Suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders” should be used to force people to get a jab
Source: Steve Watson | Infowars.com
A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine has called for mandating a coronavirus vaccine, and outlined strategies for how Americans could be FORCED to take it.
The paperwarns that an immediate mandate for the vaccine would spark too much resistance and backlash, so the writers suggest that at first it should be voluntary.
However, it suggests that if not enough people are willing to get the vaccine within the first few weeks of it’s availability, it should be transformed into an obligation, with penalties put into place for refusal.
The paper outlines “six trigger criteria” that need to be met before the vaccine is made mandatory, and that it should be rolled out to specific demographics of the population first.
“Only recommended groups should…
View original post 305 more words
Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
First–if they do not have the genome for what they are selling, they cannot call this a vaccine. Since it is not a vaccine, the rules are different. If this shot injures anyone, they can be sued.
Now I see why those pushing this shot were requesting a specific indemnity relative to COVID.
Second–It’s been a long time since the NEJM could be trusted with any of their science. Its editors are at the heart of corporatized medicine. Corporate Medicine is far more interested in profit than health. There is no profit in healthy people.
Any person or organization seeking to force anyone into this medical experimentation is guilty of crimes against humanity–violating the Nuremberg Code. This shot will alter the human genome in ways never attempted before. Coercion of any sort is disallowed under the Nuremberg Code. It appears NEJM is violating that Code.
Nuremberg Code
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlV_aR4995I
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Joyce for the info.
LikeLike