressed and censored) and growing rapidly, and we will not support using America’s children as guinea pigs.”

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/americas-frontline-doctors-file-motion-for-temporary-restraining-order-against-use-of-covid-vaccines-in-childrenamericas-frontline-doctors-file-motion-for-temporary-restraining-order-against-use-o/

AstraZeneca jab trips Bluetooth notification, connecting TV to man’s body

From markcrispinmiller.com

Be sure to scroll down to the other links below the first.

From a friend:

Unbelievable! Make sure you see 55 seconds in as he walks up to a TV in an establishment without his cellphone and it senses a sensor and trips the TV to connect to him! Everywhere he goes, he keeps getting a Bluetooth notification.

AstraZeneca Shot Bluetooth Side Effect

https://www.brighteon.com/e0f46536-674c-4756-97d5-aab54b76c12f

Extremely troubling:

Deaths Increase Dramatically After Mass Inoculations:

https://www.brighteon.com/d751b219-9e31-4bac-952d-51a870dfec89

“The Highwire” took to the street to do their own magnetic testing. Six out of 15 people’s arms attracted the magnets:

THE COVID VACCINE MAGNET CHALLENGE

https://www.brighteon.com/ed8a77af-6e1c-42e7-ab45-81df79dd4e68

World Economic Forum Urges Companies To Fire Unvaccinated Employees As Part of ‘Jobs Reset,’ Deletes Tweet After Backlash

U.K. to deploy door-to-door covid vaccine “hit squads” – NaturalNews.com

It’s true … door to door, military. An image from a social media post (added by EWR)

Governmental Deception's avatarDecoded-Information

The government of Great Britain has announced that in order to get more people “vaccinated” with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), jab-armed “hit squads” are now being […]

Source: U.K. to deploy door-to-door covid vaccine “hit squads” – NaturalNews.com

View original post

Could Magnetic Hydrogel Explain the COVID Vax Magnet Phenomenon?

by Makia Freeman
The Freedom Articles

via Health Impact News

Could advances in magnetic hydrogel be the reason for the bizarre COVID vax magnet phenomenon?

This sensation is becoming very well documented, with numerous COVID vaxxed people worldwide demonstrating on video that a magnet will stick on their arm at the injection site, but nowhere else on their body.

TimTruth.com has released another compilation, this time a 47-minute version with people of all ages and cultures showing what happens.

It represents overwhelming evidence that this is a real occurrence, despite what desperate debunkers and vaccine apologists claim, although vaccine apologists isn’t a good term for them, since this chemical cocktail injection is a non-vaccine.

In some videos, people take the very same magnet off their arm and stick it right back on their fridge where it stays. Metallic nanoparticles is a good guess to explain what could be happening.

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/could-magnetic-hydrogel-explain-the-covid-vax-magnet-phenomenon/

93 Israeli doctors: “Do not use Covid-19 vaccine on children”

“We believe that not even a handful of children should be endangered through mass vaccination against a disease not dangerous to them.”

From israelnationalnews.com

93 doctors have signed a joint letter of protest calling to refrain from administering Covid-19 vaccines to children.

In a letter, the contents of which reached Channel 12, submitted this morning, the doctors explained that “There is no room to vaccinate children at this time,” and based the call on “the following values – the value of caution, the value of humility”, as well as understanding that “haste is from the devil.” They also cited “the recognition that we do not understand everything about the virus and the vaccine against it,” and “the first commandment of medicine – ‘First do not harm.'”

READ MORE

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/304124?fbclid=IwAR0wHqaY283tb752fDPIoq9k7UWWoPMYef_WjNAgR74-c7k0yXNijU3Dunw

Information you may like to read about the PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE trials (Physicians for Informed Consent)

Education: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Risk Statement (VRS)

This vaccine has not been approved or licensed, and is still under investigation.1

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine:
Short-Term Efficacy & Safety Data

  1. WHAT IS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) is made from synthetic genetic material that is immersed in fatty substances, including cholesterol and polyethylene glycol (PEG). More specifically, modified RNA molecules that encode for a mutated spike (S) protein antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the virus that can cause COVID-19, are immersed in lipid nanoparticles. The drug is administered in two intramuscular 30 mcg doses, 21 days apart.1

  1. HOW WAS THE VACCINE STUDIED PRIOR TO OBTAINING EUA?

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has obtained emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently investigational.1 The vaccine was studied through nonclinical data from rats and nonhuman primates, and clinical data from humans. The EUA was based on a human clinical trial comparing approximately 22,000 subjects who received the vaccine with 22,000 subjects who did not receive the vaccine (Table 1).2 The trial included a median observation period of two months; 50.6% of subjects were followed up for about two months after the second dose.2 The FDA states that due to the length of the clinical trial’s observation period, “it is not possible to assess sustained efficacy over a period longer than 2 months.”3

  1. DOES THE VACCINE PREVENT HOSPITALIZATIONS AND DEATHS?

Since only two hospitalized cases of COVID-19 were observed, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations from COVID-19.3 See Table 1. The FDA states, “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.”3

  1. HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE VACCINE IN ADULTS AND THE ELDERLY?

Vaccine effectiveness was calculated by observing the vaccination status of 178 COVID-19 cases, where a COVID-19 case was defined as the presence of at least one COVID-19 symptom and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test at least seven days after the second dose. In subjects 18 to 64 years old, the vaccine was 89%–98% effective over a two-month observation period.3,4 However, since there were only 15 COVID-19 cases observed in subjects 65 to 74 years old and only five cases in subjects 75 years or older, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to accurately measure the vaccine’s effectiveness in those age groups.4 The vaccine may be only 53% effective in subjects 65 to 74 years old and 0% effective in subjects 75 years or older.4 See Table 1. Subjects 65 years or older comprise about 80% of all COVID-19 deaths, and subjects 75 years or older comprise about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths.5

  1. IS THE VACCINE EFFECTIVE IN CHILDREN?

Safety and efficacy data was either not tested or insufficient in children younger than 16 years old. In addition, since there was only one case of COVID-19 in subjects 16 to 17 years old, the study did not have enough statistical power to measure effectiveness in that age group.4 See Table 1.

  1. IS THE VACCINE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING INFECTION WITH SARS-COV-2 OR THE SPREAD OF COVID-19?

The Pfizer clinical trial was not designed to observe asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 or the effect of the vaccine on the spread (transmission) of COVID-19. Consequently, the FDA states that “it is possible that asymptomatic infections may not be prevented as effectively as symptomatic infections” and “data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.” Furthermore, “additional evaluations including data from clinical trials and from vaccine use post-authorization will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing virus shedding and transmission, in particular in individuals with asymptomatic infection.”3 Approximately 40% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic.6

  1. WHAT IS THE RISK OF A SEVERE SIDE EFFECT FROM THE VACCINE?

The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events during the two-month observation period to be 1.1%, or 1 in 91, in the vaccinated group and 0.6% in the unvaccinated group, resulting in a vaccine risk of 0.5% or 1 in 200 vaccinated subjects.2 Consequently, subjects who received the vaccine had nearly double the risk of a severe adverse event occurring in the two-month observation period compared to subjects who did not receive the vaccine. See Table 1. A severe adverse event was defined as one that “interferes significantly with participant’s usual function.”7

Of note, approximately 3,400 or 8% of all subjects experienced “suspected COVID-19” because they had symptoms but were not confirmed by testing for SARS-CoV-2; two of these cases required hospitalization, both of which were in the vaccinated group. These cases could represent other influenza-like illness and adverse events; 409 such cases occurred in the vaccinated group within seven days of injection whereas 287 such cases occurred in the unvaccinated group in the same time period. Only the cases that were reported as serious were recorded as adverse events.3 In the clinical trial, only 5% of all illnesses suspected of being COVID-19 were actually found to be COVID-19.

After emergency use authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was obtained and mass vaccination began, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recorded about 5,000 “health impact events” among 215,000 vaccinated subjects (1 in 43) that, similar to the definition of severe adverse events in the clinical trial, prevented the ability to perform normal daily activities, including work, and required medical attention.8

Additionally, as there were only 11,600 subjects 16 to 55 years of age who received the vaccine,3 and since as of Feb. 2, 2021, about 1 in 31,000 people 15 to 34 years of age contracted a fatal case of COVID-19 in the U.S.,5 the clinical trial does not have sufficient data to determine safety in subjects who are 15 to 34 years of age. Per the FDA, “There are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in subpopulations such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.”3 And, because all subjects were observed for only two months, the long-term safety of the vaccine for any age group is not known.

  1. IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE EFFECTIVE AND SAFER THAN COVID-19?

The extent to which the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is effective and safer than COVID-19 is not known. The clinical trial indicates that in subjects 65 to 74 years old, the vaccine may be only 53% effective, and in subjects 75 years or older, the age group that comprises about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths, the vaccine may be 0% effective; also, in children age 16 to 17 the vaccine may not be effective. The clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations and deaths, and the trial did not assess if the vaccine prevents asymptomatic infection or spread (transmission) of the virus.

Severe adverse events in the vaccine group occurred in 1 in 91 subjects in the Pfizer clinical trial. The CDC has recorded that 1 in 43 vaccinated subjects was unable to perform normal daily activities and required medical attention. Furthermore, for people 15 to 34 years of age, the clinical trial did not include enough subjects to be able to show that the vaccine is safer than the disease, and because the clinical trial observation period lasted only two months, the incidence of long-term side effects from the vaccine for any age group is not known.


REFERENCES

1. Hinton, Denise M. (U.S . Food and Drug Administration). Letter to: Elisa Harkins (Pfizer Inc.). 2020 Dec 23. https://www.fda.gov/media/144412/download.
2. Pfizer. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048): Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee briefing document. Meeting date: 10 December 2020. 2020 Nov 30: 38,46. https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download.
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020:14,16,17,20,24, 30,31,40,46,48. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020. Table 8: subgroup analyses of second primary endpoint: first COVID-19 occurrence from 7 days after dose 2, by subgroup, participants with and without evidence of infection prior to 7 days after dose 2, evaluable efficacy (7 days) population; 26. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Weekly updates by select demographic and geographic characteristics: provisional death counts for coronavirus disease (COVID-19); [cited 2021 Feb 2]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex.

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. COVID-19 pandemic planning scenarios; [updated 2020 Sep 10; cited 2021 Jan 13]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html.

7.Pfizer. A phase 1/2/3 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of RNA vaccine candidates against COVID-19 in healthy individuals. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf.

8. Clark T. Anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine receipt. COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 Dec 19; [cited 2021 Mar 16]. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-Clark-508.pdf.

These statements are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as personal medical advice.

© 2021 Physicians for Informed Consent, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization. All rights reserved. Apr 2021.

SOURCE:

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-risk-statement/?fbclid=IwAR1iZ2He6sYTmIM3TdYL7vYCwFWATuSVrA2-CA8g8UhzT5Q4q74A5lqY464

The Markets Are Rigged (Corbett Report)

From James Corbett. Watch at the link below.

At base, the markets are a con game where the rich and powerful employ a raft of confidence men to lure suckers into the latest mania. In this game, the suckers are the general public who are left holding the bag as the market bubble bursts while the smart money swoops in to buy up the leftover assets at pennies on the dollar. In this week’s edition of The Corbett Report, James Corbett pulls back the curtain on the Wall Street casino and reveals how the house always wins the rigged games.

TRANSCRIPT AND MP3 AUDIO : https://www.corbettreport.com/markets/

Note: The Wall Street Gang by Richard Ney is an excellent read on topic. I purchased it real cheap online back in 2005 or thereabouts. I see it’s now selling from between $300 & $1000 US. No precis of the book either. I’ve noticed this with another book about land ownership … it’s a time when these truths only a few noticed back then, are coming to the fore. They don’t of course want you to know so the book becomes ‘inaccessible’. EWR

Photo: Corbett Report screenshot

Meet NZ’s only source of truth

Jacinda Adern a former president of Socialist Youth

WATCH/LISTEN AT THE LINK:

https://www.facebook.com/messenger_media?thread_id=100054962889091&attachment_id=458855108555811&message_id=mid.%24cAAAAC_mR9f5_YEBo515LvsQ0o35C

RELATED:

Comrade Jacinda Ardern (VIDEO – Jacinda Adern speaking at a socialist youth rally in Hungary

Still a Comrade (2017 interview with Adern on topic)

Image by Hier und jetzt endet leider meine Reise auf Pixabay aber from Pixabay