Tag Archives: taxation

agenda 21/30, New World Order, News

Learn how long they’ve been planning what’s going on today & who’s behind it

4 Comments

From Jason Christoff

This info is from the Dr. Richard Day Tapes recorded in 1969 from a private meeting and summarised below. “Dr. Day not only worked as a professor at a Pittsburgh medical University, he also practiced medicine at several prominent hospitals in the United States. In 1969 he gathered 80 of his fellow medical doctors together for a compassionate meeting in Pittsburgh, regarding the social engineering changes that were coming over their lifetimes and the lifetimes of their children. All 80 doctors were told not to bring any recording equipment or paper etc, simply because if anyone officially transcribed what Dr. Richard Day was saying, his life would most likely be in jeopardy.” 

You can listen to the tapes yourself,  just click here. EWNZ

In no particular order…. and remember this confession by Dr. Richard Day was spoken in 1969.

1. That doctors were going to become paid assassins and that doctors who didn’t conform to “remove their patients“, on the say so of the government, would no longer be doctors. This of course happened during COVID en masse, as doctors and nurses killed their patients on cue. 

2. That 9/11 would happen in the US. The actual date and location weren’t mentioned. This act of terrorism was mentioned against the US in 1969 and so was the reason that the US would be attacked in this way. The US was attacked on 9/11 by “the order”, which Dr. Day referred to during his 1969 confession. 

3. There was a vow to destroy the family unit and to open endless restaurants, making family mealtime (one pillar of family strength) irreverent. At our modern time today, child-less families/individuals plus rising divorce are now the norm. We’re being depopulated, which was also spoken to as one of the cult’s primary agendas, in the Dr, Richard Day Tapes. 

4. That the music would become progressively worse, in order to destabilize the people who listened to it. I think this became obvious when “wet ass pussy” was declared song of the year by NPR (National Public Radio) in 2020. NPR is a government funded organization. Both government and big corp are hunting the public together as one mega predator. Overly sexualizing the female, the destructions of the family unit and the destruction of morality was also high on “the order’s” list of priorities……according to Day.

5. That change would be purposely accelerated to the point where seniors would want to die via state euthanasia, because they could no longer keep up with how fast the world was changing. This is why state sponsored medical suicide is coming above ground all around the world, at the same time that world change is purposely accelerating at breakneck speed. 

6. There would be numerous changes of road names, in order to dilute historical continuity and cultural strength. This is now coming above ground around the world, as Toronto (for example) erased some of its famous Younge Street, renaming it “Little Iran“. Diluting the race and race mixing are big on the cult’s priority list, to dilute cultural strength and historical morals, values and customs. 

7. Dr. Richard Day also said that there are always two reasons for each agenda they put in play. One reason is the “made for public reason“, AKA the lie they tell the public, as to why the ruling group is destroying the people. Then there’s the real reason. Dr. Day went on to say that if people are stupid enough to believe the lies they’re told by their governments and media (like COVID, 9/11, taxation, poison as medicine etc) then they deserve to die. I find this form of gas lighting extremely devilish. 

8. That Christianity was a major impedance to the installation of the NWO order concept (a worldwide communist state) and that destroying Christianity was (and is) one of their primary objectives. Today we see this openly in Canada with over 100 church burnings and/or mass church vandalism.

9. That science was now going to be faked, in order that the population follow their false science religion into the sacrificial volcano. COVID was a prime example of this; all the science was faked, as is clearly stated here. There wasn’t even a COVID virus. It was all faked science. These cons were set up hundreds of years old, as is stated here in this other document, which is very similar to what Dr. Richard Day recounted.

10. That homosexuality would be socially engineered, and encouraged, in order to collapse morality and to also to bring about the depopulation numbers desired by the ruling group. Homosexuality is up 300% in the last decade, so this isn’t genetic. Homosexuality is no longer described as depopulation-based sodomy or a depopulation-based pleasure pursuit. It’s now described as love, equality and inclusion. It’s all about how you market the agenda and what buzz words are used. This is all courtesy of the ruling group of course, who can arrange any goal they wish…..as Dr, Day clearly stated. Yes, we’re being tricked to destroy ourselves, our communities and our species while believing that we’re in full control of our decisions and that our behaviors in life are organic to us.  Naturally gay is very different than socially engineering a mass adoption of gay.  

If you want to learn about the Dr. Richard Day Tapes and listen to them yourself, just click here.

As someone studying this material constantly, I know what’s coming, so I know how to pivot appropriately. I teach everything a person needs to know, in order to sidestep these socially engineered and secret society-based assaults on us, our children and our communities. Come work with me LIVE, started Jan 11th, 2025. You’ll be glad you did. Click here to learn more or click the image below. I will see you on opening day. Make sure your 2026 is safe, secure and successful. My priority is to you and your family.

SOURCE

Money, News

Is INCOME TAX Illegal? The Answer May Surprise You [PART 1]

4 Comments

More truths that have been kept from you. Question everything. Do read the subsequent parts to this article. The final one, The SECRET WEAPON You’ve Never Heard of: Civil Forfeiture – Legally Stealing Property [Income Tax Part 3] is under paid sub however it is a very small sub and you can cancel at any time. I totally recommend subbing… EWNZ

From Agent131711 @ substack

“The 16th Amendment did not provide any new power of taxation of wages derived from labor. This means there was no power before the 16th Amendment, the Amendment did not provide power, and there has been no power added since; therefore, there is no power to tax wages coming from labor.“

Rewind to pre-American Revolution. Back then, America was under the rule of Britain. At this time, there were no income taxes, no corporate taxes, and no payroll taxes. Taxes were levied on ships on a per-tonnage basis (importing into America). This included taxes on slaves, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages. In all, the average tariff worked out to about 10 percent of the value of imports, with lower rates being imposed on goods from Britain than from elsewhere.

When Britain wanted to tax sugar and tea, the Illuminati revolutionaries in America knew this was their opportunity to act. This led to the Boston Tea Party (hoax). While that hoax was taking place, revolutionaries were imported into America to help start what we now refer to as the American Revolution. The whole thing was a giant scheme. People were told they must fight these evil taxes so they can have “freedom” and “liberty”, but, in all irony, as soon as the Revolution ended, new taxes were imposed, this time by our new government.

Read full article at the link

Photo Credit: pixabay.com

land grab, News

The Guardian Promotes Stealing British Farmers’ Land. Says It’s Not ‘Confiscation’ But ‘Asking For A Share’

2 Comments

From The WinePress @ substack

“Farmers have hoarded land for too long. Inheritance tax will bring new life to rural Britain,” says the paper.

The following report was first published on winepressnews.com on November 18th, 2024. The following report is by Will Hutton from The Guardian:

One of the baleful dimensions of our times is the way that the conversation about what constitutes the good society is framed by the rich and their interests. A conception of the common good withers; instead it is replaced by the existential importance of private wealth, private interests and private ownership to societal health. Nowhere is this more exposed than in the debate over taxation, and in particular the taxation of inherited wealth – as the debate over the past fortnight has dramatised.

Half a million people die every year. Under the reforms to inheritance tax relief on agricultural land proposed in the budget, about 500 individuals who inherit land worth more than £2m (£3m if they were married to the deceased) will join the rest of society and have inheritance tax levied on their bequest – albeit at half the rate, with an enlarged exemption and 10 years to pay it, concessions not made to the rest of us. How fortunate and privileged are they?

Yet ever since, the National Farmers Union, Historic Houses, the Tory party, the rightwing media and, inevitably, Elon Musk have behaved as if the move represents a new communist dictatorship. Edward Stanley, the 19th Earl of Derby, denizen of Merseyside’s Knowsley Hall where his family has lived since 1385, represented their united view. “Taking 20% of a business away every generation is just a shockingly awful concept for a government that wants growth,” he told the Financial Times. Positioning himself as a wealth-creating small business, he insisted it “would kill off farming and heritage businesses” like his. According to the lobby, a new age of Jacobin terror has been unleashed – production will collapse, rural Britain will be devastated, and all for a trivial amount of money. Rarely have 500 very privileged people got so hysterical – and commanded so much attention.

There is no acknowledgment of the potential wider benefits that go beyond the non-trivial contribution the tax will make to relieving the crisis in public services. The hoarding of land that has gone on since the bung was introduced by Margaret Thatcher in 1984, which has so steadily driven up land prices and farmers’ rents, will at last be checked as some of the larger estates are obliged to sell parcels of land to pay inheritance tax, as they did before 1984 without the world falling in, rather than be enabled to own it in perpetuity. Young farmers, now increasingly crowded out of the market, will get a chance to buy land: there is the prospect of a levelling off, even a fall, in farm rents. New life and ideas will be brought to the rural economy as innovative, energetic farmers enter the market – and production even increases.

As importantly, a key principle that has underpinned all human societies – that we have a right to share in the bounty of inherited assets – will be reaffirmed. Whether ancient Rome or feudal Europe, societies have taken the view that just because an individual got lucky and came out of the right womb, they are not entitled to inherit everything without paying some levy or tribute on their inherited wealth. After all, wealth is enjoyed in a societal context and society made a contribution to the existence of the wealth. Of course society should share in the transfer, if only in a minor way, and the principle should extend to everyone, with as few exceptions as possible. Far from a death tax, it is a life tax on undeserved good luck.

Why so much fuss? Part of the problem is that rural Britain has never escaped the cultural trappings of feudalism. It is now largely forgotten, but in 1883 the Conservative party, to fight the rise of progressive liberalism and its emergent outrider socialism, set up the mass membership Primrose League, whose adherents formally accepted the vital role that the “landed estates of the realm” played in an idea of imperial, free-enterprise Britain. It was a direct response to William Gladstone’s creation of “succession duty” in 1881 codifying the longstanding practice of levying a duty on the transfer of landed assets – and the principle had to be fought to the last. Within a decade its members, incredibly, outnumbered trade unionists.

The Earl of Derby speaks to that Primrose League tradition, arguing that his family is less a 650-year beneficiary of the baronial carve-up of England after the Norman conquest and more an employment-generating small business. Selling a little of the estate to pay inheritance tax is off limits; instead, the assumption is that the tax will have to be paid from the business’s cashflow, to preserve the estate in perpetuity – hence the over-egged predictions of devastation. In the wider economy, the creation of perpetual monopolies would be widely criticised as not only unfairly entrenching wealth and power but stifling the process of creative churn that is at the heart of economic vitality. Britain’s landed estates are excused from the same criticism.

It is a political and cultural achievement that must be challenged today with the same energy it was challenged by Liberal leaders in the run-up to the First World War. The Lib Dem leader, Ed Davey, calling for the government to suspend the measure, forgets Gladstone’s succession duty, William Harcourt’s introduction of estates duty in 1894 and David Lloyd George’s imaginative plans to break up the monopoly of land ownership. Yet, while the non-royal dukes might no longer have automatic membership of the House of Lords, they still own as much of Britain as they did then. Davey should not cosy up to Musk and co, inflaming the hysteria, but rather back Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves who, to their credit, are holding the line.

But Labour needs to win the argument, and to be convincing that argument must be made from first principles. Inheritance tax springs from the universally held belief that society has the right to share when wealth is transferred on death as a matter of justice. This is not confiscation, especially if the lion’s share of the bequest is left intact. It is asking for a share. The principle should apply to all estates and to everyone. It is fair. It limits the entrenchment of wealth and privilege. It breaks up monopoly, especially of land. It enlarges the tax base. It gives the next generation a chance. Any other argument is the special pleading of plutocrats – and should be seen as such.

The WinePress News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Subscribe

AUTHOR COMMENTARY

Job 24:2 Some remove the landmarks; they violently take away flocks, and feed thereof. [3] They drive away the ass of the fatherless, they take the widow’s ox for a pledge. [4] They turn the needy out of the way: the poor of the earth hide themselves together.

“Asking to share?” It kind of sounds like, ‘Oh, I’m not robbing people, I’m just asking for people’s money.’ Yes, this absolutely IS confiscation: this has communism written all over it.

The Guardian is nothing but a nutty progressive outlet that peddles all sorts of ridiculous, globalist garbage. What this Hutton guy is promoting is plainly communism. How dare families pass down their generational land and wealth? That must sequestered by the state so only the preferred class can have it and subsidize it, so these types of people think.

Proverbs 13:22 A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children’s children: and the wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just.

Proverbs 19:14 House and riches are the inheritance of fathers: and a prudent wife is from the LORD.

This is a poorly masqueraded propaganda piece to justify the government stealing more of private citizens’ land so the government can consolidate more of it. This is what has been happening in countries such as The Netherlands and Ireland already.

Thanks for reading The WinePress News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

SOURCE

Photo Credit: The Winepress