From https://citizensfor5gawareness.org

The following is a letter dated July 25, 2019, written to the Mr. William Broad from one of our members

Dear Mr. Broad,
I am an avid New York Times reader as well as an advocate for the re-evaluation of Radio Frequency uses and guidelines across the board. It is a topic I have devoted a year and a half to researching extensively, speaking with top experts on the issue like Dr. David Carpenter, Dr. Devra Davis, Dr. Joel Moskowitz, Dr. Hugh Taylor, Richard Tell and many others. As a parent of school age children my focus has been on the cumulative chronic RF exposures at school which leave modern day students exposed 6 hour a day for each of the 180 days per school year, for their 13 years of education. After reading your recent article ‘The 5G Health Hazard That Isn’t’, I found it to be quite misleading and inaccurate on the topic. Dr. Carpenter and Dr. Curry are merely two among thousands of highly accredited  professionals from around the world who are in agreement that RF can cause adverse health effects in many different respects. Almost all of our major U.S. institutes have a chaired professional who agrees on the possible dangers, ie: Yale University, Harvard, UC Berkley, Columbia, NYU, University at Albany, NIH, National Toxicology Program, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Environmental Medicine to name a few. Missing in your article was the European Union’s use of the Bioinitiative report as a resource for declaring the precautionary principle on radio frequencies. With countries like France, Cyprus, Israel, India and Italy removing WiFi from schools and issuing public notice, it is hard to deny that they must have consulted with experts and determined there is enough weighted evidence to warrant precaution.

READ MORE

https://citizensfor5gawareness.org/citizens-for-5g-awareness-responds-to-the-new-york-times/