NZ Health Minister David Clark dismisses 5G radiation exposure warnings

Kevin's avatarSpirit Strength

no5gnzThe information that follows is reprinted from Zane Small’s article (26.02.19) on the Newshub web site.

This is where we are in 2019 regarding the 5G implementation track in New Zealand. This is the mindset we are facing. No independent testing. No precaution. No listening to independent experts. Please ask yourself why this might be so

The Health Minister has dismissed concerns raised by 230 scientists around the world that 5G radiation could pose a significant health risk.

The group of scientists, including one from New Zealand and eight from Australia, have expressed “serious concerns” about increasing exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) when 5G technology is rolled out.

5G, or fifth generation, is the next step in mobile internet connectivity, set to launch commercially in some countries in 2020. While it will offer faster speeds and more reliable connections, it will also require more antennas, thus increasing exposure to…

View original post 665 more words


Discover more from Environmental Health Watch NZ

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “NZ Health Minister David Clark dismisses 5G radiation exposure warnings”

  1. Send the clown this:

    Swiss firms will not be compensated if 5G found to be harmful

    The Swiss government will apply the precautionary principle to fifth generation mobile communications (5G) and can tighten existing laws in the face of new scientific evidence on risks.

    Mobile operators that have invested in 5G technology will not be financially compensated by the state if stricter laws are introduced, the Federal Council responded on Thursday to a parliamentarian’s question. The financial cost of complying with scientifically-backed new legislation will have to be borne by the telecom companies. There was acknowledgement of the World Health Organization’s decision to classify high frequency radiation as potentially carcinogenic to humans but the government pointed out the absence of relevant long-term studies.

    Hence, the Federal Council has taken these grey areas into account based on the precautionary principle. It has set stricter installation limit values for sensitive areas likes homes, schools, hospitals, offices, playgrounds, etc. to ensure low-level exposure over the long term.

    When it comes to compensating victims of harmful exposure, several existing legal provisions would make it possible to demand compensation, provided a causal link can be proven. As of now, the law does not provide for the creation of a mutual compensation fund financed by mobile telephone operators.

    https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/business/scientific-evidence-_swiss-firms-will-not-be-compensated-if-5g-found-to-be-harmful/44984736

    Liked by 1 person

Your comments are welcome