Of course they are
Source:
- The Facts:A study published in the British Journal of Nutrition outlines a significant difference in nutritional content when it comes to organic food compared to non-organic food.
- Reflect On:Are the justifications used to to spray our crops actually justified? Are they really necessary or can we figure out a better way of doing things?
It has long been argued that there is no difference in nutritional content between organic crops and conventional crops. However, it’s turning out that this assumption simply isn’t true. It’s no secret that more consumers are seeking organically grown food, coming from the perception that the pesticides sprayed on conventional crops are harmful to human health. But what does the science say?
advertisement – learn more
A study published in the British Journal of Nutrition carried out a meta-analysis based on 343 peer-reviewed publications that indicate “statistically significant and meaningful differences in composition between organic…
View original post 132 more words
Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
on China epidemic –
just got this comment:
“What if the deaths are from not a virus but a cellular degradation caused by 5G that just mimics virus effects??”
we are talking about it in comments on this post –
[ok to delete this comment]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks FC will take a look in morning 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
many good articles up on Jon Rappoport’s blog –
https://nomorefakenews.com/
I put it on the FC blog …. https://flyingcuttlefish.wordpress.com/2020/01/25/china-virus/
LikeLiked by 1 person