When is a ‘surplus’ not a surplus? When it appears in a set of KCDC accounts

Waikanae watchers's avatarWaikanae Watch

The KCDC is good at ‘smoke and mirrors’ accounting and we have another example in the latest annual report for 2018-2019 which it has now posted online here.

The claim of a $3.1 million surplus occurs on page 89 of the pdf.  No doubt the council will be claiming this in a media release.

Iride asked two financial analysts to comment: their replies:


There is not a surplus — the Council actually traded at a loss of $4,923,000 — this is because they made a loss of $8,021,000 on derivatives.

And this loss is actually part of their operations.

You will see from the accounts that the Council has actually lost $10,310,000 in the last three years in derivatives. I have never understood derivatives, but know that Aldous and I spent some time with Glenn Maxwell some years ago and I was just as confused at the end as…

View original post 181 more words


Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Your comments are welcome