EWNZ comment: Don’t for one minute imagine that NZ is absent from the target list of the weather warfare mongers. Read more on that here.My inquiries of Government (Amy Adams) in 2014 revealed a firm no ..
” The Government does not allow aerosol geoengineering and although it is the subject of some discussion in the scientific community, it is not an accepted method to address climate change...I would like to assure you that there is no deliberate spraying of the nature you suggest and that the health and well-being of New Zealand citizens and our environment are a high priority for this Government.” Link to original letter here (pdf):letter from NZ Min For Environment
That’s a warm fuzzy statement isn’t it? And doesn’t it make you feel safe?Nick Smith, however, then current Min for the Environment, said in Parliament (amidst gales of laughter) that geoengineering was a hoax. ?? Who is right? (See the series on YT: What in the World are They Spraying? Who in the World etc and Why in the World etc).They are reading the globalist script! Relying on your ignorance &/or failure to look deeper than what they are telling you. Question everything!
(Click on the image or title above for the video at Rumble.com)
They have turned the entire sky into one giant death spraying gas chamber, showering your kids with aluminum, barium, and God only knows what while steering trillion dollar kill storms right into the heart of conservative America. Ariana Masters joins us with 75 years of bulletproof contracts, lab proven toxic rain, and satellite footage that nails the treasonous U.S. regime.
Western civilization has been infected by a parasitic invasion of foreign ideals and values that have been introduced into our culture by strange and morally degenerate people whose goal is world domination. We have been OCCUPIED. Watch the film
EPA Provides ‘Total Transparency On The Issues Of Geoengineering And Contrails’ After Deadly Texas Flooding, As Mainstream Media Admits Cloudseeding Occurred Before Floods
“Americans have legitimate questions about contrails and geoengineering, and they deserve straight answers,” says the EPA chief. But it’s more gaslighting as usual.
As of today, July 10th, 121 people have been confirmed dead and over 170 are still reportedly missing, after massive flooding swept through Texas last week. With flooding as horrific as it was, many have asked how such a travesty could happen, and there is some fairly solid evidence that directly points towards cloudseeding/geoengineering as the culprit. Even mainstream media is now being forced to admit it, even if they have to call those asking questions “conspiracy theorists.”
As more people become increasingly aware of the practice of weather modification and cloudseeding, as governments and companies become more overt in their ambitions to modulate the weather to supposedly fight climate change or enhance rainfall in dry areas, more people naturally are looking into this and questioning the practice.
12 U.S. states have introduced legislation to ban the practice, while Tennessee officially banned it last year.
Even though cloudseeding has been promoted on daytime television, mainstream media publications continue to label anyone questioning the practice or its existence as tin-hat wearing “conspiracy theorists.”
Nevertheless, as people began to question and post evidence that the recent floods were the cause of cloudseeding, mainstream media sprung into action to shame anyone who for thinking this… while still admitting that cloudseeding is going on.
The Washington Post cites Augustus Doricko who funded a cloudseeding startup in 2023 called Rainmaker, which prior to the storms that led to the mass flooding, dispersed metals into the atmosphere to induce more rain and that therefore was the cause of the disaster. The WaPo says, “That’s impossible, atmospheric scientists say. Cloud seeding, in which planes scatter dust particles through clouds to trigger rain and snow, remains a fledgling technology, the effects of which are too limited and localized to produce anything remotely like the 15 inches of rain that drowned swaths of South Central Texas over the Fourth of July weekend.”
The WaPo goes on to claim that “hasn’t stopped conspiracy theorists from latching onto cloud seeding as an incendiary explanation for natural disasters. The search for a scapegoat has turned a spotlight on a controversial technology that has drawn interest from drought-stricken Western states and dozens of countries looking to replenish water reservoirs, despite limited evidence that it works and broader social and environmental concerns about altering the weather.”
But the paper does still acknowledge the cloudseeding occurred and silver iodine was sprayed into the sky, per a “contract that Rainmaker had inked this spring with the South Texas Weather Modification Association,” the WaPo wrote. The paper then tries to argue these conspiracy theories are exacerbated because several dozen countries openly participate in weather modification. The outlet wrote:
Efforts to debunk conspiracy theories about geoengineering are further complicated by the fact that some governments really are trying to modify the weather.
At least 39 countries have cloud-seeding programs, according to a December report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. China has invested at least $2 billion since 2014. Saudi Arabia spent more than $250 million on cloud seeding in 2022 alone, according to the report, and the United Arab Emirates and Indiahave invested millions of dollars more in recent years.
While 10 U.S. states have proposed or passed laws banning cloud seeding, nine in the West — amid the worst droughts some areas have seen in 1,200 years — spend millions of dollars a year to squeeze rain or snow out of clouds. Utah leads the pack, with a $5 million annual cloud-seeding budget.
Modern cloud seeding uses techniques the federal government first tried in the 1940s to boost rainfall and disrupt severe storms. Government scientists spent millions of dollars over decades tinkering with clouds.
In the 1960s, the Defense Department secretly tried to induce rainfall to wash out North Vietnamese supply routes — a campaign revealedby the New York Times in 1971 and acknowledgedby the U.S. government three years later.
In another infamous instance, Air Force pilots sprinkled dry ice into a hurricane drifting over the Atlantic Ocean in 1947 to see if they could disrupt its formation; instead, the hurricane abruptly turned toward land, strengthened and caused one death and $2 million in damage, prompting public outcry. The deadly shift was a coincidence, Rauber said, but it taught scientists they should avoid any appearance of causing a disaster.
AUTHOR’S NOTE: Check out my cross-post by Yanasa TV which notes a number of the active cloudseeding projects in Texas, and scientific papers which demonstrate that minerals pumped into the atmosphere can still linger for days and potential greater precipitation than intended.
The Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation lists on its website the different active weather modification projects in the state. They include:
West Texas Weather Modification Association (WTWMA)
South Texas Weather Modification Association (STWMA)
Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District (PGWCD)
Trans Pecos Weather Modification Association (TPWMA)
Rolling Plains Water Enhancement Project
The government website explains who, how much of the state is directly cloud-seeded, and why and how they do it.
With more substantive evidence that cloud seeding could invigorate convective clouds—promoting their growth and capacity to produce rainwater—a coordinated, State-funded program began in earnest in the latter half of the 1990s. Today, with drought a pending, if not ever-present, threat to the economy and well-being of Texans, rain enhancement projects flourish within large areas of Northwest, West, and South Texas. In fact, the seven cloud seeding projects today cover about 31 million acres (or about one-sixth of the land area of the state). When a severe drought was a greater threat at the end of the previous century, as many as 51 million acres were included in cloud seeding “target” areas in the state.
Texas’ present-day cloud seeding efforts are much more than well-considered responses to drought, however. They are also concerted efforts, using the latest technological tools and understanding, to replenish fresh-water supplies in aquifers and reservoirs as well as to help meet the growing needs of agriculture, industry, and municipalities for fresh water. Political subdivisions like water conservation districts and county commissions have embraced the technology of rain enhancement as one element of a long-term, water-management strategy designed to ensure a growing population has enough water to meet its future needs.
Each of the cloud seeding projects uses specially-equipped aircraft designed to place seeding materials (in the form of pyrotechnic devices, or flares, containing silver iodide and other compounds) into convective towers (turrets of growing thunderstorms) to induce them to expand and process more atmospheric water. The seeding is achieved by burning flares either mounted on the wings of single and twin-engine aircraft or held in racks, and dropped (ejected), from the underside of the aircraft fuselage. Pilots in the aircraft are directed to convective clouds believed by the meteorologist to be treatable with the seeding agent. Timing and targeting are the two critical factors in successful seeding of young thunderstorms. The concerted efforts of both pilot(s) and meteorologist are designed to give the growing cloud a “nudge” to enable it to be more efficient in the way it uses available cloud droplets to grow raindrops.
Even though the Texas state government openly discloses its weather modification programs, some state officials continue to downplay the practice. Sid Miller, Commissioner of the Department of Texas Agriculture, claims the state is not contracting companies to spray the skies and makes an appeal to faith, claiming he prays for rain to come instead.
“There has been a lot of misinformation flying around lately, so let me clarify: the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) has absolutely no connection to cloud seeding or any form of weather modification.
“Since the passage of Senate Bill 1303 in 2011, TDA has had no legal authority, responsibilities, or involvement in any weather modification programs. That authority was transferred out of our hands more than a decade ago.
“As an eighth-generation farmer and rancher, I know what it’s like to watch the sky during a drought, hoping for rain. When Texas experiences a dry spell, I don’t depend on artificial weather manipulation; I turn to my faith. I kneel and pray, just as many farmers, ranchers, and rural communities do.
“Let’s put an end to the conspiracy theories and stop blaming others. Our priority should be the recovery efforts in the Texas Hill Country, as we stand in solidarity with our fellow Texans.”
But with many Texans and Americans unsatisfied, yesterday the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a statement promising “Americans Total Transparency on the Issues of Geoengineering and Contrails.” The EPA published two new online resources “to communicate everything the agency knows about the latest science, research and other information regarding contrails and geoengineering,” the press release explains. “EPA is committed to total transparency with the American public on these topics.”
The press release adds:
EPA’s new online resource on condensation trails, or “contrails,” explains the science behind the aerial phenomenon and addresses myths and misconceptions that have persisted for decades. The new webpage also addresses head-on various claims that these occurrences are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.
EPA also created a new online resource focused specifically on solar geoengineering activities, which involve cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight back to space, usually through injecting gases, like sulfur dioxide, into the upper atmosphere where they form reflective particles.
The resource delves into the current state of science and research surrounding geoengineering, including the potentially negative impacts it could have on the environment and human health, including depleting the ozone layer, harming crops, altering weather patterns and creating acid rain.
EPA’s new resource also details what EPA has done to identify and track private actors potentially engaged in such activities. Additionally, the online resource discusses weather modification and cloud seeding, and related federal and state government actions.
Along with the release was a video statement from EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, who attempted to quell concerns Americans have over weather modification. Zeldin acknowledges Americans have been “vilified,” he said, for years for simply asking questions, but under the Trump administration seeks to provide total transparency.
“Americans have legitimate questions about contrails and geoengineering, and they deserve straight answers.
“EPA shares the significant reservations many Americans have when it comes to geoengineering activities.
“Everything we know about contrails to solar/geoengineering will be in there. That means anyone who reads through this information will know as much about these topics as I do as EPA Administrator.
“To anyone who has ever looked up to the streaks in the sky and asked, ‘What the heck is going on?’ Or seen headlines about private actors, and even governments looking to “blot out the sun” in the name of stopping global warming, we’ve endeavored to answer all of your questions […]. In fact, EPA shares many of the same concerns […].”
However, the two links provided by the EPA give the status quo answer and claims there is no connection to geoengineering. Salon reported.
“The EPA website on contrails states in no uncertain terms that “chemtrails” are a myth. The term is used among conspiracy theorists who believe that the contrails of vapor that can form behind an airplane’s engines are actually chemicals being distributed from high altitude. The EPA said those claims are inaccurate, but added that it was “reasonable to ask questions” about unfamiliar phenomena.”
Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz called the idea baseless. “To the best of my knowledge, there is zero evidence of anything related to anything like weather modification,” Cruz told reporters on Monday. “Look, the internet can be a strange place. People can come up with all sorts of crazy theories.”
The closest admission the EPA provides is a short blurb stating: “Persistent contrails can interact with wind and clouds to form cirrus clouds, which are thin, wispy clouds that are common at high altitudes.”
When it comes to the term “chemtrails,” the EPA essentially says that this is a false appropriation and conflation with contrails from jet engines. The EPA tries to pass the buck to crop-dusters flying at low levels to spray pesticides on farm fields.
“Chemtrails” is a shortening of the term “chemical trails”. It is a term some people use to inaccurately claim that contrails resulting from routine air traffic are actually an intentional release of dangerous chemicals or biological agents at high altitudes for a variety of nefarious purposes, including population control, mind control, or attempts to geoengineer Earth or modify the weather.
“Some members of the public have been concerned when they see low flying planes spraying fields known as crop dusting.”
In the end, the EPA pretends it has no knowledge of the U.S. ever intentionally participating in geoengineering.
“The federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification. Geoengineering encompasses a broad range of activities that intentionally attempt to cool the Earth or remove gases from the atmosphere. A subset of these activities is intended to cool the Earth by modifying the amount of sunlight reaching Earth’s surface. This is a subject currently going through intense domestic and international public debate, research, and scrutiny for good reason.”
The WinePress News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, November 15, 2025, #536
Tucker Carlson has now added his voice to the all important battle of exposing and halting the climate engineering assault. The discussion of climate engineering between myself and Tucker went live. Tens of millions of views on numerous posts have accumulated since, and are still growing. A number of international media sources also covered the exchange, just in time for the COP climate conference in Brazil. Will the climate engineering issue finally be forced into the full light of day? Are we finally nearing a critical mass of awareness? Will US mainstream media paid geoengineering deniers finally be forced to face the wrath of justifiably enraged populations? The awakening can’t come soon enough, we are rapidly running out of time. The latest breaking bad news headlines are featured in this installment of Global Alert News.
This is all sounding not unlike the 1080 ruse in NZ… not forgetting the glyphosate one either. All those claims these products are harmless are blatant lies! EWNZ
“There is no upside to this poisoning of Australian farming land, but rather, a wide array of agonising downsides from the brutal programme of poisoning of insects, animals, earth, waterways, and humans. There is not even a clear body of evidence that this supposed “pest control” programme is actually working to reduce the fire ant population. However it is putting many farmers under such added stress that they are breaking down under the strain of the bullying by bureaucrats, and are starting to abandon the farming lifestyle altogether – which then in turn puts food production supply lines under great stress, causing a rise in food costs to Australians already struggling to feed their families.”
This is a video discussion with Liz Gunn, Ginger Bartlett, Tania Fouquet & Bronwyn Holm.
As part of the larger worldwide pushback against what is now seen by millions of aware people as ‘The Climate Change Rort’, we speak to Bronwyn Holm, Ginger, and Tanya about the blatant government overreach and bullying on display with the Fire Ant Eradication Programme in southeast Queensland., Australia.
Ginger and Tanya discuss the government’s forced and unnecessary application of toxic chemicals on farming properties, despite there being zero evidence of fire ant presence on these rural lands.
The toxins are poured on to the land by the overweening and cruelly indifferent bureaucratic enforcers, who have been given vast powers to behave in tyrannical ways by the WEF puppet politicians.
The poisons end up causing widespread environmental damage, the suffering deaths of family pets, as well as serious harm to the health of the farmers who find their lands invaded- and their rights as owners of private land completely over-ruled and ignored.
There is no upside to this poisoning of Australian farming land, but rather, a wide array of agonising downsides from the brutal programme of poisoning of insects, animals, earth, waterways, and humans. There is not even a clear body of evidence that this supposed “pest control” programme is actually working to reduce the fire ant population.
However it is putting many farmers under such added stress that they are breaking down under the strain of the bullying by bureaucrats, and are starting to abandon the farming lifestyle altogether – which then in turn puts food production supply lines under great stress, causing a rise in food costs to Australians already struggling to feed their families.
Included in this widespread discussion about the current intentional globalist cull of farmers, and the manufactured ‘food provision and cost crisis’, is a clarion call for Affidavits- sworn statements of truths of the suffering by Australian farmers – and other tangible evidence about the failures of this pest control scourge, from all farmers who are sick of being pushed around and who want to join up to offer a strong challenge to the Fire Ant Programme.
What is happening in Queensland is part of a much larger picture of unprecedented global government cruelty to our valuable farmers, especially in Western countries.
It’s also part of the Marxist Agenda 2030, from the UN, which has a plan to bring The People to our knees through famine and war and societal division, in order that they can usher in fully digital ID and control, as well as centralised financial control of the human race that they aim to treat like second class citizens of the world, in just the same way that has been done in China.
The People of Australia are called instead to stand together, and to stage collective action, now, against their globalist government, to protect Australia’s land and the food security – for which farmers are needed in vast numbers.
When Australians stand up and push back on this unacceptable bullying of farmers, using fabricated ‘excuses’ like the imagined ‘Fire Ant Problem’, then the world will follow suit.
Please Australia, stand with your farmers and join them, and farmers we ask you all to be united, fearless, and outspoken in your stance against the thoroughly discredited – but highly propagandised – Climate Change Con.
Due to numerous requests to air The Dimming documentary on an independent platform from Youtube in the event that Youtube shuts us down, we are launching a slightly upgraded version of The Dimming on the Rumble platform. Please subscribe and follow this channel as a backup to GeoengineeringWatch.org videos. Our skies are not the same, our weather is not the same, our world is not the same, climate chaos and catastrophe are now the norm. Covert climate engineering operations are wreaking havoc on already badly damaged climate systems around the world. The ground breaking GeoengineeringWatch.org documentary “The Dimming” has reached a milestone of over 25 million views on YouTube as we enter 2025 in spite of ever more severe social media censorship. Hopefully with your help we can make many more aware of the threat posed by the ongoing climate engineering operations. All are needed in the critical battle to wake populations to what is coming, we must make every day count. Share credible data from a credible source, make your voice heard. Dane Wigington
In the attempt to answer as many questions as possible on the dire issue of climate engineering, Geoengineering Watch is producing a weekly “Climate Engineering News Q and A”: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwfFtDFZDpwsQyIUkWcYJzaarFt40K1KM By submitting a question to this email questions@geoengineeringwatch.org you are granting permission for your question and your first name to be read online. If you do not want your first name mentioned, please state that you wish to remain anonymous.
Geoengineering Watch has conducted our first ever high altitude particulate testing. Film footage of the flight and lab testing processes are featured in “The Dimming”, a groundbreaking documentary that is currently in production. This is a new 12+ minute insight segment on the upcoming film. https://youtu.be/4x3z35HA6JQ
“Clown world” doesn’t even begin to describe the absurdity gripping certain corners of the medical establishment. It’s hard to fathom, but one of the newest and most heavily promoted initiatives for healthcare professionals is to get involved in combating climate change. Yes, climate change. At a time when the very foundations of healthcare are crumbling—longer wait times, skyrocketing costs, and millions struggling to see a doctor and get good care—this has somehow become a top priority for some medical leaders.
Go ahead and Google “doctors and climate change.” You’ll find an avalanche of articles from supposedly respected organizations promoting this agenda. Medical journals are also full of articles on “climate and healthcare.” Many are suggesting that doctors should shift their focus from immediate patient care to becoming warriors in the battle against a phenomenon as complex as Earth’s climate.
Let’s be clear: the climate has been evolving for billions of years. To suggest that human beings can wield complete control over such vast systems is, frankly, ludicrous. Of course, we should care for our environment responsibly and strive to make it as clean and non-polluting as possible—but making climate change a healthcare priority? That’s insane.
Misaligned Priorities
The state of healthcare today is nothing short of a disaster in many Western countries. Patients face unprecedented barriers to accessing basic care. Chronic conditions—largely preventable through proper lifestyle interventions—are skyrocketing. Yet, rather than addressing these glaring issues, medical schools and healthcare organizations are diverting attention to training “climate-savvy” doctors.
A piece from CNN highlights this perfectly. Published just a few months ago, it encapsulates this new movement.
The article discusses a new program designed to “mint certified experts in climate medicine.” This program claims to prepare doctors to combat “climate-driven health effects”. Medical schools are also rushing to include climate change in their curriculums— all while basic courses on nutrition and metabolic health remain glaringly absent from medical education.
One anecdote in the piece described a doctor motivated by a serious summer heatwave. Another highlighted an oncologist inspired by a patient who passed away during a winter storm. Tragic weather events, sure—but natural disasters have occurred since the dawn of time. Meanwhile, real medical emergencies—including our failing healthcare system and metabolic health catastrophe (patients battling obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and other lifestyle-related inflammatory diseases)—are being sidelined.
Who Suffers?
Ultimately, it’s the patients who pay the price for these misplaced priorities as doctors’ attention shifts away from where it should be. Instead of focusing on what truly matters—helping individuals improve their health through real evidence-based interventions, giving our patients better access to care, adequately staffing healthcare facilities, encouraging lifestyle changes, and campaigning against the corporate-driven establishment that creates a toxic food environment and pharma-happy culture—leaders are chasing an agenda far removed from patient needs and would truly benefit the general public.
This is why so many people have dismal experiences with healthcare, and suffering continues to escalate. The system is failing because those at the top prioritize flashy, ideological campaigns over fixing what’s broken.
Stay Grounded
I urge you to stay grounded. I know you are sensible—after all, that’s why you’re here. While the above may seem somewhat amusing, it’s actually a travesty for healthcare. Let’s focus on what truly matters: improving the system, empowering our patients, and addressing the root causes of our health crises.
Keep calling out their nonsense. Don’t let them fool you or divert your attention.
What we are now seeing emerge … the smart, and 5, 10 or 15 minute cities. And globally not just the US of course, it being a global plan for those unelected parasites who think they have a right to rule over us… EWNZ
Development decisions affect many aspects of people’s everyday lives – their homes, their health, the schools their children attend, the taxes they pay, their daily commute, the natural environmental around them, and economic opportunity in their community. Smart Growth is an overall approach of development and conservation strategies that help protect our health and natural environment and make our communities more attractive, economically stronger, socially diverse, and resilient to climate change.
Market Common in Arlington, Virginia is a walkable, mixed-use development with access to public transit.
Based on the experience of communities around the nation that have used smart growth approaches to create and maintain great neighborhoods, the Smart Growth Network developed a set of ten (10) basic principles to guide smart growth strategies:
Mix land uses. Take advantage of compact building design. Create a range of housing opportunities and choices. Create walkable neighborhoods.
Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place. Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas. Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities. Provide a variety of transportation choices.
Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective. Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions.
THE LONG-TERM STRATEGY OF THE UNITED STATES 2 THE LONG-TERM STRATEGY OF THE UNITED STATES create high-quality jobs, improve public health in every community, and spur investments
This will come as a shock to many reading this because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN.
However, in actuality, the process of moving the United States towards a complete Agenda 21 style of total urbanization has already commenced and it began nearly 20 years ago.
via RealityCheckRadio: Award-winning investigative journalist James Corbett from The Corbett Report beams in from Japan to talk about COP28 (Conference of the Parties) which was recently held in Dubai. James and Paul discuss the globalist influencers there who are driving policy and events.
Thank you for reading The Corbett Report. This post is public so feel free to share it.
We kid you not. Thanks to Warren for the link … Cars too. (Not jets for jetting to Davos by you know who) … Into the 15, 10 or 5 minute cities you go peasants…
Humans are contributing to global warming by breathing, warns a new study.
British researchers looked at 328 breath samples from 104 participants and found concentrations of methane and nitrous oxide gasses, believed to be more harmful to the environment than carbon dioxide (CO2). While humans expel CO2 as well, it is usually soaked up by plant life and thus has a negligible impact on the environment.
Among the participants, those who emitted the most methane through their breath were more likely to be female and over 30 years old, though the researchers are unsure why.
The study’s authors are also unsure what is causing these gasses to appear in the human body. They dismiss the suggestion that a vegetarian diet rather than a more carnivorous one would be impactful.
“The factors that affect human emissions of CH4 and N2O are not well understood and the impacts of an aging population and shifting diets is still relatively uncertain,” the researchers wrote. “Converting from high meat and protein content diets to higher fibre vegetarian options to mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases from meat production potentially results in higher production of gases in the human gut, and an element of pollution swapping could occur.”
In fact, the researchers looked at the participants’ dietary habits and found that meat consumption had no bearing on methane and nitrous oxide levels expelled through breath.
Nevertheless, the authors recommend that researchers continue to study whether “rigid dietary regimes” might reduce the effect of emissions.
In the study’s conclusion they also caution against dismissing the impact of human breath on the environment as “negligible,” and add that this is exacerbated by human flatulence.
“[W]e would urge caution in the assumption that emissions from humans are negligible. We report only emissions in breath in this study, and flatus emissions are likely to increase these values significantly,” the researchers concluded.
Human breath is only the latest offender determined to cause “climate change.” Other factors include the US military, which Soros-funded groups recently recommended be trimmed or abolished altogether to preserve the environment.
Another factor contributing to “climate change” is private car ownership.
According to a report published by globalist and academic groups earlier this year, all cars — including electric vehicles (EVs) — are harmful to the environment. Because EVs are built with lithium batteries, the current push to convert cars into EVs by globalists like Joe Biden — who has mandated that EVs constitute 50% of the US national fleet by 2030 — will lead to a lithium shortage. When that happens, lithium will need to be mined, which will harm the environment.
By 2050, the report projects, the EV market will require triple the lithium currently used and will thus require significant mining.
Therefore, since the “solution” to “climate change” will, in fact, cause more climate change, the authors suggest reducing car ownership.
The 28th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, better known as COP28, is heating up in Dubai. As expected, the conferencegoers are in unanimous agreement that renewable energy scams are very good and carbon is very, very bad.
Sorry for stating the obvious, but Russia’s delegation at COP28 includes a team of elite ESG grifters eco-heroes from Sberbank. It is maybe not so surprising that the bank that created a “Russian branch of the World Economic Forum’s climate initiative” in 2020 is now spearheading Russian “carbon regulation” at a UN conference dedicated to making life insufferable.
Climate change, according to Sberbank estimates, will annually cause damage to the Russian economy in the amount of 580 billion rubles. This was announced by the bank’s senior vice president for ESG Tatyana Zavyalova.
“Being closely involved in assessing climate risks, we preliminary estimate the damage from climate change in Russia from 2023 to 2027 at an average of 580 billion rubles annually,” she said, speaking at the 28th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP28) .
Zavyalova also noted that for some regions most susceptible to climate change, annual losses can range from 5% to 6% of gross product. In her opinion, the issue of implementing effective climate policy in Russia and the world is “increasingly moving to the economic plane.”
Sber proposed creating a platform within BRICS for discussing the climate agenda among members of the association. This was stated by the bank’s senior vice president for ESG (environmental, social responsibility and corporate governance) Tatyana Zavyalova at the 28th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP28).
“In order to create an appropriate platform for resolving interstate issues of managing the climate agenda, for the development of transboundary projects, synchronizing approaches to carbon regulation and developing joint standards for the energy transition, Sber proposes to create a BRICS climate council,” she said.
Sberbank has been very busy over the past few years creating clot-shots, cattle-tags, biometric payment systems, and so much more, as part of the bank’s core mission of creating a safe and convenient “client path” for each and every Russian citizen. Sber’s friendly CEO even takes time out of his busy schedule to chat with Vladimir Putin about how he wants to use AI to transform every aspect of Russian society.
So it’s only natural that Sber should also be intimately involved in the creation of a “BRICS climate council” charged with synchronizing “carbon regulation”. This is what a bank run by a friendly man would do.
WATCH YOUR BACK, CARBON! GREF AND BRICS ARE COMING FOR YOU!
The indoctrination of the climate change hoax has been so well prepared, and for so long, and with billions and billions of dollars by professional social and mind engineers (i.e., the UK-based Tavistock Institute) and with the collaboration of the entire UN system – it is virtually impossible to convince the smartest, most educated, and most honest people that they have been lured into a trap.
Even when they see that something is not quite right, their quiet inner mind tells them, “Cannot be; impossible that the government, and my scientist friends lie to me…”
It is self-denial – as self-protection.
Admitting that one has been betrayed for most of one’s life would be too shameful no matter how many others were lured and lied into the same trap. Admission, might be interpreted as meaning, that we are not smart. Nobody wants to be “un-smart.”
It is true, though, that over the past three decades or so, the lie-talk, coming from governments, international bodies like the UN, and repeated at nauseatum by the mainstream media, is so pervasive that doubting it is not only “uncool”, but more so, socially and politically incorrect.
Hardly anybody wants to be socially and politically incorrect.
You are soon considered an outcast. Nobody wants to be an outcast.
The truth is, today about 90% of the official narrative, emanating from supposedly expert institutions, and from the authorities paid by your taxes – are lies, false, fake, manipulated – so you will not know the truth, so you will obey the orders that follow the lies.
Let us illuminate some facts about climate change.
1. The climate changes all the time – usually in “waves” of 15 – 20,000- or so years, with smaller cycles in between. Therefore, climate changes are slow, so slow that life on earth can naturally adapt, without hardly noticing anything in our short human lifespan of some 80 years.
2. More than 90%, some scientists say, between 95% and 97% of climate change is caused by solar activities, which also come in cycles. Real scientists say that human activities, industries, cars, agriculture – even military (which the mainstream never mentions – in the COP meetings [see below on COP] it is strictly forbidden to talk about the military CO2 output) – produce less than 0.3% of CO2, unnoticeable because any excesses are absorbed by the seas.
The seas also release CO2 when forests, mainly rainforests, and trees in general need more for their survival – CO2 being vital food for trees, which, in turn produce the oxygen from which most life on earth lives. A perfectly balanced symbiosis. Mother Earth knows what she is doing.
3. The key is – there is of course an agenda behind the so-called manmade CO2 caused “climate change” when Al Gore made the round in the early 2000s with his propaganda climate speeches, including at the World Bank and other international agencies, it was called “global warming”, then the narrative changed because you can do more with a both-sided, cooling and warming, “climate change”.
This idea dates back to the Club of Rome, their infamous 1972 report “Limits to Growth”. The Club’s first objective, as stated in the Report, is population reduction by more than 90% so that the earth’s non-renewable resources will last longer for a small elite. As simple as that.
“Limits to Growth” is still today the blueprint for the Great Reset / UN Agenda 2030. So, the population reduction narrative is still alive and well – as you know. The eugenists, Gates and Rockefellers et al, are quite omni-present.
See also this – quite recent, from an author of “limits to Growth”:
NITROGEN 2000 is a 45-minute documentary on the Dutch Farmer struggle of 2019-23. 70% of Holland is owned by small cattle farmers and since 2019, the Dutch government has been advocating a 50% forced buyout of their land. This amounts to a nationalisation of a third of the territory of Holland.
Is this really about lowering nitrogen levels to help orchids over nettles? What other darker designs lie behind the nitrogen policy of Holland? Surely if it were truly about nitrogen other solutions could be found than disenfranchising the most efficient farmers on the planet. In NITROGEN 2000 Big Picture gets to the bottom of the story.
Big Picture’s James Patrick initially went to the Netherlands to shoot two interviews for another film which was under production. While he was there, he got in touch with some leaders of the Dutch farmers’ groups fighting the government’s policy to forcibly buy out their farms.
When he arrived in the Netherlands, Patrick realised that a third of the farms had signs displaying “HELP!.” Upside-down flags were hanging everywhere. It quickly became evident to him that this was a much bigger event than most understood. “I jumped onto the story and aggressively shot an entire film in 6 days,” he said.
What is happening in Holland is a warning to the world of what is to come if we don’t put a stop to this expropriation of the Dutch farmer’s land.
This is a big story. The government of Holland – with European Union blessings – is seeking to forcefully purchase one-third of their territory, disenfranchising half of their cattle farmers.
As everyone knows, corporate media constantly demonises cows: they make methane; their burps are evil; they cause nitrogen to run off into waterways. But the insane argument the Dutch government is using is that the nitrogen in cow dung is settling on protected areas, called Natura 2000 and causing plants less than 1 ft tall to suffer because other plants that grow higher block the sun for the smaller ones. That the government would declare war on half of their farmers in the name of short plants. “It’s a joke, and they have no credibility,” Patrick said.
This appears to be a story of seizing land under questionable “environmental” pretences and removing the bulk of the Dutch farmers from the market, effectively taking them offline. In terms of production per hectare, Dutch farmers are the most efficient farmers in the world. If a large restructuring of the food system is being engineered, sandbagging Dutch farmers is a crucial step towards achieving that goal.
The documentary ‘NITROGEN 2000’ gets to the bottom of the story. Partick interviewed the top players in the story to help people understand this complex phenomenon in a world in transition. To fight for our rights and well-being, we must understand what is happening to us. “This is the mission of my work: to help people see the Big Picture,” he said.
The documentary is free to view, in several languages, but if you would like to make a donation to support the Big Picture’s work, you can do so HERE.
EWR (EnviroWatchRangitikei) An article here from Higgins Storm Chasers on FB (as posted by them in comments recently). It is summarizing the events in Australia of late. (If you are not up to speed on this, follow all the links in the recent article on the Australian fires at this link). When compiling all the various evidence that mainstream will never point out to you some things begin to make sense. For starters the fact of very recent cuts to fire services in NSW. Why all of a sudden, in a country that is known for fires? And only a month ago. Forty million is a lot of money. Also …
Thousands of residents were told NOT to expect help from the RFS and were left to fend for themselves.
Now that is sounding like recent events in NZ with the White Island eruption. It transpired that the authorities had (supposedly) done their sums & figured it would not be cost effective (?) to rescue the people. So forthwith they decided NOT to go and of course did not embarrass themselves by telling the people that. They were later crowing however about their later attempts, whilst failing to mention that first responders were in fact NZ CITIZENS (who supposedly hadn’t done their sums) … Kiwis are like that). On that note, just days before this disaster, NZ Civil Defense had morphed into NEMA. Interesting changes are taking place as events unfold.
For further info on UN Agenda 2030 (formerly known by its earlier version Agenda 21 … visit our Agenda 21/30 page & sub pages particularly also, NZ. (Two years ago a former NZ detective told me that our fire services are now under the UN. Remember during the Port Hills fires in NZ the firemen were frustrated because they’d been held back from responding?) In Australia Anne Bressington exposed / blew the whistle on Agenda 21 whilst a politician there. Read also Rosa Koire’s ‘Behind the Green Mask‘. You could also search Agenda 21 and 21/30 in ‘categories’ to the left of the page. All articles on topic will come up there. This agenda is now in plain sight if you care to look & join some dots. We have been exposing it for years & been called conspiratorial however now that the SHTF so to speak, it is harder to consign this to the conspiracy basket. Quietly under the radar, folk have been losing their farms & homes whilst meantime it is harder to own a house & is becoming hard even to be able to afford to rent. This is the plan. We are to be driven into the smart cities this article below talks about. Little by little your options are being withdrawn. All ‘for your own good’ of course … it’s called ‘sustainable development’. The biggest lie ever told. Look around you and see if in the three decades since this plan was drawn up, there is anything that has been managed sustainably. We cannot swim in our waters any more. Too polluted. NZ has 43K+ homeless & suicide & poverty are unprecedented. A broken down & homeless population is easy to control. They are swiftly putting paid to off grid in Australia with fire, and in NZ 1080 is taking care of that. Welcome to your pack & stack, closely surveilled smart city accommodation. EWR
“People think this past week has just been about bush fires, but its been about so much more.
These bush fires are destined to be used as a catalyst to change the face of Australia!
First of all, its very suspicious that so many fires broke out at the same time, stretching fire services to the limit to try to contain them. There were over 80 fires burning at one stage.
Secondly, scarcely a month ago, Premier of NSW, Gladys Berejiklian, made a $40 MILLION CUT to funding for fire services in NSW which ensured that when the fires broke out there wouldn’t be the resources to deal with them adequately.
Thousands of residents were told NOT to expect help from the RFS and were left to fend for themselves.
And finally, because of the sheer ferocity and devastation, we are now being told that we must rethink how we live, with a push to get people off the land.
Enter the CLARA company (Consolidated Land and Rail Australia) which made a proposal to Govt in 2017 for a high speed rail train line from Melbourne to Brisbane, including at least 3 SMART cities to be built along with it. Interestingly, many of the fires along the east coast correspond to the proposed route for the high speed rail line AND part of the CLARA proposal includes setting aside land for this development which cannot be used for anything else. This means that out of the misery and loss of these fires, the Govt and the Clara company already know (in my opinion) that the land is actually being cleared (by fire) to make way for the rail line.
For those who don’t know, one of the basic aims of AGENDA 21 AND AGENDA 2030 is to remove people from the land and herd them into ‘smart’ cities, connected by high speed rail.
No doubt those who have lost property to fires along the proposed rail route, will NOT be allowed to rebuild on their own land, but will be encouraged instead, to rebuild within the areas designated for the new smart cities.
The fire phenomenon we are now witnessing will also be used to promote the CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX and could result in a raft of new laws to restrict people’s use of the land, as well as the introduction of CARBON TAXES on almost every human activity in the pretence of saving the environment. All it will really do is make the rich, richer and send ordinary Australians deeper into poverty.
You must be logged in to post a comment.