Check EHT’s website (link below) for more info on EMFs and their affect on your own health also EWR
The Environmental Health Trust @ Facebook
“RF-EMFs stands for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, more commonly known as wireless radiation (the radiation emitted by cell phones, cell towers, WiFi routers, etc.). Not only does wireless radiation impact human health, but it also impacts #plants like #tomato #corn and #onion and plants.”
Review: Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this article was to explore the hypothesis that non-thermal, weak, radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have an effect on living plants. Subject and methods: In this study, we performed an analysis of the data extracted from the 45 peer-reviewed scientific publications (1996–2016) describing 169 experimental observations to detect the physiological and morphological changes in plants due to the non-thermal RF-EMF effects from mobile phone radiation. Twenty-nine different species of plants were considered in this work. Results: Our analysis demonstrates that the data from a substantial amount of the studies on RF-EMFs from mobile phones show physiological and/or morphological effects (89.9%, p < 0.001). Additionally, our analysis of the results from these reported studies demonstrates that the maize, roselle, pea, fenugreek, duckweeds, tomato, onions and mungbean plants seem to be very sensitive to RF-EMFs. Our findings also suggest that plants seem to be more responsive to certain frequencies, especially the frequencies between (i) 800 and 1500 MHz (p < 0.0001), (ii) 1500 and 2400 MHz (p < 0.0001) and (iii) 3500 and 8000 MHz (p = 0.0161). Conclusion: The available literature on the effect of RF-EMFs on plants to date observed the significant trend of radiofrequency radiation influence on plants. Hence, this study provides new evidence supporting our hypothesis. Nonetheless, this endorses the need for more experiments to observe the effects of RF-EMFs, especially for the longer exposure durations, using the whole organisms.
READ MORE AT THE LINK
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15368378.2016.1220389?journalCode=iebm20
EHR’s website: https://www.facebook.com/EHTrust
Header Photo: pixabay.com
Go here for other posts on topic
Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Hi Pam,As the report says it’s a hypothesis, a theory and then it says ” Nonetheless, this endorses the need for more experiments to observe the effects of RF-EMFs, especially for the longer exposure durations, using the whole organisms.” In other words the theory is still being tested. When more comes out I will try to find time to read it. Ray
LikeLiked by 1 person
The industry is very loathe to acknowledge any harm from EMFs Ray. The onus of proof of being harmLESS ought to be on them. Not on us to prove it IS harmful. Either way the corporation always wins. Have you ever watched the doco Take Back Your Power?
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing!
LikeLike