This group of professionals is HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team):
“HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts. We came together over shared concerns about policy and guidance recommendations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We continue to be concerned about the lack of open scientific debate in mainstream media and the worrying trend of censorship and harassment of those who question the narrative. Science without question is dogma.”
We must not repeat mistakes from history
It is shocking that as of Friday 6 June the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer vaccine in children aged 12 to 15 years old.
The MHRA apparently carried out a “rigorous review” and found that “safety, quality and effectiveness have been met”. Quite how they can be satisfied that the required safety standards have been met is unclear when this product is still at the research stage with only limited short-term safety data available and nothing yet known about any medium or long-term side effects.
The child clinical trials will continue to be monitored for long term protection and safety two years after vaccination. If serious, long-term health impacts emerge, it will be too late for those who are vaccinated now, who will have to live with the consequences. Already there seems to be a signal in the data from Israel revealing myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) described by the Israeli health authority as 1 in 44,000 16-30 year-olds, but with higher incidence in the youngest groups. This is not responsible medicine and is a reckless approach to children‘s health.
READ MORE
Photo: pixabay.com
Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pam – this has just come through regarding criminal proceedings being instituted in Australia “Brett Sutton Chief Health Victoria Australia Now Under Formal Investigation for Indictable Crimes” documents can be viewed here: http://www.vaxrisk.org/VERITAS1.pdf
Who has the wherewithal to get a similar action underway in New Zealand? Clearly beyond urgent.
LikeLike
Thanks for the link Kevin. I’ve briefly scanned it & will get some feedback. Certainly one lawyer (Sue Grey) has gone to Court over the provisional only approval in NZ, if you read here frequently you’ll know the Govt then just tweaked the law & proceeded with the vx. I’m of the opinion the courts are so corrupt I wonder at the likely success of appealing to ‘their’ system. Not to discourage anybody from doing so however. What do you think?
LikeLike
Can I share this?
LikeLike